T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
325.1 | [ 1 ] Please count me in.. | PIGGY::MCCALLION | | Tue Dec 13 1988 19:55 | 5 |
| Please post here or send vaxmail to me. I have not belonged to
NOW for many years. I would be interested in making the DC trip.
Thnks,
marie
|
325.3 | March date: April 9 1989 | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Fri Jan 13 1989 14:04 | 24 |
| I just got more info about this march in the Acton Area NOW newsletter.
The announcement is reproduced below:
March for Women's Equality, Women's Lives
April 9, 1989, Washington D.C.
All NOW members and friends are called to join a March in Washington
D.C. April 9, when the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to be considering
the first major attack underr the Bush Administration on Roe v Wade,
the 1973 decision which affirmed every woman's right to decide when and
whether to bear children.
National NOW President Molly Yard is asking for half a million marchers
to let the new President, Congress and the Supreme Court know in no
uncertain terms that "there aren't enough jails in America to hold the
women who will defy this assault on individual liberty if Roe is
reversed."
Busloads will go from Boston and a group from our area [Action MA]
will fly. Save the date and call 508-264-4NOW if you can make it
for the weekend or day.
|
325.4 | [ 3 ] I'm in. | MOSAIC::TARBET | | Fri Jan 13 1989 14:31 | 6 |
| Wouldn't it be swell if we could get a few busloads from our =wn=
community?
I'll be on the first one. Who else?
=maggie
|
325.5 | [ 4 ] so, do I get a window seat? | RAINBO::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Fri Jan 13 1989 14:40 | 1 |
| I'd be on the bus.
|
325.7 | [ 5 ] it's time for antoher trip to DC | PSYCHE::SULLIVAN | | Fri Jan 13 1989 16:11 | 4 |
|
I plan to go, too.
Justine
|
325.8 | | EVER11::KRUPINSKI | Thank you for using VAXnotes | Fri Jan 13 1989 16:27 | 14 |
| re .3
> "there aren't enough jails in America to hold the women who will
> defy this assault on individual liberty if Roe is reversed."
1) Nice to know that NOW prefers mob rule to the rule of law.
2) Nice to know that NOW believes that many women hold themselves
above the law.
3) There aren't enough jails in America to hold all of the
drug criminals. I wonder if NOW is in favor of drugs, too.
Tom_K
|
325.9 | | AQUA::WAGMAN | QQSV | Fri Jan 13 1989 17:10 | 44 |
| Re: .8 re .3
Tom_K, I think you may have missed the point of .3 when she said
>> "there aren't enough jails in America to hold the women who will
>> defy this assault on individual liberty if Roe is reversed."
Let's look at your responses one by one:
> 1) Nice to know that NOW prefers mob rule to the rule of law.
Civil disobedience is a time honored way of calling attention to an injustice--
witness the civil rights demonstrations of the 60's. When one disobeys a law
one can expect to go to jail, and .3's concern could, I suppose, come to pass
if we do, in fact, make abortion a crime punishable by imprisonment. However,
getting an abortion is hardly an act of mob violence (whether you support
legal abortion or not). I see no evidence in .3 that NOW was calling for any
sort of mob rule.
> 2) Nice to know that NOW believes that many women hold themselves
> above the law.
Sounds to me like the exact opposite of .3. She suggests that women go to
jail in protest of a Roe v. Wade overturn. Going to jail is consistent with
the law, which would (or might) dictate a jail penalty for abortion (or for
protesting the illegality of it). If .3 had said that women should protest
and resist arrest, then your suggestion that they hold themselves above the
law might be valid. But being prepared to go to jail in protest isn't above
the law at all.
Thus, your
> 3) There aren't enough jails in America to hold all of the
> drug criminals. I wonder if NOW is in favor of drugs, too.
seems to me to be irrelevant to the issue at hand. I realize that it is a
very emotional issue, and one on which you seem to be in the minority in this
file. I've been pleased that you haven't been intimidated by the amount of
opposition you've encountered here up to now. I hope that we can keep the
discussion centered on abortion, though. Drugs may well be a serious problem
in this country. But they really don't have much to do with pro choice
demonstrations.
--Q (Dick Wagman)
|
325.10 | Moderator Request | MOSAIC::TARBET | | Fri Jan 13 1989 17:32 | 5 |
| And now that there is a paired protest/response, will everyone please
take further argument about abortion to the appropriate topic and
reserve this one for march issues as such. Thanks.
=maggie
|
325.11 | warmup rallies | TOOK::HEFFERNAN | Night after night- the moon! | Sun Jan 15 1989 17:10 | 7 |
| There will be a prochoice demonstratiopns on Saturday, 21 January in
Boston at Park Square, Kenmore Square, Coolidge Corner, and Cleveland
Circle from 9 AM to 12 Noon.
john
|
325.12 | I'm for a wn march | 2EASY::PIKET | | Wed Jan 18 1989 12:06 | 9 |
|
I would like to join the bus to D.C. Maybe we could even have a
wn banner! :^)
Seriously, count me in.
Roberta
|
325.13 | [ 6 ] One more | SALEM::LUPACCHINO | There's a world beyond this room. | Wed Jan 18 1989 14:29 | 4 |
|
I'll be in Boston on Sat. and DC in April.
am
|
325.14 | who's running this one | TALLIS::ROBBINS | | Wed Jan 18 1989 16:32 | 17 |
| Re < Note 325.11 by TOOK::HEFFERNAN "Night after night- the moon!" >
-< warmup rallies >-
There will be a prochoice demonstratiopns on Saturday, 21 January in
Boston at Park Square, Kenmore Square, Coolidge Corner, and Cleveland
Circle from 9 AM to 12 Noon.
john
---------------------------------------------------
Are you sure about this demonstration
I called MassChoice to ask about it, and they had no
knowledge of it.
Thanks.
--Debbie
|
325.15 | | TOOK::HEFFERNAN | Night after night- the moon! | Wed Jan 18 1989 20:38 | 10 |
| RE: .-1
Well, I read it on a number of signs in Cambridge last weekend. I
think NOW was mentioned on the sign. Perhaps someone who lives in
Cambridge or Boston can check the posters. I hope I did not get the
date wrong.
john
|
325.16 | According to Boston NOW: | SALEM::LUPACCHINO | There's a world beyond this room. | Thu Jan 19 1989 16:46 | 11 |
|
Re: .11
There *is* a pro-choice rally on Saturday from 9-11 at the locations
mentioned in .11. (sponsored by NOW)
There is another rally the following day at Fanueil Hall, Boston
from 12-1p.m. while Cardinal Law addresses pro-life activists.
(sponsored by Bill Baird)
Ann Marie
|
325.17 | me too | VIA::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Thu Jan 19 1989 19:26 | 1 |
| I'll be there.
|
325.18 | TEXT OF POSTER | TOOK::HEFFERNAN | Night after night- the moon! | Thu Jan 19 1989 22:12 | 58 |
| Yes, I was down in Central Square and rechecked the poster.
The text is:
January 22, 1973 - January 22, 1989
16 YEARS OF SAFE AND LEGAL ABORTION: DON'T LET THIS BE THE LAST!
Roe Vs Wade, the decision which legalized abortion, is in jeopardy.
At the urging of the Reagan-Bush Administration, the US Supreme Court
will review a Missouri anti-abortion law this spring. The Court could
decide to uphold sections of the law severely restricting a women's
access to abortion and further eroding a women's right to choose. Or,
the Supreme Court could repeal Roe Vs Wade, removing any
constitutional protections for abortion rights.
EITHER WAY WOMEN LOSE. WE HAVE ALREADY LOST TOO MUCH.
Poor women are denied abortion rights: Congress passed the Hyde
Amendment, prohibiting the use of federal Medacaid funds for abortions
in 1977. In 1988, Congress refused to allow abortion funding in cases
of rape or incest.
Young women are denied abortion rights: Massachusetts in 1977 became
the first state to require minors seeking abortions to have consent of
their parents or a judge; this, and other restrictions, have been
upheld by the Supreme Court and lower courts.
All womens's abortion rights are threatened - by the courts, by the
legistrture, and also by right wing extermists.
The anti-abortionists have stepped up their efforts to deny women the
right to choose. Pickets, harassment, clinic vandalism and bombings
put all women seeking abortion and familily planing at risk.
"Operation Rescue" is the latest attack by the anti-abortion movement;
their goal is to intimidate - to force clinics to shut down, denying
women needed services. These attacks on abortion threaten women's
lives.
JOIN THE FIGHT FOR ABORTION RIGHTS: WE MUST SHOW MASSACHUSETTS AND
THE NATION THATR THE PRO-CHOICE MOVEMENT WILL NOT BE TURNED BACK!
Saturday, January 21, 9-11 AM - demonstrate near clinics throughout
the Boston Area. Join us at Park Street Station, Kenmore Square,
Coolidge Corner, and Cleveland Circle.
Sunday, January 22 - commenorate the anniversity of Roe Vs Wade with a
community meeting to plan future strategies. UMASS, 100 Arlington
Street, Boston, 1-5 PM.
Sunday, April 9, Washington, DC. Join the National March for Women's
Equality and Women's Lives - and take our call for equality and
abortion rights to the nation's capitol.
Sponsored by the Committee for Reproductive Freedom (Alliance Against
Women's Oppression, Boston NOW, and Boston Reproductive Rights
Network). For more information, call NOW at 782-1056.
|
325.19 | Could you put your number in your title when you commit? | RAINBO::TARBET | | Fri Jan 20 1989 08:51 | 4 |
| How many seats on a bus? If I've counted correctly, we've filled 7
of them so far.
=maggie
|
325.20 | thanks | TALLIS::ROBBINS | | Fri Jan 20 1989 09:44 | 8 |
| Re: .18
Thanks for typing that in!
I'll be there Saturday! (They're predicting a high temp. of 20
degrees, and a wind chill of 0. Brrrr.)
-Debbie
|
325.21 | [ 7 ] Let's Do It. | USEM::DONOVAN | | Fri Jan 20 1989 11:06 | 7 |
| Since I started this string, I guess I should get up of by #ss
and take a stand. I'm #8 if we get the bus. If not, I will go with
the group from Worcester. I have the name of our local NOW rep.
In Unity there is strength!
Kate
|
325.22 | Is there a plane to DC April 9? | TUT::LEACH | | Tue Jan 24 1989 12:05 | 16 |
| Heard that Worcester might organize a plane flight to Washington.
I'd be interested. Has anyone heard about this?
FYI:
To find out, I called Boston. They gave me phone for Nancy Irons,
Worcester representative for NOW: 508-755-9564. No answer during
the day, so I'll try her at night. Will let you know what I learn.
Boston doesn't think any definite plans will be made for a while,
however.
Boston also gave me the national headquarters number: 202-331-0066.
Ann Leach
|
325.23 | I'm surprised by the lack of response | RAINBO::TARBET | | Tue Jan 24 1989 13:25 | 11 |
| Speaking of airplanes, flying down and back would be a great deal
quicker/more comfortable than a bus. My understanding is that shuttle
fare is ca. $150 each way, *substantially* less if we could fill
a plane.
Are there really only 7 of us (well, 8 with Barbara who's travelling
on her own but wants to meet us there) willing to go? Are the Reagan/
Bush folks right about women being either apathetic or actually
opposed?
=maggie
|
325.24 | other reasons | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Tue Jan 24 1989 13:35 | 4 |
| Speaking for this woman, neither appathetic or opposed...just
can't afford the $$.
Bonnie
|
325.25 | how about car pools? | MOSAIC::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Tue Jan 24 1989 14:17 | 6 |
| Since many women (as a group) tend to lack disposable income, how about
organizing car pools? The last time I went to a march in Washington,
four of us rented a big comfortable car and brought lots of snack foods.
Distributing the cost that way made it pretty affordable. One hotel room
split 4 ways also comes out fairly reasonably. Maybe this note can be
used for that kind of networking, too?
|
325.26 | another kind of contribution... | MOSAIC::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Tue Jan 24 1989 14:20 | 5 |
| and another idea...
since many women are also primary caretakers for small children, maybe
folks who aren't able to go but who would like to contribute might want
to consider offering babysitting services for those who do want to go...
|
325.27 | | RAINBO::TARBET | | Tue Jan 24 1989 14:49 | 8 |
| *Nice* ideas, Catherine! How long does it take to drive to DC?
Is cost the major factor for most of our community? (It isn't for me,
but this is the first time in my life that it hasn't been so it
wouldn't surprise me to hear that that's where the silence is coming
from)
=maggie
|
325.28 | I can't make it, but have a good excuse! | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Tue Jan 24 1989 15:11 | 3 |
| April 9th is my sister-in-law's wedding day!
With you in spirit - /Charlotte
|
325.29 | | WAGON::MATHERS | | Tue Jan 24 1989 15:12 | 10 |
| I am very interested in going, but I would have
to find out the total cost and really plan for
it. A plane sounds a lot better for comfort reasons.
I think it would be about 10 hours to drive...anyone
have a better time estimate?
If I went down separately with some other friends, how
could I meet other fellow womannoters?
Barb
|
325.31 | driving info | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Tue Jan 24 1989 15:26 | 5 |
| washington is about 480 miles from the Greater Maynard Area. when
i drive down there (not terribly often), i allow a day for each
direction.
liz
|
325.32 | time enroute | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Tue Jan 24 1989 15:28 | 5 |
| Having driven the route many many times to visit my folks, I'd put
it between 8 to 10 hours, depending on where you are leaving from
and how long you stop on the way.
Bonnie
|
325.33 | me too | BUSY::WOLOCHOWICZ | NANCE | Tue Jan 24 1989 16:07 | 3 |
| Count me in. I'd prefer to fly down.
nmw
|
325.35 | remote-tee's | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | pursuing *my* path of vision quest | Tue Jan 24 1989 19:20 | 15 |
|
re .30 Mike
You're right, the carpool would be difficult for those of us at
remote sites ;-), but while we continue to discuss this in and out
of =wn='s maybe we can find some 'network roommates' so that *staying*
in D.C. can be more affordable. It is still early enough to find
some real reasonable air fares.
Also, others interested may find out whether or not their local
chapter of NOW has organized transportation from their area.
~robin (one of the thousand from S.C. :-))
|
325.36 | want to go | HACKIN::MACKIN | Men for Parthenogenesis | Tue Jan 24 1989 20:15 | 8 |
| I'd like to go and am, in the back of my mind, planning
on going. If there are no other males (from =wn community
going), I'll probably drive down and use Delaware as a stopover
point. Which, if there were a few (two-three max) I could probably
scrounge up a friend's place where we could stay over.
8 hours to drive? Bonnie, I'd love to find your directions as I can't
even get to the Delaware Memorial Bridge in under 7 hours.
|
325.38 | I would like to go | COGMK::POIRIER | Aerobicize for Life! | Wed Jan 25 1989 09:56 | 4 |
| I would like to attend - but again, like others, I need to get a
rough estimate of cost so I can try to fit it into my budget.
Suzanne
|
325.40 | | USMFG::PJEFFRIES | the best is better | Wed Jan 25 1989 12:11 | 4 |
|
re..24
ditto
|
325.41 | silver lining... | ULTRA::ZURKO | Words like winter snowflakes | Wed Jan 25 1989 13:36 | 3 |
| You know, every time the abortion topic heats up, I get inspired. I'm
tentative, depending on working out details.
Mez
|
325.42 | Boston suburbs to DC = 9 hours | AQUA::WAGMAN | QQSV | Wed Jan 25 1989 14:18 | 15 |
| RE: .36
> 8 hours to drive? Bonnie, I'd love to find your directions as I can't
> even get to the Delaware Memorial Bridge in under 7 hours.
I've driven from Acton MA to the northwest DC suburbs in about nine hours
driving time (pit and meal stops extra). You should be able to manage to
do it that quickly unless (a) you really never go faster than 55, or (b)
you spend a lot of time stopping en route.
There have been a number of discussions about driving from the Boston suburbs
to the New York City area in 3D::SHORT_CUTS (hit KP7 or SELECT). If you have
more route questions you could get them answered there.
--Q
|
325.43 | tentative | CIVIC::JOHNSTON | OK, _why_ is it illegal? | Wed Jan 25 1989 14:23 | 5 |
| Money has been a gating factor for me on this trip. However, if
I can find a place to toss my sleeping bag for smallish cash outlay
I would be more that happy to drive [my car, not a bus]
Ann
|
325.44 | me too | NAC::BENCE | Shetland Pony School of Problem Solving | Thu Jan 26 1989 11:13 | 5 |
|
Money's tight for me too, but I'll gladly drive or split driving
responsiblities and costs (and even the cost of a cheap hotel room).
cathy
|
325.45 | | CYRUS::DRISKELL | | Thu Jan 26 1989 18:26 | 8 |
| count me in also. I'll drive or fly. (have driven often to nj in
4.5 hrs, but i tend to 'fly') only thing is, don't let me navigate.
last time i drove to nj, i stoped at a rest area, got back on the
highway going the wrong way, and ended up touring the catskills.
total miles out of my way ? 52 Round trip. but i'd never seen the
catskills before!!
mary
|
325.46 | Letter campaign | AMUN::LEACH | | Fri Jan 27 1989 09:19 | 13 |
| In addition to going to the rally, I'm sending a letter to President
Bush. One letter may be a drop in the bucket, but hundreds of letters
really do get heard. You can add yours, if you like, by mailing
your views to:
President George Bush
The White House
Washington, DC 20500
I put my letter in Notes topic : Pro-Choice Letter Campaign
|
325.47 | Let's Orgsanise | USEM::DONOVAN | | Fri Jan 27 1989 11:18 | 13 |
| Listen up!! Great response! I love it.
It seems lots of people want to drive down. If you do, send me mail.
Also, include whether your car is available and how many it will
fit.Also, include where you live. I will handle the logistics.
Will anyone volunteer for getting hotel arrangements squared away? What
else do we need?
In Unity There is Strength!
Kate
|
325.48 | Me too! | TSG::DOUGHERTY | | Fri Jan 27 1989 12:59 | 6 |
|
Don't know how, but, I'm going too!
Another (EX)Catholic for choice,
Mary
|
325.49 | I prefer an aisle seat, please... | HAMSTR::IRLBACHER | Another I is beginning... | Fri Jan 27 1989 13:22 | 9 |
| I am a NOW member who certainly intends to dig out the ole
sneakers.
Can I get a seat on that bus with the rest of you, please?
I don't want to have to march all the way to DC!
I kinda like the idea of a =wm= banner.
Marilyn
|
325.50 | I'll be there!! | NECVAX::CERRETA | | Fri Jan 27 1989 15:46 | 10 |
| I'll be going as well. I'll be driving down with a non-DECie and
will be staying with friends in Philadelphia.
I'm glad we've had some decent response in this note. I have never
been as emotionally absorbed in a political issue as I am in this.
We need to unite.
I hope to lots of womannoters there. I'll be looking for you!
Gail
|
325.51 | MA to TX: That's worse than MA to DC | USCTR1::RMCCAFFREY | Love, Loyalty and Friendship | Mon Jan 30 1989 12:02 | 15 |
|
If I were going to be around, I'd seriously consider going.
I'd have to check the regs because there might be something against
public demonstrations....however, I think that since, technically,
I wouldn't be demonstrating AGAINST anything (I'd be demonstrating
for Roe vs. Wade) that I'd be OK. Anyway, the point is moot because
I have orders and on 9 April, I will be "Deep in the Heart of Texas".
I did, however, want to lend my support to the mement. I'll
be with you in spirit as I try to avoid dangerous snakes and loud
men in cowboy hats.
GO IRISH!
Rachel
|
325.52 | hotel rates in DC | BPOV02::MACKINNON | | Mon Jan 30 1989 14:52 | 9 |
|
I just got a phone number in Washington.
It is for the Washington DC Convention and Visitors Association.
The number is (202)789-7000.
They are sending me out info on hotels in the area. When I recieve
the info I will post rates and such in this note.
Michele
|
325.53 | Anyone from Merrimack/Nashua? | FENNEL::VEILLEUX | if you choose not to decide... | Tue Jan 31 1989 08:44 | 6 |
| I'd like to go too - anyone else from the Merrimack/Nashua, NH area
planning to go? Maybe we could carpool from here to meet up with
the carpools/bus in MA?
...Lisa V...
|
325.54 | Count me in at any cost... | OMKAR::SANKAR | Arundhati Sankar | Tue Jan 31 1989 10:40 | 11 |
| I would like to go to Washington for the March.
If there is a charted flight, count me in..
If there is a charted bus, count me in..
If some wants to share expense, count me in..
If some wants to ride with me, let me know...
In short I will be there, and prefer to go
with a group, at any cost...
Arun Sankar.
|
325.55 | I want to go... | COGMK::POIRIER | Aerobicize for Life! | Tue Jan 31 1989 10:47 | 6 |
| RE: 53
I hope to be going and I live in Merrimack...perhaps we could get
together and car pool!
Suzanne
|
325.56 | my car hold four... | CIVIC::JOHNSTON | OK, _why_ is it illegal? | Tue Jan 31 1989 11:26 | 10 |
| re.53 & 55:
Lisa & Suzanne,
I live in Nashua, work in Merrimack. In .43 I offered to drive
if a find a place to stay [I've had an offer].
Should we take this 'off-line'?
Ann
|
325.57 | Send Me Mail | USEM::DONOVAN | | Tue Jan 31 1989 12:51 | 15 |
| I am still collecting names for those interested in carpooling.
For those who don't have anyone to go with, I'll be back in touch
(off line) by the end of the week.
I got a call from Robin from S.C. who said the National Airport
Holiday Inn is renting rooms which can fit 5 people for $59 per
night. Although there is only one bed, people could do the inflat-
able matress routine.
There is a 1-800 Holiday Inn number. I will call Feb 9th with the
head count. It would be nice if we could all be together on the
same floor. Send mail if you need a place to stay.
Kate
|
325.58 | Moderator Response | RAINBO::TARBET | | Wed Feb 01 1989 12:28 | 41 |
|
A very respected member of our community has urged that the file not
be used to plan march participation. This person is very firmly
pro-choice, but makes two points: (a) it is against DEC policy to
solicit support for a political cause and (b) that since there are
at least some valued members of the community who are not pro-
choice, to publicly work out the details of a pro-choice event
borders on gratuitous insult and may have the effect of making those
women feel unwelcome in the file.
These points are good ones. It's all too easy to get caught up in
the spirit of the moment and forget that the majority position is
not the only one, and that there are indeed *very* valued members of
our =wn= community who are just as strongly opposed to the goal of
this march as others are in favor. Moreover, if anyone were to urge
someone else's participation in this event that would indeed be a
violation of DEC policy on computer use!
Therefore, the moderators would like to remind everyone that while
it is legitimate to report our personal intentions concerning
participation/non-participation and to make plans with other people
who are similarly inclined, it is *NOT* legitimate to urge action or
inaction on anyone else except in the hypothetical context of
argument in the appropriate strings. Any notes violating this
principle will be immediately hidden with a request sent to their
authors requesting rewrite or deletion.
The moderators would also like to remind everyone that this file is
intended to be a supportive place for *all* women at DEC, of
whatever political, social, or sexual orientation...and particularly
of women whose views, orientation or status tend to place them in a
minority within our community. Thus, for a contextual example, if
other members of our community should wish to plan participation in
a demonstration opposed to this march, the moderators will support
any strings dedicated to that planning and, so that the activity can
be carried out in peace, will immediately move, hide, or delete any
notes that tend to disrupt the process.
in Sisterhood,
Ann Marie, Bonnie, Jody, Liz,
=maggie, and Mez
|
325.59 | Moderator Response | RAINBO::TARBET | | Thu Feb 02 1989 10:03 | 5 |
| Please be aware that this string is NOT closed, it was and is still
open and available for planning activities in connection with the
April march.
=maggie
|
325.60 | Thanks | TUT::SMITH | Passionate commitment to reasoned faith | Thu Feb 02 1989 11:06 | 2 |
| Thanks for this note -- I had gotten the impression that the whole
planning string was illegal (per DEC policy)
|
325.61 | | RAINBO::TARBET | | Thu Feb 02 1989 11:24 | 6 |
| No, *soliciting* for a political (i.e., controversial) purpose is
against policy, but merely talking about our own personal plans
and coordinating with other people who have similar plans is just
fine.
=maggie
|
325.62 | | MARRHQ::SANTSCHI | | Thu Feb 02 1989 17:10 | 16 |
| -< Wouldn't It Be Nice... >-
...if all of us DEC women and friends met on Saturday, April 8th
for an outdoor picnic gathering on the Mall in DC? Weather permitting
of course!
I live near DC and work in the Landover, MD office and could scout
out a good place to meet, near a landmark. I think it would be
great to see how many DEC women we can gather together in one place.
Let me know what you all think!
Looking forward to the weekend,
Sue
|
325.63 | On bringing children to the march | VAXWRK::TURNER | Larry Turner | Thu Feb 02 1989 19:41 | 12 |
|
I have two children (7,8�), and am thinking about going. I'm torn between
the camaraderie of a bus and the comfort of a car. I'm also concerned
about expenses and where to stay. Are others going with children? Is
anyone taking any children on a bus leaving from anywhere near Marlborough,
and what are the bus arrangements?
Thanks,
Larry
|
325.64 | | RUTLND::SAISI | | Fri Feb 03 1989 11:56 | 6 |
| I want to go and have someone else who also does, so that is 2 more
people for the bus. Couldn't we have the bus drive home that night,
and catch what sleep we can on the way? That would save some money.
Is an overnight planned for the night *before* the march? This
sounds exciting.
Linda
|
325.65 | | RAINBO::TARBET | | Fri Feb 03 1989 12:45 | 40 |
|
It looks to me as though we have 4 possible groups here:
- those who want to go by plane for speed
- those who want to go by bus for community
- those who want to go by car for cost
- and of course those who are planning to make
their own way down and rv with the rest of us once there
As far as I can tell at this point, the main sentiment appears to favor
a convoy of cars rather than a bus, particularly. This solution will
work very well if we have sufficient new-ish cars, and we can borrow a
number of CB radios so as to keep in contact en route.
Kate Donovan (USEM::DONOVAN, see .47) has taken responsibility for
sorting out a list of who's going and what means are most favored. She
has asked for information, and it would probably be a good idea for
everyone to send her mail giving
- your transportation preferences in order, including any that
are right out of the question unless <whatever>
- where you live (so that pickup arrangements can be optimised)
- your ability to share energy (can you drive a car? a bus?
navigate well?), costs (chip in for gas? for bus rental?
food & drink? room rental?) and hardware (year/make of car?
how many seats? do you have access to a cb radio?)
- any strange preferences for company (e.g., I really like folk
music and hate rock but most people are just the opposite,
plus I'm a mostly-veggie and really love spicy asian food)
If we all do that, perhaps Kate would commit to posting a update
every day so that we know where we stand and can make tradeoffs.
=maggie
|
325.66 | two more for the road | METOO::LEEDBERG | Render Unto Peaches | Sat Feb 04 1989 12:51 | 15 |
|
My daughter and I want to go to DC - we live in N. Chelmsford
MA and will need to have someone travel with us to share the
driving and expenses. I have a friend who lives just outside
of DC who we might be able to stay with.
_peggy & Greta (who doesn't work for DEC, Yet.)
(-)
|
Sorry it took me so long to reply to
this.
|
325.67 | me too | SA1794::KELLYB | | Mon Feb 06 1989 10:42 | 11 |
| Kate, Count me in. We can drive or bus or fly.
Can I help with the details??
Sue, The 8th sounds great.
The drive to DC from SPO has taken me 6 HRS at most in the past.
That's with rest stops. More then one driver. ect..
Probaly 4 people to a hotel room, split the cost 4 ways can not
beat it.
|
325.68 | Acton NOW to discuss ways to get there | TUT::LEACH | | Mon Feb 06 1989 15:14 | 25 |
| I'm going to the NOW meeting in Acton on Feb 8, where I understand
they'll be discussing the march and ways to get there. This is
to include flying (my preference).
Maybe others would like to attend the meeting. In any case, I'll
take notes and let you know what I learn.
