T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
669.1 | In THEORY you are right ... Do you NEED them? | KBOMFG::POST | Veni Vedi Vinci | Mon Nov 28 1988 22:51 | 41 |
| Seems quite typical in Digital nowadays. Generally speaking the manager
was wrong to make you a VERBAL OFFER. It has made you get your hopes
up high with little to hold on to.
Generally speaking YOU theoretically could claim that YOU were in the
assumption that the person making the offer to you was also eligible
to make that offer. From your note there is no indication that you
doubted this persons authority.
Again theoretically the extended verbal offer is BINDING.
That is however all THEORY.
In reality you do not have any thing to GRAB onto. It's your
word against theirs. Obviously they have made a mistake. Probably
the manager will twist the conversation saying something like
" I did not say that, he must have misunderstood me ...". What can
you do about it? Not much.
Even if you could bully them into making the contract BINDING, you
would be starting off on a BAD FOOT. What boss would like someone
in his group who MADE him DO something (for which he inevitably would
get chewed out for)?
You are right that head-count and slots should be available before interviews.
People tend to jump the gun though.
It appears that the department has given you a very open and honest insight
into their disorganisation and back-biting environement (an insight NO-ONE
ever wants to portray).
Unless the job is really FANTASTIC and you can do what ever you want, I would
learn from the experience and tell them to take a leap. After all you have
experienced, WOULD you want to WORK WITH THEM 9 hours a day?
I'm sure there are plenty of other JOB openings that would meet your
requirements.
Good luck.
|
669.2 | Verbal value | ASD::DIGRAZIA | | Tue Nov 29 1988 09:58 | 15 |
|
To help me understand this issue, I looked up the word
"verbal" in my dictionary. It means ...
verbal (adjective)
Describing something that does not have or make sense.
stuff, bilge, trash, idiocy, balderdash, blather, bunkum,
claptrap, drivel, eyewash, piffle, poppycock, rigmarole,
tomfoolery, twaddle.
verbal (adjective)
Unintelligible or foolish.
double-talk, gabble, babble, blather, blatherskite, gibberish,
jabber, prattle, twaddle.
Regards, Robert.
|
669.4 | offer + acceptance = contract | CTOAVX::WEBBER | Caroline Webber | Tue Nov 29 1988 13:13 | 10 |
|
From my memory of Business Law, an offer is not binding. It becomes
a contract when there has been an offer and an ACCEPTANCE. If there
was an acceptance, then there was a contract. If there was not,
than an offer can be retracted at any time prior to acceptance.
If you accepted, I'm not sure what position you would be in if the
person was not authorized to make you the offer. Good luck and let
us know what happens.
Caroline
|
669.5 | Things happen...typically 'cause we're human | GUIDUK::BURKE | ALL-IN-1: OA on the road to success | Tue Nov 29 1988 15:23 | 13 |
| Re: .1 and .3
Mistakes are made every day...even in the best organizations. I
know of one very good personnel department for instance, that
was told to make an offer to a potential employee for a Software
Specialist II position. Somewhere, the communications got jumbled
around, and the person was offered a Specialist III position instead.
Many of those specialists in that local office were really ticked about
this because of the persons obviously lower capability/experience
level, until they found out it was a non-retractable mistake.
Doug
|
669.6 | Get it in Writing!!!!! | UCOUNT::BAILEY | Corporate Sleuth | Tue Nov 29 1988 16:39 | 28 |
| I was taught that a verbal offer is "worth the paper it's printed
on!"
Get ALL offers IN WRITING before resigning from anything current.
Assume a verbal offer to be advance notice that you are a contender,
but not a concrete deal. You can get your work in order, think
about the transition, but don't burn your bridges.
I once worked in a planning agency in Michigan. There were two
divisions, Planning and Administration. I had a job with the
Administration Department which was government funded and due to
run out in a couple of months. The head of the Planning division
asked me into his office and told me he wanted to offer me a job
in his group which would be "permanent" and which would pay lots
more -- I was thrilled, accepted, and (fool-that-I-am!) wrote letters
of resignation and acceptance with copies to my boss and the Agency
Director. So I had formally resigned. The problem was that the
Agency Director hadn't been told about this plan and he was p****d
as hell about the other guy (who, by the way, is NOW Director!)
going "behind his back". He had nothing against me, but he prohibited
the change anyhow. So, technically, I was out of a job! My own
fault for not getting it in writing. (Fortunately my boss kindly
refused my resignation and we let it go at that...except for a lesson
well-learned!)
GET IT IN WRITING!!!
Sherry
|
669.7 | "Not real" | DIXIE1::CARNELL | DTN 351-2901 David Carnell @ATO | Tue Nov 29 1988 17:01 | 8 |
|
Words of wisdom from 20 years ago in sales.
"You have not closed the deal until you cash the check."
Thus, regarding new positions, it's not real until the day you start
work in the new job.
|
669.8 | | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Tue Nov 29 1988 18:40 | 1 |
| ... and successfully cash the first paycheck!
|
669.9 | My experience is/was normal for this area | MANFAC::GREENLAW | | Wed Nov 30 1988 09:05 | 9 |
| RE .6
If I had waited for a letter from Personnel when I joined DEC, I
would not have had a job here. The letter arrived three weeks after
I had started. I do not know how far you have to go to get a valid
offer (who has the authority to make an offer), but the paper work
is so slow that you sometimes have to accept a verbal offer.
