T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
16.1 | What mass exise tax?? | TOOK::SWEET | Capt. Codfish...Jeffries Ledge or Bust | Thu May 19 1988 10:49 | 6 |
| Walt, what about this exise tax, I pay it on my car and my boat
trailer but have never seen a bill for my boat. Are boats subject
to mass exise tax? Does it have anything to do with having a slip
as opposed to trailering?
Bruce
|
16.2 | Can't avoid the taxes | SALEM::MCWILLIAMS | | Thu May 19 1988 12:22 | 34 |
| Actually, the 'Sales' tax is an excise/use tax which means that
if;
a) You are a MA resident and your first use is in MA waters. You
will pay 5% of the sale price or the tax departments valuation
of the boat.
b) If you are an non-MA resident and your first use is in MA waters
you likewise have to pay.
The only way to avoid the tax is to;
a) Buy the boat outside of MA.
b) Actively use the boat outside of MA for at least 6 months.
(this means show registration dated at least 6 months from
another state. Show that the boat was used/stored outside
of MA for at least 6 months) - (I had to show my registration
my storage bills from Great Bay Marine in NH, and a copy of
the mooring bill for the previous year).
Excise tax will be assessed based on the value of the boat, depending
where it is used (as of July 1 I believe). A portion of the money
goes to the local town which collects it, and a portion goes to
the state.
Trailered boats should be charged on the basis of where they are
registered, but many local towns presently over look this source of
revenue. If the boat is moored, then the local harbourmaster makes a
list of the boats in his/her harbor which gets submitted to the local
tax department.
A boat must be registered in MA if it is stays in MA waters for 30 days
(I believe it is continuously). Maine has a 90 day requirement.
/jim
|
16.4 | Don't tell the Duke about this! | NRADM::WILSON | You have my word on it... | Thu May 19 1988 14:01 | 25 |
| RE: Note 16.3
>> Most towns don't inforce it unless they have a heavy boating
>> population. And I for sure am not going to go running down
>> to the town hall to be the first to pay!
This is definitely true. This is my 5th year with a boat registered
in Mass, and the town has never made any attempt to collect the tax.
>> I'm glad my boats not in Marblehead!! As the Tax rate is
>> different in different towns as is there evaluation of your boat.
Are you sure about this Walt? Since I've never been billed I don't
know for sure about boats, but I know the automobile excise tax is
figured at a consistent rate state-wide. They charge $25 per thousand
of valuation, and have a formula for figuring the value based on age
and original list price. It does not take condition or market value
into consideration. The excise tax value on my friend's $20,000
Pantera was $1,000!
Unless they use a totally different system for boats, I don't think
that towns are free to set their own excise tax rate and arbitrarily
determine the value of your boat.
Rick W.
|
16.5 | re: exise tax | BOMBE::CUMMINGS | Paul T. Cummings LTN2 | Thu May 19 1988 14:10 | 7 |
| Also, I believe the exise tax is due to the down where the
boat is located on January first (like car exise?). I know
of one local tax colector who get up bright and early on New
Years day an makes a trip to the local warehouse where he
knows boats are stored and writes down numbers. Then the
bills go out, even though the people have never boated in the
town nor do they live there.
|
16.6 | Move to tewksbury | TOOK::SWEET | Capt. Codfish...Jeffries Ledge or Bust | Thu May 19 1988 14:11 | 5 |
| I think I am glad I like in Tewksbury!!!! I guess I have been getting
away with something for a couple of years! Yes Virginia, there is
a christmas afterall!
Capt Never_paid_exise_tax_yet_Codfish
|
16.7 | Mass registration | HPSTEK::BHOVEY | | Thu May 19 1988 15:04 | 8 |
|
I just picked up the new Mass boating law book today. It states
that a boat numbered under the approved numbering system of another
state may operate for 60 days in Mass before requiring new numbers.
Thought this info would be helpfull.
Bill Hovey-Marlboro
|
16.9 | EXCISE TAX | REGENT::BURBINE | | Fri May 20 1988 08:44 | 13 |
| re:< Note 16.8 by AD::GIBSON >
-< Oopp's Din't sea tha one. >-
Where I live the harbor master has to submit a list of boats
that are in the harbor (moored,berthed etc) as of July first.
This data is then used to send out excise taxt bills. This year
is the first year for this system. Unless the excise tax bill is
paid no mooring renewel. It will probably take several years for
this system to catch up with the non payers. But then why should
anyone volunteer to pay. Many towns just do not bother to collect
the tax because there is no real way for them to enforce it.
norm
|
16.10 | What if you had TWO? | AD::GIBSON | | Fri May 20 1988 10:00 | 14 |
| O.K. Norm didn't mean you. Sorry. But I heard rumors of a few that
do.
Good point! What about if I had moorings/ Slips in more than one
location?? Say on the Cape and up north or elswere.
Which tax applies??? or do I get double wammy from both towns?
What if I kept a skiff on one, with the Big Boat only there Tempory?
What If????
Walt
|
16.11 | ?ABANDONED BOAT? | REGENT::BURBINE | | Fri May 20 1988 13:52 | 13 |
| re.< Note 16.10 by AD::GIBSON >
re.-< What if you had TWO? >-
re. O.K. Norm didn't mean you. Sorry. But I heard rumors of a few that
do.
No sweat the harbor master also has the authority to tow and
store abandoned boats.
On the other side one only has to prove that they pay the tax
somewhere else and the town will abate it.
norm
|
16.12 | How about this one. | WFOVX3::GIBSON | catch me...if you can | Wed Jun 01 1988 10:37 | 11 |
|
re: 7
Bill,
My boat is registered in Mass., but I keep it berthed in Conn.
Does your law book have any info on this matter?
Andy...
|
16.13 | Boat Excise Tax Law | SAGE::RODENHISER | | Mon Jun 06 1988 14:35 | 82 |
|
Here's how the Mass Boat Excise Tax system works:
<<< MSCSSE::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SAILING.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Sailing >-
================================================================================
Note 80.0 Summary of Mass Tax Laws 4 replies
HOLST::RODENHISER 71 lines 31-JAN-1985 12:17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Mass Boat Tax (Effective July 1,1979)
TO WHOM IT APPLIES
Ships and vessels, except those used in or designated for use in the carrying
trade or commercial fishing, shall be taxed to the owner as of July 1st in
the town where it is habitually moored or docked, otherwise where it is
principally situated during the calendar year.
TYPE OF VESSEL
"Vessel", includes every description of watercraft, including documented
boats and ships, used or capable of being used as a means of transportation
on water, and includes all equipment, including mode of power, and
furnishings that are normally required aboard the vessel during the
accomplishment of the function for which the vessel is being utilized.
VESSEL LOCATION
"Habitually moored or docked", shall mean the place where the owner has usual
mooring or dockage for the summer season.
THE TAX
Except as hereinafter provided there shall be assessed and levied by each
city and town in each fiscal year on every vessel, and its equipment, for the
privilege of using the waterways of the commonwealth, an excise tax measured
by the value thereof, as hereinafter defined and determined, at the rate of
ten dollars per thousand of valuation.
HOW THE TAX WORKS
Any person who owns such vessel on July 1st shall annually, on or before
August 1st, make a return on oath to the assessors of the city or town where
such vessel is habitually moored or docked, or in the case of a vessel which
has no mooring or docking space, where said vessel is principally situated,
setting forth the vessel's registration number or documentation number, if
any; an adequate description, as well as the owner's estimate of the fair
cash value, of said vessel and any engine of motor used to propel said
vessel, as of the next July 1st; and the place of habitual mooring or docking
or other principal location of said vessel. If boat is transferred tax may
be pro-rated.
