T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
75.1 | | TOPCAT::BADGER | | Thu Jan 16 1986 11:43 | 7 |
| re:.0 has DEC stock ever been pried higher than any other....
don't think you asked the question you meant. It was at $132 recently.
Since I've been with the company, its done a 3 for 1 split, and I heard its
done a split prior to me joining the company.
ed
|
75.2 | | HUMAN::CONKLIN | | Thu Jan 16 1986 22:02 | 5 |
| Then again, what do you mean "priced higher?" And "any other computer vendor?"
Do you just mean publicly traded companies? Including over the counter? Is
it absolute price? Or price divided by earnings? or price divided by book
value? what about stock traded only on other exchanges, such as the London
or Tokyo exchanges?
|
75.3 | | OCKER::HAGARTY | | Fri Jan 17 1986 00:51 | 7 |
| Ahh Gi'day...
But then, who has the privilege of stock options...
Not I.
{dennis{{{ -- Who formally asked personnel three years ago.
|
75.4 | | HUMAN::CONKLIN | | Thu Jan 23 1986 22:15 | 20 |
| The BOSTON GLOBE, January 22, 1986....p 66ff:
(headline) DATA GENERAL EARNINGS PLUMMET....Sales for the quarter ended Dec.
28, 1985 were $293.7 million compared with $333.7 million for the same quarter
last year. Sales for the quarter included a benefit of $3.5 million in equipment
sales and income from operations or 6 cents a share in earnings from the
renegotiation of an existing long-term sales contract for equipment sold
in prior quarters....earnings for the quarter fell sharply to $1.1 million
or 4 cents a share compared with $23.0 million or 87 cents a share for the
same quarter last year.
(headline) BELL WILL LEAVE ENCORE COMPUTER
(in the stock listings) Digital 149 1/2 up 2 5/8.
IBM 149 1/2 up 1/8.
--------------------------
And Wednesday morning, Strategy Committee was all smiles......
|
75.5 | stock split | HUMAN::CONKLIN | Peter Conklin | Wed Mar 19 1986 21:22 | 2 |
| On Monday, March 17, Digital's Board of Directors decided to split
the stock 2:1.
|
75.6 | Split when? | GVAADG::ROUSSET | S. Rousset, IS_ADG (Geneva) | Thu Mar 20 1986 04:43 | 5 |
|
When will the stock split become effective? I haven't seen anything
in the newspapers yet.
St�phane.
|
75.7 | LiveWire | EDISON::FLEISCHMANN | Marc Fleischmann | Thu Mar 20 1986 07:00 | 17 |
| From "LiveWire":
[7m Digital stock splits 2-for-1 [m
Digital today (March 17) announced a 2-for-1 stock split in the
form of a 100% stock dividend. Dividend shares will be distributed
on May 9, 1986 to stockholders of record at the close of business
on April 18, 1986.
The last time Digital split its stock was in October 1976, when
the stock was split 3-for-1. The certificates representing the
additional shares will be mailed to stockholders by the company's
transfer agent, Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York. It will
not be necessary for Digital stockholders to return their
certificates.
|
75.8 | Stock Plan Effect? | EXODUS::HARROW | Jeff - The network IS the system! | Thu Mar 20 1986 12:44 | 4 |
| How does this affect those of us currently enroled in the
employee stock plan?
Jeff
|
75.9 | | KATIE::RICHARDSON | | Thu Mar 20 1986 12:50 | 7 |
| What happens to people whose stock is in the Statement of Ownership
program? Do they just state that you own more, or do they actually
send you certificates that you then have to put into the statement
of ownership? I had only been with DEC a few months when the stock
last split and was not in the stock purchase plan then (you used
to have to be employeed here for a year first, instead of six months),
and the statement of wonership program did not exist then anyhow.
|
75.10 | | EDISON::FLEISCHMANN | Marc Fleischmann | Thu Mar 20 1986 17:59 | 9 |
| Again from "Live Wire"
The stock split will have no economic effect on the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and other stock plans. The price and number of shares
will be adjusted to reflect the split. For instance, for the Employee
Purchase Plan, the beginning fair market value (from December 2) will
be cut in half and then compared against the ending (May 30) fair market
value in the normal way.
|
75.11 | Discussion in Progress Elsewhere | NY1MM::SWEENEY | Pat Sweeney | Thu Mar 20 1986 18:44 | 7 |
| The _first_ and _most_extensive_ coverage of the stock split can be
found in NY1MM::INVESTING, the conference that discusses investing,
money matters, and computing in the financial industry. You can join
the conference with a KP7.