Meeting details:
Feb 8, 8 pm (coffee at 7:30)
McCarthy-Towne School Library
Routes 111 and 27, Acton
Directions:
From Rte 495, take 2A to Rte 27. Turn right at Rte 27. Go
through two sets of lights to Rte 111, turn right. School district
building are just a short way on the right. Turn right into drive.
Go to the top of the hill and park. Entrance is in the back of
the library.
Ann
|
325.69 | | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Mon Feb 06 1989 17:10 | 6 |
| does anyone know what time on sunday the march starts? i ask because
i've been invited to an event the night before and am wondering
if i can squeeze both in.
thanks
liz
|
325.70 | | LYRIC::QUIRIY | | Mon Feb 06 1989 18:07 | 8 |
|
I plan to go, but don't know much else right now. A few (or maybe
more) notes back a DC area writer suggested a meeting spot (and
time?) for DECcies coming to march. I, for one, would love that
since I'd like to have the opportunity to find other DECcies even
if I happen to not travel with some!
CQ
|
325.71 | Better directions to meeting | AQUA::WAGMAN | QQSV | Mon Feb 06 1989 19:01 | 21 |
| Re: .68
> -< Acton NOW to discuss ways to get there >-
>
> Meeting details:
>
> Feb 8, 8 pm (coffee at 7:30)
> McCarthy-Towne School Library
> Routes 111 and 27, Acton
Even easier (and quicker) Directions:
From I-495 take Rt 2 east towards Acton and Boston for two exits to Rt 27
(Acton/Maynard). Get off at Rt 27 and turn right (towards Maynard); proceed
for about 1/4 mile to Rt 111 (the first traffic light). Then...
> ... turn right. School district buildings are just a short way on
> the right. Turn right into drive. Go to the top of the hill and park.
> Entrance is in the back of the library.
--Q (Dick Wagman)
|
325.72 | 2 more | CURIE::ROCCO | | Tue Feb 07 1989 11:31 | 9 |
| My husband Greg and I are interested in going. I think I prefer flying, but we
would also be willing to take the bus. I unfortunately can't make it to the
NOW meeting in Acton, but am looking forward to reading the notes from the
meeting.
Thanks,
Muggsie
|
325.73 | one more | CTCADM::TURAJ | | Wed Feb 08 1989 16:53 | 3 |
| I'm interested in going.
Jenny
|
325.74 | Buses, planes, hotel for April 9 march | MUMMY::LEACH | | Thu Feb 09 1989 17:20 | 120 |
| Here's the word on transportation to the April 9 march. Also hotel
accommodations. This is a long note!
BUSES:
Buses will leave Boston Saturday evening. $40 per person, round
trip (subsidies available). Call the March Hot Line for information
and alternative trasportation: (617)782-4059 TDD (617)787-4393.
For information on buses leaving local areas, call the above numbers
or the Acton phone: 508-264-4NOW.
If you want to take the bus, print out the following form, and send
it with your check to :
Boston NOW
971 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
Make check payable to Massachusetts NOW
__ I want to join the historic march
__ I will stay for Monday Lobby Day
__I want to help work on the march
__ I am enclosing $_____for_____bus tickets
__ I would like to contribute $___________
Name____________________________________________________________
Address_________________________________________________________
City____________________________State____________Zip____________
Telephone(________)________________________________
FOR PLANES AND HOTELS:
Soon, there will be information on charter flights. For now, here
is information on commercial flights through NOW.
NOW has arranged for discounted flights through United Airlines.
Individuals wishing to take advantage of these special rates must
make their reservations through a central agency in Washington DC.
These discounted rates will not be available through local travel
agents, as far as NOW is aware.
As of FRIDAY, FEB 10, reservations may be made via telephone to:
G.E.T. Meeting Planner, tel 1-800-228-0861
Their operating hours are M-F, 9 am - 5 pm
There are two discounted rates available for flights:
1. 5% discount off restricted airfares, such as Ultra or Super Savers.
Restrictions applying may be such things as a 25% penalty for cancelled
reservations, or limited fligh availability or scheudles.
2. 40% discount off unrestricted, full coach fares.
At this junture, NOW cannot predict which of these two options is
the better bet. The latest figure for the super save round-trip
fare from Logan is $160. From Bradley, the quote is $112. Also,
there is no gurarantee that the Untied prices, even at discount,
are the best available. You might cnsider contacting G.E.T. for
a quote and then comparing their prices with other airlines. Check
with local travel agents for this info.
To qualify for the G.E.T. discount, identify yourself and/or your
group as aprticipants in the April 9th march.
TRAINS:
No arrangements have been made through NOW for trains to Washington.
However, AMtrak does have regular service to DC, originating in
Boston. Last cost quoted was approximately $105 round-trip. The
trip takes around 8 hours, and tickets may be purchased through
local travel agents or at South Station, where the trains originate.
ACCOMMODATIONS:
Recommendation: MAKE THESE EARLY!
G.E.T. Meeting Planners are also handling hotel arrangements, starting
February 10. Reservations, however, must be made in writing on
special forms provided by G.E.T. Requests for these forms may be
made over the phone starting Friday the 10th. Send the completed
form to:
Ms. Vick Ferguson
G.E.T. Meeting Planners
1522 Conn. Ave., N.W.
Washington DC 20036
The prices range from $60 to $160 per night double occupancy. G.E.T.
currently has set aside 485 rooms for Sat April 8, and 535 rooms
for Sun, April 9. Evidently this is a very busy time of year for
DC, and these rooms are expected to go quickly. Sherri O'Dell
recommends that people make reservations as soon as possible - and
even cancel later, if need be - so as not to be left "roffless"
the eve of the march. Individuals wishing to reserve a room or
rooms will do so by specifying their desired price range, rather
than by setting out a preferred hotel name. G.E.T. will block
dlegations together, wherever possible.
Again, as in the case of flights, feel free to check with local
travel agents, if you think you can beat the G.E.T. prices. The
sense, however, is that rooms are going to be a precious commodity
come April. So, whatever you do, do it quickly.
Ann
|
325.75 | Other ways to support the march | TUT::LEACH | | Fri Feb 10 1989 09:33 | 41 |
|
Some Alternatives to Marching
If you can't attend the march, but want to help, here are some
ideas. Your help in these areas is deeply appreciated
To volunteer, you can call:
Boston: 617-782-4059
Acton: 508-264-NOW
Or your local NOW organization
BABYSITTING:
Mothers who want to march but can't take their children can use
babysitters in their homes, or in your home
CONTRIBUTIONS TO BUS FUND:
While most people will be paying their own way, there are some
who can't. Students and people on minimum incomes can be
subsidized. Your contribution can help.
Checks can be made payable to Massachusetts NOW.
Address: 971 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
LETTERS:
Letters are only 25 cents, but they have a real impact. A short
letter giving your point of view can be sent to the President,
your senator or representative, and even to the Supreme Court
Many addresses are in a list here in NOTES 325.
Ann
|
325.76 | Who were fellow attendees at Wed meeting? | TUT::LEACH | | Fri Feb 10 1989 09:49 | 7 |
| I chatted with two women from DEC at the Acton meeting on Wednesday.
But got so carried away with finding out how to get to Washington
that I never got your names.
I'm Ann. I've probably been reading your letters, but would love
to match them with the faces.
|
325.77 | Share hotel accommodations in Wash DC? | TUT::LEACH | | Fri Feb 10 1989 10:06 | 11 |
|
Would anyone like to share ahotel room in Washington?
With a smoker?
I'll be calling today to reserve a room in the $75 to $100 range.
Would love to share it with someone from DEC.
Ann
|
325.78 | tell me your experience | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Mon Feb 13 1989 10:32 | 13 |
|
I'm going to march. I've never done anything like this before,
ever, on any kind of scale, I don't think. (It's possible that
I engaged in some kind of small town civil rights or anti-war
demonstrations as a high school student but that was so long ago,
I have no clear memories of what exactly it is I might have done...)
I don't know anyone who's ever done anything like this, so I have
no idea what it could be like. If there are any readers out there
who are willing to tell the rest of us what their experience has
been, when they have marched for a cause, I'd be grateful to read
about it.
Christine
|
325.79 | a few memories | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Mon Feb 13 1989 10:49 | 12 |
| when i was but a lass, i marched against the vietnam war in washington
(i was young enough that my mother insisted on coming along to make
sure i was ok.) things were very peaceful during these protests -- we'd
walk a long way up wide avenues (d.c. is great for protest marches),
then attend some kind of rally where there were speeches and often
entertainment. you could get in trouble if you wanted, but i think you
had to try. (clearly, this wasn't true of all protest marches -- there
was certainly ugliness and violence in lots of places, both on the part
of the protestors and the cops.) the feeling in the air seemed magical,
energized, and positive.
liz
|
325.80 | my last march... | RAINBO::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Tue Feb 14 1989 00:07 | 27 |
| I went to the Lesbian/Gay Civil Rights March on Washington in October,
1987, and it was definitely one of those "tell your grandchildren you
were there" kind of experiences, like Woodstock (I was there, too).
There were at least half a million people there, and the energy and
exhiliaration cannot possibly be described. We walked from the Ellipse
to the Mall, and it took 5 hours for everyone to stream from point to
point. The Ellipse was packed with people, hanging out with their
delegations, waiting to set off. There was a very celebratory
atmosphere surrounding the whole thing. Washington DC was
flooded with "people like us", and it was enough to make one giddy.
The diversity of people sharing common goals was especially inspiring --
there was everyone from Dyke Doctors to Radical Faeries to Gay
Veterans to Lesbian Motorcycle Clubs, and folks from every state of the union.
There were a handful of religious protestors across from the White House,
assuring us we were all damned, but it didn't mar anyone's enthusiasm.
The police were cooperative -- there were no incidents that I'm aware of,
and they didn't pull out the rubber gloves until the Supreme Court CD.
There were various speakers and performers at the Mall, including Jesse
Jackson. The Names Quilt was also spread out on the Mall -- a very
moving and somber experience. People moving silently among the names,
and weeping for people they didn't even know. One of the special
moments I remember was leaving from the Mall Metro (subway) station,
when people sorta looked around and realized that WE WERE EVERYWHERE --
on the subway, in the station, up the stairs... There's no experience
like it.
|
325.81 | A few words about the march | AMUN::LEACH | | Tue Feb 14 1989 17:05 | 16 |
| Christine,
According to one of the orgnanizers, they do expect a large turnout.
The march won't be long or arduous, as a half-million (projected)
people don't move too fast.
March will be followed by a rally with several speakers. They're
talking about Barbara Harris, newly consecrated Episcopal bishop,
if they can get her, and others. Holly Near will sing. (That's
the sum total of my knowledge about THIS march.)
I marched for civil rights in Lowell with black friends. The whole
movement was a one-in-a-lifetime experience of closeness. The march
was pretty tame compared to all the other activities.
Ann
|
325.82 | thanks...more please | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Tue Feb 14 1989 17:32 | 10 |
|
Re: the last few.
Thanks... I'm looking forward to reading more if anyone else has
a memory to share. I'm looking forward to the march, I'm excited
and a little bit anxious. I think it will be an intensely emotional
event for me (if I can remain open to that) and I'm not too
comfortable with strong emotions.
CQ
|
325.83 | one more... | 2EASY::PIKET | | Wed Feb 15 1989 09:31 | 27 |
|
I marched a couple of years ago in Howard Beach, Queens, after the
incident in a pizza place there that left a black man dead, a couple
more injured, and the white residents muttering "what were they
doing there in the first place".
At first I was a little put off by the idea of everyone chanting
the same slogans at the same time, like a bunch of robots. But a
friend pointed out that this helped create the feeling of solidarity
that is important to any cause.
One upsetting point occurred when we marched past a group of
really angry-looking residents who were cursing at us, etc. I could
not believe the looks of pure hatred on the faces of those people.
Anyway, I really did get into the slogans after a while. I even
made one up! I didn't have the guts to shout it out, but my friend's
boyfriend did and soon everyone was saying it! I even saw Al Sharpton
(NOT one of my favorite activists) saying it on the news that night.
The whole thing was pretty inspiring. There were people of all
different ethnicities. And we al knew we were there for the same
reason - because it was the right thing to do. The only scary part was
when I got on the subway to go home late that night, but I won't
go into that.
Roberta
|
325.85 | getting off my apathy | TRADE::SULLIVAN | Karen - 296-5616 | Wed Feb 15 1989 15:19 | 11 |
| I'm going, and my mother is going with me. The Framingham
NOW chapter is offering bus trips down for $35. round trip.
It leaves late saturday night, and returns in the wee hours
of the morning Monday. This means there's no hotel costs.
(Of course, it will be very tiring too.)
Anyways, I'll try and remember to wear my womannotes T-shirt.
If others do that, maybe we'll see each other. But then
in crowds that big, it's unlikely.
...Karen
|
325.86 | Gearing Up | USEM::DONOVAN | | Fri Feb 17 1989 13:56 | 10 |
| Is anyone making a banner? Maggie, I heard you're an artist and
Tchen also mentioned it.
Can anyone give a landmark (restaurant or something) where we could
all meet? I don't know the area.
Is everyone all set for accomodations?
Kate
|
325.87 | Careful about a Digital banner | AMUN::LEACH | | Mon Feb 20 1989 13:59 | 5 |
| Not sure what kind of banner you mean.
If it's "Digital" better be careful. Digital isn't a sponsor and
might have problems with a Digital banner.
|
325.88 | =========wn | 2EASY::PIKET | | Mon Feb 20 1989 15:10 | 6 |
|
I thought a womannotes banner was the intention, myself. Although,
there again, a banner wouldn't represent the views of everyone in
this file.
Roberta
|
325.89 | I know what it's like... | SALEM::LUPACCHINO | There's a world beyond this room. | Tue Feb 21 1989 09:17 | 8 |
|
How about the T-shirt logo on a rather large piece of fabric? Good
luck to the person carrying it around with them all day...maybe
we need a sign up sheet for banner-sitters.
Yeah, and we can't use the corporate logo for this event.
am
|
325.91 | Right on, Marge! | RAINBO::TARBET | | Tue Feb 21 1989 09:29 | 1 |
|
|
325.92 | Reply to Marge | USEM::DONOVAN | | Tue Feb 21 1989 10:05 | 7 |
| Re;.90
Marge, I respect your opinion. I also respect you for being able
to voice your opinion in the face of controversy.
Thanks,
Kate
|
325.93 | More info on travel and rooms | AMUN::LEACH | | Tue Feb 21 1989 10:17 | 21 |
| Hi,
I've just reserved a room at the Hyatt on the mall in Washington
at a weekend rate of $89 for Sat night. Would love to share this
(I'm a smoker, so another smoker would probably be happier.)
Have also made reservation on the Easter shuttle chartered by Omni
travel for this occasion: $155 round trip.
So far, this $155 price is the best I could find.
If you're interested in reserving through Omni, you can call Meg
at 617-864-6130.
By the way, would any DECcies like to meet for dinner on Saturday
night? I expect the Hyatt has a restaurant. It's an idea, anyway!
Ann
I
|
325.95 | Alternate Airlines? | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Tue Feb 21 1989 13:48 | 8 |
| RE: .93
Will there be an Eastern Airlines in a month? Seriously, there may
well be a mechanics strike, which the pilots are likely to honor.
Many observers feel that that combination would put Eastern out of
business.
--David
|
325.96 | an aside | PACKER::WHARTON | | Tue Feb 21 1989 13:51 | 4 |
| re .95
If there is a strike in a month, during the time I'm suppose to
travel via Eastern, and I have already bought my ticket, what course
of action might I take?
|
325.97 | To Ann | USEM::DONOVAN | | Wed Feb 22 1989 09:26 | 16 |
| re:.93
Hi Ann,
I would love to have dinner with you on Saturday night at the Hyatt.
Does 8:00 sound too late? Would anyone else like to join us? I have
my reservations at Day's Inn but if you do not get any response,
call or mail me. I will find someone.
In the meantime, how many for dinner?? We'll all probably be starving
from our long journies.
P.S.
It will be a pleasure to meet you.
Kate
|
325.98 | Tickets, tickets...get your tickets here! | USEM::GILLARD | | Wed Feb 22 1989 12:39 | 16 |
| ...More on busses from Framingham...we (South Middlesex NOW) have
four busses reserved, leaving from Shoppers World, Rt.9, around
11:30PM on the 8th. We'll arrive in DC at approximately 9AM,
and leave around 7PM. Tickets are $35. round trip; all busses are
non-smoking.
I have tickets to sell (and more info), if anyone is interested.
Call me at DTN 223-6806.
I've been to - oh, a dozen or so - demonstrations in DC for various
causes. They are the reward for all the effort I put into women's
issues during the year! It's *the* most empowering experience I
have ever experienced...worth the looong bus ride!
Carolann
|
325.99 | when do we march? | SALEM::LUPACCHINO | There's a world beyond this room. | Wed Feb 22 1989 13:07 | 4 |
|
Does anyone have an official schedule of events on 4/9??
am
|
325.100 | | RAINBO::TARBET | | Wed Feb 22 1989 14:53 | 11 |
| Has anyone ever made a banner successfully? I expect I could do the
artwork portion in a somewhat credible way (the idea of using our
community logo sounds swell), but it's not all that clear that I really
know how to make the banner itself.
If you have made one that worked well, check me on this: 3-4 yards of
bleached muslin fastened to a couple of 8ft 1x2s, with slits in so that
it doesn't turn into a sail. Does that sound right? Should the poles
be something else like broom handles or something?
=maggie
|
325.101 | | MOSAIC::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Wed Feb 22 1989 15:09 | 4 |
| re: broom handles
well, round is easier to hold onto for a couple of hours than
rectangular...
|
325.102 | Banner and Dinner | USEM::DONOVAN | | Wed Feb 22 1989 16:16 | 8 |
| Maggie,
I'll take my turn as a designated holder. Also, will you be joining
us for dinner Sat night at the Hyatt? Catherine? Robin? Roberta?
Anyone?
Kate
|
325.103 | | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Wed Feb 22 1989 16:29 | 9 |
| isn't the hyatt a little pricey? there are plenty of other great
places to eat in d.c., say in addams morgan...
i'm not sure whether i'll be able to join the group; it depends
on what time the march starts (which will determine when i arrive
in d.c.). does anyone know when the march starts?
thanks
liz
|
325.104 | | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | it's high time I joined in the dance | Thu Feb 23 1989 10:04 | 11 |
|
re. 102 Kate,
I have decided not to rent a car, so I will be taking Public
Transportation 101 (cram course) when I get to D.C. If I can get
my buttskie *to* the Hyatt, I'm game....
as long as jeans are part of their evening dress code ;-).
~robin
|
325.105 | white? | ULTRA::ZURKO | Words like winter snowflakes | Fri Feb 24 1989 09:07 | 3 |
| Does anyone know why the organizers (or is it NOW?) are requesting that
marchers wear white? I'm always skeptical of requests I don't understand.
Mez
|
325.106 | Because (?) | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Fri Feb 24 1989 09:13 | 4 |
| Isn't that what the original advocates of suffrage for women wore
when they marched?
Ann B.
|
325.107 | 10:00 a.m. | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | it's high time I joined in the dance | Fri Feb 24 1989 10:50 | 17 |
|
re. ?time?
[borrowed from usenet w/o permission]
The march will start at 10:00 a.m. on the Mall between 7th and 14th
streets and ends at 5:00 p.m.
(Sympathy marches/rallies will be held in Paris, France and Oslo,
Norway at noon (local time) in front of the American Embassy. A
rally is also being considered in Bonn, Germany.)
~robin
|
325.108 | | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Fri Feb 24 1989 12:24 | 6 |
| huh. i just got the NOW newsletter and there was an ad there that
said the gathering starts at 10:30, the march starts at noon, and
the rally starts at 1:30.
thanks though...
liz
|
325.109 | Suffragettes from Hell! | MOSAIC::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Fri Feb 24 1989 12:41 | 18 |
| I didn't realize that participants were being asked to dress in white,
but I assume its because the orginal suffragettes did the same thing.
The images it has conjured up in my mind are wonderful. Here are a few:
Women in white lace gloves and garden hats (circa 1919), long skirts and
high-button shoes, wearing bandoliers and carrying squirt gun Uzis.
Banner: "New Suffragettes from Hell". I'd wear a skirt for this one,
and it's been literally years since I last did that!
Womennoters in white, with (lavender?) sashes, a la the orginal
suffragettes (wide satin, a rosette on the hip) with a =wn= logo and
WOMANNOTER written across the sash... white lace gloves with cut-off
fingers, summer white combat boots, straw boater with "Ladies Sewing
Circle and Terrorist Society" hatband optional...
I mean, even if your mother did tell you not to wear white before
Memorial Day, this *IS* the 1980s...
|
325.110 | if the weather would just cooperate | CIVIC::JOHNSTON | OK, _why_ is it illegal? | Fri Feb 24 1989 14:08 | 7 |
| ooh! Catherine, what a concept.
and I suppose I should try to shake out the old white summer uniform
from my school-days...white middy-blouse, calf-length skirt, white
cotton stockings and straw-hat
Ann
|
325.111 | | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | it's high time I joined in the dance | Fri Feb 24 1989 14:59 | 20 |
|
I just spoke with a woman from the National Headquarters of NOW (re.22 Ann,
thanks for the phone number!) to see if they had more details about the
march.
She said that the assembly starts at 10:15 a.m. (+/- 15 min ;-}) and they
figure it will take 'about' a couple of hours to organize the march
participants. The route has not been finalized yet (still working with the
city police on this), although the rally following the march is suppose to
be on the west side of the Capital Building. She also told me that the
speakers have not been confirmed, and declined to comment on *who* they
were asking to speak (but she did mention "people on a magnitude of Jesse
Jackson").
I guess we will have to wait for the details to trickle in as April
approaches.
~robin
|
325.112 | Anyone else game???? | METOO::LEEDBERG | Render Unto Peaches | Sat Feb 25 1989 12:36 | 32 |
|
< Note 325.109 by MOSAIC::IANNUZZO "Catherine T." >
-< Suffragettes from Hell! >-
>Women in white lace gloves and garden hats (circa 1919), long skirts and
>high-button shoes, wearing bandoliers and carrying squirt gun Uzis.
>Banner: "New Suffragettes from Hell". I'd wear a skirt for this one,
>and it's been literally years since I last did that!
>Womennoters in white, with (lavender?) sashes, a la the orginal
>suffragettes (wide satin, a rosette on the hip) with a =wn= logo and
>WOMANNOTER written across the sash... white lace gloves with cut-off
>fingers, summer white combat boots, straw boater with "Ladies Sewing
>Circle and Terrorist Society" hatband optional...
Catherine,
I love it - I will wear as close to the above as possible.
When I was at the Acton NOW meeting they talked about wearing
white and the lavender sashes and I thought to myself - "DO
I have anything to would work" - now I would be willing to
go shopping for what is needed.
_peggy
With a (-) on the back?????
|
|
325.113 | With the suffragettes... | ANKH::SMITH | Passionate commitment to reasoned faith | Sun Feb 26 1989 13:23 | 2 |
| Didn't yellow ribbons fit in there somewhere?
|
325.114 | | LYRIC::QUIRIY | | Mon Feb 27 1989 14:47 | 7 |
|
re: .109 I love it too. The image in my mind, of a multitiude
of marchers all in white is a powerful one, and I love the humor
of "New Suffragettes from Hell"! I'll have to shop for anything
white anyway, so it may as well be something pretty.
CQ
|
325.115 | mail me info for banner | VAXWRK::TCHEN | Weimin Tchen VAXworks 223-6004 PKO2-1/M21 | Wed Mar 01 1989 16:59 | 10 |
| Hi,
I'm planning to pick up some material, this weekend, to make a banner.
Could you tell me what design, colors, lettering and size you want.
If you're interested in working on this or have input, please send
mail. (Otherwise it's going to be up to my mother & me - she has
an old Singer :-) )
-Weimin
|
325.116 | NH NOW finally speaks... | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Thu Mar 02 1989 12:50 | 32 |
| I'm the treasurer of NH NOW and I thought I'd put our bus prices
in here, since others have been doing that.
The buses will leave from Durham and Manchester. We have a coach
bus (has a bathroom) for $50 and a noncoach bus for $35.
The buses will leave around 7:00 p.m. in Durham and at 8:00 in
Manchester on Saturday, April 8. They will arrive in Washington
in early morning and leave after the march. Just in time to arrive
fresh at work on Monday morning. :-)
Also, NOW is asking that the banners be like what the suffragettes
used. They are a tri-colored banner, with a purple, gold, and white
stripe. I can't remember the order of the colors or anything like
that. But at least it gives you something to go by if you want
to know what the rest of the banners will look like.
There will be parade marshalls along the route that you can go to
to find out where the official delegations will be gathering. So
if you want to be part of the Mass. crowd, at least the marshall
will be able to direct you. Otherwise, it may be difficult for
all of you to find one another.
I've spent a lot of time this week getting the NH details together.
I'm getting PSYCHED!!! I'll see you there...
judy
P.S. Send me mail if you want further information. I don't get
to read this file that much. But I'll read this note once a week
or so until April 9.
|
325.117 | Preliminary Attendance List | USEM::DONOVAN | | Thu Mar 02 1989 15:37 | 24 |
| So far, my attendance list reads as follows:
Kate Donovan
Lisa Veilleux
Roberta Piket
Weimen Tchen
Maggie Tarbet
Marilyn Irlbacher
Arun Sankar
Bonnie Reinke ??
Mez Zurko
Peggy Leedberg + daughter
Betty Kelly
Barbara Cobb
Pat Jeffries
Barbara Bazemore
Liz Augustine
Larry Turner??
Ann Johnson
Suzanne Poirier
Who did I forget? Also, surprisingly I only heard from 2 men.
Kate
|
325.118 | | MOSAIC::TARBET | | Thu Mar 02 1989 17:55 | 36 |
| Okay, I think I may have a reasonable overall design for a banner (the
colors still need to be worked out). I would be *very* grateful if
people who have experience of banners think about the dimensions.
Body: 3 x 9 feet, muslin or similar-weight cloth. Poles: 1 inch ash
dowels 6 feet long.
Design: one of our community logos (the circle of women used on the
tshirts) ca. 24 inches in diameter at each end. In between, the legend
WOMEN
OF NOTE
Connected With Other
Women All Over The World
in Schoolbook Bold, 10 inch letters for the top two lines, 6 inch
somewhat condensed letters for the bottom two. I can send a xerox if
anyone wants to see it.
I was originally planning to just spraypaint the design, but as Weimin
Tchen is also interested in working on the banner, if we have a few
more people particularly with really good sewing experience, we could
get together one saturday and do applique instead. Anyone out there
with that kind of skill and energy? Please volunteer!
Since this banner is likely to be carried in many events, my thought
was to attach 3 foot colored-ribbon streamers to the poles on which the
names and dates of the events could be recorded along with the
identities of those who participate. My thought was that we could
also attach unmarked streamers in cases such as this where we are
asked to conform to a particular color scheme.
Comments?
=maggie
|
325.120 | | 2EASY::PIKET | | Fri Mar 03 1989 12:46 | 8 |
|
I'm not sure anymore that I can go. Evidently most people are planning
to return Monday. I really need to be at work Monday. (Things
are heating up here.)
If there's any other way I can contribute, please let me know.
Roberta
|
325.121 | One more attendee | TUT::LEACH | | Fri Mar 03 1989 14:22 | 13 |
| You forgot Ann Leach. Wouldn't miss it for the world. Hope I can
find you in the Mass. delegation.
By the way, I'll be at the Hyatt on the mall Saturday night.
Plan to return to pick up luggage and have a bite to eat.
Anyone looking for a place to meet after the march? Maybe the
Hyatt would work.
I'll be checked out of the room by then, but they must have a
lobby, lounge, coffee shop, or restaurant.
Ann
|
325.122 | But How Could I Forget? | USEM::DONOVAN | | Fri Mar 03 1989 14:31 | 5 |
| RE:.121
Sorry, Ann.
Kate
|
325.123 | Gearing Up | USEM::DONOVAN | | Fri Mar 03 1989 15:09 | 35 |
| New list:
Kate Donovan
Lisa Veilleux
Roberta Piket?
