[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

971.0. "acronym translator" by CIMNET::TOBIN (still excited about the wheel) Fri Nov 17 1989 15:47

    I see a real need in DEC for an acronym translation utility.  In 13
    years with the company I've become a walking lexicon, but still often
    go to meetings where I don't have a clue what the speaker is getting
    at because they are leaning hard on an unfamiliar acronym.  To compound
    the problem, different meanings for the same acronym arise in different
    organizations.  How can we get a utility that would look up the acronym
    and give a list of organization-sensitive meanings?  This is one
    utility that would pay for itself in a week.
    		Tom
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
971.1On-line DEC dictionaryCVG::THOMPSONMy friends call me AlfredFri Nov 17 1989 16:225
	Doesn't the DIGITAL Dictionary hold acronyms? Perhaps an on-line
	copy of that would do? A BOOKREADER version with a good index
	would do the job to workstation users.

			Alfred
971.2a real needSX4GTO::BERNARDDave from ClevelandFri Nov 17 1989 17:015
    
    Good idea, and why not take it even a step farther- instead of only
    limiting it to acronyms, list abreviations, too.
    
    	Dave
971.3FWIWSTAR::BECKPaul BeckFri Nov 17 1989 17:503
    RE .0

    You mean an ATU which takes a TLA and returns OSMs?
971.4Fight for clarity...stamp out acronymsTIPPLE::MIANOI'm outta that place!!!!Fri Nov 17 1989 22:4312
RE: .0

When a speaker relies heavily on acronyms why not ask what they mean?
You know the old saying about a fool being the one who doesn't ask
questions. It has been my experience that people who use acronymns
heavily are usually B.S.ers.  Why not ask the emperor about his clothes? 

During my 4th class year at West Point we were not allowed to use
acronyms at all.  Why not make a valiant attempt to stamp them out
in DEC, I mean Digital Equipment Corporation.

John
971.5STAR::ROBERTSat Nov 18 1989 09:421
Use ELF V2?
971.6TROA01::MSCHNEIDERWhat .... me worry?Sat Nov 18 1989 21:018
    Seems alot of people have forgotten some basic facts of communication.
    It's ok to use acronyms, but it is proper and polite that the full
    wording is given (e.g. Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC)) before any
    subsequent usage of the acronym.
    
    We get so caught up with our acronyms that we constantly use them in
    front of our customers without even realizing it.  It's bad manners
    plain and simple! 
971.7The obvious answer!LENO::GRIERmjg's holistic computing agencySun Nov 19 1989 16:537
    Re: .5:
     
       You beat me to it...
    
    
    					-mjg
    
971.8A Virtual Memory System solutionVMSDEV::HALLYBThe Smart Money was on GoliathMon Nov 20 1989 12:4512
    Perhaps NaC� can develop a network-wide Acronym Server, then DCL�
    could implement an F$ACRONYM lexical that could then provide the
    translation upon request.  That would solve the problem for most
    users, except those who are tied to ALL-IN-1, which would require
    a separate non-DCL� solution from BOSE�.
    
      John
    
    ----------------
    �Networks and Communications
    �Digital Command Language
    �The people who develop ALL-IN-1
971.9F$DECRONYM("DCL","Most_Common_Meaning_please")LESLIE::LESLIEAndy ��� LeslieMon Nov 20 1989 16:221
    Thats DECRONYM, of course....
971.10...as found in the DECtionarySNOC02::SIMPSONThose whom the Gods would destroy...Tue Nov 21 1989 01:151
    
971.11small numbersMUSKIE::BLACKI always run out of time and space to finish ..Tue Nov 21 1989 13:228
    
    For ALL-IN-1 users, the dictionaries could be made to work for both
    incoming and outgoing messages and some definitions added ...
    
