T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
983.2 | | EAGLE1::BRUNNER | VAX Vector Architecture | Sat Dec 16 1989 14:45 | 2 |
| At BXB1 and BXB2, the FAX machines are accessible 24 hours a day PROVIDING
you know which offices the machines are currently hidden in ...
|
983.3 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Somewhere, the sun is setting... | Sat Dec 16 1989 18:02 | 3 |
| A MessageRouter<->FAX gateway exists.
At least we sell a product called MRFAX,
|
983.4 | Not yet we don't... | HABS11::MASON | Explaining is not understanding | Sat Dec 16 1989 18:24 | 1 |
|
|
983.5 | ask the guards | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Sat Dec 16 1989 20:22 | 2 |
| The fax machine in CX01 is in the mail room. The security guards will
open the mail room to let you use it.
|
983.7 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Cassandra | Sun Dec 17 1989 06:38 | 2 |
| re: .3 Sorry, didn't mean to preannounce the product, heard about it at
least 2-3 years ago, so assumed it was out by now...
|
983.8 | at least you have one! | DPDMAI::RITZ | PRIVATE PILOT ASEL!!! | Mon Dec 18 1989 09:44 | 7 |
| A fax machine has been deemed too expensive in our office.
We just overnight mail everything at $xx.nn/day. That budget
looks good though.
rr
|
983.9 | | PRAVDA::JACKSON | King Cynic | Tue Dec 19 1989 10:08 | 16 |
| Any cost center can buy a FAX machine, if they are justified. We receive
over 10 FAXes per day (sometimes more) from various sources, and the
Mailroom in the Mill was just too slow in getting them to us.
(if they called and you weren't here, they put them in interoffice mail!)
However, (this is a waste watch category!) you must buy one of the
corporate approved FAX machines, which average around $1200 each (there
are two or three) instead of going to Lechemere and picking up a $500.00
machine.
Oh well...
-bill
|
983.10 | | STAR::STUMPF | I picked the wrong release to stop sniffing glue. | Tue Dec 19 1989 12:31 | 6 |
| What costs are incurred by owning a FAX machine? How much more is it than a
phone call to the FAX site? Is there a base rate to be paid each month? Until
I get the answers to these questions it seems very short-sided to pay about $10
for express mail when you could fax the same document in seconds.
-ken
|
983.11 | Some charges... | SERENA::DONM | | Tue Dec 19 1989 12:42 | 7 |
| :: What costs are incurred by owning a FAX machine?
= Capital outlay for machine
= Maintenance costs
= Supplies (paper, toner)
= Depreciation of capital asset
= Telephone charges
|
983.12 | | PRAVDA::JACKSON | King Cynic | Wed Dec 20 1989 08:09 | 20 |
| RE: .9
The major cost after buying the machine is supplies. The paper is still
the heat-sensitive stuff that used to be used in copiers until they
invented plain-paper copiers. They haven't yet done that with FAX machines.
The telephone line is a simple telephone, which costs no more than
any other phone in your department. These things behave like modems
and answer/dial the phone when you're using them.
Someone told me once that the cost to send something that was 3 pages
was about $5.00 or so. Remember though, you're really only paying
for the INCOMING FAX, because the cost of supplies is the overwhelming
majority of the cost. When you send someone something, they pay for
the printing.
-bill
|
983.13 | Try a Xerox | JGO::EVANS | | Wed Dec 20 1989 09:24 | 5 |
| re .11
Rank Xerox among others sell fax machines that use plain paper.
j.e.
|
983.16 | topic re-opened | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Thu Dec 21 1989 15:06 | 5 |
| RE: .14 The costs associated with using any resource have a direct
relationship with how access to that resource is controlled. Cost
questions seem quite to the the point of this topic.
Alfred
|
983.17 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | International House of Workstations | Thu Dec 21 1989 16:40 | 6 |
| Help me out someone... Did locking up the FAX machines start because of
some really abusive incident, or is this based on the speculation that
there might be some abuse if the machine were left unlocked?
In our New York office, we don't lock up pencils, toner, copiers, fax
machines, phones, etc., I guess we're too busy.
|
983.19 | | BLUMON::QUODLING | Oooooh, Nice Software.... | Fri Dec 22 1989 11:36 | 16 |
| re .-1
>I would hope that some similar product will someday be introduced that can
>interface with DDIF; then you could have your FAX routed right to your own
>system by a FAX receptionist. Paperless FAX reception.
This, combined with proper X.400/X.500 implementation across the
corporation would be a god-send. The Message Router to Telex
Gateway already exists, and I am sure that someone has done some
work already with Fax interfacing. I know that in Australia, I was
able to send x.400 mail to an address incantation, and it would
turn my ascii text into a fax and deliver it...
q
|
983.20 | Mail to FAX is doable, though I haven't tried it myself | TELGAR::WAKEMANLA | Another Eye Crossing Question! | Fri Dec 22 1989 12:17 | 13 |
| From All-In-1
To:
First Last@1=US@2=MCI@*EMS\FAX@*MBX1\PHONE:nnn-nnn-nnnn@MRX_MCI@OGO
From VaxMail
MTS$::"OGO::MRX_MCI::1=US::2=MCI::*EMS\FAX::*MBX\PHONE:nnn-nnn-nnnn"
My reference is the MTS/X.400 Electronic Mail Addressing Guide. Contact
Frank Kaminsky @OGO for more information.
