T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
592.1 | Safety, like not spraying other boats?!?! | ARCHER::SUTER | Where will you be on December 8, 1989?? | Fri Jan 19 1990 13:33 | 16 |
|
RE: Denise
The only prop guard I've heard of is one a trailer, which
protects the prop when driving down the road. These are generally
found on trailers for inboard boats and some get quite frequent
use (Hi Doug)....
The trick to not being hit by the prop is common sense safety...
On an I/O or outboard always shut off the engine(s) when a person
is boarding. On any boat try and approach the downed skier from
the driver's side of the boat.. to name a few....
Come_on_spring!!!!
Rick
|
592.2 | A good idea in theory only | NRADM::WILSON | Bo knows water skiing? | Fri Jan 19 1990 13:47 | 19 |
|
I saw this very same question in the "tech questions" section
of a boat magazine recently. Their answer was that prop guards
are available for small, low speed/low horsepower fishing type
boats only. There ain't no such thing as a prop guard for your
Stingray for a number of reasons. The ones I can remember:
- Too much drag. Pushing a prop guard through the water at
40+ mph would take an enormous amount of h.p.
- The turbulence caused by the guard would cause prop cavitation.
You need smooth, solid water for the prop to get a good "grip"
on the water.
In short, the negatives outweigh the benefits. Just be sure
to turn the motor off when there are people in the water near
the stern of the boat and you should never have a problem.
Rick
|
592.3 | Guards can't replace safe handling | PACKER::GIBSON | DTN225-5193 | Fri Jan 19 1990 14:18 | 12 |
| One other thing I'd like to mention .
Whenever approching a person in the water, allways make the approch
downwind of the person. That way the boat does not get blown over the
person.
Allways shutdown the engine with it still in gear. Otherwise the prop
will keep spinning even though the engine is off.
I like the orange flag idea. Never heard of it before?
Walt
|
592.4 | Can't be too careful; or careful enough. | ULTRA::BURGESS | I don't DO big wakes | Fri Jan 19 1990 14:19 | 25 |
| re <<< Note 592.2 by NRADM::WILSON "Bo knows water skiing?" >>>
> -< A good idea in theory only >-
> - Too much drag. Pushing a prop guard through the water at
> 40+ mph would take an enormous amount of h.p.
> - The turbulence caused by the guard would cause prop cavitation.
> You need smooth, solid water for the prop to get a good "grip"
> on the water.
Bahh, isn't there some way of putting it in a tunnel ?
Maybe not.
re .0, .1
Right ! and try to get some good instruction in handling the
boat around skiers. It isn't easy to admit this, but I've actually
scratched skis that my daughter was STILL IN with a rotating prop -
thats as close as I ever want to come to slicing someone else up.
R
|
592.5 | To not hurt Flipper... | TAZRAT::WHYNOT | | Fri Jan 19 1990 14:25 | 10 |
| I've seen these prop guards in the underwater shots of boats on the
show "Flipper". (Didn't Porter Ricks have 2 on his Wellcraft?) :^)
Never seen 'em in real life..
The prop guards on trailers work well; Mine is pretty banged up. :) :)
Yo Rick: *ANY* boat (including inboards) should be shut off when
people are boarding or near the stern. (been meaning to talk to you
'bout that...The fumes are terrible :^) (besides more serious reasons)
Doug
|
592.6 | Try Boats/US for informantion | DUGGAN::PLUMLEY | | Fri Jan 19 1990 14:32 | 4 |
| Seems to me I recall seeing some pictures of prop guards not too long
ago. It could have been in the most recent mailer from Boats/US.
I'd double check for you, but I threw it away after a very quick skim.
Maybe someone else can help.
|
592.7 | Sting Rays are ECO'able; betcha ! | ULTRA::BURGESS | I don't DO big wakes | Fri Jan 19 1990 16:32 | 25 |
|
> RE: .4
>>> Tunnels
> Lots of boats (mostly inboards) have the prop protected by a tunnel or
> skeg, but that's not what the original question was. It's about adding
> some sort guard to cover the prop. Redesigning his Stingray to include
> a tunnel and then recessing the engine and drive into the tunnel probably
> wouldn't be real cost effective!
I meant something more like a tube, I think it then becomes a
nozzle drive, or some such. Bit o' sheet metal bent around something
like this; <hand waving> then some kind of a grille, say 2 inch
holes, over each end to keep the tootsies out (and the mantas, and
their tootsies).
re Doug: I've noticed that you keep your boat in gear and turn the
engine off when picking up a skier, even me. I hereby
DO resolve to make it a new season habit (and I'll try
to work on our friend to get him to do likewise (-: )
R {and I'm gonna steal most of Rick Wilson's old
personal name sometime early next week HaH ! }
|
592.8 | too much drag? go slower! | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Fri Jan 19 1990 16:42 | 6 |
| The most recent Boat/US flyer had a discussion of propeller guards. As
previously mentioned, the drag is horrendous at high speeds and fuel
consumption increases greatly. However, commercial lobstermen and many
commercial fishing boats have cages around their propellers to keep lines
and nets from fouling. Of course, they're low speed craft and the drag is
acceptable for them.
|
592.9 | Look deeper | SDEVAX::THACKERAY | | Wed Jan 24 1990 09:49 | 53 |
| Actually, I also read the Boat US article on Prop guards. I'm not sure
that drag was terribly bad and the point of the interest is that if
prop guards were mandatory, they would save a LARGE number of lives
each year. Also a lot of dinged props.
