T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
592.2 | If you push the issue, you both might have to change | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | | Wed Aug 10 1988 11:30 | 5 |
| Normal working hours are 8:15 to 5:00, with a 45-minute lunch and
two breaks. "Flextime" is a defacto policy in engineering, but
there's nothing written down to support it.
MATT
|
592.3 | I don't think you'll get anything written | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Aug 10 1988 11:31 | 16 |
| I bet you're going to find that there isn't any official policy
on flextime. Ask your personnel people... When I started working
at DEC (12 1/2 years ago), I was told that official hours were 8:15
to 5, so for the first few weeks, I worked 8:15 to 5 - with an hour's
commute each way since DEC would not pay to relocate me and it was
a few years before I could afford to move closer - and I am not
a morning person. Eventually I got tired of being the only person
in the department in at that time (the whole group was made up of "night
people" like me) for nearly an hour every morning, so I asked the
boss what the hours REALLY were. He told me that it was "unofficial
flextime", so I started working 9-6:30, which I still do (except
these days it is more like 8:30 to 7, since I can get home on foot
in ten minutes if I hustle). Other engineers here work from 6-3
in the summer (we have a few notorious "morning people" in this
group). A few folks work mostly from home. But I don't think there
is any official policy across the company.
|
592.4 | See, mostly, section 6.40 of PP&P | DR::BLINN | I'm pink, therefore I'm Spam | Wed Aug 10 1988 12:54 | 47 |
| There actually is a corporate personnel policy, but I don't
think it says what you want; it's section 6.40 in the Orange
Book. I've extracted the current version from the ORANGEBOOK
infobase, and here's what it says about "Work Schedules":
Work Schedules Effective: 10-AUG-87
Section: 6.40
POLICY
Work schedules are established by appropriate management at each
Digital facility.
PRACTICE
Regular Work Week (R40)
In the U.S. the following guidelines apply:
o 5 days, 40 hour/week
o 1/2 or 3/4 hour unpaid lunch period, exclusive of the 40
hours above
o a 10-minute paid break during the first half of the shift,
another 10-minute paid break in the second half of the shift.
NOTE: Information on Special Work Weeks appears in Section 6.41 of
this manual.
[There's more, dealing primarily with hourly employees. See the
VTX infobase if you want the details.]
So, as you can see, if your local management has determined that
working 9:15 to 6:00 makes more sense for your facility, then
that's what you'll work. HOWEVER, I doubt that that's the case; I
suspect that if your manager was pushed, he'd find that the
"appropriate management" hasn't determined that his schedule is
appropriate for your site. He might even find that your chosen
schedules are more appropriate than what he's comfortable with.
Of course, pushing hard (from either side) could degenerate into a
"lose-lose" situation. If you can negotiate a compromise, perhaps
you can all win.
Tom
|
592.5 | Oh well.... | ADVAX::BCLARK | B.C. | Wed Aug 10 1988 13:54 | 6 |
| Thanks for your quick answers. They aren't what we were hoping
for, but that's life!
thanks again,
Bob
|
592.6 | excuses are for failures | POBOX::BRISCOE | | Thu Aug 11 1988 15:47 | 27 |
| let's add another wrinkle - work hours are determined by "facility"
thus each facility may have their own "facility hours" which become
the appropriate work hours for all employees in that facility unless
special arrangements except those hours.
ie: the "work hours" for my unit are 8:15am to 5:00pm because that
is the published "facility" hours for this building.
In practice here in sales support, our hours are really our customer
hours. I have some people working onsite who may start at 8:00am,
8:30am or 9:00am because that is when their customer starts work.
I expect my people to be at work by 8:15am here at the office if
they are coming here, I expect them to be "on time" by my customers
definition when they are appearing at a customer location, and
I really don't track comings and goings so long as the work gets
done.
But if the work is NOT getting done, then I expect them to adhere
to the facility hours just as I do.
