T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
519.17 | WANTED GRASSHOPPER,FOX, OR HORNET | GLIVET::DEAN | | Wed May 27 1987 10:50 | 7 |
| WANTED..... RC RACE CAR...USED
GRASSHOPPER, HORNET, OR FOX
ANYONE OUT THERE WHO WANTS TO SELL A USED CAR PLEASE LET ME KNOW
I'M IN THE MARKET FOR MY SON'S BIRTHDAY.
|
519.18 | Hey mister, how 'bout a nice car?? | AUNTB::VANDEUSEN | For the Snark WAS a Boojum, you see | Wed May 27 1987 13:47 | 13 |
|
I have a Mugen Bulldog II. It's a 4WD so it's more complicated than I want
to mess with. I was never able to get the differentials to work just right.
As a result, the main differential has a cracked/broke/? nut on it (too much
tightening I guess). The rest of the is car fine. I'd be willing to sell
it for $10 + shipping. I don't think it would be appropriate for your
son, but it should be a good deal for someone with the time and inclination
to tweak it.
Monte
(Raleigh, NC)
p.s. I think I'll stick with gliders.
|
519.19 | | SPKALI::THOMAS | | Wed May 27 1987 13:57 | 6 |
|
A friends son has a "Rockbuster" which is from World Engines
and is an exact copy of a Grasshopper that he wants to get rid of.
If you want I'll check into what he wants for it.
tom
|
519.20 | Bulldog is gone | AUNTB::VANDEUSEN | For the Snark WAS a Boojum, you see | Thu May 28 1987 09:52 | 8 |
|
re: .2
Wow, response is good. I've sold the Bulldog.
Thanks everyone.
Monte
|
519.21 | | MSEE::BREAULT | | Thu May 28 1987 16:14 | 7 |
|
An RC store has just opened in the center of Derry, N.H. and there
was a used Fox in the window.
Have you considered mailorder/new?
/Brian
|
519.22 | EXPENSIVE DUST COLLECTOR | GLIVET::DEAN | | Sat May 30 1987 06:42 | 6 |
| Yes I have looked mail order. It looks like about $156.00 complete
with car, controller, batttery, and charger from mail order. The
problem is I would hate to spend that much money on something my
son may loose interest in a month later. $156.00 dust collector.
If anyone else has a dust collector that want to get rid of let
me know.
|
519.23 | Share a car with the kids | WFOVX0::KROSTOSKI | | Tue Jun 02 1987 00:27 | 18 |
| <<< COGMK::VTX$DISK:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RC.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Welcome to the Radio Control conference >-
================================================================================
Note 179.6 WANTED GRASSHOPPER,FOX, OR HORNET 6 of 6
WFOVX0::KROSTOSKI 8 lines 1-JUN-1987 23:16
-< GO for it >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
May I suggest spending another $20.00 and get a hornet instead.
I feel it will be a better buy in the long run. As for loosing
interest I feel if you try the car after building it WITH YOUR SON
there will be no loss of interest for either of you. I have a 10
year old daughter and a 12 year old son who love their cars. Racing
the r/c cars at our local track is a great family hobby. The money
spent on our cars is well spent WITH MY CHILDREN. Get out there
with your kids and have a ball!
Dennis Krostoski
|
519.24 | Advice re.: RC cars needed | FLDSVC::LAVES | The Spider man | Wed Mar 02 1988 16:32 | 18 |
| I am looking for a little advice:
After toying with one of those $29.99 jobs for a while, I don't
feel challenged at all anymore and I am thinking of buying something
real. I found a grasshopper with radio for $98 and some other stuff
around $150. Since I am kind of limited on the funds I'd like to
go cheap.
Q's: Is it OK to go grasshopper and upgrade the car as
time goes by and skills increase or shall I spend a little more
for another car? What is another good car in that price range?
Also, how long do those battery packs last, and do the more expensive
cars (more that 29.99) run straight (play in the linkage)?
Any suggestions/recommendations are greatly appreciated.
J�rg
P.S. If you've got something that might be down my alley for sale,
send me mail. Thanks
|
519.25 | What's your ceiling for the entire system? | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | Snowstorm Canoeist | Thu Mar 03 1988 11:22 | 49 |
| The 'hopper is a decent car to learn on, but it isn't competitive
in any sense of the word. Reasons:
1) Frame - it's not as abuse-proof as most other off-road
cars. OK if you don't abuse it.
2) Front susp - is not particularly good. Can be upgraded somewhat
with aftermarket hop-up parts
3) Rear susp - there AINT ANY! The rear axle, diff, reduction
gearing, and motor all are a rigid unit, unsprung
as far as the ground is concerned. Result is that the
grasshopper behaves as it's namesake - it HOPS given
the slightest provocation. This is poor in straightaways
and Death Incarnate on a curve. This isn't fixable
even with hop-up parts.
