T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
568.1 | Nissan is as good as Yamaha | SSVAX::REDFIELD | | Thu Dec 14 1989 07:30 | 14 |
| >
> Nissan is available mailorder and locally for what appear to be
> good prices but I've never seen one on a boat. Any experiences
> with Nissan ?
>
I think you'd find that Nissan is comparable to Yamaha from a
quality/reliability standpoint. Pricing is about 10-15% less.
These is a Nissan dealer that will do good service on the Cape (across the
Bourne Bridge right in Rt28...forgot the name - might be Cape Cod Nissan.
Pricing is comparable to mail order and you get good service.
Carl
|
568.2 | Sputt, Sputt! | PACKER::GIBSON | DTN225-5193 | Thu Dec 14 1989 08:52 | 30 |
|
Rick I find it interesting that you like Yamaha and Mercs but dont like
Mariners, As a Mariner enigne is a plit product line of Yamaha's for
smaller engines and Mercs for the larger engines. They mix and match
different sizes for different years. It seams that your little 2.2
merc is also really a Yamaha in Merc discuise. Boy are they sneaky!!
I was a Mariner Dealer before I decided to sell out and get back into
electronics.
The other "Off Brand" you speak of, "Force" is the old Crysler line
that was sold off when Lee Iacocca took over.( No Profit in and old
design like that) They have Purty Colours but real ancient engineering.
Another Off Brand is the ESKA (Can you say Sears &
Robuck?Gamefisher) Brand that went chapter 11 in 1988. I picked up a
brand new 15 Hp for well under $1,000. for my rubber dingy. Sears &
Monky Ward now carry Crys/Force Engines.
A newcomer is the Travler Engine company. Fully that they just happen
to have the same designs as Eska had, Just coincidence I guess??
Basicly which ever engine you buy, unless it was designed for a
sailboat, you will need to change the prop to a high thrust prop.
You may want to look into a Seagull? I think that Fred Darrow (Noter)
has one for sale?
Walt
|
568.3 | | DNEAST::OKERHOLM_PAU | | Thu Dec 14 1989 11:58 | 24 |
| <Here we go again>
This has been discussed on a few other occasions and if you peruse
the directory you'll find them.
The perception of quality, reliability etc. has two schools of
thought. One school is that only Japanese anything is any good and all
US stuff is junk. The other, which I am a member of, is that in the case
of outboards the quality, reliabilty etc. of US models is on a par with
the Japanese. A possible exception to this is the Force engine which I
must admit I have a predjudice against.
I've owned Mercs, Mariners (one of which was a Merc and the other a
Yamaha), Evenrudes and a Chrysler. The only one that I felt was cheaply
designed was the Chrysler.
Now I'm not saying that "BUY US " is the only way to go. The
Japanese are great inovators in the product features space and they tend
to come out with new wrinkles faster than US companies. This often
results in a particular model having a head start on some new
inovation. I don't think that this is of particular importance in your
application though....Hmm I wonder when they will come out with the first
2 stroke diesel outboard. :^)
In the areas of quality and reliability I'd compare them as equal and
go for the features and price warranted by the application.
A now a word or two from the worthy opposition.
Paul
|
568.4 | | PACKER::GIBSON | DTN225-5193 | Thu Dec 14 1989 12:29 | 21 |
| Hey Paul
Wonder no longer? I did not mention it due to the rarity of the beast,
but West Germany does have a small 2 cycle outboard DEISEL. It has been
available for a few years and are being imported on the west coast of
USA in Seattle. I forget the importers name, but If someone simply
must have it.... Look it up in a Thomas Register.
Also some Good ole' boy is making an electric outboard 15 hp down in
dixie somewhere. About twice a year I get some promo trying to get me
to handle his sales in the N.E. area. I usually just chuck them. Priced
Way outof line for this market. Look like an Edsiel (sp) or Studeabaker
to me.
Personally, If I had a sailboat? I would not have an Iron horse unless
it was an Inboard Desiel. But what can you expect from a guy that wants
a Standard Stick shift in a Pick um up truck?
Walt
|
568.5 | cost matters | MSCSSE::BERENS | the Moderator | Thu Dec 14 1989 12:42 | 12 |
| re .4:
>>> Personally, If I had a sailboat? I would not have an Iron horse unless
>>> it was an Inboard Desiel. But what can you expect from a guy that wants
>>> a Standard Stick shift in a Pick um up truck?
You must be assuming money is no object. The cost of buying and installing
a small inboard diesel is several times (several thousand dollars) that of
a small outboard engine.
