T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1120.1 | In Valbonne, last time I was there anyway | MANANA::ARNOLD | Gotta be a pony here somewhere! | Mon Jun 11 1990 12:44 | 1 |
|
|
1120.2 | and Munich | OVAL::KERRELLD | sponplatter lager | Mon Jun 11 1990 13:40 | 0 |
1120.3 | Tokyo too, I've heard... | HYEND::DMONTGOMERY | | Mon Jun 11 1990 13:51 | 1 |
|
|
1120.4 | Sounds great, where do I sign? | AUSTIN::UNLAND | Sic Biscuitus Disintegratum | Mon Jun 11 1990 14:43 | 7 |
| Gee, any of you guys have job openings over there??? All we get
is the "Pepsi Challenge":
Trying to find change for the Pepsi machine, when it works ...
Geoff
|
1120.5 | | BIGUN::SIMPSON | more CPU power than a toaster | Tue Jun 12 1990 00:13 | 4 |
| In Oz we don't have beer in vending machines at work, but I've yet to
see an office without a fridge full! Of course, when the muckity-mucks
from the States come over we have to drink it all very quickly and
pretend we are just like they are.
|
1120.6 | No beer in Vbo anymore | BEAGLE::BLOMBERG | | Tue Jun 12 1990 04:26 | 5 |
|
We had beer in the vending machines in Valbonne up to a few years
ago, but not anymore. Our cafeterias offer beer and wine for lunch.
/Ake
|
1120.7 | Spain/UK | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | It's motorcycling weather again | Tue Jun 12 1990 05:35 | 6 |
|
Add Madrid, plus Shandy in the UK ........
Shandy = mix of lemonade & beer beloved of children, approx 1.2%
alcohol (ie stronger than many LA beers). 25c a can, LA beer $1
or more!
|
1120.8 | None in TKO | TKOV58::SHIMONO | NULL is a trademark of Mattel Corp. | Tue Jun 12 1990 05:37 | 7 |
| Re: < Note 1120.3 by HYEND::DMONTGOMERY >
> -< Tokyo too, I've heard... >-
I don't believe we have any vending machine which offers beer in DEC-Japan.
Dolby SHIMONO
DEC-Japan Tokyo
|
1120.9 | Reply from EHQ | SHIRE::MOHN | blank space intentionally filled | Tue Jun 12 1990 08:58 | 1 |
| Plenty of beer and wine in the cafeteria all day here in Geneva.
|
1120.10 | | MARVIN::COCKBURN | Craig Cockburn | Tue Jun 12 1990 10:28 | 29 |
| > <<< Note 1120.0 by FNYTC6::HOUZE "Je dirais meme plus: Pas d'affolement" >>>
> -< BEER AT WORK >-
>DEC does not allow alcohol at work. Beer contains alcohol right ?
As far as I am aware, that rule only applies in the US. The US is
paranoic about drink, in my opinion. Not only do they have one of
the highest drinking ages around, but it's rigidly enforced too.
I understand that even the odd drink at lunchtime is frowned upon in
the US, whereas going down the pub on a Friday lunchtime is a pretty
widespread custom in England.
Most of the rest of the world has a more relaxed attitide towards
drink, as other replies have shown.
In the UK, the company even subsidies 'booze cruises' across the Channel
to France to buy wine and beer etc via the Sports and Social club, and
there is a bar in Reading on Digital premises, which Digital subsidises!!
(It doesn't serve alchohol during normal office hours though I think)
>Is there any DEC location where soft drinks machines (or non-stop cafeteria)
>offers beer outside lunch hours, along with coke and orange juice ?
I have heard it said that in France, restaurants (including canteens) have
to serve wine. In Germany, certain drinks dispensing machines also have to
serve beer. Not having lived in either of these countries, I am not certain
- perhaps an inhabitant can clarify this?
Craig
|
1120.11 | | THEBUS::THACKERAY | | Tue Jun 12 1990 12:03 | 11 |
| I was recently in Tokyo. About a quarter of the vending machines in the
streets and in shopping centres and in large office buildings had beer
in them. When walking around town, I frequently put a few yen into a
machine on the street, pulled out a Suntori, popped the cork and
slugged it there and then. It was hot outside.
Don't think you can get away with that in the US! Actually, I don't kow
if I was breaking any Japanese laws, but it seemed the natural thing to
do....
