[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vmszoo::rc

Title:Welcome To The Radio Control Conference
Notice:dir's in 11, who's who in 4, sales in 6, auctions 19
Moderator:VMSSG::FRIEDRICHS
Created:Tue Jan 13 1987
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1706
Total number of notes:27193

356.0. "AEROSTAR 20/40" by DARTH::GAROZZO () Wed Nov 04 1987 11:29

    CURRENTLY THERE IS A NEW KIT CALLED THE MIDWEST AEROSTAR 20 OR 40.
    DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY EXPERIENCE IN BUILDING OR FLYING IT?
    THANKS.
    
    BOB G.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
356.1NICE PLANES!MDVAX1::SPOHRWed Nov 04 1987 16:1116
    Bob,
    
    Two quys at field fly the Aerostar 40.  It is a nice looking plane.
    I have not flown one, but those who have say they are just as nice
    as my PT40.  They say it is a great beginners plane.  
    
    It appears to be a simple kit to build and also durable.  One guy
    flew his threw the trees and all that he had to do was rebuild the
    wing and touch-up the fuselage.
    
    If your looking for a first plane, I suggest starting with a .40
    size as when it's up there it's easier to see.
    
    Regards,
    Chris Spohr
    
356.2I got a -20 for ChristmasTALLIS::ILESMike Iles - Advanced Vax DevelopmentTue Dec 29 1987 13:008
    Did you get an AEROSTAR? I got the -20 in my Christmas stocking,
    and have just started building it.
    
    It seems a very well produced kit

    -Mike-
    
356.5AEROSTAR .40COMET::CRONKMon Jun 27 1988 14:1824
    JOHN,
     
    I don't live in your area, I live out in Colo. Spgs.  I have just
    finished an aerostar .40, which is the same airplane as yours with
    the exception of being about 10 inches larger.  I found it to be
    a very easy airplane to build.  A couple of suggestions though:
    starting at the tail, the vert. stabalizer is not that strong when
    mounted the way the plans say, so what I did was put three tabs
    along the bottem edge to give it more strength when glued.  Also
    with horizontal stabalizer I didn't glue it directly to the bottem
    of the fuselage I inserted it about half way between the top and
    bottem of the back of the fuselage, making it stronger and also
    cleaned up the pushrod exits from the airplane, I now have the elevator
    pushrod coming directly straight out the back and hooked to the
    clevis.  Doing it this way you don't have any flex in your elevator
    which can come in extremly handy in emergency situations. 
    
    If I think of any other tricks I have done I will let you know.
    
    If you have any questions while building it just ask.
    
     SCOTT
    
         
356.6Aerostar instructions wrongIOENG::JWILLIAMSZeitgeist ZoologyTue Jun 28 1988 14:0726
    I've scrapped the idea of building the kit strictly by the
    instructions. I found a discrepancy between the instructions and
    the plans last night while building the wings. No major hassle,
    I'm glad I'm a skeptic and fit things together before committing
    the kit to glue. In the wing there are two spruce braces that run
    down the length of the wing, one on the bottom surface, and one
    on the top of the cambered surface. The instructions call out for
    the spruce brace to be glued right at the back edge of the bottom
    leading edge panel. Checking the plans, it shows the spruce bar
    located a quarter inch in from the edge of the panel. Well, the
    plans were right, the instructions were wrong.
    
    I guess the message here is to try fitting as much of an assembly
    together as you can before you make even your first glue joint.
    This can save you alot of pain, as CA is pretty tough, and I think
    it's fair to say that the balsa would break first.
    
    So far I've found the kit fairly easy to build, and I am still pleased
    with it. The bottom of the wing is flat, I don't know what this
    means in terms of aerodynamics ( needs a large stabilizer? ), but
    it sure makes things easy during the building stage. This model
    is turning out to be a real pleasure to build. I considered getting
    an ARF originally, but what can I say, if I had, I would have been
    missing out on half the fun.
    
    						John.