T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
971.1 | On-line DEC dictionary | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Fri Nov 17 1989 16:22 | 5 |
| Doesn't the DIGITAL Dictionary hold acronyms? Perhaps an on-line
copy of that would do? A BOOKREADER version with a good index
would do the job to workstation users.
Alfred
|
971.2 | a real need | SX4GTO::BERNARD | Dave from Cleveland | Fri Nov 17 1989 17:01 | 5 |
|
Good idea, and why not take it even a step farther- instead of only
limiting it to acronyms, list abreviations, too.
Dave
|
971.3 | FWIW | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Fri Nov 17 1989 17:50 | 3 |
| RE .0
You mean an ATU which takes a TLA and returns OSMs?
|
971.4 | Fight for clarity...stamp out acronyms | TIPPLE::MIANO | I'm outta that place!!!! | Fri Nov 17 1989 22:43 | 12 |
| RE: .0
When a speaker relies heavily on acronyms why not ask what they mean?
You know the old saying about a fool being the one who doesn't ask
questions. It has been my experience that people who use acronymns
heavily are usually B.S.ers. Why not ask the emperor about his clothes?
During my 4th class year at West Point we were not allowed to use
acronyms at all. Why not make a valiant attempt to stamp them out
in DEC, I mean Digital Equipment Corporation.
John
|
971.5 | | STAR::ROBERT | | Sat Nov 18 1989 09:42 | 1 |
| Use ELF V2?
|
971.6 | | TROA01::MSCHNEIDER | What .... me worry? | Sat Nov 18 1989 21:01 | 8 |
| Seems alot of people have forgotten some basic facts of communication.
It's ok to use acronyms, but it is proper and polite that the full
wording is given (e.g. Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC)) before any
subsequent usage of the acronym.
We get so caught up with our acronyms that we constantly use them in
front of our customers without even realizing it. It's bad manners
plain and simple!
|
971.7 | The obvious answer! | LENO::GRIER | mjg's holistic computing agency | Sun Nov 19 1989 16:53 | 7 |
| Re: .5:
You beat me to it...
-mjg
|
971.8 | A Virtual Memory System solution | VMSDEV::HALLYB | The Smart Money was on Goliath | Mon Nov 20 1989 12:45 | 12 |
| Perhaps NaC� can develop a network-wide Acronym Server, then DCL�
could implement an F$ACRONYM lexical that could then provide the
translation upon request. That would solve the problem for most
users, except those who are tied to ALL-IN-1, which would require
a separate non-DCL� solution from BOSE�.
John
----------------
�Networks and Communications
�Digital Command Language
�The people who develop ALL-IN-1
|
971.9 | F$DECRONYM("DCL","Most_Common_Meaning_please") | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy ��� Leslie | Mon Nov 20 1989 16:22 | 1 |
| Thats DECRONYM, of course....
|
971.10 | ...as found in the DECtionary | SNOC02::SIMPSON | Those whom the Gods would destroy... | Tue Nov 21 1989 01:15 | 1 |
|
|
971.11 | small numbers | MUSKIE::BLACK | I always run out of time and space to finish .. | Tue Nov 21 1989 13:22 | 8 |
|
For ALL-IN-1 users, the dictionaries could be made to work for both
incoming and outgoing messages and some definitions added ...
But who cares about that, I wnat to know where the little bitty
1,2 and 3 came from in .8
|
971.12 | | ESCROW::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Tue Nov 21 1989 13:29 | 7 |
| Re .11:
Try
[compose-character]^3
|
971.13 | hokay...senior, now what? | NWD002::EVANS_BR | | Tue Nov 21 1989 16:35 | 9 |
|
Sorry to digress, but I tried Compose+Ctrl-3+1 (or +2, +3) and got
"Key NONAME currently has no definition". Also tried
Compose+Shift-3 <gives # sign>, and Compose+Shift-6+3 <also bogus...>
So give... what's the real secret??? Oh yeah - this done on a
DECwindows VT3xx emulator VS2000
I think the numbers are cute too!! Effective!
|
971.14 | | THRUST::THISSELL | George Thissell | Tue Nov 21 1989 17:08 | 9 |
| try 1)compose
2) ^ (that's a capital 6)
3) 3
like �
George
|
971.15 | ��������������������������������������������� | ZPOSWS::HWCHOY | DU:IT here I come! | Tue Nov 21 1989 17:22 | 12 |
| re .14
� (that's a capital 6)
becareful, not all keyboards are the same. eg the european keyboards
have a different layout.
