T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
626.1 | What do you mean, We crossed the Haig line? | FARAD::GIBSON | Bug Hunter Dtn 225-5193 | Wed Mar 07 1990 09:07 | 33 |
| Hi Jim
Running at night is really no different than running in the day time.
You just need to reduce your speed and be more alert. The only time we
use "Headlights" Spotlights is when in a mooring area or in a lobsta
pot minefield. Otherwise your night vision is ruined by the white
light.
I plan on rigging my cabin with red lamps this year, as every time
someone turns on the gally lamps I go blind for a half hour until my
eyes readjust. Also I plan on rigging a quad set of quartz halogen
amber fog lamps on the bow rails for running the channels at night.
Be sure to study your Chapmans lighting section. Pay Particuler
attention too Tugs with Tows & fishing vessels. They are the most
dangerous, Not omitting Yahoos running at full throttle without nav
lights.
One more point. Never Trust the bow lights on small craft. They are all
too often reversed. "Funny, I thought I had the right of way"
Splash!,Glug,Glug.
The first time you run at night in a Fog bank will be you most exciting
trip... I won't spoil it for you by describing the thrill of it all.
Bon Appetife
Walt
|
626.2 | It's MUCH different! | CSMET2::CHACE | It's *snowing* at MY house! | Wed Mar 07 1990 12:48 | 22 |
|
I have run at night a number of times. Mostly in congested,
rock, fish and lobster trap infested, shoal waters. :-(
It wasn't easy or fun. In my case, I considered myself fortunate
to get back each time without a mishap (never had one, thank God).
The runs we usually made were about 15 miles each way.
We did not have radar or loran, and most of the bouys we had to
use were unlit. (did have a close call with a NUN bouy) We would
run at just a little over trolling speed, get sightings from the
bouys that DID have lights, and use a (lousy) spotlight infrequently
to verify our position with respect to marker bouys and channels.
Also, our knowledge of the area helped a lot. I can imagine that
if we had better lights it would have been much easier (at least
there wouldn't have been the close calls with bouys or trouble staying
in a channel.
It definitely can be done with relative safety, BUT it's DEFINITELY
different!!
Have fun,
Kenny
|
626.3 | It would be fun | DNEAST::OKERHOLM_PAU | | Wed Mar 07 1990 16:24 | 12 |
| I've only run at night a couple times. It wasn't by choice on either
occation but I must say it was relatively enjoyable. I had LORAN and SONAR
so I felt pretty confident in where I was and how much water I had under me.
The only concern was lobster pot bouys and other flotsam that are hard to
see in the limited light.
Navigating from bouy to bouy was not difficult and you can see a lot
on a relatively clear night. I imagine that its easier to navigate even on a
cloudy/moonless night than in a daytime fog.
Evening on the water is kind of nice. Everything sounds different and
the lights that you take for granted on shore make an interesting sight. Be
careful but by all means go for it.
Paul
|
626.4 | more advice | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Mar 07 1990 18:10 | 40 |
| I've done quite a lot of night sailing, and while I quite enjoy it, it
is more difficult and somewhat more dangerous than daytime sailing.
First, even on a cloudy, moonless night there is a surprising amount of
light. Once your eyes are fully night adapted (and this can take half
an hour or more), you'll be able to see quite well. However, one (in my
view) absolutely essential piece of equipment for nighttime is a pair of
good quality 7x50 binoculars. It is amazing how much you can see with
them. Spotlights instantly ruin your night vision and only illuminate a
very limited field of view. With good 7x50s you'll see a lot more and
not lose your critical night adaptation. I've tried a spotlight only
once, and that showed me that I'd rather get along without it. At low
speed a person standing in the bow can see lobster bouys well enough to
avoid them without any artifical light, at least if there is starlight.
Second, you must know what the various running lights and bouy lights
are. And have charts.
Third, be sure your boat has adequate (very bright) running lights. Very
few boats do. For a definition of adequate see a boating catalog that
lists Aqua Signal series 40 and 41 lights. I'd use nothing less. The
usual running lights are invisible at a quarter mile on a clear night.
Fourth, see an interesting little book "The Pyschology of Sailing". It
discusses a number of psychological/physiological/physical processes that
affect us at night -- like why a distant red light looks white. We also
tend to judge a light's distance by its brightness, another reason why
dim navigation lights are dangerous. The crew on the approaching boat
may think you are much further away than you really are and therefore
not pay you as much attention as they should.
