T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
11.1 | >officially UNOFFICIAL< | CEDARS::SYSTEM | | Sat Feb 07 1987 15:08 | 17 |
|
RE -1: No this notes files is *NOT* sponsored by DCU.
This notesfile was established due to requests from unhappy DCU
members (mainly in Tewksbury) who are having lots of problems with
the credit union. This is only a forum to talk about these problems,
and share information, and my personal feeling: if there are enough
members having problems, that maybe the noters could consolidate their
efforts to do something about it. But as I said, this is my personal
opinion as a noter, and not as a moderator. (that means I am not
involved in anything besides moderating this file..)
I hope this offers some clarification.
Nisreen
|
11.74 | Would *you* choose the DCU? | JANUS::FRASER | Sandy's Andy. | Sat Feb 07 1987 16:09 | 22 |
|
Hi,
I will be moving to the US. in a couple of months to take
up residence, marrying a DEC employee, and continuing to work
for DEC in the US.
I have only a superficial amount of knowledge about the DCU,
and from what I've seen in other conferences, opinion seems
to be divided as to whether the service they provide is good
or bad.
I would welcome opinions as to what *you* as DCU users would
do, given that you were new to the 'system', and had the
choice of any bank to begin with.
I will be looking for a mortgage, and would like a dual
signature (joint) checking account, along with a savings
account.
Thanks,
Andy
|
11.102 | Lucky or a bug? | TOOK::HEFFERNAN | Insist on yourself;never imitate | Sat Feb 07 1987 16:35 | 9 |
|
The last two times I have changed the amount of my share draft,
subsequent automatic deposits go into my primary account. I complained
the first time (I guess to no avail). Is this a bug or I am just
lucky? I am going to go in Monday and ask to speak to a manager
and see if I can get it fixed...
John
|
11.75 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Sat Feb 07 1987 23:38 | 8 |
| There is no good reason *not* to have an account with the DCU, since membership
is free and checking is free.
That said, I would not want it to be my primary bank. It's handy that DEC
lets you have your check deposited into a commercial bank with part of the
check going into DCU as well.
/john
|
11.2 | Call the DCU (8-223-6735) | EXIT26::STRATTON | Notes in White Satin | Sun Feb 08 1987 11:39 | 11 |
| While I can appreciate the intent of this conference, if
you have a problem or concern with the DCU, chances are
this conference won't help.
If you have a problem with the DCU, talk to someone at
your local branch. If that doesn't help, call either John
Tilley or Donna Lane Nelson at DTN 223-6735 (between 9:00
and 5:00 pm, Eastern time).
Jim Stratton (married to a DCU employee)
|
11.3 | Is this conference for internal use only? | EXIT26::STRATTON | Notes in White Satin | Sun Feb 08 1987 11:44 | 11 |
| Is this conference "for internal use only"? The DCU is
NOT "part" of Digital. Its employees are NOT Digital
employees.
In other words, may I show notes here to my wife, who is
a DCU and not a Digital employee? Or may I (or someone)
periodically EXTRACT notes from this conference and give
them to DCU employees (probably John Tilley; see .2)?
Jim Stratton
|
11.76 | One reason not to... | VAXWRK::NORDLINGER | There's no notes like good notes | Sun Feb 08 1987 17:38 | 18 |
| There is a real good reason for not using the DCU for checking.
>Flame ON!
The DCU does not provide cancelled checks. If a company, lets say
American Express loses a check, the only way to convince them of
the transaction, even if they cashed the check, is to provide a
photo copy of the cancelled check.
Good luck getting the cancelled check. If AE screws up and you need
to get proof, you better have you books to get the check number and
then you get to hunt down the DCU to dig up the check.
>Flame OFF
I look forward to a seperate note in regards to this topic as this
is not the place to argue this point but rather to list reasons
PRO/CON for the DCU.
|
11.4 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Sun Feb 08 1987 19:14 | 13 |
| The information in this conference, just like any other conference on the
EASYNET, follows the standard "do the right thing" rules as everything at
DEC.
If a note in this conference does not contain proprietary information
about DEC's products or operations and does not shed DEC in a bad light,
it may be shown to anyone, DEC employee or not.