Weimen Tchen
Maggie Tarbet
Marilyn Irlbacher
Arun Sankar
Bonnie Reinke
Mez Zurko
Peggy Leedburg + daughter
Betty Kelly
Barbara Cobb
Pat Jeffries
Barbara Bazemore
Liz Augustine
Larry Turner?
Ann Johnson
Suzanne Poirier
Ann Leach
Robin Aagesen
Since everyone will be with a state, will you non-Mass people
please join us with the Mass delegation? We've got to be somewhere.
Maybe we should be somewhere nuetral like Alaska. Only kidding.
Also, Maggie, I am an artist. Although I primarily work in oils,
I will help with the banner if necessary. My 2 little ones keep
me bust so if you need me, I need notice. I am a terrible sewer.
Kate
Could someone please call me and tell me how to copy this list onto
another note when I want to add or delete?
|
325.124 | I'll be there with S. Middlesex NOW | TRADE::SULLIVAN | Karen - 296-5616 | Fri Mar 03 1989 17:06 | 0 |
325.125 | NH NOW speaks again...sigh | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Fri Mar 03 1989 17:57 | 18 |
| A correction to my note of .116. The price for the coach bus is
going to be $55, rather than $50. When we called to reserve the
bus and give them more details the company told us we had to get
a hotel room for the driver, since we are going to be in the city
for more than 8 hours. Company policy, etc...
Also, if Womannotes gets 20 people they can be an official delegation.
I have a form that I'll be happy to send to one of you to fill out.
It doesn't mean that you have to pay or anything, but at least you'll
have an official "spot" that the parade marshalls can direct folks
to.
If you want the form, put your mailstop here and I'll send it along.
The form doesn't say that you have to be an official NOW group,
and since so many other groups are also sponsoring the march, I
would think Womannotes could qualify!
judy
|
325.126 | I'm going too... | LYRIC::QUIRIY | | Sat Mar 04 1989 11:25 | 34 |
|
I am going too, as well as my sweetie. I think it would be great if
we could be an official delegation; I'll volunteer to do the paper
work -- my mail stop is MRO1-2/L14.
Also, for those of you who may not have a room yet, there is an inn
that, as of yesterday, still had rooms available. The guide book I
have says the rooms are $25-$75 for a single and $35-$75 for a
double. (These figures may no longer be accurate, but maybe they're
close.) The only problem is that you have to arrive before 9:30 of
your first night's stay to pick up the key. Our flight arrives at
10:00 Friday night and there's no way for us to get there earlier,
so we had to go somewhere else.
The name of the inn is The Kalorama Guest House. They evidently
have several houses around the city that they use. The price of the
room includes a continental breakfast. They may also charge for a
parking space, if you intend to rent a car or drive your own down.
The phone number to call is (202)667-6369.
The inn we are staying at is The Tabard Inn. The book says they
charge $43-$90 for a single and $69-$105 for a double; when I
reserved our room, I was quoted a price of between $98 and $119 per
night. They had at least one room when I called, so maybe they have
more. Their number is (202)785-1277.
I read in Travel and Leisure magazine that the weekend of the 9th is
the National Cherry Blossom Festival weekend, so it's not just "the
season", it's the OFFICIAL season. I expect that means rooms are at
their tightest.
See you all there...
Christine
|
325.127 | Back a few replies.... | SALEM::LUPACCHINO | There's a world beyond this room. | Mon Mar 06 1989 07:38 | 4 |
|
I'll be there.
am
|
325.128 | checking in again... | MOSAIC::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Mon Mar 06 1989 12:04 | 3 |
| I'll be there, too.
Catherine
|
325.129 | Any one needs a ride? | OMKAR::SANKAR | Arundhati Sankar | Tue Mar 07 1989 08:47 | 19 |
| I am planning on renting a van (seats 15 people) and going with a
group of Pro Choice supporters on Saturday Apr 8th. My Cousin has
offered his house for us to spread our sleeping bags for 1 or 2 nights.
We may drive back on Sunday night or early Monday morning.
I already have 7 people signed up to go with me. If any one wants
to join let me know. We may start from either Nashua or Littleton DEC
facility. We can pick up people from any DEC fecility on our way.
I estimate the trip to Cost about $20 + food.
( $180(renting) + $90(gas) + $30(toll) = $300/15 = $20/each).
I am willing to bear the cost for any one, who is hesitating due to
money. In addition I know of people who can't go due child care reasons,
and are willing to help with money. So let not money deter you from joining us.
Arun.
|
325.130 | Latest List | USEM::DONOVAN | | Tue Mar 07 1989 10:50 | 34 |
| Here is today's list:
Kate Donovan
Lisa Veilleux
Roberta Piket
Weimen Tchen
Marilyn Irlbacher
Arun Sankar
Bonnie Reinke
Mez Zurko
Peggy Leedburg + daughter
Betty Kelly
Barbara Cobb
Pat Jeffries
Barbara Bazemore
Liz Augustine
Larry Turner?
Ann Johnson
Suzanne Poirier
Ann Leach
Robin Aagesen
Jim Mackin
Marty Jack
Judy Blachek
Christine Quiriy+ friend
A M Lupacchino
Catherine Iannuzzo
That's 27 people so far. Unfortunately, only 4 are men. I'll keep
you all posted.
In Unity There is Strength,
Kate
|
325.131 | Did I decide not to go, Kate? ;') | RAINBO::TARBET | kwatz | Tue Mar 07 1989 11:19 | 1 |
|
|
325.132 | We're pretty sure | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Tue Mar 07 1989 15:08 | 5 |
| Cynthia Kagno and I will probably make it. We'd like to go by bus,
so we'll check with Framingham NOW for a ride. (Unless someone can
tell me of busses leaving from some place closer to Hudson.)
--David
|
325.133 | count me in | SAGE::BARRY | Sandra J. Barry -BOIS- 264-0187 | Tue Mar 07 1989 15:25 | 2 |
| I'm going! We have a full car load at this point.
Sandy Barry
|
325.134 | Standards for Banners | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Wed Mar 08 1989 10:11 | 7 |
| I talked to a woman from Worcester NOW last night, and she said
that you can order banners for particular groups from one place,
so all the banners have the same colors. She promised to send me
information on having banners made, and I'll post it here when I
receive it.
--David
|
325.135 | List and MORE! | USEM::DONOVAN | | Wed Mar 08 1989 15:59 | 48 |
| Current list:
Maggie Tarbet
Lisa Veilleux
Kate Donovan
Roberta Piket
Weimen Tchen
Marilyn Irlbacher
Arun Sankar
Bonnie Reinke
Mez Zurko
Peggy Leedburg + Daughter
Betty Kelly
Barbara Cobb
Pat Jeffries
Barbara Bazemore
Liz Augustine
Larry Turner?
Ann Johnson
Suzanne Poirier
Ann Leach
Robin Aagesen
Jim Mackin
Marty Jack
Judy Blachek
Christine Quiriy + Friend
A.M.Lupacchini
Catherine Iannuzzo
Karen Sullivan
Mandy Nason
Cynthia Kagno
David Wittenberg
Sandy Barry
Jane Halvorson
We're 32 strong and GROWING!
By the way, There's a lecture being put on by the American Civil
Liberties Union at Worcester Public Library on March 15th @ 7:30
pm regarding the specifics of the laws regarding abortion. It's
best to know the facts. I would like to go. I live 5 minutes away.
Is anyone interested?
In Unity There is Strength,
Kate
If I forgot anybody, I'll get ya on there next time. We're 32 strong!
|
325.136 | one more for the roster | HBO::BACHELDER | ybnormal | Wed Mar 08 1989 16:27 | 6 |
| Count me in! I'm definitely going to be bringing one friend and
maybe even two more! Is everyone still planning on meeting for
dinner at the Hyatt Saturday night?
- L
|
325.137 | Know the Law | BOISPG::BARRY | Sandra J. Barry -BOIS- 264-0187 | Thu Mar 09 1989 09:41 | 7 |
| re: 325.135
I'm interested in going to Worcester the 15th. Could you provide
directions to the Public Library.
Thanks,
Sandy
|
325.138 | To Sandy | USEM::DONOVAN | | Thu Mar 09 1989 10:15 | 10 |
| Sandy,
Follow main street Worcester past the Galleria (big mall) which
is set in on your left. Take that next left. I don't know the name
of the street. The Library will be on your right. The windows are
long and thin. I think the adress is on New Salem Street. If you
get lost, ask anyone. If you want, I can meet you there. Call me
if you're interested.
Kate
|
325.139 | Us too | CURIE::ROCCO | | Thu Mar 09 1989 10:38 | 2 |
| Add Muggsie Rocco and Greg Rocco to the list. We are going also!
|
325.140 | Our plans, please join us. | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Thu Mar 09 1989 11:40 | 10 |
| Ok, I think we're sort of organized. Cynthia Kagno, Bonnie Reinke,
and I are going to take the bus from Framingham. I think Carolann
Gillard is going too, or maybe she's just trying to get the rest
of us to go. It leaves Shopper's World at 11:30. If any other
WomanNoters want to join us, contact Carolann (USEM::) Gillard for
tickets. They cost $35 round trip. If enough people come, I might
mistake it for a party and make something chocolate to eat on the
way.
--David
|
325.141 | possible help | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Torpedo the dam, full speed astern | Thu Mar 09 1989 12:50 | 5 |
| re: the left to take on Main Street in Worcester to get to the library
I think it's either Fulton st or Franklin St.
The Doctah
|
325.142 | Could someone summarize Worcester mtg? | TLE::HALVORSON | | Thu Mar 09 1989 14:39 | 4 |
| Does anybody know shorthand? :-) I can't make the meeting in
Worcester, but I'd enjoy reading a summary of what you learn there.
Jane
|
325.143 | Note To Jane | USEM::DONOVAN | | Thu Mar 09 1989 14:54 | 7 |
| re:.142
Jane, I sure don't know shorthand. I can't even type. But aside
from being the world's worst secretary, I have a fairly good ear
for detail and I'll keep you posted.
Kate
|
325.144 | more on banners | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Thu Mar 09 1989 19:13 | 16 |
| Some information I just got from Worcester NOW:
I have a "March Participation Form" which is presumably what is
needed to be considered a delegation. It asks about our banner.
Banners should be purple white and gold in vertical panels -
replicas of banners carried by the Suffrage movement.
Unfortunately, the order deadline was March 1, so =maggie please
take this as guidance. It further says "Uniform banners are
important for their visual impact and their strategic link to the
historic fight for women's rights ttha has been unde way in this
country for over a century."
Will someone from this group fill out the participation form?
=maggie? Let me know and I'll send it along.
--David
|
325.145 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Fri Mar 10 1989 08:58 | 10 |
| Well, if that's all the information available, it's unlikely that ours
would conform to their guidelines even were we to try, David: there's
nothing there apart from basic colors and stripe orientation.
I'd like further guidance, gyns & guys: are we carrying a banner to
help out the organisers or to show our own identity and solidarity? The
two goals won't mix very well unless everyone thinks that the purple/
white/gold color scheme is a great one for our permanent banner too.
=maggie
|
325.146 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Fri Mar 10 1989 09:00 | 1 |
| oh, and yah sure, David, I'll fill up the form; send it along.
|
325.147 | the banner | LYRIC::QUIRIY | | Fri Mar 10 1989 11:53 | 12 |
|
I would feel uncomfortable if the banner expressed our identity
and solidarity in a way that separates us from the rest of the marchers
-- does that make any sense? I was all for a banner at first, but
now that I hear that NOW wants the banners to conform to a standard,
and that standard is not clearly understood, I'm afraid that any "home
grown" banner won't conform, and then (if I was marching beneath it)
I'd feel as though I was trying to be separate from the larger group.
(The point is probably moot, since last estimate I heard was for 1
MILLION marchers, and that number is just to huge to comprehend.)
CQ
|
325.148 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Fri Mar 10 1989 12:21 | 25 |
| The reason I asked for guidance, Christine, is that the designs I've
done have all been predicated on the idea that we want a *permanent*
banner that groups of us can march under on many different occasions,
one that can serve both as a way for us to find one another in a large
crowd� and as a totem on which we can keep a record of our
participation.
If the banner is to be a permanent one, then it should meet our needs
rather than those of some particular event, and we should tie streamers
to the poles to reflect the colors of any particular march (purple,
white, and gold streamers in this case).
If the banner is NOT to be a permanent one, then I need to know that
REAL SOON so that we can do something that doesn't take so much work
and won't make us cry when we throw it away.
=maggie
� can you imagine trying to find one particular banner among 500
virtually identical ones!? On the other hand, I'm not sure *anything*
would make much difference in a crowd of a MILLION people! Holy
catfish!
|
325.149 | a few ideas | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Fri Mar 10 1989 12:53 | 11 |
|
if the banner is being made by applique, perhaps the appliqued parts
could be _velcroed_ (snapped, hook-and-eye taped) on so that only the
background changes?
i think a purple, gold and white banner would be just lovely, permanent
or otherwise, and i'd like to "fit in" with the group. at the same
time, i imagine there will be a _lot_ of non-conformant banners.
liz
|
325.150 | Note To Maggie | USEM::DONOVAN | | Fri Mar 10 1989 13:10 | 11 |
| I was thinking more on the lines of a place holder type of thing
so that we could find one another inside the Massachusetts delegation.
I think we'd leave it up to artist descretion. Maggie, What do YOU
want to do? I would feel fine with your decision.
After all, there will probably be various groups marching. People
from Planned Parenthood and the ACLU. etc.
Kate
|
325.152 | Got my tickets this morning | SKYLRK::OLSON | Doctor, give us some Tiger Bone. | Fri Mar 10 1989 13:26 | 8 |
| Add me to the list, Kate, I'll be there.
And while California will be calling, I think I'll be joining
the Massachusetts delegation for this event! (BTW- If I can't
find the =wn= banner because we're lost in the millions, I'll
be *pissed*.)
DougO
|
325.153 | Color Schemes | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Fri Mar 10 1989 14:18 | 13 |
| Since the description of banners explicitly mentioned a tie to a
100 year old tradition, it seems to me that that particular color
choice will be reasonable for quite a while. If we wanted to have
a matching banner, there is an adress for orders, but the deadline
is March 1. The cost is about $75. We could ask for a better
description of the pattern, or simply go our own way. I lean
towards using the "official" colors, and whatever pattern makes
most sense to the artists making it.
On a seperate issue, the literature I have specifically asks that
participants wear white.
--David
|
325.154 | high-button shoes come next... | MOSAIC::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Fri Mar 10 1989 14:29 | 5 |
| on the wearing white issue, I bought a pair of white lace gloves last
night ($2.99 at Woolworth's). I've found a charming white straw boater.
I think I'll wear it with a white shirtwaist (long skirt), lavender
necktie, and a "Suffragettes from HELL" jacket I'm planning to put
together from Goodwill scavengings...
|
325.155 | Re: finding the rest of Womannotes | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Fri Mar 10 1989 15:41 | 15 |
| There will be folks at the march called Parade Marshals. There
will be two of these for each delegation, trying to keep the delegation
together. Then there will be Parade Facilitators. These are the
people that you want to go to to find out where your Delegation
is assembling.
I sent the official NOW form that you send it to form a delegation
to Christine Q. That way, Womannotes will have an official spot
in the march. You should be able to find them by asking the
facilitators, who will have the delegations mapped out.
This might mean that Womannotes isn't near the MASS delegation.
But who knows???
judy
|
325.156 | delegation name | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Fri Mar 10 1989 16:14 | 12 |
|
Should our delegation be called "Women of Note"?
What about the men in our midst?
Any other suggestions for delegation name? I've heard from Judy
Blachek that there is (or may be) a March 20th deadline for
submitting the delegation paper work, so I'd like to mail it next
week, say next Wednesday. I'd like the banner name to be echoed
by the delegation name -- is there any reason for doing so? -- but
we won't all be women. Is this a problem?
CQ
|
325.157 | Another for the lecture | NRPUR::NASON | | Mon Mar 13 1989 08:32 | 8 |
| RE: 325.135
I'll be at the lecture in Worcester. Anybody interested in have dinner before
hand? Send me mail - NRPUR::NASON.
Mandy
|
325.158 | fashion update | MOSAIC::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Mon Mar 13 1989 14:23 | 23 |
| well, I have purchased The Hat. It's a white straw boater-style (flat
crown, flat brim, wider than the a true boater, but appropriate turn-of-
the century sporty wear). The hatband is black grosgrain ribbon with
white polka-dots, with a flurry of ribbon in a bow at the back.
(For anyone who cares, similar hats are available at Bradlees. Many
other chains are stocking something of this sort for Easter wear).
The complete look so far:
Hat
White lace gloves
White skirt (not exactly ankle length, but long enough)
White shirt with tie (I'm waffling between lavender knit and black
leather with studs :-)
Long white cardigan. I'm working on the design that will go on the back
of it. I has flames and the legend: "Suffragettes from HELL" in a
suitably lurid design.
Mirror shades.
Ladylike, ankle-high white sneakers.
Now, would studded leather wristbands be too much? What about your
basic hardware-store chain?
|
325.159 | third try to enter this note :-} | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Mon Mar 13 1989 15:51 | 9 |
|
seesh, Catherine, my note sounds pretty tame after yours (and why
not try tasteful stainless steel link chains :-) ).
anyway, I found out this weekend that my oldest son will also
be at the April 9th March. He's going on a bus with his college.
Bonnie
|
325.160 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Thu Mar 16 1989 11:21 | 7 |
| <** Moderator Response **>
As Bonnie asked in an rx I just deleted :-) please let's keep this
string dedicated to planning. Topic 183 is devoted to opinion and
argument about abortion as such.
=maggie
|
325.161 | 2 April 89 in San Francisco | SKYLRK::OLSON | Doctor, give us some Tiger Bone. | Sat Mar 18 1989 19:03 | 6 |
| I've received a flyer discussing another March and Rally the week
before Washington, in San Francisco 2 April. It contains outright
solicitations and I don't want to post it (due to Digital solicitation
policies). Please contact me by email if you're interested in this flyer.
DougO
|
325.162 | Hi-ho, hi-ho, its off to DC we go.... | GERBIL::IRLBACHER | A middle class bag lady | Thu Mar 23 1989 17:32 | 23 |
| I haven't the energy to read all the replies, and don't seem to
have enough knowledge about moving around in notes to find exactly
what I am looking for.
So...when all of us bright-eyed and bushy-tailed =wn= get there,
*how* do we find =wn= groups, are there any *specific* places where
most of us will be hanging out [or hanging on, whatever the case
may be] or will our =wn= groups be scattered all over?
Someone in the 13 member-van group I will be with was wondering if we
should/could, [and if so, what] use something like balloons to find
each other.
I believe the above is a bit jumbled, but if it can be sorted out
and anyone can answer any of my questions, please do so.
**I can just imagine what DC is going to look like: 60 zillion women
trying to do their thing while 30 zillion pairs of eyeballs try
to view the cherry blossom festival while trying not to get stomped
on by the 60 zillion marching women.
Marilyn
|
325.163 | | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Fri Mar 24 1989 09:30 | 8 |
| well, we'll have a banner, but balloons sound like a great idea, too.
(purple, gold, and white ones?) rumor has it that we're an "official
group", which means that there will supposedly be someone we can ask
questions of (like "where is my group"). finding _that_ person,
though, might be a good trick!!
liz
|
325.164 | Ask a marshall | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Fri Mar 24 1989 10:05 | 8 |
| My understanding (from the vantage of the third assistant to the
second backup contact of the =wn= group) is that there will be
"marshalls" or some such who will direct you to your state, and
within the state to your group. I believe we will be under
Massachusetts. I don't remember if our group is "WomanNotes" or
"Women of Note".
--David
|
325.165 | see ya there | TOOK::HEFFERNAN | Accept provolone into your life | Fri Mar 24 1989 10:11 | 6 |
| I'll be going down with my friend Cate and I'll try look out for the
Digital contigent and hopefully meet some real live -wm-er's!
john
|
325.166 | New list | USEM::DONOVAN | | Fri Mar 24 1989 14:31 | 31 |
|
Latest List of attendees
Maggie Tarbet Robin Aagesen
Lisa Veilleux Jim Mackin
Kate Donovan Marty Jack
Roberta Piket Judy Blachek
Weimen Tchen Christine Quiriy + Friend
Marilyn Irlbacher A.M. Luppacchini
Arun Sankar Catherine Iannuzzo
Bonnie Reinke Karen Sullivan
Mez Zurko Mandy Nason
Peggy Leedberg + daughter Cynthia Kagno
Betty Kelly David Wittenberg
Barbara Cobb L.Bachelder + Friend
Pat Jeffries Muggsie Rocco and Gregg
Barbara Bazemore Carolyn Gillard
Liz Augustine Gregg Olson
Larry Turner? Les Slater and SO and son
Ann Johnson Sarah Kahn
Suzanne Poirier Charles Hayne
Ann Leach John Heffernan and Cate
Has the paperwork been sent in to make us an official delegation?
What is the status on a banner?
In Unity There is Strength,
Kate
|
325.167 | Yes, we are a delegation! | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | | Fri Mar 24 1989 17:29 | 19 |
|
Are we a delegation? I think so. I sent the paperwork in awhile
ago, but haven't heard anything back. I
don't know if I _will_ hear anything back,
but if I do, I'll post the info here.
What's our name? We are Women of Note.
Where're we from? Well, I had to pick a state, so I picked
New Hampshire. (Or, Nude Hampster, as I saw
in some other conference.)
So, I guess, as David said a few back, that when we get there, there
will be marshalls, or officials-of-some-sort, and you can just ask
them where Women of Note are located. I like the balloon idea,
too -- it may not help (if there are thousands of other balloons)
but it's not likely to hinder.
Christine
|
325.169 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | I'm the NRA | Mon Mar 27 1989 07:54 | 2 |
| re .167 That's Cow Hampshire, except for the southern end
of the state - New Chusetts
|
325.170 | finding each other; dinner on Sat | TUT::LEACH | | Mon Mar 27 1989 16:17 | 21 |
| Can't believe how we've grown since around Note 160!
Yes, how to find you? So, Kate, you're saying that Women of Note
will be marching with New Hampshire rather than Massachusetts?
Hope I can march with Women of Note even if out of costume? Well,
I mean, not wearing white, lace, and army boots.
I wanted to revisit the idea of dinner on Saturday night for those
who will be arriving then. We talked about getting together at
the HYatt Regency, which is located on the Mall. Time: Around
8 p.m. If I have an idea of the numbers, I can reserve a table
where we can find each other.
Also, if anyone is desperate, I've reserved a room at the Hyatt
Saturday, and would welcome a roommate. Room is (total) $89 for the night.
I do smoke, so a fellow smoker might be more comfortable.
Ann
|
325.171 | AFTER the march | TUT::LEACH | | Mon Mar 27 1989 16:33 | 11 |
|
Then, there's the other end of the march...Does anyone have plans
for AFTER the march? I suppose it's hard to predict how everything
will go and how long it will last. But wondered about using the
Hyatt as a handy meeting place after the march, too -- I expect
to return to the lobby to pick up luggage and wait for a 9:40 plane.
Anyone want to join me?
Ann
|
325.172 | NOTE TO ANN | USEM::DONOVAN | | Tue Mar 28 1989 11:47 | 12 |
| Ann,
I am wearing white. Jeans and a sweatshirt, white. Nothing too
elaborate. Christine put our delegation in New Hampshire. Fine
with me. There are about 4 of us who will meet you at the Hyatt
in my party. If no one else shows up we'll still have a blast!
Is everyone getting keyed up for this? I am.
Kate
|
325.173 | | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Tue Mar 28 1989 14:42 | 17 |
| Yesterday the president of NH NOW got the final route and other
details. The march is assembling around the Washington monument.
There will be official March Facilitators who will be wearing purple
sashes. These will be the people with the maps to show where the
different delegations are assembling. Any of them should be able
to tell you where Women of Note are assembling--if they can't they
should be able to direct you to someone else who does know.
I am getting very psyched! I'm keeping track of the NH folks on
the buses and every day I get about 15 more people wanting to go
on the bus.
I'll be marching with the NH NOW delegation, but I hope to see Women
Of Note. I've been telling everyone about the Sufragettes from
Hell!
Judy
|
325.174 | more details | QARRY::QUIRIY | | Tue Mar 28 1989 19:00 | 110 |
|
Final March Details from NOW.
I got an info packet yesterday and there's lots of good info in it --
anyone who wants a copy, let me know via mail and I'll send you one.
I can't answer questions -- all I know is what I've gotten from the
NOW literature, which I've typed in here.
There's some info on the first page that tells where buses should
park, depending on what direction you approach the city from. I
don't think it's necessary to enter that here. (Does anyone want
or need that info?)
The Metro is opening at 8 a.m. on Sunday. Metro employees will be
selling fare cards on the sidewalk near the entrance. The fare for
march participants to and from the event will be $1.60/person. The
closest stops to the Washington Monument are Smithsonian or Federal
Triangle (blue/orange lines) or Metro Center (red line).
Facilitators will be wearing purple sashes.
IMPORTANT!
First, NOW needs to know, as accurately as possible, how many
people will be marching. So, those of you who plan to march with
the Women of Note delegation, please send me mail. I'll respond
back to you, by Friday, this week, with the list of respondants,
and that way you will know that you have been counted.
FACILITATORS!
NOW needs lots of workers. There will be briefing sessions for
facilitators the week leading up to the march.
Facilitators are needed for general duty, button/sash sales,
fundraising collection, and last-minute tasks. (They also want a
facilitator for each delegation, and I'm supposed to mail this form
back, so I will volunteer to be our facilitator -- I'll also
willingly share the duties with anyone who volunteers.) Anyone who
wants to pick up some of the other duties, I'd bet you can
volunteer just by going to one of the briefing sessions listed
below.
Here are the dates, times & locations of the briefings:
- Tuesday, April 4 and Thursday, April 6, 6:30-9:00 p.m.
First Congregational Church
945 G Street, NW
(one block from Metro Center).
- Saturday, April 8 12:30, 3:30, and 7:00 p.m.
Capitol Hilton, Congressional Room
16th and K Streets NW
(across from NOW office)
- Sunday, April 9, continuous briefings beginning at 7:00 a.m.
Washington Monument grounds (assembly site)
HOTELS
For hotel info, call Vicki Ferguson, 1-800-228-0861.
ASSEMBLY
10 a.m. on the Washington Monument grounds (between 15th and 17th
Streets and Constitution and Independence Avenues, NW). Marchers
will assemble by delegation. Delegations will be assigned to
specific areas on the grounds. When you arrive at the assembly
site, look for a purple-sashed facilitator, tell that person the
name of your delegation, and she or he will direct you to your
assigned area. It is important to assemble your delegation as
early as possible. Kickoff rally, 10:45; speakers and
entertainers.
MARCH
Step-off at 12:00 noon sharp. Up Constitution Avenue, right on 1st
Street NE, past the Supreme Court to the US Capitol Building;
enter Capitol grounds off 1st Street and walk around to West side
for rally. (approx. 2 miles to Court; shortcut to Capitol 1 mile).
Rally begins at 1:30 p.m.
Pacifica radio, WPFW, 89.3 FM, will be broadcasting live; you may
want to bring a portable radio.
RALLY
Capitol West side, 1:30 p.m.; speakers and celebrities; rally ends
at 5:00 p.m.
GENERAL NEEDS
Concession stands offering food and drink will be around the
assembly and rally sites. Because of the crowds expected, we
encourage you to bring your own food and drink, too. Dressing in
layered light weight clothing is encouraged, as the day will get
warmer. Portable [sic] comfort facilities will be provided; in
addition, museum facilities will be open along the march route.
SPECIAL NEEDS
Special transportation will be available for those who are unable
to walk or negotiate the march route; please register with the
National NOW March Office at 202-331-0066. Alternative
transportation will be available at the corner of 15th and Madison
Streets at the assembly site. Special seating will be provided at
both the assembly and rally sites. Signing for the hearing
impaired will be provided at both sites, with seating near the
signers.
|
325.175 | a little clarification | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Wed Mar 29 1989 11:19 | 35 |
|
This is to answer the question "why New Hampshire?" in case some
of you are wondering.