Fifth, be sure you know where you are at all times. If you're not sure,
stop until you are. On a really clear night, you may see enough lighted
bouys, etc, to be quite confusing. Go slow (I've felt uncomfortable at
4 knots in a crowded harbor).
Sixth, if you can, find someone with night experience for the first few
times.
It is fun, but be careful.
|
626.5 | | ROBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Thu Mar 08 1990 07:54 | 31 |
| Underway at night is indeed beautiful under clear WX conditions. The
location makes a lot of difference.
In Lake Winnipesaukee (NH) it's a bit of an anxiety trip, because the
high horizon caused by the surrounding terrain seems to add to the
darkness. And, *every* time I've been out at night I've come upon a
too-small boat under way with zero lights. The nuts are afloat in NH.
Out of Hampton, the lobsta buoys around the shoals are a problem, and
further out, along a line from the Isles of Shoals to Thatcher's I've
seen enough floating debris that I slow down and keep a better watch.
From Sakonnet to Point Judith the fish trap areas have brought my heart
right up into my mouth at night. And, over the years, at least a dozen
times I've listened to the VHF (at night) as a bad scene plays out, with
the central characters being (usually) a sailboat, a fishtrap off Newport
or Sakonnet Point, and the Coast Guard.
Areas of lobster fishing are slightly predictable by looking at the
charts. Rocky bottom on shoal areas can give you a clue that there COULD
be lobsta pots theyah.
Knowing the characteristics of the lights on the ATONs is mandatory.
There are various regulations prohibiting you from shining your 5,000,000
candlepower spotlight into the wheelhouse of another boat, but the best
reason not to do that is that it's going to destroy YOUR night vision for
a while. Loran, depthfinder, current charts, local knowledge, and common
sense are the best tools to have with you at night.
If there are two people aboard, and if the boat's big enough, radar would
complete the picture.
|
626.6 | Phosphores on the wake | FARAD::GIBSON | Bug Hunter Dtn 225-5193 | Thu Mar 08 1990 11:27 | 13 |
| Another point about night running is Safety. This just came to mind as
I was thinking about replacing lifejacket lights. These little lights
can make quite a differance with a MOB at night. I also have Caylum
light sticks tied onto each life jacket as backups. Allong with that
should be the standard whisel and everybody should were their jacket at
night. and safety lines should be worn when going forward on deck.
Of course a lighted beacon bouy should be ready on board, just in case.
Its amazing how much "Junk" a person can get on a boat. Isn't it?
Walt
|
626.7 | Pre-dawn Puget Sound | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Thu Mar 08 1990 13:15 | 32 |
| I think .6's suggestions are excellent. I can see the use for the
whistle in daylight as well as night.
When I go out on Puget Sound for salmon, I usually put out about 45
minutes before first light. It's still pitch black. Most of the spots
I head for are within 8 miles. I know the way and can navigate by
compass on all trips.
My problem is not lobster pots and typically not kooks without lights;
but dead heads. Puget Sound has a lot of wood floating around in it:
including pieces of lumber (all sizes), large branches/trees and the
true dead heads. I tend to run just on plane and stare about 20 yards
ahead. I don't use a spotlight, as I think it would make the situation
worse. I don't look back because my anchor light would blind me, as
has been discussed.
Usually, I can see floating wood objects in time. My one fear is that
I hit that classic dead head one day. (Once in BC I saw an entire tree
that was verticle, upside with just about 2" of the trunk sticking up
out of the water. The water was so clear, I could see the entire tree
which must have been 20-30' tall (deep). I barely saw it in broad
daylight while trolling until I was on top of it....at night......no
way)
Sometimes, the moon will be right at the end of my course and I can
follow the moonlight. In the moon's reflection on the water, I can see
objects pretty well. I treasure these mornings.
I guess I consider the risk of night running to be the price of doing
business on Puget Sound. I don't like it, but I putup with it.
/bret
|
626.8 | | SDEVAX::THACKERAY | | Fri Mar 09 1990 17:46 | 24 |
| The last two seasons, I've run at night almost every weekend up and
down the length of Naragansett Bay. About the only time I've used a
spotlight is in identifying buoys and other miscellaneous flotsam and
jetsam, which appears to be intrinsically nocturnal. It's been
wonderful, and two or three times in the same area, one tends to feel
fairly comfortable. I tend to run on the charts and the depth, and
following the odd lighted bouy (about one in six in RI).