Questions and answers of the kind in the earlier replies to this
note can be found there.
|
75.12 | You can even get there (sometimes) | LSMVAX::BLINN | Dr. Tom | Sun Mar 23 1986 20:31 | 3 |
| And, at least this afternoon, NY1MM:: is accessible.
Tom
|
75.13 | when and how much ? | SNOMAS::SANDERS | John Sanders CSC/CS 522-4348 FLASH | Wed Feb 11 1987 19:01 | 8 |
| I hope someone out there can help me on this on....
When was Digital stock first offered on the open market ??
and how much did it sell for ??
Thank-You in advance
|
75.14 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Pat Sweeney | Wed Feb 11 1987 20:39 | 8 |
| The exact numbers are living in a financial data base somewhere,
and maybe even in a Digital library.
[From memory] Around 1966, American Research and Development "cashed
in" their one big winner, Digital Equipment Corporation. The initial
public offering was for about $20 million (?2 million shares @$10), the
stock was first listed on the American Stock Exchange, and a few years
later moved to the New York Stock Exchange where it is today.
|
75.15 | 1966 was a good year to buy | MINAR::BISHOP | | Wed Feb 11 1987 21:10 | 4 |
| Remember that the stock has split more than once! Each share today
is only a fraction (one sixth?) of one of the original shares.
-John Bishop
|
75.16 | the 1970's is where the action happened | CURIE::MASSEY | | Thu Feb 12 1987 07:57 | 9 |
| re: .14 and .15
[From memory]American Research and Development "cashed" in their
stocks in 1974 or 1975 for $350 Million dollars. They had to
do this as part of the requirements ARD layed on TEXTRON to
acquire ARD. ARD gave this to their stockholders before the
merger was completed.
The stock split in 1975 3 for 1 (it was selling for $180 +/-).
|
75.17 | a nit | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Thu Feb 12 1987 13:34 | 5 |
| The 3-for-1 DEC stock split must have been in 1976, not 1975, since
I remember being here when it happened but was not yet in the stock
purchase plan (you used to have to have been in the company for
a year to join it; I think it is now 6 months), and I started in
January, 1976.
|
75.18 | FYI | JUNIOR::TASSONE | Happy Valentine's Day | Fri Feb 13 1987 16:18 | 3 |
| Just for general knowledge, if you purchased 1 share of stock back
when it was first sold and you didn't buy any other shares, that
1 share would have become 18 shares by 1986 (because of the splits).
|
75.19 | | WEOV01::SADLER | Son of a Beach | Thu Mar 05 1987 15:29 | 4 |
| Not a bad return on the investment then, $10 = over $2700 now
.jim.
|
75.20 | Magellian claims better | SYSEFS::MCCABE | If Murphy's Law can go wrong .. | Thu Mar 05 1987 17:24 | 10 |
| Not too bad. 10 dollars 21 years ago (not in constant dollars) would
result in $3060 today (18 shares @$170). That's about 31.33% per year
(compounded annually).
Though an investment in the employee stock plan makes more than that
(15% ROI on 13.5 weeks since its payroll deducted, twice a year, is
about 60% interest even with the $0.25 per share selling cost) even if
the stock doesn't rise and you sell immediately.
That investment is limited though.
|
75.21 | >No-no, go UP...UP! | DEC25::BRUNO | An Innocent Man | Fri Dec 15 1989 12:14 | 3 |
| Down five points in two days...argh...
|
75.22 | It's my fault. I'll get right on it. | CGOA01::DTHOMPSON | Don, of Don's ACT | Fri Dec 15 1989 13:17 | 13 |
| Dear DEC25::BRUNO:
Don't worry. The stock is just doing a standard 'before-I-sell'
dip which will bottom out the day I put in the sell order so I can
pay off some debts. It'll be over 100 within ten days of that sale.