I guess I am saying that lets be flexible and creative - the idea
is to get the job done not punch a clock
Tim B
|
592.7 | A small chuckle... | COGMK::BUDA | Putsing along... | Thu Aug 11 1988 23:29 | 16 |
|
> But if the work is NOT getting done, then I expect them to adhere
>to the facility hours just as I do.
> I guess I am saying that lets be flexible and creative - the idea
>is to get the job done not punch a clock
Re .6; I always thought if you do not do the work, you will not
have a job so that you can adhere to the facility hours! :-)
I could not chuckle a little at what was said and what was actually
meant.
- mark
|
592.8 | Our "rules" | VAXRT::WILLIAMS | | Fri Aug 12 1988 09:35 | 13 |
| Our "rules" seem to be (by observation):
1) Get your assigned tasks done
2) If you are scheduled to come to a meeting, attend it
3) If you screw up on 1) or 2) you may be required to be present
during the "facility standard hours".
A software engineering group (as if that needs to be said).
/s/ Jim Williams
|
592.9 | I need a rest | ADVAX::BCLARK | B.C. | Fri Aug 12 1988 11:40 | 5 |
| I've decided to take it easy for a while. I've been working
just too damn hard lately. I'm going to start working our bosses
hours !!! I can use a rest!
no joke!
|
592.10 | My $.02 worth | MANFAC::GREENLAW | | Sat Aug 13 1988 15:59 | 19 |
| OK, you got me!
Do we (DEC) value the differences or don't we?!?
Part of this value is to let each person produce to the best of
their abilities. I am a semi-morning person (I hate to get up but
I do my best work early). Others are better able to work late into
the night. My feeling is that if there is a problem with an employee
not producing, it will not be solved by a time sheet, and the global
"everyone will follow this policy" will only frustrate the best
performers. I saw this solution in action and when the manager
said everyone will work 8 to 5 with an hour at noon for lunch, that
group suddenly became less productive.
A good manager treats each person as an individual and solves problems
one-on-one. A poor manager quotes the "book". Flame/off
Lee G.
|
592.11 | Why sit in the traffic jams... | STOAT::BARKER | Jeremy Barker - NAC Europe - REO2-G/K3 | Sun Aug 14 1988 20:03 | 17 |
| I work in Engineering in England. Officially we work a 37.5 hour week,
9:00 to 17:30 with 1 hour for lunch.
Because I find it simpler I base my work schedule on a 40 hour week. I
generally work from 10:00 to 19:00 with 1 hour for lunch. Quite often I
work longer hours. There are two reasons why I work these hours. First, I
absolutely hate getting up in the morning (and rarely go to bed before
midnight or later). Second, if I did arrive at the office by 9:00 it would
take me about 1 hour with the amount of traffic on the roads around here -
and almost as long to get home if I left before 18:30 in the evening. As
it is my commute is a pleasant 20 minute drive.
I have a simple answer to the "you will be here by 9:00" person. "I will
be here by 9:00 if you insist, but I will also go home at exactly 17:30."
This usually has the desired effect.
jb
|
592.12 | early bird special | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | Mos Eisley, it ain't | Mon Aug 15 1988 08:01 | 9 |
| Here in SPO we have flextime as follows -
Core hours are 8:00 AM - 2:30 PM
There is a two-hour 'window', meaning that you can start work
anytime between 6:00 AM and 8:00 AM, and leave after working your
eight hours. A great many people choose to rise early and work
6:00 - 2:30. Others prefer to start later.
Note: this is for hourly workers in a mfg. plant.
|
592.13 | Customer Sat? | MORO::WALDO_IR | | Mon Aug 15 1988 13:17 | 9 |
| Customer Response Representative: Yes, Mr. Customer, our contract
does say that we will response to your needs at 08:00 but our engineers
are on 'flex-time' and I don't know when someone will be in. Would
you like to talk to the Field Service Manager when he comes in?
Flex time is great if you or your group can afford it!