The only time I got worried was when the fog really came in, but I
wasn't too far out of Providence, so promptly turned back and made it
to the hurricane barriers by dead reckoning. Try to get a feel for
which direction the fog is coming from; you may wish to avoid it.
Anyway, it IS nice to stay out until the wee early hours at a
restaurant. The bay is very quiet at night and the water generally
mirror-like, which means that you can run at just over planing speed.
I have seen quite a few cigarette-type boats cruising at 30-40 knots at
night. I only shake my head in wonder. These guys typically run from
their Lorans (and probably can't see the ends of their noses). One boat
last year ran right up onto a breakwater, the entire boat on top of the
barrier, about 10 feet above sea level. That one was on telly!
Ray
|
626.9 | Rambling | BTOVT::JPETERS | John Peters, DTN 266-4391 | Wed Mar 14 1990 15:52 | 17 |
| When I'm running at night, glare from my masthead light affects my
night vision; I am ordering a glare shield from Boat US for a short
term fix, plan eventually to rerig the whole setup.
For calibration, I'm in a 21' cuddy rig; I set up a ten foot mast to
get the light someplace up and out of the way, but it's still
bothersome.
My neighbor put in a yard light, which effectively blinds me trying to
find my mooring light at night; leaving a cyalume stick on the dink
helps.
Once your eyes are dark-adapted, the running lights will sufficiently
illuminate the reflectors on buoys so you can see them in good
conditions and at reasonable speeds...
J
|
626.10 | | KEEPER::THACKERAY | | Fri Apr 06 1990 14:57 | 5 |
| I find that my masthead light is a pain, too. At first, I put on a
peaked cap to shield it. Now I just put up the bimini top, which
conceals it from the wheelhouse.
Ray
|
626.11 | Glare eliminator | BIZNIS::CADMUS | | Fri Apr 20 1990 16:22 | 43 |
|
Her's a couple of things you can do to minimize the "glare problem and
the problem of locating your dinghy or mooring at night.
. Glare shield on light (minimially effective- but helps
. put a 3v Zener diode in series with the light- and bypass the zever
with a second switch.-
switch open- 12v bulb w/9v on it (the zener will give a constant 3v
across it) the light is quite visible- but minimal glare
switch closed- bright light w/glare (full 12v across bulb)
I've gone past the harbor patrol with the light on low and have never
been stopped (probably because they are tooling around with NO lights!)
I still havenm't fopund a GOOD 100% lega way to solve the glare
problem on a small powerboat(mines's 22'). I've even thought of putting
a light mounted through the canvas and tied to one of the top bows.
My boat has a large foredeckwith a lot of rise to it, and with the
light mounted just above the windshiels , I usually run around at night
looking at the bright white deck- the zener solution really helps,
although I've found that a 6v is even better except for the low light./
. TO find your mooring at night this is what I use- (I keepa dinghy on
my mooring)
. reflective tape strip (red/white) all around the dinghy just below
the gunwales as well as a stripe around the mooring float- works great
with even a flashlight.
. I saw an advertisenment recently for a radio controlled light/pick up
buoy. When you get close to your mooring- turn on the hand held
xmitter and the buoy starts to flash- 'twasn't cheap, though.
|
626.12 | Careful about reduced intensity lights! | AWRY::CREASER | | Thu May 03 1990 10:01 | 9 |
| Just a friendly reminder that the Inland and International Navigation Rules
spell out the minimum visable range for required Navigation lights. If you
alter the height, configuration, color or intensity, you may have placed your
vessel in violation of the NAVRULES.
Don't want anyone to get tagged or worse in up in an accident.
Happy and safe
Jerry
|
626.13 | | BTOVT::JPETERS | John Peters, DTN 266-4391 | Thu May 03 1990 13:30 | 2 |
| You're right, it would violate Navrules, but so does turning the lights
off so you can see...
|
626.14 | Night Boating Accident | NEMAIL::COLVIN | | Mon Mar 29 1993 14:47 | 47 |
| Just a recent incident on night operation...
I just returned from a week in the Orlando, Florida area (yes, it was
wonderful to see boats floating in warm water under 80 degree sunny
skies) but the week was marred by a boating accident a few miles from
where we were staying with my parents. It probably made the news up
here in New England but was all over the Orlando papers, regarding the
three Cleveland Indians baseball pitchers in the bass boat who collided
with a dock on a small lake at night. They were heading to one end of
the small lake to meet a friend who was late in arriving, at a high
rate of speed, just after dark on an overcast night with no moon.
