T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
922.1 | TRY THE APPEAL PROCESS | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Sat Sep 16 1989 14:07 | 7 |
| Not sure where you live(housing market) however I relocated from
the Phila. area to Washington market two years ago, and found Home
equity to be right on the money, their apprasial was only 4k off
the mark from what i sold it for, try the appeal process I have
heard that this can work, also try a different appraiser than
the ones they supplied, it could be your market is depressed.
|
922.2 | Greater Maynard Housing Market is Depressed | NSSG::KUSNETZKY | Sales Support VAX Program Manager | Sat Sep 16 1989 18:05 | 10 |
| Stan,
It is beginning to appear as if the area around greater Maynard has a
depressed housing market. My home has been appraised (a four week
process so far) and while I've not been told what I'll be offered, I
have been told that all three of the appraisals are for less that I
paid for my home! I'm not sure what I'm going to do about the whole
situation.
Dan Kusnetzky
|
922.3 | See also 897.1 | MILKWY::MORRISON | Bob M. LMO2/P41 296-5357 | Sat Sep 16 1989 21:17 | 11 |
| See also 897.1. The group I work for is moving to another site 25 miles away
and several people have had a bad experience with the "DEC will buy your house"
phase of relo. I have heard that the third party pays less then the market
value for a house because they must make a profit on the sale of the house and
can't afford to have a large inventory of unsold houses on the market.
I'm not a homeowner, but when the group relo plan was presented, I thought,
"Gee, DEC is generous. If you don't want to hold onto your house for months
while trying to sell it, DEC will buy it." The first thing I realized is that
DEC doesn't buy houses. Then I realized that if you were to offer your house
for public sale at what the third party would pay for it, you would probably
sell it almost as quickly as if the third party bought it.
|
922.4 | R.O.R. | NISSAN::STIMSON | Thomas | Sat Sep 16 1989 22:10 | 14 |
|
The appraisers on Home Equity's list will always lowball the price,
because if they come in high too mmany times, they get dropped
from the list. You are allowed to select an appraiser
not on the list if he meets certain requirements. Selecting an
appraiser on Home Equity's list is like selecting a doctor
who is paid by the bacteria.
Appeals are usually unsuccessful because Home Equity just sends
your appeal back to the appraiser, who will be very reluctant
to admit having made a mistake, and certainly will not change
anything which is judgemental in nature.
|
922.5 | | VMSSG::DICKINSON | Peter Dickinson | Sun Sep 17 1989 17:08 | 19 |
|
Home Equity is supposed to offer fair market value for your property.
If you can prove they are coming in under fair market value, you may
have a case, otherwise your SOL. If you live in an area where the
prices of condos are falling due to saturation, then your going to have
to bite the proverbial bullet and come up with the difference.
If there are no severe time constraints, you will be better off selling
yourself, after all, Home Equity has a lot more time to sell than you
do.
If you should have to borrow to pay off the condo, try to do it
privately because when it comes time to buy at your new location that
debt will work against you, and if there is no written record, that
debt will be invisible to the new lending institution.
This is all an education in being paranoid when dealing with real
estate brokers, only in rare cases are they out to help _you_.
|
922.6 | one case | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Sun Sep 17 1989 17:39 | 18 |
| I just sold my house in Littleton, Mass. using Merrill Lynch. The
three appraisals I got were 147K, 157K, and 169K, making Merrill
Lynch's offer be 157.67K. Merrill Lynch's own real-estate agent came
up with 171K.
My real-estate agent said she could get 179.9K. In fact, when the
first offer was for 175K, I took it. The low appraisals had me worried.
Also, the interest on that amount comes to about $1200/month, which
encourages a speedy sale.
I did get the buyer's offer up to 178K by offering him Merrill Lynch's
3K rebate. So I ended up with 179K, the 178K plus the 1K bounty for
finding a buyer.
I was not at all impressed with the appraisals, and I strongly suspect
that some of the earlier notes are correct concerning the appraisers
coming in with low numbers to ensure they keep getting the appraisal
business.
|
922.7 | A WASTE OF TIME | MSCSSE::LENNARD | | Mon Sep 18 1989 10:20 | 14 |
| I've relocated three times and have never been really thrilled with
third party offers, but considering the alternatives, I always accepted
them. The basic problem is that most folks have a badly inflated idea
of what their house is worth. The truth hurts.