You have to be careful how you interpret what you read. For example,
the biggest lobby against prop guards is: YES you guessed it, the
PROPELLER MANUFACTURERS!!! Obviously, for every person props chew up,
they get a new propeller sale out of it.......but the buggers have
absolutely no right to be lobbying. I bet Boat US are influenced by
their views, and therefore you are, too.
I'd like to see unbiased tests, by UL or some independent group, on
performance and safety, before making decisions and I would expect Boat
US to do so too.
The other issue is the destruction of manatees by propeller damage
in Florida, I'd have thought it to be an excellent reason to make
guards mandatory on those rivers.
Yes, guards will produce drag and therefore detract from performance
and increase fuel consumption.
But they would save lives (for certain). They would save manatees,
probably the entire species.
Of course, there is the experienced boater lobby; those people who say
that they would NEVER approach a skiier, etc., without turning off
their engine. I agree with that, by the way. If the engine is running,
then the prop MAY be turning. It's incredibly easy to accidentally
knock the gear lever, or for it not to be fully off and "click" into
gear by itself, or simple error to occur.
Anyway, the whole issue is not as simple as the Boat US article would
have us believe.
My personal vote is:
Prop guards in certain waterways to protect endangered species.
Prop guards easily available for fishermen and those who have no need
for performance, with reduced insurance rates for users.
Mandatory boating lessons/exam to teach the 95% of the boaters who
really don't understand the simplest rules, then they shouldn't need
prop guards.
Tally-ho!
Ray
|
592.10 | thanks | CVG::CARR | | Wed Jan 24 1990 12:51 | 17 |
| Thanks for all the replies.
Most of you who responded assumed the scenario of picking up a skier.
I hadn't envisioned that when I wrote the base note. Obviously anyone
who doesn't turn off the engine when picking up a skier ought not to
be driving a boat. We all try to be extremely safety concious. I was
thinking about an extra saftey precaution for situations that may be
beyond our control (one serious injury that I am aware of occurred when
a boat was forced to turn suddenly, a man was thrown out and hit by the
prop).
I agree with .9 that there are some situations where prop guards can
and should be used.
Denise
|
592.11 | Power-less to manouver.... | ULTRA::BURGESS | I don't DO big wakes | Wed Jan 24 1990 13:17 | 12 |
| re <<< Note 592.10 by CVG::CARR >>>
> I hadn't envisioned that when I wrote the base note. Obviously anyone
> who doesn't turn off the engine when picking up a skier ought not to
> be driving a boat. We all try to be extremely safety concious. I was
Oooooo_eeeeiiiii ! Tell 'em !
R {still not good at swinging the stern (and its
swim/boarding platform) around to the skier with the
engine off}
|
592.12 | We *NEED* prop guards | DONVAN::DECAROLIS | Jeanne | Wed Jan 24 1990 13:22 | 27 |
|
Re:-1
Not too long ago a fellow was thrown out of his boat and
run over (Boston Whaler)......if there was a prop
guard on the boat he would have both legs today.
I've found that a lot of tournament boat owners have that
awful habit of leaving the boat running (in neutral) while
the skier boards the platform.
There isn't a whole lot of danger in doing this because
of where the propellor is situated, right?! Most boats
have the propellor/s directly at the stern, while the
tournament boats have the prop sort of under the
middle of the boat or slightly back from center.
I read too many Stephen King novels so I prefer the engine
shut off....no matter what the boat. :>) Right Doug,
those fumes are yucko!
These prop guards sound like a great thing, let's hope
they can design something in the future that will work
on every boat.
jd/
|
592.13 | May be the price we pay, willingly ?? | ULTRA::BURGESS | I don't DO big wakes | Wed Jan 24 1990 14:01 | 29 |
| re <<< Note 592.12 by DONVAN::DECAROLIS "Jeanne" >>>
> -< We *NEED* prop guards >-
> There isn't a whole lot of danger in doing this because
> of where the propellor is situated, right?! Most boats
> have the propellor/s directly at the stern, while the
> tournament boats have the prop sort of under the
> middle of the boat or slightly back from center.
Yes, its not "STICKING RIGHT OUT THERE" the way it is with
an I/O or an out board - an outboard also gives a swimmer or skier a
clearer idea of where the prop is than an I/O does, so it might be
easier for the swimmer/skier to avoid despite the driver's problem.
There's still no excuse for the driver's problem, responsible for the
safety of the ship and all who whatever in her, etc.
An I/O can be almost anywhere from the swimmer's viewpoint, especially
if it has been tilted up a bit for shallow water, and of course the
biggest part of the out-jutting is under water. UGLY ! Also, some
I/Os can pop into gear, if the cable adjustment is marginal, as the
unit is tilted up. UGLIER !
I havn't seen any prop guard designs, but imagine them to be
either full cages like weed guards on trolling motors, or a few fairly
thick bars running beside and under the prop - ending 6 or 8 inches
behind the prop. I'm sure low drag guards could be designed;
cheap, strong, low drag - pick any two.
R
|
592.14 | Skier down flags. | ELMAGO::RCURTIS | Footer | Thu Jan 25 1990 20:08 | 7 |
|
Re: Orange/Red flags
Skier down flags are mandatory here in New Mexico.
Rob
|
592.15 | Skier down flags | NWD002::OBRIENKE | | Wed Feb 07 1990 19:16 | 2 |
| Skier down flags are common in Washington State. Not sure if required.
|