� �'�'�
I believe the compose doesn't work on DECwindows terminal emulators.
HW
|
971.16 | This too confused me at first... | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Nov 21 1989 18:46 | 6 |
| On DECwindows, the key you see as "Compose" is now "Alt". To get the
compose key function, hold down the Alt (Compose) key and press the space
bar. Let them both go. The Compose light will be on. Now type the
characters that make up your compose sequence.
Steve
|
971.17 | DOS EM CEE PEE EM CEE or PEE? | CGOA01::DTHOMPSON | Don, of Don's ACT | Tue Nov 21 1989 21:06 | 13 |
| That is, of course, unless you're editing your note with DECwrite
which, as many applications do, uses the Alt key as an Alt key and
not as a Compose key. Add to that the confusion between ^1 and
Ctrl-1, not to mention that Alt itself has been called other things
in the past like 'super shift' and soon we will discover why noone
has yet jumped up to provide the Acronym Translator.
Now let me see, is that 'VEE EM ESS' or 'VEE EMs'? And why is Rdb
an RDBMS but DBMS is not? Shouldn't 80% the same beat 60%? Is
OH ESS TWO like OH ESS or is it a different O.S.? Come to think
of it, is MS-DOS like DOS-VS or DOS it really matter?
Sorry, couldn't help myself on the last one.
|
971.18 | Oh never mind | HWSSS0::SZETO | Simon Szeto @HGO, Hongkong | Wed Nov 22 1989 06:21 | 7 |
| I was going to issue a rat-hole alert but when I back-noted to .8 where
the rat hole started, I noticed a common error in footnote usage. The
error is ... (oops, I guess I really shouldn't get into that and start
another rat hole).
--Simon
|
971.19 | The UK has invented the wheel | CHEFS::CONWAY | | Wed Nov 22 1989 08:49 | 5 |
| An extensive list of Acronyms and their translations already exists
on UK National VTX. It is maintained by Geoff Rippington @UCG dtn
781-4170 who, having spoken to him, I know would be pleased, either
to receive further contributions or to make it more widely available.
|
971.20 | Waiter, some bait please | VMSDEV::HALLYB | The Smart Money was on Goliath | Wed Nov 22 1989 11:17 | 10 |
| .18> I noticed a common error in footnote usage. The
.18> error is ... (oops, I guess I really shouldn't get into that
Oh, come on, Simon� -- DO tell us!
John
------------------
�Simon, curiously enough, is old Taigorain for "He who notices well"
(maybe it was an acronym :-)
|
971.21 | | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Wed Nov 22 1989 14:14 | 3 |
| I'd guess he's referring to the� practice of footnoting the� same word twice.
�It's still the same word, no matter how often you make reference to it.
|
971.22 | YANC perhaps? (yet another notes conference) | SCAACT::RESENDE | We never criticize the competition directly. | Sat Nov 25 1989 18:27 | 7 |
| Why not set up (yet another, sigh) Notes conference called "DEC_ACRONYMS" and
create a topic for every one of them ..... with as many replies as necessary to
provide all the definitions?
We all needed another to track :-)
Steve
|
971.23 | not notes "VTX ELF"!!!!! | SCCAT::HARVEY | | Mon Nov 27 1989 14:18 | 4 |
| We would most likely get a ELF V2 compatable interface instead of
a DEC_ACRONYMS conference....
