T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
14.1 | (Credits) | MOSAIC::TARBET | | Tue May 31 1988 16:50 | 1 |
| I think Liz Augustine was the first to propose this one.
|
14.2 | muscles on women | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Jun 10 1988 17:11 | 21 |
| I had a really good experience at the local bookstore the other
day. I found a copy of Gayle Oleankava's book _Go For It!_ on the
remainder table (not surprising as it was a best seller in 1979).
Gayle, for those of you who aren't familiar with her, is a
Canadian athlete who has been outstanding in a number of sports;
she was once one of the top three in women's marathoning and has
won bodybuilding contests. She's always been one of my heros. The
cover shows a full color picture of Gayle running along the beach
with her blonde hair flowing and her muscles rippling. Talk about
female power!
Anyway, I took it to the counter to the pimply 17-year-old boy
trying to stay awake beside the cash register. He picked the book
up, looked at the cover picture with interest, and showed it to
the other cashier. "Look at that," he said warmly. "Isn't she
beautiful?" (And no, he was not being sarcastic.)
I left feeling a lot better about the future of the world.
--bonnie
|
14.3 | Is this good news or what? | YODA::BARANSKI | The far end of the bell curve | Fri Jun 17 1988 18:09 | 21 |
| I'm not sure if this belongs in this or the previous note...
CHURCH GROUP PLANS TO BURN DEVILISH TOYS
[Boston Globe 6/16, from UPI newsfeed]
PACE, Fla. - Church members plan to build a bonfire Friday night to
burn toys and records they believe are inspired by the devil, but an
opposition group promises a bucket brigade.
Leaders of the Pace Assembly of God Church, northeast of Pensacola,
plan to burn rock 'n' roll records, plastic Smurfs, Barbie dolls and
Masters of the Universe toy figures in the bonfire.
A visiting Dallas preacher, Phil Phillips, said Barbie dolls are bad
because they create unreal expectations about beauty.
But a group opposed to the burning said it will form a bucket brigade
to put out the fire, seting up the possibility of conflict between
the groups.
|
14.4 | | MSD33::STHILAIRE | Best before Oct. 3, 1999 | Mon Jun 20 1988 12:26 | 7 |
| re .3, I think the burning is bad news and the fact that there are
people actively opposing it is good news. I know that the guy said
that Barbie dolls create unreal expectations but it doesn't offset
the bad vibes I get from people burning rock'n'roll records.
Lorna
|
14.5 | | AHAB::THIBAULT | Life's a glitch | Mon Jun 20 1988 12:57 | 4 |
| smurfs? what could be wrong with a smurf? personally, I'll place my
money on the bucket brigade..
Jenna
|
14.6 | what's wrong with a smurf | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Mon Jun 20 1988 13:01 | 12 |
| The smurf show teaches total reliance on a paternal dictator,
that's what's wrong with them.
Every time papa smurf goes away, the bad boys and girls get
into trouble, and Papa has to come and bail them out.
UGGGHHHH!
But I wouldn't burn them, either -- this is a free country and
there is free speech.
--bonnie
|
14.7 | Some progress... | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Thu Jul 07 1988 10:35 | 14 |
| I just got a catalog of children's toys (I don't know how I end
up on these lists -- the kitties sure don't appreciate the stuff
they're selling!). Anyways, they had lots of "traditional" toys
with surprising pictures. In one scene, they're selling a pretend
kitchen set, and there's a little boy pulling a cake out of the
oven. In other scenes,
- a girl is wearing a belt with carpenter's tools
- a girl is bringing flowers to a boy who's playing inside a toy
- a girl and boy are building with cardboard bricks.
They still don't have pictures of little boys wearing costumes,
but nonetheless I count this as progress.
Liz
|
14.8 | wow!!!!!!!!!!! | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Jul 08 1988 10:01 | 3 |
| My God, yes! What is this catalog? I want one, I want one!
--bonnie, who has a son who likes to cook
|
14.9 | There's good news and. . . | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Fri Jul 15 1988 14:26 | 17 |
| The good news:
The March 14th issue of Sports Illustrated's cover story is
about Pam Postema who is the only woman umpire in pro baseball.
The bad news:
On page 4 of the same issue, there are a couple of letters
bemoaning the fact that only one picture each of Karen Alexander
and Cindy Crawford modelling skimpy bathing suits. No doubt
SI didn't want to lose those two readers - they published
two more pictures of the same ilk.
Plus �a change, plus �a m�me. . .
Steve
|
14.11 | who? | TFH::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Tue Jul 19 1988 19:25 | 9 |
| re .10:
Please excuse my ignorance: who's Stanley?
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
14.13 | Boy, does *that* make me feel old! | VALKYR::RUST | | Tue Jul 19 1988 20:20 | 12 |
| Stan Olsen is Ken's brother, and had the honor (?) of wearing badge
number 3. (Ken's got #1, of course, and there's some sort of story
about why Stan didn't get #2, but that's long before even *my* time.)
Stan left the company a couple of years ago; I paid little attention
to the details, I fear, and I don't know what he's doing now.
(Loved the ad, by the way. We've come a long way, and the company
compares very well with most other employers, but there's still
room for improvement...)
-b
|
14.14 | Well, it IS true in a way! | SCRUFF::CONLIFFE | Better living through software | Tue Jul 19 1988 21:10 | 4 |
| I remember Stan leaving, if only because of a big headline in one of
the "yellow technical papers" which read
"Olsen to leave Digital... story page 7"
|
14.15 | Maybe I need a dose of the DEC_HISTORY file | AITG::INSINGA | Aron K. Insinga | Fri Jul 22 1988 00:21 | 14 |
| Ken, Stan, and Harlan Anderson were the original founders of DEC, and Harlan
was the Vice President, so maybe he was badge #2. All of them (along with
some [if not all?] of DEC's original set of engineers) worked at the MIT
Computer Laboratory on Whirlwind and then at MIT Lincoln Laboratory. [Source:
Computer Engineering: A DEC View of Hardware Systems Design; Bell, Mudge,
McNamara; Digital Press, 1978; pp 123, 129.] Anyway, when a company is that
small, and when you're with it for that long, you find yourself doing lots of
different things, I presume. I heard a story that Stan issued a memo that
they'd finally made the Mill secure (locking all the random doors, putting in
guard stations, and whatnot), so there would be no more unauthorized removal
of equipment. This was Friday afternoon. On Sunday morning, he found a
compelte system up and running on the front porch of his house. (Probably a
PDP-8/something.) Okay, enough with the apochryphal stories, I can hear you
say... Sorry for the digression.
|
14.16 | She = Doctor | NSG022::POIRIER | Suzanne | Fri Jul 22 1988 09:40 | 16 |
| I am currently taking a class in real estate in which they switch
teachers about every week. We have had some real duds and being such a
twit that I am I noticed that every single teacher used 'Male'
examples. "If he wanted to buy this house..." "If his buyer...."
etc.
Well last night we had this new professor - He was great but not only
was he interesting and knowledgeable he kept using "Male" and "Female"
examples. His first example was "Say a bright young doctor just out of
medical school wanted to buy a house but SHE had all of these school
loans, what type of mortgage would SHE need?" I almost fell out
of my chair - made me realize how little you hear "She" and "Doctor"
used together.
Well I guess it doesn't take much to thrill me but I thought this
was so pleasant on the ears, I was thrilled!
|
14.17 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Tue Aug 02 1988 10:35 | 11 |
| re: .-1
Thanx Suzanne. I'm having an awful day, but you reminded me of something.
I almost always use she in my memos and designs when talking about a person.
Sometimes its to balance things out, and sometimes its to try to piss someone
off, but mostly its 'cause I'm still playing with the concept myself.
Well, these two guys and I are trying to hammer down a design alternative
so I can get on with my work. And one of them sends out a rebuttal on the
other, and it used she! He's won my heart :-)!
Mez
|
14.18 | young woman gets check, film at eleven | CIVIC::JOHNSTON | I _earned_ that touch of grey! | Mon Aug 08 1988 17:59 | 14 |
|
My parents were up to visit in mid-May, bringing with them my
2-year-old niece [sans Mama, no less, but that's another story]
and the four of us went out to lunch at Nickels in Merrimack, NH.
To all intents and purposes, we looked like a _very_ prosperous
couple in their early sixties and the single mother of a two-year-old.
At the end of the meal, the waitress brought *me* the check.
Ann
[then, of course, my father tossed his VISA over and spoiled the
moment...]
|
14.19 | Yale's athletic teams | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Wed Aug 17 1988 19:04 | 6 |
| When I was at Yale, there was a hockey team, a basketball team, a
woman's hockey team, and a woman's basketball team. They now have
men's hockey, men's basketball, woman's hockey, and woman's
basketball teams. Even Yale bends slightly with the times.
--David
|
14.20 | Arlo and Janis 8/17/88 | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Thu Aug 18 1988 10:23 | 8 |
| There's a comic strip in the B. Globe that I enjoy, Arlo and Janis.
A & J are young-ish and married and usually do ok. Here's yesterday's
strip (without illustrations):
Panel 1: Arlo watching t.v.
Panel 2: Arlo to Janis: "I just saw this 'Arrid' commerical on tv..."
Panel 3: A: "Some guy says a woman who sweats isn't sexy."
Panel 4: A: "Wonder how he feels about eating and breathing".
|
14.21 | notes have been moved, back to your reg topic | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Sat Sep 03 1988 14:56 | 9 |
| I have moved (finally) all the sweat/perspiration/glow notes
to a new note. Sorry to have been so long in my housekeeping
chores! :-)
Can we return this note to 'There's hope yet topics"
thanks
Bonnie J
|
14.22 | National Library Association scores one | TIMNEH::TILLSON | Sugar Magnolia | Wed Sep 07 1988 15:22 | 25 |
|
I saw a wonderful commercial while I was hanging around wathcing
the tube this weekend...
A little girl, about 7 or 8 years old, and her father, both wearing
blue jeans and surrounded by fishing paraphenalia, are standing in a
stream. The girl tells her dad just exactly what kind of bait she's
using and just exactly where she has to cast her line. Then she
gets a bite and pulls out a great big trout. Her father, who has
yet to get a nibble, says, "Where did you find all that stuff out?"
She looks at him, smiles, and says, "At the library."
The scene then cuts to a lodge, where the little girl is asleep
on the floor in a sleeping bag. Dad is sitting up in *his* sleeping
bag, reading his daughter's book on trout fishing and looking proudly
at his sleeping daughter. The voice-over talks about how important
it is to for children to read.
I thought this was a *terrific* commercial; it showed a father in
the primary parental role (no mom in sight) and it showed a little
girl fishing, traditionally thought of as being "boy stuff" and
being *successful* at it. Sure gave me the warm fuzzies...
Rita
|
14.23 | "Just do it." | BOLT::MINOW | Fortran for Precedent | Thu Sep 08 1988 13:32 | 10 |
| Has anyone noticed the new Nike tv campaign, showing a not exactly young
woman running up a hill. Voice says she use to smoke, etc, and started
jogging. Ended up winning the New York Marathon at age 42 (Priscilla
Welch, in case you're wondering.)
The other ad shows a old geezer (82?) jogging along. He runs 17 miles
per day. His friends ask him whether his teeth chatter in the winter.
"Nope, I leave them in the locker."
