T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
138.4 | Electronic speed control plans?? | MDADMN::EATOND | Dan Eaton | Wed Jan 14 1987 17:30 | 7 |
| Anybody out there have plans for an electronic speed control for an
RC car. I'm not into cars but a friend of mine is and he's looking
to build one.
Thanks,
Dan Eaton
|
138.7 | let's design one for both cars and planes | HPSCAD::WFIELD | | Thu Jan 15 1987 12:51 | 22 |
| O.K. what features are you interested in?
I would like to see the following:
1) It should be able get speed information directly
from the receiver (eliminate the throttle servo).
2) It should also have a power tap for the receiver.
(eliminate the battery pack).
3) If item 2 is implemented it should shut down the
throttle when the batteries get low.
4) It should be light enough to be used in electric
planes (my interest) or cars.
5) Since you can buy one of these things off the shelf
It should be cheap and easy to build. (Don't know
if this ones possible)
Anybody got any other suggestions?
Wayne...
|
138.8 | Reverse ? | BARAKA::LEE | | Thu Jan 15 1987 18:13 | 7 |
|
One more,
If possible, I would like to have at least one reverse speed, to
get out of a state of stuckness. (RC offroad)
Lorrin Lee
|
138.9 | My contribution... | DESENG::ORLANDO | | Fri Jan 16 1987 14:55 | 23 |
|
What about six or seven 25 amp FETS in parallel, this would minimize
voltage drop. One 25 amp fet for brake.
No reverse by now... Sorry Lorrin thats coming in the second revision.
The reverse can easily be implemented by a relay to switch polarity.
We need to switch on and off the FETS to achieve the variable speed
effect.
How do we drive the FETS and decode the receiver commands?
I propose a modular design in which the power switch section (FETS)
lies (ellectrically - not phisically) separated from the command
decoding function. In that way it's easier to modify the design
to fit most popular receivers (let's say FUTABA, AIRTRONICS, etc).
Let's go on...
Orlando.
|
138.10 | F-V Converter | CLOSUS::TAVARES | John--Stay low, keep moving | Fri Jan 16 1987 16:45 | 5 |
| In my musings of such a design, I thought of taking the 1-2
millisecond decoded pulse from the RX and using it to key a frequency
to voltage converter. The output of the VFC would charge a
capacitor/resistor network to an isolating OPAMP, which in turn drives
the FETs. Howzatt?
|
138.11 | Sounds good, more details please... | DESENG::ORLANDO | | Thu Jan 22 1987 13:50 | 8 |
|
We need to provide to the FETS a square waveform of varying duty
cycle to achieve the variable speed effect.
How do we get this from the VFC output?
Orlando.
|
138.12 | Digitally | GOLD::GALLANT | | Thu Jan 22 1987 14:33 | 7 |
|
Put the VFC output through any digital gate, or perhaps if 0.8v
to 4.0v are not the levels there are lots of level converting types
of circuits you can use.
Mike
|
138.13 | | CLOSUS::TAVARES | John--Stay low, keep moving | Thu Jan 22 1987 15:02 | 5 |
| Fingers going faster than the brain...what I meant was FVC;
frequency-to-voltage converter. For instance, the National LM2907 or
LM2917 Frequency to Voltage Converter (Linear Databook, 1982,
National Semiconductor, pg 9-135). The voltage output of the
converter would be buffered by the opamp to directly drive the FETs.
|
138.14 | Servo control is PWM, not FM | TONTO::SCHRADER | Share and Enjoy! | Mon Jan 26 1987 09:57 | 18 |
| RE: .9
You don't really want a FVC. The frequency of the pulse train coming
out of the receiver is constant (well, approximately).
What you really want is a pulse width to voltage converter.
The simplest approach is to charge a cap from a constant current source
for the duration of the pulse.
The longer the pulse, the higher the cap's voltage. When the pulse
is over, save the voltage in a sample and hold ckt of some sort.
Also, directly driving the FETs to control the motor voltage wastes
the battery since there is a lot of dissipation in the FETs. Instead
drive the FETs with a pulse width modulatior (PWM). A 555 or 556
could probably be rigged up to work. An interisting possability
would be to use an ordinary servo control IC as the PWM generator
but use tachometer feedback (maybe a FVC using a one-shot) rather than
position feedback. This would allow accurate motor speed control based
on the transmitter's throttle position, and handle the interface to
the receiver.
|
138.15 | | CLOSUS::TAVARES | John--Stay low, keep moving | Mon Jan 26 1987 11:41 | 13 |
| RE: -1
Yeah, after I wrote that, I realized the problem with the
FVN approach...the demodulated channel signal is a nominal
1.5 millisecond pulse with an approximately 18 millisecond
interval. Probably would not work with the FVN.