I appealed twice and it is a useless exercise. It you don't like the
offer, try to sell it yourself. The corporation still picks up all the
fees, etc.
Don't fall in the trap of thinking that the third-party firm is
arbitrarily undercutting the offer just to insure their profitability.
They get about 20% of the appraised value right off the top as a
direct payment from Digital. A few years ago it was 19.8%, so I'm
assuming it's a little higher now.
|
922.8 | Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you! | POBOX::LEVIN | My kind of town, Chicago is | Mon Sep 18 1989 23:09 | 16 |
| Sure, here comes the paranoia .....
Figures are low so there must be a conspriracy to low-ball
any offer.
When I relocated from Framingham in '86, the appraisals came in
under what our original realtor suggested as a price for the house.
It was only a little low, so we took it so we didn't have to worry
about whether it sold or not.
Guess what! The house took several months to sell and when it did
it was lower than the HomeEquity price. So I can state that, in
at least one instance, employees can come out ahead even if the
first reaction is "That low! Must be a conspiracy!"
/Marvin
|
922.9 | And you KEEP the R/E COMMISSION!! | DPDMAI::DAVISGB | Gil Davis DTN 554-7245 | Tue Sep 19 1989 13:12 | 32 |
| Before we left New Hampshire we tried for 4 months to sell our cape in
New Ipswich for $145,000. We were offered $131,250 by homequity and
TOOK it! It took Digital 7 more months to sell the house. Personally
I think it's still a great deal. It's not DEC's fault (hmmm...this may
be arguable) that a particular housing market is flat. I watched VTX
and saw my house listed for EXACTLY what I was paid ($131,250) for the
seven months. I think after awhile, someone just approaches the local
real estate agent (Norwood in this case) and says 'Look, that house has
been on the market for 9 months...I'll give you $120,000." The
homequity (or Merrill Lynch) and DEC folks do some figuring and decide
that it's in everyone's best interest to just let it go rather than
having it sit empty and making payments...
Look at it this way. You have to move on to a new job. Digital
ENCOURAGES you to sell the home on your own. Then, if you can't sell
it, they arrive at a reasonable figure from two or three different
appraisers that *you* choose, and offer what they think they can sell
it for in 120 days. Then you CASH OUT! Remember, you get the full
value of the house...with NO LOSS in real estate commission! Talk
about a way to build equity! Now, I'm sure that some folks end up
getting less that what they paid for or what they think they're
entitled...so...try to sell it yourself! It's hard to convince anyone
that your house is worth more when you have had a for sale sign out for
four months (as we did) and no takers...
It's a good program.... (I've used it twice, with my own share of
glitches and bad feelings...) but consider the alternative.
If you want to worry about something...have your RADON checked!
Whew...I need to get some more coffee.....
|
922.10 | I heard that once... | DPDMAI::DAVISGB | Gil Davis DTN 554-7245 | Tue Sep 19 1989 13:15 | 6 |
| I guess the home purchase program is subject to the same problems as
computers....
after all, they're both run by humans!
(Aren't appraisers human....?)
|
922.11 | Another one | COOKIE::WILCOX | Database Systems/West | Tue Sep 19 1989 19:01 | 10 |
| I relocated from Colorado Springs to NH about 4.5 years ago and all
3 Home Equity appraisals came in at exactly 93K. We had paid 86,900
for our house 18 months previously. The house sat on the market for
a long time and was finally sold at LESS than we paid for it. I did
think the 93K was low considering the builder was now charging about
98K for that model. All things considered, though, I think we did
quite well. I couldn't come close to making that on the house
we now own in the Springs. :-(.
|
922.12 | | MSCSSE::LENNARD | | Wed Sep 20 1989 17:19 | 8 |
| One final comment, .o.......I just reread your note and noticed you
have a condo! Given what I've heard about the sad state of the condo
market in Mass these days, you're lucky you got any offer.