:-) Renis
|
971.24 | What are IMHO and FWIW? | KISHOR::HEIMANN | David Heimann,DTN240-6409,AET1-2/7 | Mon Jan 08 1990 13:29 | 14 |
| Speaking of acronyms, I see several informal ones in NOTES files from time
to time. Some of them I've heard before; BTW -- By the way, CU -- See
you, or FYI -- For Your Information. What, however, do the following two
mean?
IMHO
FWIW
Are there any other such acronyms to know about?
Thanks,
David
|
971.25 | re: .24 | DELREY::PEDERSON_PA | yeah...but it's a DRY heat! | Mon Jan 08 1990 13:37 | 4 |
| IMHO = In My Humble Opinion
FWIW = For What It's Worth
|
971.26 | or... | MEMV03::HADDAD | | Mon Jan 08 1990 16:03 | 3 |
| IMHO = In My Head Only
Bruce
|
971.27 | IMHO alternatives | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Wed Jan 10 1990 18:32 | 5 |
| IMHO = In My Hubristic Opinion,
which is exactly the opposite of
IMHO = In My Humble Opinion
|
971.28 | Here's another one | KISHOR::HEIMANN | Black holes--God divides by zero! | Thu Jan 11 1990 11:46 | 7 |
| Here's another "notes" acronym I just saw -- BWTF. What does this
mean?
FWIW,
David
|
971.29 | I could tell you... | WORDY::JONG | Steve Jong/NaC Pubs | Thu Jan 11 1990 12:14 | 3 |
| ... but what the f*** would you want to know for?
Sorry, I think that's what it means.
|
971.30 | | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Go Bruins!! | Thu Jan 11 1990 13:39 | 2 |
| how about "sic", usually used in parens "(sic)"??
|
971.31 | | WMOIS::FULTI | | Thu Jan 11 1990 13:44 | 12 |
| > how about "sic", usually used in parens "(sic)"??
This is not an acronym but, an actual word....
From the dict.
SIC adv. Thus; so. Used in written texts to indicate that a surprising quotation
is not a mistake and is to be read as it stands.
- George
Sometimes I believe people use it (sic) to indicate that the spelling may be
incorrect and to pronounce the word/name phonically.
|
971.32 | Siccing "sic" on the unwary | WORDY::JONG | Steve Jong/NaC Pubs | Thu Jan 11 1990 14:29 | 10 |
| I rathole:
"sic" is Latin, and means, in effect, "this is not my error." Often used
editorially in newspapers, for example:
The statement continued, "We then proceed (sic) to the corner."
By the way, "sic" can be used as a subtle editorial weapon to ridicule
others. I've seen it used on critical letters to the editor,
nitpicking the letter-writer's submission to death with "(sic)"s.
|
971.33 | "thus" | REGENT::POWERS | | Fri Jan 12 1990 08:33 | 7 |
| > "sic" is Latin, and means, in effect, "this is not my error."
Literally, 'sic' means 'thus', and is used to indicate that the error
(or whatever) in quoted text was expressed as shown ("thusly")...
discussed in more length in JOKUR::GRAMMAR and probably ASKENET archives
and JOYOFLEX.....
|
971.34 | And further down the hole we go... | DNEAST::SIMON_ANDY | He who dies with most toys wins | Mon Jan 15 1990 17:57 | 2 |
| FWIW, IMHO "(SIC)" is an Abbr. for " Spelling Is Correct ". It just
happens to have a similar latin meaning.
|
971.35 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Mon Jan 15 1990 19:41 | 5 |
| Hmmm. Note .34 is very interesting.
John Wilkes Boothe shouted, "Sic semper tyrannus," as he
shot Abraham Lincoln. I had no idea (until .34) that the
phrase meant something like, "Tyrants always spell correctly."
|
971.36 | Rathole continued .. | JUMBLY::DAY | No Good Deed Goes Unpunished | Tue Jan 16 1990 04:42 | 10 |
| There are quite a few sics about, lurking in the nether regions
of the English language. Sic transit gloria mundi for example.
(I ran into Gloria after the weekend).
