[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vmszoo::rc

Title:Welcome To The Radio Control Conference
Notice:dir's in 11, who's who in 4, sales in 6, auctions 19
Moderator:VMSSG::FRIEDRICHS
Created:Tue Jan 13 1987
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1706
Total number of notes:27193

852.0. "Build your own RAM SIMPLE CYCLER?????" by CSC32::M_ANTRY () Mon Jan 23 1989 21:30

    I would like to see if any of our noters who are also semi electronic
    wizards could help on this one.  I would like to see someone come
    up with an article that would cover making your own "RAM SIMPLE
    CYCLER".
    
    I think that this would make a great little project that is almost
    the next best thing to a DIGIPACE type cycler.  
    
    Hows about it guys.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
852.1see 126.82GUSHER::RYDERTue Jan 24 1989 05:572
    I put in a temporary answer under the cycler topic, Note 126.
852.2cyclerNEXUS::PAGEWed Jan 25 1989 09:553
    
    	Come on Mark, cut loose w/ some of the big Software bucks and
    buy a digipace!!
852.3Here's one solutionLEDS::WATTThu Jan 26 1989 08:4921
    I have done all of this but I don't believe in simple.  I know there
    is a market for the low end basic cycler but I went for the high
    end computer controlled version.  This gives me much better info
    on what the nicads are doing.  I realize that this isn't for everyone.
    The best simple cycler would be one that discharges through a fixed
    resistor until the voltage reaches a set level. (4.4 V for reciever,
    8.8 V for transmitter)  The timer could be a regular electric clock
    controlled by a relay that trips when the battery voltage reaches
    the limit.  You set the clock to 12:00 before starting and read
    the clock after it has been stopped by the relay.  This is what
    we had in the old days before Digipace.  You could build this for
    a couple of bucks if you had an old electric clock.  By the way,
    the clock must be the old fashioned motor driven type not a digital
    one.  You need to read it after it has been shut off.  (I know it's
    obvious)  Unless you are into tinkering, it is probably better to
    shell out the bucks for a commercial unit rather than build one.
    They're lots cheaper than the cost of replacing one airplane that
    crashes due to nicad failure.  
    
    Charlie
    
852.4I GOT ONE 'A THOSE....PNO::CASEYATHE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8)Thu Jan 26 1989 10:0115
    Charlie,
    
    What you describe in .-1 is an exact description of my Flite-Life
    cycler, the first one I bought back in the early 70's.  I still
    have it but don't use it anymore as I prefer the simpler operation
    of the L.R. Taylor cycler but the unit is still quite serviceable.
    Note also that this type cycler is just that; a "cycler" only...it
    has no recharging capability so the discharged pack(s) must be
    recharged on the radio's charger(s) following discharge.   

      |
      | |      00	 Adios,      Al
    |_|_|      ( >o
      |    Z__(O_\_	(The Desert Rat)

852.5Ok....Ok....OKCSC32::M_ANTRYThu Jan 26 1989 14:585
    OK.  I am through with the abuse......I will have to shell out the
    money.
    
    Thanks alot Guys
    
852.6Taylor makes a nice TaylorGUSHER::RYDERFri Jan 27 1989 06:2311
    Mark, the solution described in Charlie's Note 852.3 is just a hair
    from the Taylor.  Use a SPDT relay; the "normally open" contact
    controls the clock, and the "normally closed" contact controls a
    simple charger.  The Taylor isn't much more; it has a push button
    switch to start the discharge, and it has two complete units in
    one box; it is a detail that it uses solid state circuitry instead
    of relays to control things.
    
    At the price Jeff is getting on the Taylor units, buying instead
    of building is a very reasonable decision, especially if you are
    not a circuitry hobbyist. 
852.7I have a schematicSNOC01::BROWNTONYTony Brown Sydney, AustraliaThu Feb 02 1989 16:5317
    For the solder enthusiasts, I have found a very simpler discharger
    circuit in an old Radio Modeller. It uses 3 transistors, 8 resistors,
    1 pushbutton switch, and 1 LED for each of transmitter, receiver,
    etc. I guess it could be adapted to drive a clock etc.  If anyone
    is interested, I will attempt to figure out to post it in this conference.