Ray.
|
1120.12 | beer = isotonic beverage | WIENER::UHL | DTN:855-1226 @VNO, WIENER::UHL | Tue Jun 12 1990 12:59 | 5 |
| there is beer and wine available at our cafeterias here in Austria...
Thats because beer is (by law) considered food, & wine has to go
with food anyhow ( & the rather low quality of wine served in our
canteens is used as antifreeze ). BTW beer here is also known as
the only natural 'isotonic' beverage.
|
1120.13 | | REGENT::WOLF | | Tue Jun 12 1990 14:07 | 11 |
| I believe the replies have the reasoning slightly backwards. I believe
Europe and GIA allow alcoholic beverages on-site as the rules of
and morales of Europe adn GIA are quite different than that of the U.S.
And so even though DEC might have liked to extend its no alcohol rule
across the pond, to be able to hire and keep employees in the
localities, Dec has had to play by the local rules.
Good, bad or indifferent, that's not for me to decide.
jeff
|
1120.14 | Consumption of beer/wine leads to improved productivity? | HYEND::DMONTGOMERY | | Tue Jun 12 1990 16:57 | 16 |
| Interesting (and decidedly UN-scientific) observation:
The part of Digital that allows beer/wine in the workplace accounts for
over half of Digital's revenue, while using just about 3/4 as many
employees to do it. AND since that part of Digital also grants
considerably more vacation time, it follows that Revenue/Man-Hour is
significantly higher where our employees may imbibe than where they may
not. Rough calculations ($13B split 52% non-US, 48% US; 250 work
days/yr US, 235 work days/yr non-US; 8 hr days) show me that the
Revenue $/Man-hr in the US is about $44.00, while the Revenue $/man-hr
in the alcohol-drinking Digital sites is about $65.00 -- a 33%
increase in "productivity".
But of course, there couldn't possibly be a link, could there?
-Don-
|
1120.15 | hit the beer machine during lunch did you :-) | CVG::THOMPSON | Aut vincere aut mori | Tue Jun 12 1990 17:56 | 4 |
| RE: .14 This is exactly the kind of misuse of statistics that causes
people to discount them.
Alfred
|
1120.16 | And travel time for the larger geography? | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Jun 12 1990 21:56 | 5 |
| Re .14
Did you account for the fact that most of engineering is in the U.S.?
/john
|
1120.17 | Boss. May I have a glass of beer? | TKOV58::SHIMONO | in selected theaters | Wed Jun 13 1990 01:02 | 11 |
| Re: Alcohol in Japan/DEC-Japan
Lots of vending machines are all over Japan. Some of them offers beer
and/or whisky. You can get a Suntory from one of them and drink on the
street without breaking any Japanese law. I doubt if ones at office have
beer in them, though. Most of Japanese firms don't permit beer at work,
I believe. The personnel policies of ours reglates work under the
influence of alcohol. I may not drink beer at office *without permission
of DEC-Japan*.
dolby
|
1120.18 | Discounted statistics! Gotta have some of those.... | VOGON::KAPPLER | John Kappler | Wed Jun 13 1990 07:17 | 11 |
| Re: .15
Alfred,
At what percentage rate did you discount the statistics? Did you use
the same rate for all items, or different rates? Did you get a
different answer?
(-:
JK
|
1120.19 | Vending machine beer | MUDHWK::LAWLER | Twelve Cylinders - NO LUCAS electrics. | Wed Jun 13 1990 08:12 | 12 |
|
FWIW, when I was over in Valbonne last month, we were discussing
this topic. Somebody there told me that there used to be Beer
in the vending machines as well as in the cafeteria, but the night
cleaning crews used to keep emptying the machines since it was
cheaper than buying it at a store... Don't know if this is true
or not, but it sounded plausible at the time...
-al
|
1120.20 | How come someone hasn't sent _this_ suggestion to IDEAS CENTRAL? | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Wed Jun 13 1990 11:13 | 9 |
| Well, if you want beer at work in the U.S., maybe you should form an employee
task-force and petition to management, demanding the same rights that our
German employees have.
While you're at it, get us nine weeks of vacation and more holidays.
And the higher German salaries.
/john
|
1120.21 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Jun 14 1990 10:05 | 19 |
| > <<< Note 1120.19 by MUDHWK::LAWLER "Twelve Cylinders - NO LUCAS electrics." >>>
> FWIW, when I was over in Valbonne last month, we were discussing
> this topic. Somebody there told me that there used to be Beer
> in the vending machines as well as in the cafeteria, but the night
> cleaning crews used to keep emptying the machines since it was
> cheaper than buying it at a store... Don't know if this is true
> or not, but it sounded plausible at the time...