However, I've a feeling that your common or garden sic is part
of the phrase "sic dicet" - so it was said - or at least something
like that. Long time since I studied Latin.
Mike Day
|
971.37 | | KYOA::MIANO | Mad Mike's Mythical Miracle | Tue Jan 16 1990 13:09 | 10 |
| RE: <<< Note 971.35 by SSDEVO::EGGERS "Anybody can fly with an engine." >>>
> John Wilkes Boothe shouted, "Sic semper tyrannus," as he
> shot Abraham Lincoln. I had no idea (until .34) that the
> phrase meant something like, "Tyrants always spell correctly."
I think what JWB was trying to say was "Thus, shall it always
be to tryrants". Sic means "thus".
John
|
971.38 | Rathole continued ... | VMSDEV::HALLYB | The Smart Money was on Goliath | Tue Jan 16 1990 15:01 | 14 |
| re: .37
>> John Wilkes Boothe shouted, "Sic semper tyrannus," as he
>> shot Abraham Lincoln. I had no idea (until .34) that the
>> phrase meant something like, "Tyrants always spell correctly."
>
>I think what JWB was trying to say was "Thus, shall it always
>be to tryrants". Sic means "thus".
Actually, he shouted "Sick temper Uranus", referring to the fact that he
was temporarily made ill in the head by an unusual planetary alignment.
However in the heat of the moment the Secretary transcribed the words
incorrectly, and disavowed any knowledge of Booth's actions.
John
|
971.39 | ...and more... | SCAM::GRADY | tim grady | Tue Jan 16 1990 15:33 | 4 |
| But wouldn't that have been "Sick temper urinal?"
tim
|
971.40 | How about SWAG? | WORDY::JONG | Steve Jong/NaC Pubs | Tue Jan 16 1990 16:02 | 1 |
|
|
971.41 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Jan 16 1990 16:37 | 1 |
| SWAG: Silly Wild-Assed Guess.
|
971.42 | | POKIE::SCHOENFELD | I may be used but I ain't used up | Tue Jan 16 1990 18:53 | 2 |
| or Scientific Wild-Assed Guess
|
971.43 | Wrong Rathole | JUMBLY::DAY | No Good Deed Goes Unpunished | Wed Jan 17 1990 07:49 | 5 |
| Re last couple. Is this the right conference for system
sizing/estimating ?
Mike Day
|
971.44 | Explode an acronym before breakfast | GYPSC::BINGER | Explode an acronym | Fri Feb 02 1990 12:10 | 14 |
| They have made an acronym from our share prices...
Thinking of how the stock prices were doing I read a mail from
a colleague and found 1 in 20 of the words(strings?) were acronyms.
Are we still talking the same language as our customers?
(regardless of geographic location).
Do people outside the company still understand us?
I would love to see an explode an acronym week (perhaps year)
inside DEC.
Rgds
|
971.45 | DEC-*BOOM* | PSYCHE::DMCLURE | Your favorite Martian | Mon Feb 05 1990 11:32 | 21 |
| re: .44,
> I would love to see an explode an acronym week (perhaps year)
> inside DEC.
Well, we could start by exploding the acronym "DEC". For years,
this term has been promoted by certain marketers as being somehow
superior to the trademarked name of "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|". According to
the book _The_Ultimate_Entrepeneur_ by Glenn Rifkin and George Harrar,
Ken Olsen has always fought to retain the original trademark over the
somewhat carelessly used acronym of "DEC".
-davo
p.s. Interesting historical tidbit: If Ken Olsen and Harlan Anderson
(original founders of the company) had their way to begin with and
had convinced General Doriot to allow them to jump right into the
computer business (as opposed to merely beginning by making components),
then our name would have been DCC (Digital Computer Corporation).
Either way, it would still have been referred to as "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|"
(perhaps this is why Ken Olsen is more fond of this trademark?).
|
971.46 | Digital vs DEC as company name | CTD050::HOUGH | Bob Hough, CLOSUS::HOUGH | Mon Feb 05 1990 12:10 | 22 |
|
> Well, we could start by exploding the acronym "DEC". For years,
> this term has been promoted by certain marketers as being somehow
> superior to the trademarked name of "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|".
