T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
545.1 | Post in sailing too. | JUPITR::KTISTAKIS | Mike K. | Fri Oct 20 1989 15:58 | 6 |
| This note does not imply that they are not people in the Powerboats
notes to help you with your base note question.However, as a matter of
fact there are a couple of people in the sailing notes(honest! I don't
try to get customers from this file to the other) that they built and
restore their own boats.So, I suggest that you post your note there
too.
|
545.2 | Finishing Answers for Wood | SSGVAX::REDFIELD | | Sat Oct 21 1989 18:36 | 20 |
| Re: .0
I had a similar challenge last spring. All I had to do was finish a new
wooden 8' pram, so the work level was not as much as your requirement.
I searched the notesfile (power and sail). Asked questions etc.
What turned into the best approach was to call the 800 numbers for Petite
and Interlux, two very reputable marine paint/finishing manufacturers.
Both customer assistance centers were very helpful. They made suggestions
only after you respond to their questions so to permit the solution to be
"tailored" to your needs.
numbers 800-INTRLUX
201 625-3100 (can't find the 800 #)
Good luck and don't forget to post their "solutions"
Carl
|
545.3 | Just add sandpaper and sweat | STAR::KENNEY | | Sun Oct 22 1989 17:06 | 6 |
| Also check out the book Fine Yacht Finishes for wood and fiberglass.
That is not the exact title but is close enough to find it. I believe
that it is under $30 from Boat US.
Forrest
|
545.4 | No big deal | WJOUSM::SCHLEGEL | | Tue Oct 24 1989 17:03 | 4 |
| I worked on 32 foot Chris's for about ten years (my own, not as a
business). What exactly do you want to know? What condition is it,
etc?
|
545.5 | REPLY TO NO BIG DEAL | DELMAR::NEWELL_DO | | Tue Oct 24 1989 19:29 | 17 |
| FIRST LET ME DESCRIBE THE BOAT'S CONDITION:
IT WAS SANDED AND PRIMED ABOUT ONE YEAR AGO . SINCE THEN IT HAS
JUST BEEN SITTING.
MY QUESTIONS ARE; A.HOW MUCH DO I HAVE TO SAND THE OLD PRIME COAT?
WHAT GRIT PAPER SHOULD I USE.
B.I HAVE A 4HP AIR COMPRESSOR AND A COMMERCIAL
GRADE AIRLESS SPRAYER. WHICH WOULD BE BEST FOR
THE PRIME AND FINISH COAT.
C.DO I NEED TO DO ANY THING TO THE PRIME COAT
BEFORE I APPLY THE FINISH.
|
545.6 | | WJOUSM::SCHLEGEL | | Wed Oct 25 1989 16:35 | 17 |
| You are out of my league. I did all by hand (with assistance of belt
and/or vibration sanders. For regular hand painting, should not need to
work on the prime except to fair or smooth the surface.
I am not familiar with airless sprayers. The air compressor and
appropriate spray gun should give an excellent finish, though. With
the equipment you have, if you did not have oil primer, possibly you
might have considered Awlgrip or equivalents.
In answer to your specific quewstion as to what grit to use on the
primer, it must be known what you are attempting to do next. As I
mentioned, sanding might not even be necessary. If you wanted to take
off any remaining roughness,you might start around 120 or 220 grit.
How smooth is it now, and smooth do you want to get? What color are
you planning on to finish with?
Niles
|
545.7 | don't ignore the hazards | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Oct 25 1989 17:46 | 11 |
| re .5:
Before you spray ANYTHING, check with the manufacturer regarding toxicity.
Sprayed polyurethanes (eg, Awlgrip) are extremely hazardous and can easily
kill you. The proper protective equipment (which includes a positive pressure
respirator) is essential. Some vendors are much more conscientious about
health hazard warnings than others (the makers of Awlgrip really emphasize the
health dangers of their products). By the way, if you don't mind a bit of
orange peel, polyurethanes (especially white) can be quite satisfactorily
applied with a high quality foam roller.
|
545.8 | Airless or Air, both will work. | ATSE::URBAN | | Wed Oct 25 1989 22:57 | 11 |
|
If you have both a air and airless sprayer I'd opt for the air driven.
I have used an airless sprayer with catalyzed auto enamel and Awlgrip
with excellent results but the air driven sprayer does a better more
consistent job and is less 'touchy' when in use.
Follow reccommnedations, esp. regarding volitility of fumes and proper
self protection.
Tom
|
545.9 | I need a boat fixed | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Wed Jun 20 1990 14:54 | 13 |
|
I hope this is the right place to put this. If not, please let me know.