Don
(BTW I, personally, ended the oil-crunch, high-gas prices and OPEC's
solidarity by buying oil stocks when they were high, so I know whereof
I speak.)
|
75.23 | I meant *selling* :-) | CUPCSG::SMITH | Passionate commitment to reasoned faith | Fri Dec 15 1989 14:46 | 4 |
| re:.22
Do you take requests from others as to when you do your buying????
:-)
|
75.24 | What's the difference? | LCDR::REITER | I'm the NRA | Fri Dec 15 1989 15:10 | 10 |
|
Filene's puts coats on sale,
Star Markets puts tuna on sale,
Wall Street puts DEC Common on sale!
:7) actually :7(
|
75.25 | I've heard that low prices make it harder for us to raise money. | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Fri Dec 15 1989 15:35 | 7 |
| RE: .24 When tuna and coats go on sale it saves me money. When
DEC common goes on sale it costs me money. Though I guess if I
was in a position to buy stock I'd feel different. But it's been
a while since my last raise and I'm not in a position to buy as I'm
trying to raise money not get rid of it.
Alfred
|
75.26 | | BOOKIE::MURRAY | Chuck Murray | Fri Dec 15 1989 18:20 | 19 |
| Re .25 and others: Well, I'm not in a position to do any stock
buying either; but if I were, DEC would be a good deal now.
I suspect that a lot of the recent downward pressure on DEC and
other high-tech stocks results from year-end "tax selling."
That is, investors look for losses to offset their capital gains;
lots of tax advisors say to sell your "poor performers," and
DEC's stock price surely qualifies it as that. Also, there's
apparently an expectation among many investors that next year
the capital gains tax rate will be lower -- thus making any loss that
can offset this year's capital gains (taxed at what is expected
to be a higher rate than next year's) more "valuable," thus adding
further pressure on stocks currently in the Wall Street dog house.
And finally, there's the old "window dressing" factor: Around the
end of each quarter and especially at the end of the year, mutual
fund managers tend to unload "dogs" and buy stocks that have been
"hot" -- so that when the quarterly and yearly reports of the
fund holdings are published, they appear to be expert stock pickers.
|
75.27 | Does Wall Street read these notes files?? | AUSTIN::UNLAND | Sic Biscuitus Disintegratum | Sat Dec 16 1989 03:31 | 10 |
| I'd wondered if this drop had something to do with the Stockholder's
plan passed by the Board earlier this week. Considering how many
of today's Wall Street stock analyses turn into self-fulfilling
prophecies, I had also wondered if some analyst had torpedoed us.
I guess if I really knew the answer, I wouldn't have to slave over
a hot terminal all day ... :-)
Geoff
|
75.28 | our image vis-a-vis Wall St. | SETH::CHERSON | maintain an even strain | Sun Dec 17 1989 17:15 | 7 |
| Funny (or not so funny) how much influence Wall St. has over people.
My friends and aquaintences are all asking me why DEC is doing so
poorly. I answer them with an astounded "WHAT?!?" look on my face. I
wish that the general public were a bit more educated to other economic
indicators outside of Wall St.
--David
|
75.29 | DEC /= Digital Equipment Corporation | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Mon Dec 18 1989 09:18 | 14 |
| re: .28
When people talk to me as though the fortunes of Digital Equipment
Corporation were related to the price of DEC stock, I tell them that
the only relationship between the company and the stock is a
coincidence of names. Unless the company liquidates (which is unlikely
in the forseeable future) the price of the stock depends on the stock
market, which is driven primarily by psychological forces, not by
whether or not the company is doing well.
Think of it as a college and its football team. The performance of the
football team has very little to do with how well the college educates
its students.
John Sauter
|
75.30 | Are we on a rollercoaster or what? | CGVAX2::CONNELL | | Mon Dec 18 1989 11:01 | 5 |
| FWIW. As of 10:00 EST, we are back up to 82.125. Must have been a good
weekend.
Phil
|
75.31 | Amusing notice to employee shareholders... | CGOO01::DTHOMPSON | Don, of Don's ACT | Fri Jan 26 1990 12:05 | 16 |
| As promised in a previous note, which I can't find right now...