    But who cares about that, I wnat to know where the little bitty
    1,2 and 3 came from in .8
    
    
971.12ESCROW::KILGOREWild BillTue Nov 21 1989 13:297
    Re .11:
    
    Try 
    
    	[compose-character]^3
    
    
971.13hokay...senior, now what?NWD002::EVANS_BRTue Nov 21 1989 16:359
    
    Sorry to digress, but I tried Compose+Ctrl-3+1 (or +2, +3) and got
    "Key NONAME currently has no definition". Also tried 
    Compose+Shift-3 <gives # sign>, and Compose+Shift-6+3 <also bogus...>
    
    So give... what's the real secret???   Oh yeah - this done on a
    DECwindows VT3xx emulator VS2000
    
    I think the numbers are cute too!!  Effective!
971.14THRUST::THISSELLGeorge ThissellTue Nov 21 1989 17:089
    try 1)compose
        2)  ^ (that's a capital 6)
        3) 3
    
    like �
    
    George
    
    
971.15���������������������������������������������ZPOSWS::HWCHOYDU:IT here I come!Tue Nov 21 1989 17:2212
    re .14
    
    � (that's a capital 6)
    
    becareful, not all keyboards are the same. eg the european keyboards
    have a different layout.
    
    � �'�'�
    
    I believe the compose doesn't work on DECwindows terminal emulators.
    
    HW
971.16This too confused me at first...QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centTue Nov 21 1989 18:466
On DECwindows, the key you see as "Compose" is now "Alt".  To get the
compose key function, hold down the Alt (Compose) key and press the space
bar.  Let them both go.  The Compose light will be on.  Now type the
characters that make up your compose sequence.

				Steve
971.17DOS EM CEE PEE EM CEE or PEE?CGOA01::DTHOMPSONDon, of Don&#039;s ACTTue Nov 21 1989 21:0613
    That is, of course, unless you're editing your note with DECwrite
    which, as many applications do, uses the Alt key as an Alt key and
    not as a Compose key.  Add to that the confusion between ^1 and
    Ctrl-1, not to mention that Alt itself has been called other things
    in the past like 'super shift' and soon we will discover why noone
    has yet jumped up to provide the Acronym Translator.
    
    Now let me see, is that 'VEE EM ESS' or 'VEE EMs'?  And why is Rdb
    an RDBMS but DBMS is not?  Shouldn't 80% the same beat 60%?  Is
    OH ESS TWO like OH ESS or is it a different O.S.?  Come to think
    of it, is MS-DOS like DOS-VS or DOS it really matter? 
                                    
    Sorry, couldn't help myself on the last one.
971.18Oh never mindHWSSS0::SZETOSimon Szeto @HGO, HongkongWed Nov 22 1989 06:217
    I was going to issue a rat-hole alert but when I back-noted to .8 where
    the rat hole started, I noticed a common error in footnote usage.  The
    error is ... (oops, I guess I really shouldn't get into that and start
    another rat hole).
    
    --Simon
    
971.19The UK has invented the wheelCHEFS::CONWAYWed Nov 22 1989 08:495
    An extensive list of Acronyms and their translations already exists
    on UK National VTX. It is maintained by Geoff Rippington @UCG dtn
    781-4170  who, having spoken to him, I know would be pleased, either 
    to receive further contributions or to make it more widely available.
                                           
971.20Waiter, some bait pleaseVMSDEV::HALLYBThe Smart Money was on GoliathWed Nov 22 1989 11:1710
.18>  I noticed a common error in footnote usage.  The
.18>  error is ... (oops, I guess I really shouldn't get into that 
    
    Oh, come on, Simon� -- DO tell us!
    
      John
    
    ------------------
    �Simon, curiously enough, is old Taigorain for "He who notices well"
     (maybe it was an acronym :-)
971.21STAR::BECKPaul BeckWed Nov 22 1989 14:143
I'd guess he's referring to the� practice of footnoting the� same word twice.

�It's still the same word, no matter how often you make reference to it.
971.22YANC perhaps? (yet another notes conference)SCAACT::RESENDEWe never criticize the competition directly.Sat Nov 25 1989 18:277
Why not set up (yet another, sigh) Notes conference called "DEC_ACRONYMS" and
create a topic for every one of them ..... with as many replies as necessary to
provide all the definitions?