Your approach is a little more complex, but, you're right on
the FET current drain. The big hitch that I see for a start
is that the servo driver IC's from Signetics are hard to
get. I think that ACE and DigiKey have them, but that's
about all.
Gonna extract your note and kick it around a little.
|
138.16 | EMF braking | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | There is no 'N' in TURNKEY | Tue Jan 27 1987 18:06 | 6 |
| An additional feature...
EMF braking. Something like 1/2 the "reverse" range gives braking,
more reverse actually gives reverse power. EMF braking turns the
motor into a generator, actually charging the battery from the
cars kinetic energy.
|
138.19 | Schematics Found | NEPTUN::DUPRE | | Wed Mar 18 1987 11:31 | 7 |
| For those of you still looking for a schematic for a speed control.
The April 87 issue of Model Builder has two. The first is a digital
proportional control with reverse for 6-24 VDC. The second is a
ON-OFF motor control circuit. You will find them in the electronics
corner on page 32.
- Bob
|
138.1 | Maybe this is the one for me? | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | There is no 'N' in TURNKEY | Tue Apr 21 1987 19:00 | 4 |
| Mind filling me in? I don't get RCM. Can you give more details on
the article, and what the control is for, cars or planes? Does it
have reverse or braking? What does it cost? Do I have to etch a
board? Etc, etc?
|
138.2 | speed controller details | TARKIN::DESHARNAIS | | Wed Apr 22 1987 00:08 | 13 |
| The speed control is for planes. The module measures 1" X 2.6" X
.75" and weighs about an ounce. The following are available from
the author:
PC board $5.00
MOSFETS (4) $12.00
all parts $25.00
assembled unit $39.95
If you're interested, I can send you a copy of the plans. The article
includes the schematic and PC artwork.
- Ron
|
138.20 | Model Builder Speed Controller Schematic | CHEFS::EASTON | Howard Easton - Information Services | Fri Nov 06 1987 07:40 | 16 |
| Hi, I have just brought my son a Hornet kit for his Christmas
present.
I have noticed that there has been a discussion on electronic
speed controllers (note 8). The conclusion was that a schematic
was published in the April '87 issue of Model Builder. As
locating this publication here in the U.K. could be a bit of a
problem...
My question is this. Does anyone have a copy of this article, and
would they be willing to copy/post it to me?
My mail address is;
Howard Easton @REO G/3-2
Regards, Howard.
|
138.21 | More Elec. Speed Cntrlr. Plans | SKYLRK::TEERLINK | | Mon Nov 30 1987 10:44 | 15 |
| Hi Howard!
I had read you note on 6 Nov. and was wondering if anyone had gotten
a copy of the the April issue to you. I could probably get you
one. But I did notice another set of plans for Electronic speed
controller in the December 1987 issue of Radio Control Modeler.
On Pg. 184, plans, description and ordering info are all provided.
The controller referenced here is good for boats and cars. One
point though, it isn't full speed reversing. The author suggests
that full speed reversing strips gears in cars and floods boats.
Anyway, if you're interested and can't get a copy over there, let
me know and I be happy to send you one.
Dave Teerlink.
|
138.3 | Another Plan from RCM | SKYLRK::TEERLINK | | Mon Dec 07 1987 13:17 | 4 |
| If still interested see note 8.19.
Dave T.
|
138.22 | articles on speed controllers | 3D::COMINS | | Tue Feb 02 1988 09:03 | 45 |
|
The May '87 issue of RCM and the April '87 issue of Model
Builder had articles on building an electronic speed control.
I'll try to give a summary of the 'features' of the circuits in
both articles with some comments from a car enthusiast's point
of view.
RCM - May '87 (page 176)
The speed controller described in this article uses mosfets in
the motor drive circuit. The controller provides proportional
speed control with a 'fail-safe' circuit that shuts down the
motor if the radio signal is lost. Features missing are reverse
and braking. Circuit schematics, parts list, and foil patterns
for the pc board are included in the article. A brief overview
of circuit design and operation is given as well. IRFZ30 mosfets
are used in the design resulting in a .12 volt drop at 10 amps.