Martin.
|
14.24 | Why not before? | GADOL::LANGFELDT | Anita Vacation | Tue Sep 27 1988 09:52 | 8 |
|
From the Vogon News Service, Tuesday, Sept. 27th.
UK News
-------
BBC to ban televising of beauty contests after "Miss World" in
December.
|
14.25 | | COGMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri Sep 30 1988 16:42 | 6 |
| Re: .24
>-< Why not before? >-
If it's run anything like American television, they've probably
sold all the advertising time.
|
14.26 | Speaking of GOOD Ads... | HYEND::JRHODES | | Tue Oct 11 1988 14:41 | 8 |
| There is a truck commercial (I can't think of which one) which shows
a woman taking her son to day-care - she appears to be on her way
to work - and all of a sudden she stops and says something to the
effect of "let's not go to day-care/work today..."
The ad ends up with both mother and young son fishing together.
No father mentioned, no other adult male role model mentioned....
|
14.27 | Another good ad | PSG::PURMAL | Formality is anger with its hair combed | Wed Oct 26 1988 12:26 | 6 |
| The current issue of PARENTS magazine has an ad for the
Fischer-Price toy vaccum. The pictuer shows a little boy and a
little girl. The girl is seated in an easy chair reading the Wall
Street Journal and the boy is playing with the vaccum.
ASP
|
14.29 | | DINER::SHUBIN | A thousand pints of lite. | Thu Oct 27 1988 13:47 | 19 |
| re: .28
> There are some people who would claim, if the ad's roles were
> reversed, that this is a typical product of the "keep women in the
> house" mentality.
>
> -mike z
You're right, and I'd be one of them.
Anyway, that's the point -- they *didn't* do the usual, stereotypical,
thing. They reversed the usual roles to show that boys and girls can do
what has typically been reserved for the other sex.
Until there's real equality between the sexes, there's always going to
be a problem when there's one male and one female in an ad. People will
either cry "Stereotype!" or "How progressive!". One day, we won't even
notice...
-- hs
|
14.30 | Maternity Leave | BOLT::MINOW | Repent! Godot is coming soon! Repent! | Wed Nov 09 1988 20:01 | 36 |
| A new Apple Macintosh ad shows a hugely pregnant woman going out to the
car with her co-workers:
"It was a great shower."
"When are you due again?"
"The doctor says the tenth, but somehow I think I'll be early."
"So, who's taking your place on the Gail Harper project?"
"No one."
"So, there goes that piece of business."
"No."
"But, who's going to coordinate Houston and Chicago?"
"Me, I'll be back to work in a week."
"What? I thought you said you're going to take three months off!"
"I am."
"You think you can run a ten million dollar account from the nursery?"
"No, I think I'll do it from the den."
-----
While I it's nice to see women in positions of responsibilty, I'm not sure
whether I completely agree with the supermom attitude that she can take care
of a newborn and a $10 million account at the same time.
Martin.
|
14.31 | Here comes SUPERWOMAN?? | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Thu Nov 10 1988 10:45 | 30 |
| Well, Martin, how about if *you* take care of her newborn baby, while
*she* takes care of the $10M account?? ;-) ;-) ;-)
/Charlotte
I was just thinking last night of how I should enter a note about how
even I sometimes get tired of playing "superwoman" - and I don't even
have any kids! It is tough to have a challenging career, be involved
in several different sorts of committee and volunteer work, have lots
of interesting hobbies, and still manage to have food on the table,
clean clothes for the household to wear, and not live in a pigpen (OK,
OK, I care more about that than Paul does - my own mother is a very
meticulous housekeeper, and I never learned to have a high tolerance
for filth or clutter - anyhow, not cleaning the place aggravates my
allergies since I am allergy to dust and mold, and I can't find needed
objects when the clutter gets too bad). So far, we manage it. The
white clothes laundry went into the dryer just before work this
morning, we will stop at the fish store right before it closes tonight
to pick up the week's fish (we eat a lot of fish) and a sympathy card
for a DECcie friend whose mother died yesterday, then go home and bake
bread, cook and eat dinner, iron, mend, and put away clothes, and
retrieve a borrowed piece of equipment from a friend's house about half
an hour's drive from our place (we need the thing tomorrow). Makes for
a hectic evening, but it will allow for a more interesting weekend than
if we spent it doing housework! Oh, well, my mother never said that
life would be easy...
It's somewhat hectic, but it beats spending my whole life doing
*nothing but housework* - YAWN!! Wouldn't it be nice to be $wealthy$ and
have live-in help to do all the dull-but-necessary stuff...?
|
14.33 | | EVER11::KRUPINSKI | Warning: Contents under pressure | Thu Nov 10 1988 12:06 | 12 |
| Having been a kid of many years experience, I can safely
say that taking care of a a kid is a lot of work. It is very
possible that some, perhaps many people, whether men or women,
are not capable of coping with a kid and a job at the same time.
I highly suspect I couldn't. But it is not implausible to believe
that there are many people can do both. And if this particular
woman, can, had she not chosen to devote a portion of her energy
to raising a child, perhaps instead of managing a ten million
dollar account, she might be running the whole company.
Tom_K
|
14.34 | TMJ tangent | STAR::LTSMITH | Leslie | Thu Nov 10 1988 13:28 | 23 |
| Tangent alert: TMJ issues
Clenching and grinding your teeth is a serious issue. Having coped with it
for the last 15 years (can you say *stress*?), I urge anyone who is
susceptible to it to consult their doctor and/or dentist.
So what are the symptoms? For me it was severe ear pain. Turns out the
nerve from jaw clenching ends in the ear. Luckily this isn't as common for
me as it was in high school; its the worst ear ache you've ever had and
lasts for days/weeks.
Another symptom is grinding your teeth. I've ground mine so severely the
dentist is worried that they may not hold up for a life time. Where most
people have points on their teeth for chewing tough food, I have smooth
places. Luckily it hasn't gotten any worse in the last six years. I have
a dentist who has fitted me with a mouth guard for when I sleep. (Now
before you say, 'how's the football game?', read on.) Its a small guard
that fits the upper teeth so any grinding grinds plastic away not teeth.
Turns out I very rarely grind my teeth any more because the guard has
taught me how to sleep without clenching the jaw.
So folks, relax, as they say. Stress can be conquered, and once done, you
have the techniques for life.
|
14.35 | 60 Minutes | NSG022::POIRIER | Happy Holidays! | Wed Nov 30 1988 14:19 | 24 |
| 11/27/88 "60 Minutes" - they had a very heart warming story of a
female coach for a male basketball team. Seems she has turned the
team around in basketball and academics. She seems to be a very
caring person, she cares about the players as a team and as
individuals. Some players say she kept them in school by giving
them something that motivates them. One player actually said that
if it weren't for her he would probably be out on the streets right
now getting into trouble. Now he's doing better academically and
wants to go to college.
A local high school sports reporter was asked if she was a well liked
coach. He replied that many of her fellow male coaches are jealous
"'cuz she kicked their butts!"
Well they won the semi-finals for the city championship for the first
time in the schools history. They lost in the finals - but they are
shooting for it again this year.
When one of the players was asked if their coach was like a mother,
he replied "No, she's like a sister and a friend."
It was a great story.
Suzanne
|
14.36 | Tin Grins are in ! | BARTLE::GRYNIEWICZ | | Mon Dec 05 1988 13:45 | 18 |
| RE: .34
Yes TMJ is very serious, ask me I know....Leslie you sure were lucky
to escape with only a mouth guard.....I however wasn't, I mean it
is not all bad but I can't wait til it is over.....I am in the 9th
month of braces with a possible 21 months left, and a year and a
half ago I underwent surgery to widen the upper jaw to help balance
the size of my mouth. Now we are just closing up any spaces between
the teeth that occured from surgery.
I urge anyone who has any symptoms such as tightness, ear aches,
stiff necks.....just have your dentist check it out after 4 years
of off and on pain it feels great to wake up without headaches,
neckaches or any other symptom of TMJ.....
TammyG
|
14.37 | oops again...really, its US Air! (not Alaskan) | SKYLRK::OLSON | green chile crusader! | Mon Dec 12 1988 00:06 | 23 |
| [in California radio advertising]
[jazz bass guitar and keyboard background, syncopated driving beat]
telephone rings...
[Jenny] Susan Kim's Office...
[Susan Kim] Jenny, I'm still in San Diego. Could you check my
schedule and see what the week looks like?
[Jenny] Well, Tuesday you're in Los Angeles, Wednesday in
Sacramento, then back to Orange County on Thursday...
[voiceover] When you're doing business in California, its good
to know that American Express and Alaska Airlines do
business *all* *over* California. [sales pitch continues]
[Jenny] Then next week you start out in Fresno, then ...[fades]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Perfectly matter-of-fact presentation of a business executive working
with her secretary, doing the modern flight routine...
DougO
|
14.38 | Interesting Come On Advertisement | BOLT::MINOW | | Tue Jan 03 1989 13:19 | 14 |
| I dunno, this probably belongs in the Sexism note, ... but Barnes and Noble
(remainder booksellers) has an ad in today's Globe for their catalog.
In big letters, it trumpets "An Illustrated History of Bordellos" (or
somesuch: I forgot the real title), which is a kind of illustrated
tour of backroom New Orleans (courtesans who become princesses; princesses
who become courtesans, that sort of stuff).
Another book they saw fit to mention in their ad is Suzanne Hayden Elgin's
"The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-defense", which has been mentioned favorably
several times in this notesfile.
So, hold your noses and pick up a copy of their catalog.
Martin.
|
14.39 | I forgot to mention... she was the goalie! | IAMOK::GONZALEZ | | Thu Jan 05 1989 20:26 | 17 |
|
When I got home this morning there I became entranced with
a captivating movie on HBO. It was about am attractive
young woman (approx. 15 or 16 years old) whos moved with
her sister and mother to a new home in Canada. The town
did not have much to offer in after-school activities
except sports. Since she had played hockey for the women's
team at her old school she decided to try out for the team
albeit it was a men's team. She made the team (and of course
the team went on to take the league trophy). None of the roles
were stereotypical and though the plot was slightly predictable
the production was nicely done.
Sorry I didn't catch the name of it. Maybe some co-noters have
seen it and can add some info.
Luis
|
14.40 | re. last\ | SA1794::CHARBONND | I'm the NRA | Fri Jan 06 1989 06:12 | 4 |
| The film is called "Hockey Night." I caught it a few months back.
The only actor I can remember was Rick Moranis as the coach who
stood up for her.
|
14.41 | | CADSE::SHANNON | look behind you | Fri Jan 06 1989 06:14 | 10 |
| The name of the movie is "Hockey Night".
It was a pretty realistic movie, with a couple exceptions.
I wished they hadn't won it all, and they would not have skated
off "protesting" the game like they did at the end.
But overall it was a good story.
mike
|
14.42 | | IAMOK::KOSKI | suggestions welcome | Fri Jan 13 1989 12:57 | 10 |
| I saw a great ad in last week in Business Week, it really put a smile
on my face and I wanted to share it here.
I believe it was for a brandy, A nice looking woman took up most
of the page, she was in black & white, the glass of brandy was in
color. The words were on the top also in b&w "I love museums. I've
been to Cooperstown twice". If you don't know what Cooperstown is
then the ad wasn't aimed at you...
Gail
|
14.43 | A metaphor | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Tue Mar 07 1989 12:10 | 9 |
| From a Digital internal publication, "The Vector" Volume 4, Number
3, page 4:
"... It's like tapping into the energy generated by the USA
women's four by one-hundred relay team at Seoul. Once it
gets started it moves on its own power and gains momentum
and speed with each tick of the clock."