We all needed another to track :-)

Steve
971.23not notes "VTX ELF"!!!!!SCCAT::HARVEYMon Nov 27 1989 14:184
    We would most likely get a ELF V2 compatable interface instead of
    a DEC_ACRONYMS conference....
    
    :-) Renis
971.24What are IMHO and FWIW?KISHOR::HEIMANNDavid Heimann,DTN240-6409,AET1-2/7Mon Jan 08 1990 13:2914
Speaking of acronyms, I see several informal ones in NOTES files from time 
to time.  Some of them I've heard before; BTW --  By the way, CU -- See 
you, or FYI -- For Your Information.  What, however, do the following two 
mean?

	IMHO
	FWIW

Are there any other such acronyms to know about?

							Thanks,

							David

971.25re: .24DELREY::PEDERSON_PAyeah...but it&#039;s a DRY heat!Mon Jan 08 1990 13:374
    IMHO = In My Humble Opinion
    
    FWIW = For What It's Worth
    
971.26or...MEMV03::HADDADMon Jan 08 1990 16:033
IMHO = In My Head Only

Bruce
971.27IMHO alternativesSSDEVO::EGGERSAnybody can fly with an engine.Wed Jan 10 1990 18:325
    IMHO = In My Hubristic Opinion,
    
    which is exactly the opposite of
    
    IMHO = In My Humble Opinion
971.28Here's another oneKISHOR::HEIMANNBlack holes--God divides by zero!Thu Jan 11 1990 11:467
    Here's another "notes" acronym I just saw -- BWTF.  What does this
    mean?
    
    							FWIW,
    
    							David
    
971.29I could tell you...WORDY::JONGSteve Jong/NaC PubsThu Jan 11 1990 12:143
    ... but what the f*** would you want to know for?
    
    Sorry, I think that's what it means.
971.30WRASSE::FRIEDRICHSGo Bruins!!Thu Jan 11 1990 13:392
    how about "sic", usually used in parens "(sic)"??
    
971.31WMOIS::FULTIThu Jan 11 1990 13:4412
>    how about "sic", usually used in parens "(sic)"??
    
This is not an acronym but, an actual word....
From the dict.

SIC adv. Thus; so. Used in written texts to indicate that a surprising quotation
is not a mistake and is to be read as it stands.

- George

Sometimes I believe people use it (sic) to indicate that the spelling may be
incorrect and to pronounce the word/name phonically.
971.32Siccing "sic" on the unwaryWORDY::JONGSteve Jong/NaC PubsThu Jan 11 1990 14:2910
    I rathole:
    
    "sic" is Latin, and means, in effect, "this is not my error."  Often used
    editorially in newspapers, for example:
    
    	The statement continued, "We then proceed (sic) to the corner."
    
    By the way, "sic" can be used as a subtle editorial weapon to ridicule
    others.  I've seen it used on critical letters to the editor,
    nitpicking the letter-writer's submission to death with "(sic)"s.
971.33"thus"REGENT::POWERSFri Jan 12 1990 08:337
>    "sic" is Latin, and means, in effect, "this is not my error."  

Literally, 'sic' means 'thus', and is used to indicate that the error
(or whatever) in quoted text was expressed as shown ("thusly")...

discussed in more length in JOKUR::GRAMMAR and probably ASKENET archives
and JOYOFLEX.....
971.34And further down the hole we go...DNEAST::SIMON_ANDYHe who dies with most toys winsMon Jan 15 1990 17:572
    FWIW, IMHO "(SIC)" is an Abbr. for " Spelling Is Correct ". It just
    happens to have a similar latin meaning.
971.35SSDEVO::EGGERSAnybody can fly with an engine.Mon Jan 15 1990 19:415
    Hmmm.  Note .34 is very interesting.
    
    John Wilkes Boothe shouted, "Sic semper tyrannus," as he
    shot Abraham Lincoln. I had no idea (until .34) that the
    phrase meant something like, "Tyrants always spell correctly."
971.36Rathole continued ..JUMBLY::DAYNo Good Deed Goes UnpunishedTue Jan 16 1990 04:4210
    There are quite a few sics about, lurking in the nether regions
    of the English language. Sic transit gloria mundi for example.
    (I ran into Gloria after the weekend).
    