Conclusion: You'll quickly get bored with it, and it'll end up
costing you MORE to keep the 'hopper running than it would to buy
a decent (more amenable) car (I'm counting cost of aftermarket parts
as "needed").
Recommendations: Frog (for 2WD) or Hot/Supershot for 4WD. I've had
both of these vehicles and can vouch for their durability and handling.
If anything, the frog is slightly less forgiving but slightly more
durable. (The Frog has 4 wheel independent suspension, and a very
strong rear end that is easy to maintain.) Either can be highly
competitive with some aftermarket parts.
Whatever you buy, get the ball bearings for it, from day 1. The
bushing bearings last OK in clean conditions, but they wear quickly
once exposed to dust and dirt. BB cars also run faster and longer
on a battery charge.
4WD (like xShots and Bulldogs, etc) don't always run faster; just
usually do. They also tend to get stuck less often, and handle
slightly better on the curves (less spinout tendency). The 4WDs
do have more parts and hence are slightly more delicate than the
2WD units (my Frog was once RUN OVER by a 110lb bicyclist- no damage!)
Possible plan: Get a 'hopper with the INTENT to sell it if/when
you get the urge for something more capable. Figure you will be
able to get $.40 on the dollar, maybe less. Buying used is also
a good plan.
Is the $150 a ceiling for you, or is it OVER your ceiling? Does
it include radio, servos, BEC, electronic speed control (replaces
the standard resistor/switch/servo setup) and charger?
|
519.26 | more Q's | FLDSVC::LAVES | The Spider man | Thu Mar 03 1988 15:38 | 5 |
| $150 is want I would like to spend incl a radio, servos and
charger.
What is a BEC and do I really need speed control?
???J�rg???
|
519.27 | More A's | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | Snowstorm Canoeist | Thu Mar 03 1988 17:41 | 12 |
| BEC == Battery Eliminator Circuit. A $9 gizmo that uses the propulsion
battery power to run the radio. A good idea on a car with electronic
speed control, otherwise it's big saving is in not having to hassle
with 4 AA cells.
There's an entire note on electronic versus switched-resistor speed
controls. I have burned out switched-resistor systems, but have
never had a problem with my electronic controller.
Where are you located? Maybe someone here has something used to
sell you.
|
519.28 | | SNDCSL::SMITH | William P.N. (WOOKIE::) Smith | Thu Mar 03 1988 17:49 | 7 |
| It seems that a lot of the electronic speed controllers have the
Battery Eliminator Circuitry built into them, so you may save a
few bucks there. I can't see spending $9 on what amounts to a 3
terminal regulator and a switch....
Willie
|
519.1 | Optima owner | 3D::COMINS | | Wed Apr 20 1988 14:01 | 23 |
| Aren't the Frog, Hornet, Foxes and Ultima's all 2wd cars? If the
majority of your club has 2WD would you really want a 4WD car?
I have a Turbo Optima (my only car) and am very happy with it.
I don't get much chance to race anyone so I can't tell you how
competitive it is with some of the other cars. However, my brother
in-law also has a Turbo Optima and has raced it frequently. He
only looses to one other Turbo Optima. Beware that a 4-WD car like
the Optima requires alot of maintainance to keep it running well.
I have only broken one part (front hub) by slamming into a parked
car (real smart on my part).
I have used a few Kyosho after market products such as swing shafts
and the belt drive kit. I have not put in modified motors as the
car is faster than I can really handle until my driving skill improves.
Although I have seen other notes complaining about Kyosho kit
instructions I found them to be excellent and had no trouble putting
it together.
By the way where are you located?
Todd
|
519.2 | The choice is yours... | DESENG::ORLANDO | | Wed Apr 20 1988 16:18 | 13 |
|
If you're really in for a 4wd car as mentioned in .1, I would
go instead for the Optima Mid. It's really tricked-up, from the
belt drive to the 48 pitch gears It's a sure winner in good driver
hands. It's based on the same car that conquered 5 of the ten top
places in the 1987 IFMAR world champs. To race this car against
a Frog, Hornet or Fox would be really unfair...
If you're for a 2wd car either go to the Ultima or the RC10, these
are currently the best in 2wd, the Ultima being a more recent design.
|
519.3 | vote for Optima-Mid | 3D::COMINS | | Wed Apr 20 1988 18:02 | 15 |
| If you want 4WD I totally agree with the recommendation to go to
the Optima-Mid. The chain drive in the Optima is not worth putting
in because it breaks and is ineffecient. I have replaced my chain
drive with a belt drive and would recommend that anyone building
a new Optima do the same.
However the cost of the chain drive kit is probably around $35 and
the cost delt between the Turbo Optima and the Optima-Mid is $100.