Actually, this is a seriuos matter. The name of our company is
Digital Equipment Corporation or Digital for short. The term DEC
is never to be used as the name of our company. Legally, we have
a Trade Marked digital logo and we have 3 brand names: PDP, VAX,
and DEC. The term DEC can be used only as a brand name, such as
DECstation, never as the company name. Misuse of these terms and
logo has cost us loss of individual law suits in the past, has
cost us of the loss of right to register the trade mark for the
next 25 years in Australia, and could cost us loss of our trade
mark altogether.
For more information, see the Company Identity Manual, the
IAMOK::COMPANY_IDENTITY Notes file, or contact Peter Phillips,
Company Identity Manager.
bh
|
971.47 | | LAIDBK::FRIEDMAN_MI | Don't be happy; worry. | Mon Feb 05 1990 13:00 | 5 |
| In speaking, if you say something like, "We just bought
a Digital computer," the person might think you are saying
"digital computer," with a small "d." The problem with using
"Digital" is that it's a generic sort of word. If you say
"We just bought a DEC computer," then there is no ambiguity.
|
971.48 | I just use "Digital Equipment" | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue Feb 06 1990 08:48 | 23 |
| > < Note 971.46 by CTD050::HOUGH "Bob Hough, CLOSUS::HOUGH" >
> Actually, this is a seriuos matter. The name of our company is
> Digital Equipment Corporation or Digital for short.
Actually, it IS a serious matter, because our name varies depending
on the country in which we do business. If the listings in the back
of the phone book are to believed, here are some of our corporate names:
Digital Equipment N.V./S.A. (Belgium)
Digital Equipment France
Digital Equipment GmbH (FR Germany)
Digital Equipment S.p.A. (Italy)
Digital Equipment Hellas Epe (Greece)
Digital Equipment Ireland Ltd.
Digital Equipment International B.V. (Ireland)
Digital Equipment AB (Sweden)
Digital Equipment Corporation AG (Switzerland)
Digital Equipment Computer A.S. (Turkey)
Digital Equipment Co. Ltd. (UK)
Few of these abbreviate to "DEC."
|
971.49 | davo-*BOOM* | ESCROW::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Tue Feb 06 1990 14:39 | 15 |
|
Re .45:
I suspect that those nefarious "marketeers" are actually old-timers
who properly revere one of the few remaining symbols of their roots.
As a fellow old-timer, I shout:
-- "LEAVE 'DEC' ALONE!" --
This company will always be 'DEC' in my heart, and I will die a 'DECie'.
Please redirect your justified acronym animosity against more
deserving targets -- for example, 'I18N' (internationalization) and
I14Y (interoperability), which are incredibly 'S4D' (s____d).
|
971.50 | Besides, shorter names are better... | DECWIN::KLEIN | | Tue Feb 06 1990 16:06 | 23 |
| >> I suspect that those nefarious "marketeers" are actually old-timers
>> who properly revere one of the few remaining symbols of their roots.
>> As a fellow old-timer, I shout:
>>
>> -- "LEAVE 'DEC' ALONE!" --
>>
>> This company will always be 'DEC' in my heart, and I will die a 'DECie'.
Hear Hear. (Actually, I thought that DECie had two "c"s, but now that
you mention it, that doesn't look right either...)
I remember the (sad) day in 1976 or '77 that the big "DEC" sign outside
ML5-5 Thompson Street came down and was replaced with "DIGITAL".
I remember hearing something about "Ken decided to change the name",
and I thought that the original stated reason was because "DEC" wasn't
an English word but "DIGITAL" was. There might even have been a memo
sent around at the time explaining it.
For those of you who think it really helped us to have changed
our name, just remember: "IBM" doesn't seem to have had a whole lot
of trouble with their three-letter-acronym, have they...