Ann B.
|
14.45 | They chose the best | BOLT::MINOW | Why doesn't someone make a simple Risk chip? | Tue Mar 07 1989 15:34 | 8 |
| re: .44:
This may be a dumb question, but wouldn't that same paragraph,
minus "women's" be less sexist?
I think the men only took a silver medal.
M.
|
14.46 | | 2EASY::PIKET | | Tue Mar 07 1989 15:37 | 9 |
|
I'd like to think of it as a form of affirmative action. We've been
so inundated with images of male athletes that if the word "women"
weren't there, most people would probably visualize a man's team.
This balances out people's awareness, much the way aa is supposed
to balance out opportunities (I slipped in "supposed to", not because
I don't believe it does, but to hopefully avoid a rathole).
Roberta
|
14.47 | | 32291::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Tue Mar 07 1989 15:52 | 10 |
| Re: .44
>This may be a dumb question, but wouldn't that same paragraph,
>minus "women's" be less sexist?
If you mean "sexist" in terms of "distinguishing between men and
women," then yes. If you mean "sexist" in terms of "derogating
members of one gender," then no. It sounds like the article was
making reference to a specific event, in which case "women's" is
a necessary qualifier.
|
14.49 | What are you trying to say? | NEXUS::CONLON | | Tue Mar 07 1989 21:34 | 12 |
| RE: .48
> If the word "women's" was replaced with "men's", would
> that be sexist?
The author of the quote was referring to a specific team
in a specific event. In a case like that, why would it
be sexist whether the team mentioned had been "men's" or
"women's"?
What is your point, Mike Z.?
|
14.53 | Vignette from thirtysomething | STAR::BECK | 2B or D4 - that is the question | Wed Mar 08 1989 11:47 | 6 |
| Vignette from last night's thirtysomething...
Hope rushes to hospital to visit ailing friend, asks duty nurse for
Dr. xxx. Nurse points down hall where man and woman are talking.
Hope approaches them, looks up at (taller) man, saying "Dr. xxx?".
Woman turns around, says "Yes?". (Hope looks slightly abashed.)
|
14.54 | the dangers of a quote out of context? | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Wed Mar 08 1989 12:12 | 14 |
| .51�Now, if it is the quote in .43 is not sexist, why is it not sexist?
.51�And would the same hold true for the same quote with "women's"
replaced by "men's"?
It rather depends on what the ellipsis in the quote represents.
If it is a reference to a female achievement or an achievement of
the female half of the human race then a reference to a very succesful
female sports team may be an appropriate metaphor.
If it does not have such a context then it may well be sexist.
/. Ian .\
|
14.55 | Context(s) | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Wed Mar 08 1989 12:46 | 39 |
| Mike,
You are probably acutely aware that lists of names are stored and
read by humans in alphabetical order. Let us call this alphabeticism.
Should you come upon someone who took up a list of names, and began
reading, "Mike Zarlenga? ("Here.") Joe Young? ("Here.") Pat
Weaver? ..." would you call this person an alphabeticist or a
non-alphabeticist? (Your answer will in no way imply that you
condone this word, of course. :-)
Ian,
The preceding sentence is, "Distributed Project Implementation (DPI)
is a reality, and is awesome in the magnitude of deliverables that
can be realized." I cannot be prefectly certain without the use
of a pronoun, but I do believe the subject is neuter. (I'm certainly
feeling puckish today.)
Omnes,
My belief is that the author looked for a metaphor for a bunch of
programs, each of which was a little better than Other Companies'
programs, and which together produced not a little better result,
but a significantly better result. First, he [sic] would have had
to have thought of a series of actions -- linked actions -- which
had a additive result. Perhaps he discarded the image of a series
of batteries as too technical. He thought of a relay team and
found the imaging perfect. Then he tried to think of a glittering
example of a relay team. The image he found, unsullied by drug
charges, klutzing, or losing, was of the USA women's team at Seoul.
And then -- and this is the important part -- he did not dismiss
the image as lacking appeal for his audience.� That is the absence
of sexism; he either had none in himself, or overcame it in himself,
or felt his audience had none or felt his audience could overcome
it in themselves. (That's an inclusive "or" not an exclusive one.)
Ann B.
� People willing to read about Digital Diagnostic Architecture.
|
14.56 | | 32291::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Wed Mar 08 1989 13:03 | 7 |
| Re: .48
If the word "women's" was replaced with "men's," my evaluation in
.47 would be unchanged. If the author didn't even bother to consider
women atheletes while searching for a metaphor, *that* would be
sexist (unconscious, probably, but still sexist). But the words
cannot reflect something like that.
|
14.62 | Is too! | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Wed Mar 08 1989 16:53 | 26 |
| Mike,
By answering my question, you answered your own.
I could take you to task for pre-judging the people in this file
with your comment, "But I do think that if "women's" were replaced
with "men's" that some people here might call that sexist." but
I won't.
Instead, I'll explain to you why I would indeed consider it sexism:
Here we have two relay teams, one composed of women, and one
composed of men. One team won the gold medal; one team won the
silver medal. If a metaphor, which is clearly supposed to refer
to superiority over every other entrant in the field, used the
team that did NOT display this superiority (by winning the gold
medal), then I would look askance at that metaphor. If I then found
that it referred to the team which displayed the societally-preferred
gender, then I would call it sexist.
Do you understand?
Ann B.
P.S. in advance to everyone: Please do not refer to a silver medal
winner as "second-rate", okay?
|
14.63 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Thu Mar 09 1989 05:03 | 7 |
| re .55
OK the ellipsis doesn't refer to a woman, women, or the activities
of same: therefore my impression is that in its original context
the remark was de facto sexist.
/. Ian .\
|
14.64 | Please explain. | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Mar 09 1989 11:52 | 14 |
| Ian,
Then am I correct in assuming that you believe the statement was
nationalistic because it referred to the "USA" team? And that
it was racist because it referred to the location "Seoul"? And
that it was numerist because it referred to the four by one hundred
team?
Or is it just being accurate and you object to that?
Or are you using the term "sexist" when you should be using the term
"gender-specific"?
Ann B.
|
14.65 | Get Real | 2EASY::PIKET | | Thu Mar 09 1989 12:02 | 7 |
|
I don't understand the problem here. It has already been explained
that the specific team referred to, the USA Woman's team, won a
gold medal and the men's team did not. There is no sexism here.
What is your problem?
Roberta
|
14.66 | For the record | BOLT::MINOW | I'm the ERA | Thu Mar 09 1989 12:35 | 5 |
| The USA Women's team won Gold in the 4x100 relay and Sliver in the 4x400.
The USA Men's team won gold in the 4x400 relay, but did not qualify for
the finals in the 4x100 because of an improper pass.
M.
|
14.67 | not my view, just an explanantion | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Torpedo the dam, full speed astern | Thu Mar 09 1989 12:59 | 6 |
| At the risk of explaining the obvious, my estimation of the sexist question here
hinges on the perception that if the men's relay team had been mentioned (and
had been the team that won the 4X100 relay) and the word "men's" was used it
would be considered sexist by a significant portion of the community.
The doctah
|
14.68 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Thu Mar 09 1989 13:16 | 9 |
| Re: .67
What that implies, then, is that some men believe that some (perhaps
a significant number of ) women have "sexist" as a default value
for "men." Given the number of women in the world today, I have
no doubt that some of them automatically consider men sexist. I'm
not sure how large the number is, though, or how well it applies
here. (Since I missed the entire AA argument -- praise be -- I'm
not sure how relations between the genders are going these days.)
|
14.69 | yes | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Torpedo the dam, full speed astern | Thu Mar 09 1989 15:41 | 0 |
14.70 | Strictly ho-hum. | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Mar 09 1989 17:11 | 34 |
| Before I reply, I'm going to explain part of my Philosophy of Life:
1. Do not attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity.
2. Do not attribute to stupidity what can be attributed to ignorance.
3. Do not attribute to ignorance what can be attributed to a
moment of inattention.
Thus, when I tell someone, "You just weren't paying attention.",
I am not being condemnitory; I am being reassuring. It means I
hold that person to be neither ignorant, stupid, nor malicious.
Now, if the original metaphor had been of an appropriate men's team,
I probably would not have paid any attention to it -- beyond what
I give for any good metaphor (which is a lot, I confess). If my
attention were drawn to it by someone asking, "Whadaya thinka this?",
I'd say it was a good metaphor. Someone would have to ask me about
it in the context of sexism before I would think about the use of
"men's". (So I'm dense.) And then I'd shrug, and say "It's
business as usual."
This is ambiguous. It is meant to be. It could either mean that
I felt "men's" had a fifty per cent chance of turning up, and it
had, and so what. Or it could mean that the male writer had come
up with a male image because that's all he could see. Ya tosses
yer coin and ya takes yer chances.
That a male writer could only see a male image (That this could happen
is only an hypothesis, mind.) is the *result* of sexism. I do not
see it as sexism per se. (See rules 3 through 1 above.) So if
I were asked, "Is this sexism?", I'd answer "No."
Any other opinions lying around out there?
Ann B.
|
14.71 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Fri Mar 10 1989 04:46 | 44 |
| re .64
Since you raise the point, I don't consider it racist by referring
to a place.
Nor do I see it as right wing political (Nationalist) in nature.
However the reference to an American achievement or team may very
well be a tad jingoistic, it would certainly be completely
inappropriate if the subject of the ellipsis were not an American
achievement.
And of course the original meaning of 'chauvinism' was an irrational
and overbearing form of patriotism, of the type displayed by sports
commentators of every nationality when one of their sports teams
or competitors happen to do well.
A better analogy would have been: "< xxx > was like a well disciplined
4x100m relay team..." No reference to a particular team is needed:
we all know what is involved in a successful relay team of either
sex, and any nationality.
The above may seem petty, but the quote came from a piece of internal
literature. I know these aren't intended for customers, but we all
know that customers frequently acquire them. I used to have frequent
problems when customers and prospects would complain bitterly about
the use of American English in technical documentation ("don't you
make this in English?"). Jingoistic references like the one under
discussion in sales literature could frequently produce a definite icy
feeling in the room after they saw it. We are after all a
MULTINATIONAL company, operating right around the globe, and it is
time that we started to expunge such unthinking chauvinism from
literature we produce.
No, when I read the quote, I interpreted the reference to a women's
team as sexist: positively sexist, in that I guessed that the author
was a woman. I also read it as jingoistic: I guessed that the author
was an American. Finally I read it as destructive of the international
integrity of our company as it clearly brands one of our achievements
as a singularly American one.
/. Ian .\
|
14.72 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | Words like winter snowflakes | Fri Mar 10 1989 08:32 | 5 |
| > team as sexist: positively sexist, in that I guessed that the author
> was a woman.
Gosh, I was hoping it was a man!
Mez
|
14.73 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Fri Mar 10 1989 09:01 | 24 |
|
I have no idea whether the author or the article quoted was a woman
or a man, an American or a Bantu.
However people tend to choose metaphors and similes from topics
close to their own experience. I *guessed* that choosing a parallel
with an American women's athletics team the author was probably
an American woman who had recently been watching the Olympics. I
felt an American man would be more likely to compare it to the US
4x400m men's relay team, and a foreigner would be unlikely to use
a US team at all...
