Title: | The Digital way of working |
Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5321 |
Total number of notes: | 139771 |
I posted the following note in a PRIVATE notes conference dedicated to discussion of NON-WORK RELATED NOTES FILES. Since that conference is PRIVATE, I won't identify it here (however you can look back a few notes [111.*] and locate it). As author of the note, I do choose to re-post the note here for your consideration. <<< XXXXXX::DEBATE.NOTE;1 >>> -< Discussion of Non-work related files >- ================================================================================ Note 7.0 One suggested alternative for NWRNFs. No replies MMO01::RESENDE "Steve @MMO" 29 lines 3-MAY-1986 01:54 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Since one of the principal arguments repeated over and over and over and over against "non-work related" notes files is that they utilize company owned resources, I'll offer a suggestion for your consideration. Depending on the size of the non-work related noters community and the importance of noting to them, would we be willing to "subscribe" by contributing some sort of subscription fee of say $20/year to fund the purchase and maintenance of a noting system? I have no figures, but if there perhaps 5000 noters each contributing $20, that would provide $100,000 to purchase and establish a system whereon non-work related notes files could reside. Assuming internal transfer prices on the acquisition, that translates into a LOT of disk and a suitable driver CPU of one or more uVAXes. Such a system (cluster?) might contain ALL non-work related conferences and thus free up (disk) resources throughout the corporation. Of course this would not address the utilization of network resources; I don't have an answer for that. We'd need more reliable numbers to see the practicality of such a scheme, but it would remove one big oft-repeated argument against non-work related notes. And to me, the benefits of noting are well worth more than that paltry sum. I will be the first to offer an initial contribution. My question is, is this at all a feasible suggestion? Assuming codes of ethics and noters societies are still pursued, is noting worth a few dollars to anyone else? Steve
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
115.1 | Internal transfer pricing | MMO01::RESENDE | Steve @MMO | Sat May 03 1986 03:14 | 9 |
Please note that the "internal transfer price" I mentioned could result in a SUBSTANTIAL amplification of the funds collected. Since we can't be sure that information posted in a note won't find its way "elsewhere", I won't post what I understand this ITP to be, but suffice it to say it's quite low. I'll be glad to communicate by secure mail with individuals or someone else can post the ITP if they (1) know it for sure and (2) think it's "proper" to do so. With recent happenings, I choose not to. Steve | |||||
115.2 | what price notes ?? | KAFSV5::READ | bob | Sat May 03 1986 11:40 | 83 |
nice idea, but what about: .. the terminal on my desk that digital owns? .. or the host system i'm running from? .. or the terminal switch? .. or the dial-up modems? .. or the network resources? and the list goes on. i'd be more than willing to pay for the resources that i may consume in my non-work noting if a price can be put to them, and if i can afford them! even at internal cost, this figure could add up pretty quickly, given trans-atlantic networks, cross-canada multiplexor links, etc, etc. mild ramble follows: my boss (and, therefore, the corporation) has hired me to perform a function. during my job plan and review, we come to some sort of agreement on what i can reasonable accomplish (negotiable, of course :^) and off i go ... in the course of my job, i discovered work-related notes. confer- ences such as VMSNOTES, FMS, etc, etc, have saved our department uncountable amounts of troubleshooting time, not to mention increased productivity due to new techniques learned, tools aquired, etc. and in the course of this discovery, of course i discovered non-work- related notes. very few of which interest me. last winter, i was in the market for a CD player. the CD notes file proved invaluable, supplying me with consumer information and allowing me to make an intelligent decision. and yes, the late and lamented SEXECETERA conference was part of my regular reading, giving me new insight into this diverse community known as DIGITAL EQUIMENT. i think there's three schools of thought within the corporation. i'll relate them to GAMES: 1. games have no reason to be on a DIGITAL computer, resources bought and paid for by Digital Equipment Corporation. period. 