The form I filled out wanted to know which NOW chapter our
delegation was coordinating with. I'm not a member of NOW, so I
wasn't coordinating with any chapter. I don't think of =wn= as
having a state of origin, or a "home town" -- I think of notes
conferences, =wn= included, as existing everywhere in the world.
I don't know the participants of this conference well enough to
know if there is a majority of people from "state X" going to
Washington, so I couldn't match the delegation with that. I know
that at least one person is flying out from somewhere to the west,
and that some other DECcies will be there who are not from a New
England state.
It was clear to me that I'd have to choose a state if I wanted to
fill in the application form completely, and I wanted to do that
because I feared that failing to do so would automatically cause
the application to be rejected. A call to my local NOW chapter
didn't help; the woman who returned my call didn't have an answer
or an opinion.
So, I picked the NOW chapter of the woman who'd sent me the form.
And that happened to be Nude Hampster.
So, would all those who are marching in the Women of Note
delegation please send me mail. NOW wants to get as accurate a
count as possible and they are either going to call me, or I will
call them with our number.
Thanks,
Christine
|
325.176 | | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Wed Mar 29 1989 11:31 | 8 |
| Christine,
I'd like to express my appreciation for all the work you're doing on
this project. It's clearly a necessary task, one that i didn't have
extraneous energy for, and i'm really glad you picked it up.
thanks!
liz
|
325.177 | Better late than not at all. | VAXRT::CANNOY | Convictions cause convicts. | Wed Mar 29 1989 12:36 | 8 |
| Well, I've decided to go, too. It looks like I'll be coming down
with the South Middlesex NOW, but I'll hook up with the Womannotes
ASAP.
Does anyone have any approximate idea as to the length of the march,
how many miles?
Tamzen
|
325.178 | NOTE TO TAMZEN | USEM::DONOVAN | | Wed Mar 29 1989 13:02 | 10 |
| Tanzen,
I don't know how many miles the route is but it is going to last
at least 3 hours.
Kate
P.S. We're all glad you're coming. I usually shy away from collective
"we's" but not in this case. Welcome.
|
325.180 | march distance & a thanks | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Wed Mar 29 1989 16:53 | 8 |
|
re: .176, Liz. Thank you.
re: .177, Tamzen. I'd guess the route is 3 miles. The wording
in the latest bulletin is ambiguous -- or I'm dense -- but it
appears to be 3 miles.
CQ
|
325.181 | Ever move a million people? It'll be sllllooooww | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Wed Mar 29 1989 18:04 | 16 |
| As I understand it, the march itself will last from noon to 1:30.
Then we start in with the after march rallies. If any of you need
transportation, National NOW has vans for those among us who are
physically handicapped (or challenged, if you will).
You need to call National NOW to register for that. The number
is: (202) 347-2279.
Yesterday I got reservations for *46* people in the mail. (NH NOW's
deadline is today, so I'm willing to bet I'll get a lot today.)
I'd say there will be 240 people there from NH, just on the buses!
judy
P.S. This is the most money I've ever seen, and *none* of it is
mine! Sigh.
|
325.182 | FWIW | SALEM::LUPACCHINO | There's a world beyond this room. | Thu Mar 30 1989 09:48 | 9 |
|
I maybe repeating myself but the last time I was in DC for a mega-march,
it took hours before the last contingent moved into the street.
Because of the delay, my group missed a lot of the post-march rally.
This may or may not happen at on 4/9 but I'm gonna be prepared to
do a lot of waiting!
am
|
325.183 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Thu Mar 30 1989 10:07 | 4 |
| That's my sense of what'll happen too, AM; I can't help but think the
organisers either expect many fewer than 1M people, don't care about
the feelings of the women who'll miss the rally, or have incredibly
sucky planning skills.
|
325.184 | celebrities planning on attending also.. | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Thu Mar 30 1989 10:19 | 7 |
| In the Globe this morning, there is a mention of some of the
celebrities who are planning to attend the rally. They include
Morgan Fairchild, Donna Mills, Glenn Close, Kelly McGillis, Cybil
Shepherd, Susan Saradon, Marlo Thomas, Polly Bergen, Ellen Burstyn,
Teri Garr, Veronica Hamel, and Valerie Harper.
|
325.185 | Leaders ALso? | USEM::DONOVAN | | Thu Mar 30 1989 11:13 | 6 |
| I am glad all these well respected actresses are going to speak.
I also hope to see women in politics and religion and other po-
sitions of leadership.
Kate
|
325.186 | Censorship rears its ugly head | TSG::DOUGHERTY | Tykes from Hell... | Thu Mar 30 1989 16:41 | 36 |
|
According to Boston NOW...
There are radio stations in Boston (and in major metropolitan cities across the
country) who are refusing to do ANY type of publicity for the March for
Reproductive Rights of Women in Washington because the topic is too
controversial.
They are:
WBZ 787 - 7000
WZLX 267 - 0123
WODS 436 - 2200
WXKS 396 - 1430
WMJX 542 - 0241
I think this calls for LOUD and LONG protesting! I'm going to call the General
Manager of each of these stations and let them know how I feel. I encourage
each and everyone of you to do the same.
Hey, we could keep all their phone lines busy with pro-choice
callers protesting such blatant censorship and disregard for women's lives!
Letters are also very effective! I'll draft a sample letter and post it as a
reply for anyone who would like to send a letter.
This is censorship by the very people
who promise to keep up apprised of all the "late breaking" news. and "hot
news items"!
Let's show them they are dealing with a powerful force!
|
325.187 | | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Thu Mar 30 1989 19:50 | 22 |
| Yes, there will be other leaders to speak. I know they were trying
to get Barbara Harris, the first Episcopal Bishop. I don't know
if they got her.
Re: -.1
Last Friday's Globe had an article about the radio stations refusing
to air the ad. Most of them did not like the format--it simulated
a newscast. Or at least that's the excuse they gave ...
BCN and ZOU are airing the ad, I think. But I haven't heard it
since I don't listen to the radio.
Re: the rally and the large crowd
I'm not sure how anyone would get a crowd that size to end up at
the finish near the same time. It's the same problem that the Boston
Marathon has, or any parade that I've ever seen. That's why it's
a good idea to bring along your portable radios to catch what is
going on at the other end of the crowd.
judy
|
325.188 | Other Transportation info | BUFFER::ALUSIC | | Thu Mar 30 1989 20:29 | 16 |
|
"April 9th Coalition for Choice" is providing transportation as well:
Busses will leave Shoppers' World, Framingham, on Saturday Evening.
$35 per person, round trip (subsidies available). Call (508) 653-8560
or (508) 877-5456 for information and alternative transportation.
April 9th Coalition for Choice, PO Box 3313, Framingham, MA 01701
April 10th: you can join CfC to lobby on Capitol Hill for ERA and against
antiabortion legislation as well.
\VA
|
325.189 | Hurry,hurry,hurry...get your ticket here! | USEM::GILLARD | | Fri Mar 31 1989 11:26 | 13 |
| re: .188
There *are* still some (maybe eight or ten) spaces available on
the Coalition for Choice/South Middlesex NOW busses. We had run
out of space last week, but were able to find another bus! If you
are interested, though, you might want to send me MAIL right away.
I'm the lucky (!) person that's getting the checks, assigning the
seats, mailing the tickets, etc. for the Choice/NOW busses. As
of late last night, we did have eleven tickets left - not counting
the reservations in the mail.
Carolann
|
325.190 | Done! | MOSAIC::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Sun Apr 02 1989 23:54 | 23 |
| We just finished the banner and it looks *SWELL!* We reckon that
it took roughly 108 womanhours of effort over the last 2 weekends.
It is 3x9 feet, just barely offwhite with a technicolor (12 color)
rendition of our tshirt design at each end, and for text
WOMEN OF NOTE [in gold]
Connected With Each Other [in purple]
All Over The World---By Computer
in the center. The whole thing is applique work with about 50 yards
of black braid outline to highlight the colors. It can be carried
with either a horizontal bar thru the top, waist-high, or with a
vertical pole at each end overhead.
Two sewing machines are for the scrap heap, and we'll all have to have
a comprehensive course of psychotherapy before we'll be able to
resume a normal life. Anyone who doesn't positively *grovel* with
appreciation will be impaled with 1400 needles, wrapped in the
remaining braid, and dropped into Boston Harbor with curtain weights
on their ankles.
=maggie
|
325.191 | are we ready?, or what(-; | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | introspection unlimited | Mon Apr 03 1989 09:04 | 8 |
|
=maggie,
that banner sounds fantastic! much thanks to the women who contributed
*each one* of the womenhours.
~robin
|
325.192 | thank you, veddy veddy much! | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Mon Apr 03 1989 11:23 | 4 |
|
It sounds wonderful! 1,000,000 thanks for all the work!
CQ
|
325.193 | Consider me groveled!!! | TUT::SMITH | Passionate commitment to reasoned faith | Mon Apr 03 1989 11:49 | 1 |
|
|
325.194 | The parts I didn't work on look great. | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | I'll pick a white rose with Plantagenet. | Mon Apr 03 1989 12:01 | 3 |
| Ummm, I think that "WOM" and "Connected With" look a bit crooked.
Ann B.
|
325.195 | grovelgrovelgrovelgrovel | USEM::DONOVAN | | Mon Apr 03 1989 17:05 | 6 |
| Thanks Maggie and Co.
In Unity There is Strength! (is anyone getting tired of reading
that?)
Kate
|
325.196 | | CIVIC::JOHNSTON | OK, _why_ is it illegal? | Mon Apr 03 1989 17:19 | 6 |
| I extend many thanks now.
As I do a much better grovel in person, I'll save 'til Sunday for
full effect.
Ann
|
325.197 | BRAVA!! | SALEM::LUPACCHINO | There's a world beyond this room. | Mon Apr 03 1989 17:23 | 16 |
|
And here's part of the company as I know it:
Catherine T. Iannuzzo
Maggie Tarbet
Liz Augustine
Ann Broomhead
Marilyn Irlbacher
Naomi Kveen, Catherine's mother who acted as cook for the crew
and I'm not sure who else...but thanks, gyns, for the tremendous
effort. The unfinished banner looked pretty fine...I can hardly
wait to see the finished product on Sunday!
am
p.s. apologies to anyone I've left off list
|
325.198 | And *MANY* thanks to Catherine for hosting!! | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Mon Apr 03 1989 17:57 | 6 |
| Thanks, AM, we were all so punchy and giggly when I wrote the
announcement that nobody noticed that I left off the names! (You
gottem all) And Naomi also did chunks of the fitting and sewing, she
wasn't *just* a swell cook!
=maggie
|
325.199 | send pictures, please! | MORO::NEWELL_JO | Replies, they don't come easy | Mon Apr 03 1989 19:00 | 4 |
| Since I'm in California and won't be making the rally, would it
be too much to ask for a picture of the banner? It sounds wonderful!
Jodi-
|
325.200 | What to take in your back pack | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Tue Apr 04 1989 00:13 | 6 |
| I'm trying to plan what to take in re food and beverages for
the march, extra socks underwear, etc.. esp for bus riders..
ideas here or a sep note?
Bonnie
|
325.202 | | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Tue Apr 04 1989 09:56 | 21 |
| First off, I have some bad news, or what I think is bad news. National
NOW has decided to assemble delegations by affiliation, and not
by states. That is, first you'll have the bizillion NOW groups,
then Planned Parenthood, then NARAL, and so on. This means that
there is probably no way different delegations from the same state
will be near each other.
I'm really disappointed because I'm going with the NH NOW group
and will miss seeing all the beautiful Women of Note.
What it also means is that if the people from the bus want to march
in different delegations it is a logistical nightmare getting back
to the buses.
NOW's rational for this is to show the cross-organizational support.
But I think we lose out on this one.
I'll write another note about what to bring along with you to answer
note 200.
Judy
|
325.203 | Just bring everything from the sounds of it! | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Tue Apr 04 1989 10:08 | 43 |
| In NH NOW's confirmation letter, we told people to plan for the
following when going on the bus:
Weather
Here the rule is: Plan for Everything! Bring along clothing for
cool, hot, or rainy weather. You can leave what you don't need
on the bus.
Shoes and Hat
Wear comfortable shoes. We'll be standing and then walking for
several hours and you'll want to be comfortable. Bring along a
hat, just in case it is bright and sunny.
Food
Bring along a canteen or other container of water for the march.
There will be food to buy, but you may want to bring along your
own for convenience, cost, and personal taste.
Bus Ride
You may want a pillow and blanket to make sleeping a little more
possible.
Banners & Posters
If you want to bring them, certainly do. But you may want to rig
them up so you are wearing them. It can get tiring carrying so
much stuff.
Miscelleaneous Stuff
Bring along enough money to buy souveniers, buttons, food, or anything
else you might want. Also, bring along toiletries such as sunscreen,
asprin, and tampons to be prepared for any emergency.
I hope this helps!
See you at the march!
Judy
|
325.204 | Portable potables | VIA::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Tue Apr 04 1989 10:30 | 3 |
| Another good thing to stuff in the backpack is those boxed juices.
They travel well and don't weigh much. Raisins are a nice light
snack.
|
325.205 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Tue Apr 04 1989 10:43 | 10 |
| <--(.199)
Catherine had the foresight to recognise that we'd want pictures of the
construction, so we took a raft of them with her camera at various
stages of the construction, including the final one with three of us
including her daughter Ariane holding the finished banner up and
grinning like tired fools. As soon as they're developed, I'm quite
sure we can send them 'round.
=maggie
|
325.206 | | USCTR1::JWOLGAST | | Tue Apr 04 1989 13:02 | 8 |
| For those of us who aren't able to attend except in spirit,
to whom the banner sounds glorious, and who would love to be
able to share the day of those who go, I do hope some of the
march attendees will share the day with us and write of your
experiences.
Judy (whose non_DEC daughter IS going after reading these notes
which I printed out for her)
|
325.207 | One way to find out | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Tue Apr 04 1989 13:30 | 7 |
| Judy,
If you and any others who aren't able to attend the March can
make it to the party April 15th there will be marchers in attendance
who will be able to tell you about the day.
Bonnie
|
325.208 | Shirts, jeans, and dinner on Sat. | AMUN::LEACH | | Tue Apr 04 1989 13:39 | 13 |
| Kate,
Oh good - I'll be informal, too. Well, a pantsuit.
Looks like we'll have quite a group at the Hyatt -- 15 so far!
I heard from Lauri, who plans to bring 7 others, plus Barbara
Bazemore and Marty Jack. Can't wait to meet all these people.
I'll call the Hyatt on Thursday, when I expect we'll have a final
count.
Ann
|
325.209 | Banner - a wow! | AMUN::LEACH | | Tue Apr 04 1989 13:50 | 9 |
|
Maggie,
Banner sounds gorgeous! I HOPE I find you and it. Will be proud
to march under it.
Ann
|
325.210 | Would video camera capture the event? | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | introspection unlimited | Tue Apr 04 1989 13:53 | 12 |
|
Would a video diary be feasible at all, or is that to much hassle?
I know very little about trying to tape events such as this....would
you be able to hear what's going on from the tape?
It *sounds* like it might be a good idea for sharing the weekend
with those who weren't able to attend, but I'm not sure of the
logistics.
rla
|
325.211 | Judy - a way to meet the others | AMUN::LEACH | | Tue Apr 04 1989 13:56 | 10 |
| Judy,
Maybe you can join some of the Womannoters on Sat night a 8:00 for
dinner at the Hyatt in Washington (on the mall). Depends on
when you get to Washington, of course.
About 15 people so far will be meeting there. Can you make it?
Ann
|
325.212 | Video or 35mm?? | ACESMK::POIRIER | Aerobicize for Life! | Tue Apr 04 1989 14:00 | 13 |
| RE: 210
I've been toying with the idea of whether to bring my 35mm or my
video camera. I won't be able to tote or operate both obviously
but I can't decide which to bring. We have a small 8mm which we
brought on our vacation - its great - it fits in my fanny pack and
is really light and easy to use. But I just don't know if it will
detract from the whole experience of the march - or if the film
I take will be inspiring to others. Any ideas would be appreciated.
I've never been to this large of an event before, so someone else
may have some suggestions.
Suzanne
|
325.213 | Lots of ramblings here... | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Tue Apr 04 1989 14:31 | 31 |
| I think having a video cam is a great idea...it will be really easy
to use during the rally. During the march you may want to run ahead
and then tape the people that you were marching with.
A LOT of people will be taking photos (including me) and I'm sure
you can get copies of those. But a video would be so different.
You could also take some of the rally in Manchester, to get a local
perspective too. (Since I know you are taking the bus from there.)
Re: 211
Do you mean me, by Judy? If so, I hope to make it to the Hyatt
at some point. I need to get together with the president of NH
NOW, who is going there separately and is staying at the Hyatt Crystal
City. I'm staying at the Grand Hyatt Washington. Is that the Hyatt
you mean for dinner? Or do you mean the Hyatt Regency Washington?
Why don't they use meaningful names???
I may only make it there for a drink or something. At that point,
I probably will need one! (Hell, I need one now!) I'm still getting
lots of calls from people wanting to go on the bus, but we have
run out of time to organize things properly. I'm totally hyper
and driving everyone I know crazy! But, they are happy that things
are going well and know I'll be back to normal at some point. Who
knows what I'll be like on Saturday night?
Let me know which Hyatt it is and I'll decide whether to commit
to dinner.
judy
|
325.214 | To Judy and Ann | USEM::DONOVAN | | Tue Apr 04 1989 15:06 | 13 |
| Hey Judy,
Have a drink. ^ ^
C O O D
>
Kate \__/
|><|
P.S. Ann, please find out which Hyatt. I'll be there and I don't
even know which one.
|
325.215 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Tue Apr 04 1989 15:09 | 5 |
| I agree that the video would be the right one to bring! I think
there'll be a LOT of still cameras around (maybe even mine), but
damn' few vids.
That'd be nice to have to show at the party, wouldn't it?
|
325.216 | Video camera wins | ACESMK::POIRIER | Aerobicize for Life! | Tue Apr 04 1989 15:22 | 13 |
| Well, I guess I'll bring the video camera. You are probably right.
My friend is bringing her camera - the reason I couldn't decide
is 35mm is my first love - but I think the video could be quite
moving.
RE: 215 nice to have to show at the party,...
Unfortunately I have plans for the 15th but if anyone is going to
the party from the southern N.H. area I'd be happy to make a copy
of it and give it to them to bring. That's assuming that the party
giver (Dave?) has a VHS/BETA/or 8mm video player or a party goer
has an 8mm camera that they can bring and use as a VCR. Just let
me know which style to make the copy and who to give it to!!
|
325.217 | The Rally in San Francisco 2 Apr 89 | SKYLRK::OLSON | Doctor, give us some Tiger Bone. | Tue Apr 04 1989 16:48 | 74 |
| Before this past Sunday, I'd never done this kind of assembly-
march-rally before either; I'd hoped to write a detailed trip report
but there is absolutely no way, this week. So here are at least
a few short notes on the experience, offered here as food-for-thought
as we all get ready for Sunday.
San Francisco- Assembly was called for 11AM at Justin Herman Plaza
near the Embarcadero area. Due to daylight savings and half-a-dozen
other disasters I was mega-late so I stayed on BART one extra stop,
to join the march mid-route. I came up about 6 blocks into the
march at 12:45, after they'd stepped off at noon. I walked right
into the middle of the commotion! Hundreds of people on Market
street in every direction, banners, chants, hubbub galore. I was
totally impressed by the number of men in the march, there were
lots of us (several of the rally speakers commented on that too,
including Holly Near). I eventually realized I was ahead of the
NOW groups so drifted back through the march (actually just let
people march by me) and joined in with the Palo Alto Chapter and
talked to some folks there as we marched. We spent another hour
going another mile and a half, and between 2 and 2:30 finished
arriving at the Civic Center Plaza. We passed porta-pottys at
the end of the march, upon entering the rally plaza; the lines
didn't look bad, but there'd better be lots more in Washington
this weekend.
On the steps of City Hall, they had a rally platform and huge
loudspeakers. In the center of the plaza were information and
sign-up booths from numerous groups, including signups to defend
clinics against Operation Rescue (they're on the west coast this
month). I bought some buttons, they also had t-shirts and other
stuff for sale. Near the back end of the plaza (1/4 mile from the
front) they had concessions for pizza and sandwiches and other
foodstuffs. All over the plaza, in the (dry for now) fountains,
people were standing or sitting listening to the rally speakers.
Banners were tied up all over the place. We heard about a dozen
speakers, all of whom were accompanied by someone "signing" the
speeches for the hearing-impaired. The speakers included the heads
of several national organizations (incl Catholics for Legal Abortions
or something like that), 3 speakers from the California assembly
(incl the speaker, Willy Brown), women who'd had illegal abortions,
radical lesbians, a woman from Nicaragua whose speech was translated
from Spanish every sentence, and Holly Near. At the end of her
speech, she taught us a chorus and sang an a capella song which
resonated through the city, it was the place to be. The civic center
plaza was so jammed during the first hour of the rally that once
you'd moved into the crowd there was absolutely no way to move around
or go anywhere; I couldn't turn around without bumping people so
mostly folks just settled in and waited to hear, to applaud, to
feel the strength of the crowd.
I was carrying a backpack with 1 qt water, 1 can soda, an apple,
a sandwich, a paperback, and a clipboard. I didn't take any notes,
the experience was a bit too overhelming for me to just detach and
write about it. I only opened the backpack to pull out an overshirt
when it lightly drizzled on us, and later on to stuff it back in when
the sun came out. I drank some water, but nothing else. The paperback
was useful on BART (an hour from Fremont, and an hour back afterwards).
This weekend, I plan to carry 1 qt water again, and only dried fruit
and granola for snacks; a paperback (well, 2; one for me, one for
Bonnie!) and toiletries. I hope to stash my duffel luggage in a
locker at the airport before the march, because lugging it around
would be awful.
I was on my feet from 12:30 leaving BART until around 4:30 and my
legs got tired. This week, I think it will be twice as long, if
not more, and it will probably be grueling. Moral; plan to carry
as little as possible, and equip it with a shoulder strap.
Surprising news department: my father will be marching, too; he's
coming up from Raleigh NC with my stepmother. Way to go, Dad!
(Way to go, Nancy ;-)! I hope to see him for lunch Saturday, but
we've both agreed meeting Sunday will probably be impossible.
DougO
|
325.218 | clarification on .202 please | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Wed Apr 05 1989 02:18 | 9 |
|
re: .202
Judy, I'm not quite clear on what your response means as far as
WoN goes. Do you mean that we will be in with the NOW delegations,
but not necessarily near NH, even though I picked NH as the NOW
office I was "coordinating" with?
CQ
|
325.219 | Judy - Hyatt Regency on New Jersey Ave | AMUN::LEACH | | Wed Apr 05 1989 09:28 | 9 |
|
HI Judy,
It's the Hyatt Regency at 400 New Jersey Ave., NW.
Will let you know which dining room after I make reservations.
Ann
|
325.220 | Any last minute details? | NRPUR::NASON | | Wed Apr 05 1989 09:38 | 13 |
| Does anyone have anymore details on exactly where we are meeting?
I am heading down tomorrow morning, so I won't see any updates
after today. Any additional info you may have will be helpful.
As I understand it, we will be with the 'Other' organizations near
the back of the pack since we are not an official NOW delegation.
I'm really getting psyched...
Mandy
|
325.221 | With you in spirit | HANDY::MALLETT | Barking Spider Industries | Wed Apr 05 1989 12:36 | 7 |
| I won't be joining you all on Sunday but wanted you to know
that I'm sending best wishes and thoughts of support. May
the rally go well and may the weather be fine with the Cherry
trees in full blossom.
Steve
|
325.222 | Details on dinner at the Hyatt Sat Night | AMUN::LEACH | | Wed Apr 05 1989 14:03 | 23 |
|
To folks who've asked about Saturday night dinner:
Saturday night dinner in Washington:
So far, I've heard from 16 people. Made reservations for 16
for 8:00 p.m. Saturday night in the Park Promenade Dining Room
on the lobby level of the Hyatt Regency Hotel, 400 New Jersey Ave.,
NW.
I made the reservations under the name "Notes." (Clever, huh?)
These are the people who've said they plan to be there. (Let me
know if I missed anyone!)
Lauri and seven friends
Barbara Bazemore
Marty Jack
Kate and four friends
Kathryn Begley
Ann
|
325.223 | WoN is an official delegation | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Wed Apr 05 1989 16:53 | 26 |
|
-----> Women of Note is an official NOW delegation. <-----
After reading Mandy's response (it's a few back) I called NOW to see
if delegation positioning information was avaliable; I was told that
that information is not available, and will not be available, even
to facilitators, till Sunday morning. They haven't finished plotting
everyone on the grid yet, and they do not expect to finish till
sometime Saturday. The woman I spoke to said that I should tell my
delegation members (you, dear readers) the following:
Be at the Washington monument by 10 am Sunday morning. Facilitators
will be there, and they will be wearing lavendar sashes. They will
have a list of delegation names and their positions, and if you tell
them the name of your delegation, they will tell you where to go.
Does someone want to volunteer to be our delegation's facilitator?
I don't know what being a facilitator-for-a-specific-delegation
means, other than that you'll have to go to a facilitator's briefing
beforehand. If you are curious, maybe you can find out more by
calling national NOW at 202-331-0066. If someone volunteers, I'll
post the when and where info for the briefings. (I'll post that
info if anyone's interested, whether they feel ready to commit or
not...)
Christine
|
325.224 | | VAXRT::CANNOY | Convictions cause convicts. | Wed Apr 05 1989 17:46 | 2 |
|
Is the "official" name of our delegation "Women of Note"?
|
325.225 | Need more specific info as to where we will be.. | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Wed Apr 05 1989 19:52 | 11 |
| I'm still confused as to where we will be in the line up.
Will we be with the NOW groups towards the end as Women
of Note or as a separate group *after* the NOW groups
with the other "W"s?
The reason I ask is that my son will be Marching with Wesleyan
college. If we are with the "W"s after the NOW groups I should
be near enough to his group to have the time to grab a quick
hug or so while we are waiting to begin marching.
Bonnie
|
325.226 | | LEZAH::QUIRIY | | Wed Apr 05 1989 21:24 | 3 |
|
re: .224 Yes.
re: .225 Dunno. Judy?
|
325.227 | Note to Bonnie | USEM::DONOVAN | | Thu Apr 06 1989 10:14 | 7 |
| Bonnie,
To bad he isn't marching with us 8^(.
Kate
|
325.228 | | TOOK::HEFFERNAN | Am I having fun yet? | Thu Apr 06 1989 10:21 | 11 |
| The time is fast approaching! I just got some housing from the #
from NOW which is actually the Great Escape Travel Agency. They at
first said that the closest housing was 45 miles away but they got us
into the Holiday Inn in Bethesda, MD which looked pretty close from
the map. Anyways, we are heading down tomorrow night and getting
facilitors training Saturday and also staying Monday for political
lobbying.
Have a safe trip everyone,
john
|
325.229 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Thu Apr 06 1989 10:52 | 6 |
| Kate,
I'm just proud he's going! We talked about him joining me, but he'd
really rather be with his friends.
Bonnie
|
325.230 | | USCTR1::JWOLGAST | | Thu Apr 06 1989 13:15 | 14 |
| re: .207
Thanks, Bonnie, I'll read the party note and try to be
there April 15.
re: .211
Thanks also to you, Ann. If I could only be in DC
I'd love to join your group for dinner. Glad to see
you have a good-sized group at the Hyatt.
With you all in spirit on Sunday . . .
Judy
|
325.231 | an ex Decie | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Thu Apr 06 1989 16:17 | 5 |
| I just got mail via the bitnet from Bill Millois at Gauladet college.
He is going to be going to the rally also with a group from his
college.
Bonnie
|
325.232 | Best Wishes from the Great Northwest! | DECWET::JWHITE | God>Love>Blind>Ray Charles>God | Thu Apr 06 1989 16:30 | 5 |
|
Just wanted to add my support to those of you going this weekend. It
is a great thing you 'Women of Note' are doing and I am proud to know
you. I only wish the other Washington were not so far away so that I
could join you myself. Good Luck!
|
325.233 | (also sent as email; pls rx by email too! NOW!" | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Thu Apr 06 1989 16:30 | 101 |
|
Hi Gyns & Guys...