FWIW,
Lee G.
|
669.10 | HIRING IS TIGHT | JAWS::DIAZ | La Ultima y Nos Vamos | Wed Nov 30 1988 12:31 | 39 |
| This in no way is to justify the mistake made by making a verbal
offer while the position wasn't open, but things are tight.
I found myself in a somewhat similar situation, but in the opposite
side, when I changed jobs last spring. I had been with the same
group, in different responsabilities, for about five years, and when
a reorganization happened and I was not considered for the position
that my previous manager and I had discussed, I thought it was time
for a change at which I told my new manager my intentions on looking
for a job elsewhere. As you are aware, it's been a year now that it
is very difficult to increase headcount in non-revenue producing
groups, so finding the right group with an opening is not a matter of
a few days.
The next thing my manager did was to talk to personnel, and
immediately posted my postion in the jobs book. It took me six
months to find the job that I have now (which I found very
refreshing). During that time my manager interviewed many people for
my position, but I think he always let them know that it was
contingent to me finding a job. I found myself even talking to some
of the candidates that knew me.
Again, my manager did the right thing of explaining that the slot was
not open, but my job was offered long before I left, and he didn't
extend an offer until after I left.
As side information, on the final interview round for my current job,
when I was interviewed by the personnel manager, he told me that he
still had to square out some headcount details, giving me the
impression that the position was not 100% solid, but they came
through. That tells me that hiring is still looked very closely, and
with our profits going down, I don't see that changing.
So, the fact that someone made a mistake is reprobable, but the fact
that they are very interested in you as their eagerness to extend you
the offer may show, may compensate for that mistake if the group is
worthy.
OD/
|
669.11 | I had an offer in writing... | NPOGRP::COOPER | | Wed Nov 30 1988 13:08 | 26 |
|
I while back I was extended a "VERBAL" offer for a position, digital
internal. I stated that I could not act on a verbal and that I needed
it documanted. Verbal offerings are NOT binding. YOU have the
responsibility to obtain a HARD copy. You are a busines unto yourself
it should not be embarrising to request a "contract". Even then
DEC has a way for all its good hype to screw it up. I have yet
to meet ONE good personel person. The job I started this reply
with is my shinning example. I recieved an offer in the mail (US)
and accepted the position. The Thursday bofor I was to start, (the
following Monday) I was told that there was a mistake in the offer
and that there was to be a decress in the $$ amount. I won't go
into the details, but needless to say if Digital can renig on a
formal document offer from the responsible manager then a VERBAL
offer is usless.
There are FAR too many manager who don't see what it is this company
SAYS it stands for and are out just to cover up there acts.
Hope you get the position anyway.
Good luck
Hope you still get the position
|
669.12 | Written offers CAN be expedited. | MISFIT::DEEP | The moving hand NOTEs, then having nit... | Wed Nov 30 1988 17:04 | 17 |
|
My last round of interviews with DEC was on a Friday. The following
Monday, I was supposed to be out of state at a training class for my
then current employer. At the end of the interview, we had come to
an understanding, and an offer was going to be extended.
My then current company did not have a very big training budget, and I
didn't want them to waste it on me if I was about to resign, so I asked
the District Manager to have Personnel in Maynard(?) Fed Ex the offer
to me so that I would have it in my hand on Saturday, and could give my
two week notice on Monday.
Saturday morning there was a knock on the door. It's one of the few times
I didn't mind being woken up at 7am on a Saturday! 8-)
Bob
|
669.13 | Here's a cheer for personnel | PRGMUM::FRIDAY | Patience averts the severe decree | Thu Dec 01 1988 10:11 | 22 |
| I feel obliged to recall how well I was treated by personnel.
In 1976 my wife and I returned to the US. The only job in
sight was an offer from DEC. An I got a written offer in September
of 1976. Unfortunately, a medical condition arose unexpectedly
and although I wanted to accept the offer I was going to have to
delay starting the job for three months. I wrote back explaining
the situation and DEC held the offer open for me through December.
In December I had my physical done at DEC (still not yet officially
employed) and that revealed another potential problem. At any rate,
DEC would not allow me to start without first conferring with some
medical consultant. I got the news of this possible problem a few
days before Christmas, when we were living with my dad. Needless
to say we were depressed.
On Christmas Eve personnel called late in the afternoon to say
I could start work. That care and thoughtfulness made for some
very happy people.
I bitch and bitch about DEC, but this is just one example of why
DEC is better than most other places.
Rich
|
669.14 | Wapner 101? | HOCUS::KOZAKIEWICZ | Shoes for industry | Fri Dec 02 1988 07:54 | 9 |
| RE: .4
Having absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand, but a contract
consists of an offer, acceptance and CONSIDERATION. Three elements,
not two. Consideration is something of tangible benefit to the
"offerer".