As, perhaps, the world's least lucky investor, I have always had the
honor of selling low and buying high. After all, someone has to.
My skill at this is so great that I consider myself a market indicator.
If I buy, a stock will drop. If I sell it will rise. Therefore,
as a service to my fellow Digits, I offer the following notice:
A 'forced' (by my Christmas bills) sale of most of my shares of
Digital took place Monday, January 22. As your daily paper shows,
the stock has risen since then. In keeping with my past performance,
it is likely that Digital shares will rise above the $90 mark within
30 days. I hope y'all do better than I.
Don
|
75.32 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Fri Jan 26 1990 18:43 | 1 |
| Hmmm. Let me know next time, and I'll consider buying your shares.
|
75.33 | Stock -4 on one trade | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | God is their co-pilot | Mon Feb 25 1991 13:17 | 14 |
| Follow-ups to SUBWAY::INVESTING please
Digital Equip (DEC) P-Alert: - 4 on 490,400
FEB 25 1991 1145
11:32 ET
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP
Last Trade NYSE: - 4 at 72 on 1 downtick
Trade vol: 23,700 = 5% ttl vol= 0.0% shrs out
Ttl blk vol: 146,200 = 30% ttl vol= 0.1% shrs out
Avg blk vol: 248,286 = 30% avg daily vol
Ttl vol: 490,400 = 59% avg daily vol
Avg daily vol: 836,394 / Prev day - 1/2 on 986,500
|
75.34 | can we have an English translation please? | CVG::THOMPSON | Semper Gumby | Mon Feb 25 1991 13:44 | 5 |
| Pardon my ignorance, but I don't understand any of the previous
note. Is it saying that the stock dropped $4 on one sale? How
big a sale? Why such a big drop? Should we care?
Alfred
|
75.35 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | God is their co-pilot | Mon Feb 25 1991 13:49 | 5 |
| In transactions today to 11:30AM on the New York Stock Exchange the
market values of Digital Equipment Corporation Common Stock lost 5.5%.
Such a sharp drop triggers a price alert to the subscribers of Dow
Jones Professional Investor Report.
|
75.36 | | MU::PORTER | moping | Mon Feb 25 1991 17:58 | 9 |
| Uh, you'll have to speak gently to us engineering types.
What does "in transactions today ... lost 5.5%" mean?
Does it mean that the selling price at the end of some given
period was 5.5% lower than at the beginning of the period?
(It's that "in transactions" part that bothers me - it sounds
like it could have a technical meaning.)
|
75.37 | Wht's behind the big drop? | 501CLB::GILLEY | Kids are great, have another. | Wed Dec 18 1991 11:41 | 6 |
| Could someone post why Digital stock is DOWN 5 1/4 - according to my
stock.exe program?
I don't own stock, but, I want to continue working for Digital.
Charlie
|
75.38 | funny I had heard we were going to have a decent one | GIAMEM::MIOLA | Phantom | Wed Dec 18 1991 13:07 | 17 |
| re -1
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION ANNOUNCES PROBABLE
OPERATING LOSS FOR QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER 28, 1991
Received a memo with the above heading......
Guess I can't publish it here, or I will get fifty lashes with a wet
noodle :-).....
Lou
|
75.39 | VTX LIVE WIRE | JOKUR::JOKUR::BOICE | When in doubt, do it. | Wed Dec 18 1991 13:17 | 20 |
| From VTX LIVEWIRE: 18-Dec-1991
Digital announces probable operating loss for second quarter
(ending December 28, 1991)
Digital today announced that preliminary indications for the quarter ending
December 28, 1991 point to a probable loss from operations due principally
to reduced customer demand for larger computer systems resulting from weak
worldwide economic conditions as well as competitive pressures. In
addition, as previously noted, several recently announced products are not
yet shipping in significant volume due to normal volume manufacturing ramp
up. All products are expected to be fully available during the March quarter.
The company's services and software businesses, which are somewhat less
impacted by economic swings, continue to show growth and now account for
over 50% of the company's operating revenues as they have for the last
several quarters.
