T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
544.1 | no such thing as free advertising | CVG::THOMPSON | Let's move Engineering to Florida | Mon May 23 1988 14:08 | 7 |
| I doubt that there is *anything* on that car that someone didn't
pay for. I believe that the Ferrari people do use our gear but
I believe that DEC pays something/somehow to have the logo on the
car. I seem to remember reading something about this in the marketing
conference at ASIMOV::MARKETING.
Alfred
|
544.2 | Not exactly free... | HILLST::MASON | Explaining is not understanding | Mon May 23 1988 15:16 | 7 |
| Look up the note entitled:
FERRARI WINS JAPAN GP
or something very close in MARKETING.
Gary
|
544.3 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | | Mon May 23 1988 18:04 | 6 |
| There's a wonderful poster that DEC (Italy?) was distributing
which shows a wide-angle close-up of the F1 racer, prominently
featuring the |d|i|g|i|t|a|l| logo on the nose of the car.
Sorry, but I don't see any sort of order code on the poster.
Atlant
|
544.4 | any info | BPOV06::MIOLA | Phantom | Mon May 23 1988 20:51 | 5 |
|
Sounds good, anybody know where we can get some.
Lou
|
544.5 | Some info.... | FOOT::RUSSELL | Peter, from the sunny Crescent... | Tue May 24 1988 06:42 | 12 |
| Ferrarri traditionaly do not sell advertising space on their cars,
but only allow companies who are directly helpful to the F1 cars
to advertise. (They don't need to, since FIAT underwrite them.)
Yes, Digital Italy do have a tie up with them; their designer
is a guy called (I think) John Bernard, who actually lives in the
UK. He uses a micro-vax linked to the Modena headquarters.
And no, salesmen do not get free ferrarri's as their decmobiles....
Peter.
|
544.6 | Try the ACT in Turin for the Poster !! | DCC::LANE | Work ? Not now, I'm reading Notes. | Tue May 24 1988 14:32 | 7 |
| Regarding the poster.
I got mine at the DEC ACT in Turin. If you have friends there,
you may be in luck !!!
David
aus M�nchen
|
544.7 | | BISTRO::WLODEK | W.Stankiewicz, Comms support, VBO | Fri May 27 1988 16:07 | 2 |
|
No, it was just my Ferrari ( dreaming on behalf of Bruno C.)
|
544.8 | "INSIGHT" provides insights... | SPGOGO::LEBLANC | Ruth E. LeBlanc | Wed Jun 29 1988 15:53 | 8 |
| If anyone's interested, there's an article in the June 1988 "INSIGHT"
magazine (Vol 8, No. 5) about DEC's involvement with Ferrari. The
title of the two-page article is "Ferrari Teams with Digital, Stays
on Track with Networked Systems".
I won't try to paraphrase what it says, but it's Order No. EJ-31099-32
if anyone wants to get it through Northboro Printing & Circulation.
|
544.9 | How about a media blitz, like a scorched ad policy... | WKRP::CHATTERJEE | I fought the lawn and the lawn won | Mon Feb 13 1989 17:51 | 15 |
| Speaking of "free advertising", why do we not advertise ourselves
more aggressively as a company? Sure, "Digital has it now" is all
over the trade journals. But, the man in the street knows I*M before
he can talk. GE advertises all over the place. But, even in my
own family (not home, but extended) people ask where I work and
they always think or guess I*M. And, there are TWO of us who work
at DEC, the other one being my wife's uncle in Field Service for
eleven years. Does anyone else out there feel we need to spread
the gospel a little wider, like I feel? You, know "solid as Sears",
"a piece of the rock", "make money the old fashioned way....", why
not a DEC household impact that will make us instantly known outside
the techie world ?????????
........... Suchindran
|
544.10 | wrong market | MORO::NEWELL_JO | Recovering Perfectionist | Tue Feb 14 1989 15:07 | 10 |
|
re: .9
Because for the most part Digital is not selling to Mr. and Ms.
Consumer. We tried that market already and found ourselves a
day late and a dollar short. On to bigger and better things...
Jodi-
|
544.11 | Very simply... | WMOIS::D_MONTGOMERY | Bop 'Til You Drop | Wed Feb 15 1989 08:17 | 7 |
| : why
: not a DEC household impact that will make us instantly known outside
: the techie world ?????????
Because we're a techie company, and KO likes it that way.
-Monty-
|
544.12 | Perhaps ASIMOV::MARKETING is a more appropriate forum | DR::BLINN | Trust me... I'm a Doctor... | Wed Feb 15 1989 10:38 | 11 |
| I don't think that we're a "techie" company any more. We were
once, but those days are behind us.
However, we're not selling "household" goods, so there's no
reason for us to have household impact.
In any case, this general topic has been beaten to death over
and over in the ASIMOV::MARKETING conference; perhaps it would
make sense to revive it there, rather than here.