I visited Valbonne a few years ago, and at that time the beer in the vending
machines was 1 franc (something between 15 and 20 US cents) for a ~300ml can.
I don't know what beer went for in stores there, but a dollar a six pack
would seem an attractive price to me.
The only apparent concession to (American) propriety was that the beer column
in the vending machine was unlabeled, so you had to know ahead of time
what your franc coin would deliver to you.
- tom]
|
1120.22 | News from VBO, MUH.. | BONNET::BREICHNER | | Thu Jun 14 1990 11:28 | 21 |
| re: .19--.21
As Valbonner I confirm that beer has been definately banned from
the vending machines. French law only allows alcoholic beverages
together with meals. Hence there's still beer and wine for lunch
in the cafeteria(s). ("cantine")
I don't remember 1FF for a can of beer, but 2FF was still actractive
enough to have some people (rumours include managers) fill up their
attache cases before heading home....
(Now soft drinks are 4FF).
Personally beeing a beer drinker, I really don't care as I prefer
having it served at the right time in the right quantity and in the
right company at the right temperature in our local joint:
The infamous MYKONOS or when somebody brings in some bottles
(ex. from a trip to Belgium...) and wishes to share the treasue
with friends and collegues just after duty.
I understand that Germany (Munich in particular) has different laws
and last year I was happy to find "L�wenbr�u" BOTTLES in the DEC's
vending machines at a reasonable price.
Valuing differences !
Fred
|
1120.23 | S&SC and Alcohol | JOCKEY::GEARYP | Up the Wolves | Thu Jun 14 1990 13:07 | 17 |
| In Grand Britannia we don't have drink in the districts but the
boys at Reading do have a bar!!
On another note, I am a member of our local sports and social club.
We cannot supply, or contribute to, booze at social events. This
is a rigidly enforeced rule in our District but does cause some raised
eyebrows.
We obviously entertain customers with complementary drinks at company
doos, it is an accepted business practice, but we cannot spend what is
in effect partly our own money (from our contributions) towards
"lubricating" a social function, with a few free drinks. We provide
foods at the functions so why not wine and beer.
Do other sports and social clubs members feel that a review is needed
of the S&SC rules on this point?
Does anyone know the real reason behind the ruling?
|
1120.24 | Legal responsibility | ARCHER::LAWRENCE | | Thu Jun 14 1990 13:16 | 14 |
| > Does anyone know the real reason behind the ruling?
Don't know about outside the States, but there was a law passed a number of
years ago which put the supplier of liquor 'at fault' if the person doing
the drinking had an accident. This effects bartenders, hosts/hostesses, or
any other 'entity' that supplies booze.
It was shortly after this law went into effect that Digital stopped freely
serving liquor at company functions. When I got my ten year award (ten
years ago!) there were chapaigne (sp?) FOUNTAINS in the anteroom! When
I got my fifteen year award we were served one small carafe of wine.
Betty
|
1120.25 | | SDEVAX::THACKERAY | | Thu Jun 14 1990 13:31 | 14 |
| I remember a wonderful cartoon that said it all.
There was a farmer in the dock at a law court. The lawyer said to him:
"So YOU'RE the farmer who grew the barley and sold it to the processor,
who sold the malt to the brewer, who sold the beer to the distributer, who
sold it to the bar, who sold it to the consumer........."
Europe and parts of GIA prove that people can quite effectively be
treated as adults with their own judgement on the matter of drinking.
It doesn't need legislation. Of course, the throwbacks from 20's
Prohibition will never agree.
Ray
|
1120.26 | | OTOO01::POND | | Thu Jun 14 1990 13:40 | 14 |
| Reading the various replies from European folks makes me think
how very different our (Europe and North American) attitudes
must be towards alcohol.
We have it drilled into our heads 24 hours a day (here in
Canada anyway) to drink responsibly, don't drink and drive,
think about your kids you're leaving behind, don't need to
drink to fit in, alcohol free bodies, etc etc etc.
Drinking at lunchtime and then returning to work is
DEFINITELY frowned upon in my experience.