Al
|
669.15 | so whats new | FRAGLE::RICHARD | | Fri Dec 02 1988 12:57 | 27 |
| So this is still going on! (invalid verbal offers) I have heard
of this happening to both internal AND external canidates. I talked
a very good IC Test Engineer, who used to work for me at another
company, into applying for a position in Phoenix (this was several
years ago). He received a verbal offer at the end of the day with
a promise of a written followup. He never received it. He called
about a week later & was informed that they had changed their mind.
This applicant swears that he will NEVER apply for a job again at
DEC. This occurred several years ago, and he still relates/talks
about his bad experience with DEC. I wonder how many other qualified
canidates have been turned off by his experience?
BTW, I also received a verbal offer when I interviewed with DEC
back in 1975. After several weeks & no written offer, I received
a telegram to call "personnel @ DEC'. When I called in, they asked
me when I was going to reply to their offer. I said "what offer".
Seems like they forgot to send it out!!!!!!!!!!! Anyway, things
got straightened out, I got my offer & joined DEC almost 13 years
ago. Its a darn good thing that I didn't need a job right away,
or other companies were bidding for my services....Between the lost
offer, a physical that needed special approval by the DEC doctor,
etc., the whole thing took over two months to finalize!
dr
|
669.16 | It if "ain't" in writing... | RANCHO::GOLDSTEIN | Looking for that open door | Fri Dec 02 1988 19:31 | 10 |
| hmmm, interesting. I always thought that unless you had a written
offer, there was no guarantee that you actually HAD the job. I have
been told that if you had an offer letter, then there were some
legal implications.
I dunno...maybe I'm just a skeptic. I wouldn't believe a verbal
offer.
jg
|
669.17 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Mon Dec 05 1988 09:08 | 8 |
| An oral contract is just as binding as a written one (both are "verbal,"
by the way), but the problem has always been establishing that it was
properly framed and that it actually existed.
If your discussions were witnessed, then you could press for compliance
or an alternative. (Legally, "sue for specific performance" or
"sue for damages.")
But as has been noted, who could work comfortably with a boss when you
had to hold a gun to his head to get the job?
|
669.18 | | HYDRA::ECKERT | Jerry Eckert | Mon Dec 05 1988 23:22 | 16 |
| re: .14
> Having absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand, but a contract
> consists of an offer, acceptance and CONSIDERATION. Three elements,
> not two. Consideration is something of tangible benefit to the
> "offerer".
The future services of the offeree should be sufficient consideration.
If a donative promise (a promise to make a gift without consideration)
is relied upon by the promisee in a manner that should reasonably
have been expected by the promisor, the promise may be legally
enforceable to the extent of the reliance.
|
669.19 | Moot Point | BMT::BOWERS | Count Zero Interrupt | Tue Dec 20 1988 15:54 | 7 |
| The enforcability of such offers may be moot in any case. Since
most states in the U.S. operate under a doctrine of employment at
will, you can be fired at any time for any reason (except those
specifically invalidated by statute). You could, perhaps, force
someone to hire you, but you can't force them to keep you on.
-dave
|
669.20 | When in doubt, look at the req. | DELNI::LEBLANC | | Tue Dec 20 1988 23:08 | 12 |
|
When in doubt, (when someone mentions headcount "administration"
needs to be worked) ask to see a signed personnel requisition.
In the field particularly, where reqs. are in many cases gated on
some new contract for revenue, the managers will try to line you
up before the req is signed.
If you get a verbal, do not accept until you get the follow up written
offer. Your manager might extend a verbal to replace you, (binding)
and then not be able to keep you. Your on the street at that point.
fun huh??
|
669.21 | Wrongful Termination, FYI | SPGOGO::LEBLANC | Ruth E. LeBlanc | Tue Feb 14 1989 12:52 | 10 |
| Re .19
Just for the record, I believe Massachusetts has a Wrongful Termination
statute now (at least it did a couple years ago -- don't know if
it's been retracted). It means that a company CAN'T just fire you
without proper justification. It used to be that they couldn't
fire you only if you were protected under EEO statutes, but now
they have to show cause. Of course, there's a more legal way to
say all that, but, you catch my drift.
|
669.22 | | GIGI::SHERMAN | Barnacle 1 | Tue Apr 18 1989 17:03 | 5 |
| "A verbal offer isn't worth the paper it's printed on."
KBS
|
669.23 | | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Soaring to new heights | Wed Apr 19 1989 00:16 | 1 |
| ... unless there is a disinterested witness.
|
669.24 | The value of words... | CGOO01::DTHOMPSON | | Sun Apr 23 1989 22:29 | 9 |
| re: .22
A verbal contract is worth no less than those entering into it.
My sympathies they [the contracts and the people] have no value in
your world.
Don
|
669.25 | quotation, not personal ethics | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Soaring to new heights | Mon Apr 24 1989 01:14 | 8 |
| Re: .24
Please note that .22 used quotation marks to quote a very old and
well-known legal maxim concerning the difficulties of enforcing oral
contracts. The way I read .22, he was not expressing his own sense of
ethics, but rather was quoting the legal practicality. I am not willing
to turn the quotation into a personal implication, however lugubriously
expressed.
|