[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vmszoo::rc

Title:Welcome To The Radio Control Conference
Notice:dir's in 11, who's who in 4, sales in 6, auctions 19
Moderator:VMSSG::FRIEDRICHS
Created:Tue Jan 13 1987
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1706
Total number of notes:27193

1035.0. "Thunder Tiger Trainer Comments Please....." by GRANPA::VCARUSO (VINNIE'S GONE FISHIN) Wed Jun 21 1989 12:51

    I have finally chosen a trainer after all the reading ( here, and
    magazines).  Thunder Tiger's Trainer 40.  The trainer was not
    mentioned here in this conferenceto my knowledge, but maybe some 
    folks out there have some experience with this particular plane.
    Comments on construction, trimming, engines, and so on would be
    appreciated from all.  By the way for anyone who is not familiar
    with the Thunder Tiger Trainer 40, it closely resembles the PT40
    from great planes.  The wingspan is a tad greater than the PT. 
    Wingspan is 68 inche, and the plane is rated for a 35-45 motor.
    Good or bad comments, whatever you might have to say about it are
    surely welcome.
    
    Vinnie Caruso
    DWO
    
    P.S.  I have read ALL the notes on getting an instructor, and wouldnt
    dare settle for anything less than a top shelf coach.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1035.1Thunder TigerKYOA::GAROZZOWed Jun 21 1989 16:027
    	A member of my club has one with a K&B 40 in it. Flies well for an
    ARF.  Limited capability for aerobatics or inverted flight but fine for
    getting started. I thought it a bit overpriced however. I believe you
    get it from HOBBY SHACK. 
    
    Regards,
    Bob G.  KYO 
1035.2welcomeORIENT::JONEILLThu Jun 22 1989 07:337
    sounds like a good choice to me. You'll appreciate the big wing too.
    Instructors tend to have you fly about three mistakes high and a big
    plane is easier to see. One suggestion I'd like to make is to go to the
    top of the engine range, even if you don' need it, it's nice to have
    that power in reserve. Good luck and keep us up to date.
    
                                         Jim
1035.3puddin' it togedder.MAMTS1::VCARUSOVINNIE'S GONE FISHINWed Jul 05 1989 12:3913
    For anyone following this note, or anyone interested parties out
    there.....  The T. Tiger is going together real easily except for
    the diehedral joints on the wing.  Overall it seems like a good
    arf, but then what do I know about arfs.  Any rate, I purchased
    an OS 46sf to power the trainer, and a futaba 4 channel "attack"
    system to talk to it.  I am real slow in getting it ready, like
    to fuss around and make sure things are perfect, but should be ready
    by the end of this week.  If anyone is interested, reply here and
    I will leave a make it or break (crash) it report.  Heres mud in
    the sky!
    
    Vinnie C.
    
1035.4Final Report On TT Trainer.MAMTS1::VCARUSOVINNIE'S GONE FISHINMon Jul 31 1989 18:2228
    Well....just in case anyone has followed this note.....
    
    The ARF kit went together fairly easily.  A few flaws however. 
    During initial taxi runs, we found out that the 11/6 prop was cutting
    grass faster than a weed wacker.  Not because of a big prop, but
    small wheels supplied for the landing gear.  I will be switching
    to 3" wheels this week.  I also replaced the supplied hinges with
    the Sig easy hinges, and used a flexible cable for throttle instead
    of the pushrod.  The plane is very tail heavy, needs lotsa weight
    as far up front as possible.  Keep this in mind should you put one
    together.
    
    Performance with a OS 46SF is really good.  Plane takes off itself
    @ 3/4 throttle, and really screams for a trainer a full.  Just like
    all "good trainers" she hold her own, comes in real slow, and is
    predictable.  After 7th flight (career total) I can make low speed 
    approaches to the runway, and make the plane do what I want it to
    do, not the reverse. I am sure that my fantastic instructor had
    a lot to do with this also.
    
    So, if anyone has read this far along, I speak highly of this plane
    for anyone like myself starting out, and cant spend a month learning
    how to build, and cover.  On a scale of 1-10, I would give it a
    8.5.
    
    
    Vinnie C.