Jim
|
1120.27 | from another UK noter | OVAL::KERRELLD | sponplatter lager | Thu Jun 14 1990 13:52 | 9 |
| re.23:
> On another note, I am a member of our local sports and social club.
> We cannot supply, or contribute to, booze at social events.
No such rule exists in the Digital Sports & Social Clubs I have belonged
too. Where in the UK are you?
Dave.
|
1120.28 | A message from the pedantic treasurer | JOCKEY::BOURNEJ | EASYEDIT rules OK! | Fri Jun 15 1990 05:07 | 29 |
| > < Note 1120.23 by JOCKEY::GEARYP "Up the Wolves" >
> -< S&SC and Alcohol >-
>
> On another note, I am a member of our local sports and social club.
> We cannot supply, or contribute to, booze at social events. This
> is a rigidly enforeced rule in our District but does cause some raised
> eyebrows.
Re: Patrick's note above and .27 from Dave Kerrell...
As the treasurer at Newmarket (UK) where Patrick is a committee
member, and the person who is being pedantic about the rules (and
presumably causing the "raised eyebrows") I want to set the record
straight.
UK Personnel Policies & Procedures
Section 6.23 Company Support To Sports & Social Clubs
Sub-section GUIDELINES
NOT TO BE USED FOR...
PROVISION OF CHEAP OR FREE ALCOHOL AT ANY EVENT (amongst others)
Any review of the S&SC rules will have to be taken up with whoever
is responsible for maintaining the UK Personnel Policies & Procedures
manual.
Jim Bourne
S&SC Treasurer (Newmarket, UK)
|
1120.29 | Ahh, But payback is-Ahh, but payback is-- | BTOVT::CACCIA_S | the REAL steve | Mon Jun 18 1990 15:03 | 12 |
|
The world outside the U.S. may certainly be more tolerant of alcoholic
beverages in the workplace and consumption of same in public, however,
there is a major difference in the response to an intoxicated person.
In the U.S. it is not unusual for a person to be convicted of driving
under the influence several times and face nothing more than a fine. It
is also not unheard of for a person to have been convicted of vehicular
homicide and not have their drivers license revoked much less spend any
time incarcerated. Get caught driving drunk, and God forbid you should
have an accident and injure or kill someone while drunk, in any of
several European or Scandinavian countries.
|
1120.30 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Don't hurry, be happy! | Tue Jun 19 1990 11:16 | 33 |
| re .all: I was in vacation so couldn't answer earlier (spent about 15%
of my vacation days for 2 weeks in Italy..):
The facility where I work in Munich (UFC) has only non-alcoholic beer
in the vending machines. The other wing of the building (UFH, where the
training center is) as well as all other locations in Munich have real
beer (95% alcohol-free :-) in the machines. Beer is served in all
cafeterias. The cost is ~60c for a bottle (0.5 l or ~1 pint). The
more or less private fridges around the building also contain a fair
selection of beer, wine, etc.
I have no idea of how much the vending machine sales per person is; at
least in the cafeteria, you see only maybe 10-15% of the people
drinking beer with their meals, wine or something else almost
non-existent.
And although having a beer is considered absolutely normal there are of
course limits: e.g. having one right in the morning or several with your
meal might cause a few raised eyebrows. Besides, working under
influence is legally forbidden.
re driving: yes, the penalties are quite stiff in most Northen and
Central European countries and starting to get more so in the Southern
European countries. A first time offender will definitely loose his
licence for 6-9 months in Germany, along with a fine of ~$1000 - 2000.
Repeat offenders have a good chance of losing their licence for good.
E.g. the annual DEC Munich family picnic (where alcohol is served) has
a shuttle bus running to the location (whicht tends to change annually)
from downtown Munich or nearest public transport, and people are
encouraged to use it instead of their private cars. Other events
usually take place on DEC premises where puiblic transport is readily
available.
|
1120.31 | My kingdom for a horse! | PINION::DMCLURE | Do the *best* thing | Mon Aug 27 1990 12:13 | 17 |
| I doubt that the U.S. regulations are so much based upon puritan
mores or whatever as they are on the driving issue. The way life is
here in the corporate facilities of New England anyway is such that
one needs to drive to get anywhere. There is no such thing as public
transportation in the Boston burbs (aside from the rarely-used and
somewhat obscure van commuter pools). As such, even for Digital events
involving a bus to downtown, etc., there is still a certain amount of
individual driving involved to get from home to the bus and back.
