T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
455.1 | Hope this helps.... | 56504::SWEET | Capt. Codfish...GW Fishing Team | Mon Jul 31 1989 12:20 | 9 |
| I have an apelco 6100 which is basically the same as the 570. There
is a PCB in the base of the antenna that has the coax attached at
one end and the antenna coupler at the other. I would imagine this
board has gone bad. It is easy to remove by unscewing the base of
the coupler and disconecting the coax connection. Check you manaul
to see if they have a part number for this board and if so you can
order it and replace it yourself.
Bruce
|
455.2 | A LORAN DISEASE? | LESNET::SCIACCA | | Wed Aug 02 1989 14:08 | 6 |
| Last Saturday morning I found my Loran was blind, as well. It acts
like it did a couple of years ago, when the problem turned out to
be a short in the antenna coupler (the PCB in the base of the antenna).
Your reference to the storm is interesting- I wonder if there could
have been some lightning damage?
TOM
|
455.3 | Similar Problem | SSGVAX::REDFIELD | | Sun Aug 06 1989 12:02 | 9 |
| Interesting!
Same thing happened to me a couple of days ago. I turned the loran ( I
have the RayNav 570) off/on a couple of times and its been ok since.
It's still under warranty...I'll check this out with Raytheon. they have a
pretty good customer service department in Hudson, NH.
Carl
|
455.4 | active antennas... | REMEDY::KOPEC | now I try to be amused | Mon Aug 07 1989 09:03 | 4 |
| Loran antennas often have a preamp in the antenna base; this may
have gotten zapped ...
...tom
|
455.5 | LORAN Chain Outage? | HDLITE::CREASER | Auxiliary Coxswain | Mon Aug 07 1989 10:24 | 6 |
| Has anyone checked the "Local Notice to Mariners" lately? I can't be sure, but
I seem to recall that there was a service outage scheduled around this time.
Before you tear your system apart check with a boating neighbor to see if they
are able track the chain.
Jerry
|
455.6 | may nto be your loran... | TYCOBB::J_BORZUMATO | | Tue Aug 22 1989 15:12 | 9 |
| your problems may not be with the unit, regardless of the brand
you own. the navy has a transmitter in norfolk virginia, which
is emmitting a signal which destroys your loran and its ability
to perform. you can avoid this problem by having a filter installed
(about $150). there is an 800 number to call if anyone wants it
i will respond to this note again.
JIM.
|
455.7 | What was the Fault? | HAZEL::YELINEK | WITHIN 10 | Tue Aug 22 1989 15:57 | 14 |
| Re: .0 CECV03::FEINEN (RICH)
.2 LESNET::SCIACCA (TOM)
.3 SSGVAX::REDFIELD (CARL)
Rich,Tom, & Carl......What was the general (or specific) consensus
around the problems you all experienced with your loran units?
I (we noters) assume your troubles have been overcome but how 'bout
a recap. What did you guys find? Jim's last note was scary,...If
this is truly the case I would think the Loran manufacturers would
put pressure on the Navy (@#$@!!^&?) to avoid such a transmission
or incorporate the filter in the design of their unit. ? .
/MArk (Raynav 570 owner)
|
455.8 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Aug 23 1989 17:09 | 15 |
| re .6:
I rather strongly doubt that the Norfolk Navy transmitter could electrically
damage a loran (unless it were very, very close to the Navy transmitter).
Rather, it is my understanding at the Navy transmitters (there are other than
the one in Norfolk -- for example, there is one in Machias, ME) and other
sources of low frequency radio noise interfere with the loran signal to the
extent that the loran receiver cannot track properly. This is why most lorans
have built-in filters (as many as 9 or more) to reduce interference with the
loran signal. We have been within a few miles of the Machias transmitter (the
antenna is some 21 towers over 1000' high). The only effect we saw was a 10
microsecond error in our loran's displayed TDs. But then our loran was
designed maybe 10 years ago (pre-historic times for lorans) and has only four
filters. A more modern design might be less affected.
|
455.9 | your equipment or Norfolk | TYCOBB::J_BORZUMATO | | Thu Aug 24 1989 11:21 | 12 |
| correction to .6
the second sentence shoud read "destroys your loran signal and
its ability to perform" certainly couldn't destroy your loran.
on filtering, doubtfully units that are 5 years or older,
would have the filter required to block out the Norfolk
transmitter. I would suggest that you call a "qualified
service center" for your unit and discuss it with them
if you are having a problem with reception, that is
not related to a failure on your boat.
jim.
|
455.10 | loran interference from a solar cell circuit | UNIFIX::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Wed Jul 01 1992 12:12 | 33 |
| I recently had an interesting experience with my loran that I wanted to share.
A few weeks ago, my Apelco DXL6300 stopped working - all it would give is
a continuous "No Signal" display. After talking with a helpful gentleman
at the Apelco repair center in Hudson, N.H. he confirmed my suspicion that
it was most likely either the active antenna coupler or the coax cable.
On the boat, it was dead, at home on a power supply (13.8v) it worked fine.
Back and forth 3 times between home and the boat - the same each time.
Sunday, when I brought the boat home from the lake in preparation for a month
of salt water adventures, I found it was working fine in the driveway off the
boat's battery. I looked for what was different. We had taken down the solar
cell from the stern rail and packed it in a compartment for trailering.
As soon as I got it out of the compartment (still wired to the battery)
the signal-to-noise numbers took a dive into the unusable range. As soon as
I covered the solar cell up, they come back to excellent values.
This was a small 5" "Solargizer" that I had picked up at an auction for $5.
The card it came on indicated that it "conditioned" batteries with a
pulsating current. I should have been suspicious at that point. Anyhow,
with the loran and the Solargizer connected directly to the battery,
there was so much electrical noise that the loran was unusable.
I'm very glad that I did the troubleshooting myself rather than paying
Apelco $159 flat rate to "fix" a problem that didn't exist in the loran.
I'll probably keep the Solargizer, despite its rather meager output current,
but it will definitely have an on-off switch installed very soon.
Bill
|