    However, I've a feeling that your common or garden sic is part
    of the phrase "sic dicet" - so it was said - or at least something
    like that. Long time since I studied Latin.
    
    Mike Day
    
971.37KYOA::MIANOMad Mike&#039;s Mythical MiracleTue Jan 16 1990 13:0910
RE:      <<< Note 971.35 by SSDEVO::EGGERS "Anybody can fly with an engine." >>>

>    John Wilkes Boothe shouted, "Sic semper tyrannus," as he
>    shot Abraham Lincoln. I had no idea (until .34) that the
>    phrase meant something like, "Tyrants always spell correctly."

I think what JWB was trying to say was "Thus, shall it always
be to tryrants". Sic means "thus".  

John
971.38Rathole continued ...VMSDEV::HALLYBThe Smart Money was on GoliathTue Jan 16 1990 15:0114
    re: .37
>>    John Wilkes Boothe shouted, "Sic semper tyrannus," as he
>>    shot Abraham Lincoln. I had no idea (until .34) that the
>>    phrase meant something like, "Tyrants always spell correctly."
>
>I think what JWB was trying to say was "Thus, shall it always
>be to tryrants". Sic means "thus".  
    
    Actually, he shouted "Sick temper Uranus", referring to the fact that he
    was temporarily made ill in the head by an unusual planetary alignment.
    However in the heat of the moment the Secretary transcribed the words
    incorrectly, and disavowed any knowledge of Booth's actions.
    
      John
971.39...and more...SCAM::GRADYtim gradyTue Jan 16 1990 15:334
    But wouldn't that have been "Sick temper urinal?"
    
    tim
    
971.40How about SWAG?WORDY::JONGSteve Jong/NaC PubsTue Jan 16 1990 16:021
    
971.41COVERT::COVERTJohn R. CovertTue Jan 16 1990 16:371
SWAG: Silly Wild-Assed Guess.
971.42POKIE::SCHOENFELDI may be used but I ain&#039;t used upTue Jan 16 1990 18:532
    or Scientific Wild-Assed Guess
    
971.43Wrong RatholeJUMBLY::DAYNo Good Deed Goes UnpunishedWed Jan 17 1990 07:495
    Re last couple. Is this the right conference for system
    sizing/estimating ?
    
    Mike Day
    
971.44Explode an acronym before breakfastGYPSC::BINGERExplode an acronymFri Feb 02 1990 12:1014
	They have made an acronym from our share prices... 

	Thinking of how the stock prices were doing I read a mail from 
	a colleague and found 1 in 20 of the words(strings?) were acronyms. 


	Are we still talking the same language as our customers? 
	(regardless of geographic location). 
	Do people outside the company still understand us?

	I would love to see an explode an acronym week (perhaps year) 
	inside DEC.

		Rgds
971.45DEC-*BOOM*PSYCHE::DMCLUREYour favorite MartianMon Feb 05 1990 11:3221
re: .44,

>	I would love to see an explode an acronym week (perhaps year) 
>	inside DEC.

	Well, we could start by exploding the acronym "DEC".  For years,
    this term has been promoted by certain marketers as being somehow
    superior to the trademarked name of "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|".  According to
    the book _The_Ultimate_Entrepeneur_ by Glenn Rifkin and George Harrar,
    Ken Olsen has always fought to retain the original trademark over the
    somewhat carelessly used acronym of "DEC".

				    -davo

p.s.	Interesting historical tidbit: If Ken Olsen and Harlan Anderson
	(original founders of the company) had their way to begin with and
	had convinced General Doriot to allow them to jump right into the
	computer business (as opposed to merely beginning by making components),
	then our name would have been DCC (Digital Computer Corporation).
	Either way, it would still have been referred to as "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|"
	(perhaps this is why Ken Olsen is more fond of this trademark?).
971.46Digital vs DEC as company nameCTD050::HOUGHBob Hough, CLOSUS::HOUGHMon Feb 05 1990 12:1022
> Well, we could start by exploding the acronym "DEC".  For years,
> this term has been promoted by certain marketers as being somehow
> superior to the trademarked name of "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|".  