Be glad you aren't trying to get out of a house in the "oil patch"
where you might have to take half of what you paid ten years ago, if
you can get it!
|
922.13 | A condo?? | HOTAIR::DAVIS | Uh Oh...another Balloonist.. | Sun Sep 24 1989 22:27 | 8 |
| A condo! Yoweee...! I missed that one too!
When we were trying to sell our NH house, the real estate agent said
'yeah, there was potential offer on it, but I didn't even write it
up.....they guy was trying to sell a condo in Nashua and there are a
THOUSAND condos in Nashua right now and none of 'em are moving.'
|
922.14 | | ABACUS::RADWIN | I think, fer sure | Mon Sep 25 1989 14:04 | 7 |
| If you think the price is too low, try to find out what comparable
condos have been selling for recently in your area. A friendly
broker can help or you can try your town hall. The information on
comparables will either help with an appeal or show you that
the H-E offer is reasonable given the current market.
Gene
|
922.15 | loooooo ball.... | RAVEN1::DANDREA | I shot the Deputy... | Thu Oct 19 1989 15:45 | 14 |
| To add my 2 cents, when I left Colo Springs in March of this year, Home
Equity offered me (based on *my* appraisers) $7,000 LESS than my
mortgage balance! Not $7k less than what I paid, but $7k less than what
I owed on the original mortgage!!! I'll be d*mned if I was gonna try
and come up with $7k just to close out! I HAD to sell it myself, which
I quickly did on a simple assumption using the $3k buyer incentive
credit, and the $1k bonus to me for selling it myself. All my realtor
expenses were covered, so all in all it was a good move, BUT, the offer
was DISASTEROUS!!
Good luck!
Steve
|
922.16 | Yes it does | STAR::PARKE | You're a surgeon, not Jack the Ripper | Fri Oct 20 1989 17:21 | 22 |
| I was involved in an offer with HE and recivede a suprisingly low offer for
my property. When I asked for the appraisals was I suprised. They were:
$80,000 (This was a while ago)
$74,000
$32,000 (I had paid $55,000)
and Home Equity takes the average for the offer.
I challanged and eventually the low ball raised to $67,000 which made a Biiigggg
difference.
I understand in most cases it doesn't pay to challange, but if you can prove
they used one or more Turkey's to do their work (in my case the person
was in a hurry to do the appraisal to get to an appointment to show
another house) you can come out way ahead.
The most wonderful PS to this was the "turkey" was the one given the contract
to sell the house and he finally sold it for $66,000 with a $6,000 rebate
in one day on the market in Northern NH (I returned and met the new owners to
tell them about the orchard we put in and other stuff).
Bill
|
922.17 | Ask your Broker to help | DNEAST::STARIE_DICK | I'd rather be skiing | Tue Oct 24 1989 12:34 | 12 |
| The way to win is to do your homework. Appraisers have reputations just
like other businessmen and women. You can ask for the list of qualified
appriasers and select three from the list. Local brokers will know who
usually comes in high, who comes in low, and who to NEVER use.
As a Real Estate Broker I get inquirys all the time about my opinion
of appraisers. I have to be very careful to qualify my opinions as
my personal opinion, but I do answer. ( Some Brokers won't )
I am in Augusta, Maine so I won't be of much help to many of you, but
ask around, the Brokers in your area know who's crazy!
|
922.18 | HE should be the last resort | GUIDUK::B_WOOD | Once a hacker, now a hiker | Fri Oct 27 1989 14:29 | 13 |
| I heard many war stories about HE when I was in Colorado Springs.
Seems HE was specifically looking for the bad appraisers and
low balling everyone.
I am very wary of appraisers in general. I currently live in Seattle
which is one of the hotest RE markets in the country now. The RE agent
I purchased my house from quoted me a figure $20,000 (20%) higher to sell
my house than what the appraisers have given me to refinance.
I've looked at the houses locally that are selling and I'm convinced
the agent is estimating a low value.
If your going to move, only use HE if you have no other alternative.
|
922.19 | low-ball? you betcha! | RIPPLE::KOPEC_ST | NW Dist Sales DNT 206-637-4207 | Mon Nov 20 1989 20:36 | 43 |
| re .8
> Sure, here comes the paranoia .....
> Figures are low so there must be a conspiracy to low-ball
> any offer.