Tom
|
544.13 | A some point it nice to become a Coke, Xerox, Band-Aid, Benz...... | WKRP::CHATTERJEE | I fought the lawn, & the lawn won | Wed Feb 15 1989 10:38 | 10 |
| >>>>>> Because we're a techie company, and KO likes it that way.
Being a techie myself, I agree with the above statement. But, unless
we become a household name it would be hard to vie against the saying,
albeit ridiculous to us VAXen, that "you cannot get fired for buying
I*M". It is like being attacked by a rhino: I know they are
vegeterian, you know they are vegetarian, but do THEY KNOW THEY
ARE VEGETARIAN............
......Suchindran
|
544.14 | I can't read K.O.'s mind; can you? | DR::BLINN | Trust me... I'm a Doctor... | Wed Feb 15 1989 10:45 | 18 |
| RE: .13 (notes collision) -- Having "consumer" recognition of
Digital as a computer company in the average American household
(or households in other parts of the world, for that matter) will
not change the perception in the business world that "You can't
get fired for buying IBM". In any case, that perception is less
widely accepted today than it was ten years ago.
When I see a statement from Ken Olsen that Digital is a techie
company, he likes it that way, and he wants it to stay that way,
I'll believe that that's what he believes and likes. Please don't
attribute attitudes or opinions to him that you can't support by
reference to his recently stated beliefs and opinions. The things
I've seen attributed to him recently (in, e.g., MGMT MEMO) suggest
that while he values Digital's heritage as an engineering company,
he would probably not agree that we're a "techie" company or that
our future fortunes lie in appealing only to a "technical" market.
Tom
|
544.15 | it don't hurt to be known | NYEM1::MILBERG | Barry Milberg | Wed Feb 15 1989 10:53 | 15 |
| A number of companies have used mass media advertising, even though
they sell nothing to the 'general public'. Campaigns like "A company
called TRW" come to mind.
That advertising is known as "institutionaladvertising" and one
of the effects (and reasons) is:
TO RAISE THE AWARENESS AND THE STOCK PRICE
Name awareness also helps when you walk in the door on a 'cold call'.
Can't think how many 'new' customers have asked who we are or if
we're a local, little computer company!
-Barry-
|
544.16 | | HAMER::JILSON | Door handle to door handle | Wed Feb 15 1989 20:24 | 9 |
|
> A number of companies have used mass media advertising, even though
> they sell nothing to the 'general public'. Campaigns like "A company
> called TRW" come to mind.
I'm sure that TRW would be very disappointed to know that they sell nothing
to the general public. Ask any automobile performance nut and you will
soon find out that TRW does indeed sell very much indeed to the general
public.
|
544.17 | | PENPAL::PHILBROOK | Chico's Daddy | Thu Feb 16 1989 12:38 | 14 |
| I believe Ken Olson thinks of advertising as secondary to product
performance. In other words, let the products speak for themselves.
Digital prefers to sponsor beneficial programs (like Infinite Voyage)
to do good for its community while getting a small plug for the
Digital name; thereby associating the company name with something
good rather than always trying to push computers on John Q. Public
- who wouldn't/couldn't buy one anyway.
I have an argument for advertising the name to make it a household
word, but at the same time, I can't help but agree with the current
corporate advertising philosophies.
Mike
|
544.18 | | SALEM::RIEU | Sanitized for your protection | Thu Feb 16 1989 14:57 | 3 |
| I'd rather see us with no commercials at all rather than those
stupid ones that Wang uses.
Denny
|
544.19 | Who??? | FRAGLE::CONNELLY | Richard Connelly DTN/234-5315 | Thu Apr 20 1989 13:59 | 4 |
|
Wang? Wang who???
There are only two computer companies, Digitial and IBM.
|
544.20 | I*M? I thought they were a typewriter company? | GUIDUK::BURKE | Breaking through my walls! | Tue May 02 1989 02:31 | 1 |
|
|
544.22 | set hidden by mod - GLK | TOPDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Sat May 06 1989 13:08 | 14 |
544.23 | guest editorials as free advertisement | SUBPAC::OLDIGES | | Fri May 06 1994 17:41 | 23 |
|
Just to bring this old note back to the surface, why doesn't the upper
management take advantage of "free" advertising? Guest editorials written
by BP or other members of the SLT will help to bring the public image
of Digital up a few notches. Last year, BP wrote in an editorial or letter
to the editor of the Boston Globe about how the Clinton administrations'
redefining of the measure of a supercomputer will help computer companies
(like Digital) sell their products in foreign markets. I thought it was
well written and I think it gives the general public a different view
of a company that they usually hear about through the eyes of the media
or advertisers. By "targeting" certain newspapers, we could target
the group of people we most want to influence.
I am suggesting that someone (with a "name") write an article on some
positive aspect of the company or about something that occurs in recent
history that will or did have an influence on high tech companies. A
good example might be the recent elections in South Africe, with Nelson
Mandela scoring big points there and how this will have an effect
on business, and in particular, Digital's business.
Any comments?
Phil
|