Larry
|
983.21 | Correction to VAXmail Address | TELGAR::WAKEMANLA | Another Eye Crossing Question! | Fri Dec 22 1989 12:19 | 5 |
| MTS$::"OGO::MRX_MCI::1=US::2=MCI::*EMS\FAX::*MBX\PHONE:nnn-nnn-nnnn::First Last"
Ugly aren't they, sorry about the long lines
Larry
|
983.25 | Mail to FAX Access | RIPPLE::KOTTERRI | Rich Kotter | Tue Dec 26 1989 15:25 | 13 |
| Since topic 983 has been write locked, I am beginning a new topic.
Re: Note 983.19 and 983.20 by TELGAR::WAKEMANLA
> Mail to FAX is doable
For what it is worth, I tried sending a test message to a FAX, using
the syntax that was shown in your notes. I got an rejection notice from
MTS that I was not authorized to use the gateway. I have sent mail to
Frank Kaminsky, whom you mentioned in your note, to see what it takes
to get authorized to use the gateway.
Rich
|
983.24 | It could be worse... | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Dec 26 1989 15:47 | 4 |
| Until recently, Spit Brook didn't even HAVE a FAX machine! Instead one had
to use the one at NUO, about 10 minutes away!
Steve
|
983.26 | (And I moved reply .24 from a separate note) | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Dec 26 1989 15:52 | 4 |
| I have (once again) reopened this topic. It is the opinion of the moderators
that there exists no valid reason for closing it.
Steve
|
983.27 | | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Wed Dec 27 1989 10:57 | 4 |
| References in this topic prior to this reply are likely to be off
by 1 do to some housekeeping. Sorry for any problems this may cause.
Alfred
|
983.28 | Mail Access to External Communcations Services | RIPPLE::KOTTERRI | Rich Kotter | Wed Dec 27 1989 11:51 | 29 |
| With regard to sending from Mail to FAX, I received a very rapid
response from Frank Kaminsky @OGO. He sent me forms that need to be
completed by the subscriber and approved by the cost center manager, in
order to become authorized for access to the X.400 gateway, which
provides electronic mail access to the following external
communications capabilities: FAX, Electronic Mail, Telex, and Hardcopy
via Postal System.
According to his message, the current costs for this service are as
follows:
Fixed Costs
-----------
$26.00 per month for running and maintaining the X.400 gateway
$10.00 annually for MCI registration
Variable Costs
--------------
Electronic Mail - $0.45 plus $0.05/1000 characters
FAX - Domestic $0.80/page, International by destination country,
Not charged for cover page, distribution list or retries
Telex - Standard telex rate by destination
Hardcopy via Postal System - Domestic $2.00 up to 3 pages $1.00 each
additional page, International $5.50 up to 3 pages $1.00 each
additional page
|
983.18 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Wed Dec 27 1989 18:16 | 21 |
| I'm sure the FAX is locked up because the mailroom is locked up, and the FAX
is located there.
Now you'd think it could be left on unattended for receiving documents
overnight, but that's not necessarily so, for reasons beyond DEC's control:
1. Paper jams may cause a mess, but more importantly:
2. There are bozos out there sending junk FAXes that waste lots
and lots of supplies. When unattended, there is no way to
control this.
Now, if you look in the latest DAK catalog, you'll see a device that hooks
up to an IBM PC that receives FAXes, displays them on the screen, and allows
you to print only the ones you want.
I would hope that some similar product will someday be introduced that can
interface with DDIF; then you could have your FAX routed right to your own
system by a FAX receptionist. Paperless FAX reception.
/john
|
983.29 | MR-FAX | XANADU::MORRIS | Tom Morris | Wed Jan 03 1990 20:58 | 6 |
| Anyone interested in more information on a future Digital product which
does "paperless fax reception" (and transmission), DDIF, X.400, and all
the other good stuff mentioned in .18 and .19 should check out the
LEROUF::MR-FAX conference.
Tom
|
983.30 | Success | RIPPLE::KOTTERRI | Rich Kotter | Wed Jan 10 1990 14:16 | 4 |
| For what it's worth, after being registered for access to the gateway,
I have been able to successfully send from Email to FAX addresses.
Frank Kaminsky @OGO was most helpful in sending me the stuff to get
registered.
|
983.31 | | EXIT26::STRATTON | I (heart) my wife | Wed Feb 07 1990 22:41 | 10 |
| A few of the replies in this topic refer to an unannounced
product called MR-FAX. The replies had been hidden. However,
the product management has chosen to announce a conference on
MR-FAX (see .29) and so the notes have been unhidden.
Remember, though, that the product IS unannounced, and
shouldn't be discussed with non-Digital employees.
Jim Stratton, co-moderator, DIGITAL
|