Value shall be fair cash valu but not in excess of:
LOA VALUE
(Excluding Bowsprit & Boomkins) < 4 Yr old 4-6 Yr old 7 Yr or greater
< 16' $ 1,000 $ 700 $ 400
16' - < 17.5' 1,500 1,000 800
17.5' - < 20' 3,000 2,000 1,500
20' - < 22.5' 5,000 3,300 2,500
22.5 - < 25' 7,500 5,000 3,800
25' - < 27.5' 10,500 7,000 5,300
27.5' - < 30' 14,000 9,300 7,000
30' - < 35' 18,500 12,300 9,300
35' - < 40' 24,000 16,000 12,000
40' - < 50' 31,500 21,000 15,800
50' - < 60' 41,000 27,300 20,500
60' or over 50,000 33,000 24,800
Excise shall not apply to vessels of a value of $1,000 or less.
FAILURE TO COMPLY
If failure to file by Aug 1st deadline, but owner files by Oct 31st, tax may
be increased by 50%.
WHERE TAX GOES
All sums received from the excise imposed under this chapter shall be paid
into the treasury of the city or town and 50% of said excise shall be
credited to the municipal waterways improvement and maintenance fund.
For more information see Chapter 40,59 & 60B of the General Laws (as amended
by Chapter 581 of the Acts of 1978).
|
16.14 | B & Bs? | TOMCAT::SUTER | Water is meant to ski on! | Mon Jun 06 1988 15:20 | 12 |
|
RE: .-1
Thanks for posting that...
Sounds like if you are a Mass resident and the boat is kept
all summer in NH that you are not eligible for taxation.??
What the hell are Bowsprits & Boomkins??
Rick
|
16.15 | B & B defined... | SCOMAN::BOURGAULT | | Thu Jun 09 1988 05:56 | 24 |
|
Re: Bowsprits and Boomkins
Out of my memory, but reasonably certain of both:
Bowsprits are sprits that stick out over the bow... particularly
on sailing vessels, that neat little "point" that holds lines from
the forward mast is the bowsprit. (Sometimes there is a second
pole sticking downward from the bowsprit, with a guy line over it.
This downward-pointing pole is called a "dolphin striker".)
Boomkins are small booms.... that stick out over the back end (stern).
The boom is the horizontal pole that holds the lower edge of a sail,
and on most sail rigs it is located over deck area. On some sail
rigs, though, the rearmost mast is so close to the stern that the
boom (boomkin) is actually hanging out over water. If memory
serves, the word yawl describes such a sail rig....
The "excluding bowsprits and boomkins" part is telling you that
they are measuring the LOA (Length Over All) of the hull, not
counting little things hanging over the ends. (Kind of like
measuring the length of your pickup truck, and NOT counting the
lumber sticking out over the tail....)
- Ed Bourgault -
|
16.16 | comments | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Fri Jun 10 1988 14:04 | 37 |
| re .3:
>>> The reason Delaware corporations Documentation is not done
>>> anymore is that you have to pay Excise if your boat is berthed in
>>> Ma. over 30 days, and they do check on it!
No, excise tax is not the reason -- it is the sales/use tax on the boat
and taxes on the corporation. Massachusetts tax officials check the
documentation and corporation records in Delaware looking for boats
owned by Delaware corporations which are owned by Massachusetts
residents. They then bill the owners of the corporation for sales tax.
But there is more to come. A corporation is doing business in
Massachusetts if it has assets (like a boat) in Massachusetts. So the
corporation must pay the state corporate excise tax ($228 per year
minimum) and a fee to the secretary of the commonwealth ($70 per year).
If the corporation sells the boat to, say, the president of the company,
then Massachusetts grins and bills for the sales tax again. Does this
sound like bitter experience?
re .8:
>>> O.K. But what about a federally Documented boat?? It is not beholden
>>> to any state in particular. So shouldn't that exempt the vessel
>>> from individual state taxes??
All federal documentation does is exempt you from state registration.
You still must pay any and all state taxes the state(s) impose.
re 15:
A bowsprit is any structure extending forward of the hull of a sailboat
that is used to carry standing rigging. Similarly, a boomkin is any
structure extending aft of the hull used to carry standing rigging. Yes,
a boom supports the lower edge of a sail. Some booms extend aft of the
hull (eg, yawls, schooners, vintage sloops), some don't.
|
16.17 | A little off the subject but. . . | CHIRPA::PARR | | Mon Jun 13 1988 11:48 | 12 |
| re: -1
Having just registered my boat in NH, and also getting the Coast
Guard numbers (I'm assuming that's what federally documented means,
please no flames if I'm wrong) do you mean I didn't really have
to get the silly little license plate type thing to affix to the
stern once I had the CG numbers on the bow??
Thanx for any info,
Brian
|
16.18 | ex | CSSE32::APRIL | Winter Wanderer | Mon Jun 13 1988 12:25 | 23 |
| >< Note 16.17 by CHIRPA::PARR >
> -< A little off the subject but. . . >-
>
> re: -1
>
> Having just registered my boat in NH, and also getting the Coast
> Guard numbers (I'm assuming that's what federally documented means,
> please no flames if I'm wrong) do you mean I didn't really have
> to get the silly little license plate type thing to affix to the
> stern once I had the CG numbers on the bow??
>
>> Thanx for any info,
Brian,
NH recognizes CG numbers on coastal waterways ONLY. You *MUST*
register the boat for use on inland water. Vermont recognizes
CG numbers for any waterway (but I register the boat with the
state anyways since its only 9.00 or so).
Chuck
|
16.19 | documentation | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Jun 14 1988 14:24 | 16 |
| re .17:
>>> Having just registered my boat in NH, and also getting the Coast
>>> Guard numbers (I'm assuming that's what federally documented means,
>>> please no flames if I'm wrong) do you mean I didn't really have
>>> to get the silly little license plate type thing to affix to the
>>> stern once I had the CG numbers on the bow??
Federal documentation is only for boats with a tonnage of 6 or greater,
where tonnage is calculated by some obscure formula. Generally, boats
under 26' don't quality. Documentation numbers must be carved into the
main beam of the vessel (which usually means carved into a wood board
which is then permanently -- expoxied -- to the inside of the hull). One
of the advantages/disadvantages of the documentation numbers is that
they are not visible from outside the boat. So far as I know (which may
not be very far), documented boats are exempt from state registration.
|
16.20 | a form of rape | ROBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Thu Sep 01 1988 11:41 | 23 |
| I live in New Hampshire. My 24' cuddy is registered here. That
gives me a car-type plate to be screwed on the transom. I can use
it in any New Hampshire lake. No one else recognizes NH boat
registration. So, I register with the Coast Guard. That gives me
bow numbers. I can now use the boat in any "coastal" waters.
Read that bays, ocean, and rivers below the last dam.
I *cannot* use the boat in a lake in any other state in the
union. To do that, I'd have to register in one of the other 49
states. Actually, I believe Hawaii, Alaska, and Washington DC do
not recognize any other boat registration than theirs for inland
waters.
We don't have a sales tax here; Taxachusetts hates that. To
register in Taxachusetts I'd have to pay the sales tax for a
transaction that never happened in their state.
So, if I would capitulate and pay the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts their rapacious tax, I could register there, and
then be able to use the boat in at least 48 states. Or I can
thumb my nose at them, use it in NH - and spend my money here -
and use it in any salt water I wish. That's precisely what I do.
|
16.21 | Pay no Tax... | BINKLY::SMITH | | Thu Sep 01 1988 12:20 | 9 |
| RE:20
As a NH resisdent can register your boat in Mass. without paying
sales tax if you can show that the boat has been registered in NH
for more than 6 months.