Irv Waldo
SWA System Support
|
592.14 | 24 X 7... can we back it up? | NOVA::M_DAVIS | returns like a spot on a M�bius strip | Mon Aug 15 1988 14:11 | 9 |
| re -1:
This has become a major topic of conversation recently in support
cirlces... we contract with the customer for "continuous effort"
and yet, in order to satisfy their needs, this often means a workaround
or fix. Since the field does not own the sources, we are bound
to the availability of Engineering.
Marge
|
592.15 | and we are worldwide! | NOVA::M_DAVIS | returns like a spot on a M�bius strip | Mon Aug 15 1988 14:14 | 4 |
| ...of course the advantage is that someone working flex hours may
be working straight hours in GIA terms...
:^)
|
592.16 | Flexi's OK but flexibility is better. | SPGOPS::MAURER | We come in peace; Shoot to kill | Mon Aug 15 1988 14:24 | 25 |
| re .13
Yes, flexi-time is clearly inappropriate for some type of job,
particularly those jobs which involve rapid response to contracted
customer situations.
However, for jobs which have little or no customer contact, flexi-time
solves many problems for Digital, for the employees and for communities
in which Digital facilities are located.
When I worked in UK HQ in Reading, flexi-time was introduced with the
usual core hours and flexi boundaries as an experiment. The 6 month
experiment finished some while ago but has (in my opinion) been very
successful. The only stipulation on the scheme was that no group should
be entirely unmanned during normal working hours (9 - 5:30).
With the traffic situation in Reading being what it was (and still is),
this helped tremendously and with no downside that I ever saw.
Above all, I think flexibility (as opposed to flexi-time) is the key
issue. I have never worked in any part of Digital (including a field
office) which has not been flexible about working hours. I would
probably not want to work in such a group or organisation.
Jon
|
592.17 | Still dreamin' | ADVAX::BCLARK | Member of Rom_of_Month Club | Mon Aug 15 1988 14:32 | 4 |
| And while I'm at it, what about a 4 day work week?
still dreamin'
Bob
|
592.18 | Now you mention it .... | SPGOPS::MAURER | We come in peace; Shoot to kill | Mon Aug 15 1988 16:36 | 14 |
| re .17
> And while I'm at it, what about a 4 day work week?
I understand from a colleague in Germany that this is now possible, but
involves some sort of a trade-off concerning vacation time (up to 42
days per year) pension, retirement age etc and *without* flexi-time
being in operation !
I also know one person who works in DEC Switzerland (not EHQ) that has
negotiated a 4 day week for himself and used an article in Management
Memo by Ken Olsen to help persuade his management to agree.
Jon
|
592.19 | 4-day workweek has been done, too | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Tue Aug 16 1988 09:57 | 13 |
| During the last gasoline crisis (lemme see, when was that, anyhow,
1983? These artificially-concocted crises are too frequent for
me!), there were several people in engineering who worked a four-day
week (4 10-12 hour days instead of 5 10-12 hour days like we usually
work) to conserve gasoline or because they could only buy gasoline
on odd or even days depending on their license plate numbers,
especially people who had a very long commute. Since most of these
people had terminal at home even then, I don't think that any less
work got done, but it made things a bit easier to take.
I didn't do the 4-day week - at the time I only had a 15-minute
commute anyhow, and I only bought gas every couple of weeks (I stayed
home on weekends to avoid getting stranded somewhere with no gas).
|
592.20 | Traffic problems here, too | ANT::MORRISON | Bob M. LMO2/P41 296-5357 | Thu Aug 25 1988 19:40 | 12 |
| Nobody on this side of the pond has commented on the effects of flextime on
traffic, so I will. It is a dual effect; people who avoid rush hours can same
a lot of time and stress in commuting, and if a large percentage of the work-
force is on flextime it can reduce the traffic volume during rush hours. That
in turn, makes it easier for people (inside and outside DEC) who are locked
into a standard schedule.