The company anticipates releasing its operating results for the quarter on
January 16, 1992.
|
75.40 | You heard it here first . . . | CAPNET::CROWTHER | Maxine 276-8226 | Thu Dec 19 1991 08:12 | 5 |
| Anyone happen to notice that this was published on LIVEWIRE as it was
being announced to Wall Street instead of several days later. Maybe
we actually heard this news before folks outside the company. Start
of a new trend . . .??
|
75.41 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Dec 19 1991 09:56 | 6 |
| re .40:
We'd better not be hearing it first -- that leads to insider trading.
We're safe -- I checked Livewire after reading the information in DOWVISION,
and it wasn't there yet.
|
75.42 | But no one told *me*... | GIAMEM::MUMFORD | Dick Mumford, DTN 244-7809 | Thu Dec 19 1991 10:00 | 10 |
| re: .40
The only difference is, the "street" is notified directly. There is no
internal system that I know of that says "quick, look in LIVEWIRE for a
major announcement that may cost you $$$". When we internal folk are
afforded the same level of visibility regarding the posting of such
information, then I'll view it as the start of a new trend.
I guess our only alternative is to check LIVEWIRE every few minutes for
late-breaking news stories.
|
75.43 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Dec 19 1991 11:14 | 7 |
| I'm no expert, but perhaps Patrick Sweeney can verify or refute my
understanding of this:
The story was announced before the stock market opened. Trading in DEC
was delayed because of an order imbalance (more people wanted to sell than
buy). Theoretically, there was no way for you to get a better price for
your stock even if you had real-time access to the information.
|
75.44 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Honey, I iconified the kids | Thu Dec 19 1991 11:41 | 26 |
| Yup.
Major planned announcements are always scheduled before or after
market opening or closing to allow the investor community to absorb
information.
Because the 8:30 AM announcement resulted in a large number of SELL
orders which were not balanced by BUY orders the market opening of
Digital was delayed.
As EMPLOYEES I know of no potential event that would require the
company to create a communications infratstructure that would allow
real-time notification.
As INVESTORS there are plenty of opportunities to obtain market
information, the most basic of which is the services of a stock broker,
either full-service or discount.
If a one-day decline of 10% in the common stock price of Digital has a
material effect on your personal wealth, I suggest that you diversify:
you already are "investing" your career here.
Digital is and will continue to be a volatile stock and unsuitable as a
single investment for a conservative investor.
More in SUBWAY::INVESTING
|
75.45 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Fri Dec 20 1991 08:44 | 9 |
| <<< Note 75.43 by NOTIME::SACKS "Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085" >>>
> Theoretically, there was no way for you to get a better price for
> your stock even if you had real-time access to the information.
Theoretically, you could choose to sell your shares in another exchange
(NYSE, Pacific, London, Hong Kong, etc.), or elect to sell them outside
of an exchange all together, that is, as a private sale.
- tom]
|
75.46 | LEARNING FROM THE PAST !?@#%^&? | ODIXIE::SUAZO | | Thu Mar 31 1994 10:29 | 5 |
| ISN'T THIS ALL IRRELEVANT WHEN YOU SEE WHAT DIGITALS STOCK PRICES ARE
TODAY. ITS NOT SO MUCH WHAT THE PRICE PER SHARE IS BUT THE FACT THAT
THIS COMPANY IS NOT EXPANDING. YOU MUST BE IN AN EXPANDING COMPANY TO
MOVE UP, OTHER WISE THE COMPANY IS EITHER LAYING OFF OR GETTING READY TO
GO OUT OF BUSINES.
|
75.47 | | DPDMAI::EYSTER | IM4U, {*} RU4ME? | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:12 | 1 |
| Stop shouting, please, I hear you!
|
75.48 | It's just not worth it. | DEMON::PILGRM::BAHN | Possibility of IDIC | Thu Mar 31 1994 19:53 | 6 |
|
>>> Stop shouting, please, I hear you!
Yes, please do ... and, if you really feel that intensely
about it, please try to relax. You might hurt youself.
|
75.49 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Fri Apr 01 1994 03:33 | 6 |
| RE: .46 by ODIXIE::SUAZO
>THE COMPANY IS EITHER LAYING OFF OR GETTING READY TO GO OUT OF BUSINES.
or both...
|