:-)
|
568.6 | Yamaha and Honda | GUIDUK::RADKE | | Wed Dec 27 1989 14:01 | 12 |
| Several years ago Practical Sailor had an article on outboards for
sailboats. One of the key issues as I recall was the amount of thrust
in forward and reverse. Some of the engines tested did poorly in
reverse although there were add-on kits which would help.
Here in Seattle Honda and Yamaha seem to have captured most of the
market for small sailboat outboards. The Yamaha seems to be better
designed for the sailboat market with a larger, slower turning prop.
Unfortunatly Yamaha tends to be expensive, however if I were in a
similar situation I would spring for it.
Howard
|
568.7 | The deisels are coming...the deisels are coming | DNEAST::OKERHOLM_PAU | | Tue Jan 02 1990 11:41 | 15 |
| Re -1>
Regarding Honda, one unique feature of their engines is that they
are all 4 stroke cycle vs 2 stroke. This means no messing with oil/gas
mixture but also means more weight per horsepower and less desirable
torque characterisitcs.
Re several back>
I saw an interesting article in National Fisherman comparing deisel
outboards for commercial applications... and I thought I was joking.
Apparently there are offerings from a couple Italian manufacturers as
well as a British firm and of course Yanmar.
The most surprising thing to me was that they are all 4 stoke cycle
engines. They are probably very reliable but I don't think I'm ready to
turn in my 200hp gas guzzler yet.
|
568.8 | | SMAUG::LINDQUIST | | Mon Jan 22 1990 21:29 | 16 |
| �� The most surprising thing to me was that they are all 4 stoke cycle
�� engines. They are probably very reliable but I don't think I'm ready to
�� turn in my 200hp gas guzzler yet.
A two-stroke diesel would require a blower. In addition to
the extra cost, I would think the physical size of a blower
would make the engine cowl enormous.
There is a piece in this month's BOATING (I think) about a
boat powered by twin Yanmar 27hp diesel outboards. The
article makes it sound like they are production engines.
I'm going to try and get more information next month in
Miami.
- Lee
|
568.9 | ??? | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Jan 22 1990 22:57 | 6 |
| re .8:
Huh? Why does a two-stroke diesel require a blower? Two-stroke spark-
ignition engines don't. Or do you mean a blower for cooling? Shouldn't need
that either (that's one reason water was invented).
|
568.10 | | DNEAST::OKERHOLM_PAU | | Tue Jan 23 1990 07:56 | 14 |
| re .9>
Might I jump in again...since I'm cramming for my USPS Engine
Mainenance course exam. Two stroke deisels need a blower because they
have no separate intake stroke and of course no carburator. An air pump
injects the air at low pressure at the bottom of the power stroke.
Other than the air pump requirement, deisels lend themselves to 2
stoke very well. Because the fuel is injected at precisely the right
time for combustion and because the air pump clears out all the spent
gases, no fuel is wasted. A two stoke gas engine wastes fuel while
clearing out the spent gases.
Regards,
Paul Thanks_for_the_help_with_my_studies
|
568.11 | | SMAUG::LINDQUIST | | Tue Jan 23 1990 10:57 | 16 |
| ��Huh? Why does a two-stroke diesel require a blower? Two-stroke spark-
��ignition engines don't. Or do you mean a blower for cooling? Shouldn't need
��that either (that's one reason water was invented).
Sorry I wasn't clear -- a two-stroke-cycle diesel
conventionally needs a low pressure input blower to scavenge
the cylinder of combustion gases. At the end of the power
stroke, both intake an exhaust valves open and the cylinder
is scavenged by the blower. This is the method employed
by most GM 2-stroke diesels.
A two-stroke-cycle gasoline engine has the same need for
combustion gases to be scavenged. In the gas engine, this
is done by using the 'crankcase' side of the pistons as an
air pump.
- Lee
|
568.12 | ESKA again | JLGVS::GUNNERSON | You got what you wanted and lost what you had | Thu Jul 11 1991 16:19 | 19 |
| Re. "Another Off Brand is the ESKA (Can you say Sears &
Robuck?Gamefisher) Brand that went chapter 11 in 1988."
Does anyone know any place to get parts for these? I am thinking about buying an
inflatable for going to and from shore rather than trying to fight the crowds,
wind, waves, tide, and current all the time. I don't really need the motor, but
an ESKA 3.0 (Cubic inches, not Hp) is included in the sale price. (Used stuff,
private sale, amount seems right for boat alone)
I am confused because the above seems to imply it is a Sears brand. But is so,
Sears didn't go chapter 11 in 1988. If it is another brand, what has Sears got
to do with it? The previous owner gave me the name of a "dealer" in R.I., but
that is kind of far away for me.