For the extra $65 you get all the benifits of the Optima-Mids improved
drive train (48 pitch gears).
I forgot about the Optima-Mid when I wrote my earlier reply.
Todd
|
519.4 | Thanks | SRFSUP::PEDONE | | Wed Apr 20 1988 20:29 | 9 |
| Thanks for the quick response. I'm located in southern California,
L.A. area. The reason I was going to the Optima line is because
it seems like every carries parts. I live 4 miles from Hobby Shack
and I wanted to be able to get parts with out waiting on mail.
I am concerned about getting too fast of a car, my driving skill
is not of the pro status yet (I wish). I also thought the 4wd might
help when running on sand. The Turbo Optima comes with some better
components. Will the oil filled shocks add better handling?
|
519.5 | Don't forget Tamiya! | NORDIC::COLBURN | | Thu Apr 21 1988 07:00 | 8 |
| You really should consider a Fox or a Falcon.Both these
cars are competitive right out of the box and Hobby shack
has the spare parts if you need them.
Good Luck
Kevin
|
519.6 | six of one..... | AISVAX::JONEILL | | Thu Apr 21 1988 07:15 | 6 |
| Maybe I'm partial because I own one but my suggestion is to go with
the rc 10. I won't look at a kyosho, seen to many break to easy.Of
course the rc10 is'nt bullet proof, Ive replaced the stock servo
saver with a hot tricks kit (the stock set up was far to weak).
Ask around, go to some races and see what everyone else runs.
Jim
|
519.7 | toss a coin... | DESENG::ORLANDO | | Thu Apr 21 1988 15:22 | 24 |
|
(re .3)
The price of the Mid-optima is $199 vs $209 for the Turbo Optima
in the latest Tower Hobbies catalog. The Mid is $10 cheaper than
the Turbo, not $100 more expensive as you say.
(re .5)
I've had an Ultima for a year now. It has never broke a part,
all I've replaced are parts worn out under normal use. I race heavily
every weekend and this car has been an RC10 killer since day one.
The only times I have lost has been due to a defective part behind
the steering wheel (ME!). However I must agree that the factory speed
control isn't worth a .... (replace it with a tekin or novak ESC).
I have raced against all sort of RC10's from stock form to highly
modified graphite-chasis versions and I must admit its the only
other car I would take a serious look at...
|
519.8 | Thunder Shot | FSTVAX::WIMMER | | Mon Apr 25 1988 14:36 | 6 |
| According to the back cover of RC Action Magazine (May) the new
Tamiya Thunder Shot 4wd buggy recently "creamed" both the Optima's
and RC10's! I just happen to own one (picked it up in Hong Kong)
and it's pretty impressive. Needs 16 bearings -- buy them before
you build it, I had to dissasemble mine 2 weeks later and put them
in.
|
519.29 | Ouch, I drove over my foot again... | FLDSVC::LAVES | The Spider man | Tue May 03 1988 13:32 | 15 |
| Well, I finally got rid of my $150! I bought a brand spanking new
Kangaroo for $99.99, that includes a Challenger 250 radio and a speed
control. $24.99 went for an AC/DC charger and $18.99 for a battery.
I know that this car is not the greatest thing since sliced
bananas, but it holds up pretty well. And if I decide to trash it,
I still have $50 radio and a $30 speed control.
But next time I want something nice, something I don't have
to disassemble first on order to put it together (the Kangaroo comes
assembled)!
BTW, Tower delivered prompt and, although the car is in the
books with two different prices, quoted me the lower price rightaway.
J�rg
|
519.9 | Surfing with the Alien | ANGORA::MCNANEY | | Tue May 03 1988 13:58 | 19 |
| After many hours with my face buried in the Tower catalogue, and
several trips to the Hobby store, I bought a Hirobo Alien 4wd Mid.
This car is comes complete with a bearing kit and the gold shocks.
This car uses a belt drive setup, with the belt under a cover that
runs the length of the body. It uses mostly plastic body parts.
The design is very clean and the instructions are legible. I race
with three other guys. Two of them have Kyosho Ultima's and one
has a Pegasus. We all have 540 motors. Athough in the top end
they had a slight edge on me, I blew them away in the corners. The
thing sticks to the ground like a tank. A couple of times the
Ultima's would try to force me out of the picture but they tended
to fly into the bushes or such, while I continued on my merry way.
Tower does not have the Alien so you would have to get it through
your local dealer, but parts come in, in about a week. I know this
because, I was too impatient to wait until I got bumpers, and I broke
the section the the swing arm pin goes through. I recommend the
Alien, if you can get it.
Jeff McNaney
|
519.10 | I like the Mid... | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Tue May 03 1988 14:06 | 27 |
| I bought a ThunderShot as my first car. I admit I really didn't
do very much research; just made an impulse buy.