For those of you who are not familiar with the Marlboro/Maynard area, we are
plagued with a serious combination of circumstances: rapid business and resi-
dential growth, an antiquated road system (except for a few highways) which is
being improved at turtle speed, and almost no public transportation. As was
said, most DEC plants here have de-facto flextime but an official DEC policy
on flextime would help solve the traffic problem and improve our image.
|
592.21 | | MUNICH::JAERVINEN | Peace thru superior firepower | Fri Aug 26 1988 04:45 | 9 |
| DEC Munich has had flextime for quite a few years now (seven?).
The core time is 9:00 - 11:30, 13:30 - 15:30 (14:30 on Fridays).
Special rules aplly to support groups etc. that have to be manned
during specific times.
Your monthly balance must be withing �10 hours of that months
'standard' working hours (8 * # of working days). The 'standard'
workweek at DEC is still 40 hours here (an exception nowadays).
|
592.22 | Traffic,Grrrrr! | FSTVAX::GALLO | Tom Gallo - Field Service Training | Fri Aug 26 1988 08:38 | 20 |
|
re: .20 "Commuter Stress"
I work in the Bedford training center and I find it *much*
better to set my own hours.I get *extremely* frustrated and
stressed out in traffic.I guess it's sort of a "Hot Button" for
me.
We don't really have an official flex policy.Its always been
implied that,when you are not teaching,we don't care whether you
work in your cube (I do) or at home,just be prepared when it is
time to teach.
If I had to negotiate Rt. 3 everyday during rush hour,I'd go
insane! :-)
_TomG_
|
592.23 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Where was George? | Fri Aug 26 1988 10:09 | 6 |
| RE: .20 "Traffic problems in Maynard"
You think it's bad now? Wait until all the people currently riding
Digital Commuter Vans start driving to work in their own cars.
|
592.24 | 80% pay, 100% work - and satisfied! | SKYWAY::BENZ | Service(d) with a smile | Wed Aug 31 1988 12:36 | 28 |
| As already mentioned earlier, flexibility is valued greatly at Digital,
but not everybody seems to know it (I am talking tongue-in-cheek,
it took me over a year to get my management to listen). If you need
arguments, I suggest you look up the "mgmt memo" Volume 7, #1, dated
February 1988. It's lead article is headed "Future Challenges of
a Changing Work Force". Some extracts:
" To acquire the people we need, Digital must be viewed as a company
that vlues its people; ac ompany that is flexible and tries to
accommodate the changing needs of its employees "
and
" Flexibility in work schedules is also important because people
with highly-specialized skills -- such as software engineering --
are becoming scarce. One way to deal with the scarcity of people
is to recruit part-time professionals -- people who prefer a reduced
work week for family reasons or because of outside interest "
As far as I concerned, the company made a pretty good deal when
they put me on 80% time (four days/week), as, of course, they cut
my salary 20% at the same time, but I still do pretty much the same
volume of work.
Good luck to anybody who is doing that battle at the moment.
Regards,
Heinrich
|
592.25 | | WORDS::KRISTY | Certified Hug Therapist | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:43 | 63 |
|
Let's add a new twist to the flex hours scenario.
Hired to work 8 am - 5 pm, Monday thru Friday with the understanding
that there would be some overtime involved. (nights and/or occasionally
weekends)
Have worked for 12 months working 40 regular hours and 8 hours of
Overtime per week.
After numerous attempts at changing my work schedule (preliminary
stages), looking at the options given to me by my manager and my
supervisor (acting), I have come to the conclusion that none of them
are really suitable to me.
I am married, have a child in daycare, and we have one automobile for
transportation.
My manager is trying to cut back expenses in as many areas as possible.
I don't blame him for this since he is getting heat from upper
management to do this.