    The operation is:
    1. Connect battery and charger.
    2. Push switch to start discharge, the LED will light.
    3. When battery drops to ? v (setup at 1.1 v per cell), the LED
       goes out and the charger is connected.
    
    Simple, but should do the job.  In fact, if I get time this
    weekend.....
    
    Tony
    
852.8Here is a schematicSNOC01::BROWNTONYTony Brown Sydney, AustraliaThu Feb 02 1989 20:5676
Here is the schematic I was referring to in .8
    
    
 + ----------------------------------------------------C   E--------------- +
(battery)               |          |          |          B  TR4        (charger)
                        |          |          |          |        
                        \          \          V          |
                        /  R1      / R3       - LED      |
                        \          \          |          |
                        /          /          |          |
                        |          |          E          \
                        ---\/\/-------------B   TR2      / R8
                        |    R4               C          \
                        \                     |          /
                        /  R2                 |          |
                        \                     |          |
                        |                     |*         C
              ----------------\/\/------------)--------B  TR3
              |         |       R5            |          E
              |         |                     \          |
              |         |                     / R6       |
              |         |                     \          |
              |         |                     /          |
              /         C                     |          |
             / SW    TR1  B--------------------          |
            /           E                     |          |
              |         |                     \          |
              |         |                     / R7       |
              |         |                     \          |
              |         |                     /          |
              |         |                     |          |
     - --------------------------------------------------- -

Notes:
 * this point is the only crossover. ie wires cross over and are not connected

TR1   - NPN  2N3407
TR2   - PNP  BC 328
TR3   - NPN  BC 238 (not the same as TR2!!!
TR4   - PNP  BC 328 

          Tx     Rx
        -----   -----
R1      27, 1W 	27, 1W
R2      27, 1W   0        use a link for Rx  
R3      820     1.5k      1.5k is not specified in article - my calc
R4      680     680
R5      47K     22k
R6      330     150
R7       1k      1k
R8      4.7k    2.2k
Unless specified, 1/4 W should suffice
    
SW single pole, push to make

DISCLAIMER: PLEASE DON'T TRY THIS UNLESS YOU CAN DEBUG IT. AS YOU CAN SEE,
ONE RESISTOR VALUE WAS OMITTED. I WILL ONLY BE ABLE TO HELP DEBUG IF I
BUILD IT MYSELF.

OPERATION:

"Upon switch on, TR3 is turned on via R1 and R5. This in turn causes TR4 to turn
on and conduct, , thus switching the charger through to the nicad. Now, 
depressing SW causes TR3 and TR4 to turn off, disconnecting the charger. At the
same time, TR2 now turns on, causing the LED to light; it also takes the TR1 
base positive via R6, thus causing TR1 to turn on, so the current will stay in
discharge, even when the switch is released. As the nicad discharges, the
voltage across R1 drops until it can no longer hold TR2 on. The LED in TR2 acts
as a constant voltage source, and provides the circuit reference. As TR2 turns
off, so does TR1.This removes the discharge path, the current now resets into
its initial stage and begins recharging the nicad."

    
    Good luck
    Tony
      
852.9I knew it would happenCSC32::M_ANTRYFri Feb 03 1989 17:566
    Thanks Tony.  I think I will give it a try....
    
    Fire up those soldering irons!!!!!!!
    
    Mark Antry
    
852.10Did anyone build itTROPPO::LEWISDavid Lewis - TROPPO::LEWISFri Jun 09 1989 05:215
As a newcomer to the world of RC and use/abuse of Nicads, I'd be interested
in hearing if anyone has built/debugged Tony's cycler. 

David

852.11Part way thereSNOC02::BROWNTONYTony Brown @ SNO: Sydney, AustraliaTue Jun 13 1989 02:3114
    David
    
    I have built the cycler: the Rx part is working, but not the Tx.
    I modified the Tx to suit my 6 cell transmitter and obviously have
    introduced a minor bug. Once I get the customers of my hair and
    get to spend a little time at home base, I should get back to it!
    
    Call me if you want a copy of the original article.
    
    I hope sunny Brisbane is giving you more flying time than #$@&*
    Sydney has this year!
    
    Tony