/Mike Smith
|
16.22 | | MYVAX::ONEILL | | Thu Sep 01 1988 14:39 | 5 |
| RE. 20
It's Washington State not Washington D.C.
|
16.23 | Use Maine | DR::HAIGH | | Fri Sep 02 1988 16:07 | 10 |
| Register your boat in Maine.
I live in Nashua and have done that to mine and a pricely cost
of $4.00 per year, no tax as I keep the boat in Nashua. Your
restriction is that you can only have 75 days/year use of the boat
in ME. I can run the boat in any of the
other 46 contiguous states.
David.
|
16.24 | Documentation | NAC::SWEET | Capt. Codfish. Desperatly seeking Charlie | Mon Oct 31 1988 16:04 | 9 |
| Time to reopen an old topic...
Documentation...I have just been informed by the finanance co. that
my new Grady will have to be documented. It is 25' w/ 9.6' beam.
Isn't this boat to small to have to be docuemented? They are charging
me a $400 documentation fee that I would be much happyier spending
elsewhere. Anyone know any recourse on this?
Bruce
|
16.25 | a solution | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Oct 31 1988 17:10 | 2 |
| go to another finance company
|
16.26 | | HAZEL::YELINEK | WITHIN 10 | Tue Nov 01 1988 10:28 | 14 |
| I thought there were specific atributes of the vessel which would
dictate whether it should be documented or not...
I seem to remember length somewhere around 27 feet....
and it the vessel weights over a certain tonage.
Hey, you don't require numbers on the hull if its documented right.?
Also, isn't there a law (maybe a use-to-be OLD law) that said that
the government, should they require..., could call on the use of
your 'documented' vessel during a period or war.?
/MArk
|
16.27 | Need good name now... | NAC::SWEET | Capt. Codfish. Desperatly seeking Charlie | Tue Nov 01 1988 13:07 | 8 |
| Apparenty the 25 grady with the wide beam is one of the few
documentable 25's and the bank is requireing it. I will
have to live with it...now if I can just come up
with a good catchy name...'Happy Hooker'? Nah, the wife would
kill me!
Capt Codfish
|
16.28 | NAME THAT BOAT! | ATEAM::MERCURIO | $set hook/fish_on | Tue Nov 01 1988 13:12 | 6 |
|
How's about.......
TOOT_SWEET
|
16.29 | How Sweet it is... | BINKLY::SMITH | | Tue Nov 01 1988 16:43 | 18 |
|
Need a name? How about
"How sweet it is"
or the french version of "right away": "toute suite"
or as mentioned in .-1 the toy that mashed tootsie rolls into
candy whistles, "Toot sweet" (how many of you remember those)
how about something along the lines of "Boat(home) Sweet Boat(home)"
Must be nice to have a name you can get creative with, its kind
of tough with Smith.
Good luck,
Mike Smith
|
16.30 | | IND::SAPIENZA | Knowledge applied is wisdom gained. | Tue Nov 01 1988 20:12 | 27 |
|
Are you sure the Grady is documentable?
When I was looking for financing on my boat (a boxy 25' cabin
cruiser) I was told that, in general, only boats over 27-29 feet
can fit the documentation requirements (as mentioned in a prior
reply).
From what I can recall, the calculation involves determining
the volume of space below the gunwale line (which is termed tonnage
or some such). Basically you take the vertical distance between
the gunwale plane (imaginary flat deck at the gunwale, covering
the hull) and the lowest point in the hull (typically at the keel).
You also need to take into account the shape of the hull, I believe.
Anyway, I had to call the factory to get the correct figure and
was told that my boat couldn't be documented. You might want to
do the same to double-check before shelling out any money.
Something to consider: If the boat is documentable, and if you still
owe a significant amount on it, documentation opens up a whole lot more
financing sources for you. You may want to shop around for a lower rate
if the boat gets documented.
Frank
|
16.31 | The Grady is documentable | NAC::SWEET | Capt. Codfish. Desperatly seeking Charlie | Wed Nov 02 1988 08:30 | 14 |
| I decided to call a documentation service to ask some of the questions
in -.1. It turned out the place I called was handling my application
at the time (small world of boating...). The woman I spoke to said
the GW 25' is one of the few documentable 25's and if wanted to
get around documentation I would have to find another bank. I went
through 1st commercial corp who was advertised in the globe. I am
getting a 10.5 fixed rate simple interest loan for 15 yrs. I called
around to couple other places and they seemed to have the best rate.
Thanks for the name suggestions...my wife likes "Sweet Dream II"
but I will pass along some of the suggestions posted here. Keep
them comming, I close on monday.
Bruce
|
16.32 | the real reason | MRMFG1::J_BORZUMATO | | Wed Nov 02 1988 10:31 | 12 |
| the reason a bank or lending institution requires documentation
is to secure a clear title. in the documentation process, each
of the previous owners, is contacted, and asked to sign what
amounts to another bill of sale, right up to and including you.
wait till you sign over your power of attorney to the lender,
for the boat "only" this way they don't even have to talk
to you if you default, they just have the "vessel" picked up.
Now do they have their hands on your pockets or what???????
I could put this another way, but you got the message..
jim.
|
16.33 | A catchy name but..... | VICKI::DODIER | | Tue Nov 08 1988 12:06 | 14 |
| re:31
Sweet Dream is similar to the name I had on my old 15' Seasquirt
which was.......
******* Wet Dream *******
I was a little late getting back in one day and my wife called
the coast guard. The dispatcher said "Let me get this straight,
you want us to go look for a Seasquirt called the Wet Dream ? Is
this a crank call ?"
RAYJ
|
16.34 | Sherman,Set the wayback machine! | AD::GIBSON | Lobst'a Ayah | Thu Nov 10 1988 12:03 | 19 |
| Mark
Your'e right about Boat being confiscated during time of war, My
grandfather had to give up his fishing boat that he kept in Newburyport
uring WW II, I guess the Navy or Coast Guard needed extra's for
coast patrols. I sort of remember him teelling me the story when
I was a young'un. I'll have to dig up some old family photo's someday
to take a look at the boat. Don't know what kind it was.
A rel good name for a boat would be the "Hey Day" but it wouldn't
sound right on the radio.
A big advantage of Documentation is getting a clear title as was
said. I've heard a lot of horror storys about the super deal on
a used boat that turned out to be the owner dumpped it so they would
not have to pay all the maintaince and storage bills leined against
it. The new owner gets a big suprize!
Walt
|
16.35 | Cranks and Names. | SCOMAN::BOURGAULT | I have a story to tell..... | Thu Dec 08 1988 02:27 | 13 |
| Re: .33 on the Seasquirt "Wet Dream". I believe it. We (I) used
to get more of those type of calls that I like to remember...
I especially don't like to think of the ones I MISSED picking up
on.... even when we called back to confirm...
Re: picking a name. I suggest finding a copy of the listing of
documented vessels. (Your local Coast Guard station probably has
one... though maybe not the LATEST edition.) Just "wander" through
the names used.... it should stimulate your imagination!!
(Also, by seeing which ones have MULTIPLE listings, it could
give you an idea what to stay AWAY from!).
- Ed -
|
16.36 | Lowell Tea Party? | ARCHER::SUTER | I see a little open water!!!! | Wed Mar 15 1989 10:27 | 23 |
|
Oh yes! I received an interesting note in the US mail
yesterday!
AN EXCISE TAX BILL FOR THE BOAT!!!!!!!!!!
But according to < Note 16.13 by SAGE::RODENHISER > it sounds
like I don't have to pay. It states:
> TO WHOM IT APPLIES
> Ships and vessels, except those used in or designated for use in the carrying
> trade or commercial fishing, shall be taxed to the owner as of July 1st in
> the town where it is habitually moored or docked, otherwise where it is
> principally situated during the calendar year.