I'm going to be making party-type nametags for this march, and as my
bus will be leaving early tomorrow morning, I'm going to make the
tags NOW...in about 10 minutes, to be precise. The list below
represents input into the postscript program that prints the tags
(if you've been to a =wn= party, you know what the tags look like as
a result).
Please check the entries associated with you. What you see is what
you will get unless you tell me different: if there's a blank where
the name should go, that's what will be on the tag unless you supply
a name. If you'd really rather have "SO" than "spouse" or "spouse"
rather than "friend" in the relationship field, NOW is the time to
tell me that! If you aren't going to be marching with the rest of
us, tell me that, too, so that we can save printing a tag. If I've
got the number of friends or whatever wrong, tell me that so I can
correct it.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE RESPOND AT ONCE!
=maggie
NM%RAVEN1::AAGESEN ! Robin
NM%MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE ! Liz
NM%ICO::BACHELDER ! Lauri
!!!ICO::BACHELDER ! % friend of
NM%SAGE::BARRY ! Sandra
NM%VIA::BAZEMORE ! Barbara
NM%VAXRT::CANNOY ! Tamzen
NM%PISCES::CAPUANOC ! Cindy
NM%ARMORY::COBBB ! Barbara
NM%PHOOKA::DARROW ! Jennifer
!!!PHOOKA::DARROW ! % spouse of
NM%FDCV03::DONOVAN ! Kate
NM%SPIDER::FARLEY ! Lisa
NM%BRAT::FERRER ! Nancy
NM%MEMCL1::GAHL ! Norma
!!!MEMCL1::GAHL ! % friend of
NM%FDCV03::GILLARD ! Carolann
NM%BOOKIE::HALVORSON ! Jane
!!!BOOKIE::HALVORSON ! % friend of
!!!BOOKIE::HALVORSON ! % friend of
NM%OPHION::HAYNES ! Charles
NM%MOSAIC::IANNUZZO ! Catherine
!!!MOSAIC::IANNUZZO ! Naomi % mother of
!!!MOSAIC::IANNUZZO ! Pamela % mother of
NM%HAMSTR::IRLBACHER ! Marilyn
NM%DSSDEV::JACK ! Marty
NM%USMFG::PJEFFRIES ! Pat
NM%CIVIC::JOHNSTON ! Ann
NM%AUTHOR::KAHN ! Sarah
NM%ARMORY::KELLYB ! Betty
NM%TUT::LEACH ! Ann
NM%BUFFER::LEEDBERG ! Peggy
!!!BUFFER::LEEDBERG ! Lyril % friend of
!!!BUFFER::LEEDBERG ! Joann % friend of
!!!BUFFER::LEEDBERG ! Greta % friend of
NM%SALEM::LUPPACCHINO ! Ann Marie
NM%HACKIN::MACKIN ! Jim
NM%UCOUNT::MACY ! Annie
NM%TRADE::MURTHI ! Vikram
NM%NRPUR::NASON ! Mandy
!!!NRPUR::NASON ! % sister of
NM%SKYLRK::OLSON ! Doug
NM%CIMLAB::PHELAN ! Deb
!!!CIMLAB::PHELAN ! % friend of
!!!CIMLAB::PHELAN ! % friend of
NM%ACESMK::POIRIER ! Suzanne
NM%RAINBW::POLOMSKI ! Krystyna
NM%MU::PORTER ! Dave
NM%LYRIC::QUIRIY ! Christine
NM%WMOIS::B_REINKE ! Bonnie
NM%CURIE::ROCCO ! Muggsie
!!!CURIE::ROCCO ! % friend of
!!!CURIE::ROCCO ! % friend of
NM%XANADU::RODERICK ! Lisa
NM%BOEHM::SANKAR ! Arun
!!!BOEHM::SANKAR ! Bhjandarkar % friend of
!!!BOEHM::SANKAR ! Parikh % friend of
!!!BOEHM::SANKAR ! Stanfield % friend of
NM%DISCVR::SANKAR ! Gowry
NM%MARRHQ::SANTSCHI ! Sue
NM%MEMORY::SLATER ! Les
!!!MEMORY::SLATER ! % spouse of
!!!MEMORY::SLATER ! % son of
NM%LDYBUG::PARE ! Mary
NM%PSYCHE::SULLIVAN ! Justine
!!!PSYCHE::SULLIVAN ! Elise % friend of
NM%DECSIM::HALL ! Dale
NM%TRADE::SULLIVAN ! Karen
!!!TRADE::SULLIVAN ! % mother of
NM%RAINBO::TARBET ! =maggie
NM%VAXWRK::TCHEN ! Weimin
NM%TOPDOC::TURAJ ! Jenny
NM%VAXWRK::TURNER ! Larry
NM%CLOVE::VEILLEUX ! Lisa
NM%ULTRA::WITTENBERG ! David
!!!ULTRA::WITTENBERG ! Cynthia % SO of
NM%ULTRA::ZURKO ! Mez
|
325.234 | Not too late to join group for Sat nite dinner | TUT::LEACH | | Thu Apr 06 1989 17:54 | 26 |
|
Some room at the Sat. nite get-together at the Hyatt:
Unhappily, Lauri and her seven friends can't make dinner at the
Hyatt on Sat. nite. I'll hold the table till Friday, though, in
case others want to join in.
We've reserved a table for 16. With Lauri's change of plans, we
have 8 free seats. So, if you'd like to have dinner with friends
(us), send me mail at tut::leach and I'll add you to the list.
This isn't a formal bash or anything -- just Noters getting together
for a meal. Hyatt Regency, 400 New Jersey Ave. NW, Promenade Plaza
dining room on lobby level (the moderate priced one). 8:00 p.m.
See you!
PS: We'll miss you, Lauri. Hope to see you during the march.
Ann
|
325.235 | I finally get time to answer... | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Thu Apr 06 1989 19:33 | 19 |
| Sorry I'm late with these replies...between the march and my job
I've been more than busy! But today things are letting up since
we sold the last ticket.
I have no idea how NOW is organizing the groups. If they go
alphabetically by names then Women of Note and Wellsley may be
together. If they group all the colleges together, then you may
not. But, you could ask where Wellsley college is assembling and
try to find him and then get back to where Women of Note are. I
would think that would be possible in the hour or so we'll be
assembling.
I don't want to commit to making the dinner, since I will need to
do some last minute tasks. But I'll try to get there for
dessert/drinks/or whatever.
Have fun EVERYONE! I think this will be wonderful!
judy
|
325.236 | :-) | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Thu Apr 06 1989 21:15 | 9 |
| Thanks Judy,
I just called my son and told him I'd stay put and he could
ask a facilitator where I'd be.
I was interested that you read Wesleyan as Wellsley! :-) Wellsley
like my alma mater Mount Holyoke is still a womens college.
Bonnie
|
325.237 | thurs weather update for sunday | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Thu Apr 06 1989 23:39 | 8 |
| This is a more or less long range weather report for Washington
for Sunday.
I talked to my br-in-law by phone..
cold and wet but no snow forcast..
Bonnie
|
325.238 | (-; | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | introspection unlimited | Fri Apr 07 1989 09:25 | 6 |
| re .237 Bonnie,
I heard the same info this morning.....does that mean we should
pack a shower curtain or two to march under?
~robin
|
325.239 | If you hurry, you can still go... | HBO::VELEZ | In search of the ultimate answer .... | Fri Apr 07 1989 12:16 | 16 |
|
Hello!
I don't know how many of you might be interested in this but...
If any of you are planning to march in Washington this sunday and
have found no way of getting there there will be busses leaving from
Worcrester. I got a ticket from Worcester NOW (508)755-9564 and was
told that there are still tickets available. The tickets cost $50 for
a round trip on a greyhound bus. The bus will leave from Worcester's
Unitarian Universalist Church at 11:00 pm. Saturday. They will be back
by 3:00 am. Sunday. Anyone interested please get in contact with them.
I hope to see you people at the march.
Iv�n.
|
325.240 | (508)755-3645 | THRILL::WILS | Joris Wils | Fri Apr 07 1989 15:05 | 1 |
| I think the number for the Worcester NOW is (508)755-3645.
|
325.241 | update on the weather | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Fri Apr 07 1989 22:08 | 7 |
| This morning I talked to my mom on the phone. She said the weather
for cast for the area is 40-50 degrees, cloudy and occasional
showers.
For those of you who haven't left yet...pack rain gear.
Bonnie
|
325.242 | | BUSY::KLEINBERGER | Disic Vita Lux Hominum | Fri Apr 07 1989 22:30 | 4 |
| So, for all that went.... how was it?
And did you realize how DEAD the net is with all of you gone?????
:-)
|
325.243 | Thank you, at least 600,000 times! | GALACH::CONLON | | Mon Apr 10 1989 03:45 | 15 |
|
Thanks 600,000 times to the people who participated in the
March. The vision of so many beautiful, noble women and our
supporters was a sight I shall never forget (even though I
only saw it on the news coverage.)
I did get to hear some of the speakers (on C-SPAN) and they
were wonderful, too.
Please, please, please share your experiences with us, and
thank you from the bottom of my heart for being there for
those of us who couldn't make it this time around.
You have given me hope for our future!
|
325.244 | FYI - World-Wide Coverage | SHIRE::BIZE | La femme est l'avenir de l'homme | Mon Apr 10 1989 04:39 | 14 |
| I thought you'd like to know that the march was covered both on
the Swiss and on the French TV News. It was even the first item
presented in the French 8:00 p.m. news (the most complete news bulletin
of the day), even before the latest imbroglio in French politics
(and that usually gets TOP attention!).
The TV reporter mentioned 200'000 people "expected". Because of
the time difference, the march was still going on at the time of
the newscast. Can anybody in the US give a number?
The event came through on TV in a very positive way, and I hope
all went well for those of you who were there.
Joana
|
325.245 | On the news 'Down-Under' too! | GIDDAY::WALES | David from Down-under | Mon Apr 10 1989 07:28 | 10 |
| G'Day All,
The march was also covered by Australian news coverage. It
was a HUGE event. Congratulations to all who attended and it will
be interesting to see if anybody takes any notice of the events
that took place.
David.
|
325.246 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Mon Apr 10 1989 08:30 | 15 |
|
It was on the British Channel 4 news this morning. (A sort of
heavyweight breakfast TV). Main impression was of a several times
repeated comparison with turn of the century suffragettes.
The forthcoming Supreme Court hearing was mentioned.
I'll watch again tonight to see if it really was as skewed as I
think it was looking back on it. (With the benefit of 3 hours of
digesting my morning meal I have the distinct impression of a lot
of people dressed in white, waving banners and trying to interfere
with the democratic process of having the constitution interpretted
by unbiassed judges - but that could be curry giving me indigestion).
/. Ian .\
|
325.247 | Just got back! | ACESMK::POIRIER | Aerobicize for Life! | Mon Apr 10 1989 09:39 | 13 |
| Just got back from the rally! It was pretty incredible to be there
amongst so many people that felt the same way I do! The speakers
were fantastic and brought up a lot of good issues/points (better
to be discussed in onte 183). I've never been involved in a rally
before, but I would do it again in a second.
Estimates of 600,000 people - just phenominal. I took some video
tape if anyone is interested, but you will probably see more on
the news than I got on film ( 6 minutes ).
I'll write more letter when my brain doesn't feel so mushy.
Suzanne
|
325.249 | | NEXUS::CONLON | | Mon Apr 10 1989 12:22 | 18 |
| This topic seems like the perfect place to relate experiences
surrounding the March (since we watched you all make your plans
to go right here!)
Please tell us what it was like (anything and/or everything
you feel like relaying!)
Did you hear the speakers clearly? I watched most of it on
C-SPAN, and it was inspiring (even from the vantage of my
own home.) In person, it must have been unbelievably moving!
Do you remember the chant "Free Barbara Bush!" :) If no one
else remembers, I'll explain where that one came from.
Please tell us anything you can (when you catch your breaths
and feel ready, of course!)
Bless you all!!!
|
325.250 | A few more details | ACESMK::POIRIER | Aerobicize for Life! | Mon Apr 10 1989 12:48 | 70 |
| Now that I'm a little more coherent, after a shower, I'll give a few
more details of the trip.
I went down with NH NOW. Everyone gathered in a parking lot in
Manchester. Channel 9 news was there interviewing. Everyone was
excited and most were wearing white!! Some of the banners were
beautiful.
The bus ride down was long but we were all pretty excited. Several
times along the way we ran into convoys of busses coming from NJ, NY,
Vermont and MA. The poor rest stops around Maryland couldn't handle
all of the busses. The NOW rep on my bus said that because the media
down played the whole event, none of the areas rest stops were prepared
to be invaded. And thats what it was, an invasion of people dressed in
white!!!
As I had said in another note, I was suprised by the variety of people
at this march, men and women, mothers and fathers, husbands and wives,
grandmothers with their daughters and grandchildren. Over 500 colleges
were represented as well as several highschools (and they said this was
a generation who didn't care!!). Priests and nuns were there for
Catholics for a choice. Maryland Medical University was there for
Med students for choice. The age spread was what really amazed
me, from infant to 80's were all there. Every state was represented,
even alaska. There were delegations from several countries - I met one
woman that came for the rally from Manchester, England! (She got a kick
out of it when I told her we came down from Manchester, NH).
We all assembled around the Washington Monument - there was a sea of
people - a sight to behold! Several people from congress spoke to tell
us of their support. Peter, Paul and Mary were there and sang several
songs - everyone joined in, especially for the song "If I had a bell,
I'd ring it in the morning...." And then the march began. It was very
slow moving at first but the air was filled with chants for pro-choice
support. Walking down Constitution Ave, the sidewalks were filled with
supporters, picking up our chants as we walked by. My friend and I
lost NH NOW and ended up walking with Wisconsin (don't ask me how???).
They had two women drummers that beated out a cadence that matched our
chanting. As we passed the court building, the stairs were filled with
a cheering crowd. Finally we could see the capitol building and our
group started chanting "Here we come George, Here we come! etc."
Other catchy chants included "2, 4, 6, 8, separte church and state!"
"Keep your laws off my body, keep your church off my state!"
When we finally made it there we heard Whoopi Goldberg, Jesse Jackson,
Morgan Fairchild, Cybill Shepard, Susan Sarandon and umpteen more that
I cannot remember. They announced how they were still marching all the
way from the monument, so we stretched from the Capitol to the
monument. Yes we did start chanting "FREE BARBARA BUSH!" The speaker
told us of how Barbara use to be a supporter of pro-choice and that she
suggested that Barbara have a little talk with her husband:-)
The organizers estimated 600,000 attendees - the police said around
300,000. They did try to get an official count, by passing around a
petition for everyone who attended to sign. ABC news said it was the
largest rally since the height of the Vietnam War.
I hope the country, the president and the congress heard us loud and
clear. You certainly couldn't miss us, we were everywhere, in spirit
and in body!!
Having been a child in the 60's and parents that were unactive in
rallies and such, this was my first rally in D.C. It was incredible!
Suzanne
P.S. I looked for the women of note at section O6 so I could meet you all
- but I could not find you. Sorry I missed you - hope you had lots of fun.
|
325.251 | In Unity There is Strength | USEM::DONOVAN | | Mon Apr 10 1989 14:21 | 35 |
|
I was in awe. For the first time ever I really felt like I was a part
of something bigger, more powerful. It was truly invigorating.
The pre-rally rally at the Hyatt Regency was great. My friend Betty
and I spotted the party without ever having seen 1 of them. They
had that "Deccie look".- half teckie, half yuppie. Only kidding.
My mind was racing while my legs felt like jello. The longer I stayed
the more I was convinced that I belonged here.
We met the Women of Note in the O6 area. No one looked liked I'd
imagined except for Ann Leach. Maggie was supposed to be short and
dark haired. Bonnie was supposed to be tall and blond.
The speakers were powerful. Jesse Jackson, Lilly Tomlin and Sen.
Alan Cranston (What a combination!) did a great job among many others.
We women are an orderly lot. No violence, no littering, no alcohol
was seen. The typical marcher was rich,poor,black,white,brown,straight,
gay,male,female,young,old. Typical women of note bear a strong
resemblance to the typical marcher except that none of us are rich.8^)
This was the biggest woman's rights rally ever- it was the biggest
march since Vietnam. Too long has the sleeping giant lay dormant.
Never in the history of America has a civil right been granted and
then revoked. Every baby born has a right to be wanted. Unfortunately,
this is not the end of the struggle. We must make the message known:
"PRO-CHOICE IS PRO-LIFE".
Thanks for the support, In Unity there is -fill in the blank-
Kate
|
325.252 | Exhilerated, overwhelmed, joyful, and tired | FOOZLE::WHITE | Natural Woman | Mon Apr 10 1989 14:56 | 51 |
| I am still in awe, not to mention half-awake. I took the
bus from Worcester, leaving at 11:00 pm Saturday, arriving
with little sleeo at 8:30 am Sunday. Left 7:30 pm Sunday,
arrived at my house 5:15 am today, and I had to teach a
course at 9:00.
About 80 Womannoters marched with the totally awesome banner.
We gathered lots of attention, and were photographed many
times, including by Ms Magazine. Catherine's outfit was
wonderful. Peggy and I also wore long white dresses and
white hats tied on with scarves. Many others were all in
summer white, in spite of cold winds. During the long, slow
march, we occasionally danced holding hands in front of the
banner.
I am old enought to remember the marches of the sixties. The
greatest differences to me were the cheerfulness of the crowd
and the diverse ages and background of the marchers. Most of
the chants were positive, in the sense of stating what we
believed/ wanted, rather than insulting the opponents. For
example, when we passed a small group of Pro-life picketers
with signs, the marchers chanted "CHOICE . . . CHOICE . . .
CHOICE" or " What do we want? CHOICE! When do we want
it? NOW!" I heard very few, if any, insults. Very different
from my memories of civil rights demonstrations and anti-war
demonstrations 20-25 years ago. The police were cheerful and
helpful, and not highly visible, except where there were
anti-march demonstrators.
Some signs I remember: "Another priest for choice" "Menopausal
women nostalgic for choice" "Pregnant by choice" "A Womb of
My Own". The marchers gave a huge cheer as we passed a small
group on the sidewalk with a sign "Mormons for Choice". A chant:
"2, 4, 6, 8, we're the ones who ovulate".
Our bus included a reporter from the Worcester Telegram, who was
doing a story on the people going to the march. Our bus included
women who had never been to a demonstration before in their lives,
women who had been active in the sixties but not since then,
students, lesbians who have been active in gay issues, some men
with their SOs, and men going on their own, children, housewives,
professional women,.. a huge variety. I'm planning to buy the
paper and will save the article if it is interesting.
The Womannoter group did not arrive at the Capitol until about
2:30 (vague memory) - we got to hear most of Jesse Jackson and
the following speeches. There is no way to describe the feeling
of being one with 600,000 committed people. I won't come down
for days. Prepare to hear about nothing else at the party!!!
Pat
|
325.253 | Just like Xmas, all that planning & it's over! | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Mon Apr 10 1989 16:21 | 62 |
| What a fantastic experience! We arrived in D.C. on Saturday morning,
around 10:00. Our first hint that the weekend was going to be even
better than we hoped was that our room was number 666.
We spent that day acting like tourists. We went to the Women's
Art Museum, which was really nice. An incredible building with
lots of good stuff in it. And it was the first time that weekend
that we felt the empowering feeling of being surrounded by feminists.
But it sure wasn't the last!
One interesting note, our hotel was housing all of the candidates
for Cherry Blossom Princess. So we got to see all these women running
around with Pink Sashes. It was interesting to note the different
reason for our visit! I sure hope that some of them managed to
stay for the march.
On Sunday we took the metro at 9:00 and it was already filling
up with people with signs all dressed in white. The spirit of
comradery that filled the trains was wonderful. Everyone was asking
each other where they were from and it felt so comfortable and
comforting.
I didn't get to see the banner, unfortunately. Let's hope we all
see it in Ms.!!! Wouldn't that be great?
The march itself was just an awesome experience. And like someone
said earlier, it was so positive. No name calling or insults from
our side. (Although I did see some interesting anti-choice signs.
One in particular: Men who support women's rights should F***
themselves. I'm not quite sure I understand it, since most women
I know feel the other way. I did get a picture of this one. I
also noticed an elderly woman holding a poster that I couldn't
make out in one hand, and a cross in another. But she was totally
silent and harmless. But riveting, none the less.)
Unfortunately, I got to the end of the march as Jesse Jackson was
finishing speaking. At that point, I had stood from 9:00 to 3:30
and I was pretty much dead. We sat and listened to the speeches
until 4:15 or so. It is the first event that I can ever remember
where I couldn't even get close enough to figure out where the speakers
were! (I saw C-SPAN last night and figured it out.)
NOW is selling a $20 video of the day. If you want I can post the
info here. I'm sure NH NOW will buy one. Our next Nashua meeting
is dedicated to talking about the march and showing pictures. I
hope Suzanne will bring along her 6 minutes of film.
A few more interesting tidbits...
We thought it appropriate when we got a woman cab driver to take
us to the airport last night! It sort of made the end of the trip
so rounded out. And then on the shuttle at the airport last
night we sat across from Veronica Hamel! She told us that she called
CNN to tell them they were off in their counts. She was the only
celebrity that I saw in the flesh, since I never got to see them
on the speaker's platform.
Just an amazing, wonderful, fantastic, powerful weekend.
I think I have post-march blues! :-)
judy
|
325.254 | | MEMORY::SLATER | | Mon Apr 10 1989 16:33 | 13 |
| re .253 (Judy)
> (Although I did see some interesting anti-choice signs.
> One in particular: Men who support women's rights should F***
> themselves. I'm not quite sure I understand it, since most women
> I know feel the other way.
I am not sure it was the same sign, and I was not paying close
attention, but... I thought it was pro-choice and it said something
to the effect that "men who *DON'T* support a wonan's right to
choose should go F*** themselves."
Les
|
325.255 | The March may be over, but there's plenty left to do! | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | introspection unlimited | Mon Apr 10 1989 16:38 | 48 |
|
Although I am still numb from the intense passion displayed at yesterdays
march for women's reproductive rights, I feel compelled to write about some
of this experience. Wow, how to begin.........
Myself and another Deccie hit the Metro about 10 am to travel to the Mall
area. Each stop we made along the way had people pouring in for
transportation to the same destination. The awesome scale of this event hit
us as we stepped off the Metro ready to bound up the steps and rush over to
find the WoN delegation, when we found we had barely enough space to step
off the train. After 15 minutes of slowly moving towards the exits, the
Metro folks decided they would have to just open the gates to move the
masses instead of requiring the usual ticket processing.
We made it to the Washington monument grounds where a sea of humanity
already had formed. After signing the official "attendance sheets" and
getting the grid location of our delegation we proceeded. We found O6
easily, but stumbled around for a few minutes looking for WoN. Arriving
just before the banner made it a little difficult for us to find the group
whom we had never met (thanks Peggy, our delima was shortlived when we
spotted your WoN t-shirt(-:). Finally getting a chance to meet some of the
wn'ers was one of the highlights of this trip!, and the banner was by far
the best one there!(-;.
The march was slow getting started. I mean, how *do* you move 600,000+
people if not a little bit at a time. The wait didn't particularly bother
me, because there was someone new to meet every way you turned. The
previous descriptions of the diversity of the marchers are very fitting.
Every culture, minority, and special interest group who cares about women's
freedom of choice was well represented. Getting somewhat impatient by 2 pm,
I started marching up thru the droves of people to the after march rally at
the Capitol. It took from noon to about 3:00 to get everyone moved from the
start site to the rally, so I sat on a curb nearby listening to the
speakers and waiting for the marchers to work their way up to the Capitol.
Sitting there listening, and watching the individual expressions of each
person's passion for this cause was a terrifically moving experience for
me. One that I didn't want to have come to an end. For those of you who
wanted to attend but couldn't, your presence was truely felt! In my
opinion, the majority of American voices were finally heard this Sunday
past.
~robin
p.s. all of my preconceived mental pictures of the individual wn'ers
present was different than the reality. it was alot of fun finally
having a face to match to the NODE::NAME (-:
|
325.256 | Once again, with feeling | SKYLRK::OLSON | Doctor, give us some Tiger Bone. | Mon Apr 10 1989 16:45 | 55 |
| Kate's right, nobody's physical appearance matched expectations...
but it only took a few conversations to convince me I was in the
right place! The morning was mostly sunny, but the wind blew a
bunch of clouds in eventually and several of us had the "choice"
of remaining uncovered (to let our white clothing speak out for
us) and freezing, or putting on jackets...smart people had white
sweatshirts and jackets along.
Watching the grounds of the Washington Monument fill in with over
half-a-million people in a few hours was an amazing experience all
by itself. Assembly took hours, and over a dozen =wn=rs side-tripped
down to the Vietnam Memorial...many others did too. Our banner was
visible 10 minutes before it actually reached us, we saw this
amazingly bright, broad banner with our symbol while it was still
atop the hill, coming down from the monument towards our assembly
area (Suzanne P, sorry we missed you!). With it arrived many more
womannoters and nametags...we stood in the sun and the wind, talking,
watching, feeling the day. Our assembly point was quite a long
way off from the rally stage; the area was carpeted with people.
I don't actually remember hearing any of the morning speakers or
musicians, there were too many people to talk to instead of listening.
Eventually noon came and went, and the march had started; we sort
of meandered in fits and starts over the grass and puddles (no Tamzen,
I decided not to use the slug analogy) until we reached the street.
For awhile we didn't move, standing seemingly dead-last in the order
of march; then one of our more dynamic members lead us a sinuous
path through the crowd up into the middle of things, and we were
off. Something about marching through the streets of Washington,
with all of those massive ancient government buildings and wide
boulevards, with a huge crowd of peaceful, lawful demonstrators,
felt pretty good. In addition to cheering the Mormons For Choice,
we also gave a rousing cheer to the "Yankee Fan for Choice" perched
upon the traffic signal. If I may make the comparison, marching
with 600K is 1) much slower 2) much more crowded and 3) much more
emotional, than marching with 25K (the 2-Apr SF march estimate).
When we passed the DoJ building, some protesters had taped the word
"In" before the J: Department of InJustice. Another cheer. The
banners and signs were amazing; some of my favorites were-
"President Bush- Adopt an unwanted child, not a puppy" and "Uppity
Women Unite For Choice".
We reached the Capitol during Jesse Jackson's speech...and eventually
wormed our way off to the side were we could sit down yet still
hear the speakers. Kate identified Lily Tomlin's voice, and I believe
she (Ms Tomlin) was the one who started the "Free Barbara Bush" chant.
I remember Bella Abzug being introduced, but none of the other names
stuck with me.
Another amazing march, being there was wonderful, sharing it with
so many =wn=rs was the icing on the cake. Hope I don't have to
wait another year to see you all again...
DougO
|
325.257 | thanks! | CURIE::ASBURY | | Mon Apr 10 1989 17:09 | 8 |
| re: .250-.255
Thank you, thank you, thank you, all of you who wrote of your
experiences in DC this weekend. I am so moved by your descriptions,
I can't even tell you. (Goosebumps!)
-Amy.
|
325.258 | Bravo to you all! Encore! | NEXUS::CONLON | | Mon Apr 10 1989 17:22 | 13 |
| Yes, thanks from me, too!! (Encore, encore!!!)
Do any of you remember any more of the ideas presented by the
speakers? I was listening so intently (and cheered along with
the crowd on a *number* of occasions,) but it all went by so
quickly that I can't remember many of the specifics (other than
the fact that the whole thing made me feel more hopeful than I've
felt about Women's Rights in at least a decade!)
It was quite a day for *more* than the 600,000 who actually
went. (I've still got goosebumps myself.)
More, more, more (information,) please -- when you get the chance.
|
325.259 | | MEMORY::SLATER | | Mon Apr 10 1989 17:38 | 19 |
| I did not catch too many of the speeches but I caught this in today's
Boston Globe.
"Ira Glasser, executive director of the American Civil Liberties
Union, told the demonstrators: `This weekend marks a shift from
a struggle in the courts to a struggle in the streets. Rights don't
come from courts. They come from political struggle.'"