They collided with the end of a 185 foot dock. The dock level was 3-4
feet above the water and they contacted the dock about 10 feet from the
end at a place where it formed a tee shape. The boat passed under the
dock, shearing off two 4x6" posts. The boat was found about 100 feet
past the dock. It was an 18 foot bass boat with a 150 HP outboard. The
driver on the starboard side (Steve Olin, I believe was his name) was
killed instantly, the middle passenger, Tim Crews, died the next day,
and the port passenger, Bob Ojeda, survived with face and scalp
lacerations. He was hospitalized for 3 days. All three struck the dock
head high. Olin and crews died of massive head injuries. Although
alcohol was on board, blood tests determined that it was not a factor.
The remote control handle was found at full throttle, although this
could have been moved during or after the answer. The nav lights were
on. Witnesses said they saw and heard a boat traveling at high spped
followed by a loud thump. Florida laws did not require lights or
reflector on a dock of that length. Olin was leasing a house on the
lake and was an experienced boat operator and fisherman. He had owned
the boat for several years. It appears that the boat struck the dock at
a slight angle, starboard side first. I would guess that is probably
why Ojeda survived. On leaving the hospital he said he had no memory of
the accident.
This should remind us all of the dangers of high speed at night, even
though we are familiar with the waters. If they had been ten feet to
port they would have missed the dock entirely. There were several
articles in the Orlando paper seeking speed limits, particularly at
night, although the authorities said collisions with docks were quite
rare. They recommended spot lights when operating close to shore. Last
year I started using one of the 12 volt hand-held ones when close to
shore to find my mooring and it worked very well, much better than the
old flashlight. Yes, it kills your night vision, but by then I am
around other moored boats, looking for my mooring. Here's wishing you a
safe new boating season.
Larry
|
626.15 | | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Mon Mar 29 1993 15:02 | 2 |
| 18' bass boat (i.e., a very light boat) with 150HP??
|
626.16 | Most common tournament rig... | BUOVAX::SURRETTE | | Mon Mar 29 1993 15:24 | 14 |
| The 'Standard' tournament bass boat is usually 17' to 19' long and
powered by a 150 HP. Many bass fishing organizations limit the
maximum horsepower to 150, while others are limited only to the
Coast Guard horsepower rating of the boat. Bass boats can be as
large as 21' or so and some are rated as high as 235 HP.
FWIW, a friend of mine has a 20' Bass boat with a 200 Hp. Outboard
that is capable of 70-75 MPH. The boat handles very well even at
high speeds, when the water is relatively smooth.
I guess it's all in the design....
Gus
|
626.17 | | STIMPY::QUODLING | | Mon Mar 29 1993 19:45 | 5 |
| 75 Miles per hour, at night, without headlights, is down right
stupid...
q
|
626.18 | no sympathy for the driver | COAL05::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Mon Mar 29 1993 20:08 | 19 |
|
The issue here is one of operating "under control". I would no more operate
my bass boat on plane at night than I would drive my car at 55mph in a dense
fog, or without my headlights. Anytime you can't see beyond your ability to
react and evade you're in big trouble. I've occasionally heard/seen boats
"on-plane" at night in the lake where we have a cottage. There are canoes and
small fishing boats with out lights, swimmers, flotsam etc. in that water at
night, just like there is during the day, only during the day you can see them.
There was a beautiful young woman, a friend of my wife's family, killed on
Lake Webster last summer because some hotdog was doing the same thing,
operating on plane at night. As I recall that idiot was pulling a skier.
I feel sorry for families and the fans of the 2 ball players killed last
week, but whoever was driving the boat that night was running on PDL (pure dumb
luck) and it ran out. It's too bad for the other 2 guys, but the driver was
asking for it.
Al
|
626.19 | out of control | CARROL::YELINEK | WITHIN 10 | Tue Mar 30 1993 20:37 | 8 |
|
....now add alcohol
Yesterday the news said alcohol was on board but didn't play a role...
Today the news said that the driver had a .15 alcohol blood concentration.
|
626.20 | .15 or .015 B.A.C.? | UNIFIX::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Wed Mar 31 1993 09:02 | 6 |
| What I saw in the paper a couple of days ago was not .15 B.A.C. but
.015 B.A.C. - which might equate to 1 beer. - Way below the usual .1
limit.
Bill
|
626.21 | | WONDER::COYLE | | Wed Mar 31 1993 09:26 | 5 |
| CNN - had a local Sheriff on this morning who said 0.14% BAC. This
is above the legal limit for operating in Florida. He also
suggested this should make people think; Sure.