The current work schedule is under consideration at this time, and
although I'm not too unhappy with it, there are some things included in
this schedule that definitely don't settle with me. It is as follows:
Monday 9 am - 5 pm 8 pm - 9 pm
Tuesday 11 am - 5 pm 7 pm - 10 pm
Wednesday 9 am - 5 pm 8 pm - 9 pm
Thursday 10 am - 5 pm 8 pm - 10 pm
Friday 9 am - 5 pm 7 pm - 8 pm
Does working the above schedule fall under any shift differential
stuff?
The reason that this schedule is not feasible is because:
1. Having only one automobile for transportation, I would have to
arrive at 8:00 (my husband needs to be at work by 8:30 at the latest),
leaving me between 1 and 3 hours to do nothing. If I come into the
office, I will most likely work. (which would be considered OT)
2. Call it 'being a working mother guilt trip', but I see little
enough of my family as it is. Working from home at night allows me to
be in the presence of my family, but I'm not really "with" them.
3. I presented an alternative of rehiring our Site Services
Operations staff to perform the backups on our timesharing machine.
This would cause an additional $20K increase to one of the group's
four cost centers per year. This additional cost is not acceptable
to my manager. Although the additional cost is there, rehiring the
Site Operations staff would allow me to retain my 8-5 work schedule
with occasional overtime. Another alternative that I suggested is
that management promote me to a WC 4 position (a D14 - Operations
Analyst position). Needless to say, that didn't go over very well
either.
Is there any 'legal' way that a manager can force an employee to
work an altered work schedule without that employee's agreement?
At this point, it seems like neither I or my boss are really willing
to give in. A compromise needs to be worked out. Anyone have any
ideas?
|
592.26 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Basically a Happy Camper | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:50 | 4 |
| Have you gone to personnel for help/suggestions? I'd try that.
Then there is always to option of going over your bosses head.
Alfred
|
592.27 | | WORDS::KRISTY | Certified Hug Therapist | Wed Aug 31 1988 17:29 | 6 |
| Yes, I have gone to Personnel (at the PSA level). I will be meeting
with the Personnel Managers' Manager sometime later this week.
I've spoken with one of the other managers in my group and he gave
me some more ideas to work on. Hopefully something can be worked
out. It would be nice to have a win-win situation for a change...
:-)
|
592.28 | | NOVA::M_DAVIS | Old-fashioned Grin Mill | Wed Aug 31 1988 17:36 | 5 |
| Certainly if your management wishes concessions from you, Kristy,
then they should also have something to offer you in return.
As you so aptly said, "win-win".
Marge
|
592.29 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | The only way out is through | Fri Sep 02 1988 15:40 | 11 |
| I can't imagine anyone justifying asking an employee to work every
day *and* every evening. Having a couple of mornings free until
10 or 11 am hardly makes up for giving up all your evening time
including Friday evenings.
Amazing...I thought those kinds of schedules were abolished when
the textile industry was automated!
Fight it.
Holly
|
592.30 | Any support appreciated | SAGE::ROSS | A Prayer for Owen Meany | Tue Apr 11 1989 15:52 | 10 |
| I'd be interested in hearing {via mail} from anyone who is currently
involved in a flex-time situation. I'm trying to alter my work schedule
so that I don't have to be physically at my desk on a single day of the
week so that I can take care of my son and have had little success with
management or personnel, despite my offers to work off-hours on that day,
or working from home partially, or working longer days...
I'm looking for examples within Digital that I can use for support.
Thanks.
|
592.31 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Protect the guilty, punish the innocent | Tue Apr 11 1989 16:33 | 11 |
| RE: .30 The Salem (NIO) manufacturing facility has had official
flex time for years (at least 7). I don't believe it allows 4 day
weeks explicitly though. That is a problem for WC-2 people the way
the overtime laws are written. For WC-4 I don't see a problem though.
In the past I have worked nights rather then days unofficially but with
management support. As long as you job doesn't require you to be
in the office at set times it's not usually a problem in the
engineering groups I've been part of or worked with.
Alfred
|