Whether that is true or not, I am sure it isn't good journalism
to use constructions that leave the audience wondering about the
author, rather than the subject.
As a jingoistic reference it is also a bad metaphor from another
point of view: I didn't know that the US relay team had won that
event, had I been asked I'd have guessed that they got the bronze
(after USSR and East Germany). It isn't an immediately obvious example
of premiership, and leaving out the country reference would have
made it a more obvious one.
/. Ian .\
|
14.74 | I see. | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Fri Mar 10 1989 09:15 | 10 |
| How very interesting.
The author was Gene Somethingorother. This is a man's name, so
Mez's hope is founded and Ian's assumption is false.
Ann B.
P.S. I hope that any customer of ours who does a no-no like read
internal publications will have more sense than to complain about
an analogy buried on page 4.
|
14.75 | What are we talking about here | CADSE::ARMSTRONG | | Fri Mar 10 1989 10:37 | 7 |
|
I just can't believe this discussion.....anyone of any gender
or nationality who saw that race would have seen the
incredible power and grace in those 4 runners. This wasn't
just any victory. To reduce the metaphor to merely a relay race
destroys it.
bob
|
14.76 | Always more opinions out there | BOLT::MINOW | I'm the ERA | Fri Mar 10 1989 11:51 | 12 |
| re: .70
Any other opinions lying around out there?
Well, how about "let's use young sexy female bodies to push our product."
Ian's point about jingoism is well taken, and should be noted by anyone
writing (documentation/handouts/advertising) that are intended for
general consumption. "Pride in our Olympic Team" is all well and good,
except when you're trying to convince a customer to buy Dec instead
of Nokia/Bull/ICI/Siemens/Norsk (etc.).
Martin.
|
14.77 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | I'm the NRA | Fri Mar 10 1989 13:08 | 10 |
| This morning, the radio station had one of those ads for
technical schools - a man's voice saying "I was getting tired
of a nowhere job. I didn't like feeling lousy about my work,
embarrassed by my job. So I decided on a new career as a..."
I expected a spiel for Hartford School of Welding. Surprise !
His next word was
Nurse !
They got me again :-)
|
14.81 | Perhaps this will help... | NEXUS::CONLON | | Mon Mar 13 1989 04:44 | 27 |
| RE: .79
> I'd be surprised to find a strictly pro-male quote in
> this, the "maybe there's hope yet" topic. However, I'd
> expect to find some strictly pro-female quote touted as
> non-sexist (not in the gray area [between sexist and non-
> sexist].)
> It strikes me as odd.
Mike Z., I'm not sure what your confusion is about, but I'll
see if I can help.
In our culture, metaphors used to describe a high measure of
excellence are almost always associated with images involving
males (as if words like "excellence" and "achievement" are best
described, to their fullest extent, with the help of examples of
achievements that have been accomplished by men.)
When women's attributes are used (as examples of excellence
in some form,) the ones chosen the most often involve "women
as art" (i.e., what some women look like.)
It is unusual to see excellence described in terms of an
athletic achievement by a women's team -- so unusual and so
powerful, in fact, that Ann's example of a quote of this sort
(in .43) is still being challenged almost 40 replies later.
|
14.83 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Mon Mar 13 1989 09:19 | 39 |
|
re .78�Your clue was "who saw that race" ... Some of these noters have
�such a bad case of Notes addiction they think "watching the boob
�tube" means reading Notes (we were thinking about _one_ specific
�conference in particular). We agree whole-heartedly and assume
�that was exactly what the male intruders here intended all along.
Since I was the one (and I believe only one) who claimed not to
know who won the women's 4x100 metre athletics relay in the last
Olympics I must say that I find that statement somewhat error prone.
I have little or no interest in athletics, and what little I have
is limited to cross country running: I am bored to tears by anybody
running around a closed 400 metre oval track. I didn't watch the
Olympics largely because I find it boring but also because I was
offended by the anti-firearm attitude of the US coverage that
not only didn't schedule coverage of any of the dozen or so shooting
medals, but didn't schedule coverage of the shooting section of
the modern pentathlon.
This attitude of disinterest in athletics is unusual perhaps but
far from unique. It has nothing to do with notes addiction, but
rather an aversion to sports in which I do not now or have not in
the past competed in. As for the specific conference you have in
your mind, I do not know which you mean: perchance it isn't SOAPBOX
is it? if so you clearly aren't thinking of me in this context since
I only enter the box when somebody else points out a discussion
there that might interest me...
As for what this 'male intruder' intended, you are wrong: I replied
initially simply to report the impression the quote, taken out of
context, had on me. I then entered into a series of replies enlarging
and explaining that impression. In the end it appears I 'batted 500'
- the writer was a man, not as I guessed a woman, but was indeed an
American (an assumption on my part, but I know of no other nationality
that would deign to call its male infants '[eu]gene'.) If in doing so
I derailed this discussion I apologise: such was not my intent.
/. Ian .\
|
14.84 | rattle those pots and pans | ULTRA::ZURKO | Words like winter snowflakes | Mon Mar 13 1989 09:26 | 12 |
| OK Mike. I saw this the other day, and thought of posting it here, but didn't
think it was quite enough. I don't know how sincere I come across in notes, so
I don't know if you'll believe that, but I work on an A1 operating system
project, so the government trusts me :-).
Commercial for dish-washing detergent, featuring 2 men. It was very like the
Adam cartoon. One man washing dishes and seeing nothing wrong with it, the
other doing male-type jokes about being a wimp. Just lately I had begun to
dispair about dish washing and detergent commercials; they're all female
mothers. So I was really pleased to see that, though I thought that the
joker-friend lessened the impact.
Mez
|
14.85 | | 2EASY::PIKET | I'm Handgun Control, Inc. | Mon Mar 13 1989 09:39 | 16 |
|
Note 14.79 >
>I'd be surprised to find a strictly pro-male quote in this, the
>"maybe there's hope yet" topic. However, I'd expect to find some
>strictly pro-female quotes touted as non-sexist (not in the gray
>area).
I don't see anything sexist about being "pro-male" or "pro-female".
Personally I wouldn't want to see either become extinct.
Roberta
|
14.87 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Mon Mar 13 1989 14:01 | 9 |
| Re: .82
>Every reply by a male is to some extent an intrusion
So how does it feel, being an intruder?
>Eagles_See_Male_Presence_Here_As_Massively_Counter-Productive...
Is it just me, or is this terribly ironic?
|
14.89 | Hold it! | AQUA::WAGMAN | QQSV | Mon Mar 13 1989 16:24 | 13 |
| Re: .88 (Eagles)
> ... a bunch of grade-school-mentality noter-dweebs or ... just too
> dense to be considered childish ...
People: must we stoop to name calling here?
Can we stick to examples of non-sexist stuff, and discuss other noters and
their mentalities somewhere else? Please?
--Q
(I found it very tough not to snap at the last note here...)
|
14.90 | | MOSAIC::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Mon Mar 13 1989 16:35 | 5 |
| <** Moderator Response **>
I wholeheartedly agree with Q.
=maggie
|
14.91 | Let's distribute the blame... | 2EASY::PIKET | I'm Handgun Control, Inc. | Mon Mar 13 1989 16:36 | 19 |
|
Q,
I don't think you're being entirely fair. I think Eagles was making
a point (not in .89 but in earlier notes) about men in this
note (Mike Z et al.) being feminist-baiting. Some people did not
want to even discuss this point to determine if it had validity
or not.
I think the problem is that Eagles notes are sometimes rather cryptic
and thus his points get lost in his wisecracks.
Eagles, can you please be a little clearer? I agree with what you're
saying, but not how you say it.
Thanks.
Roberta
|
14.92 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Mon Mar 13 1989 16:37 | 6 |
| May I second Dick's request that we avoid name calling.
thanks
Bonnie J
comod
|
14.95 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Tue Mar 14 1989 09:48 | 7 |
| <** Moderator Request **>
So that we don't have to lock this topic while it's being cleaned,
would everyone please take their processing stuff to the processing
string, beginning now? Thank you.
=maggie
|
14.96 | A nice moving company..... | PNEUMA::RYAN | Some days you eat the bear | Thu Mar 23 1989 12:10 | 15 |
| My husband and I are moving next week and one of my jobs was to
call and arrange the moving company. I called and told them we were
moving, etc. Yesterday, I got a confirmation letter (addressed to
me) and they included a bunch of adress lables. The lables had
"Denise Ryan 18 Cross St"....etc printed on them. No mention of my
husband, and they didn't even put Mr and Mrs Ryan, (I *hate* being
called Mrs. Ryan, and they didn't even know that !)
(BTW, it was Mike's idea to post this note. After hearing so many
horror stories in the Sexism... note, we were expecting the worse
of the whole house-buying scene. Not one bad experience, except
the bank wanting to put the house in Mike's name "in case we get
sued, they can't take the house" [huh?] We didn't.)
Dee
|
14.97 | First impression | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Fri Mar 31 1989 18:06 | 29 |
| The following is just a sample; I've gotten a lot of this style
of announcement:
"<a few levels of forwarding removed>
From: <Whomever> 29-MAR-1989 12:10
To: @<our>_EXTENDED_STAFF.DIS
Subj: ANNOUNCEMENT
I am pleased to announce an addition to the Personnel Organization.
<Nickname Lastname> will join the <our> Personnel Staff on Monday,
April 3rd. <Nickname> will be supporting the <class> Engineering
Group and assuming other responsibilities in the ensuing weeks.
<discussion of current Personnel responsibilities removed>
I look to the <our> Personnel Consultants to provide your organizations
with responsibe service.
Best regards,
<Name>"
What gender is the new person? I don't know. I've found a whole
bunch of these memos written so that the new person is always referred
to by name (and the name is always the gender-ambiguous kind), and not
by gender-based pronoun. I like it.
Ann B.
|
14.98 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert Holt UCS4,415-691-4750 | Sun Apr 02 1989 02:57 | 5 |
|
Do women really hate themselves that much that they avoid
gender specific pronouns?
Must be, with the weird names girls are getting nowadays...
|
14.99 | What a strange thing to say. | NEXUS::CONLON | | Sun Apr 02 1989 03:03 | 12 |
| RE: .98
> Do women really hate themselves that much that they
> avoid gender specific pronouns?
> Must be...
What a bizarre accusation to make from such an isolated
example of business etiquette.
Your bias is showing, Bob.
|
14.100 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert Holt UCS4,415-691-4750 | Sun Apr 02 1989 03:10 | 4 |
|
What bias? It was only a question.
|
14.101 | It was the way the question was worded | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Sun Apr 02 1989 15:33 | 7 |
| The bias was in the assumption (in the base question) that
the use of gender neutral pronouns is the result of women's
self hatred. To my mind, I don't see much connection between
not liking to always be referred to as 'he' or 'his' in
generic documents and self hatred in women.
Bonnie
|
14.102 | Woman's marathoning in the Globe | BOLT::MINOW | Who will can the anchovies? | Fri Apr 14 1989 12:16 | 13 |
| The weekly "SportsActive" section in today's Boston Globe (14-Apr) has
a 6-7 page series of articles on women marathoning (with especial reference
to Monday's Boston Marathon), starting with several quotes from a friend of
mine, Sara Mae Berman, who won Boston 3 times before it became official,
and wore F1 the first year women were officially permitted to run.
(Feel free to ignore the article on Rosie Ruiz.)