Actually, this is a seriuos matter. The name of our company is
Digital Equipment Corporation or Digital for short. The term DEC
is never to be used as the name of our company. Legally, we have
a Trade Marked digital logo and we have 3 brand names: PDP, VAX,
and DEC. The term DEC can be used only as a brand name, such as
DECstation, never as the company name. Misuse of these terms and
logo has cost us loss of individual law suits in the past, has
cost us of the loss of right to register the trade mark for the
next 25 years in Australia, and could cost us loss of our trade
mark altogether.

For more information, see the Company Identity Manual, the
IAMOK::COMPANY_IDENTITY Notes file, or contact Peter Phillips,
Company Identity Manager.

bh

971.47LAIDBK::FRIEDMAN_MIDon&#039;t be happy; worry.Mon Feb 05 1990 13:005
    In speaking, if you say something like, "We just bought
    a Digital computer," the person might think you are saying
    "digital computer," with a small "d."  The problem with using
    "Digital" is that it's a generic sort of word.  If you say
    "We just bought a DEC computer," then there is no ambiguity.
971.48I just use "Digital Equipment"REGENT::POWERSTue Feb 06 1990 08:4823
> < Note 971.46 by CTD050::HOUGH "Bob Hough, CLOSUS::HOUGH" >

> Actually, this is a seriuos matter. The name of our company is
> Digital Equipment Corporation or Digital for short. 


Actually, it IS a serious matter, because our name varies depending
on the country in which we do business.  If the listings in the back
of the phone book are to believed, here are some of our corporate names:

  Digital Equipment N.V./S.A. (Belgium)
  Digital Equipment France
  Digital Equipment GmbH (FR Germany)
  Digital Equipment S.p.A. (Italy)
  Digital Equipment Hellas Epe (Greece)
  Digital Equipment Ireland Ltd.
  Digital Equipment International B.V. (Ireland)
  Digital Equipment AB (Sweden)
  Digital Equipment Corporation AG (Switzerland)
  Digital Equipment Computer A.S. (Turkey)
  Digital Equipment Co. Ltd. (UK)

Few of these abbreviate to "DEC."
971.49davo-*BOOM*ESCROW::KILGOREWild BillTue Feb 06 1990 14:3915
    
    Re .45:
    
    I suspect that those nefarious "marketeers" are actually old-timers
    who properly revere one of the few remaining symbols of their roots.
    As a fellow old-timer, I shout:
    
    		      --  "LEAVE 'DEC' ALONE!" --
    
    This company will always be 'DEC' in my heart, and I will die a 'DECie'.
    
    Please redirect your justified acronym animosity against more
    deserving targets -- for example, 'I18N' (internationalization) and
    I14Y (interoperability), which are incredibly 'S4D' (s____d).
    
971.50Besides, shorter names are better...DECWIN::KLEINTue Feb 06 1990 16:0623
>>    I suspect that those nefarious "marketeers" are actually old-timers
>>    who properly revere one of the few remaining symbols of their roots.
>>    As a fellow old-timer, I shout:
>>    
>>    		      --  "LEAVE 'DEC' ALONE!" --
>>    
>>    This company will always be 'DEC' in my heart, and I will die a 'DECie'.

Hear Hear.  (Actually, I thought that DECie had two "c"s, but now that
you mention it, that doesn't look right either...)

I remember the (sad) day in 1976 or '77 that the big "DEC" sign outside
ML5-5 Thompson Street came down and was replaced with "DIGITAL".
I remember hearing something about "Ken decided to change the name",
and I thought that the original stated reason was because "DEC" wasn't
an English word but "DIGITAL" was.  There might even have been a memo
sent around at the time explaining it.

For those of you who think it really helped us to have changed
our name, just remember: "IBM" doesn't seem to have had a whole lot
of trouble with their three-letter-acronym, have they...