And the Nautique spends 5 or 6 months of the year in Effingham, NH
and 4 or 5 months in a barn in Goffstown, NH. Has anyone told them
to stick their excise tax bill for similar reasons?
Rick
|
16.37 | don't ignore it | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Mar 15 1989 12:08 | 7 |
| re -.1:
Do you live in Massachusetts? If so, I'd formally request an abatement
from the town that is billing you. You might get it. In any case, you'll
owe some minimum amount (maybe $5). I would not ignore the excise tax
bill. The state can get very nasty about such things, and lawyers and
penalities are expensive.
|
16.38 | | ARCHER::SUTER | I see a little open water!!!! | Wed Mar 15 1989 13:03 | 5 |
|
Yes, I live in Lowell, Ma. I'll talk to them and try not
to get heated until they say NO. I'll report on the results.
Rick
|
16.39 | Gottcha... | TAZRAT::WHYNOT | | Wed Mar 15 1989 13:11 | 8 |
| Rick,
That's one of the MANY reasons why I got seperate receipts for
my boat and trailer. The trailer is registered in Mass, and yes
I paid sales tax and yearly excise tax. As for the boat...
What boat?? You mean the one that resides and is only used in N.H.?
Good Luck on this one...
Doug
|
16.40 | | WBC::RODENHISER | | Wed Mar 15 1989 18:05 | 14 |
| Re: .36
My note (.13) was copied verbatum from a flyer put out by the state
and *should* reflect the law. I suspect that one really needs to
read the referenced General Laws and Acts to know for sure.
Many times I see the terms Sales, Use, and Excise tax used
interchangeably and so it may be with this tax.
They may have a case based on where you are using it for those two
months. After all, no one is billed on a prorated basis determined by the
number of days the boat is used, etc. But, as Alan suggests, I'd
apply for the abatement.
|
16.41 | | ABYSS::amato | | Thu Mar 16 1989 07:41 | 0 |
16.42 | | WBC::RODENHISER | | Fri Mar 17 1989 13:23 | 9 |
| Correction to .40:
Upon further checking I realized that my source was NOT a document
produced by Mass but rather by the "Mass Marine Trade Assoc."
refering to state documents.
Hate to say it, but after rereading the summary, I think the operative
phrase is: "for the privilege of *using* the waterways of the
commonwealth".
|
16.43 | Money back! | TOMCAT::SUTER | I see a little open water!!!! | Tue Mar 28 1989 12:14 | 8 |
|
And the finding is........
An abatement for the entire amount of excise tax was
issued without any problems once I explained the fact that
the boat spends 10-11 months in NH.
Rick
|
16.44 | More excise tax $$$ | GOLF::WILSON | | Tue Apr 28 1992 11:57 | 17 |
| Moved by moderator...
================================================================================
Note 1.18 Welcome Back 18 of 18
PARITY::RZASA 10 lines 27-APR-1992 15:30
-< MORE EXCISE TAX $$$$$ >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a note that I would like all of the boat owners in this file to
see. It intails a change in House Bill 5128 of The commonwealth of
Massachusetts, that the State is trying to Pass. Either way they say
it,they are trying to raise the excise tax on all boat owners who are
registered and use the waters in the State. I am not quite sure as to
how to enter this into the system,or does the mod do this. I have the
names and address of the Sen.& Rep.to whom to send letters of oppisition.
I am only able to enter a reply, could mr. moderator instruct me as to
what to do. thanking you in advance.
|
16.45 | Urgent Legislative Alert | GOLF::WILSON | | Tue May 26 1992 13:34 | 87 |
| Moved by moderator... (and glad I live in NH)
================================================================================
Note 1.19 Welcome Back 19 of 19
PARITY::RZASA 80 lines 26-MAY-1992 11:47
-< URGENT LEGISLATIVE ALERT >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a copy of the letter from MBYCA (Massachusetts Bay Yaucht
Clubs Association,Inc)
LEGISLATIVE ALERT
HOUSE BILL 5128 WILL MORE THAN DOUBLE YOUR BOAT EXCISE TAX
This year the most serious attempt to increase this tax in recent
years is being pushed by several Cape Cod Groups.
These groups have their eye on the money reimbursed to cities and towns
and earmarked for a waterways improvement fund.
They intend the money to be diverted to enviromental and away from
recreational projects.
The projected change in the Law would INCREASE the present tax by
amounts ranging from ( 66% TO 400% ) MORE than the PRESENT schedule
PLEASE do the following !!! NOW !!!
WRITE your Representative and Senator, Express your Opposition to House
Bill 5128. Be sure to also SEND a copy of your letter to:
Hon. Angelo Sciacca Sen. William Keating
Room 236 State House Room 424 State House
Boston,Ma 02133 Boston Ma 02133
Phone 722-2430 Phone 722-1222
Advise all boat owners who register their boats in this state of this
problem and ask them to call both their Rep. and the Senator and the
Chairman listed above.
House Bill 5128 will at least double your excise tax and could result
in an increase of up to 400%. We will actively oppose this Bill but WE
can not do it ALONE your help is needed by your letters and phone calls.
I have a copy of the actual bill and what they want to Amend is as follows
Section 1. section 2 of chapter 60B (Strike out in line 5 the word "ten" to
the word - Twenty-Five.
Section 2. Said section 2 of said chapter 60B,is further amended by
striking subsection (C) and inserting the following subsection
(C)For the purpose of computing the excise under this chapter the
value of each such Vessel and its equipment shall be deemed to be the
fair market value determined by the assessors based on the BUC Boat
Price Guide, provided,however,no such excise shall exceed one thousand
dollars.
Section 3. Said section 2 of said chapter 60B, is further amended by
striking out in line 57 the word "FIFTY" and inserting the word
"Seventy-Five"
And it goes on and on. The bottom line is, the Owners of the larger
boats say 50 ft and bigger,whom can afford the excise tax,will not have
to pay any tax higher than one thousad dollars. as stated in section 2.
However a person like myself with a 32 ft 1972 who pays 100 dollars now
per year, will jump to $700 or more per year. I don't know about the rest
of you owners out there but between boat payments,insurance,registration
Federal users fees and title fees,and being a non resident with boat
registered in 2 states, I Really Think This Is Not Right At All.
Below is a sample Letter to send in if you choose to.
Date:
Senator Wm. R. Keating
Chairman Committee On Taxation
State House Room 424
Boston,Ma.02133
Dear Senator Keating:
As a boat owner and tax payer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
I am opposed to House Bill 5128 which proposes to raise the excise tax
on boats.I urge you to vote against this bill.
Respectfully,
name & address >
|
16.46 | New Excise tax for boats in Mass | GOLF::WILSON | Stop the Killer Fees | Wed Jun 03 1992 10:26 | 26 |
| Moved by moderator... (and check out my personal_name!)
================================================================================
Note 992.0 New proposed EXCISE TAX for boats in mass No replies
PASSER::PUISHYS "Bob Puishys" 20 lines 3-JUN-1992 09:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok boaters Taxachusetts is back. Time to write you state rep.
House Bill #5128
Will allow the state of mass to determine a book value for boats and
than charge an excise tax for $75.00 /$1000.00. Yearly
so folks with a 10,000 boat will have to pay $750 big ones every year!
The two reps who are started this bill are:
Rep Angelo Sezccia Rep William Keating
chairman chairman
Committee on taxation Committee on taxation
State House Rm 236 State House Rm 414
Boston Ma 02133 Boston, Ma 02133
Now both people can't not be chairman can they? But this was the note I was
given.
Bassin Bob
|
16.47 | new house bill??? | PIPPER::BORZUMATO | | Wed Jun 03 1992 12:49 | 16 |
|
I don't know about you but i already pay an excise on my boat.
