T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
412.1 | DELIGHTFUL IN THE AIR; FRIGHTFUL ON THE GROUND.... | MAUDIB::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Tue Dec 22 1987 16:35 | 16 |
| Jim,
I've seen a few of the fun-scale bipes you mention. By and large
they were all flown by experienced modelers but they appeared plenty
friendly/forgiving enough for the average modeler's 2nd-or-3rd plane.
One thing though, they were frightful on the ground [asphalt runway]
but this may not be a factor operating from grass.
BTW, yer' observation that the Aeromaster is "not" a beginner's
airplane is dead on the mark. A guy should have 3-or-4 ships under
his belt and be "real" comfortable with flight-basics before trying
an Aeromaster on...not that it's particularly treacherous, understand,
it's just verrrry nimble/agile/crisp in the response department
and requires that the pilot be capable of keeping up with it.
Adios, Al
|
412.2 | BIPE 40 | DARTH::GAROZZO | | Tue Dec 22 1987 16:44 | 5 |
| I DON'T HAVE EXPERIENCE WITH IT MYSELF BUT CLUB MEMBERS TELL ME
THAT THE GREAT PLANES SUPER SPORTSTER BIPE 40 IS A GOOD FIRST BIPE
PLANE.
|
412.3 | The ACE 4-40 bipe is my recommendation | MURPHY::ANKER | Anker Berg-Sonne | Tue Dec 22 1987 17:24 | 22 |
| Re:< Note 412.0 by AKOV11::CAVANAGH "We don't need no stinkin badges!" >
Jim,
The Mark's Models bipes are not good beginner's planes
because of the very short tail moments. They are extremely
squirrely at takeoff and nose over on landing. Once they are in
the air they fly very well. I have the Fokker D7 with a Sito 45
in it and it is a beauty when it's put-put'ing around.
A bipe that I would strongly recommend is the ACE 4-40
bipe. It has a much longer tail moment and the CG is far enough
behind the gear that you don't have to worry about nosing over.
I have one that I flew all the time for several months until 3IM
got it. Mine had an O.S. 40 Surpass in it and performed
beautifully. Servo installation takes a fair amount of work.
There's not a lot of room and they recommend micro servos. I
don't - use regular size servos and fit them very carefully. The
ACE was a delight to build and fly and I may very well purchase a
new kit.
Anker
|
412.4 | Balsa USA Phaetons | SPKALI::THOMAS | | Wed Dec 23 1987 06:44 | 12 |
| Try a Balsa USA Phaeton Bipe with a .35 in it or their Phaeton
II with a 45-50 in it. I've has several of these and they fly
extremely good. They are also very reasonable priced at below 30.00
for the Phaeton and I think 37.00 for the Phaeton II. With any bipe
your going to have to learn to use your left hand. I would suggest
that you build a shoulder winged tail dragger ( sweet stick 40)
and start the spring with this. When your comfortable with takeoffs
and landings then transition to the bipe.
Tom
|
412.6 | Mig bipe? | AKOV11::CAVANAGH | We don't need no stinkin badges! | Wed Dec 23 1987 11:28 | 23 |
|
Well, I would like to get the ACE 4-40, but the price of the kit
and the engine are currently out of my range. The Phaeton (SP?)
sounds pretty good though!
What about the ACE All Star Bipe? It comes with foam wings and is
only $22. The other thing is it uses a .09 to .15 engine and I have
an OS Max .15 sitting at home waiting to be used. I suppose the 34 inch
wing span would be a consideration for me (going from a 6 1/2 foot
trainer to a <3 foot bipe could take some work).
I still have lot's of time to think about it and look around (I have
to get flying first).
BTW - The Towers cat. has a the plans for a plane called the
AVIA B534-IV by SIMCOE. This thing looks just like Al's Mig-3, but in
bipe form. It is really strange looking [no offense Al, it is just the
double wing and the large wheels on the fixed gear that makes it so
unusual]. If I take the gear and wing off and change the german insignia
to Ruskie, I'd swear it was the Mig!
Jim (Merry Xmas everyone)
|
412.7 | ALL STAR BIPE | DARTH::GAROZZO | | Wed Dec 23 1987 16:40 | 6 |
| NOTE 412.6 REFERENCES THE ACE ALLSTAR BIPE. I ALSO HAVE A .15 ENGINE
WITHOUT A HOME. DO YOU HAVE ANY MORE DETAILS? 3 OR 4 CHANNEL.
GOOD FLOATER? IS THE .15 ENOUGH POWER?
THANKS,
BOB G.
|
412.8 | Marks fun scale Pits | ARCANA::JORGENSEN | | Wed Dec 23 1987 16:44 | 21 |
|
Jim,
I bought the Marks fun scale Pits... And I would NOT recommend it for a first
bipe... better yet I would not recommend it at all!!!!!! I put an O.S. 25
max in mine, and once it was off the ground it was "all right" but once
in flight, ANY rudder deflection put the bird into a violent spin. I think
the SE 5 and the Folker are better, but the basic design is the same. I've
built and flown quite a number of ships, and the fun scale is the first that
I truly didn't enjoy flying. They have a very short tail moment, that results
in some very "snappy" response to control movement. Al is correct(again), the
things are a real fight on the ground. RCM published an article about a year
ago on the SE 5 and the Folker... if I can find them I'll let you know the
issue. If I recall, they got pretty good reviews!?
Although I have no personal experience with the sporster bipe, I've heard it's
a nice ship.
Best of luck,
Brian
|
412.9 | Midwest - Das Bipe Stick... | K::FISHER | Battery, Mags, & Gas Off! | Mon Dec 28 1987 09:56 | 23 |
| > Are there any biplanes that are friendly enough to be considered for
>the beginners 2nd plane? It would appear that the Aeromaster is not
I recommend the Midwest Models "Das Bipe Stick". It builds easy.
Flys easy and you are a little hard on it - it can take it.
I've cartwheeled mine in grass 3 times. No damage.
I've ground looped on tar maybe 20 times. Scraping up the lower wing tips
each time and loosing some Monokote.
I've stalled during landings 4 or 5 times only bending the aluminum
landing gear - except one time when I sheared the nylon gear bolts off.
In short - it takes a licking and keeps on ticking. It is now over a year old
and I'll be pulling the radio again till next spring.
Whatta plane. I never take the wings off. My only complaints are about
the (*&^%&$ing Saito .45 that I have in it.
_!_
Bye ----O----
Kay R. Fisher / \
================================================================================
|