My wife and I were given an OOOOOOOOOOLD wooden boat. It was built by
my wifes uncle ex-father-inlaw (say that 5 times real fast) back in
1929. It's based after a Peterborough design (what ever that is). We
just stripped the boat only to find a lot of rot. We'd like to keep the
boat since is holds some sentimantal value in my wifes family. So does
anyone know of place in the NH Mass area that can fix a boat like
this?? I've looked in the NH phone books but noone seems to work on
wooden boats.
Mike
|
545.10 | where is the rot??? | HYEND::J_BORZUMATO | | Wed Jun 20 1990 16:11 | 14 |
| You didn't mention the boats size. But all things being
relative, these kind of repairs can get expensive, very expensive.
Reason being, that each piece, needs to be fit into place.
On a percentage basis, how much rot, and where is it..
If its in the stringers, or major support areas, were really
talking big $$$$$$.
Sorry for the bad news, but at times, it ain't worth it.
JIm
|
545.11 | Sentiment vs $$? Sentiment wins! | ARCHER::SUTER | Sunny and 80! | Wed Jun 20 1990 16:38 | 10 |
|
There are places which work on wooden boats..... One
that comes to mind is located on Winnie between Gilford and
Meredith. I realize that doesn't narrow it down much, but
it's on the right heading north along the lake and he has
all kinds of wooden boats out front.
Anyone happen to know the name of this place?
Rick
|
545.12 | | TOTH::WHYNOT | | Wed Jun 20 1990 16:47 | 7 |
| Rick,
According to my trusty (slightly outdated) yellow pages, could it be
Harper's boat restoration on Rt 3 in Meredith? (603-279-8841) There's
another listing also -Wolfboro Restoration Center (603-569-1869).
I haven't dealt with either place so no 1st hand experience...
Good luck with your decisions,
Doug
|
545.13 | see WOODENBOAT | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Jun 20 1990 19:01 | 3 |
| See any issue of WOODENBOAT magazine for many, many advertisements by
wooden boat builders/repairers/restorers. Any work is like to be very,
very expensive.
|
545.14 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Thu Jun 21 1990 10:30 | 17 |
|
Thanks for all the replys and thanks to some of you who sent me mail.
To answer some of the questions about the boat.
. The boat is about 15'. Not exactly sure.
. There is rot in some of the ribs and about 30% of the haul. Also the
transom (? on spelling) has some rot.
. I can do all the painting and refinishing myself. Over half our house
is furnished that way. It's the replacing the boards and ribs that I
have no idea about.
I'll post my what I find out here. I just wish my wifes family kept better
care of the boat.
Mike
|
545.15 | RE: .9 wooden boat repair | CVG::MULLIN | cvg::cvg_ad | Thu Jun 21 1990 13:27 | 3 |
| There is the Wooden Boat Shop in Melvin Village on Lake Winni north of
Wolfboro on Rt 109. It's run by Ivan Phelps. He does repairs and
restorations.
|
545.16 | Slick Seam vs Silicone | GOLF::WILSON | | Mon Mar 18 1991 09:07 | 31 |
| Moved by moderator...
================================================================================
Note 812.0 SLICK SEAM vs SILICONE No replies
BOSOX::MFLAHERTY 26 lines 17-MAR-1991 21:26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
I'm new to the wooden boat world and I was wondering if some
one could help me out.
I'm kind of torn between useing the "SLICK SEAM" brand sealant
or the old standby silicone for the seams on my '67 28ft Pacemaker.
I've heard incredible things about slick seam which has been
on the market for a little while now. My cousin swears by it.
The boat is in remarkable condition for its age and doesn't
really need anything that any other wooden boat would.
The guy that I bought the boat from said he's been using the
silicone on it for all of the 14 years that he's owned it and he's
never had a real problem with it.
Has anyone out there had any experience whith both?
Any response will be apreciated,
Mackrel Mike
|
545.17 | a little lesson in bott. paint.. | CSLALL::BORZUMATO | | Thu Jan 30 1992 13:54 | 32 |
|
I tried something new for me last year. After bitchin for a lot
of years about barnacles on inboard shafts/props/ or
better stated, the running gear, i decided to try a spray on
Anti-foulant made by Tempo.
I sprayed the shafts and the props. Remeber to mask off the areas
where you put your zincs, they won't work otherwise.
You need to apply 3 coats.
In the fall i had 3 barnacles on them (this is twin inboards)
This year i'm gonna do all the running gear.
