T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
488.1 | Nothing new, nothing too much to worry about | CVG::THOMPSON | DCU Board of Directors Candidate | Mon Mar 09 1992 15:37 | 7 |
| I've heard about the mail message but not seen it. I have seen the
report it referes to however. It has some unfavorable things to say
about the DCU but doesn't say it's about to fold. It is is mostly
critical of the costs of running the DCU and some asset to earnings
ratios. I do not know how up to date their information was though.
Alfred
|
488.2 | Careful with those rumours out there... | AOSG::GILLETT | Petition candidate for DCU BoD | Mon Mar 09 1992 15:45 | 23 |
| I would counsel caution in the extreme with regard to this report.
I've seen the report mentioned in .0, and it is basically a study
of the various ratios that are used in determining fiscal strength.
As is well known, DCU has taken some hits on the write down of the
participation loans, and so our ratios aren't very good right now.
If you've been to Chuck Cockburn's informational meetings last
year, you heard him talk at length about his plans to improve these
ratios.
The report says that there is a higher incidence of failure among
credit unions with numbers in our range. It DOES **NOT** SAY that
"DCU is in such bad shape that it has a high likelihood of failure."
This report is simply a statistical study - it is not a detailed
investigation of DCU, or even a thorough probing.
DCU may have it's problems, but it is strong. DCU is NOT going to
fail. Period. While I am often very critical of DCU's BoD, I do
not fear, nor should you, for the future of DCU.
Please, let's be careful with rumours like this. DCU, and especially
DCU's shareholders, do not need a run on the bank.
|
488.3 | Nothing we didn't already know | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | Vote for DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Mar 09 1992 15:45 | 14 |
|
RE: .0
Yes, I have seen and read the report. It really states nothing new.
Their analysis' are based on ratios. And we certainly already knew
DCU's ratios have suffered because of the loan losses.
But I would say DCU doesn't have a high likely hood of failure unless
people panic (which could cause ANY institution to collapse) or DCU
makes another major mistake which causes further loss.
So let's just hang in there and get DCU back up and running like it was
in its early years.
|
488.4 | Thank you for the explanation! | DEMON::INGALLS | | Tue Mar 10 1992 07:48 | 9 |
| Because this type of rumor can be so harmful, I entered it in this
Notesfile for clarification. Since the rumor mongers are sure to
spread this, perhaps the DCU should acknowledge the rumor and state
the FACTS!
Thanks for the information.
Gail
|
488.5 | I couldn't agree more! | DEMON::INGALLS | | Tue Mar 10 1992 07:51 | 7 |
| RE: .3
That was my 1st thought - instead of a run, what can we do to SAVE
the DCU, if this rumor is, in fact, true.
G
|
488.7 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Tue Mar 10 1992 10:55 | 4 |
| Re: .-1
I'm sure Mr. Glover would be as diligent in repsonding to that as he
was to 450.0. :-)
|
488.8 | Yeah, that's the ticket | MLTVAX::SCONCE | Bill Sconce | Wed Mar 11 1992 09:13 | 12 |
| .5> That was my 1st thought - instead of a run, what can we do to SAVE
.5> the DCU, if this rumor is, in fact, true.
Vote...
|
488.9 | I say we should stay put... | ERLANG::MILLEVILLE | | Wed Mar 11 1992 12:31 | 16 |
| .5> That was my 1st thought - instead of a run, what can we do to SAVE
.5> the DCU, if this rumor is, in fact, true.
We can also plan to NOT desert the DCU as many have elected to do in pulling
out their money. I have noticed no change in the status of the funds in my
three accounts other than the interest rates have gone down. The service from
the tellers here at LKG is just fine. If I hadn't heard about the Mangone
affair, I would have attributed 100% of the low rates to the current economic
conditions. Now I know a part of it has been their losses.
The bottom line is that ANY business CANNOT survive if its customer base deserts
it, even when they ARE in a bona fide CORRECT process of correcting the pro-
blems. Some people have chosen to take their funds elsewhere, and they do
indeed have that right. Under the current economic conditions, they may find
themselves bank-hopping again and again anyway. But as long as the funds are
NOT in danger, I say we should stay put.
|