I installed a LeMans 360G motor and a taller pinion gear, and a full
bearing set. The car was incredibly quick; it is a real featherweight
design. My first indoor race took home a 2nd place tropy, and me
with no skills whatsoever.
What I didn't like was the lack of caster adjustment, and the cheap
plastic shocks which break in a good impact (I know, don't do that).
Also, the front shock spring tends to bend the lower control arms.
After much frustration in getting replacement parts and finding
a good indoor suspension setup, I gave up and bought an Optima Mid.
The Mid is everything I expected the Thundershot to be. I have
very little skill in this sport, but even I can make the Mid handle
like a dream. The quality of the Kyosho parts is much better, in
my opinion. Replacement parts are reasonably easy to find. The
suspension is adjustable umpteen different ways. The car feels solid
as a rock compared to the totally plastic Thundershot.
With a Twister 702 motor and an 18 tooth pinion, the Mid screams.
However, for beginners, I'd recommend a large front bumper. The
stock bumper is the size of a stamp and offers no protection.
|
519.11 | More on ThunderShot vs Mid... | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Wed May 04 1988 20:36 | 23 |
| A few more comments on the Optima Mid vs the Tamiya Tundershot...
The Thundershot uses a shaft to transmit power to the front wheels.
This requires an extra pair of bevel gears at each differential
to transfer the power. This is a rather inefficient way to transfer
power, as compared to the Optima's simple belt drive. As a consequence
of these extra gears, the Thunderhot makes quite a racket; it sounds
like a high speed blender. The Optima is eerily quiet.
Now that I have gained quite a bit more experience on different
types of surfaces, I can assess what my problem was with the
Thundershot. The stock springs are far too stiff. The car is so
light that there is virtually no suspension movement in hard cornering,
so the car tends to radically understeer with the power on, and
radically oversteer with the power off. I believe this could
be remedied with replacement springs of much lower rate that still
maintain the stock ride height and hence wheel camber.
I may yet resurrect the Thundershot and try to get it set up properly.
With it's super lightweight design, the acceleration is truly amazing.
Ed.
|
519.12 | In Defense of shaft-drive | NORDIC::COLBURN | You want fries with that? | Thu May 05 1988 06:22 | 11 |
| Shaft drive is much more reliable than belt drive or
chain drive.Also the Thundershot's shocks are adjustable
and can be made very soft,softer still if you use lighter
oil in the shocks.The Super Shot I used to have was very
quiet running and when I needed the odd spare part I had
no problem getting it.In the races I was in last year I never
once failed to see a breakdown of a Kyosho belt or chain drive
car while shaft drive car breakdowns were almost nil.
Kevin
|
519.13 | | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Thu May 05 1988 13:16 | 22 |
| I found that the Tamiya propellor joints (these are slotted joints
that hold the drive shaft at either end) had become spread open
after abusive acceleration. This had the effect of increasing the
free slop in the gear train. I'm not sure this had any effect on
performance.
I can't comment on the Kyosho reliability, since the car is still
pretty new....
I did use light oil in the Thundershot shocks. The spring adjustment
has nothing to do with the spring rate, nor does the damping. I
believe the spring rate is far too high. The spring rate is only
a function of the wire diameter, body diameter, number of coils,
and material used. Trimming coils off of a spring makes it stiffer.
Adding coils makes it softer.
The best way to soften the spring rate is to use a smaller wire
diameter. Like I said in .11, I may still try this and give the
Tamiya another chance.
|
519.14 | belt drive seems reliable | 3D::COMINS | | Thu May 05 1988 16:51 | 10 |
| I converted my Optima from a chain drive to a belt drive. I DID
have problems with the chain drive but have never had a problem
with the belt. The belt changed the personality of my car. I runs
quieter and is more efficient. I can't think of how the belt will
fail so I'd be interested if you know of specific failure modes
for the belt drive. I've put quite a few hours on my belt and it
shows no sign of wear.
Todd
|
519.15 | losing blues | BPOV09::LAMPROS | Bill Lampros | Fri May 06 1988 18:27 | 4 |
| seems like all the cars that your friends have are 2wd. yuo might
consider buying the optima which is a very good car but go for the
new optima mid or get a 2wd like your friends.
|
519.16 | try dual shocks up front | FSTVAX::WIMMER | | Mon May 09 1988 13:20 | 11 |
| I have also had some problems with the front suspension on my
ThunderShot.The front tires toe in radically if you soften the front
shock. I just replaced the front monoshock with dual shocks and
it seems to have helped a bunch! The biggest problem seems to be
that the top suspension arm is not long enough. A friend and I
are in the process of making new ones. This only seems to be a
problem with pavement racing. When offroad, with 2-3 spacers in
the shocks, no problem.
Diane
|