The parts I'd be seeking are a throttle cable (or throttle cable/grip assembly)
and the kill switch.
john
|
568.13 | local boat dealers? | MR4DEC::DCADMUS | | Thu Jul 18 1991 12:47 | 16 |
|
The throlle cables are usually pretty standard stuff and most
replacements are avasilable from Morse Contrls- any decent boat dealer
or supply shop should be able to handle them. The kill switch (is it
the one on the throttle that kills the engine when you thriottle down
to stop?) is probbably a standard part. If it's on the engine- check if
the local tecumseh dealer has one- the ESKA engine itself was made by
Tecumseh . IF the switch is in the remote control- check with your
local boat shop.
BTW:- the Sears gamefisher motors were made by ESKA, at least
the small air cooled ones were. ESKA is the co. that went chapter 11
Dick
|
568.14 | Ok, it sounded like Sears motors were being branded "ESKA" , and that didn't sound right | JLGVS::GUNNERSON | You got what you wanted and lost what you had | Thu Jul 18 1991 14:34 | 8 |
| The kill switch is a button on the end of the tiller/handle/throttle.
It sounds as if I could match up the models I might be able to order the parts
from Sears (assuming that Sears still has access to the parts itself).
Thanks,
john
|
568.15 | | MR4DEC::DCADMUS | | Thu Jul 18 1991 15:13 | 14 |
| Having been messing with boats and motors for better than 30 years,
here's what I would do:
1. Take the cable to Boat/US or Bliss or a similar "ship's store".
you should be able to get a match-up or a replacement
2. take the switch out and go to the same place- they also have
waterproof pushbuttons and switches- and match one up that will fit
All the kill switch does is short out the points to ground- any
Single pole, Single throw, normally opne pushbutton or switch should
work.-Johnson and Evenrude used choke, (they had electric chokes)kill, and start pushbuttons like
that for years.
|
568.16 | How about a Suzuki | MILPND::ADAMS | | Tue Aug 13 1991 19:51 | 18 |
|
I have been looking at a 2hp Suzuki engine for my 14ft daysailor.
They want $499 for a new one.
Does anyone have any experience with Suzukis (large or small)?
I have (had) a Johnson 2.5 1987 that destroyed the lower end and
no sooner had I replaced $200 worth of gears and washers, it seized
up for some reason? The engine has less that 15 hours time on it
but was over the 2yr guarantee period by about 6 months. oh well.
Now I am looking again.
Bob
|
568.17 | Evinrude here | GEMVAX::HICKSCOURANT | | Tue Aug 13 1991 20:16 | 4 |
| I have a 3hp Evinrude on the back of my inflatable. Less than $500 at
list price. I am very pleased with it. More data available if you like.
John H-C
|
568.18 | | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Wed Aug 14 1991 10:04 | 5 |
| Best prices I've seen for Nissan (Tohatsu) were less than $500 for a
2.5 and around $550 for a 3.5. This sounds a bit cheaper than the
Suzuki prices and my own experience as well as what I've heard has been
nothing but positive. I think in general the Japanese small motors
are excellent.
|
568.19 | Low HP motors all Japanese Mfg? | MR4DEC::DCADMUS | | Wed Aug 14 1991 11:35 | 6 |
|
Look real hard at the Johnson/Evinrude motors in the samll Hp ranges-
I belive you will find most of them are also Japanese motors- there
iare some comments in one of the many notes in here about what Japanese
manufacturers make waht size motors for the "american" brands.
|
568.20 | Not ALL of them | GEMVAX::HICKSCOURANT | | Wed Aug 14 1991 14:45 | 11 |
| My 3hp Evinrude is an OMC motor. Johnson sells the same motor for less
money (but they didn't carry it in Johnson in NH where I shopped and
needed the motor that very day---I still paid less than I would have in
MA with the sales tax added).
They also sell a 3hp engine made by Suzuki or Yamaha.
Noise level, the size of the integral gas tank, and the
swivel-for-reverse feature (and the not-made-in-Japan nature of it),
all drew me to that engine as well as the price.
John H-C
|
568.21 | Ma is broke! | KAHALA::SUTER | We dun't need no stinkin' skis, (sometimes) | Wed Aug 14 1991 17:07 | 14 |
|
>My 3hp Evinrude is an OMC motor. Johnson sells the same motor for less
>money (but they didn't carry it in Johnson in NH where I shopped and
>needed the motor that very day---I still paid less than I would have in
>MA with the sales tax added).