I think that if instead we were located downtown or someplace where
we could all mostly ride a train to work (as is the case in some U.S.
sales offices I have visited such as Chicago), then drinking at lunch
or on the way home would not be such a big deal. I often wonder whether
life wasn't as little more civilized back in the days when your horse
could do most of the driving while you enjoyed yourself on the way home.
-davo
|
1120.32 | not culture, just CYA | SA1794::CHARBONND | in the dark the innocent can't see | Mon Aug 27 1990 17:14 | 6 |
| It's a liability question - if DEC condoned drinking, and
an employee accidentally killed someone while under the
influence, DEC could be held liable. Lawyers have wet dreams
about such cases. By formally condemning alcohol use, DEC
can say under those circumstances that the employee was in
violation of company policy, and escape liability.
|
1120.33 | impaired = impaired | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Tue Aug 28 1990 10:06 | 5 |
| I think .32 is probably right. Anyhow, if a person is too drunk to
drive safely, he/she is probably also too drunk to perform useful work
productively as well. Save the indulgence for after hours or days off.
/Charlotte
|
1120.34 | | MU::PORTER | it's 4AM inside my mind... | Tue Aug 28 1990 23:13 | 12 |
| re .32
Then it *is* a cultural issue.
Most (?) places, if you get drunk and do damage, it's your fault.
In the USA, it's apparently someone else's fault.
[I don't understand why liability stops with the person who
sold/gave you the beer. Personally, I'd blame the farmer
who grew the barley...]
|
1120.35 | | MARVIN::COCKBURN | nemo me impune lacessit | Wed Aug 29 1990 07:00 | 17 |
|
Re .32
Well then, can't parties with alchohol be made by ticket only, and each
ticket saying that Digital does not accept responsibility ?
Talk about nanny legislation.
Give it a few more years of this paranoia and car manufacturers
will be held responsible for making fast cars rather than the
individuals who drive them and cause accidents. 'Sorry officer
that I was speeding, but legislation allowed the car to be made
to travel at that speed, so blame the manufacturer for allowing
the car to break the speed limit'
Craig.
|
1120.36 | | MU::PORTER | it's 4AM inside my mind... | Wed Aug 29 1990 20:52 | 9 |
| re .33
And another thing: there seems to be an implict assumption in here
that "if there's beer at work, people will get drunk". To judge
by the notes written from locations where they DO sell alcohol in
DEC, that doesn't happen.
If the problem that you want to avoid is drunken employees, make
rules against drunken employees. Or is that too obvious to work?
|
1120.37 | liability is a monster | HEFTY::CHARBONND | in the dark the innocent can't see | Thu Aug 30 1990 10:35 | 3 |
| re .35 and cars - it's been tried. Smith & Wesson gets sued
*regularly* because someone gets hurt by one of their products.
No :-)
|
1120.38 | Priorities? | HYEND::DMONTGOMERY | | Thu Aug 30 1990 10:52 | 5 |
| I'd say that drunken employees are considerably less threat to
Digital's welfare than stupid employees. Digital does a wonderful job
of avoiding the former. The latter? Hmmmm....
-DM-
|
1120.39 | | PSW::WINALSKI | Careful with that VAX, Eugene | Thu Aug 30 1990 20:07 | 13 |
| RE:.31, .32
The rules about liquor consumption here and at other companies such as IBM
predate both the ridiculous liability rulings and the current social
consciousness about drunk driving.
RE: .36
I don't think there's any assumption about drunkenness. This thing is
completely a cultural bias.
--PSW
|
1120.40 | | MU::PORTER | it's 4AM inside my mind... | Fri Aug 31 1990 00:07 | 5 |
| re .39 re .36
By "implicit assumption here" I meant "implicit assumption
made by some respondents to this note" that the availability
of beer means that people will get drunk.
|
1120.41 | Risk-free Beer | POWDML::D_FITZGERALD | | Fri Aug 31 1990 09:27 | 6 |
| Why not offer non-alcoholic beers in the caf? Bud, Miller and others
have found a new marketplace which is literally booming in the U.S. I
believe that Becks has also entered the market.