-steve-
|
971.51 | A new language is born,, (unfortunately) | GYPSC::BINGER | Explode an acronym | Wed Feb 07 1990 11:23 | 15 |
| >re: .45,
>
>>> I would love to see an explode an acronym week (perhaps year)
>>> inside DEC.
>
Actually it wasnt the acronyn DEC that I intended. I was talking
about the proliferation of designer acronyms. These acronyms are dependent
on the project rather than the real world. eg. RAM what does that explode
to? (I dont mean random access memory) HLSA... etc these acronyms impede
rather than speed up communications.
If everyone started playing the acronym game we could have others like Kfz,
Pkw and a whole host of meaningless strings (to 95%). We will find
ourselves writing memos which not only IBM does not understand but the next
office in the sme corridor.
rgds,
|
971.52 | DEE-E-SEA is OK | MORO::NEWELL_JO | Jodi Newell - Irvine, Calif. | Wed Feb 07 1990 17:33 | 17 |
|
>>For those of you who think it really helped us to have changed
>>our name, just remember: "IBM" doesn't seem to have had a whole lot
>>of trouble with their three-letter-acronym, have they...
IBM doesn't have a problem because it is actually pronounced
EYE-BEE-EM. The problem occurs when the TLA (three letter acronym)
is spoken like a word, such as DEC (sounds like "deck").
At least this is how it was explained to me by Peter Phillips,
Corporate Identity Manager.
Jodi-
|
971.53 | | BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Fri Feb 09 1990 10:21 | 8 |
|
'DEC' (as a word) is Ok, since many of the people who use it are indeed such...
("DEC" = "[spoiled] child" )
I leave the readership to determine which language is in use...
/. Ian .\
|
971.54 | When is an acronym not an acronym? | SX4GTO::BERNARD | Dave from Cleveland | Fri Feb 09 1990 10:24 | 12 |
|
RE: -.1
In other words, IBM is not an acronym, it's just a set of initials,
pronounced as individual letters; hence, it's only an abbreviation.
D-E-C pronounced as letters is also not an acronym, but an abbreviation.
However, when D-E-C is pronounced as "deck," it becomes an acronym.
So what I seem to be hearing is that it's ok to use our company initials
as an abbreviation, but not as an acronym.
Dave
|
971.55 | D_E_C the Halls just doesn't sound right... | MORO::NEWELL_JO | Jodi Newell - Irvine, Calif. | Sat Feb 10 1990 23:26 | 16 |
| RE: .54
>So what I seem to be hearing is that it's ok to use our company initials
>as an abbreviation, but not as an acronym.
That was my understanding, but it's probably too late for that
approach.
According to the Company Identity Manual, the only time DEC,
the acronym, should be used is when talking about a product
such as DECwrite, DECtalk, etc.
Jodi-
|
971.56 | acronyms used within DIGITAL | MSBIS1::KING | Mid-Range Systems Business Group @BXB | Mon Apr 02 1990 12:22 | 15 |
| DIGITAL is a place where acronyms crop up like mushrooms. However when
an acronmym is created, it does not get out to the rest of the world
for some time, especially if you don't have regular periodic dealings
with the group that has adopted a new name. For example NAC is now
TAN. What does TAN stand for?? I've been afraid to ask in meetings
because I'd feel like an uninformed person. (ie an idiot).
Is there a place where acronyms used within DIGITAL are regularly
recorded and distributed? Something like the DIGITAL DICTIONARY.
It gets to be a bit frustrating when you hear of a new group and you
don't know what it stands for.
Bryan
|
971.57 | Telecommunications and Networks | GRANPA::DFAUST | New Sears=Old K-Mart | Mon Apr 02 1990 15:16 | 1 |
|
|
971.58 | They must have a new manager | XCUSME::KOSKI | This NOTE's for you | Thu Apr 05 1990 14:59 | 6 |
| Bryan you forgot the O, it's Telecommunication and Network
Organization. A big deal difference from Networks and Communications.
What a waste of time, do they really think these name changes are
changing the organization?
Gail
|