John,
Do you mean to say that you didn't mail your Ma sales tax
to the state on the purchase of that motor?
tsk, tsk, tsk......
|
568.22 | 10 hp outboardneeded | OFOSS1::JOHNHC | | Tue Sep 05 1995 17:30 | 9 |
| Looking for a 4-cycle, long-shaft, 9.9 or 10 hp outboard, preferably
made in America by an American company.
Can somebody point me toward a brand and model as well as a marina in
MA or NH that sells that brand and model?
Thanks.
John H-C
|
568.23 | | TRACTR::TOMAS | I hate stiff water | Thu Sep 07 1995 11:02 | 9 |
| John,
Just read in the latest issue of Bassmasters that a number of mfgrs are
coming out with 4-cycle engines, including Mercury/Mariner. Not sure if the
Mercs are available yet, but there's lots of dealers around.
Let us know how you make out.
Joe
|
568.24 | more info | PENUTS::DSULLIVAN | | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:49 | 25 |
|
John Ole Buddy,
How's it going... As -1 says these are fairly new in popularity.
With the EPA imposing new restrictions on outboards etc... the 4 strokes
are exceptional for many reasons:
1) They burn much /much cleaner
2) They are extremely gas efficient
3) They are more powerful
Presently there are very few models 9.9 & 50hps. The bad news is this year
was a limited production (test run to see how they would sell). Alot of the
motors are hard to get. pre-sold
Mercury and Johnson (OMC) do make them from this side of the pond.
Suziki/yamaha/honda/ have all jumped on the early band wagon.
These motors will not replace the 150-300hp class high performance outbaords
They will, however, in the future more than likely be the power plant of
choice for the 14-17 aluminum or lighter weight glass boats.
- Dave
|
568.25 | | HPS126::WILSON | | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:58 | 6 |
| re .22
Saw a 9.9 4 cylce at Whites Marina in Norway Maine a couple of weeks
ago. Good people to deal with, bought my last two boats there.
Don
|
568.26 | Not more powerful | EMMFG::THOMS | | Thu Sep 07 1995 15:14 | 5 |
| The performance figures I've seen in PM magazine show the four strokes
way off the pace in acceleration and in top speed. They do much better
in fuel efficiency and noise level.
Ross
|
568.27 | hmmmm | PENUTS::DSULLIVAN | | Thu Sep 07 1995 17:23 | 7 |
|
I thought what I've been reading is pound for pound inch for inch they
will out perform the 2 strokes in the same class
I could be wrong --- I was wrong once....
- Dave
|
568.28 | Wrong again Davey! | SUBPAC::CRONIN | | Fri Sep 08 1995 09:45 | 11 |
|
There are presently 4 stroke outboards up to 90hp and they
expect up to 125hp next year. Weight to HP they're about the
same as a 2 stroke, I -think- the 4 strokes have more torque
though.
Every major manufacturer should have 4 strokes in the smaller
sizes. So far only Honda has large ones. They're pretty neat
too. They're basically a Civic 4 cyl. with 4 carburetors.
B.C.
|
568.29 | Not my experience | ASABET::MCWILLIAMS | | Fri Sep 08 1995 13:43 | 7 |
| To provide one datapoint, I just bought a new 9.9HP Sailorized OMC
engine this spring. It's weight was 72lbs. The equivalent Honda 9.9
HP in a long shaft version (not the longer sail version) was 87 lbs.
At least on the low end, the power to weight ratio is not the same.
/jim
|
568.30 | Uncle BC | PENUTS::DSULLIVAN | | Fri Sep 08 1995 15:32 | 22 |
|
BC> read -1 SEE THEY ARE LIGHTER! They DO have more torque. Let's see???
Lighter /more torque... that translates to more performance and I thought
you were brighter than the average bulb...
They are environmentally better cause of clean burning.
One thing that won't change:
You'd have to pry my 200+HP Envinrude out me just after you closed the casket.
I enjoy the cloud of oil smoke my 200+ Envinrude expues in the morning. It
kind of makes me feel one with the motor. Admittingly I'm not as
environmentally 90's as our friend John but, I do my part. So my vice is
firing up the bigone and blowing down a lake a 70+mph. At least I don't
toss my cans/fishing matter/batteries/rods or other polluntants overboard.
Plus, if more people switch to the 4 strokes then my 2 stroke spue won't
matter much.
Doesn't make me a bad person/ just a fast one!
