T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1053.1 | Not Digital's fault | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Mon Mar 19 1990 14:24 | 19 |
| If some other company was moving your roomate do you think they
would help you move? I doubt it. There is no difference between
that case and this one. You're agreement regarding your living
where you do now is between your landlord and you. Digital has
no business getting involved there. Likewise, if the house was
being bought by someone else would you feel that Digital owed you?
Of course, Digital is not buying the house anyway. A company that
Digital does business with does the actual buying. Digital is not
your new landlord.
Do I think Digital owes you something in this case? No. They are
not asking you to move. You are moving on your own. The house is
for sale, you don't want to move? Buy it.
BTW, is Digital forcing your roommate to move? If not than its
their fault not Digital's that they're moving and the house is
for sale.
Alfred
|
1053.2 | technically correct, however | ODIXIE::CARNELL | DTN 385-2901 David Carnell @ALF | Mon Mar 19 1990 15:28 | 17 |
|
Ref: 1053.1 by Alfred Thompson
Your response is technically correct.
However, $200 to move again appears to be a significant amount of money
for this individual, which perhaps is not readily at hand. And this
person is presumably a full-time Digital employee. Thus, is there not
some ethical obligation as preached by this corporation TO ASSIST in
some creative way in helping this employee relocate, and not just say,
"Hey, that's YOUR personal problem and you're on your own."
Is there not a place for compassion within Digital in how we treat our
own employees?
|
1053.3 | Why didn't they have a lease-type agreement? | MINAR::BISHOP | | Mon Mar 19 1990 17:14 | 13 |
| Look, the real beef is with the "roommate", who is actually
a landlord (as the owner of the condo). I can understand why
one might rather blame a big company than a friend, but the
trouble is coming from that person's decision to move. Was
there no lease? Was there no discussion of moving-out conditions
and how long in advance notice would be given? Whose fault is
that? This is the kind of thing which friends _have_ to get
settled beforehand if they want to avoid bad situations and
hard feelings.
The company is not involved at all in this.
-John Bishop
|
1053.4 | | DEC25::BRUNO | I avoid clich�s like the plague! | Mon Mar 19 1990 17:30 | 7 |
| RE: .3
I fully agree. The problem is not caused by Digital, it is caused
by the roommate/landlord deciding to relocate. Any assistance should
come from them or nobody.
Greg
|
1053.5 | ethics | ODIXIE::CARNELL | DTN 385-2901 David Carnell @ALF | Tue Mar 20 1990 08:42 | 7 |
|
When a landlord sells a rental property to a new landlord, and the new
landlord, for whatever reason, wants the tenant to leave, does not the
new landlord have some ethical obligation to provide some monies to
compensate for relocation expense to the tenant who is being asked to
move? I submit that "ethically" the answer is yes.
|
1053.6 | plan ahead ... | ATLACT::GIBSON_D | | Tue Mar 20 1990 09:05 | 7 |
| re .5
It's the old landlord who MAY have the ethical problem, not the new
one. Friends may be involved, but these are basically business
dealings. And yes, it can be perceived as unfair or that the best
decisions were not made by all parties. If Gail had signed a long-term
rental agreement, then the new landlord may have had to buy her out --
perhaps solving her move problem.
|
1053.7 | | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Tue Mar 20 1990 12:29 | 11 |
| RE: .2 I have compassion for the author of .0. I really do. At the
same time I don't see any justification for making Digital pay to
move her. As others have said, if there is a lease than that spells
out all kinds of things including responsibility in the event the
house is sold. If there is no lease than I would argue that the
landlord may very well have some moral obligation to help. I know I
would feel some. It's not Digital's fault this happened. It's the
landlords. The landlord has the most to gain (financially) from
this whole thing why aren't they being asked to help?
