T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
9.1 | What do they NEED? FDDI or Ethernet? | DACT19::PDORNAN | Patrick Dornan, NWSS 8-339-7169 | Tue Nov 28 1989 15:58 | 11 |
| Something I saw while a Sales Rep, and now even more since I
transferred to NWSS is that many customers with no network, or very
small Ethernets with little bandwidth utilization, are DYING for
FDDI. When? How Much? How? They don't NEED it. But they think
they HAVE to HAVE it!
They come to DEC, expecting us to be the leader, and rightly so.
I tell them to wait for standards, and to take a hard look at their
needs.
Patrick
|
9.2 | | KONING::KONING | NI1D @FN42eq | Wed Nov 29 1989 18:09 | 8 |
| "Look at your needs" sounds like a good message. "Wait for standards" may
not be, it depends on what you and they think that means. The FDDI standard
is not yet fully complete, yet producs from other vendors are available
today, and ours will definitely be on the market before the standard is
"officially done". Be careful you don't make the customer think our products
are farther off than they really are!
paul
|
9.3 | and IBM ? | NCEIS1::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux, Nice, 828-6995 | Fri Dec 01 1989 05:47 | 8 |
| One thing I'm trying to find out is how much FDDI info are customers
getting from the industry. I'm aware of Fibronics.
Now, what about IBM ? are they "selling" FDDI to their customers,
prospects, ... ?
This question tends to be an important one since most customers
have DEC and IBM (and ...) systems installed.
|
9.4 | What one large customer wants! | DWOVAX::LICAUSE | Al Licause | Tue Jan 09 1990 09:48 | 12 |
| Please take a look at note 24 in this conference to see some of what
one of our large customers wants to do with FDDI!
They are looking to us to help with suggestions and design; also to
make sure they don't do anything radically wrong.
In addition, this customer will be looking at FDDI to link scientific
graphic work stations directly to their Cray to receive higher speed
displays, if that is possible.
Al
|
9.5 | Faster is normally better. | CUJO::MEIER | Systems Engineering Resident... | Sat Feb 03 1990 22:17 | 19 |
|
Here's one customers ideas of what FDDI will bring to there
systems.
1) High Speed Network Backbone, to connect 40+ Ethernet segments
to prevent BACKBONE overload.
2) High speed network that will allow workstations to view data
at many times Ethernet rates
3) Better / more control over where packets go and who is sending
them.
4) Added redundancy in the network backbone.
5) A possible replacement to NSC Hyperchannel.
AL
|
9.6 | | KONING::KONING | NI1D @FN42eq | Mon Feb 05 1990 12:48 | 3 |
| Could you elaborate on (3)?
paul
|
9.7 | where should the packets go. | CUJO::MEIER | Systems Engineering Resident... | Tue Feb 06 1990 07:44 | 7 |
|
Able to limit where packets are sent, and which protocols are
encapulated and transmitted to other stations.
With many segments, only some data needs global distribution.
|
9.8 | | KONING::KONING | NI1D @FN42eq | Tue Feb 06 1990 11:10 | 3 |
| Ok... that's a bridge function, perhaps. It certainly isn't tied to FDDI.
paul
|