-Joe
|
626.22 | New Data | NEMAIL::COLVIN | | Wed Mar 31 1993 12:00 | 11 |
| Well, so much for my reporting accuracy. Tim Crews was the driver,
and the last article that I read had said that the authorities had not
released the BAL, but the reporter had some info that alcohol was not
a factor. Yesterday they announced that Crews' BAL was .14, above the
legal .10 level. They also announced that both Olin's and Ojeda's BAL
was well below the .10 limit. Florida, like many other States has
pending legislation to lower the legal BAL limit, in their case to
.08 %. The medical reports also indicated that none of the three had
seen the dock coming, based upon the injuries.
Larry
|
626.23 | Night time, no lights, what gives? | KAHALA::SUTER | Never too Hot! | Wed Mar 31 1993 12:05 | 19 |
|
>"on-plane" at night in the lake where we have a cottage. There are canoes and
>small fishing boats with out lights, swimmers, flotsam etc. in that water at
>night, just like there is during the day, only during the day you can see them.
Just a nit.... at least in NH, aren't small fishing boats and
canoes which are more than 150 feet from shore at night supposed
to carry a minimum of a flashlight in order to signal oncoming
boats of their presence?
Also, wouldn't it be a little suicidal to swim any distance
from shore at night w/o a boat(lighted) escort, even with a boat
escort....maybe if the boat was stopped? Of course, I wonder about
the sanity of people swimming in the middle of some lakes during
the day w/o boat escorts, also......
Rick
|
626.24 | I'll concede your point | COAL05::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Wed Mar 31 1993 13:37 | 39 |
| < Just a nit.... at least in NH, aren't small fishing boats and
< canoes which are more than 150 feet from shore at night supposed
< to carry a minimum of a flashlight in order to signal oncoming
< boats of their presence?
You are correct Rick, small boats are supposed to have a flashlight at hand
to signal other boat traffic. However at night it can be difficult to
determine the direction of travel of a boat you can't see. Navlights can be
tough to spot when there are lots of cottage lights dotting the shoreline. For
that matter a dim white flashlight is even harder to distinguish against that
background. How much time would it take for a person to determine there is a
threat, locate the flashlight and then start waving it around? I suppose a
prudent fisherman quietly bobbing around in the lake late at night would start
frantically waving that flashlight around as soon as the silence was shattered
by the revving engine.
I'll concede your point, but an analogy could be made that I got this black
eye as much because I didn't duck fast enough, as because someone took a poke
at me.
< Also, wouldn't it be a little suicidal to swim any distance
< from shore at night w/o a boat(lighted) escort, even with a boat
< escort....maybe if the boat was stopped? Of course, I wonder about
< the sanity of people swimming in the middle of some lakes during
< the day w/o boat escorts, also......
I'm only suggesting a swimmer may be there, not that it's a sane thing to
do. Typically the individual I saw frequently would swim parallel to the
shoreline only about 75' out.
My point is a driver is WRONG anytime he's not in control of his machine.
He's WRONG if he's unable complete evasive action within the range of his
vision.
As is the case with most incidents which are labeled ACCIDENTS, it's really
2 or more errors in judgement/execution which are coincident both in time and
space.
Al
|
626.25 | What's the solution? | 7198::WILSON | Think Spring! | Wed Mar 31 1993 14:01 | 14 |
| Hopefully something positive will come of this, and it can be used
as an example of the dangers of both drunken boating and speeding
in the dark. Unfortunately, I doubt that it'll have any lasting
effect.
I see and hear speeding boats after dark on Lake Winnie all the time.
And every year, one or more of them collide with another boat, run
up on shore, or have some other avoidable accident. Just about the
time you educate these guys, a whole new batch of idiots comes along.
I don't see the end in sight (must be too dark!).
Rick
|
626.26 | Collisions | SALEM::GILMAN | | Thu Apr 01 1993 15:39 | 6 |
| W.O.T. at night on a small lake. If that wasn't asking for it I
don't know what is. Some people seem to think that because they are
on a boat rather than driving a car that similiar conditions (in this
case poor visibility) don't cause similiar risks.... collisions.
Jeff
|
626.27 | | RTL::LINDQUIST | | Fri Apr 02 1993 15:43 | 4 |
| �� FWIW, a friend of mine has a 20' Bass boat with a 200 Hp. Outboard
�� that is capable of 70-75 MPH. The boat handles very well even at
Time to reinforce those docks...
|