By the way, if the weather's good on Monday (40-50 degrees), Ingrid
Kristiansson will try to break 2:20 (the woman's equivalent of the
4-minute mile).
Martin.
|
14.103 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | mud-luscious and puddle-wonderful | Mon Apr 24 1989 14:57 | 11 |
| The following is a paraphrase from memory:
"It's very rare that TV commercials show women all alone in them." says Joe.
"Hmmmm?" says Mez, who has not been paying attention to either the TV or Joe.
"That Toyota commericial showed a woman all alone in a car. Usually
commericials show women with their husbands or kids." says Joe.
"Oh, you mean that car commericial with the business-looking woman getting
somewhere reliably because of her car. Yeah. Good observation." says Mez.
Kudos to Toyota (and Joe :-).
Mez
|
14.104 | | RAINBO::TARBET | I'm the ERA | Wed May 10 1989 16:37 | 13 |
| From an article in "InfoWorld", a pc-industry trade journal:
"Picture this scenario: a key administrative aide in your company
comes down with a severe bout of the flu. Unfortunately, he is in the
middle of preparing a critical report.... Although the aide's files are
inteact and logically named, the department head realises she doesn't
have anyone on staff proficient enough...."
It was written by a woman, which diluted the impact for me, but it's
still a *great* change from what we used to...and mostly still do :-(
...find in these rags.
=maggie
|
14.105 | PC trade rags are generally OK | SYSENG::BITTLE | Nancy Bittle-Hardware Engineer,LSEE | Sat May 13 1989 23:05 | 15 |
|
Maggie,
I read a lot of the PC trade rags, and I frequently find refreshing
instances like the one you described.
The difference is very noticeable when you compare PC trade rags
to magazines like Time, Newsweek, Life, etc... (not to pick on
any of those mags in particular).
I think this is due to the relative success and influence women
have in the area of information technology. (read the credits
pages and compare)
nancy b.
|
14.107 | rationalization alert | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | I'm the NRA | Mon May 15 1989 10:48 | 5 |
| Hunh? I'd like to see a list of all three and four-digit badges
broken down by gender, then by position.
Of three people who have retired from my department in the last
few years two were women.
|
14.108 | Space: 1889 | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | I'll pick a white rose with Plantagenet. | Thu May 18 1989 13:34 | 23 |
| This is the player's guide to a role-playing game set in an
alternate reality. (Thomas Edison invented the ether flyer in
1868, and flew to Mars (with Jack Armstrong) in 1870, where they
discovered the Martian civilization. It is now 1889, many Earth
nations have colonies on Mars, and Britain's is the largest.)
The cover shows a man and woman with pistols, defending themselves
against the barbaric High Martians (not to be confused with the
civilized Canal Martians or even the rugged Hill Martians). Inside
are illustrations of men and women in roles as Foreign Office Agents,
Explorers, Dilettante Travellers, Reporters, Inventors, Doctors,
Scientists, Servants, and modelling the "Quaint Martian Costumes".
The text explains that certain roles are only open to men-characters
(i.e., not men-players), by government policy. A woman-character can
enter such a career only if she "successfully impersonat[es] a man,
which was done in this period with surprising regularity." (The
role of Adventuress is only open to women-characters, with no provision
*stated* (but the rules are very Do the Fun Thing) for impersonating
men-characters, but Adventuresses are obliged to have a low
intelligence, high status man lolling around as a "convenient facade".)
Ann B.
|
14.109 | Let her present next time? | COMET::HENNINGER | | Mon May 22 1989 11:52 | 16 |
| RE .106
Perhaps Ken would consider doing something we did in a couple military
units I have been in.
Since his secretary is so proficient, let her give the next
presentation.
Frequently our non-commissioned officers filled in for us and the
good ones did a better job as presenters than the less proficient
officer.
Don
Who knows the secretary/NCO often has a better grasp of the picture
than the boss
|
14.110 | Apple on non-sexist language | BOLT::MINOW | Who will can the anchovies? | Fri Jun 09 1989 17:34 | 28 |
| From the Apple Publications Style Guide -- a reference for Apple documentation
writers.
Fair Language: Avoid cultural biases and sterotypes, which may offend some
users of Apple products. Be aware of the variety of people who are potential
Apple customers, and write consciously to include them. Include a variety
of ethnic names in examples: not always Jones, Smith, and Johnson; sometimes
Wong, Scharanski, Katabata, Contreras, Meyer, and so on.
Include both female and mail names in examples: not always John, Jim, and
Bob; sometimes Jane and Susan (better yet, sometimes Maria, Carlos,
Yoshiko, and so on). Portray both women and men in a variety of occupations
and situations, not just stereotypic ones.
Avoid using male pronouns generically. Use "he or she," or switch to the
plural when "he or she" is awkward. Sometimes you can use the second person.
Incorrect: A programmer debugs his code...
Correct: A programmer debugs his or her code...
Better: Programmers debug their code; you debug your code.
...
Female connector: Don't use; use "socket."
Male connector: Don't use; use "plug."
Martin.
|
14.111 | | IMBACQ::SCHMIDT | Bud,Ollie down -- Ron,George to go. | Sat Jun 17 1989 08:14 | 29 |
| Martin:
> Female connector: Don't use; use "socket."
>
> Male connector: Don't use; use "plug."
This last bit strikes me as a bit much. It's also likely to
lead people astray.
o It's a bit much because here, in speaking of connectors, we're
making direct reference to things that have the important attri-
bute of gender, we're not speaking of humans (where the important
attribute is their humanity and not gender). We're also not draw-
ing any value judgements. Male connectors are no better nor worse
than female connectors and one is certainly useless without the
other.
o It's also a bit much because it does away with a nearly perfectly
obvious analogy. Consider a BC22-E Modem Extension Cable. Almost
any of us could figure out which end is the male end and which end
is the female end. I'm not sure we could unambiguously figure out
which end is the plug and which is the socket, especially when
simultaneously confronted with two more chassis-mounted connectors
on, say, a terminal and a modem.
Perhaps Apple better stick to hermaphroditic connectors.
Atlant
|
14.112 | | BOLT::MINOW | Who will can the anchovies? | Sat Jun 17 1989 10:59 | 29 |
| re: .111:
> Female connector: Don't use; use "socket."
>
> Male connector: Don't use; use "plug."
Actually, I think this is a very good idea for several reasons:
-- "male" and "female" give human (or at least living) attributes to
inanimate objects, which is not really called for.
-- "male" and "female" don't necessarily translate well, or would be
readily understood by someone whose native language is not English.
(My favorite example is trying to explain "vanilla file format" to
someone who isn't from an ice-cream culture.)
-- You can only understand "male" and "female" connectors if you assume that
the male plug goes into the female socket. I suspect that it is this
obviously sexual image that is seen as inappropriate.
It's not quite relevant, but I believe that Apple connectors generally have
(male) plugs on their cables and sockets on the computer/periferal/apparatus.
Thus, there is no real reason for someone to have to decide which end is "male"
and which end "female." Even the power cord has two plugs, even if one is
genetically "female" -- in this case, of course, the "female" plug
enters the "male" socket. At this point, the sexual labels make even
less sense.
Martin.
|
14.114 | Credit where credit is due | BOLT::MINOW | Who will can the anchovies? | Sat Jun 17 1989 17:24 | 6 |
| re: .112:
Forgot to mention: the "ice-cream culture" anecdote was told to me by
Beatrice Walther (very infrequent participant here).
Martin.
|
14.115 | EAA in OSHKOSH | TARKIN::TRIOLO | Victoria Triolo | Thu Aug 03 1989 16:53 | 9 |
|
I just got back from the EAA (experimental aircraft association)
convention in OSHKOSH, WI.
Apart from being the cleanest gathering of 1 million people I have
ever attended, Huggies had set up booths with changing tables and
free diapers for parents. It wasn't in the ladies' room.
Just found it interesting. (along with the rest of the convention)
|
14.116 | rathole alert! | DEMING::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Thu Aug 03 1989 22:06 | 4 |
| <---- did you run into Jim Lloyd???? He just bot his own 4-seater
1957 Cesna. He's boss to a few -wn-'ers, too! Neat guy!
justme....jacqui
|
14.117 | Small Victory | USEM::DONOVAN | | Fri Aug 11 1989 09:54 | 20 |
| Small victory for woman's movement!!
Sacks, who altered men's suits for free and women's suits for $40,
now decided to alter women's suits for free! It took a couple of
law suits but the decision warms the cockles of my heart.
Now, if only:
* Woman's haircuts and men's haircuts cost the same.
* Dry cleaners didn't charge twice as much for women's suits
* Insurance companies didn't require, upon confirmation of a name
change, for women to claim their husbands as drivers of their cars
when men do not have to insure thier wives as drivers of theirs.
Long way to go?
Kate
|
14.118 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Fri Aug 11 1989 11:10 | 12 |
| > * Insurance companies didn't require, upon confirmation of a name
> change, for women to claim their husbands as drivers of their cars
> when men do not have to insure thier wives as drivers of theirs.
I would think that this last item would be held illegal rather
easily. The others are defensible (not believable, but defensible)
with arguments like "The suits are different, and one is harder to
clean than the other" or "Alterations are included in the price of
certain garments". I don't believe these arguments, but they will
be made. The bit about insurance is simply absurd.
--David
|
14.119 | | PENUTS::JLAMOTTE | J & J's Memere | Fri Aug 11 1989 12:57 | 8 |
| We are required to identify all licensed drivers in the household
when we insure our cars...if we change our name it is assumed there
is a new member. Men do not have to go through that process (changing
their name) but at the time of renewal there is a question that they
should answer.
If in fact a man's wife were to have an accident and he did not have
her listed the insurance company could refuse to pay the claim.
|
14.120 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | I'm the NRA, GOAL, TBA | Fri Aug 11 1989 13:39 | 2 |
| Seen in the paper yesterday _ the Cadet commander, or senior
cadet, at West Point, this year, is a twenty year-old woman.
|
14.121 | not to rain on the parade but | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Black as night, Faster than a shadow... | Fri Aug 11 1989 14:22 | 6 |
| > * Woman's haircuts and men's haircuts cost the same.
I don't think that will happen until men and women get haircuts that require
a similar amount of time and skill.
The Doctah
|
14.122 | always more expensive no matter the skill | ACESMK::POIRIER | | Fri Aug 11 1989 14:49 | 10 |
| re: 121
I must disagree - women get charged much more whether the hair is
simple to cut or more difficult. My mother-in-law has hair all one
length. To have it trimmed at all one length costs her $20. At the
same hair salon her husband can have it cut (layers mind you) and blow
dried for $15. Makes a lot of sense when hers takes 5-10 minutes and
his takes 15-20.
Suzanne
|
14.123 | Tax-exempt in Rhode Island | DROSTE::bence | What's one more skein of yarn? | Fri Aug 11 1989 14:59 | 4 |
| From the Boston Globe on Wednesday, August 9th:
The state of Rhode Island has awarded tax-exempt status to the
religious organization "Our Lady of the Roses" Wiccan Coven.
|
14.124 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Sun Aug 13 1989 15:23 | 9 |
| Re: .121
My hair is all one length. I usually want 1-2 inches off the bottom,
an extremely simple cut (easier, in fact, than many men's cuts, since
men rarely have hair all of one length). If I get it cut by a stylist,
it costs as much as any woman's haircut.
