T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
161.1 | I don't agree | ARGUS::BISSELL | | Tue Mar 21 1989 13:51 | 7 |
| Keeping additional cash on hand to cash checks for non-members costs money
which will result in higher costs for members to borrow or less interest
on the money which we invest. I personaly do not choose to subsidize
non-members and would object if the DCU did what you propose.
Seldom have we seen proposals such as yours which benefit the non-member
at the expense of the member.
|
161.2 | On the surface | VMSSPT::BUDA | Putsing along... | Tue Mar 21 1989 17:10 | 13 |
| >Seldom have we seen proposals such as yours which benefit the non-member
>at the expense of the member.
DCU has one major problem. Many of the members and non-members do not
think highly of it. To change this, DCU needs to become customer
orientied. To get that non-member to become a member, you have to be
pro-active. DCU already does this with kick-backs on certain loans.
DCU needs to act like a many banks to do customers - treat them as a
valued customer.
- mark
|
161.3 | | ARGUS::BISSELL | | Wed Mar 22 1989 12:44 | 20 |
| As one who is in the Customer Service Business, I agree that the DCU should
present a good face to customers and potential customers.
I have had complaints about them and their service in the past and have made
it a point to bring thse complaints to management EVERY TIME.
I complained about the amount of time to process a loan and the next time
was much more prompt. I complained about the lateness of the statement and
that has been fixed now.
I requested a Cashiers Check and was told by the Clerk that they did not do
them for that amount. The manager explained why (you don't really need one)
but agreed to give (sell) me one with no problem.
Many complaints in this file are about lack of consistency between
branches and even between clerks in the same branch. This is a result of
lack of training and supervision and high turnover.
Should you want to experience really bad manners, rude treatment, etc
then visit the Shawmut Bank in Maynard.
|
161.4 | Why Not Proactive Customer Satisfaction? | FOOZLE::GOSSELIN | Ken...AET1-2/8...240-6570 | Wed Mar 22 1989 14:48 | 16 |
| RE: .2
I believe that the point .2 was trying to make is that it shouldn't
be necessary to complain about poor service - DCU should be proactive
in identifying and PREVENTING dissatisfiers from becoming customer
complaints.
I agree that management plays the major role in supervision, policy,
and training. As for the Shawmut Bank in Maynard - just because
this bank is perceived as poorer in customer satisfaction that DCU
does not make DCU better by comparison.
Ken
|
161.5 | Misnumbered | FOOZLE::GOSSELIN | Ken...AET1-2/8...240-6570 | Wed Mar 22 1989 14:51 | 6 |
| Oops....previous note is RE:.3............
Ken
|
161.6 | DCU shots itself in the foot again... | DPDMAI::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Thu Mar 23 1989 09:28 | 9 |
| re: .1
That is another one of DCU's weird policies. I've never had any
problem cashing travelers checks at any bank, savings and loan,
etc. as long as I had proper identification and endorsed them in
view of the teller. Most hotels will cash them up to a certain
limit, for registered guests.
Bob
|
161.7 | DCU isn't meant to be a full service bank | ATSE::BLOCK | Hey, today is part of reality, too! | Mon Mar 27 1989 13:23 | 10 |
|
I agree with .1; most DCU branches are much smaller than the average
bank branch; keeping an extra few thousand dollars on hand to service
non-customers doesn't make a lot of sense. I wouldn't object to
having them charge a fee for services provided to non-members; most
banks charge non-members.
None of this excuses rudeness under any circumstances.
Beverly
|
161.8 | These are travellers checks, not personal checks | ABSZK::GREENWOOD | Tim. Asian Base-Systems | Thu Mar 30 1989 13:00 | 12 |
| Several years ago I had the same problem as that recounted in .0 DCU would not
cash an American Express US currency travellers check. Most places, including
all other banks and most shops take these as though they were cash. It is
very unprofessional of DCU not to cash them. If a non member asked them to
change a $10 bill to singles would they refuse that as well?
Contrary to the view expressed in .1 and .7 we are not talking about keeping
an extra few thousand dollars on hand to cash personal checks from non members.
We are talking about a very small service, that is standard everywhere else I
have tried.
Tim
|
161.9 | No problem recently | ULTRA::KINDEL | Bill Kindel @ BXB1 | Thu Mar 30 1989 13:43 | 6 |
| Re .8:
I cashed several Citicorp Traveller's Cheques at the CXO office earlier
this month without difficulty. There's no reason AMEX traveller's
cheques should be treated any differently. (I'd expect the converse;
which outfit do you imagine is better-known for traveller's cheques?)
|
161.10 | no problem, with an account | VAXRT::WILLIAMS | | Thu Mar 30 1989 14:07 | 11 |
| Whenever I cach traveller's checks at DCU they always check my account
(maybe just for existance?)
The ones issued by petty cash (Citibank?) and AMEX are all treated
the same in Maynard by DCU.
Some commercial banks won't cash traveller's checks for non account
holders (COMFED Pepperell branch, for instance).
/s/ Jim Williams
|
161.11 | Always thought this was SOP | AYNRND::REILLY | Get outta here, you hockey puck! | Thu Mar 30 1989 17:58 | 7 |
|
When I travelled across the country on bicycle, I *counted* on
banks cashing my traveller's checks - no way would I carry cash
From Boston to LA, not one bank refused (and I used many).
- Sean
|
161.12 | | CECV01::STRATTON | I (heart) my husband | Mon Apr 03 1989 20:12 | 12 |
| re: .10
Besides checking for account existance, the reason why the teller runs a
travelers (or any other check) throught the system is for tracking. If
a teller is off balance at the end of the day, she or he can run a
detailed report of every transaction processed during that day. It is
possible that a teller cashed out a check and did not run it through
the system. (I've done this a few times myself, you learn after
you've had to run this report a couple of times)
Roberta
|