The author indicates that using IRFZ40 mosfets the drop can be
cut in half. This is still far from being as efficient as the
better mosfet controllers you can buy. Parts are available
postpaid from the articles author.
Howard W. Cano
7057 Vivian Ct.
Arvada, Colorado 80004
PC Board $ 5.00
IRFZ30 Mosfets (set of 4) $12.00
Complete Kit $25.00
Assembled and Tested Unit $39.95
Model Builder - April '87 (page 32)
This article actually has two 'motor' controllers. One is a
simple on/off controller using a relay as the switch mechanism.
Clearly this is of no interest to anyone wanting a 'speed'
controller. The other circuit is implemented using bipolar
transistors. The bipolar transistors have a 1 volt drop at 15
amps so this makes a poor efficiency unit that results in very
hot transistors. The transistors have a 25 amp continuous rating
and 40 amp surge. If your interested in building a decent speed
controller this design may be a good example of what not to
build.
|
138.23 | a DIY project | GRAMPS::WCLARK | Walt Clark | Thu Jun 15 1989 12:29 | 55 |
| I have completed a speed controller recently. It was intended to
be as much a learning exercise (about the Radio Control part of RC)
as an applied gizmo. Since there are several high performance
speed controllers on the market (eg Novak), I did not expect to
break new ground.
The unit is based on my own functional analysis and a published
aircraft speed controller which used a CMOS HEX Inverter for the control
function. It was designed initially to provide either Forward-
Neutral-Brake or Forward-Neutral-Reverse which was switch selectable.
It is also fully proportional and operates in a PWM mode. It
automatically shuts down if the receiver losses contact with the
transmitter.
I used 3 CMOS IC's, the HEX Inverter, a quad XOR, and a quad AND.
The output was thru an H-bridge amp consisting of paralleled IRFZ40's
for forward branches and single IRFZ40's for the Brake/Reverse
function.
The unique, and limiting part of this design (other than having reverse
as an option) was the stacking of the control and receiver logic
power on top of the motor power pack voltage. There are 2 advantages
to this. 1) I can get well over 10 volts (12-14) driving the gates
of the output HEXFETS which allows the HEXFET ON resistance to approach
the rated 25 milliohms each, thus increasing energy transfer between
battery and motor, 2) The radio/servo battery prevents loss of or
unpredictable control when the motor battery begins to reach the
end of its discharge cycle. The limiting part is obviously the need
for the receiver/servo battery (although this can be replaced with a
DC-DC converter, you would lose advantage 2).
After bench testing the design and being satisfied, we went to the
field. There we found something was causing the etch which provided
current during Reverse to overheat and lift. Since we wanted to go
forward with the unit and not spend too much time chasing it down,
I reconnected the 8 HEXFETS in a more conventional source follower
forward, short the motor windings brake mode. In this configuration
the controller has a less than .004V/A drop. The unit also remains
relatively cool to touch after a full charge run on the track using
a stock Reedy motor.
I constructed the unit in a 1.5 x 1.5 x .5 package which was potted
in polyester foam and coated with plastic film. Including wires
and connectors it weighs 2 oz.
I spent about $35 all together on new materials (I had everything
except the HEXFETS already). It would cost about $45 in material to
duplicate what I have. The equivilant unit in the marketplace
(ie Tower Hobbies) sells for about $140-$170.
I am willing to share the schematic and layout to anyone brave or
fool enough to want to do one yourself. If you are not good
technically though dont even consider it.
Walt
|
138.24 | Polyester Foam? | K::FISHER | Stop and Smell the Balsa! | Thu Jun 15 1989 13:41 | 14 |
| > I constructed the unit in a 1.5 x 1.5 x .5 package which was potted
> in polyester foam and coated with plastic film. Including wires
> and connectors it weighs 2 oz.
Walt - I was also playing with a soldering iron lately. How did you go
about the "polyester foam and plastic film coating"? I have a simple
open circuit board that I would like to pack and protect.
Please describe the materials and procedure.
Bye --+--
Kay R. Fisher |
---------------O---------------
================================================================================
|
138.25 | well maybe its polyurethane or PVC... | GRAMPS::WCLARK | Walt Clark | Thu Jun 15 1989 14:10 | 10 |
| I have a piece on that in ELECTRO_HOBBY. Note 607 I think.