In fact, I wonder how much of a difference there is in the amount of
time and skill required for women's and men's haircuts.
|
14.125 | depends on the style... | THEBAY::VASKAS | Mary Vaskas | Mon Aug 14 1989 13:23 | 7 |
| Well, the person who cut my hair last didn't spend nearly as much
time on it as she did on a teen-age boy's recently -- he had her
draw/shave a picture of a cow in his haircut. (She said it took
her an hour...)
MKV
|
14.126 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | Even in a dream, remember, ... | Mon Aug 14 1989 13:40 | 3 |
| Oh Mary, that's wonderful! I saw a bat-insignia on a wrestler; I didn't know
regular folks were doing it!
Mez
|
14.127 | Don't hold your breath | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Wed Aug 16 1989 11:56 | 10 |
| According to some Jewish traditions, men and women will be equal
in the messianic era (after the messiah comes).
I found this out while studying the marriage ceremony. The groom
places a ring on the brides finger to protect her, and the bride
goes around the groom seven (or three, depending on who you listen
to) times to protect him, and to foreshadow the time when men and
women would be equal.
--David
|
14.128 | Tht's a new twist on the Jewish wedding for me | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Aug 16 1989 12:35 | 5 |
| Wow! I never ran into that particular midrash. At least, in a Jewish
wedding, no one asks "who gives this woman...."! (Apparently it used to
be very daring to have your father answer "her mother and I do"...)
/Charlotte
|
14.129 | Changes in the trade show environment | WMOIS::B_REINKE | if you are a dreamer, come in.. | Mon Sep 11 1989 16:20 | 43 |
|
The following was sent to me as personal mail this afternoon, and
I like it so much that I asked my friend if I could enter it
in the file as an anon note.
Bonnie
=wn= comod
I went to a trade show with my wife this week-end. I made a few observations
that I thought you might be interested in.
As a male/female team we see alot that all male of all female teams may
be missing. As we left one booth my wife remarked that it didn't really
bother her when people assumed that the man was in charge (in our case it
is definitely the woman who is charge in things related to our store).
I pointed out that that was not happening as often as it had even two years
ago and she agreed. I also pointed out, what she hadn't realized, that when
we went to a booth where a woman was in charge she invariably assumed that
my wife was in charge. Turn about is fair play I guess.
At the same time once my wife started asking her questions almost everyone
picked up who was really in charge. Again this is improved over a trade
show a few years ago.
This was a general merchandise show so there was a wide variety of products
and companies. Interestingly enough a lot, perhaps most, of the companies
that were there to introduce a new product and which appeared to be startups
were either run by women or had women as major partners or executives.
Minority run outfits, especially Oriental owned, businesses were also widely
represented both as good sized established and small start up companies.
A woman business person got a tremendous amount of support from other
women at this show. I would not be surprised if a tremendous amount of
woman to woman networking was going on with people who were in town for
more than one day of the four day show. I believe that an "old girl"
network to rival the "old boy" network may appear in our lifetime.
We will be going to more of these shows in the future. I can't wait to
see if they're all like this.
|
14.130 | when we have the money -- they listen well | ASHBY::MINER | Barbara Miner HLO2-3 | Wed Sep 13 1989 20:51 | 16 |
| Last week, I attended a meeting with a sales representative, the sales
manager for the eastern region, and the president (he flew out from California
to talk with us) of a company that makes specialized analysis equipment
for electron microscopes. They invited all the people from DIGITAL in this
area who have purchased or will purchase such systems (cost $40 to 100k).
We were invited to tell them why we chose the system that we did -- and
to discuss what features we would like to see in future generations of equipment.
So there we were -- five intelligent, articulate, logical WOMEN who are
spending the money here and making the decisions. Those three male executives
listened to every word!!
Barbara
|
14.131 | | SELL3::JOHNSTON | bord failte | Mon Sep 18 1989 14:52 | 10 |
| re.13.470 'a car of her own...'
When I bought my car this past January, the salesman and dealership
were most accepting of me.
In fact, the salesman was a bit shocked that I brought Rick in to have
his name put on the title. Rick asked if he could test-drive the car
and the salesman turned to me and said, 'It's your car. Do you mind?'
Ann
|
14.132 | Anyone have more info on this? | TLE::D_CARROLL | It's time, it's time to heal... | Fri Dec 08 1989 11:56 | 8 |
| I heard a very brief clip on WBCN this morning along the lines of "A woman
professor at <someuniversity> charged the school with discrimination, and
for the first time under <Federal anti-discrimination laws?> she had her
professorship reinstated, with tenure."
I should really read the newspaper instead of listening to the radio.
D!
|
14.133 | End of a Boston Institution | BOLT::MINOW | Pere Ubu is coming soon, are you ready? | Sat Dec 16 1989 12:02 | 18 |
| The Boston Globe announced today that Filene's Basement's downtown Boston
store will soon have a dressing room for women. I.e., no more "frenzied
scenes of half-clothed women shoppers yanking dresses over their heads."
According to an agreement with MCAD (Mass. Commission Against Discrimination)
the dressing room will have to be at least equal in size to the men's dressing
room which was described as a "bullpen-type arrangement."
"Until the women's facility is built, Filene's Basement will continue to
march to its own eccentric beat.
"Yesterday, as every day, women threw on turtlenecks over their heads in
midaisle and tried on designer cocktail dresses over jeans.
"As one shopper said, while eyeing a sequened Givenchy dress, reduced from
$4,350 to $299: ''A women with no bra and a little bikini could drop
dead in the middle of the floor and no one would care.''"
|
14.134 | | FDCV29::HQERVIN | Roots & Wings... | Sun Dec 17 1989 17:20 | 20 |
| >>The Boston Globe announced today that Filene's Basement's downtown Boston
>>store will soon have a dressing room for women. I.e., no more "frenzied
>>scenes of half-clothed women shoppers yanking dresses over their heads."
Another great shopping tradition bites the dust! Wanna bet that
women will still continue to yank clothes on and off in the ailes
to ensure their snagging the best buys (at least the "real" power
shoppers will do that ! :-) )
>>According to an agreement with MCAD (Mass. Commission Against Discrimination)
>>the dressing room will have to be at least equal in size to the men's dressing
>>room which was described as a "bullpen-type arrangement."
Gee, I didn't know that there even was a men's dressing room. Seems
to me it would be far more interesting if they took away the men's
dressing room rather than adding a women's dressing room to make
things even!
Laura_who_will_be_doing_some_power_shopping_in_the_basement_this_week
|
14.135 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Mon Dec 18 1989 08:40 | 13 |
| The men's dressing room in Filene's Basement is a true piece of
work. It's a concrete-block room, painted junior high school
brown, with one bench, a half-dozen or so hooks on the wall, one
(1) mirror that seems to get cleaned on alternate Candlemas days,
and no partitions or dividers.
I trust that the distaff facilities will be equally gay.
--Mr Topaz
p.s.: Anyone who thinks that a suburban F.B. is the same, or even
remotely similar, to the Boston F.B. has probably ordered fajitas
on their last dining out experience.
|
14.136 | | SONATA::ERVIN | Roots & Wings... | Mon Dec 18 1989 17:06 | 7 |
| I went to one of those suburban Filene's Basement stores this past week
and I nearly had a stroke. I wasn't sure what store I was in, but it
certainly wasn't the F.B. at downtown crossing and I think they have
their *nerve* calling those suburban jobs Filene's basement!
Laura
|
14.137 | | ROLL::GASSAWAY | Insert clever personal name here | Wed Dec 20 1989 16:10 | 9 |
|
I guess this goes here....
Last night, my buddy Andy was looking at a magazine of mine. It was addressed
to "Miss Lisa Gassaway"
To which he replied, "Miss?? Blech. Why don't they just use Ms.?"
Lisa
|
14.138 | Gentlemen prefer ladies who have preferences | TLE::D_CARROLL | Who am I to disagree? | Tue Dec 26 1989 11:52 | 12 |
| Myabe someone has alredy entered this (haven't read all the notes) but I
don't watch TV much so I am out of such things...
Watching commercial TV last night for the first time in, a year or so,
there was an ad for Hanes panty hose, a follow-up to the old "Gentlemen
prefer Hanes" ad string. A woman watching a TV show about fashion while
getting dressed. She is dressing in a short skirt and hose while the guy
on the TV is rambling on about how short skirts are horrible and totally
"out" this year...and then the voice over..."No matter what the gentlemen
prefer...the lady prefers Hanes." :-)
D!
|
14.139 | Sauce for the goose? | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Dec 26 1989 13:28 | 5 |
| D!, I guess you also missed the Fruit of the Loom ad, which has various
women ogling well-built men who are putting on or taking off their
underwear. I began to wonder if this was a step forwards or backwards...
Steve
|
14.140 | Signs of the times | DEVIL::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Tue Dec 26 1989 16:40 | 5 |
| While taking a different route in to work the other day I saw a
carpentry company van emblazoned "Michaelson and Daughter".
When filling out a magazine subscription for Systems Integration I
noticed there were only two titles to choose from: Ms. and Mr.
|
14.141 | Too late for me :-) | CADSE::FOX | D. Nyhan: "Men don't want to know." | Wed Dec 27 1989 08:36 | 5 |
| The 1989 IRS 1040 *finally* has official space for "Your last name"
_and_ "Spouse's last name".
Bobbi_who'll_probably_never_file_another_joint_return
|
14.142 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | Mail SPMFG1::CHARBONND | Fri Dec 29 1989 12:31 | 6 |
| The year-end double issue of 'US News and World Report' had an
excellent ad from Planned Parenthood titled "What Every Man
Should Know About Abortion."
Also a good article about companies finding new ways to deal
with working mothers, parental leave, etc.
|
14.143 | | ROLL::GASSAWAY | Insert clever personal name here | Thu Jan 04 1990 12:09 | 11 |
|
Not sure whether this belonged in the Sexism Alive topic or not, because it's
kind of reverse sexism, although I get the impression it's pretty sarcastic....
The Robert Palmer reply in the Sexism note brought this to mind.
There's a video by Michelle Shocked that has her singing with mannequin style
men in the background. It's supposed to be a spoof of the RP videos.
I thought it was pretty funny.
Lisa
|
14.144 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri Jan 05 1990 19:32 | 1 |
| It was particularly funny when they played the two back to back....
|
14.145 | In the news | JURAN::TEASDALE | | Thu Jan 25 1990 09:03 | 9 |
| From the never-underestimate-the-power-of-a-woman dept.:
Benazir Bhutto, Prime Minister of Pakistan, gave birth to a daughter
today--perhaps the first head of state [in the 20th century] to do so.
Of course, she's appointed someone to lead the country temporarily.
Even PM's get maternity leave!
Kudos to NPR for thinking this news important enough to report.
|
14.146 | perhaps? | BANZAI::FISHER | Pat Pending | Thu Jan 25 1990 09:14 | 5 |
| RE: "perhaps the first head of state [in the 20th century] to do so."
What about Queen Elizabeth?
ed
|
14.147 | nit duly picked, captain! | 2EASY::CONLIFFE | Cthulhu Barata Nikto | Thu Jan 25 1990 09:16 | 5 |
| The NPR report stated that Ms Bhutto (or however it is spelled) was the
first _elected_ head-of-state to give birth while in office. Royalty
doesn't get elected.
Nigel
|
14.148 | | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Thu Jan 25 1990 11:20 | 8 |
| Also from the NPR report:
An opposition spokesman (complained) that she would be leaving the
country leaderless until she is able to take up her duties again.