_ Sully
|
568.31 | Dear Nephew Woody... | SUBPAC::CRONIN | | Mon Sep 11 1995 08:52 | 6 |
| I most definitely enjoy sharing an occasional trip down the
lake with you! But just think... Wouldn't it be nice to have
all that horsepower -and- more torque??? After all, your holeshot
-could- be a little better!!! 8^)
B.C.
|
568.32 | Almost forgot... | SUBPAC::CRONIN | | Mon Sep 11 1995 08:54 | 5 |
|
Getting back to John's original question, well almost...
I think I remember seeing a couple year old Honda 15hp for
sale in the Fisherman this week...
B.C.
|
568.33 | I found one, and it scared me away. | LEXSS1::JOHNHC | | Mon Sep 11 1995 15:57 | 13 |
| I found a 4-cycle 9.9 long shaft Mercury this weekend: $1,995. OUCH!
I think it's the only one in the Lakes Region of NH. So far, I haven't
screwed up the courage to tell my wife I need to spend two grand for a
motor that I will use only twice a year before the mast is up and after
it's down (i.e., put in and take out).
I was prepared to plunk down as much as $900 on the spot, but more than
twice that amount has given me pause.
I'm hoping I can find an OMC version for less.....
John H-C
|
568.34 | Was it new ? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Mon Sep 11 1995 17:51 | 6 |
| re:price
I haven't priced any recently, but isn't a 9.9hp 2-stroke in the
vicinity of about $1500 new ?
Ray
|
568.35 | Yeah, as am I, too, I guess. | LEXSS1::JOHNHC | | Tue Sep 12 1995 11:28 | 8 |
| Yes, it was a new one. Thing is, the 2-stroke on the back of the
sailboat now was purchased for $300 used, and I bought a new 3hp
2-stroke a couple years ago for $350. I just assumed that I could get
one for considerably less than $2,000.
Just my innocence in the world of combustion engines, I guess.
John H-C
|
568.36 | price... | PENUTS::DSULLIVAN | | Tue Sep 12 1995 11:50 | 10 |
|
There are NO bargains in the 4 cycle world.
John, for twice a year you could use that 60mph duck-tape to attach
a dive tanks to the side. OPen valves and steer away!
Other than that, FORCE aka the Force-O-matic is the best price in the
indusrty.
- Sully
|
568.37 | price... | PENUTS::DSULLIVAN | | Tue Sep 12 1995 11:50 | 10 |
|
There are NO bargains in the 4 cycle world.
John, for twice a year you could use that 60mph duck-tape to attach
a dive tanks to the side. OPen valves and steer away!
Other than that, FORCE aka the Force-O-matic is the best price in the
indusrty.
- Sully
|
568.38 | | ASABET::MCWILLIAMS | | Tue Sep 12 1995 14:01 | 11 |
| Re: 568.30
The OMC (2 stroke) is 72 lbs and hence lighter. The Honda (4 stroke) is
87 lbs and hence heavier.
I picked up a new Johnson (OMC) 9.9 sailorized version (that means 3
blade prop instead of 2, super long 25" shaft, and exhaust port above
the anti-cavitation plate) at the Feb 95 boat show for $1895.
/jim
|
568.39 | 2 or 4 cycle | BIGQ::SORRELLS | Hell has my E-Mail address | Fri Oct 06 1995 18:00 | 8 |
| Is something like a Mercury 50hp available in both 2- and 4-cycle?
If so, which would you buy? I can get the performance specs but I'm
also looking at reliability and cost (or actually value for the
dollar) - what are your thoughts in these areas?
thanks,
Dave
|
568.40 | value | PENUTS::DSULLIVAN | | Tue Oct 10 1995 12:30 | 11 |
|
Dave,
As stated earlier, value and 4 strokes is presently a penguin.
If your looking for a new 50hp cheap, can;t beat the FORCE aka
Force-O-Matic for value and reliability.
2 strokes are cheaper....
- Dave Sullivan
|
568.41 | Kept the old one and invested in repairs | LEXSS1::JOHNHC | | Thu Oct 19 1995 16:21 | 12 |
| Well, I stopped by with my credit card ready to put a $2,000 hole in my
credit. After all, it turned out, a 4-cycle 9.9 long shaft isn't
substantially more than a 2-cycle 9.9 long shaft ( <$125 difference
between the two). The thing that prevented me from buying it was the
size of the motor. It was simply too LARGE for me to place on the back
of the boat while standing in the rowboat.
So I ended up taking the old 9.9 in for repairs, where it sits now. In
the end, the rebuild shouldn't cost more than $500, which is still
$1,500 cheaper than a new outboard.
John H-C
|