How many people there or watching this on TV or radio, or were at
one of the bus service areas along the east coast could think that
the Supreme Court, or Mr. Bush could not hear these voices?
How could anybody now believe that pro-choice is a radical minority
position? Like someone said in an earlier note, this *is* the majority.
I do remember someone saying that this is now a test of the Supreme
Court. That *we* know what our rights are, does the court?
Les
|
325.260 | and the banner was a work of art! | HACKIN::MACKIN | Question Reality | Mon Apr 10 1989 20:38 | 15 |
| Molly Yard, president of NOW, said during the early morning rally that
the press was probably going to distort the actual numbers of people
showing up and that's why they had sign-in sheets going around all
day long. On the trip home one radio station talked about "tens of
thousands of people" (get real!) or the more common number 300,000
people. I'm really pissed, because that 300K number was an estimate
from the park service from around 1-2:00 in the afternoon. By 3:00 I
understand that they had over 600,000 signatures. One radio station
in the late afternoon said that over 800,000 people might have showed up.
Has an official number been released from NOW yet?
BTW, if we could get 600,000 people to D.C. under the threat of a
Supreme Court decision and with minimal publicity, imagine what we
could do if people really got galvanized? As Ms. Yard said, we are
no longer a silent majority. And we do vote.
|
325.261 | ?? | TUT::SMITH | Passionate commitment to reasoned faith | Mon Apr 10 1989 21:39 | 4 |
| *WHY* would the press want/need to distort the numbers? What would
they possibly have to gain by doing that? (I can more easily under-
stand what the sponsors would have to gain by overestimating --
but I'm *VERY* impressed even if it was only 300,000!)
|
325.262 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Tue Apr 11 1989 04:25 | 19 |
|
� *WHY* would the press want/need to distort the numbers?
hypothesis:-
A certain large segment of the US press has been becoming increasingly
vitriolic about what it sees as an unacceptably conservative bias
in the Supreme Court. This march is seen as a march against that
bias.
The papers therefore wish to inflate the numbers attending to make
it seem that their stance is that of a large proportion of the public.
Since the police traditionally minimise the size of protest rallies,
and the organisers over-estimate it, I would hazard a guess that
the size of the rally was between 300kp and 600kp [1kp = 1 thousand
people].
/. Ian .\
|
325.263 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Tue Apr 11 1989 08:36 | 22 |
| Both the print and electronic press rely, overwhelmingly, on
government spokespeople for virtually all of the "news" that they
provide to us. And government spokespeople are not so much
interested in the truth as in trying to convince people that
the government is doing a great job.
We're told that US troops landed in Grenada to rescue medical
students because the State Department said it's true; we're told
that 24,317 Viet Cong, 772 ARVNs, and 4 Americans were killed this
week because the Defense Department says it's true; and we're told
that 300,000 (or maybe 100,000) people marched in Washington
because the national Park Service says it's true. The government
will always underestimate the size of any protest, on the theory
that a larger protest shows a greater level of dissatisfaction
with the current administration. (Of course, it's also reasonable
to take for granted that those who sponsor a protest will
overestimate their numbers.)
And, no, this past weekend's outing on the lawn seems far removed
from the passion and fervor of the protests in '66-'72.
--Mr Topaz
|
325.264 | A superficial possibility | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | I'll pick a white rose with Plantagenet. | Tue Apr 11 1989 10:12 | 8 |
| Why?
Perhaps because the press *predicted* a turnout of a quarter of
a million people, and it sounds much better to be off by only
20% than to be off by more than a factor of two. No one likes
to look like a jerk.
Ann B.
|
325.265 | Media misprepresentation | ACESMK::POIRIER | Aerobicize for Life! | Tue Apr 11 1989 10:32 | 12 |
| On Channel 5 news Saturday night, a Boston NOW rep was being
interviewed. The reporter asked her how many people they expected.
She told him between 250K and 500K. He turned to the camera and
said something like "Up to 250K people will be there tomorrow in
one of the largest women's rights rallies in history!" He totally
ignored her statement and made up his own.
The crowd was huge at the Washington monument - but we were told
later that thousands more had joined us as we walked down the street
to the Capitol.
Suzanne
|
325.266 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Tue Apr 11 1989 11:51 | 61 |
| I don't know how many people we had, but I do know that when we were
looking for the "O6" marker as our rallying point, all we could see
were people, _everywhere_, they stretched as far as the eye could see
in all directions. I could easily believe the 600K figure, and
wouldn't be at all surprised if the 800K one we heard on the radio
during the march were true.
The 9 of us who carried the banner down had kind of an exciting time on
the trip: we had signs in the windows of the van inviting other
marchers to honk when they went by and several did. Plus once when we
tanked up, the guy at the gas station asked what it was all about
because he'd had cars full of women coming thru all night! It was
wonderful! The conclusion to the trip down wasn't so swell though: we
were rear-ended by a drunk at 11 pm about 25 miles from DC and so we
never got to the motel til 1 am.
All of us visited the 'Nam memorial on Saturday; it was a deeply
emotional experience for all of us, I can feel tears coming to my eyes
again as I'm typing now. What a terrible, horrible waste that was.
Brothers, husbands, sons, fathers, all dead for nothing. If you've
never gone, go. You'll never forget it.
Mez, Jenny, and I went on to the Women's Museum too on Saturday, it was
beautiful! It was a good antidote to the sadness of the wall, tho
there were a couple of pieces that were *very* moving expressions of
sadness and loss too, they brought tears to my eyes. But overall it
was a joyful experience, wonderful to see some of what women have done
over the centuries.
Sunday morning our motel just seemed to explode into women dressed in
white, it was though it just burst! And then we moved to the subway
and just brought it too its knees, every car was jammed, the station
was jammed, and as Robin(?) said they had to switch off the oubound
ticket machines because of the crowd.
It was so lovely to finally see the "O6" and find our mob, our
community fielded over 80 people, 78 of whom marched under our banner
(which was unquestionably the best and most-photographed banner in the
march; as Pat(?) says, we may even show up in Ms magazine). And
I got to meet a lot of our members who until Sunday were just names
and personalities, but no faces...it was beautiful.
The march was very moving, just curb-to-curb people forever. There was
a women's chorus singing ("Never Turning Back", "Bread And Roses"),
chants, and a general feeling that this is _it_, we will not have the
clock turned back. The number of marchers was even more encouraging
because this march really wasn't well-publicised, if Kate hadn't begun
this string we might never have learnt of it! Some of us have friends
living in the DC area who hadn't heard of it right up til last week!
After the march we went back and tried to find unbiased tv coverage,
finally hitting 52 where CSPAN was doing solid coverage of the speakers
at the rally. They probably did a lot of coverage of the march as
such, too, but we just found the channel too late which was a bummer.
I was so psyched, we drove down but after meeting all the beautiful
members of our community and marching in such solidarity with so many
other people, I was ready to *fly* back...carrying our van!
=maggie
|
325.267 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Tue Apr 11 1989 11:53 | 7 |
| I heard unofficially that there were 5000 buses. at 45 people/bus,
that gives 225,000 people who came by bus. That fits with a total
crowd of 500,000, and makes 300,000 a ridiculous underestimate.
Was NOW's 600,000 number taken from the count sheets? If so, I
believe it, as they made a realeffort to get an accurate count.
--David
|
325.268 | | MEMORY::SLATER | | Tue Apr 11 1989 12:51 | 15 |
| I have been to many, many demonstrations in Wahsington. This was
one of the bigger ones. I overheard a discussion of several people
that were veterans of organizing anti-war demonstrations of the
late 60s, early 60s. They were certain that 600,000 was not an inflated
number. One person said that it could have been as high as a million.
These are not easy things to do. Part of the estimation is based
on past experience. My estimate at the Washington Monument at about
11:30 was that there were at least 200,000 there. I also knew that
more were and would be coming in to the assembly area. There is
also a great tendency for people to go to the rally point before the
march gets there. All things considered (not the NPR program), I
thought that it would easily exceed half a mil.
Les
|
325.269 | It's all a numbers game | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Tue Apr 11 1989 12:52 | 9 |
| And, just to complicate things, NOW deliberately downplayed the
numbers. They wanted there to be many more than they initially
told the press, otherwise, they would hear about the "poor" turnout.
At the last march, NOW estimated that there were 250,000 people,
and the press stated that there were 125,000. I think it's just
a game they play.
judy
|
325.270 | Let's do lunch | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Tue Apr 11 1989 13:25 | 17 |
| I just reserved the Euler conference room for May 2, from 11:00
to 1:00. If you went to the march and want to talk about it, come
on to ZKO2-2/R-A. If you were there in spirit and want to talk with
people about it, come too.
Bring along anything march related--for example, photos, newspaper
clippings, posters, banners, tee-shirts, buttons, videos, and anything
else that I may have missed. (Of course, if there is anyone who
can bring the Women of Note banner, that would be the highlight.)
I know this isn't fair to the greater community, but I'm running
into so many people here at ZK that want to get together, I decided
to do this here.
judy
Just show up, anytime between 11:00 and 1:00 on May 2, and bring
your lunch.
|
325.271 | | BOLT::MINOW | Who will can the anchovies? | Tue Apr 11 1989 14:25 | 6 |
| "Tens of thousands" may be a quote from Mike Wallace on 60 Minutes Sunday
night. In their defense, it might be noted that they do pre-tape the show
(possibly days in advance). I suspect they will publish a retraction
next week.
Martin.
|
325.272 | One, two, three, many... | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck - DECnet-VAX | Tue Apr 11 1989 19:24 | 4 |
| What retraction? Tens of thousands is accurate. Just as the national deficit can
accurately be described as "just pennies a day".
He didn't say how *many* tens of thousands. Maybe two tens; maybe sixty...
|
325.273 | trip report | TOOK::HEFFERNAN | Am I having fun yet? | Tue Apr 11 1989 22:56 | 148 |
|
Well, I am just getting back to normal after getting home today.
I left for Simon's Rock College where Cate goes to school on Friday
and took two people down to the march. I got to the hotel at 4:00
:-(.
Even Saturday morning, there were tons of pro-choice folks around the
hotel in Bethesda. We went to facilitator training on Saturday and
heard all the scoop on how things work. The NOW people also started
to get all the facitators pumped up. A couple of things they stressed
where that the march was just the beginning; that a political army was
being formed. We also learned what to do in certain difficult
situation if the opposition tried certain tactics like lying in front
of the march or throwing fetuses or red paint on the marchers (all of
which have been done in the past according to the speaker). The
majority of facilitors were white women with a few men and people of
color. Cate and I decided to be Official March Count team captains
and also collect money.
The March count was intended to ensure that the rally was not
underestimated. I'd have to say it had mixed results. The national
news, local DC news, and Washinhton post all used the 300,000 number.
I noted when I got home that the Globe mentioned both the police and
NOW estimates (yeah, Globe) which seems reasonable to me. The
official NOW estimare given by the speakers was 600,000. They kind of
blew it by stopping the count in the morning as people came directly
from the rally site without marching. The metro was so jammed that
many people walked in from RJK and the Pentagon. So I think the count
may even have been low. Next time, they/we should keep the count
going all day. Espeicailly after all the speeches, people kept asking
to sign the count and the facilitors did not have count sheets.
So we learned how to be Captains for the count. There were all kinds
of facilitator jobs available and I would recommend it for folks it
the future. It's a lot of fun and you really feel that you are making
the event happen.
On exiting, I went over to A Men Who Care group and sent a letter and
coathanger to George Bush. We OD'ed on the scene and went to Dupont
Circle to check out some food and some bookstores. There were
marchers all over the place and there was alot of excitement in the
air. We started meeting people for all over who were marching.
We got up early Sunday (not easy for Cate) and got some breakfast and
took a cab down to the Washington Memorial. The Metro (opening two
hours early) still did not open until 8. Things were kind of a mad
house at first so we started attaching pens to count sheets. At first
we did not attach them to the sheet and I found the got all tangled so
I suggested attaching the pens to the count sheets and this idea
caught on. We started meeting and talking to different folks who had
come to help out. Everyone was really friendly and in a good mood.
We then headed to section C2 where Cate's friends were and started the
count going. Early on, everyone seemed to be pretty well signed up
and things seemed to be under control. We had sheets of where various
groups were and we answered many questions as to where the groups
were. Again, it was fun to help people out and there was a good
feeling going around.
I was in the MASS college area which was fun and there were 100
colleges from Mass at the March. Alright Mass!
I made one trip over to O6 to find the Digital contingent but could
not find anyone. O6 was way in back.
On the second trip, I saw Arun and found the rest of the WM gang and
stopped to chat for awhile. It was nice to meet everyone especially
some folks I had exchanged mail with before.
The pre-rally rally started and it was nice to hear the folksingers
and speakers pumping the crowd. Peter, Paul, and Mary was a nice
surprize! I met people from all over. I was really impressed by the
Florida NOW group who took a 24 hour bus ride to get to the march.
There were all kinds of people there - radicals, students, old, young,
female, male, pregant women, children, gay, straight. It was a fairly
diverse crowd if I had to label it.
The place started getting jammed before the march and I went to the
Simon's Rock area to find Cate but she wasn't there I and was getting
claustophobic so I headed out of the crowd (going against the grain
(which is something I am not uncomforttable with) because I was
supposed to be at the rally area by two to collect money in the yellow
garbage bags.
I went up with a new found friend and co-facillitor and made it to the
rally. I passed the 4000 cross thing which was pretty intense but
kind of left me with a strange feeling and there were people there
praying. There were a few anti's outside counter protesting and you
had to admire their courage for protesting with such a large group of
people with a different view of things.
The speeched were good and varied. Whoopi Goldberg, and
Cybil Shepard spoke as well as all kinds of pols, a labor person, a
lesbian activist, and many others. I was kind of focused on the work
aspect and was reaching my rhetoric limit but I caught snippets of
speeches that I found moving or interesting.
Jesse Jackson really got the crowd going. I collected money and then
left to find Cate (which I was pretty sure was going to be hard!). I
I went up on the stage a few times on errands which was fun and it was
interesting to few how it looked from the stage. There was mega-press
and police up there.
I went all around to the left side without finding her and someone
handed me three petition clipboards from NARAL and I was immediatley
swamped for about a hour with people who wanted to sign. I finally
escaped and was getting tired with facilitating as folks were getting
cranky and expecting the facilators to know everything and be able to
respond to their complaints/suggestion to the march.
By some miracle I ran into Cate who had been doing varius duties all
day and had gathered many names for the count. We headed over to
Union Station and went home very tired. We went to Pizza Hut in
Bethesda and got thanked for faciliting from some folks we sat near
which was nice.
Monday, Cate wanted to lobby while I wanted to be a tourist but she
oversleep and missed alot of the activities so we went down to the
Smithsonian. We checked out the air/space museum and there were
marchers (families of them) all over. The best part for me was a room
with drawing of the solar system done by kids. I guess I am not as
excited as I used to be about technology since I have been studing
Native American history and religion and have been about to see our
society from the point of view of a society that lived in a spiritual
way, in balance, and without the need to dissest, study, and anallize
everything to death. However, the shop had a great kite selection so
I got a kite and we flew it on the mall. The people we were supposed
to meet on the mall were a no show so we checked out the capitol.
Inside the rotunda, I got mad at some pictures of Native American
pictured as either igornant savages or brutal killers which in my
opinion should be pictured the other way around. Anyways, enough
proseliting. We finally left Bethesda at 6 and got in and two or
something like that totally exhausted. (By the way, I ran into a old
friend at a Roy Rodgers on the Jersey Turnpike).
All in all it was an interesting experieince for me and I felt good
about going. I hope we kind all find a way to live together in
balanceand in appreciation for this life on
Mother Earth and I had the feeling that while we may disagree on how,
many of the people at the march had the same vision.
john
Sorry for all the typos but I too tired to fix them - good night and
see ya soon.
|
325.274 | | NEXUS::CONLON | | Wed Apr 12 1989 04:56 | 50 |
| RE: .273
> A couple of things they [the NOW people] stressed were that
> the march was just the beginning; that a political army was
> being formed.
That's a point I remember hearing from one of the speakers (in
the C-SPAN coverage of the event.)
That idea is such music to my ears (I'm getting goosebumps again.)
If the movement can attract 600,000 - 800,000 supporters in
a March (with almost no widespread publicity,) then the Women's
Rights Movement is still as strong and more alive than I realized.
Thank goodness!!!
Once again, I'd like to remark that the first video coverage
I saw of the March (on Headline News) took my breath away.
It was one of the most strikingly beautiful images I ever recall
seeing in my whole life -- all 600-800,000 of you photographed
wonderfully!!!
One of the greatest things were the looks on the faces of the
marchers. You all looked so proud to be there (and so serene
and comfortable in your convictions) -- like everyone else has
said, it was impressive (to say the very least!)
RE: The 'Women of Note' Banner
Thanks for the descriptions of the reactions that the banner
received (along with all the extra photographing of all of you,
and the banner itself!)
I would imagine that the idea (of women networking through
computers worldwide) fascinated quite a few people when they
encountered the Women of Note banner!!
I wonder how many of them realized that some of you were "seeing"
each other for the very first time during the march (although your
knowledge of each other and your friendships had existed over
the net for a long time, in many cases.)
Aside from the exceptional quality of the banner itself, the
idea of a community forming over a computer network is something
that many non-computer people find incredibly interesting.
Hell, *I* find it fascinating and interesting, too! :)
Thanks again for all your reports. Keep 'em coming!
|
325.275 | Thank you! | PARITY::DDAVIS | Long-cool woman in a black dress | Wed Apr 12 1989 11:28 | 12 |
| To all the Women of Note who marched, a big hardy **THANK YOU** from
one woman who wanted to be there in person, but couldn't, but who was
there in spirit...with tears in my eyes and goosebumps on my bod. Thank
goodness there are women like you. I wish I could have been there.
And thank you for posting/typing in your experiences here for all of us
to enjoy.
Thank you all very much. You women are terrific!
-Dotti.
|
325.276 | Thanks | USMFG::PJEFFRIES | the best is better | Wed Apr 12 1989 11:49 | 13 |
|
I have to say, that in my 50+ years on this earth, Sunday was the
most awesome event of my life. Carrying the -wn- banner gave me
a powerful feeling, it was so well made and so attractive that I
wanted the whole world to see it. It will take me several days
to come down from the cloud. Thanks to every one who worked on the
banner.
Also thanks to every one who was there in spirit, the many folks
who wished me well and gave me a positive send off. This was the
greatest.
+pat+
|
325.277 | | SA1794::KELLYB | | Wed Apr 12 1989 12:20 | 6 |
| The March was real. Glad to put a face to all of you wn'ers.
Let's do this again people. I video taped from the cable when I
got home monday morning. I'll be making copies, If anyone wants
a copy send me a tape (VHS) only. Once again it was trully REAL!!
bk
|
325.278 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | mud-luscious and puddle-wonderful | Wed Apr 12 1989 12:53 | 9 |
| I'm many notes behind (can a co-mod admit this in public ? :-).
My mother just called me at work. She told me she was proud of me for marching.
Prouder than she had been when I was valedictorian in high school, worthy
advisor, grand service, or married to Joe (the list gives some pretty
interesting insights into both my mother and me :-). I was stunned. I didn't
even know which way she would lean, or even if she would lean. She said the
woman I'm named after would have done the same.
Mez
|
325.279 | Postcards | HBO::BACHELDER | ybnormal | Wed Apr 12 1989 14:29 | 32 |
|
Hi,
Well, the March was a great success! The NOW estimate was 600,000
people! It was an awesome experience to say the least. I'm still
flying high!
Even though the March is over and most of the petitions have been
signed and turned in, the fight is not over! The first Supreme Court
hearing of Webster vs Missouri is April 26th. If this passes then it
will give all STATES the freedom to take away OUR freedom...of choice!
What NOW is reguesting is that all people who were at the March or who
believe in Freedom of Choice should send a postcard to President Bush.
This is a way to keep the fight going, to let the government know that
we WILL be heard, that we will NOT give up the fight!
If you could take the time to send a postcard that would be great!
I've even decided to send one to Barbara Bush, who by the way is
Pro-Choice but has decided to not voice her opinion since her husband
became president!
The address is: President George Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500
Thanks for the support!
- Lauri
|
325.280 | | MEMORY::SLATER | | Wed Apr 12 1989 15:44 | 21 |
| re .278 (Mez)
My mother died in 1981. But I was involved in the pro-choice movement
since 1972. My mother was pretty conservative and raised a few eyebrows
about many things that I was involved in. However, she supported
the pro-choice movement. That surprised me, and also made us somewhat
closer.
I think this is one hell of a powerful movement. I think that it
strikes to the bare core and nerve of much of our lives and the
fabric of our society. I think we can accomplish much be continuing
this struggle.
Arguing in courts, debating in notesfiles, trying to convince the
ones and twos can be frustrating. The demonstrations, in one fell
swoop, have the power to bring us together. No one can tell any of
us that we are alone. Even the Supreme Court cannot hide. We know
what is right.
Les
|
325.281 | if you want to be heard, speak up | MPGS::HAMBURGER | I'm the NRA | Wed Apr 12 1989 16:55 | 609 |
|
President George Bush 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue 202-456-1414
Washington, DC 20500
private number 202-456-7639
Vice J. Danforth 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue 202-456-1414
President Quayle Washington, DC 20500
MAIN NUMBER THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC. (202)456-1414
MAIN SWITCHBOARD HOUSE AND SENATE (202)224-3121
Here is a phone listing of the herd in D.C. It is old (before the last
election) but since 98% of the incumbants got back in it should still be
very good!
This is a list of U.S. senators.
Phone numbers are the Washington, D.C., office numbers. All are Area
Code 202.
The code for the "Room" column is "SD" means Dirksen Senate
Office Building; "SH" means Hart Senate Office Building; and "SR"
means Russell Senate Office Building. All use the ZIP code 20510.
A typical address would be:
U.S. Sen. Frank H. Murkowski
Hart Senate Office Building
Room 709
Washington, D.C. 20510
Members of the U.S. Senate
State First name Last name Party Phone Room
----- -------------------- --------------- ----- -------- -------
AK Frank H. Murkowski R 224-6665 SH-709
AK Ted Stevens R 224-3004 SH-522
AL Howell Heflin D 224-4124 SH-728
AL Richard C. Shelby D 224-5744 SH 516
AR Dale Bumpers D 224-4843 SD-229
AR David Pyor D 224-2353 SR-264
AZ Dennis DeConcini D 224-4521 SH-328
AZ John McCain R 224-2235 SR-111
CA Alan Cranston D 224-3553 SH-112
CA Pele Milson R 224-3841 SH-720
CO William L. Armstrong R 224-5941 SH-528
CO Timothy C. Wirth D 224-5811 SR-237
CT Christopher J. Dodd D 224-2823 SH-324
CT Lowell P. Jr. Weicker R 224-4041 SR-225
DE Joseph R. Jr. Biden D 224-5042 SR-489
DE William V. Jr. Roth R 224-2441 SH-104
FL Lawton Chiles D 224-5274 SR-250
FL Bob Graham D 224-3041 SH-313
GA Wyche Jr. Fowler D 224-3643 SH-210
GA Sam Nunn D 224-3521 SD-303
HA Daniel K. lnouye D 224-3934 SH-722
HA Spark M. Matsunaga D 224-6361 SH-109
IA Charles E. Grassley R 224-3744 SH-135
IA Tom Harkin D 224-3254 SH-316
ID James A. McClure R 224-2752 SH-309
ID Steve Symms R 224-6142 SH-509
IL Alan J. Dixon D 224-2854 SH-331
IL Paul Simon D 224-2152 SD-462
IN Richard G. Lugar R 224-4814 SH-306
IN Dan Quale R 224-5623 SH-524
KS Robert Dole R 224-6521 SH-141
KS Nancy Landon Kassebaum R 224-4774 SR-302
KY Wendell H. Ford D 224-4343 SR-173A
KY Mitch McConnell R 224-2541 SR-120
LA John B. Breaux D 224-4623 SD-104
LA J. Bennett Johnston D 224-5824 SH-136
MA Edward M. Kennedy D 224-4543 SR-315
MA John Kerry D 224-2742 SR-362
MD Barbara A. Mikulski D 224-4654 SH-320
MD Paul S. Sarbanes D 224-4524 SD-332
ME William S. Cohen R 224-2523 SH-322
ME George J. Mitchell D 224-5344 SR-176
MI Carl Levin D 224-6221 SR-459
MI Donald W. Jr. Reigle D 224-4822 SD 105
MN Rudy Boschwitz R 224-5641 SH-506
MN Dave Durenberger R 224-3244 SR-154
MO Christopher S. "Kit" Bond R 224-5721 SR-293
MO John C. Danforth R 224-6154 SR-497
MS Thad Cochran R 224-5054 SR-326
MS John C. Stennis D 224-6253 SR-205
MT Max Baucus D 224-2651 SH-706
MT John Melcher D 224-2644 SH-730
NC Jessie Helms R 224-6342 SD-403
NC Terry Sanford D 224-3154 SH-716
ND Quentin N. Burdick D 224-2551 SH-511
ND Kent Conrad D 224-2043 SD-361
NE J. James Exon D 224-4224 SH-330
NE David Karnes R 224-6551 SR-441
NH Gordon J. Humphrey R 224-2841 SH-531
NH Warren B. Rudman R 224-3324 SH-530
NJ Bill Bradley D 224-3224 SH-731
NJ Frank R. Lautenberg D 224-4744 SH-717
NM Jeff Bingaman D 224-5521 SH-502
NM Pete V. Domenici R 224-6621 SD-434
NV Chic Hecht R 224-6244 SH-302
NV Harry Reid D 224-3542 SH 708
NY Alfonse M. D'Amato R 224-6542 SH-520
NY Daniel Patrick Moynihan D 224-4451 SR-46d
OH John Glenn D 224-3353 SH-503
OH Howard M. Metzenbaum D 224-2315 SR-140
OK David L. Boren D 224-4721 SQ-453
OK Don Nickles R 224-5754 SH-713
OR Mark O. Hatfield R 224-3753 SH-711
OR Bob Packwood R 224-5244 SR-259
PA John Heinz R 224-6324 SR-277
PA Arlen Specter R 224-4254 SH-303
RI John H. Chafee R 224-2921 SD-567
RI Claiborne Pell D 224-4642 SR-411
SC Ernest F. Hollings D 224-6121 SR-125
SC Strom Thurmond R 224-5972 SR-218
SD Thomas A. Daschle D 224-2321 SH-317
SD Larry Pressler R 224-5842 SR-411
TN Albert Jr. Gore D 224-4944 SR-393
TN Jim Sasser D 224-3344 SR-363
TX Lloyd Bentsen D 224-5922 SH-703
TX Phil Gramm R 224-2934 SR-370
UT Jake Garn R 225-5444 SD-505
UT Orrin G. Hatch R 224-5251 SR-135
VA Paul S. Jr. Trible R 224-4024 SH-517
VA John W. Warner R 224-2023 SR-421
VT Patrick J. Leahy D 224-4242 SR-D33
VT Robert T. Stafford R 224-5141 SH-133
WA Brock Adams D 224-2621 SH-513
WA Daniel J. Evans R 224-3441 SH-702
WI Bob Kasten R 224-5323 SH-110
WI William Proxmire D 224-5653 SD-530
WV Robert C. Byrd D 224-3954 SH-311
WV John D. lV Rockefeller D 224-6472 SD-241
WY Alan K. Simpson R 224-3424 SD-261
WY Malcolm Wallop R 224-6441 SR-206
========================================================================
This is a list of members of the U.S. House of Representatives.
"Dist." is the representative's congressional district. For
example, Sonny Callahan represents the 1st Congressional District
of Alabama.
"Phone" is the Washington, D.C., office number. All phone
listings here are in Area Code 202.