It seems that if people are looking for a particular taste, it can be
accomodated without worrying the lawyers.
|
1120.42 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Aug 31 1990 10:49 | 4 |
| re .-1:
There may be a shortage of the stuff, now that it's being shipped to our
boys (and girls?) in Saudi Arabia.
|
1120.43 | Something I Read Somewhere A Long Time Ago ... | BOSACT::EARLY | Are we having FUN yet? | Fri Aug 31 1990 23:18 | 16 |
|
"It has come to our attention that some employees are imbibing in
alcoholic beverages over the lunch hour and then calling on customers
in the afternoon. In order to disguise the fact that they have been
drinking, we have learned, the drink of choice appears to be vodka,
which is harder to detect on the breath.
Management requests that all employees engaged in drinking alcohol at
lunch switch to something with a more potent smell, like scotch or gin.
We would much rather have our clients know that you're a drunk than to
think we hire stupid people."
:^)
/se
|
1120.44 | is there a hidden agenda? | BCSE::KREFETZ | Reality is the fiction we live by. | Wed Sep 05 1990 11:04 | 6 |
| I notice that the Jack Smith memo prohibiting the use of DEC moneys in
purchasing bottled water and the Wall Street Journal did not prohibit
the use of such moneys in purchasing bottled beer and USA Today. Is
there a message in this?
Elliott
|
1120.45 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy Leslie, Free Spirit | Wed Sep 05 1990 11:29 | 4 |
| Yes, pedantry is petty.
/andy/
|
1120.46 | | PSW::WINALSKI | Careful with that VAX, Eugene | Fri Sep 07 1990 19:33 | 6 |
| RE: .44
There was a clarification from Jack Smith's office. The prohibition applies to
all on-site purchased beverages and to all periodical subscriptions.
--PSW
|
1120.47 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Sun Sep 09 1990 12:18 | 9 |
| One wonders whether the prohibition on purchasing bottled water applies to
facilities such as HLO, where there is (claimed to be) a known health problem
with the local water.
While working there, every once in a while I would forget and use the coolers
connected to the water mains instead of the Belmont Springs bubblers, and have
to run to a Belmont Springs bubbler to wash out my mouth.
/john
|
1120.48 | Survival of the smartest? | COUNT0::WELSH | Tom Welsh, freelance CASE Consultant | Mon Sep 10 1990 04:09 | 12 |
| re .47:
>>> every once in a while I would forget and use the coolers
>>> connected to the water mains instead of the Belmont Springs bubblers,
>>> and have to run to a Belmont Springs bubbler to wash out my mouth.
Hey, wait a minute! Don't you guys have a Health and Safety Program
over there? If so, how can it condone water coolers that dispense
dangerous water? (Or is it a sophisticated scheme to eliminate
those dumb enough to drink from them?)
/Tom
|
1120.49 | HLO not on the town water supply\ | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Mon Sep 10 1990 10:30 | 13 |
| As far as I know this site (HLO) has its own wells. I live within
sight of this building, and my water at home is fine (unless you don't
like the high manganese level - sometimes stains stuff blue), but the
water in HLO has a distinct unpleasant taste, plus a high rust content.
There practically aren't any water fountains here anyhow - the nearest
one I can think of is way over by the credit union, which is in the
other building. Anyhow, our area water machine is also the local
refrigerator, and with everyone trying to stretch their lunch money
these days, if you get in after quarter of nine, your lunch usually is
going to not get refrigerated because the rest of us have filled the
machine before you - so I hope they don't take away the water machine!
/Charlotte
|
1120.50 | HL wells for process support only | TLE::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Mon Sep 10 1990 10:42 | 6 |
| Re .49:
The excruciatingly detailed story of the wells at HL which was published in
"Mountaintop Views" (?) a few years ago stated that the wells were used solely
for process purposes - not for drinking water.
/AHM
|
1120.51 | Water, water everywhere... | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:04 | 6 |
| The way I remember the DVN broadcast, Jack Smith stated that the water had
been found to be safe at all sites in the Greater Maynard Area. Please note
that me memory has been known to be faulty (no parity bits), and that "safe"
doesn't mean that you'd want to drink it. BTW, I drink the water at ZKO
with no complaint, although others avoid it. My taste buds have been ruined
since I moved from NYC to MA.
|
1120.52 | Maybe the problem is inside the water fountains (bleah) | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:38 | 8 |
| Unless, I'm mistaken, Charlotte, there are water fountains right by the
restrooms around the corner from the office area you're in. Those are the
ones I would occasionally accidentally take a sip from.
The fountains at ZKO are not as sweet-tasting as New York City water, but
they are drastically better than HLO (spit-spit).
/john
|