There is already a law on the books, and has been for some-time
that allows the towns to determine the book value of your boat
and charge i believe its $10 per thousand.
From what i can tell its no-where near the book value.
Are you talking about something new????
JIm
|
16.48 | | LEDDEV::DEMBA | | Wed Jun 03 1992 13:59 | 9 |
| re: I don't know about you but i already pay an excise on my boat.
JIm,
Are you sure you aren't thinking of the exise tax paid on a
boat trailer?
Steve
|
16.50 | | AIDEV::PUISHYS | Bob Puishys | Wed Jun 03 1992 14:55 | 12 |
| Currently there is an excise tax on you boat trailer send out by the towns
printed by the registery of motor vechiles.
I have never had one on the boat. This is new. It is a house bill in committee
at this time to see if they want to recomend it for a vote for law. A
car/trailer excise tax is only $25/1000 this will be $75/1000 they say
they want to use the money for public access, but the bill does not state
where the money goes, so it will end up in the general fund!!
WRITE YOU REPS!!
Bassin Bob
|
16.51 | | AIDEV::PUISHYS | Bob Puishys | Wed Jun 03 1992 14:55 | 12 |
| Currently there is an excise tax on you boat trailer send out by the towns
printed by the registery of motor vechiles.
I have never had one on the boat. This is new. It is a house bill in committee
at this time to see if they want to recomend it for a vote for law. A
car/trailer excise tax is only $25/1000 this will be $75/1000 they say
they want to use the money for public access, but the bill does not state
where the money goes, so it will end up in the general fund!!
WRITE YOU REPS!!
Bassin Bob
|
16.53 | Act now or pay MORE later! | HPSRAD::HOWARTH | | Wed Jun 03 1992 15:28 | 18 |
| Re: .47
Jim,
The excise tax charged by towns is determined by a State formula
based on the length and the age of the boat. The towns have NO
say in the boat's value. The proposed changes will replace the
fixed value with the value found in the BUC book along with a
change in the per value tax. If I recall correctly, the maximum
tax will be limited to $1000.00/year.
Incidentally, I have already called and written to the bill's
sponsors along with my State senator and representative. People
have a choice, either complain to those who can do something
about the problem or ignore the problem. If they choose to ignore
the problem, they shouldn't complain later when its too late.
Joe
|
16.54 | the boat excise tax is, or at least was, real | DKAS::SPENCER | | Wed Jun 03 1992 15:34 | 16 |
| It's been about ten years now, but I recall paying a Gloucester, MA (yes,
lots of coastline) city tax on our boat of $6 per $1000 valuation. That
valuation was determined by a simple formula that gave specific values for
length ranges (in 10' or larger increments) for different ages. Obviously
some car people dreamt up that scheme, since by the 7th year or so our 33'
ketch was costing us only about $90 in taxes!
Digression: My clearest recollection of the whole boat excise process is
the three years after selling the boat that it took to convince them we
shouldn't pay this tax. Showing them a bill of sale and USCG documentation
transfer didn't seem to affect their sense of civic duty in trying to
collect their due, with accumulated interest yet! It took me three years,
but I finally demonstrated that if you keep pounding a nail over and over
again, it will eventually go through the board. ;-)
J.
|
16.55 | Prop 2 1/2 | SALEM::LAYTON | | Thu Jun 04 1992 13:32 | 8 |
| I believe that the most they can collect for excise ("luxury") tax is
$25 per thousand of valuation. Technically, excise tax can be
collected on any? personal property, like jewelry, mink coats, etc.
The $25 per thousand cap was mandated by a referendum vote in a general
election ten? years ago (Barbara Anderson, where are you???).
Carl
|
16.57 | | PASSER::PUISHYS | Bob Puishys | Thu Jun 04 1992 16:44 | 2 |
| They want to boast the value of the boat and raise th tax to $75/1000
|
16.59 | Get a separate bill of sale and title | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Fri Jun 05 1992 09:43 | 10 |
| A fellow boater here at NIO gave me an interesting tip when buying
a boat/trailer combo. Get a separate bill of sale and title for the
boat and trailer. That way, you won't have to show a combo bill of
sale/title at your local town hall when you go to register your
trailer. If they see that you also have the boat, they will
get you for the excise tax on it, also. He trailers his boat instead
of keeping it at a marina and hasn't had to pay an excise tax on the
boat.
(One more reason why I moved out of Mass.)
Wayne
|
16.60 | town hall doesn't see BOS or title. | SALEM::LAYTON | | Fri Jun 05 1992 11:11 | 9 |
| Wayne, in Mass you register your trailer at the RMV, which forward the
information to the towns for excise tax collection. The Dept. of
Floating Objects or whatever the Boat Dept. is called, doesn't seem to
forward its records to the individual town; in fact, you can register
the boat to the town where it is harbored rather than your home town.
How some towns know to collect while others don't remains a mystery
(to me).
Carl
|
16.61 | I pay | PENUTS::GORDON | | Fri Jun 05 1992 13:19 | 10 |
| I pay excise tax to Newburyport. Rowley, where I live, also sent me a
bill the first year I had the boat. The law says you pay the tax to
the town where the boat is on July 1.
Unlike other areas, I feel that I do get something for my boat excise
tax as all/some of it go the the harbormaster in Newburypory and they
are always on the water providing assistance/enforcement when needed.
Gordon
|
16.62 | | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Fri Jun 05 1992 14:23 | 3 |
| In Marblehead, you cannot renew your mooring permit without first paying
the excise tax.
|
16.63 | depends on where you are? | NEST::GREENLAW | | Mon Jun 08 1992 10:53 | 11 |
| If you live in a city or town that has a place for you to use your
boat,and they provide a service for the boat in some way,fine.
The city I live in has NO water available for me to use my boat
in.Fortunately,they do not collect excise taxes on boats.
If I lived along the coastline or on a recreational lake and
the municipality did something for the waterway,I can understand
their reason for collecting the tax.I wouldn't like it,but at
the least I could understand it.
Keith
|
16.64 | depends on where your boat is | HPSRAD::HOWARTH | | Mon Jun 08 1992 12:48 | 9 |
| Re: .63
Keith, I don't know if your from Massachusetts but the law here
doesn't apply to "where you live." The law is where your "boat"
is located. You have to pay an excise tax to the town/city where
your boat is located (moored) as of 1 July of the taxable year.
Joe
|
16.66 | they'll find you | PENUTS::GORDON | | Mon Jun 08 1992 13:03 | 15 |
| re:-1
The town get a file from the state on what boats are registered by
people who live in their town. The town sends you a bill. If you can
prove that you paid the TAX in another MA town then they will give you
a rebate- that's what happened to me.
If you brought the boat to NH for the Weekend Jun 30 - july 2 then your
local town would assume that you hadn't paid the tax.
If you registered the boat in NH then your MA town wouldn't even know
that you had one.
Gordon
|
16.67 | What new tax is next | PENUTS::GORDON | | Mon Jun 08 1992 13:05 | 6 |
| I heard on the Jerry Williams show last week that the south shore towns
are having a meeting of the harbormasters sometime in June. The
subject of this meeting is to dicuss new ways of getting revenue from
the boaters. I wonder what new TAX is next.
Gordon
|
16.68 | | NEST::GREENLAW | | Mon Jun 08 1992 13:29 | 12 |
| Yes,I live in MA.I guess my town doesn't bother collecting the excise
tax on boats.If it comes up at a state level,someone is bound to pick
up on this "oversite".
I just sent my reg. renewal in last week,and there is a line on the
form that asks where the boat was stored/kept/moored or something as
of July 1 of the current year.I would presume that Gardner,where I
live,would be the recipient of any revenue from excise taxes.That
is probably why the question is posed by the registry.