/john
P.S.: DCU Trustees, by the way, are DEC employees and can read and write
in this conference, if they want. It wouldn't be a bad idea -- it would
let us know who we're voting for.
|
11.5 | | EXIT26::STRATTON | Notes in White Satin | Sun Feb 08 1987 22:10 | 9 |
| John - while I agree with your "do the right thing" rules,
I'd like to hear the moderator make that statement.
Re DCU's board of directors - I'll track down the names
and post them here. At least one of them has used Notes,
that I'm aware of.
Jim Stratton
|
11.6 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Sun Feb 08 1987 23:41 | 11 |
| > John - while I agree with your "do the right thing" rules,
> I'd like to hear the moderator make that statement.
What someone does with the notes posted in this conference is really none
of the moderator's business -- whether something is/isn't "for internal use
only" is not decided by the moderator; it is determined by the content of
the note. Likewise presence or absent of a "for internal use only" notice
on a note or other document isn't the determining factor. Such notices are
only advisory.
/john
|
11.77 | A satisfied member. | REGENT::EPSTEIN | Bruce Epstein | Mon Feb 09 1987 08:55 | 25 |
| DCU accounts may serve several purposes; the trick, as
with any resource, is using it in the best way.
DCU wins hands down for convenience: if you will be working
in a facility with an office, it's the easiest way to have
access to cash (of course, that may not be advisable for some
people :-).
DCU also pays the highest interest for the lowest
minimum balance, at least in this state (MA).
I continue to maintain another checking account at a
Savings Bank (stay away from Commercial Banks if you can)
so that I don't have to pay for using an ATM (which I do often,
and I don't *live* near any DCU ATMs).
My home mortgage is through DCU, for convenience and lower
interest. The process was not very smooth, but I've heard horror
stories with just about all mortgage sources.
I've had "no checks returned" accounts before coming to DCU; I've never
needed a cancelled check (and that includes the "checks returned"
accounts, too). Maybe I'm just lucky.
Bruce
|
11.103 | | HULK::ROSS | Border guard at the bad taste boundary | Mon Feb 09 1987 11:27 | 12 |
| I believe it is related to the information about changes in
deductions being delayed between DEC Payroll and DCU. The last time
I changed my split of DCU deductions (between primary, checking, xmas,
and vacation), DCU ended up with more of my money than they were
expecting. They just deposit the excess in the primary account and
don't tell a soul. It can be very frustrating when you see the money
come out of your check one week and assume it is being deposited in the
checking account that week, and find out later that it did not happen
until the next week.
After the last escapade I closed my checking account and moved it to
a real bank. I still maintain my savings accounts with DCU.
|
11.104 | Sigh | TOOK::HEFFERNAN | Insist on yourself;never imitate | Mon Feb 09 1987 11:48 | 7 |
| RE: .-1
Yes, that's what they told me today. It has to do with a time lag
in *THE SYSTEM*. They said you can call to transfer the funds back
to checking. Sigh...
John
|
11.105 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon Feb 09 1987 13:23 | 15 |
| >They said you can call to transfer the funds back to checking.
You can even call Easy-Touch to find out what happened and transfer it.
But this is a crock in their implementation that assumes that you want
money put into your "primary" account even though checking is what most
people using DCU as their main bank would consider their "primary" account.
Hmmm... I wonder if you could get DEC to do direct deposit into your DCU
checking account the same way it does it to other banks, via the ACH.
Then only your specified Credit Union deduction would go through the
system with this bug.
/john
|
11.114 | Is DCU really competative? | MREASY::CROWLEY | til the echoes ring again!!! | Mon Feb 09 1987 16:06 | 20 |
| Having been a DCU member for only about 18 months, I have noticed
that the interest rates (both borrowing and saving) are in many
cases not competative with the rest of the banking world. Many
have informed me that at one time DCU was very competative and in
many cases had better rates than most savings institutions.
If DCU was better in the past then what happened? Will it continue
to use non-competative rates and hope that the convenience factor
will keep the DCU in business?
Case in point, I was recently looking for a Home Equity loan. DCU
puts out a brochure about how great their rates are for a Home Equity
loan. 9.5% and several hundred dollars to close. Next I pick up
the newspaper and find several banks who will provide a Home Equity
Loan for 1% over prime (prime is currently 7.5%) and NO closing
costs.