She has appointed her mother to run the country in the mean time.
-Neil
|
14.149 | Should have known better... | JURAN::TEASDALE | | Thu Jan 25 1990 12:40 | 10 |
| re: 146,147
Why didn't I think of that?
re:148
Maybe this should be in the other note...My own sexism at work: I
half-listened to who she appointed and *assumed* it was a man. OOOOOOh
that hurts.
Nancy_in_dire_need_of_an_attitude_adjustment
|
14.150 | | AISVAX::SAISI | | Fri Jan 26 1990 10:12 | 13 |
| There was a piece on NPR this morning about a local group called
"Real Men", that has organized to fight violence against women.
One of their leaders, Jackson Katz (sp?) was talking about a march
planned for this Sunday. They are raising money for the Coalition
of Shelters for Battered Women. He said that the Stuart case was
about a man murdering his wife, that four women are killed every
day by their male partners-a statistic too high to be due to random
lunatics (I didn't catch the geographical area this stat covered).
They are walking on Sunday because the Super Bowl is a celebration
of male agression within acceptable bounderies, and they would like
men to take time out and think about domestic violence which is
unacceptable and crosses the boundaries. It really made my day!
Linda
|
14.153 | Matelettes? | ENGINE::FRASER | A.N.D.Y.-Yet Another Dyslexic Noter | Tue Feb 06 1990 09:15 | 16 |
|
<><><><><><><><> T h e V O G O N N e w s S e r v i c e <><><><><><><><>
Edition : 1997 Tuesday 6-Feb-1990 Circulation : 7839
Women are to be allowed to serve on Royal Navy warships effectively
ending a ban on women in combat roles. The move was announced in the
Commons by Armed Forces Minister Archie Hamilton, at the end of a
six-hour debate on the Royal Navy. He told the House: "Our aim is for
the first of them to be embarked by the end of the year." It ends
months of argument within the Navy, the Ministry of Defence and the
Women's Royal Navy Service.
{News courtesy of the BBC}
<><><><><><><><> VNS Edition : 1997 Tuesday 6-Feb-1990 <><><><><><><><>
|
14.154 | Well, it's a start, anyways :-) | MAY20::MINOW | Gregor Samsa, please wake up | Thu Feb 08 1990 12:46 | 3 |
| Swimsuit Magazine just published its annual sports issue.
Martin.
|
14.155 | dunnno if this is hope or hype | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Thu Feb 15 1990 16:39 | 7 |
| re: .152
Old-rules girls' basketball is, according to Sports Illustrated, the
biggest winter high-school sport in Iowa -- outdraws boys' BB in all
but the biggest schools.
--bonnie
|
14.157 | Speak for yourself, mike z. | BANZAI::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Fri Feb 16 1990 14:08 | 5 |
| re:.156 I discussed Iowa's 3-on-3 basketball style with some Iowans when I
was there last year. I didn't think the excitement expressed was the
result of any perversion.
ed
|
14.159 | | CSC32::M_VALENZA | Box o' Nabiscos | Fri Feb 16 1990 14:32 | 8 |
| Also, although I have never seen old-rules girls basketball games, from
what I have heard of the rules I would wonder if there is all that much
"running around", since the players are supposed to stay in specific
zones on the court. Perhaps the Iowa games are not played by the rules
I am thinking of, though. If they are, I am surprised to hear that
anyone plays by those rules anymore.
-- Mike
|
14.160 | Since you asked. | QUICKR::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Fri Feb 16 1990 15:05 | 19 |
| The essentials of the rules: 3 defensive players and 3 offensive
players per team. Respective players play their own half of the
court and never cross.
The 'good' part of this style is that a school with a very small
number of females can field a team because they need do very little
substitution -- the players rest nearly half the game while on the
court. Also the end of the court with the ball tends to be more active
than in the full court game where there is a lot more passing and
stalling.
The 'bad' part is that women who go on to college and want to play
by the "real" rules have to learn the other half of the game.
Two states, Iowa and Oklahoma play by those rules. There is a subset
of Iowa schools, mostly the bigger ones, which play by modern rules.
I do not know if any OK schools play by the modern rules.
ed
|
14.161 | More trivia | LOWLIF::HUXTABLE | Who enters the dance must dance. | Fri Feb 16 1990 16:21 | 10 |
| At least in eastern Kansas and Missouri, both women's
basketball and volleyball seem to pull in crowds nearly the
size of the men's games. This was true of volleyball in my
high school, and is true of women's basketball at the
University of Kansas. When Lynette Woodard was playing
basketball at KU (she graduated in the early 80's, I think,
and was recruited by the Harlem Globetrotters) a *lot* of
people went to the women's games.
-- Linda
|
14.162 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Feb 16 1990 17:25 | 13 |
| I have been very pleased to see that the Nashua (NH) Telegraph covers
local girls' sports with the same enthusiasm, sometimes even more, than
they do for boys' sports. The girls high school basketball games usually
get the lead story in the sports section, with a large picture of the game.
I've also seen good coverage of girls' track and field events, including
a picture of a female shot putter (something I had not known was typically
done in competition).
It may be partly because the Nashua High School girls' basketball team is
so good, winning national championships, but the paper does seem to be
eager to present girls' sports as being equally important as boys' sports.
Steve
|
14.163 | | SX4GTO::HOLT | Robert Holt ISV Atelier West | Mon Feb 19 1990 18:24 | 2 |
|
Zarlenga, take a big bite of this bar of soap...
|
14.164 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Tue Feb 20 1990 10:20 | 4 |
| While in the San Jose airport earlier this month, the Men's room is
equipped with a baby changing area!
Eric
|
14.165 | highway rest areas, too | NOVA::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Tue Feb 20 1990 10:40 | 10 |
| There were some highway rest areas that I stopped in last month
that had baby changing tables also. I think it was in Virginia
on rte I-81 but I'm not sure. They were the type that fold up
into the wall.
One of them was in a really awkward spot as it effectively blocked
access to the urinals. It was really put in by an unthinking clod.
But as the base note's title says, "There's hope yet."
ed
|
14.166 | | RUBY::BOYAJIAN | Secretary of the Stratosphere | Sat Mar 03 1990 10:53 | 7 |
| re: last couple
There are definitely some in the highway rest areas along I-80 in
Pennsylvania. I kept meaning to mention them here (I first noticed
them circa Thanksgiving) but kept forgetting.
--- jerry
|
14.167 | | BOLT::MINOW | Gregor Samsa, please wake up | Sat Mar 03 1990 11:15 | 8 |
| I'm pretty sure I saw some in Boston's Logan airport recently -- directly
accessable to the halls, and thus not in either restroom. Imagine, a
"unisex" baby changing facility!
Also saw them in the men's room in the Modern Museum in Stockholm about
10-15 years ago.
Martin.
|
14.168 | WE'VE COME A LONG WAY | CASEE::MCDONALD | | Wed Mar 07 1990 09:00 | 4 |
| I used to play 6 woman basketball on my highschool team. I think the
game was designed back when people didn't think women were capable
of the exertion required for 5 man basketball.
AND NOW WOMEN RUN MARATHONS !! YAY!
|
14.169 | 8-) | SA1794::CHARBONND | Mail SPWACY::CHARBONND | Wed Mar 07 1990 09:15 | 6 |
| re .168 Women play 5-*man* basketball too. At least, one did.
A couple years ago the Springfield Fame minor-league team
had a woman member. (Do they call it '4-man and a woman'
B-ball now ?)
Dana
|
14.170 | | BOLT::MINOW | Gregor Samsa, please wake up | Fri Mar 09 1990 12:02 | 11 |
| AND NOW WOMEN RUN MARATHONS!
They did 20 years ago. A friend of mine won Boston 3 years in a row, and
has the permanent "best woman's time before women were officially invited"
(and wore F1 for the first official maraton in 1972 or 3 or so).
She just got back from competing in the world ski orienteering championships.
(This is more an indication that only 4 women in America were interested
in being on the team than the abilities of a 50+ year old grandmother.)
Martin.
|
14.171 | I hesitated between notes 13 and 14... | SHIRE::BIZE | La femme est l'avenir de l'homme | Tue Mar 13 1990 09:56 | 48 |
|
"La Suisse" Tuesday, March 13th, 1990 - page 27 - Regional news
I have entered the original article, the English translation is just below.
Accept my apologies for the lack of accents normally required in French, as
well as for the lousy translation... I just hate translating!
APPENZELL: VOTE DES FEMMES - C'EST BIEN PARTI
APPENZELL (ATS) - Les Appenzellois des Rhodes-Interieures seront les derniers
Suisses a se prononcer sur l'introduction du suffrage cantonal feminin lors
de leur prochaine Landsgemeinde du 29 avril.
Hier, le Grand Conseil du demi-canton a approuve sans discussion en deuxieme
lecture le projet, dont il recommande l'acceptation a l'assemblee populaire.
Appenzell Rhodes-Exterieures avait approuve le droit de vote pour ses femmes
l'annee derniere. Le vote des femmes est pour la cinquieme fois soumis a la
Landsgemeinde dans les Rhodes-Interieures, sous la pression d'une plainte de
de droit constitutionnel deposee par une citoyenne du demi-canton au Tribunal
federal.
Before the translation, a little background: Switzerland is a confederation of
22 states, called "cantons", two cantons are divided in "half-cantons", brin-
ging the total to 24 cantons. Women already have the vote on federal matters,
but each canton being sovereign in cantonal affairs, one last half-canton still
denies the cantonal vote to women. The Landsgemeinde is a voting assembly were
voting is done by counting the hands helpd up. One of the reasons given for
denying women the right to vote is that it would be the death of this custom,
as there would be too many people to hold them all together in the village's
center square...
APPENZELL: WOMEN'S VOTE - ON IT'S WAY
APPENZELL (ATS) - The Appenzellians from Rhodes-Int. (half-canton) will be the
last Swiss to give their opinion on the introduction of the women's vote at
cantonal level during the next Landsgemeinde held on April 29th.
Yesterday, the High Council of the half-canton has approved without discussion
the second reading of the project, which it recommends the popular assembly to
accept. Appenzell Rhodes-Ext (the other half-canton) had approved the women's
right to vote last year. The women's vote is submitted for the fifth time to
the Landsgemeinde, under the pressure of a complaint on constitutional grounds
made by a female citizen af that canton to the Federal Court.
|
14.172 | | JURAN::TEASDALE | | Tue Mar 13 1990 14:13 | 5 |
| And to think Switzerland is a "civilized" country. I had heard that
women didn't have the vote, but I didn't know about the national/local
division of voting. Please keep us posted.
Nancy
|
14.173 | more to come, I hope | WMOIS::M_KOWALEWICZ | Iris Anna, welcome to your life. | Fri Mar 16 1990 16:04 | 14 |
|
All this week I have been pleasantly surprised.
- Worcester Sunday paper sports section front page.
Almost 1/2 page picture of girls Bball. 1/2 remaining space write ups
of two girls playoff games.
- Boston weekday paper sports section front page.
Large pictures of H.S. girls sports and 2-3 pges of print inside.
It is good to see local girls teams getting coverage even ahead
of the Pro men's teams. yaaay
KBear
|
14.174 | Good example | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Mon Mar 19 1990 12:25 | 16 |
| Extracted from a memo a received earlier this month:
For tracking actual deployment <group> personnel will be allowed
to designate up to three focus areas including any combination
of Applications and Technologies.