Alfred
|
1053.8 | wanna help me move? | XCUSME::KOSKI | This NOTE's for you | Tue Mar 20 1990 16:37 | 20 |
| Thank you for the input. It's difficult to see all sides when you
are involved. My landlord/roomie is not a friend, so that is not
an issue. The short agreement that I signed was filled with
stipulations about my half of the bargain, ie: month-month agreement
one months notice. In essence I am getting that one month notice
back at me. In consideration of what has been discussed, I'll have
to agree that legally neither Digital nor the roommate "owes" me
anything. After discussing it with the roommate, she has decided
to forgo my rent for the month of April, this is some form of
acceptable compensation. I am trying to believe that 4 months ago
(when I moved in) that she was not contemplating moving. But that
issue has nothing to do with this note.
I still think that Digital could shoulder some responsibility,
considering they probably agreed to move her household, and I'm
part of it! ;^) Oh well guess I'll just try to get some free boxes.
Thanks,
Gail
|
1053.9 | I come equipped with a terminal and modem too. :-) | STAR::MFOLEY | Jammin with Bill and Ted | Tue Mar 20 1990 22:53 | 5 |
|
I've got a sofa-bed you can crash on Gail.. :-)
mike
|
1053.10 | | DELREY::WEYER_JI | Make Sense, not Cents | Wed Mar 21 1990 19:49 | 16 |
| I am happy for you that your landlord decided to waive the
April rent - you're quite lucky, really, because as I've read
through the other replies it looks like nobody owes you anything.
As for Digital offering any assistance, if you got in a jam you
could try the "Employee Assistance Program". I have a friend here
who arranged for some cash during a desperate time - in the form
of a loan. There is also the method of getting an advance on your
paycheck, but I think that is only if you are taking vacation time
and want your pay up front.
Try to get a long term lease from your next landlord (unless YOU
plan to move in a few months).
Bye,
-Jill-
|
1053.11 | This still troubles me... | CADSYS::BAY | CNF ENTP PP | Thu Mar 22 1990 15:50 | 37 |
| Personally, I think this is one of those DEC culture things that is not
being taken into account.
I agree that legally, MAYBE even ethically, there are no obligations or
committments in this situation. However, I question how many companies
HAVE problems like this.
When I want to sell something, I do it in the Notesfile or one of the
local newsletters. When I want to buy something, I go to Notesfiles
for advice. I have found MANY sources of new and used items this way.
When I was looking for apartments and/or roomates, again I went to the
Notesfiles. I have had two Deccie roomates, both of which worked (are
working) out well. I have NEVER nor would I EVER advertise for a
roomate, or give out my address to some stranger. But I have little
problem doing this with a Deccie. In all the other jobs and companies
I have worked for I have only had one other roomate, who was a
coworker.
My point is that we do things DIFFERENTLY here at DEC. We depend on
the resources, like the Enet and Notesfiles that we have available.
How many people in DEC have or have had DEC roomates? How does that
compare to other companies? Not well, I imagine.
Ok, fine. Having access to the net is a perk that we are free to use
or ignore. But in a sense, DEC put it there, and all the broo-ha-ha
lately about our liability, etc. comes from the way we use those
Notesfiles.
I'm not saying DEC has any responsibility here - its not my province to
determine. But I think it certainly bears thinking about.
Gail, best of luck. If I hadn't already taken in a roomate to help out
in time of need, then I'd at least offer.
Jim (who feels, in these troubled times, that "there, but for the grace
of God...")
|
1053.12 | Not A Digital Problem | MURFY::EARLY | Are we having FUN yet? | Fri Mar 23 1990 19:32 | 26 |
| I think I am usually a proponent of the employee, and have fought
numerous battles for employee rights for people that I thought were
getting the proverbial shaft.
I must say in this case, Digital owes the employee absolutely nothing.
To suggest that we do is ridiculous. I was an apartment dweller and a
comdominium dweller for a good number of years in my professional life.
I've been moved (or chose to move) all over the country, from East
coast to West coast and numerous cities in between. When I was single
and had roommates, I always tried to keep my roommates informed of any
potential/impending moves. Never once did I feel that I should
compensate my roommate because I decided to move, and I most certainly
did not ever feel that the company I worked for owed my roommate
anything.
This is part of life. It may seem "unfair" or create some financial
hardship for you, but it's not anything that the company owes you
for. I feel sorry for you in your position, but can't see how the
company has any liability to bail you out.
/se
|