ONE CAUTION, do not get this in your eyes..... WE"RE talking
instant BLINDNESS. So wear the proper safety gear.
I recommend spraying downwind.
I'm sure the folks with i/o's do this because of the aluminum
housings.
I'm also gonna do the trim tabs. I put them on several yrs. ago.
I followed the mfgrs. directions and wasted a lot of time
applying epoxy paint and then the antifouling paint.
Since most of it peeled off anyway, i'll finish it off
and put the spray stuff on.
Oh, the spray stuff isn't cheap, but it works....
JIm
|
545.18 | Good stuff | LEVERS::SWEET | | Fri Jan 31 1992 12:17 | 5 |
| I used the spray stuff on my lower unit last year for the first
time a was real please with the results. Definitly worth the $20
for paint and primer.
Bruce
|
545.19 | Tin Based paint is the Best | MR4DEC::DCADMUS | happiness is a bigger boat | Fri Jan 31 1992 16:54 | 14 |
|
I think it all depend on your location. I moor my boat in Bristol
harbor in R.I. The spray stuff wa sput on (3 coats) in 30 days I had
grass and barnacles you wouldn't beleive.
I finally ended up getting some tin based bottom paint for the I/O
(yes, the realstuff). The Marina wanted over $100 to put it onm my I/O
That stuff workd great- only problem is , it is red.
I now have an ugly(but Clean) outdrive.
Dick
|
545.20 | no, no, no.... | CSLALL::BORZUMATO | | Mon Feb 03 1992 08:12 | 4 |
|
I wouldn't advertise this...
JIm
|
545.21 | | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Mon Feb 03 1992 08:59 | 10 |
| I used the spray-on stuff last Spring. It lasted about 1-2 months
(boat is moored in salt water). It is very expensive, very toxic,
and very time consuming to apply - there are an amazing number of
little areas on the outdrive that you *don't* want to get it near
(water intake, trim cylinders, tilt mechanism) and you have to tape all
these areas.
I just go over the lower unit with a scrubbrush every couple of weeks
and that seems to do just as well for 10 min effort.
|
545.22 | is this possible...??? | CSLALL::BORZUMATO | | Mon Feb 03 1992 09:45 | 20 |
|
Hmmm, unless i take a swim, i can't see the running gear.
I hauled in June, the running gear lost out to the rocks.
Anyway, in the past when i hauled in the fall, the running
gear was loaded with barnacles. Even pressure washing didn't get them
off. This fall, i had 3 barnacles on the gear after pressure
wash.
The spray on is about $15 a can.
The running gear is under the boat and underway is constantly
get the full force of the moving water.
I/O's are kinda half and half, where the knee and some
part are above the keel and out of the water when running.
Wonder if this might be the difference?????
JIm.
|
545.23 | refinishing interior of an old Thompson lapstrake | GNPIKE::HANNAN | Beyond description... | Mon Jun 01 1992 13:13 | 29 |
| I own a 1958 17' Thompson lapstrake wooden boat that needs
some cosmetic work around the interior walls, and I'm wondering
what's the best thing to use to protect the wood once I sand it
down. I also want to keep future peeling of the finish to a minimum.
I removed "plastic" carpeting that came with the boat that covered
the interior walls because I heard it induces rot. There's no
major rot problem. Removing the carpet exposed the the ribs/laps
of wood, and also the reason why the former owner installed it:
to keep maintenance down.
The present condition of the wood walls is solid wood but with
some layers of peeling varnish. It's peeling and flaking like
crazy! A palm sander I borrowed from a friend to test worked
pretty good stripping down the old varnish.
What I'm wondering is, what do I apply once I've stripped all
the old finish off to keep future problems (ie, peeling) to a
mininum ? Any suggestions/comments/hints ?
I guess I have varnish or polyurethane/stain as options.
FWIW, the area under the bow of the boat looks mint: no peeling
whatsoever on what looks like old varnish/stain. So I assume it's
exposure to the sun that caused the rest of the boat's interior
walls to peel.
Thanks,
Ken
|
545.24 | Use a product with UV blockers | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Mon Jun 01 1992 14:14 | 11 |
| I would re-varnish myselfs to keep the original finish although you may
want to go with one of the poly-urethane finishes. Either one should
be available with a UV blocker to minimize the effects of the sun on
the finish. Make sure you read the instructions on what you buy. Some
products require a filler stain first over new or open grain woods
(oak, mahogany, ash) to insure a smooth finish. Most of the major
makers (Interlux, Z-Spar, Epifanes) have a toll free 800 number to help
with your selection. Check also at your local marine supply store.