Examples:
Primary Secondary I Secondary II
J. Chan NET MIS -
M. Smith VMS CLU FT
A base level knowledge of ...
Ann B.
|
14.175 | Two Small Steps... | HENRYY::HASLAM_BA | Creativity Unlimited | Mon Mar 19 1990 13:30 | 17 |
| Yesterday at Lionel Playworld (The other half of Toys 'R Us), I
found a coloring book about a little boy visiting the corporate
office of......his mother. She was an executive with a male
"assistant" (i.e. secretary). It was a pleasure to glance through!
Also, there is currently a one woman play running in Salt Lake called
"Mother Wove the Morning" that orignally was scheduled for a three
week run. It is a play by a woman about women and for women that
is back for the third straight month to sell-out crowds every night.
It has been considered so controversial that there was a bit of
picketing by some males warning women entering that it goes against
"Biblical teachings." Having seen the play, been inspired by
it and recommended it highly to others, I think it's long overdue
in Utah's patriarcal society. We may just be emerging from the
dark ages!:)
Barb
|
14.176 | Density > H2O, for sure | TLE::D_CARROLL | Sisters are doin' it for themselves | Mon Mar 19 1990 13:44 | 5 |
| re: .17 (Ann Broomhead)
Er...I don't get it...what is it an example of?
D!
|
14.177 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | if you are a dreamer, come in.. | Mon Mar 19 1990 13:55 | 6 |
| D!
notice that the first name used for the example is not anglosaxon
or even european
B
|
14.178 | Twofer | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Mon Mar 19 1990 16:31 | 4 |
| And that you don't know the first name of the first name (as
it were), which might indicate gender.
Ann B.
|
14.179 | Two good folk | BOLT::MINOW | Gregor Samsa, please wake up | Mon Mar 19 1990 19:39 | 9 |
| You might have read a full-page article in the Globe recently about the
new assistant general manager of the Boston Red Sox, a black woman.
What you might not have heard (because it wasn't publicized) is that
the general counsel of the Boston Garden and the Boston Bruins is
also a black woman (she's had the job for a bit over a year, now).
(She runs with the Boston Hash House Harriers.)
Martin.
|
14.180 | | HANNAH::MODICA | | Thu Mar 29 1990 11:34 | 7 |
|
Yesterday my wife took our sheepdog to the vets for his yearly
checkup. The regular vet was on vacation and a woman vet was
filling in. It dawned on me that I'd never seen or heard of
a woman vet before.
Hank
|
14.181 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | lately I get a faraway feelin | Thu Mar 29 1990 11:45 | 13 |
| Re .180, my current vet is a woman, and all three of her assistants
are young women. She's great and her prices are very reasonable,
too. I found her just by coincidence, too. When I made the
appointment I didn't even realize she was a woman. Her animal clinic
had been recommended to me as being good, with reasonable prices,
with no mention of her being a woman. Maybe that's a good sign,
too.
So, my cats are ahead of me! I still go to a male dentist and a
male doctor.
Lorna
|
14.182 | | JUPTR::CRITZ | Who'll win the TdF in 1990? | Thu Mar 29 1990 12:49 | 6 |
| Every so often, I see Dr. Anita <mumble>, DVM, on PBS.
She usually does a show on dogs and cats. Saw the last
one about 2 weeks ago. She was checking out a a litter
of frisky Dalmatians.
Scott
|
14.183 | | WFOV12::APODACA | Little Black Duck | Thu Mar 29 1990 15:09 | 12 |
| Re. Hank
I've seen a few (if not literal dozens). About 1/3 of the vets
I've been to are women. I'm surprised you've never run into one
before. Maybe get out to veterinary clinics more often?? ;)
Actually, -.2 back made me think "Now there's a profession I've
not seen too many women in!" Women dentists. all the women I've
seen in dental offices were hygenists, assistants, receptionists,
or patients. Hmmmm!
---kim
|
14.185 | Equal time in the Chamber of Horrors (: >,) | STAR::RDAVIS | The Man Without Quantities | Thu Mar 29 1990 15:17 | 7 |
| My last three dentists have all been women, so it might not be that
unusual.
They were all fairly young, though - probably why they got stuck with
the evening and weekend hours.
Ray
|
14.186 | But I must admit Emily is the only one I know... | WAYLAY::GORDON | Potentially house poor... | Thu Mar 29 1990 21:02 | 4 |
| In college, I had a small crush on the older sister of a friend of
mine - Dr Emily, DDS ;-)
--D
|
14.187 | | LEZAH::QUIRIY | Christine | Thu Mar 29 1990 23:53 | 8 |
|
Yeah, it doesn't seem that unusual to me, either; I always wanted to
be a vet when I was a kid. (How did I end up here?!) When I brought
an injured crow to Tuft's Veterinary school wildlife clinic, the
supervising vet was a woman and the senior student assigned to the
crow was an attractive young woman named Angela.
CQ
|
14.188 | female vet | WMOIS::B_REINKE | if you are a dreamer, come in.. | Fri Mar 30 1990 00:22 | 19 |
| Christine
I always wanted to be a vet also..
when I finished my degree in Bio from Mt Holyoke I was told that
my chances of getting into vet school ranged from 0 to none given
the difficulty of getting accepted as a woman at any vet school in the
late 60s.
So I got an MA in zoology instead and then later moved to a farm
where I learned how to 'vet' my own livestock because there are
so few vets left in Mass who do large animal practice..
(every tried to take a pony for an office visit? or imagine the looks
you get when you tuck your goat in the car for a run to the vet's
office?)
Bonnie
|
14.189 | a tangent | TINCUP::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Fri Mar 30 1990 13:19 | 10 |
|
< (every tried to take a pony for an office visit? or imagine the looks
< you get when you tuck your goat in the car for a run to the vet's
< office?)
Well Bonnie, it's not unusual in Colorado. In fact my vet was just
telling me last weekend about a horse at their clinic that got away and
ran down Academy Blvd, one of the busiest streets in Colorado Springs!
Large animal vets usually make house calls though. :*) liesl
|
14.190 | | SYSENG::BITTLE | good girls make good wives | Tue Apr 10 1990 01:50 | 51 |
| re: 13.638 (D! Carroll)
> At first I was pleased that they showed a lot of women riding
> the bikes, [...] But the voice-over! Arrrg! They started in
> with: "The safe driver is always alert; *he* (strong emphasis
> on "he")
D!'s story about the woman bike rider being referred to as the
generic "he" by the voice-over reminded me of a similar situation
I was in a while ago which ended a much more positive manner,
thanks to another =wn=er that happened to be in the right place
at the right time. [warning, this might get long-winded ;-]
At the Low End Systems Expo '90, I was part of a demonstration
involving 3 people (all women) executing the demo and 1 person (a
man) describing what we were doing. I had never met the man in
charge of the demo, and had only been formally introduced to the
other 2 women before that day. A series of lectures from
Motorola execs had just finished, and the audience was exiting
the Doriot auditorium, which fed into the demo area.
Well who wandered over to my demo area but Martin Minow and an
architect that I'd worked with during my first 1.5 years at
Digital. We proceeded with the demo. The man describing my
actions was saying something like, "when the user of system xyz
does this, he then will show that..." Of course, this caused my
ear lobes to turn upside-down :-].
Martin, astutely recognizing what was happening, quickly
interjected something like, "Nancy will kick your knee in if you
refer to her as a he." The engineer that I'd worked with
previously agreed with Martin's assessment of the situation.
[He and I lunched together frequently, and was very aware of my
feminist philosophies thanks to a different engineer I worked
with who frequently made statements like, "I think of women as
mostly sex objects," and "I hope [wife's name] has made a good
dinner tonight.", etc.]
How two seemingly random people from a group exiting an
auditorium observing a demo would know how I feel about being
referred to as a "he" seemed to surprise the man describing the
demo. He gave me a strange look (I could hardly contain myself
;-), corrected himself, and proceeded.
Later, we had a 1 on 1 discussion about it, and truly positive
communication occurred as a result. Anyway, I think Martin and
another engineer first commenting on it made it _a lot_ easier
for me to gently broach the subject with someone I didn't know.
nancy b.
|
14.191 | | BOLT::MINOW | Gregor Samsa, please wake up | Tue Apr 10 1990 18:58 | 13 |
| Not specifically a woman thing, but the upcoming Boston Marathon is
showing wheelchair athletes in a prominent role:
-- Ricoh has a full-page color ad in the official program and the current
months issue of New England Runner showing two wheelchair athletes
speeding neck and neck.
-- The press kit has biographies of lead men and women wheelchair athletes.
-- The press jacket shows a wheelchair leading the field (which is what
happens in the race itself).
Martin.
|
14.192 | On the Technical Front... | FRICK::HUTCHINS | Wheeere's that Smith Corona? | Thu Apr 12 1990 12:30 | 6 |
| NETMAN:: has been replaced with...
NETLDY::
|
14.193 | | JARETH::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Thu Apr 12 1990 22:10 | 17 |
| VMS Engineering was just reorganized. A friend asked me if my new
supervisor were male or female. I chided them about how that shouldn't
be important information, but they wanted to know because they were
expecting a supervisor probably to be male. As it happens, my
supervisor is female.
When I got back to my office, I checked the organization chart. I had
previously separated three pages from the rest (this thing is big), the
three pages that illustrated that path from me to the top of VMS, and I
had pinned those pages on a wall and examined the path from me up,
including the names of the various divisions and the managers.
But I hadn't noticed that my supervisor, group manager, and cost center
manager were all female. It just wasn't important/distinctive.
-- edp
|
14.194 | | LYRIC::BOBBITT | festina lente - hasten slowly | Fri Apr 13 1990 09:44 | 4 |
| Mine too. Isn't it neat? I do think it's distinctive. And cool. So
many role models! So many mentors!
-Jody
|
14.195 | | ICESK8::GOLDMAN | aka LDYBUG::GOLDMAN | Sat Apr 14 1990 12:18 | 17 |
| I'm not sure if this quite belongs in this note, but I know
I've seen discussions about this, and I thought it was
interesting.
On the copyright page in one of the books that I'm using for a
research paper, I noticed the following paragraph:
"All references in this book to personnel of male gender are
used for convenience only and shall be regarded as including both
males and females."
(The book has a copyright date of 1987). Now maybe I just haven't
been paying attention, but that's the first time I'd ever seen that
explicity documented.
amy
|
14.196 | | CSSE32::M_DAVIS | Marge Davis Hallyburton | Sat Apr 14 1990 18:11 | 4 |
| Amy, it sounds to me like that was a shortcut.
mdh
|
14.197 | Doesn't impress me at all... | EGYPT::SMITH | Passionate committment/reasoned faith | Tue Apr 17 1990 11:37 | 10 |
| Amy,
I've seen that kind of thing before and consider it a copout. If
people choose to retain the traditional male pronouns, I can live with
that easier than having them say something to the effect that, "I
*know* better, but, frankly, it's too much bother to write
differently!" Better that they keep quiet and do what they want!
A writer myself,
Nancy
|
14.198 | | BOLT::MINOW | Gregor Samsa, please wake up | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:30 | 7 |
| Similar text was in a U.S. Army training manual published in 1981.
A recent U.S. Officer's Training manual showed a wide mixture of
gender and ethnicity among both officers and enlisted personnel.
Martin.
|