2. games can be on a DIGITAL computer, given that their use is restricted to non-work hours (sometimes pretty hard to define) for both the machine and the person. 3. games are unrestricted, relying on the fact that you have a job to do, and limited computer resources with which to do it, and relying on the fact that you're a responsible individual, and won't let games get in the way of you or anyone else performing the job that needs to be done. i worked last night until midnight. i don't get any overtime for that---it's part of the job. i was in the office at 7:30. part of the job. and when my boss "catches" me reading notes, he knows that, as a responsible employee, the job's getting done. i like my job very much. i enjoy the quality of the workplace, and i bust my bum for this company, because i feel it's the kind of institution for which i wish to work. certainly the paycheck helps, but if i REALLY felt this was not a company for which i wanted to work, i'd find something else. (i'm a pretty good short order cook!) as i stated at the beginning of this ramble, i would pay a fee to use notes. but i don't feel that i should pay a fee, given that i do my "noting" in a responsible manner, in relation to my job, my machine resources, the machine resources of the host machine, and the resources of the network. for me, "noting" is one of the "quality of the workplace" issues. for someone else, it may be the exercise room with the universal gym, or the free meeting rooms for some club. or the employee purchase programme. the list goes on. i think this incident (and i speak here of the SEXECETERA problems) is rather timely, forcing the whole issue of non-work-related notes out into the open. force it to be recognized and accepted by the corporation, or end it all. that universal gym of which i wrote earlier certainly didn't sneak in without the company's knowledge! and i, for one, would rather know where i stand. with notes, and with the company. thanks, b. | |||||
115.3 | MTV::FOLEY | I'm Frey'd | Sat May 03 1986 18:40 | 18 | |
I'm not crazy about the idea of a employee notes-network.. The idea of everything in one place defeats the purpose of Notes and when everything is in one place there is too much of a chance for something to happen.. (power hit, someone pulling the plug and saying "That's enough", etc...) I just don't think it would be worth the hassles.. I can also see someone coming along and trying to "take it over and charge mega-$$" for it.. (e.g.: Mill Communications a while back w/ the Ether in the Mill) No, Notes is a distributed product and should stay that way.. A Noters interest group is the way to go. (Please, NEVER say that word that begins with U. 'nuff said) I think you'll be hearing more about this in the near future.. Please just stay calm and ride this out.. mike | |||||
115.4 | even games have a role | RAJA::MERRILL | Glyph it up! | Wed May 21 1986 09:49 | 12 |
re: .2 GAMES have a real place ON the computer (but not being PLAYED by employees during working hours) in that they are 1. excellent demos (some of them) of our products capabilities, and 2. a (hopefully brief) educational experience for new employees, and 3. occasional entertainment for waiting visitors and other guests. Rick Merrill | |||||
115.5 | Valuable game | CHOPIN::KLOSTERMAN | Stevie K | Wed May 21 1986 13:30 | 5 |
Re:-1 The game ROGUE caused a machine check on an 8800 prototype that pinpointing an obscure bug in microcode that hadn't been found using any other methods. We're thinking about using it as a design verification tool... | |||||
115.6 | for VAX history buffs | HUMAN::CONKLIN | Peter Conklin | Wed May 21 1986 21:08 | 4 |
THE DEMO we ran at the introduction press conference (and stockholders' meeting) for the VAX-11/780 was a game--Scrabble. Ken pointed out that it had come up with an excellent play using a word that most people in the room would not have known! | |||||
115.7 | More history | LATOUR::MURPHY | Dan Murphy | Thu May 22 1986 23:16 | 4 |
Back in the 60's, a DEC engineer decided to computerize the catalog of his record collection (a personal, non-business use if I ever heard one). The program he wrote became the basis of the first SORT utility released on the PDP-10. | |||||
115.8 | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, 293-5358, VAX Architecture | Mon Sep 05 1988 10:56 | 2 | |
The engineer was Bob Clemens, MIT '64. I think he now works for BBN. |