[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::dcu

Title:DCU
Notice:1996 BoD Election results in 1004
Moderator:CPEEDY::BRADLEY
Created:Sat Feb 07 1987
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1041
Total number of notes:18759

680.0. "Discussion of June 25, 1993 BoD Minutes" by ASE003::GRANSEWICZ () Tue Jul 20 1993 01:50

    This note is reserved for the discussion of the June 25, 1993 BoD meeting.
    The minutes are posted in note 2.16.  All Board minutes notes and
    discussions have been keyworded BOARD_MINUTES.
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
680.1GSFSYS::MACDONALDFri Aug 06 1993 10:4615
    
    
    Re: financials section
    
    *We* are making money hand over fist at it seems about twice the
    rate that was expected.  It seems that the DCU is doing quite well
    and recovering from the Mangone debacle at a good rate.
    
    Why is Chuck Cockburn beating us with the "relationship" issue in
    the last Network by focusing on certain accts?  Exactly what agenda
    is being worked?
    
    Steve
    
    
680.2ECADSR::SHERMANSteve ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 MLO5-2/26aFri Aug 06 1993 15:4215
    According to my understanding of what he's saying in the June Network,
    the DCU exists to "save and to obtain loans ..."  Chuck emphasizes this
    throughout the memo.  This is apparently the direction that is being
    pushed.  To me, it sounds like they plan to introduce fees to checking
    in the next few months.  
    
    I don't like how the memo made it sound like DCU lost of $2M with an 
    emphasis on it being a non-profit organization.  This makes it sound 
    like DCU had a net loss of $2M and is going to introduce fees so that 
    it can break even.  That implication is simply not true.  I also don't
    like the idea that I don't have a "relationship" with DCU if I only
    have low-balance accounts.  The implied message is that I'm scum.
    Yup.  That'll really make me want to approach DCU for a car loan.
    
    Steve
680.3Another CU's definition of "relationship"MUDHWK::LAWLERStress, Silicon and SoftwareFri Aug 06 1993 19:2537
    
    
      This must be "relationship month" for credit unions.
    
      The following appeared in the latest issue of the Navy Federal
    Credit Union's monthly equivalent of "Network".  It is interesting
    both in the picture it gives of NFCU's definition of "relationship"
    as well as in the way they go about it...
    
    
    "   BE SURE YOU MEET BALANCE REQUIREMENTS"  (Which I've never heard
    	 						of before --al)
    
      "All it took to open your Navy Federal share savings account 
       was the purchase of one $5 share.  With the privelege of lifetime
       (NFCU) membership comes the responsibility of actively using
        your credit union.  So we ask adule members to keep a minimum
        $50 balance in their share savings within any given six-month
    	period,  unless they also have active IRA's,  or active
    	Certificate,  Sharechek (checking --al) and/or loan accounts. 
    	Letters are sent out every April and ctober reminding those
    	members who need to increase their share savings balances or
    	take advantage of other NFCU services."
    
    I have no idea what happens if you dip below the $50,  since
    if only $50 is considered a "relationship",  my balance is approaching
    true love...  :^)
    
    Since the new board has been elected, (Along with the increased
    awareness of credit union finances etc.)  I've made an attempt
    to increase my dcu balance from its previously abysmal level,  
    but it would be nice if chuck were to meet me half way with something
    less than his previously hinted at $3500...
    
    
    						-al
    
680.4Relationship *->BANKING<-*ASE003::GRANSEWICZSun Aug 08 1993 13:3711
    
    Could somebody please explain to me how this way of doing business
    ("relationship banking") is any different than the way banks are doing
    business?  Or have credit unions been taken over by bankers that are
    driven by the bottom line only?  I am beginning to see why banks are
    jumping up and down about CUs not paying taxes.
    
    Al, from the sounds it Navy is heading down the relationship banking path.
    Please give them a call and see what the penalties are as well as any
    other minimum balances you may not be aware of.
    
680.5MUDHWK::LAWLERStress, Silicon and SoftwareMon Aug 09 1993 08:337
    
    
      Will do...
    
    
    					-al
    
680.6GSFSYS::MACDONALDTue Aug 10 1993 09:5415
    
    Re: .4
    
    > Could somebody please explain to me how this way of doing business
    > ("relationship banking") is any different than the way banks are doing
    > business?  Or have credit unions been taken over by bankers that are
    > driven by the bottom line only?  
    
    If so then it's time to tell the bankers that they are NOT welcome.
    THIS IS OUR CREDIT UNION EXISTING FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF MEETING OUR
    NEEDS AND INTERESTS!  How many times do we have to say it before
    they get it?
    
    Steve