Basically I created a teflon coated mold form. I set the module
into that and injected polyester foam from a can of that stuff
that Grossman's sells to insulate your inside electrical outlets from
drafts. It takes about 18 hours to cure out, and I had to add more
foam and reinsert the unit into the mold twice to fill the voids
completely.
Walt
|
138.26 | place to buy FET's and books | LEDS::COHEN | Look! I've changed my P.N. | Fri Feb 23 1990 15:46 | 19 |
| A great place for FETs is Active Electronics in Westboro, Ma. They
carry a very wide variety, including most of the BUZ component lines
(these seem to be the most popular in ESCs, BUZ11 is what I've seen the
most of). Also, they carry books, one particular set would be of
interest to you, I own it, it's a MOSFET application guide and a MOSFET
handbook (can't remember the manufacturer right now). Very complete,
with Industry Cross Reference.
One of the nice things about FETs is, provided they have the necessary
current handling capability, you can get lower on resistance from a high
resistance part simply by adding more of the same FETs in parallel. As
you shop around, you might keep this in mind. Very low On-resistance
FETs are expensive, but a decent intermediate range component, in
sufficient quantity to give you the desired resistance (when hooked up
in parallel) might well price out much cheaper. You will of course
sacrifice some weight, but the FET's only weigh in at a few grams a
piece, and there's about 28 grams to an ounce, so you could have quite a
few FETs before you need to worry about how much they're weighing down a
plane.
|
138.27 | ESC plans and references | KAY::FISHER | Stop and smell the balsa. | Thu Apr 11 1991 13:02 | 80 |
| This looked like a good reference from the usenet.
Bye --+--
Kay R. Fisher |
---------------O---------------
################################################################################
Article 4351
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: rec.models.rc
Subject: ESC references
Date: 10 Apr 91 06:12:48 GMT
Organization: University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Sorry about taking so long to post this, but when I had the spare time the
system was always down!
Well, here are the references I have to Electronic Speed Controllers. They are
in the format:
MAGAZINE, DATE, TITLE, AUTHOR, PAGE
my comments on the article
********************************
Model Builder, Dec. 1990, Electronic Speed Controls, Bob Boucher (Astro
Flight), p48
Good introduction to ESC's. Compares the theoretical performance
of resistor type controllers, low rate controllers, and high rate
controllers. Does NOT provide any circuits.
Model Builder, Feb. 1989, Making an Economy Electronic Throttle, Howard W.
Cano, p31
Construction article for a simple and very compact proportional ESC.
Contains circuit diagram, PCB artwork and circuit discription. Uses
3 MOSFET's, a 4069 CMOS hex invertor, two transistors, and a few
diodes, resistors and capacitors. Handles up to 24 cells and works
by stretching the output pulses from the receiver.
Model Builder, Apr. 1987, Electronics Corner, Eloy Marez, p32
Contains two circuits, both using the NE544 chip. One is for a
proportional ESC with reverse for 6-24 volts, while the other is for
a simple on-off controller using a relay.
Model Builder, Jan. 1987, Electronics Corner?, Eloy Marez?
I haven't seen this article, however it is refered to in the April
1987 article (previous reference).
Radio Control Models & Electronics, Aug. 1983, Motor Switch, Roger Todd, p650
Gives circuit diagram, description and PCB artwork for a on-off RC
driven switch. It has adjustable turn on and turn off points, and was
designed to switch the motor from the elevator channel in a two
channel system (full up/full down to switch on/off). It also
incorporates a low voltage cutoff and battery eliminator circuit.
Designed to work with 5 to 10 cells.
********************************
In my Electra I use an on/off type controller built around a NE544 IC. I
designed it myself, however it is very similar to that given in the April 87
issue of Model Builder. The motor that came with my kit had a capacitor
connected across the terminals for noise suppression. I found that I still
suffered from glitches, however (in this model I use a Futaba Sky Attack 3
channel radio on 40 MHz). To overcome this I soldered a capacitor (47nF)
between each terminal and the motor case. Since doing this I have had no
further problems with glitching, even though I have a direct connection between
my motor battery and receiver battery grounds.
*********************************************************
Chris Kaiser
Postgrad - Elec Eng Dept
Canterbury University
Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
E.MAIL: [email protected]
*********************************************************
"When you're fresh out of lawyers
You don't know how good it's gonna feel"
- Al Stewart, 1988
*********************************************************
|