They should have application charts to assist you.
Wayne (keep it original) Norcross
|
545.25 | swell/shrink crack avoidance (minimization) | HYDRA::BURGESS | Water dependent | Mon Jun 01 1992 14:41 | 11 |
|
Probably already covered in this, or other, strings - -
anyway, be sure to follow the directions and have the wood either
swollen or shrunken, it makes a big difference to some finishes.
If you have the boat out of the water for a few weeks and it is dried
out when you refinish it the finish might crack ("craze" ?) when you
get the wood wet and it swells. I think the normal way is to swell
the wood, but check with the directions.
Reg
|
545.26 | | GNPIKE::HANNAN | Beyond description... | Mon Jun 01 1992 15:07 | 9 |
| Thanks for the tips. So I guess it doesn't matter whether
I use varnish or polyurethane; it's just a matter of looks
(and attitude ;-).
I like the idea of a UV blocker. The sun must be what made it
peel so much. If it was the swelling, the covered bow interior
would also be peeling, and it looks fine.
Ken
|
545.27 | Wet Wood | SALEM::GILMAN | | Tue Jun 02 1992 12:37 | 9 |
| Wood works constantly, swelling and shrinking. How can one apply a
finish which can't expand or shrink with the wood and expect the finish
to stay on? Swollen wood would be wet wood, right? I have never
heard of a finish which was supposed to be applied over wet wood. But,
maybe the word wet is a relative one, since all wood contains SOME
moisture.
Jeff
|
545.28 | swollen/shrunk(en) .ne. wet/dry | HYDRA::BURGESS | Water dependent | Tue Jun 02 1992 13:40 | 10 |
|
I deliberately used the terms swollen and shrunk(en)
Wood can be very swollen, or expanded - but the surface can be quite dry
and suitable for finishing. Similarly, it can be very shrunken, but wet on the
surface and NOT suitable for finishing. I believe that if wood is finished when
swollen (but surface dry) there is less likelyhood of the finish spoiling due
to shrinking and swelling.
Reg
|
545.29 | Paint Performance 101 | DKAS::SPENCER | | Tue Jun 02 1992 13:53 | 33 |
| Generally finishes should be applied to dry wood. Wood wet with fresh or
salt water may pose problems bonding the finish. Additionally, wood wet
with fresh water is likely to dry rot if you seal the moisture in.
There are two swelling/shrinking actions happening here. Finishes in
fact generally are somewhat elastic, and can accommodate normal ranges of
expansion/contraction in wood due to heating/cooling. Water absorption,
however, involves a greater range of size changes, and finishes rarely
handle that well. Especially if they don't adhere well. (See para #1.)
Topside and interior finishes applied to dry (<15% moisture) wood should
prevent water getting into the grain and swelling it. Bottom paint
doesn't stretch to totally cover the swelled grain, but covers it well
enough that in theory the micro-organisms which want to grow there can't
find a spot far enough from the toxic paint for it to make any difference.
One-part finishes are in fact porous when dry. The volatile liquid used
to hold the dissolved and suspended toxic goodies evaporates, leaving
microscopic pinholes and gaps in the material. They usually act a bit
like Gore-Tex -- liquid water molecules can't penetrate, but often gaseous
(independent) molecules can. This isn't necessarily good than bad: as
much trapped moisture stands a chance of leaving as new moisture does of
entering. Wood tends to find its own moisture level, based partial vapor
pressures and other factors.
If you want or need a true total barrier, then two-part systems are
required, such as epoxies. They catalyze into a solid without much
evaporation, thus reducing or even eliminating any porosity. This is why
multiple thin coats of two-part epoxy is the preferred anti-blister
preventative for fiberglass boats, where the goal is to keep any water
molecules from sustained contact with the gelcoat.
Dr. Paint.
|
545.30 | What I've learned (In Maryland) | FASDER::AHERB | Al is the *first* name | Wed Jun 03 1992 22:51 | 19 |
| Going back to my very first boat (wood & a disaster), I recall that the
"experts" learned only to paint one side of wood where possible. The
rationale was that wood needs to breathe or else it would rot. The
moisture then could enter/escape thru the unsealed side of the wood
which would normally be the bilge.
The interior use theory essentually is that you seal completely the
wood (such as a door) while it's dry and after you finished the
trimming in order to keep moisture out and prevent swollen/stuck doors.