Keith
|
16.69 | I'll never tell. :^) | STEREO::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Mon Jun 08 1992 16:17 | 10 |
|
>>- How does the town where it's parked or moored know it's there,
>> (assuming it's not where you live)? Are you supposed to
>> volunteer that info?
Yes, as a matter of fact you are. I thought that the law was posetd
in here somewhere, but yes, you defintely are supposed to just 'submit'
your tax every year.
Kenny
|
16.70 | where's the line.. | PIPPER::BORZUMATO | | Tue Jun 09 1992 09:33 | 13 |
|
I have not (other than this file) heard anything about increased
excise taxes.
Anyway, we all have a threshold to live within. If they get outa
hand with taxes, they'll be by themselves.
Increase the price and the customer doesn't buy. In this case
they will force enough people out, that they won't need
a "Harbormaster" or Marina's.
JIm
|
16.71 | Write letters! | HPSRAD::HOWARTH | | Tue Jun 09 1992 15:02 | 29 |
| Re: .65 & .70
Re:-.65
The towns get there information directly from the marinas and
yacht clubs. Any town located on the water knows the names and
locations of these facilities. The information doesn't come from
the State. My boat is documented and the State doesn't get any
information from me pertaining to my boat size, location nor
excise tax payments. If one trailers his boat, the towns
probably won't be able to catch him.
Re:- .70
Jim,
There was an article written up recently in either Soundings or
Offshore that described the tax. I just received an answer from
Senator William Keating (Chairman, Senate Taxation Committee) to
the letter I wrote expressing my opposition to the tax pending in
the House. The tax is REAL if the bill (#5128) passes!
This matter can be fought by letters to your State senator, local
representative, Representative Angelo Sciacca, Chairman,
House Taxation Committee and Senator Keating. UNFORTUNATELY, most
people choose to ignore the problem and do nothing. If the bill
becomes law, and people have to PAY MORE for excise tax, then
everyone who did nothing will start to complain, but too late.
Joe
|
16.72 | Here it is. | STEREO::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Tue Jun 09 1992 15:47 | 82 |
|
Mass Boat Excise Tax system.
<<< MSCSSE::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SAILING.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Sailing >-
================================================================================
Note 80.0 Summary of Mass Tax Laws 4 replies
HOLST::RODENHISER 71 lines 31-JAN-1985 12:17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Mass Boat Tax (Effective July 1,1979)
TO WHOM IT APPLIES
Ships and vessels, except those used in or designated for use in the carrying
trade or commercial fishing, shall be taxed to the owner as of July 1st in
the town where it is habitually moored or docked, otherwise where it is
principally situated during the calendar year.
TYPE OF VESSEL
"Vessel", includes every description of watercraft, including documented
boats and ships, used or capable of being used as a means of transportation
on water, and includes all equipment, including mode of power, and
furnishings that are normally required aboard the vessel during the
accomplishment of the function for which the vessel is being utilized.
VESSEL LOCATION
"Habitually moored or docked", shall mean the place where the owner has usual
mooring or dockage for the summer season.
THE TAX
Except as hereinafter provided there shall be assessed and levied by each
city and town in each fiscal year on every vessel, and its equipment, for the
privilege of using the waterways of the commonwealth, an excise tax measured
by the value thereof, as hereinafter defined and determined, at the rate of
ten dollars per thousand of valuation.
HOW THE TAX WORKS
Any person who owns such vessel on July 1st shall annually, on or before
August 1st, make a return on oath to the assessors of the city or town where
such vessel is habitually moored or docked, or in the case of a vessel which
has no mooring or docking space, where said vessel is principally situated,
setting forth the vessel's registration number or documentation number, if
any; an adequate description, as well as the owner's estimate of the fair
cash value, of said vessel and any engine of motor used to propel said
vessel, as of the next July 1st; and the place of habitual mooring or docking
or other principal location of said vessel. If boat is transferred tax may
be pro-rated.
Value shall be fair cash valu but not in excess of:
LOA VALUE
(Excluding Bowsprit & Boomkins) < 4 Yr old 4-6 Yr old 7 Yr or greater
< 16' $ 1,000 $ 700 $ 400
16' - < 17.5' 1,500 1,000 800
17.5' - < 20' 3,000 2,000 1,500
20' - < 22.5' 5,000 3,300 2,500
22.5 - < 25' 7,500 5,000 3,800
25' - < 27.5' 10,500 7,000 5,300
27.5' - < 30' 14,000 9,300 7,000
30' - < 35' 18,500 12,300 9,300
35' - < 40' 24,000 16,000 12,000
40' - < 50' 31,500 21,000 15,800
50' - < 60' 41,000 27,300 20,500
60' or over 50,000 33,000 24,800
Excise shall not apply to vessels of a value of $1,000 or less.
FAILURE TO COMPLY
If failure to file by Aug 1st deadline, but owner files by Oct 31st, tax may
be increased by 50%.
WHERE TAX GOES
All sums received from the excise imposed under this chapter shall be paid
into the treasury of the city or town and 50% of said excise shall be
credited to the municipal waterways improvement and maintenance fund.
For more information see Chapter 40,59 & 60B of the General Laws (as amended
by Chapter 581 of the Acts of 1978).
|
16.73 | What a deal! | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Wed Jun 10 1992 08:52 | 4 |
| For a small $5 fee, Norcross Marina, located in Brookline, NH, will
gladly store any and all Mass. boats on July 1st. Register early for
space is limited.
Wayne
|
16.74 | | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Jun 10 1992 10:44 | 6 |
| re .73:
Reread .72 before you do this. The law says "habitually moored" or
something to this effect. Simply not being at your dock or mooring
July 1st won't work.
|
16.76 | not in my town pardner | NEST::GREENLAW | | Wed Jun 10 1992 11:45 | 17 |
| I just called the tax collector's office for Gardner.The lady that
answered the phone said "no,we don't collect for boats." I told her
that it was my understanding that the law was on the books and they
could collect.She stated that she owns a boat,has never paid excise
on it,and she also said hey,don't start anything.
I told her I just wanted to check.Eventually someone in city gov.
will realize the law exists and they have been giving up $$$$$.$$
that they could have gotten by law.Then they will probably tell us
how much we have saved so far,and long time owners should be happy.
Yeah,they'll probably start collecting it the year I finally have
enough money to buy something new and I get to feel its full effect :-(
Keith
:-(
|
16.77 | Some towns DO send bills! | HPSRAD::HOWARTH | | Wed Jun 10 1992 13:07 | 8 |
| Re: .76
Gardner may not collect but others do. I pay tax to Fairhaven only
because they found my boat on a slip located at Fairhaven Shipyard.
If they didn't bill me, I would not be a "good citizen" and
send my hard earned money to them.
Joe
|
16.78 | Some town tax boats as personal property | MSEDEV::JEMIOLO | | Wed Jun 10 1992 16:44 | 6 |
| Could the confusion over this tax, be the result of some towns taxing
boats as personal property. They can do this under the current law. The
proposed tax, seems to be aimed at boats that are moored on a waterway.
?
JJ
|
16.79 | My 2 cents worth, | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Sat Jun 27 1992 04:45 | 11 |
|
I was a resident of Dudley in '74 when I bought my 15' glastron.
Never paid a dime of excise tax on it. Trailer - yes.
Moved to Webster in 89, no tax bills until I re-registered it
in 91. Didn't take'um long to nail me!! $20.00!! EXCISE TAX.
For the nice ramp, I ain't complainin'. Sure ain't worth it
for the state ramp tho'. Thing's a joke!!