Does anybody else feel that DCU is missing the boat, not only with
Home Equity but car loans, Certificates of Deposit? What do you
thing about DCU in comparison with the rest of the market place?
|
11.106 | you get what you pay for, and you don't get to pay for it... | COOKIE::KRANTZ | | Mon Feb 09 1987 16:18 | 18 |
| I once got a believeable (although not good) explanation of
how payroll deductions 'work'; it goes as follows:
DCU gets your money from payroll (how much, depends on payroll and
nothing else, so the for you file with DCU affects their records
and payrolls...)
DCU has a list of $'s and accounts you want that money placed
in.
They go down the list, placing the dollar amount in each account
as long as there are dollars and entries left.
If they run out of entries and have dollars left, they go
in the last/main account.
If they run out of dollars first, they stop... no errors
warnings etc...
Joe
|
11.115 | Apples and oranges? | JON::MORONEY | Legalize Liberty | Mon Feb 09 1987 23:29 | 13 |
| > Case in point, I was recently looking for a Home Equity loan. DCU
> puts out a brochure about how great their rates are for a Home Equity
> loan. 9.5% and several hundred dollars to close. Next I pick up
> the newspaper and find several banks who will provide a Home Equity
> Loan for 1% over prime (prime is currently 7.5%) and NO closing
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> costs.
Be sure you are comparing the same thing. Is the DCU mortgage a fixed rate?
The other one sounds like a variable rate. Variable rate mortgages are lower
than fixed everywhere - even from the same bank.
-Mike
|
11.78 | | FRANKY::CURTIS | Dick 'Aristotle' Curtis | Tue Feb 10 1987 08:05 | 8 |
| I would concur with .3, partly because for a while I lived across
the street from a DCU ATM. Now that they've cut over to the VAX,
the ATMs have been reliable (for the several months before that,
the hours that they seemed to be working seemed to be solely the
hours that the offices were open!).
Dick
|
11.107 | Slopware? Sleazeware? | FRANKY::CURTIS | Dick 'Aristotle' Curtis | Tue Feb 10 1987 08:11 | 8 |
| .4:
Who wrote this slopware? Two three-year-olds with Crayolas?
Seriously, if you didn't make a mistake, they did.
Dick
|
11.144 | METPAY | HYDRA::LEMIEUX | | Tue Feb 10 1987 11:13 | 7 |
| Can somebody give me some general info on Home Insurance and why
I should or should not use METPAY ?
Thanks,
Kevin
|
11.108 | they let those who can write cash checks! | COOKIE::KRANTZ | | Tue Feb 10 1987 11:29 | 10 |
| re: .5 - seriously... it is even somewhat 'predictable'... DCU
and payroll update their databases at separate times. DCU has
no direct control over you deductions so they disperse what
payroll gives them.
This happens EVERY time I (and several others here in Colorado)
change our deductions. Perhaps it is accentuated by the
distance from the main offices...
Joe
|
11.79 | | SCOTTY::BAKERMAN | Interchangeable parts don't | Tue Feb 10 1987 11:39 | 8 |
| One thing you didn't mention is where you are going to be moving
to. Each state has its own rules regarding banking. I'm satisfied
with DCU, but the only things I do with them are checking and (used
to have) auto loans. I've never in my life needed a copy of a
cancelled check, so I don't mind not having them.
But, as with anything else, you really should shop around, yes,
even for a bank. Rates and service charges vary widely.
|
11.80 | I find the DCU meets my needs | FURILO::BLINN | Let's do the `Time Warp' again | Tue Feb 10 1987 11:50 | 25 |
| I *did* choose the DCU, and I've never been unhappy with the
services they've provided me. I've only had one snafu in the
three years I've been banking with them, and that was quickly
and amicably resolved. (They debited a check twice; when I
brought it to their attention, they credited my account for
the error. This could (and does) happen with ANY bank.)
I work in Marlboro, where there is a DCU office (in MRO1) as
well as an ATM (in MRO3, where I work). I sometimes use an
ATM that's part of one of the commercial networks; DCU is in
several major networks, and they subsidize the costs.
I've never needed a "returned check" from the DCU; if I had
regular problems with anyone (e.g., American Express) incorrectly
crediting my payments, I'd quit using their service. That's not a
real problem with the DCU, anyway; the standard checks have
"carbonless copies" and are printed with sequential numbers, so
it's difficult to lose track of what checks you've written to
whom, and what the numbers were. The administrative cost is
reduced, and the savings are passed back to DCU members in the
form of share dividends.