FACTS:
I recently relocated with HE and the 2 appraisals (from HE's list of
acceptable appraisers) came in 14.5% and 18.2% below the price that I
paid for it 2 years ago. *Three days* after receiving these offers, I
sold the condo through a local realtor for just a 5% loss.
COMMENTS: Now I certainly agree that the HE/ML companies are there to
expedite the process, there are loads of condos in inventory
right now, and in my case the 'system' worked in that the
ridiculously low offer forced me to find a buyer willing to
pay a higher price on my own, but *please* don't try to tell
me that these appraisers are giving true market value and
are not "low-balling" the offers! The only condos in that
development that were sold recently in the price range
that HE's appraisers were offering were those that were
bought out by either HE or ML. Any condos that were sold
*without* HE/ML's "assistance" brought in a similarly priced
market value as the final price we got through our realtor.
Stan
PS Furthermore, when it came time for our buyer's bank to send over an
appraiser, guess who they picked? One of the 2 original appraisers! We
protested that this was conflict of interest since he had done the appraisal
already for HE. The bank agreed with us and when our realtor called him to
explain the situation, he was (according to the realtor) blubbering all over
himself, volunteering to take himself out of the process. Apparently, he can
be severely reprimanded for abusing the system (getting paid twice from
different sources for the same job!). Let's hope so!!! Good enough for him...
He now has a marred, unethical image in at least one large Central Mass Realty
Co's eyes, and possibly more trouble than he bargained for! So, here is one
example of a "HE-chosen" appraiser who was neither ethical nor accurate/fair
in his business dealings with us.
BTW, the NEW appraiser that was chosen by the buyer's bank had no problem with
the higher selling price of the home.
|
922.20 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Tue Nov 21 1989 19:14 | 7 |
| So what's wrong with the appraiser managing to get paid twice for the
same appraisal job? It sounds perfectly reasonable to me. I am far
more concerned with the accuracy of the appraisal than the number of
times the appraiser gets paid for it.
(Please don't tell me it's "unethical". I want to know WHY it is
considered unethical.)
|
922.21 | | BOOKIE::MURRAY | Chuck Murray | Wed Nov 22 1989 09:31 | 17 |
| Re .20: It's wrong for the same reason that it would be wrong for a legal
appeal to be heard by the same judge who made the decision being appealed.
The judge would have a personal interest in maintaining the correctness
of his or her original decision.
That doesn't mean that the judge's original decision was wrong or unfair
(just as the appraiser's decision may or may not have been "accurate"). It
just means that a fair process requires an objective "second look," because
the legitimate interests of an outside party (the loser in the previous
lawsuit or the homeowner who needs an appraisal above a certain amount
for the sale to be approved) conflict with the understandable personal
interests of the original decision maker.
This principle would also mean that anyone with strong personal or
business ties to the original decision maker should not be rendering
the second decision. For instance, it would be wrong for the wife or
business partner of the original appraiser to make the second appraisal.
|
922.22 | It's all in who pays the bill! | DNEAST::STARIE_DICK | I'd rather be skiing | Wed Nov 22 1989 09:46 | 17 |
| It's all in who pays the appraiser. I am also a real estate broker. I
have had appraisers tell me that I will always like their work. The
banker who does the loan is paid on commision, just like I am. He hires
the apprasier. If the deal falls thru due to the appraisal the banker
loses his commision. Appraisers who come in low too often for the bank
find that they aren't working much. The Home Equity situation is the
reverse. it is home equity who is paying the bill. Stands to reason
that if the appraiser comes in high too often and Home Equity takes
losses, would also be unemployed.
You can help your self a bit by having a fee appraisal done before you
call Home equity. Provide a copy of the appraisal and it's comps to
each of Home equity's apprisers. They may not use them, but my
experience is that most of them are lazy, and that with the work done
and in hand they will use it...
dick
|
922.23 | | RIPPLE::KOPEC_ST | NW Dist Sales DNT 206-637-4207 | Mon Nov 27 1989 19:45 | 23 |
| Just got back from T-day and saw the activity.
Thanks to .21 and .22 for giving the reasons for disallowing
the "double-dipping" that certain appraisers might attempt to do.