"Room" is the representative's office address. Three-digit
numbers are in the Cannon House Office Building. Four-digit
number beginning with 1 are in the Longworth House Office
Building. And four-digit numbers beginning with 2 are in the
Rayburn House Office Building. All use the ZIP code 20515. For
example, Sonny Callahan's mailing address would be,
U.S. Rep. Sonny Callahan
Rayburn House Office Building
Room 1232
Washington, D.C. 20515
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives
Dist. First name Last name Party Phone Room
------- ------------------- ---------------- ----- --------- ----
AL (1) Sonny Callahan R 225-4931 1232
AL (2) William L. Dickinson R 225-2901 2406
AL (3) Bill Nichols D 225-3261 2405
AL (4) Tom Bevill D 225-4876 2302
AL (5) Ronnie G. Flippo D 225-4801 2334
AL (6) Ben Erdreich D 225-4921 439
AL (7) Claude Harris D 225-2665 1009
AR (1) Bill Alexander D 225-4076 233
AR (2) Tommy F. Robinson D 225-2506 1541
AR (3) John Paul Hammerschmidt R 225-4301 2207
AR (4) Beryl Jr. Anthony D 225-3772 1117
AZ (1) John J. III Rhodes R 225-2635 510
AZ (2) Morris K. Udall D 225-4065 235
AZ (3) Bob Stump R 225-4576 211
AZ (4) Jon Kyl R 225-3361 313
AZ (5) Jim Kolbe R 225-2542 1222
CA (1) Douglas H. Bosco D 225-3311 408
CA (10) Don Edwards D 225-3072 2307
CA (11) Tom Lantos D 225-3531 1707
CA (12) Ernest L. Konnyu R 225-5411 511
CA (13) Norman Y. Mineta D 225-2631 2350
CA (14) Norman D. Shumway R 225-2511 1203
CA (15) Tony Coelho D 225-6131 403
CA (16) Leon E. Panetta D 225-2861 339
CA (17) Charles Jr. Pashayan R 225-3341 129
CA (18) Richard H. Lehman D 225-4540 1319
CA (19) Robert J. Lagomarsino R 225-3601 2332
CA (2) Wally Herger R 225-3076 1630
CA (21) Ellon Gallegly R 225-5811 1020
CA (22) Carlos J. Moorhead R 225-4176 2346
CA (23) Anthony C. Beilenson D 225-5911 1025
CA (24) Henry A. Waxman D 225-3976 2418
CA (25) Edward R. Roybal D 225-6235 2211
CA (26) Howard L. Berman D 225-4695 137
CA (27) Mel Levine D 225-6451 132
CA (28) Julian C. Dixon D 225-7084 2400
CA (29) Auguslus F. Hawkins D 225-2201 2371
CA (2O) William M. Thomas R 225-2915 2402
CA (3) Robert T. Matsui D 225-7163 2419
CA (30) Matthew G. Martinez D 225-5464 109
CA (31) Mervyn M. Dymally D 225-5425 1717
CA (32) Glenn M. Anderson D 225-6676 2329
CA (33) David Dreier R 225-2305 4lO
CA (34) Esteban Edward Torres D 225-5256 1740
CA (35) Jerry Lewis R 225-5861 326
CA (36) George E. Jr. Brown D 225-6161 2256
CA (37) Al McCandless R 225-5330 435
CA (38) Bob Dornan R 225-2965 301
CA (39) William E. Dannemeyer R 225-4111 1214
CA (4) Vic Fazio D 225-5716 2433
CA (40) Robert E. Badham R 225-5611 2427
CA (41) Bill Lowry R 225-3201 225
CA (42) Dan Lungren R 225-2415 2440
CA (43) Ron Packard R 225-3906 316
CA (44) Jim Bates D 225-5452 1404
CA (45) Duncan Hunter R 225-5672 133
CA (6) Barbara Boxer D 225-5161 307
CA (7) George Miller D 225-2095 2228
CA (8) Ronald V. Dellums D 225-2661 2136
CA (9) Fortney H. "Pete" Stark D 225-5065 1125
CO (1) Patricia Schroeder D 225-4431 2410
CO (2) David E. Skaggs D 225-2161 1723
CO (3) Ben Nighthorse Campbell D 225-4761 1724
CO (4) Hank Brown R 225-4676 1424
CO (5) Joel Hefley R 225-4422 508
CO (6) Dan L. Schaefer R 225-7882 1317
CT (1) Barbara B. Kennelly D 225-2265 1230
CT (2) Sam Gejdenson D 225-2076 1410
CT (3) Bruce A. Morrison D 225-3661 437
CT (4) Stewart B. McKinney R 225-5541 237
CT (5) John G. Rowland R 225-3822 512
CT (6) Nancy L. Johnson R 225-4476 119
DC Walter E. Fauntroy D 225-8050 2135
DE (AL) Thomas R. Carper D 225-4165 131
FL (1) Earl Hutto D 225-4136 2435
FL (10) Andy Ireland D 225-5015 2416
FL (11) Bill Nelson D 225-3671 2404
FL (12) Tom Lewis R 225-5792 1216
FL (13) Connie Mack R 225-2536 228
FL (14) Daniel A. Mica D 225-3001 2455
FL (15) E. Clay Jr. Shaw R 225-3026 440
FL (16) Lawrence J. Smith D 225-7931 113
FL (17) William Lehman D 225-4211 2347
FL (18) Claude Pepper D 225-3931 2239
FL (19) Dante B. Fascell D 225-4506 2354
FL (2) Bill Grant D 225-5235 1331
FL (3) Charles E. Bennett D 225-2501 2107
FL (4) Bill Jr. Chappell D 225-4035 2468
FL (5) Bill McCollum R 225-2176 1507
FL (6) Buddy MacKay D 225-5744 330
FL (7) Sam Gibbons D 225-3376 2204
FL (8) C. W. Bill Young R 225-5961 2407
FL (9) Michael Billirakis R 225-5755 1530
GA (1) Robert Lindsay Thomas D 225-5831 431
GA (10) Doug Jr. Barnard D 225-4101 2227
GA (2) Charles Hatcher D 225-3631 405
GA (2) Charles Hayes D 225-4372 1028
GA (3) Richard Ray D 225-5901 425
GA (4) Pat Swindall R 225-4272 331
GA (5) John Lewis D 225-3801 501
GA (6) Newt Gingrich R 225-4501 2438
GA (7) George "Buddy" Dardan D 225-2931 1330
GA (8) J. Roy Rowland D 225-6531 423
GA (9) Ed Jenkins D 225-5211 203
GU Ben Blaz R 225-1188 1130
HI (1) Patricia F. Saiki R 225-2726 1407
HI (2) Daniel K. Akaka D 225-4906 2301
IA (1) Jim Leach R 225-6576 1514
IA (2) Tom Tauke R 225-2911 2244
IA (3) David R. Nagle D 225-3301 214
IA (4) Neal Smith D 225-4426 2373
IA (5) Jim Lightfoot R 225-3806 1609
IA (6) Fred Grandy R 225-5476 1711
ID (1) Larry E. Craig R 225-6611 1034
ID (2) Richard H. Stallings D 225-5531 1221
IL (10) John Edward Porter R 225-4835 1131
IL (11) Frank Annunzio D 225-6661 2303
IL (12) Philip M. Crane R 225-3711 1035
IL (13) Harris W. Fawell R 225-3515 318
IL (14) Dennis Hastert R. 225-2976 515
IL (15) Edward R. Madigan R 225-2371 2312
IL (16) Lynn Martin R 225-5676 1208
IL (17) Lane Evans D 225-5905 328
IL (18) Robert H. Michel R 225-6201 2112
IL (19) Tery L. Bruce D 225-5001 419
IL (2) Gus Savage D 225-0773 1121
IL (20) Richard J. Durbin D 225-5271 417
IL (21) Melvin Price D 225-5661 2110
IL (22) Kenneth J. Gray D 225-5201 2109
IL (3) Marty Russo D 225-5736 2233
IL (4) Jack Davis R 225-3635 1234
IL (5) William O. Lipinski D 225-5701 1032
IL (6) Henry J. Hyde R 225-4561 2104
IL (7) Cardiss Collins D 225-5006 2264
IL (8) Dan Rostenkowski D 225-4061 2111
IL (9) Sidney R. Yates D 225-2111 2234
IN (1) Peter J. Visclosky D 225-2461 420
IN (10) Andrew Jr. Jacobs D 225-4011 1533
IN (2) Philip R. Sharp D 225-3021 2452
IN (3) John Hiler R 225-3915 407
IN (4) Dan Coats R 225-4436 1417
IN (5) Jim Jontz D 225-5037 1005
IN (6) Dan Burton R 225-2276 120
IN (7) John T. Myers R 225-5805 2372
IN (8) Frank McCloskey D 225-4636 127
IN (9) Lee H. Hamilton D 225-5315 2187
KS (1) Pat Roberts R 225-2715 1314
KS (2) Jim Slattery D 225-6601 1440
KS (3) Jan Meyers R 225-2865 315
KS (4) Dan Glickman D 225-6176 1212
KS (5) Bob Whittaker R 225-3911 2436
KY (2) William H. Natcher D 225-3501 2333
KY (3) Romano L. Mazzoli D 225-5401 2246
KY (4) Jim Bunning R 225-3465 1123
KY (5) Harold Rogers R 225-4601 206
KY (6) Larry J. Hopkins R 225-4706 2437
KY (7) Carroll Jr. Hubbard D 225-3115 2182
KY (7) Carl C. Perkins D 225-4935 l004
LA (1) Bob Livingston R 225-3015 2412
LA (2) Lindy (Mrs. Hale) Boggs D 225-6636 2353
LA (3) W. J. Billly Tauzin D 225-4031 222
LA (4) Buddy Roemer D 225-2777 103
LA (5) Jerry Huckaby D 225-2376 2421
LA (6) Richard H. Baker R 225-3901 506
LA (7) Jimmy Hayes D 225-2031 503
LA (8) Clyde C. Holloway R 225-4926 1207
MA (1) Silvio O. Conte R 225-5335 2300
MA (10) Gerry E. Studds D 225-3111 1501
MA (11) Brian J. Donnelly D 225-3215 438
MA (2) Edward P. Boland D 225-5601 2426
MA (3) Joseph D. Early D 225-6101 2349
MA (4) Barney Frank D 225-5931 1030
MA (5) Chester G. Atkins D 225-3411 504
MA (6) Nicholas Mavroules D 225-8020 2432
MA (7) Edward J. Markey D 225-2836 2133
MA (8) Joseph P. II Kennedy D 225-5111 1631
MA (9) Joe Moakley D 225-8273 221
MD (2) Helen Delich Bentley R 225-3061 1610
MD (3) Benjamin L. Cardin D 225-4016 507
MD (4) Tom McMillen D 225-8090 1508
MD (5) Steny H. Hoyer D 225-4131 1513
MD (6) Beverly B. Byron D 225-2721 2430
MD (7) Roy Dyson D 225-5311 224
MD (7) Kweisi Mfume D 225-4741 1107
MD (8) Constance A. Morella R 225-5341 1024
ME (1) Joseph E. Brennan D 225-6116 1428
ME (2) Olympia J. Snowe R 225-6306 2464
MI (1) John Jr. Conyers D 225-5126 2313
MI (10) Bill Schuette R 225-3561 415
MI (11) Robert W. Davis R 225-4735 2417
MI (12) David E. Bonior D 225-2106 2242
MI (13) George W. Jr. Crockett D 225-2261 1531
MI (14) Dennis M. Hertel D 225-6276 218
MI (15) Willliam D. Ford D 225-6261 239
MI (16) John D. Dingell D 225-4071 2221
MI (17) Sander M. Levin D 225-4961 323
MI (18) William S. Broomfield R 225-6135 2306
MI (2) Carl D. Pursell R 225-4401 1414
MI (3) Howard Wolpe D 225-5011 1535
MI (4) Fred Upton R 225-3761 1607
MI (5) Paul B. Henry R 225-3831 215
MI (6) Bob Carr D 225-4872 2439
MI (7) Dale E. Kildee D 225-3611 2262
MI (8) Bob Traxler D 225-2806 2366
MI (9) Guy Vander Jagt R 225-3511 2409
MN (1) Timothy J. Penny D 225-2472 436
MN (2) Vin Weber R 225-2331 106
MN (3) Bill Frenzel R 225-2871 1026
MN (4) Bruce F. Vento D 225-6631 2304
MN (5) Martin Olav Sabo D 225-4755 2201
MN (6) Gerry Sikorski D 225-2271 414
MN (7) Arlan Stangeland R 225-2165 2245
MN (8) James L. Oberstar D 225-6211 2351
MO (1) William L. Clay D 225-2406 2470
MO (2) Jack Buechner R 225-2561 502
MO (3) Richard A. Gephardt D 225-2671 1432
MO (4) lke Skelton D 225-2876 2453
MO (5) Alan Wheat D 225-4535 1204
MO (6) E. Thomas Coleman R 225-7041 2344
MO (7) Gene Taylor R 225-6536 2134
MO (8) Bill Emerson R 225-4404 418
MO (9) Harold L. Volkmer D 225-2956 2411
MS (1) Jamie Whitten D 225-4306 2314
MS (2) Mike Espy D 225-5876 216
MS (3) G.V. Sonny Montgomery D 225-5031 2184
MS (4) Wayne Dowdy D 225-5865 240
MS (5) Trent Lott R 225-5772 2185
MT (1) Pat Williams D 225-3211 2457
MT (2) Ron Marlenee R 225-1555 2465
NC (1) Walter B. Jones D 225-3101 241
NC (10) Cass Ballenger R 225-2576 116
NC (11) James McClure Clarke D 225-6401 217
NC (2) Tim Valentine D 225-4531 1510
NC (3) H. Martin Lancaster D 225-3415 1408
NC (4) David E. Price D 225-1784 1223
NC (5) Stephen L. Neal D 225-2071 2463
NC (6) Howard Coble R 225-3065 430
NC (7) Charlie Rose D 225-2731 2230
NC (8) W. G. "Bill" Hefner D 225-3715 2161
NC (9) J. Alex McMillan R 225-1976 401
ND (AL) Byron L. Dorgan D 225-2611 238
NE (1) Doug Bereuter R 225-4806 2446
NE (2) Hal Daub R 225-4155 1019
NE (3) Virginia Smith R 225-6435 2202
NH (1) Robert C. Smith R 225-5456 115
NH (2) Chuck Douglass R 225-5206 1338
NJ (1) James J. Florio D 225-6501 2162
NJ (10) Peter W. Jr. Rodino D 225-3436 2462
NJ (11) Dean A. Gallo R 225-5034 1318
NJ (12) Jim Courter R 225-5801 2422
NJ (13) H. James Saxton R 225-4765 324
NJ (14) Frank J. Guarini D 225-2765 2458
NJ (2) William J. Hughes D 225-6572 341
NJ (3) James J. Howard D 225-4671 2188
NJ (4) Chrisiopher H. Smith R 225-3765 422
NJ (5) Marge Roukema R 225-4465 303
NJ (6) Bernard J. Dwyer D 225-6301 404
NJ (7) Matthew J. Rinaldo R 225-5361 2469
NJ (8) Robert A. Roe D 225-5751 2243
NJ (9) Robert G. Torricelli D 225-5061 317
NM (1) Manuel Jr. Lujan R 225-6316 1323
NM (2) Joe Skeen R 225-2365 1007
NM (3) Billl Richardson D 225-6190 332
NV (1) James Billbray D 225-5965 1431
NV (2) Barbara F. Vucanovich R 225-6155 312
NY (1) George J. Hochbrueckner D 225-3826 1008
NY (10) Charles E. Schumer D 225-6616 126
NY (11) Edolphus Towns D 225-5936 1726
NY (12) Major R. Owens D 225-6231 ll4
NY (13) Stephen J. Solarz D 225-2361 1536
NY (14) Guy V. Molinari R 225-3371 208
NY (15) Bill Green R 225-2436 1110
NY (15) Raymond J. McGrath R 225-5516 205
NY (16) Charles B. Rangel D 225-4365 2330
NY (17) Ted Weiss D 225-5635 2442
NY (18) Robert Garcia D 225-4361 2338
NY (19) Mario Biaggi D 225-2464 2428
NY (2) Thomas J. Downey D 225-3335 2232
NY (20) Joseph J. DioGuardi R 225-6506 325
NY (21) Hamilton Jr. Fish R 225-5441 2269
NY (22) Benjamin A. Gilman R 225-3776 2160
NY (23) Samuel S. Stratton D 225-5076 2205
NY (24) Gerald B. H. Solomon R 225-5614 2342
NY (25) Sherwood Boehlert R 225-3665 1641
NY (26) David 0'B. Martin R 225-4611 442
NY (27) George C. Wortley R 225-3701 229
NY (28) Matthew F. McHugh D 225-6335 2335
NY (29) Frank Horton R 225-4916 2229
NY (3) Robert J. Mrazek D 225-5956 306
NY (30) Louise M. Slaughter D 225-3615 1313
NY (31) Jack F. Kemp R 225-5265 2252
NY (32) John J. LaFalce D 225-3231 2367
NY (33) Henry J. Nowak D 225-3306 2240
NY (34) Amo Houghton R 225-3161 1217
NY (4) Norman F. Lent R 225-7896 2408
NY (6) Floyd H. Flake D 225-3461 1427
NY (7) Gary L. Ackerman D 225-2601 1725
NY (8) James H. Scheuer D 225-5471 2466
NY (9) Thomas J. Manton D 225-3965 327
OH (1) Thomas A. Luken D 225-2216 2368
OH (10) Clarence E. Miller R 225-5131 2208
OH (11) Dennis E. Eckart D 225-6331 1210
OH (12) John R. Kasich R 225-5355 1133
OH (13) Don J. Pease D 225-3401 1127
OH (14) Thomas C. Sawyer D 225-5231 1338
OH (15) Chalmers P. Wylie R 225-2015 2310
OH (16) Ralph Regula R 225-3876 2209
OH (17) James A. Jr. Traficant D 225-5261 128
OH (18) Douglas Applegate D 225-6265 2183
OH (19) Edward F. Feighan D 225-5731 1124
OH (2) Bill Gradison R 225-3164 2311
OH (21) Louis Stokes D 225-7032 2365
OH (2O) Mary Rose Oakar D 225-5871 2231
OH (3) Tony P. Hall D 225-6465 2448
OH (4) Michael G. Oxley R 225-2676 1108
OH (5) Delbert L. Latta R 225-6405 2309
OH (6) Bob McEwen R 225-5705 329
OH (7) Michael DeWine R 225-4324 1705
OH (8) Donald E. Buz Lukens R 225-6205 117
OH (9) Marcy Kaptur D 225-4146 228
OK (1) James M. Inhofe R 225-2211 1017
OK (2) MIke Synar D 225-2701 2441
OK (3) Wes Watkins D 225-4565 2348
OK (4) Dave McCurdy D 225-6165 409
OK (5) Mickey Edwards R 225-2132 2434
OK (6) Glenn English D 225-5565 2235
OR (1) Les AuCoin D 225-0855 2159
OR (2) Robert F. Smith R 225-6730 118
OR (3) Ron Wyden D 225-4811 1406
OR (4) Peter A. DeFazio D 225-6416 1729
OR (5) Denny Smith R 225-5711 1213
PA (1) Thomas M. Foglietta D 225-4731 231
PA (10) Joseph M. McDade R 225-3731 2370
PA (11) Paul E. Kanjorski D 225-6511 1518
PA (12) John P. Murtha D 225-2065 2423
PA (13) Lawrence Coughlin R 225-6111 2467
PA (14) William J. Coyne D 225-2301 424
PA (15) Don Ritter R 225-6411 2447
PA (16) Robert S. Walker R 225-2411 2445
PA (17) George W. Gekas R 225-4315 1519
PA (18) Doug Walgren D 225-2135 2241
PA (19) Bill Goodling R 225-5836 2263
PA (2) Willliam H. III Gray D 225-4001 204
PA (20) Joseph M. Gaydos D 225-4631 2186
PA (21) Tom Ridge R 225-5406 1714
PA (22) Austin J. Murphy D 225-4665 2210
PA (23) William F. Jr. Clinger R 225-5121 1122
PA (3) Robert A. Borski D 225-8251 3l4
PA (4) Joe Kolter D 225-2565 212
PA (5) Richard T. Schulze R 225-5761 2369
PA (6) Gus Yatron D 225-5546 2267
PA (7) Curt Weldon R 225-2011 1233
PA (8) Peter H. Kostmayer D 225-4276 123
PA (9) Bud Shuster R 225-2431 2268
PR Jaime B. Fuster Pop. 225-2615 427
RI (1) Fernand J. St. Germain D 225-4911 2108
RI (2) Claudine Schneider R 225-2735 1512
Samoa Fofo I.F. Sunia D 225-8577 1206
SC (1) Arthur Jr. Ravenel R 225-3176 1730
SC (2) Floyd Spence R 225-2452 2113
SC (3) Butler Derrick D 225-5301 201
SC (4) Liz Patterson D 225-6030 1022
SC (5) John M. Jr. Spratt D 225-5501 1118
SC (6) Robin Tallon D 225-3315 432
SD (AL) Tim Johnson D 225-2801 513
TN (1) James H. Quillen R 225-6356 102
TN (2) John J. Duncan R 225-5435 2206
TN (3) Marilyn Lloyd D 225-3271 2266
TN (5) Bill Boner D 225-4311 107
TN (6) Bart Gordon D 225-4231 1517
TN (7) Don Sundquist R 225-2811 230
TN (8) Ed Jones D 225-4714 108
TN (9) Harold E. Ford D 225-3265 2305
TN (D) Jim Cooper D 225-6831 125
TX (1) Jim Chapman D 225-3035 429
TX (10) J. J. Pickle D 225-4865 242
TX (11) Marvin Leath D 225-6105 336
TX (12) Jim Wright D 225-5071 1236
TX (13) Beau Boulter R 225-3706 124
TX (14) Mac Sweeney R 225-2831 1713
TX (15) E. "Kika" de la Garza D 225-2531 1401
TX (16) Ronald D. Coleman D 225-4831 416
TX (17) Charles W. Stenholm D 225-6605 1226
TX (18) Mickey Leland D 225-3816 2236
TX (19) Larry Combest R 225-4005 1529
TX (2) Charles Wilson D 225-240l 2265
TX (20) Henry B. Gonzalez D 225-3236 2413
TX (21) Lamar Smith R 225-4236 509
TX (22) Thomas D. DeLay R 225-5951 1039
TX (23) Albert G. Bustamante D 225-4511 1116
TX (24) Martin Frost D 225-3605 2459
TX (25) Michael A. Andrews D 225-7508 322
TX (26) Dick Armey R 225-7772 514
TX (27) Solomon P. Ortiz D 225-7742 1524
TX (3) Steve Bartlett R 225-4201 1709
TX (4) Ralph M. Hall D 225-6673 236
TX (5) John Bryant D 225-2231 412
TX (6) Joe L. Barton R 225-2002 1225
TX (7) Billl Archer R 225-2571 1135
TX (8) Jack Fields R 225-4901 413
TX (9) Jack Brooks D 225-6565 2449
UT (1) James V. Hansen R 225-0453 1113
UT (2) Wayne Owens D 225-3011 1728
UT (3) Howard C. Nielson R 225-7751 1229
VA (1) Herbert H. Bateman R 225-4261 1527
VA (10) Frank R. Wolf R 225-5136 130
VA (2) Owen B. Pickett D 225-4215 1429
VA (3) Thomas J. Jr. Bliley R 225-2815 213
VA (4) Norman Sisisky D 225-6365 426
VA (5) Dan Daniel D 225-4711 2308
VA (6) Jim Olin D 225-5431 1238
VA (7) D. French Jr. Slaughter R 225-6561 319
VA (8) Stan Parris R 225-4376 1526
VA (9) Rick Boucher D 225-3861 428
VI Ron de Lugo D 225-1790 2238
VT (AL) James M. Jeffords R 225-4115 2431
WA (1) John R. Miller R 225-6311 1224
WA (2) Al Swift D 225-2605 1502
WA (3) Don Bonker D 225-3536 434
WA (4) Sid Morrison R 225-5816 1434
WA (5) Thomas S. Foley D 225-2006 1201
WA (6) Norman D. Dicks D 225-5916 2429
WA (7) MIke Lowry D 225-3106 2454
WA (8) Rod Chandler R 225-7761 223
WI (1) Les Aspin D 225-3031 2336
WI (2) Robert W. Kastenmeier D 225-2906 2328
WI (3) Steve Gunderson R 225-5506 227
WI (4) Gerald D. Kleczka D 225-4572 226
WI (5) Jim Moody D 225-3571 1721
WI (6) Thomas E. Petri R 225-2476 2443
WI (7) David R. Obey D 225-3365 2217
WI (8) Toby Roth R 225-5665 2352
WI (9) F. James Jr. Sensenbrenner R 225-5101 2444
WV (1) Alan B. Mollohan D 225-4172 516
WV (2) Harley O. Jr. Staggers D 225-4331 1504
WV (3) Bob Wise D 225-2711 1421
WV (4) Nick J. II Rahall D 225-3452 343
WY (AL) Dick Cheney R 225-2311 104
_---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
325.282 | an update | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Wed Apr 12 1989 17:54 | 7 |
| someone told me that the Washington parks department estimate of
march attendees was _lower_ than the Metro's count of "extra"
passengers (number of passengers above their normal count)! that
doesn't include the people who walked or took cabs (quite a few,
judging from the numbers i saw as i rode through the city)
phew!!
|
325.283 | Another Marcher | NRPUR::NASON | | Thu Apr 13 1989 09:46 | 13 |
| Well, I'm still feeling energized by Sunday's march. It was a
wonderful experience. The notes that I have read here say it
better than I ever could.
The one thing that really amazes me is the number of people I have
talked to since I got back who's first response is a big, heart felt
'Thank You'. Many of them feel closer to the reality of it just
knowing someone who was there.
Mandy
|
325.284 | | LDYBUG::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Thu Apr 13 1989 12:16 | 4 |
| I'm so proud of you all. Thank you all for your courage and your
concern.
Mary
|
325.285 | Nametags as Souvenirs | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Thu Apr 13 1989 12:32 | 7 |
| It's been suggested that some of the march participants would
appreciate having another copy of their nametag made to keep as a
souvenir, since some of the ones actually worn have gone away as a
result. If you marched, and you would like a fresh copy of your
nametag, please send me mail and in a few days I'll print them up.
=maggie
|
325.286 | Struggling to find an unoffensive way to say this | EVER11::KRUPINSKI | | Thu Apr 13 1989 22:49 | 12 |
| The world seems to me a much uglier place this week, than last.
Clearly, the people involved were doing what they felt in their
hearts was right, but my mind struggles to comprehend how so
many people can come to a conclusion that is, in itself,
difficult for me to comprehend.
There is also the frustrating feeling that if the time, money
and energy spent by both sides on arguing over how to fight
the problem were spent instead on actually fighting the problem,
how much smaller the problem would be.
Tom_K
|
325.287 | | RICKS::BUTLER | There's more to it than fate | Fri Apr 14 1989 00:06 | 14 |
| re.286
I feel that the time, money and energy were all well spent in
an effort to gain awareness. Awareness and being knowledgeable
are first steps before "fighting the problem".
The rally and it's preperations succeeded in giving this world
an eye-opener which now enables many people to realize both the
importance and intensity of this issue and how united we can and
will better our lives.
Personally I've found this week exhilerating and would like to
thank you all for your participation, especially those who were
actively involved.
Peace-
Mary Jo
|
325.288 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | mud-luscious and puddle-wonderful | Fri Apr 14 1989 09:31 | 22 |
| I think this is what you're looking for Renee.
Mez
================================================================================
Note 545.0 Comments on the DC March ? No replies
STAR::CULVER "Life can be thought of as just one bi" 13 lines 13-APR-1989 23:35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had hoped to see some comments on the march in DC but have failed to
detect them.
I found it to be exhilarating. I especially enjoyed meeting Anne-Marie,
Liz, Robin and Jennifer. It was also great seeing Sue, Mike and Tamz.
As with these kinds of experiences, I find myself unable to begin to
capture the spirit and electricity of having been there.
It was great seeing so many DECies and wimmin-of-note there.
Renee
|
325.289 | Official Video Information | MTWAIN::KAHN | | Fri Apr 14 1989 09:40 | 58 |
| KEEP ABORTION SAFE AND LEGAL PASS THE ERA
A Call to Action!