Would I do it again? Sure. My experience has been good.
Tom
|
11.116 | As lender, I want maximum return on investment | FURILO::BLINN | Let's do the `Time Warp' again | Tue Feb 10 1987 12:03 | 15 |
| As long as the DCU can loan out all the money it's got to loan, I
(as the person who gets the interest you pay) would just as soon
they weren't offering the lowest rate. If they give you (the
borrower) a lower rate, that means they pay me (the lender) less
in interest. They're in business to make a profit for the share
holders, i.e., those with share draft accounts.
If you have money in the DCU, and are getting a home equity loan
anyway (instead of simply withdrawing your savings and using them
instead), you're earning back part of what you pay the DCU in
interest as interest on your savings. When you borrow elsewhere,
you're not getting a "rebate". If you factor this in, you might
decide that the DCU's rate really is better.
Tom
|
11.145 | This is not the METPAY conference | FURILO::BLINN | Let's do the `Time Warp' again | Tue Feb 10 1987 12:05 | 5 |
| Kevin, this is the DCU conference, not the METPAY conference.
Your question might better be asked in USSCSL::ASKENET or in
DELNI::CONSUMER.
Tom
|
11.146 | It is DCU related | CHOPIN::LEMIEUX | | Tue Feb 10 1987 12:27 | 6 |
| When you get your committment letter from the DCU, they suggest
the possibility of METPAY, so I see it as DCU related. I'd be
interested in hearing from other folks that have had to make the
decision to go with METPAY or some other home insurance.
Kevin
|
11.147 | | CEDARS::SYSTEM | | Tue Feb 10 1987 13:18 | 12 |
|
This topic will be restricted to discuss DCU recommendation of METPAY,
and not discussing preference in insurance. That is the only way
you can keep it DCU related. Once you start comparing insurance
companies it is no longer DCU related, and the discussion will be
closed.
Nisreen
|
11.117 | | MREASY::CROWLEY | til the echoes ring again!!! | Tue Feb 10 1987 13:23 | 22 |
| Re: .1
Mike,
I thought that all of the currently offered Home Equity loans offered
by various lending institutions ONLY offered variable. DCU is no
exception.
Do you know of a bank/lending institution who will write a fixed
rate home equity loan?
re: .2
Tom,
I am currently have both a savings and a checking account with DCU
but I still plan on getting the best deal whether that be with DCU
or not. I would prefer to do more business with DCU but not if
I can save some money by going elsewhere.
pjc
|
11.148 | The link between METPAY and DCU. | REGENT::EPSTEIN | Bruce Epstein | Wed Feb 11 1987 08:41 | 9 |
| METPAY is the only insurance company/program accepted by DCU
(well, actually BancBoston Mortgage Co.) to avoid the requirement
for insurance payments to be escrowed.
It is up to the individual to decide if this, and the 5% (?)
discount of METPAY are significant factors in the choice of
home insurance.
Bruce (mortgage through DCU, insurance by METPAY)
|
11.118 | a borrower and lender be | PULSAR::WALLY | Wally Neilsen-Steinhardt | Wed Feb 11 1987 12:48 | 13 |
| As both a borrower and lender, I want good rates on both ends.
Impossible you say? Not at all.
All DCU has to do is keep the middle (overhead, loan losses,
transaction costs, and so forth) to a minimum. Then they can give
better than average rates on both ends.
Credit unions start with a few advantages: favorable tax and regulatory
treatment, no true stockholders demanding their cut, a fairly
homogeneous debtor and depositor base, convenience in dealing primarily
with a single payroll system. The rest is just good management,
which is not easy, as we all know who have tried it.
|
11.149 | DCU/METPAY | FDCV19::DARROW | | Thu Feb 12 1987 09:18 | 29 |
| -< Must not have been awake. >-
Have been with METPAY since they replaced Liberty Mutual.
Have been with DCU since a month or so of its birth.
Have a 'Line of Credit' with DCU.
Have had a 'PC' loan with DCU.
Was not aware that METPAY was required, but with all the other details
invloved in obtaining a 'second mortgage', it may have got by me.