Just a few followup comments:
1) Regarding doing a prelim appraisal before HE's appraisers come
over. We actually did do that but from the outcome, it did not
appear that they took that into account (and certainly HE did not
want to hear it!). Also the bank's appraiser looked at us kind of
funny and chuckled when we handed him a copy of the original prelim
appraisals from our realtor. I suppose it can't hurt to try though.
2) The moral of the whole story, I guess, is: If you ever get
low-balled by HE's appraisers and then succeed in finding a buyer
on your own, *ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS* ask *WHO* the buyer's bank is
choosing for an appraiser, just in case... If you want to be even
more proactive, I would strongly suggest picking AT LEAST one
(maybe both) appraisers from outside of the local area - since the
bank will generally choose the home-grown local appraisers.
Stan
|
922.24 | | RIPPLE::KOPEC_ST | Seattle Sales DNT 206-637-4207 | Tue Dec 19 1989 12:51 | 5 |
| BTW, if anyone wants to know who the Central Mass appraiser is who
I described in .19, feel free to call me so you can avoid the same
unnecessary grief that he put us through.
Stan
|
922.25 | Real Estate People are liars | GUIDUK::B_WOOD | Once a hacker, now a hiker | Mon Mar 19 1990 18:17 | 38 |
| Appraisal are only a best guess about the process of selling a home.
You never know what a house will sell for until you have a willing
buyer. In some markets, that's what you pray for! When I moved
to Colorado Springs with DEC in 1984, I started hearing war stories
about HE. Also, I heard that HE doesn't loose money on a bad deal,
DEC does. HE is working as an commission agent for DEC, the company
takes to risk and pays the expenses of maintaining the house. I also
heard that profit HE makes over purchase price goes to HE. It is
therefore in HE's interest to low-ball you. The reason HE gets DEC's
business is that they are very good at costing the company the lowest
out of pocket expense, i.e. the house is priced to stay on the market
less than 90 days.
I some markets that "90 day" rule causes the appraiser to severely
low-ball the appraisal becuase HE asks them to give a value that
would assure a 90 day sell. Under those rules, the appraiser is
neither objective or independent, especially in the eyes of the
homeowner.
One of my co-workers in Colorado Springs when transfering out,
took a beating. When I asked him, he said the price was consistent
with local market conditions. In Colorado Springs, you take what
you can and run like h*ll.
I unfortunately still own a home in the town and anticipate
the day I can unload it. I couldn't ask for relo since at the
time, I had it rented out. Unfortunatly, I've had to accept a
compromise and continue rent it. If I could afford to take
the gamble, it would go on the market and be sold. Like most DEC
employes, I cannot afford to make two house payments. The silver
lining is that I live in an area where the prices are now escalating
at 40+% per year.
HE is not objective, but sometimes it's the only game in town!
But for god sakes, don't ever trust real estate people or appraisers
when moving into a new area. I know many of my coworkers in Colorado
that are *stuck*.
|
922.26 | Come on, they're not *ALL* bad... | AUNTB::WARNOCK | Todd Warnock @CBO | Thu Mar 22 1990 06:42 | 15 |
| re : .25
You're making generalizations that do not hold true across the board.
All Real Estate People are not liars, as your .25 title indicates -
some of us have had very good luck with real estate people (and even
have family that do that for a living :-))
If you're unhappy fine, but given the recent problems (at least in
other notesfiles) about information leaking from notesfiles to the
public, and then someone raising hell because "...DEC is saying <insert
favorite non-DEC business here> is no good..." (not you, but DEC...),
I might suggest that you refrain from making such generalizations in
the future.
Todd
|
922.27 | insert foot..... | MORO::WALDO_IR | | Wed Mar 28 1990 14:26 | 4 |
| re; 25
Some DEC employees are also real estate agents. You may just have
screwed up your present/next job within DEC!
|
922.28 | | GUIDUK::B_WOOD | The Duke's new image, Michael Isuzu | Thu May 10 1990 19:14 | 8 |
|
> Some DEC employees are also real estate agents. You may just have
> screwed up your present/next job within DEC!
I have a job I like! I personally want to work for managers
who are focus'd on their jobs, not RE.
|