T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
764.2 | Go for ailerons | SSDEVO::TAVARES | Oh yeah, life goes on... | Tue Nov 15 1988 15:02 | 22 |
| That thought occurred to me when I was building my infamous
Eaglet (soon to be resurrected). The stopper is that the plans
called for glassing in the center section; if I cut that to take
out the dihedral it would create a bit of a mess. I'd recommend
that you plan on building a new wing. Wing Mfg. by the way (they
advertise in RCM) has foam wings for most trainers, and probably
has one for the PT20.
As one who has learned to fly on 3 channels, I think if I did it
again I'd go for ailerons...the plane handles nicer, the
instructors know ailerons (its kind of rough on your confidence
when the instructor, who is there to keep you out of trouble,
can't steer your plane down the taxiway because he's used to
wiggling the left hand stick for steering, instead of the right
hand one), and you're flying like the "big kids" right off the
bat. Additionally, with ailerons you have some start at an
advanced trainer once you solo; I'm having to build another plane
to continue on my learning. Most trainers can be made to do
beginning aerobatics with enough power and ailerons.
If you want to fly 3 channel, get a glider...or wait until you're
able to fly solo.
|
764.3 | airlerons too! | MPGS::PERCUOCO | | Tue Nov 15 1988 16:24 | 11 |
| I'm for ailerons too! You can build your plane with a
little dihedral and aileron and still fly rudder if
you wish and when you feel confident, change to aileron.
Definately try for an instructor and learn airleron, you
won't have to learn twice and your flying skills will
develope alot faster. I started flying early this summer with an
instructor and I went from a slow high wing trainer to a pretty
snappy low-wing sport plane. I just takes a little patience and
some good instruction. Enjoy the sport, it really is fulfilling!!
Tom
|
764.4 | Low dihedral | CURIE::ANKER | Anker Berg-Sonne | Tue Nov 15 1988 17:44 | 20 |
| Re:< Note 764.3 by MPGS::PERCUOCO >
We finally agree on something!
Build it with ailerons and don't bother with the high
dihedral version. Just build the low dihedral, aileron wing
right away. I learned on a PT20 and found it an easy ship to
learn with.
_
/ |
| _====____/==|
|-/____________|
| | o \
O \
O
Hang in there! o_|_
|
Anker \_|_/
|
764.5 | RE LAST-4: I WHOLEHEARTEDLY AGREE!!!!!!!! | PNO::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Tue Nov 15 1988 18:19 | 6 |
|
|
| | 00 Adios, Al
|_|_| ( >o
| Z__(O_\_ (The Desert Rat)
|
764.7 | changing the dihedral | SPKALI::THOMAS | | Wed Nov 16 1988 13:41 | 23 |
|
Not to be off of the subject, I can't understand why kit manufacturers
and designers install dihedral braces when the surface will be
fiberglassed.Every wing failure I have seen, with or without dihedral
braces have hailed outway of the wings center section . I'd venture
to say app 6-10 inches from the center. The first third of a wing
is where the majority of the stress is. Not at the center joint.
If your fiberglassing the center don't worry. It's a simple matter
to change dihedral. Using a band saw cut the wing in two at the
center joint. Remove the covering. Remove the fiberglass tape by
heating with a heat gun. The epoxy will soften enough so that you
can get the fiberglass cloth off. Sand the wing to get a new dihedral
angle and then reglue,fiberglass and refinish. When removing the
fiberglass do it in a well ventalated area.
Oh yes, per the subject matter. Built it with ailerons. There is
no need to learn 3 channels and the go to 4 channels. Learn with
4 channels from the start.
Tom
|
764.8 | Don't skimp on center section | 18583::LEWIS | | Wed Nov 16 1988 17:19 | 23 |
|
>> The first third of a wing
>> is where the majority of the stress is. Not at the center joint.
Not sure I'd agree with that in general, Tom. Especially in
the case where the wing is attached to the fuse by rubber
bands. It seems to me that you have quite a lever and
the wing center is going to get the worst of it. The point
where each wing half meets the fuse side also gets stress,
but only half as much as the center point.
The narrower the fuse, the worse it is on the center section.
I can't argue whether the fiberglass is sufficient to replace
dihedral braces but I always do more than the manufacturer
recommends when it comes to beefing up the center section.
Bill
P.S. I'm convinced that building the aileron wing is the best approach.
Along with the other reasons mentioned in earlier replies,
I don't think trainers with lots of dihedral behave well
in windy conditions - something we have to live with quite a
bit here in New England.
|
764.9 | Thanks for the help . | MAMTS1::BDONAGHY | | Mon Nov 21 1988 09:28 | 16 |
| Hey Guys,
Mucho grasias !(did I spell that right)
Thanks for the input, great stuff. I have a
friend who has 15 years experence,to this date he
has had only one misfortune (a midair , clipped his wing)
[knock on wood]. He has agreed to teach me and I am going to
join his club. I am going to build the aileron wing. The fuse is
done and I am lining up the tail feathers , two or three weeks on the
wing and installing the radio and it will be ready for covering.
I am smart enough to have my friend check out everything before
I seal up the fuse.
Thanks again,
Bob D.
|