Fred
|
16.80 | do the laws still apply? | PROXY::TAYLOR | | Fri Apr 16 1993 10:08 | 13 |
|
I am a Mass resident, bought, used, stored and registered a boat
in NH for well over a year. We sold our cottage and now believe
the "right" thing to do is to register it in Mass.
From what I read in this note I will not be charged with a sales
tax. Is this still true?
Will I have any problems if I continue to operate under the NH
registration if I store the boat in Mass?
wayne
|
16.81 | where's the law? | PROXY::TAYLOR | | Fri Apr 16 1993 10:37 | 8 |
|
One of the notes mentioned that if I registered, used it,
mored it in another state for 6+ months, I didn't need to
pay sales tax. Where can I get a copy of this law?
wayne
|
16.82 | The bearer of bad news | GOLF::WILSON | Think Spring! | Fri Apr 16 1993 11:06 | 13 |
| Wayne,
I'm no expert, but I *think* Mass is going to try and hit you
up for the sales tax. As a Mass resident, I think the only
way to avoid it, is to prove that you had it registered elsewhere
*AND* paid the sales tax in that state. Since you obviously
didn't pay a sales tax in NH, Mass will probably want it.
Registering the boat in NH for a year helps you obtain a Mass
title more easily, but doesn't exempt you from the Mass sales
tax.
Rick
|
16.83 | Tax | SALEM::GILMAN | | Fri Apr 16 1993 12:53 | 16 |
| How about this story: I bought a new canoe in Mass several years
ago. I live in N.H. so didn't pay a Mass sales tax. I registered
the canoe in N.H. AND Maine so I could use in on vacation in Maine.
A year later MAINE sends me a bill for a Maine State Sales Tax for
buying a canoe in Mass, and having the idiocy to follow the law and
register it in Me. as well as N.H. I suppose I should have not
registered it in Maine and I would have been fine on the tax.
I couldn't believe Maine would come after me for legally not paying
the taxes in two other states.
I never did pay the tax. I simply refused, and Maine didn't persue
it.
Jeff
|
16.84 | Tax :-(. | HOWLIN::NPARE | | Fri Apr 16 1993 13:53 | 13 |
|
Here's another sad story for you. A few years back I bought a boat
trailer in NH (I live in Mass) at the end of the season. I didn't pay
sales tax or registered it until the next spring when the boat came out
of storage. At that point Mass charged me sales tax for the trailer
plus 6 months penalty for not paying the tax when I bought it.
So don't be too surprise if they tried to charge you tax when you
register your boat, just be glad that they do not penalize you from the
time that you bought and the time that register it in Mass.
Frenchy
|
16.85 | Legal? Who knows? | KAHALA::SUTER | Never too Hot! | Fri Apr 16 1993 14:10 | 23 |
|
re: wayne,
Your situation has a slight twist compared to mine several
years ago.
The twist is that you, apparently, were a Mass resident all
along. I was an NH resident with my Nautique registered in NH, for
several years, then I moved to Mass and was exempted from sales tax
under the "more than 6 months elsewhere" clause. As an aside, my
trailer was not exempted because I never officially transfered the
NH trailer registration from my old trailer to the new Nautique
trailer.
My bet is that you'll have to pay since you truly are, and
have been a Mass resident all along.
As for the legality of keeping the boat registered in NH....
That would depend upon primary use...
Rick
|
16.86 | what was the penalty? | PROXY::TAYLOR | | Fri Apr 16 1993 14:45 | 5 |
| re .84
What did the penalty come out to be?
|
16.87 | Penalty, part of living in Taxachusett. | HOWLIN::NPARE | | Tue Apr 20 1993 10:35 | 19 |
|
re -1
The sales tax was $35.00 and the penalty was $24.00 (??percent??)
:-(. They stated that the law was that no matter where you buy any
equipment (ie: car,boat,tv,furniture,etc.), being a Mass resident, you
should pay sales tax (to Mass. or any state then keep receipt for
proof) at purchase or ASAP (within 30 days).
Now I know that you do not have to register a TV or furniture, but
the intent of the law is the same for all items. They just can't
enforce it on everything.
Frenchy_who_had_to_register_his_trailer_in_Mass.
PS: Boating season is finally open, the boat has been summerized :-)
|
16.88 | Taxes | SALEM::GILMAN | | Tue Apr 20 1993 12:55 | 16 |
| I am a N.H. resident. I bought my canoe in Mass. and did not have to
pay a Mass. State Sales Tax. Fine so far. I registered the canoe in
Maine as well as N.H. so I could use the canoe in Maine as well as N.H.
A year later Maine sends me a bill for a Maine State Sales Tax because
I didn't pay the Mass. Sales Tax. Is that legal? What is the rational
behind that stunt other than Maine getting tax money from me?
Has anybody heard of this type of situation before?
The message in this is DON'T register your boat in a state other than your
own because they might decide to tax you for an out of state purchase.
Weird situation.
Jeff
|
16.89 | just part of the cost of ownership | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Apr 20 1993 14:22 | 19 |
| re .88:
The MA sales tax is not just a sales tax -- it is a sales and use tax.
That is, if you use a boat in MA, you must pay the tax with credit given
for taxes paid to other states. I would suspect that Maine's tax is also
a sales and use tax. And, yes, this is apparently quite legal. MA and, I
suppose, other states can get quite insistent about collecting this tax.
Boats have been seized to enforce payment. I know of someone who paid a
lawyer a largeish fee to argue with the MA tax folks. He soon paid the
tax rather than have his boat seized. Oh yes, one more nice touch. If
the state says you owe the tax, and you think you don't, you still have
to pay. Arguing yes/no comes after payment, else you'll be arguing about
getting your boat back, worst case.
IMHO, taxes are just part of the (inordinate) cost of owning a boat. It
just ain't worth the stress to do anything more than shrug and pay. And
all in all, the taxes are a rather small part of the total cost.
Alan
|
16.90 | Huh???? | ESOA11::KOBYLARZE | | Tue Apr 20 1993 14:40 | 15 |
| Question from a potential new boater.......
Re: last few
Do I understand correctly that if I want to use a boat in a state
other than my home state that I first need to register the boat in that
state?
Stated differently, I fish the Quabbin and live in MA. Therefor I
register my boat in MA. I decide that I would to take a week vacation
and fish a lake in NY. Must I first register the boat in NY.
Why would boats be different than autos?
Emil
|
16.91 | Not really different. | ASDS::BURGESS | Waiting for ZEUS to come | Tue Apr 20 1993 15:14 | 45 |
| re <<< Note 16.90 by ESOA11::KOBYLARZE >>>
> -< Huh???? >-
> Question from a potential new boater.......
> Re: last few
> Do I understand correctly that if I want to use a boat in a state
> other than my home state that I first need to register the boat in that
> state?
No - you don't uderstand correctly (-:
It is generally untrue that you have to register a boat in a
state other than its state of principal use.
> Stated differently, I fish the Quabbin and live in MA. Therefor I
> register my boat in MA. I decide that I would to take a week vacation
> and fish a lake in NY. Must I first register the boat in NY.
Assuming that there is full repricocity between the two states
you mention - NO !
> Why would boats be different than autos?
They're not - really, but....
There is some recent history of some states NOT acknowledging
each other's registrations - in particular Mass and New Hampshire, I
think Florida was "different" in some ways too, until recently.
> Emil
Reg
PS Don't get confused with the variations in registrations and
taxations on the one hand - - - and the antics that people
will get up to in order to, errr, "minimize their obligations.
Especially people who live near to a border - on the other
side of which is a community with a different tax structure.
"Yeah - I sorta live HERE, but I do most of THAT over THERE !
so you don't want my taxes, they do, right ?"
|
16.92 | N.H. is now reciprocal with other states that are reciprocal | UNIFIX::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Wed Apr 21 1993 09:06 | 16 |
| > ..recent history about states not acknowledging ... particularly
..N.H.