In Maryland, where there are plank like wood hulls for work boats, they
use a fiber packing (okum?) while dry between the planks and paint over
it. You can witness a wood boat sitting on land a while and see how
shrinkage of the wood opens gaps as wide as a 1/4". The "pros" simply
let the boat sit in water and reswell to seal again (with new packing
of course).
I don't envy anyone with a wood boat. They do have a beauty of their
own however.
|
545.31 | Oakum | SALEM::GILMAN | | Thu Jun 04 1992 08:43 | 3 |
| I don't think your supposed to paint over oakum.
Jeff
|
545.32 | | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Thu Jun 04 1992 09:28 | 12 |
| There are several good books available that discuss the proper methods
for painting/varnishing wooden boats. Reading one of them would probably
be time well-spent. These and many other good books are available by
mail from International Marine Publishing.
Paint and varnish are both very porous to water and do little to prevent
water absorption. See the various tests by epoxy manufacturers [eg,
Gougeon Brothers (WEST epoxy)]. They mostly prevent surface weathering and
look nice. Even the very best exterior varnish will only survive a year
or less of direct sunlight. The best way to keep it looking nice is to
keep it covered.
|
545.33 | OAkum= Cotton + Pine Tar | MR4DEC::DCADMUS | happiness is a bigger boat | Thu Jun 04 1992 21:56 | 20 |
|
Oakum (saturated with Pine Tar- I beleive it is cotton or hemp) is used
only BELOW the water line. The caulking used above the water line is
raw cotton. THe odl timers used a special caulking iron and caulking
hammer. You can still by Oakum, caulking cotton, and the tools from
Jamestown Supply in R.I.
Having owned several wooden boats, I can attest to the awful job of
caulking (you didn'y do it every year, and the extensive maintenace
on a wooden boat.
But the Beauty, The smell (Paint, Manila,Pine Tar) and most of all the
ride- (wood boats flex- some a great deal)
I still keep a hunk of tarred marline in my shed at my home on the
coast- brings back a lot of memories.
Dick
Oakum=Cotton+ Pine Tar
|
545.34 | stain/wood preservative for interior ? | GNPIKE::HANNAN | Beyond description... | Tue Apr 27 1993 10:11 | 22 |
| I'm thinking of using a stain/wood preservative on the
interior hull and sides of the '58 Thompson that I've
been working on. I figure that the stain will give the
interior, exposed lapstrakes + ribs decent appearance - the
test application looks nice! The wood preservative part
(prevents rot and mildew) would be good for protecting the
wood. Another major advantage to using this as I see it, is
that it won't peel like varnish, though this isn't a problem
under the flooring which I also will be coating.
The product is made by McKloskey and it says 'water resistant'
on the label, as opposed to waterproof, so I assume it will
allow the wood to breathe. It's also non-photochemically
reactive, so good for exposure to the sun. Its typical
application is for exterior decks and that sort of thing.
The boat is trailered.
Any comments on using a stain/wood preservative like this
for this application ?
Thanks
Ken
|
545.35 | Penn Yann canvas replacement | GOLF::WILSON | Think Spring! | Tue Apr 27 1993 13:53 | 22 |
| I've just been offered a deal on a 12' Penn Yann Cartopper
that's just too good to pass up ($100). The boat is all
there in one piece, with all hardware, and no rot. This
one is contructed of a rib and plank design, then covered
with stretched canvas.
The major piece of work that it needs, is to replace all of
the canvas. Any of you know anything about replacing the
canvas? I recently attended a wooden boat symposium at
the Mariner's Museum in VA, where there was a presentation
on Penn Yanns. From that I know that the canvas was originally
installed with the use of large machines that stretched the
canvas with hundreds of pounds of pressure. I'm not that
strong though. 8^)
Anyone know of the recommended procedure for replacing the
canvas, correct materials, etc.? I'm planning on checking out
the procedure for staying original, and also West System epoxy
(I'd like to only have to do it once!).
thanks,
Rick
|
545.36 | We bought canvas in Auburn | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Tue Apr 27 1993 14:21 | 11 |
| Rick, while in college, my friend and I recovered a canvas canoe. We
bought the canvas at Johnson Tarpaulin on Rt. 20 outside of Worcester.
I have no idea if they are still there. They knew what we needed. We
stretched the canvas over the canoe frame as tight as we could and
stapled it. (make sure you use stainless staples.) The sealant causes
the canvas to shrink so that it really tightens up. I don't remember
where we purchased the sealant or what it was called. We applied many
light coats with a paint brush. I'm sure our restoration job would
make purists cry put it came out looking pretty good and it didn't
leak.
Wayne
|