-steve-
971.51A new language is born,, (unfortunately)GYPSC::BINGERExplode an acronymWed Feb 07 1990 11:2315
>re: .45,
>
>>>       I would love to see an explode an acronym week (perhaps year) 
>>>       inside DEC.
>
	Actually it wasnt the acronyn DEC that I intended. I was talking 
about the proliferation of designer acronyms. These acronyms are dependent 
on the project rather than the real world. eg. RAM what does that explode 
to? (I dont mean random access memory) HLSA... etc these acronyms impede
rather than speed up communications. 
If everyone started playing the acronym game we could have others like Kfz, 
Pkw and a whole host of meaningless strings (to 95%). We will find 
ourselves writing memos which not only IBM does not understand but the next 
office in the sme corridor.
		rgds,
971.52DEE-E-SEA is OKMORO::NEWELL_JOJodi Newell - Irvine, Calif.Wed Feb 07 1990 17:3317
    

>>For those of you who think it really helped us to have changed
>>our name, just remember: "IBM" doesn't seem to have had a whole lot
>>of trouble with their three-letter-acronym, have they...

    IBM doesn't have a problem because it is actually pronounced
    EYE-BEE-EM.  The problem occurs when the TLA (three letter acronym)
    is spoken like a word, such as DEC (sounds like "deck"). 
    
    At least this is how it was explained to me by Peter Phillips,
    Corporate Identity Manager.
    
    Jodi-
    
    
    
971.53BRABAM::PHILPOTTCol I F &#039;Tsingtao Dhum&#039; PhilpottFri Feb 09 1990 10:218
'DEC' (as a word) is Ok, since many of the people who use it are indeed such...

("DEC" = "[spoiled] child" )

I leave the readership to determine which language is in use...

/. Ian .\
971.54When is an acronym not an acronym?SX4GTO::BERNARDDave from ClevelandFri Feb 09 1990 10:2412
    
    
    	RE: -.1
    
    In other words, IBM is not an acronym, it's just a set of initials, 
    pronounced as individual letters; hence, it's only an abbreviation.
    D-E-C pronounced as letters is also not an acronym, but an abbreviation.
    However, when D-E-C is pronounced as "deck," it becomes an acronym.
    
    So what I seem to be hearing is that it's ok to use our company initials
    as an abbreviation, but not as an acronym.
    	Dave
971.55D_E_C the Halls just doesn't sound right...MORO::NEWELL_JOJodi Newell - Irvine, Calif.Sat Feb 10 1990 23:2616
    RE: .54
    
>So what I seem to be hearing is that it's ok to use our company initials
>as an abbreviation, but not as an acronym.
 
    
    That was my understanding, but it's probably too late for that
    approach. 
    
    According to the Company Identity Manual, the only time DEC,
    the acronym, should be used is when talking about a product 
    such as DECwrite, DECtalk, etc.
    
    Jodi-
    
    
971.56acronyms used within DIGITALMSBIS1::KINGMid-Range Systems Business Group @BXBMon Apr 02 1990 12:2215
    DIGITAL is a place where acronyms crop up like mushrooms.  However when
    an acronmym is created, it does not get out to the rest of the world
    for some time, especially if you don't have regular periodic dealings
    with the group that has adopted a new name.  For example NAC is now
    TAN. What does TAN stand for??  I've been afraid to ask in meetings
    because I'd feel like an uninformed person. (ie an idiot).  
    
    Is there a place where acronyms used within DIGITAL are regularly
    recorded and distributed?  Something like the DIGITAL DICTIONARY.
    
    It gets to be a bit frustrating when you hear of a new group and you
    don't know what it stands for.
    
    
    Bryan
971.57Telecommunications and NetworksGRANPA::DFAUSTNew Sears=Old K-MartMon Apr 02 1990 15:161
    
971.58They must have a new managerXCUSME::KOSKIThis NOTE&#039;s for youThu Apr 05 1990 14:596
    Bryan you forgot the O, it's Telecommunication and Network
    Organization. A big deal difference from Networks and Communications.
    What a waste of time, do they really think these name changes are
    changing the organization?  
    
    Gail