I believe that is no longer true for N.H. Within the last 2-4 years,
they have standardized with the rest of the U.S. and now are fully
reciprocal with other states registrations. To the best of my
knowledge, one is expected (by all states) to register their boat in
the state of principal use. I'm not aware of any state (around New
Engalnd, at least), that expects you to refister your boat in their
state in addition to having it registered in a different state of
principal use. Some may have a limit on the numbner of days you may
operate in their waters with another states registration. I seem to
recall that this is in the range of 30 - 60 days.
Bill
|
16.93 | maby there's an out | PROXY::TAYLOR | | Wed Apr 21 1993 12:10 | 18 |
| re -.85
A friend of mine is a Mass resident that had a big (= $$)
boat registered and mored for 6+ months in N.H.. He told
me that when he registered in Mass, the 6+ months in N.H.
got him out of paying the sales tax + fines.
Today I called and explained to the Mass Dept of Revenue
that I was a Mass resident and had bought and registered
the boat in N.H. for over a year. They told me they would
fill out a form and waiver the sales tax and penalties :{).
This kind of opens the door to people buying, registering,
and renting a slip for a year in N.H. to get out of the sales
tax.
On Tuesday I'll post a reply as to how I make out :{).
|
16.94 | TAXES | SALEM::GILMAN | | Wed Apr 21 1993 15:01 | 26 |
| re.79 ..... just pay the tax its easier. Yes but that is what the
state government wants and expects you to do. It IS much more
expensive in $ and time to fight them over payment. But as long as
people 'roll over' for such tax abuse the state governments will
continue to take us for every dime they can.
Siezed boat. Ok, them pay the damm tax and THEN fight over it.
When Maine billed me for its' state tax nothing on the forms said
anything about it being a use tax. It may have BEEN a use tax but that
was not clear.
There are taxes and taxes, (read fair and unfair) taxes. It seems to
me that the government and its lawyers have figured out almost every
conceivable method to milk tax dollars out of us. I suppose that next
they will start putting TAXES on the taxes you pay.
Think about it... you are paid your salary which is taxed of course.
Your pay had had a Federal Tax, and a State Tax, and a Social
Security Tax deducted from it.... THEN you go to the store and pay a
SALES tax for the item your buying out of your already triple taxed pay.
And... the government STILL can't balance the books!
Jeff
|
16.95 | Sales tax is not excise tax | GOLF::WILSON | Think Spring! | Wed Apr 21 1993 15:17 | 22 |
| re: Note 16.89
>> The MA sales tax is not just a sales tax -- it is a sales and use tax.
This isn't really true. The Mass sales tax is just that, a tax on the
sale. A one time tax that you will pay, regardless of whether you use
the boat for the next 50 years, or place it in a museum and *never* use
it. In Massachusetts, the "use" tax is called the "excise" tax. It is
charged yearly (or is supposed to be) for the actual privilege of registering
and using your boat in the state of Mass. In "theory", the money is supposed
to be returned to the users in the form of boater services, ramps, law
enforcement etc. We all know where it really goes...
>> IMHO, taxes are just part of the (inordinate) cost of owning a boat.
I'm glad you're so civic minded! 8^) To some extent, most people would
probably agree with you. It's when those taxes become exhorbitant and
the money wasted that most people object and try to avoid the tax. Case
in point, the user "fee", luxury tax, and massive increase in Mass excise
tax. Even the user fee probably would have been met with open arms if
people actually saw an improvement in access and services for their money.
Rick
|
16.96 | Render unto Ceas | TNPUBS::WASIEJKO | Retired CPO | Thu Apr 22 1993 00:42 | 37 |
| RE: the last few notes
Mass assesses a 5% sales tax on boats. If you buy out of state and
that other state is your principal state of use, you are generally
exempt, particularly if you are not a Mass resident. If you later
decide to use the boat in Mass, the 5% becomes due on demand. A Mass
resident who buys a boat in Mass pays the tax, period.
The waterway use tax is an excise tax levied by the town in which
the boat is principally used or moored. The town, not Mass., gets
the exicise (use) tax, which is usually $50 to $150 per year, based on
a percentage of the boat's current value. My 1986 25-footer costs
about $75 the first year and is now down to $50 annually. I have never
felt that I got a return on that money in the form of improved
waterways or services.
I have NH numbers, but eventually leased a slip in Mass., thus I paid
the 5% sales tax the second year, after the towm of Amesbury listed my
boat as residing at an Amesbury marina for the season. The report
comes from the local hrbormaster who gets the names of owners from the
marinas each year. I also paid penalties and was also assessed interest,
which was later waived by the State. All this came about because I am
a resident of NH, bought the boat in Mass (no tax), moored in NH the
first year then moved the boat to Mass. I have no qualms - render unto
to Ceaser . . .
I kept the NH numbers from the Coast Guard because at the time NH was
not reciprocal and I used the boat on NH lakes a couple of weeks each
year. When NH finally did reciprocate, NH adopted my Coast Guard
numbers by adding a NH sticker annually for the price of a NH user fee.
Everyone seems to have a different story to tell, but the bottom line
is pay if you owe and avoid the hassle & penalties.
Happy 1993 boating season shipmates.
-mike-
|
16.97 | | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Thu Apr 22 1993 10:02 | 19 |
| re .94:
I thought that this was a notesfile about boating, not one for
complaining about how our governments works and whether or not this or
that tax is unfair.
re .95:
You are confusing two different taxes. The sales tax is a sales and use
tax. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts sent me a copy of the tax law
when they billed me for the sales tax I owed (several thousand dollars)
many years ago.
The annual excise tax is a separate tax that is paid to the town in
which the boat is habitually kept during the summer. In Marblehead,
where I have a mooring, you cannot get a mooring permit without proving
you've paid the tax.
|
16.98 | Have you read "1984"? | GOLF::WILSON | Think Spring! | Thu Apr 22 1993 16:07 | 13 |
| re: Note 16.97 by UNIFIX::BERENS
>> re .94:
>> I thought that this was a notesfile about boating, not one for
>> complaining about how our governments works and whether or not this or
>> that tax is unfair.
As you pointed out, taxes ARE a part of boating. Last time I checked
however, Jeff was just as free to comment on what he sees as unfair or
excessive boat taxes as you were to suggest in reply .89 that people
should just "shrug and pay".
Rick
|
16.99 | Taxes | SALEM::GILMAN | | Fri Apr 23 1993 12:45 | 17 |
| .97 Thought this was about boats not taxes....
The header on this string says taxes, right? And its in the context
of a boating notesfile, right? My comments were in regard to taxes and
boats, what is inappropriate about that?
Since boating is sort of a luxury, (not vital to ones' survival unless
your in the business earning a living), I suppose I shouldn't complain
about taxes on a luxury I enjoy. But my points still stand regarding
taxes in general. Why was it the U.S. split off from Britain? Some
thing to do with tea ships in Boston Harbor and taxes, right? (Prior
comment not a rat hole because it involves taxes and marine
watercraft).
Smile
Jeff
|
16.100 | no tax, no penalty | PROXY::TAYLOR | | Tue Apr 27 1993 09:04 | 13 |
|
I am a Mass. resident, bought, registered and stored a boat in
NH for the last year and never paid a Mass. sales tax, my mailing
address was to Mass.
I sold my cottage and decided it best to to register the boat
in Mass.. Since I registered the boat out of state for at least
six months, I did not have to pay a fee or penalty. All I needed
to do was state in writing that the boat was never used or stored
in Mass. for that time.
I can buy a lot of gas for $800+. ;{).
|