The March for Women's Equality/Women's Lives
Video Tape
The power, excitement and massiveness of the April 9th March for
Women's Equality/Women's Lives is being captured on a 30-minute videotape
that will be the Official Documentary of the largest March in women's
rights history. "A Call to Action!" is being produced for the National
Organization for Women, the chief organizer of the March.
In addition to in-depth coverage of the March itself, the tape will feature
behind-the-scenes interviews with Molly Yard, President of NOW, Sheri
O'Dell, Action Vice-President of NOW and March coordinator, and Eleanor
Smeal, President of the Fund for the Feminist Majority, along with the many
others who helped make the April 9th March the most important mass
demonstration for women's rights in history. The tape also will reveal the
plans and details of NOW's Emergency Campaign to keep abortion legal that
will be launched by the March.
Also appearing in the tape will be: Susan Sarandon, Whoopi Goldberg, Rev.
Jesse Jackson, Patricia Schroeder, Gloria Steinem, Faye Wattleton, Marlo
Thomas, Holly Near, Don Edwards, Byllye Avery, Mellisa Manchester, Dolores
Huerta, Robin Tyler, Lt.Gov. Evely Murphy, and Peter, Paul & Mary.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please send me _________ copies of "A Call to Action!" The March for
Women's Equality/Women's Lives, the official documentary of the April 9th
March, for $19.95 each + $2 S & H
Name __________________________________ Phone (_____)__________________
Address________________________________ City ______ ST _____ Zip _______
Check one to charge your purchase: Master Card ______ VISA ______
My credit card is valid through: ___________________
My credit card number: (all digits please)
____________________________________________________________
Order Total $ _____________________
Bulk order information available upon request
Signature ______________________________________
Please clip and return form with your check (made payable to NOW March) or
credit charge information to the March for Women's Equality/Women's Lives,
NOW, P.O. Box 7813, Washington, D.C. 20044
|
325.290 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Fri Apr 14 1989 09:44 | 12 |
| <--(.286)
Tom, I'm with you about the "time, money, and energy" part, but I feel
sure the two sides would never agree on what "the problem" _is_.
A very clear indication of that, I think, is that you feel the March
made the world "a much uglier place"...whereas I feel quietly hopeful
that we may have given the government and the Court a message about how
responsible, adult American citizens are not willing --for ANY reason--
to go back to the days where the only way out was a bloody coathanger.
=maggie
|
325.291 | | MEMORY::SLATER | | Fri Apr 14 1989 10:10 | 22 |
| re .286 (Tom)
> The world seems to me a much uglier place this week, than last.
Before last week, the the people that *ARE* trying to take away a
woman's right to choose a safe a legal abortion, had the spotlight
and a certain pretention of being the mainstream.
This week the world knows that a sizable portion of our population
do not agree with these people. This is what makes this week "ugly"
to some. 600 thousand in the streets mean millions and millions back
at home are saying that we are not murderers, we are not Nazzis.
We want our rights!
Those anti-abortion people could ***NEVER*** get hundreds of thousands
of people out in public to openly deny a woman's right to choose.
THEY are the minority, and the government including the Supreme
Court know it. They also know that *we* know that *they* know it.
That is why some think this week is so ugly.
Les
|
325.292 | We are Mainstream They are Not | USEM::DONOVAN | | Fri Apr 14 1989 11:22 | 16 |
| Les,
These anti-abortion folks have had annual rallys of between 75,000
and 100,000 people. I know we are in the majority but because abortion
is actually an "ugly" thing to do, we have been a silent majority.
NO LONGER. The sleeping giant has awakened.
Actually, we will never sway those who believe abortion is infanticide.
If I believed that, I would march with them. They are dangerous,
violent and convicted. To illustrate, did you se the news last night?
They broke into a clinic and broke a workers nose. 70 were arrensted.
They are threatening a clinic in Brookline with economic disaster.
If the radical cry is"by any means necessary" consider them radicals
in the 10th degree.
Kate
|
325.293 | | MEMORY::SLATER | | Fri Apr 14 1989 11:57 | 33 |
| re .292
Kate,
I do not believe the antis could get their 75k if the issues were
clear. I have no problem with anyone stating any way they wish that
they would not have an abortion or do not like it. That is their
business. These people have the state on their side. Also many churches
are helping. These are very powerful institutions.
The antis are dishonest. They only want to stop legal, safe abortions
for the the millions of woman that may need them. They have no
possibility of stopping abortions. Their leaders know this.
These people are dangerous. Operation Rescue should be *DEFEATED*.
They need to be defeated, and decisively.
> They are threatening a clinic in Brookline with economic disaster.
We should organize a counter mobilization at this clinic. I am sure
that there are hundreds here at DEC that would take a day off to
help escort people by them. We should get into the press and call
on all others to join us.
I am sure that there are enough people in the Boston area, including
the colleges to keep these clinics open. Why can't we set an example
with a Woman of Note march in support of this clinic, especially
when they mobilize to harass it.
In my opinion these people are criminals. They are bombing, they
are roughing up people, and generally intimidating.
Les
|
325.294 | | 2EASY::PIKET | I'm Handgun Control, Inc. | Fri Apr 14 1989 12:08 | 9 |
|
I heard that the city of Brookline is suing these people for all
the overtime they have had to spend on cops during the demonstrations
at the clinic. I hope Brookline wins, as it's pretty clear that
the reason they hold these demonstrations is to try and blackmail
the city into getting the clinics to close so Brookline won't face
financial ruin.
Roberta
|
325.295 | How It Was | MTWAIN::KAHN | | Fri Apr 14 1989 12:26 | 226 |
| April 10/11/12/13/14, 1989 (It's taking me a while to get this written!)
This is a very long note and I only write it because I myself can't get
enough of people's comments/reflections/memories of the event. Skip ahead
when you get bored.
I went down to DC by train on Friday afternoon to visit with some of my
family before the march. The young man I sat next to was a freshman at
Harvard. He was very supportive of our efforts even though he was only
going as far as New York. We got to reminiscing about other great events.
He didn't remember John Kennedy's death as he wasn't born yet; nor Martin
Luther King's speech - same reason (although he admitted that he could
never hear it without getting tears in his eyes). But he said he did
remember where he was when the Challenger blew up and I did, too, so we did
have a shared memory after all.
Saturday, I went to the Sackler museum on the Mall (new museum of oriental
art - HIGHLY recommended). Everywhere I went, I kept peering into women's
faces wondering if they'd come for the march. Some I thought for sure had
come to march. They looked so strong and sure of who they were and what
they wanted. Some had families and looked very traditional and I wasn't so
sure. Some were old ladies together and I wasn't sure. Everyone in white,
I was sure had come to march - but some of those white-wearers were so
unlikely looking - you know, conservative-looking.
Sunday morning was nippy so I decided to wear all my white clothes,
including those I'd planned to take back to the store if I didn't wear
them. I wore about five layers of silk and cotton tops plus long, silk
underwear, cotton slacks, and a cotton skirt over the slacks. Everything
was white so if I had to take anything off, I would still be wearing white.
A heavy cotton pullover top combined with my running shoes and lavender
belt, made a somewhat strange-looking outfit but white and warm.
If you see any pictures of the marchers, I'm the one wearing the Australian
outback hat. I got it last autumn when I visited that glorious land. It
was perfect for the day, kept the sun off, kept me warm. Plus, many people
who don't recognize it for what it is (a treasure from a faraway land),
admire it, which pleases me a lot.
My friend, Barbara Andrus (non-DECie) and I met at my subway stop. As I
walked into the station in my whites, I noticed a few other women in white,
and some men, too. I glanced at them but mainly felt shy. Barbara arrived
on schedule and I welcomed her as a fellow adventurer.
We were both now going back in the direction she had just come. She told
me a lot of people were already walking toward the Mall from stops far from
it. The subway quickly filled up with people many wearing white.
We arrived at the Washington Monument grounds around 10 am. It was hard to
find where Women of Notes was supposed to be. We didn't see many markers
- high on the hill near the Monument in section 06. We went where we
thought it ought to be but I didn't recognize anyone, so we went off to
listen to the entertainment at the corner of Constitution Ave and the first
street there. We went back and forth between 06 and the entertainment
buying buttons, reading signs, looking at the gathering crowd. I got a
golden banner which read "March for Women's Equality" and centered under it
"Women's Lives." (Many women wore them across one shoulder, around the
back, and fastened on a hip with a button that said something similar
written with lavender letters. I can't remember the word for that kind of
thing.)
A sign I saw that no one has mentioned yet - hand lettered, carried by an
older woman who seemed to be marching alone - "Read my list" - With the
names of about 25 voters who couldn't make the march listed on it.
The various groups were arranged more or less alphabetically so Women of
Note was very near the end of the march. When we got to where =wn= was
supposed to be we scrutinized people's faces. (Barbara A. had run into a
couple DECies by chance on the subway the day before and also searched for
a familiar face.) I only knew a few people by sight. Finally, I spotted a
familiar face - Barbara Bazemore. (Bb) Then Jane Halvorson, then Bonnie.
Yea! We found our group!! Everyone was so welcoming.
Then I saw our banner. It wasn't on high yet as it was so windy. =maggie
was lovingly tutelaging it. It was a _beautiful_ banner. !!_Beautiful_!!
It had a circle of bright colors at each end with the words in black in the
middle. By the time I got to sign the streamer, there was hardly any room
left on it. Today, as I write this up, I'm glad my name is on that
streamer.
When I came out of the Sackler Museum the day before, the annual Cherry
Blossom parade was just finishing on Constitution Avenue. Now I was
gathering on the same wide avenue to march myself. Each in her turn. It
gave me a feeling of - my time had come.
This parade is about us peons. Sometimes at great events I wish that I
could make a stirring speech and I fantasize about what I would say as I
wait for things to begin. But not this time. I just wanted to be a peon
today - one of hundreds of thousands of peons chanting the cadence "What
do you want?" "FREE CHOICE!" "When do you want it?" "NOW!"
People started marching around noon, I assume, although from our vantage
point high on the hill beneath the Washington Monument, I didn't see any
crowd movement for a long time. Then a large group started going
perpendicularly to us - cutting across the row we were in. Then some other
groups started to move and suddenly it looked like a movie scene of
old-time battlefields with various battalions moving incomprehensibly from
here to there in various directions following their flags/signs. Our sign
held steady for a while, then it too started to move. We followed it to
the bottom of the hill and out a very narrow break in a snow fence between
two sets of bleachers and onto Constitution Avenue.
Constitution Avenue is six lanes of traffic wide. It is _very_ wide. Plus
there are wide sidewalks for watching parades and grass lawns in front of
broad government buildings. The wide Avenue was completely filled with
marchers, from curb to curb. At two o'clock, our group hadn't even begun
to march yet. That's how many of us there were. Six lanes wide, three and
a half hours worth of people marching. Can you sense our numbers?
While waiting on the Avenue, I overheard someone asking a facilitator for
directions to their group but he said he couldn't help much anymore because
we had broken ranks and the plan wasn't what it had been.
We were at the very end of the march. If we turned around we could see an
empty street behind us. We didn't move for a long time because another
great lot of marchers had moved onto a road that was perpendicular to us
and they were going ahead of us.
Our facilitators wore purple banners that said "FACILITATOR" in black
letters. Before we started marching, they went among us gathering names so
Molly Yard (head of NOW) could count us. The police evidently make
notoriously low crowd estimates. I overheard a woman saying the police
estimated 100,000 people had been at Martin Luther King's great "I Have a
Dream" speech those many years ago but that there were a good quarter of a
million people there. I'm happy to say a goodly number of black people
were there Sunday, too, black men as well as women.
Slowly we inched forward, then we were in the intersection and began the
real march. Barbara and I are knitters and notice people's sweaters. One
woman, who was pushing an older woman in a wheel chair, was wearing such a
beautiful sweater that we went over to ask her if she'd made it. No, the
woman in the chair, her mother, had made it. So we talked about patterns
as we marched for freedom.
I'm not much of a groupie, and I tend to have a bit of claustrophobia so
when things got too close, Barbara and I drifted over to the left edge of
the march. We got behind what looked like young college women. They had a
long banner that stretched at least half way across the Avenue. At least
three of them were struggling to keep it up. The one in front of us was
slender, wearing clean, faded jeans. She had to lean to one side and sort
of jut her hip out in order to balance her pole against its weight and the
wind. Her strong, slender arms went high onto the post and she held it
securely against her body. And you could tell that there was no way that
pole was heavy for her. She reminded me so much of what I think of the
suffragettes from olden times. Young, vigorous, committed, and because of
these things perhaps, beautiful. They answered the question "What do you
want?" with the loud "FREE CHOICE!" When do you want it?" "NOW!" until
they were nearly hoarse.
At one of the intersections, a few facilitators, looking pale and worried,
started directing us to move into the next lane. Soon we came upon a line
of police standing facing us (parallel to the line of the march - not in
front of us). Horses were behind them and behind the horses, on the
sidewalk, were some anti-choicers with signs, yelling some inflammatory
things. A few marchers responded to them but not many (thank goodness).
Mostly we just chanted "FREE CHOICE!" "NOW!"
Every so often I'd look around to see where our banner was. Sometimes it
was in front of us. Sometimes we were in front. Once I couldn't find it
and started feeling panicky, then noticed it was right beside us!! I took
pictures of it but I'm not sure how they will turn out. It was so crowded
I could never get a clear shot.
One advantage about being in the back of such a long parade is the that
some of the people in the front turn back to watch. So the closer we got
to the Capitol Building, the more supporters there were cheering us and
waving to us. Some of them climbed into in the reviewing stands that were
still there from the Cherry Blossom parade the day before and acknowledged
us with claps and cheers and a radiance and joy. One woman leaned out far
over the waist-high rail clapping and cheering, her hands held high as
though to acknowledge each of us in turn. People were on the porches of
the government buildings, poles - anywhere they could get a vantage point
of height.
Being acknowledged like that by those who'd gone before was the very best
of all. There was an energy created, sustained. When we got as close to
the Capitol as we could, we too turned and welcomed those behind us. It
was too impressive for words. They/We just kept coming, cheering and
chanting "FREE CHOICE!" "NOW!" and carrying banners and filling the
Avenue from curb to curb. Old, young, black, white, college kids, families
pushing their youngest in strollers which had signs on them like "Mother of
Two - By Choice", everyone was represented. Everyone. I heard later that
every state in the union was represented. My friend's son went from
Wisconsin with his college group. That's far away.
I left when the march stopped before the speakers were finished. I
couldn't hear them and felt I'd made my point. When I got to West Falls
Church, I realized I'd given all my change (and some bills, too) to the NOW
collectors so I couldn't telephone for a ride. I was still wearing my
golden banner with the black letters "March for Women's Equality/ Women's
Lives" written on it. Plus all my buttons (about 6 - 8). As I crossed the
street in suburban Virginia, a man nearly ran me down trying to read my
banner; another honked his horn at me and waved.
I took the Night Owl that night back to Boston. The waiting room was
mobbed. I met Barbara Bazemore and Marty in the waiting room and we agreed
to visit them after we boarded. But as it turned out, we couldn't get
through as there were so many people camped out in the aisles. The train
left Union Station in DC at 10:30 pm Sunday night.
My friend Barbara A. and I ran along train to try to find a place to board
that wasn't already crowded. It was a long train. We finally came to the
end and found two seats together about a quarter of the way from the front.
Even before the train started a few people filtered down to our end looking
for seats. We felt fortunate.
At the first stop people got on for whom there were no seats so they
arranged themselves in the aisle to try to sleep as best they could. As I
started to doze off I felt something brush my arm and looked up to see the
conductor negotiating the aisle by stepping on the arms of the seats
steadying himself by holding onto the overhead luggage racks, so as not to
disturb the passengers sprawled in the aisle.
Then the conductor announced they were adding two more cars at the next
stop and the people in the aisle thinned out.
At route 128, this morning Barbara went to get us some tea for breakfast.
She overheard the conductors marveling that there were 1,000 people on the
train; it was as long as legally permitted (nine cars plus sleepers, I
think). One woman still slept in the aisle although there were some seats
available by then.
First thing I did of course was buy The NY Times and the Boston Globe to
see what they saw fit to print. The Times was best I thought. Most
accurate, most complete.
|
325.296 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Fri Apr 14 1989 12:49 | 9 |
| <** Moderator Response **>
Please could we keep this string to responses about last Sunday's
march? It really isn't fair to start pro/con arguments or using
inflammatory arguments in a string devoted to planning and reporting.
Particularly when the argument topic has strong restrictions on the
form of responses entered there. Thanks gyns & guys.
=maggie
|
325.297 | what a weekend! | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | introspection unlimited | Fri Apr 14 1989 13:27 | 15 |
|
re .295
>supposed to be we scrutinized people's faces. (Barbara A. had run into a
>couple DECies by chance on the subway the day before and also searched for
>a familiar face.) I only knew a few people by sight. Finally, I spotted a
Barbara, my sister, and myself were *helping* each other to find our proper
train/direction on the Metro Saturday afternoon, only to find out we were
all headed in the same direction(-:. Both she and I were surprised (after
talking a few moments) that we would probably be meeting again Sunday
afternoon to march with the DEC WoN delegation.
~robin
|
325.298 | | EVER11::KRUPINSKI | | Sat Apr 15 1989 18:20 | 30 |
| re .291
But not why I do.
re .292
I am not dangerous, violent, nor convicted of anything more
than a traffic ticket. I am strongly offended by your statement
that I am.
I have not broken into any clinic, nor have I broke anyone's nose,
nor do I threaten anyone with anything. I am also offended at
your statement that I am.
re .293
I am not dishonest. Nor am I dangerous. I am offended at your
statements to the contrary.
I entered a reply which in all honesty summed up my feelings in
the most inoffensive way I could find. I return I am accused of
dangerous, violent and illegal activity. Is it still any wonder
why I sometimes lose my temper, and reply in a similar manner?
re .296:
Like .290? :-) (See, some sense of humor left)
Tom_K
|
325.299 | Please take this to 183. | NEXUS::CONLON | | Sat Apr 15 1989 22:50 | 12 |
| RE: .298
Tom_K, your reply may have been written in the least offensive
way that you could find to write it, but your choice of words was
inflammatory (in your original reply in this string.)
Please honor Maggie's request in .296 to keep this string
dedicated to responses about the March (without starting pro/con
arguments involving differences in ideology.)
This is (essentially) an "experiences" note, so please respect
it and take your ideological arguments to topic 183.
|
325.301 | | EVER11::KRUPINSKI | | Sun Apr 16 1989 17:37 | 41 |
| re .299
This is my fourth reply in this string. I hope it is my last.
The first, (.8) was to respond to an inflammatory entry (.3).
If you have a complaint, it should be to the author of .3, not me.
The second, (.286) was to express my feelings about the topic
event. Others who did not directly participate had done so. I do
not see any reason for singling out a particular person for doing
so. I waited quite a time after the event before entering
a reply, because it took that long for me to find a way of saying
what I felt in a way that would be as low key as possible.
The third (.298) was to voice objections to offensive statements. I did
not escalate the discussion, even though I have cause to. I believe
this is in accordance with the request in .296. I was not
argumentative, but others chose to be argumentative. Who gets beat on?
Neither .286, .298 nor this reply have made ideological arguments.
re .300
Tom_K's Criminal record:
Nov ?? 1982 (I think) Parking ticket. My landlord was
re-surfacing the driveway, and I parked in the street
in front of the house. I had forgotten that the winter
parking ban had begun.
Nov ?? 1982 (I think) A few days later. Operating an
unregistered vehicle. I had registered the car in Sept,
and forgot that the registration expired the next month.
In 33 years, I've forgotten a couple of dates. And made restitution
to society for these terrible and dangerous crimes. I really don't
think that is what comes to mind when someone says that someone is
"convicted". As for the comparison to Al Capone, I think I'm
offended again, but I might just be simply astounded.
Tom_K
|
325.302 | Missed WoN | CLOSET::TAYLOR | | Mon Apr 17 1989 10:50 | 25 |
| I'm so happy that I found this note! I was also at the march, but I didn't
know there was such a group of Womennoters down there! I spend most of my
noting time in Parenting, and only check into Womannotes occasionally so I
missed all the excitement here! I really wish I knew about this
organization ahead of time so I could have met all of you. Maybe there will
be another time?!?
I belong to NH NOW, and thanks to Judy Blachek I had all the information
needed to meet the NH group. I was actually vacationing at my parent's
house in Raleigh, NC so I drove up from there with my 22 year old sister -
a student at Appalachian State in Boone, NC.
I am SOOO glad I went. I think the march is going to be the highlight of
1989 for me. The energy, the joy, the chills...
I find it amazing that so many people did make it to the march in spite of
the little bit of publicity. Did anyone hear about the TV ad NOW had put
together? Unfortunately they made it controversial, so the stations
wouldn't air it.
One other thought. I can't forget about all the lost children. At one point
in the afternoon they said the list of lost children was so long they
couldn't announce all the names. Instead they told everyone to meet at the
portojohns. I hope all the children found their parents without too much
anxiety.
|
325.304 | Thought you would be interested... | CURIE::TZELLAS | Set Def [Atlantic.City] | Tue Apr 18 1989 10:11 | 9 |
|
The April 24, 1989 issue of People Magazine has an article and
and pictures (mostly of Celebs) of the march.
Kathi
|
325.305 | Changes in public awareness since the March... | NEXUS::CONLON | | Tue Apr 18 1989 10:33 | 38 |
| One thing I've noticed on Cable's Headline News is that the
March (and the whole Pro-Choice movement) seem to be getting
a lot more airtime (even without any furthur demonstrations on
our part.)
They reported a few days ago that the press seems to be having
difficulty over the terms to use for each side - [that sounds
kinda familiar] - and that Pro-Life factions are complaining now
that the press sort of deliberately calls the Pro-Choice movement
whatever we want to be called (while calling the Pro-Life movement
"anti-abortion," which sounds a lot more negative than PRO-CHOICE.)
When pressed (no pun intended) to call the Pro-Choice movement
"pro abortion," the press STILL tends to use phrases like "those
who favor legalized abortion" or "abortion rights advocates"
(which Pro-Life groups claim is STILL an attempt on the part
of the Press to show the Pro-Choice movement in a more positive
light than the Pro-Life movement.)
When the poll came out that showed that a majority of Americans
favor legalized abortion, Headline News claimed that public
opinion was in the process of turning more towards Pro-Choice
than Pro-Life (even though many of the people being polled don't
actually approve of abortion itself.)
These were stories (about the movement) that came up on their
own (without being the result of any new demonstrations on either
side.)
The March has definitely brought attention to some of the issues
involved in the movement. (Some of the recent news items sound
so much like things we've debated here that I can't *believe* I'm
really hearing them being discussed in a national news broadcast.)
The March has definitely brought us some new friends (and additional
awareness) of the Pro-Choice movement.
Your marching has made a huge difference!!! Thank you all again!!!
|
325.306 | Clippings from the Post | SKYLRK::OLSON | Doctor, give us some Tiger Bone. | Tue Apr 18 1989 14:08 | 13 |
| I've just received clippings from the Washington Post 10 April edition
(the day after the march). We made front page in three of the four
sections (Front page, national news, 2 articles; Style section,
celebrity and people issues, 2 articles; Metro section, on the city
impact, 1 article.) There were 5 or 6 photos, including at least
two panoramas showing the huge crowds covering the west lawn of
the Capitol and jamming Constitution and Pennsylvania as far back
as the camera could show. The article on the front page mentioned
the "few hundred counter demonstrators" and the dispute over whether
it was "only" three hundred thousands of us or more. Since I missed
all the tv coverage, these clippings really brought it all back.
DougO
|
325.307 | Hello from Ann | TUT::LEACH | | Thu Apr 20 1989 14:45 | 48 |
|
From Ann
The march was one of most heart-warming experiences I've ever had!
Wanted to get back into Notes much earlier, but managed to get the
flu by Tuesday (no connection with the march -- I'm sure!)
This is to say Hi to Maggie, and congrats again on that beautiful
banner. Maggie, I'm in your building at Tut:: and would love to
show you the pix. But our system has been crazy and we haven't
been able to send mail all week. Mail me or call at 62063 if you'd
like.
Kate, guess what. The pix outdoors on Sunday came out great, but
not, alas, the pix of our pre-march dinner. Wanted to go the the
Womannotes party to show you the pictures, but succumbed to this
awful bug and missed it. Shoot!
Am looking for two things, if anyone has them:
Names of the courageous Congresspersons who spoke at the rallies
(before and after). Would like to send thanks.
Address for the tape of above speeches. NOW passed out a form which
I saw, but don't have a copy of. Maybe you can just give me the
address, somebody, if you have it.
The battle is joined! Gov. Gregg of NH has just vetoed a prochoice
bill passed by both houses in NH. Tragic.
Do the pols have any understanding of the political uprising that's
underway. For each of the 600,000 (it was 600,000) in Washington,
we all know how many people stood behind us at home. If you add
ten supporters to each marcher, you have 6 million people already,
and I think that's a low estimate.
Women just aren't mechanical baby-making machines. Or does that
come as news to anybody here???
It was so great to meet all the Womannoters down there -- and so
many supportive men. Especially hello again to our dinner group
that made it to the Hyatt in spite of exhausting trip.
Ann
|
325.308 | Banner picture, please | MORO::NEWELL_JO | Replies, they don't come easy | Thu Apr 20 1989 16:12 | 15 |
| Is there anyone who could send me a picture of the banner?
I'm way out here in California and we seem to miss out on so much.
I'd like to put the photo up in my office to remind everyone that
Digital people support worthy causes and how important 'Women of
Note' are.
Thanks,
Jodi-
|
325.309 | Local news coverage | ASABET::K_HAMILTON | Karen Hamilton - Activist! | Thu Apr 20 1989 17:09 | 17 |
| Hello all. A little info to add. Mike Gallagher, a reporter for the
Beacon (a local weekly paper) who was on one of the Worcester, MA
buses, wrote a very good, thoughtful article that was published in
the April 16 Sunday Independent. It was his first demonstration
of any kind, and his first trip to D.C. He was quite impressed.
Two things he mentioned -- he'd been told that the media would report
no more than 250,000 even if the crowd was obviously larger. USA
Today reported the growd at 250,000. He was also angry at the
superficialty of the reporting in the Boston Globe. He didn't go
to see celebrities, and he didn't think the rest of us did either.
Neither was he interested in what they were wearing. I took a look
at People Magazine today, and although they did show just how large
the crowd was, they also featured the celeb's fashions. Time to
write letters to editors.
Karen
|
325.310 | beautiful banner! | CLOSET::TAYLOR | | Wed Apr 26 1989 01:49 | 8 |
| I just came from the Nashua NOW meeting where people brought their
pictures from the march.
I wasn't even part of the making of the Women of Note banner,
but I have to say that it was BEAUTIFUL, and made me proud of the
Women at DEC. Seeing that picture of the banner brought tears to my eyes!
Gale
|
325.311 | Reminder: | PROSE::BLACHEK | | Mon May 01 1989 14:06 | 7 |
| Tomorrow, Tuesday, May 2, is the meeting to share our march
experiences.
We are meeting from 11:00 to 1:00 in the Euler room, ZK2-2. Bring
your march memorabilia and your lunch.
judy
|
325.312 | Why did they march? | IMGDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Wed May 17 1989 16:54 | 12 |
| This coming Sunday, May 21st, the March will be the subject of the
service at First Parish Unitarian-Universalist in Bedford, Mass.
Quite a few people from 1st Parish went to Washington and they have
prepared this Sunday morning service as a way of sharing their
experience with those who had to stay at home. The service starts at
10:00 and lasts about an hour, followed by coffee and a moderated
discussion period until noon.
First Parish is the big white Church on the common in the middle of
town. You can't miss it. Come and join us for a lively discussion.
|
325.313 | Hey, folks we made Ms.! | VAXRT::CANNOY | despair of the dragons, dreaming | Wed Jun 21 1989 21:12 | 7 |
| I just got the August Ms. On page 38-39 there is a two page photo of
the march. On page 38 near the top and on the right-hand side, if you
know what it looks like, you can see the Woman of Notes banner. I
spotted it because I recognized the rainbow circle pattern. For those
of you who don't know what it looks like, it's about 1 inch below the
blue and white striped tent. You can see the circle of women on it who
are all the colors of the rainbow.
|