Observations:
No problems with DCU. (of course I sit on the second floor of PKO3
on the Parker Steet end and can see DCU headquarters form my desk.
but I have never had to 'storm' over there. It just made it convienient
when we 'closed' on the line of credit.
No problems with METPAY, infact when I went in to identify the fact
that my new car had come equipped with an anti theft device, I
quickly had my premium reduced and was given a credit retroactive
to the purchase of the car. (10 months prior) Again I have the
convience of a 5 day a week METPAY office just down a flight of
stairs.
Fred 223-3935
|
11.119 | up against the wall, DCU | PSTJTT::TABER | omnia mutantur nos et mutamur in illis | Thu Feb 12 1987 15:35 | 33 |
| Re: .2
You don't really think you're getting the benefit of the DCU's
high rates, do you? I've been with the DCU since it opened for the sake
of being able to get money at work. I've NEVER seen the DCU offer
competitive rates on loans. (Which is why there are Credit Unions. they
weren't created to feed the fat cats with high interest.)
Before there was a DCU, DEC (Maynard) used to deal with Worker's Credit
Union in Fitchburg, MA. When the DCU came along, not only did DEC change
its business away, promising they'd be able to give the employees a
better deal, but they rigged payroll deduction so you could no longer
have your money sent to Worker's even if you wanted to! Worker's still
offers a better rate than DCU and approves loans OVER THE PHONE!
I'm not sure how the interest payment rates compare, but I've always
been able to beat DCU's rates on instruments, so I assume it can be beat
on accounts as well.
The other thing that always bothered me, back when I cared was that when
a surplus was declared, it was never be generally distributed to the
shareholders (you know why your buckies are called "shares" right?) It
would get distributed to shareholders who kept one account or another
over a certain amount. The one I remember was where you needed an
average account balance for the year of $500. In those days I was just
able to live check to check: I should funnel my money into the DCU so
they can pay the benefits to people who have nothing to do with $500 but
let it sit for a year?
The DCU is not a good deal to the little guy, and for that reason, I
don't give them my money. It's the 60's radical hippie in me.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
11.81 | Service Charge | TAMARA::VANGILDER | Lory VanGilder | Thu Feb 12 1987 17:30 | 7 |
|
re: .2
If I remember correctly, DCU charges *YOU* $1.25 service
charge for *EACH* photo copy of the cancelled check.
|
11.82 | Probably doesn't even recover the cost | FURILO::BLINN | Let's do the `Time Warp' again | Thu Feb 12 1987 17:36 | 9 |
| .7> If I remember correctly, DCU charges *YOU* $1.25 service
.7> charge for *EACH* photo copy of the cancelled check.
Gee, at that low fee, I don't see how they can recover the
cost of finding the cancelled check and generating the copy,
so I have to assume they're subsidizing the cost of of the
savings in not sorting and returning the cancelled checks.
Tom
|
11.83 | cc charge | CASPRO::DLONG | | Fri Feb 13 1987 10:50 | 8 |
| According to what I have, it's free if you need it for tax purposes
[i.e. and IRS audit]..
I too would choose the DCU INSTANTLY if given the choice. I've
been in for almost 7 years and I've only had one problem. A
malfunctioning ATM triple debited my ex-wife's account. It was
swiftly taken care of. Not just the amount off but ALL charges
as a result [bounced checks].
|
11.84 | | KOALA::ROBINS | Scott A. Robins ZKO2-2/R47 DTN 381-2592 M/S R94 | Fri Feb 13 1987 13:10 | 4 |
| or to prove payment... I had to have a copy made and the teller
asked if it was to prove payment. I said yes, and was not charged.
Scott
|
11.151 | New branches in California | PUZZLE::BLUM | | Fri Feb 13 1987 22:13 | 6 |
| Does anyone know when DCU will open branches in California,
specifically in the Santa Clara area? The nearest branches are in
Colorado Springs and Phoenix. Also, what criteria does DCU use in
deciding when and where to open new branches?
John
|
11.152 | Sometime this year | EXIT26::STRATTON | Notes in White Satin | Sun Feb 15 1987 14:26 | 3 |
| There should be a DCU branch in Santa Clara sometime this
calendar year.
|
11.153 | | PUZZLE::BLUM | | Sun Feb 15 1987 17:46 | 8 |
|
GREAT!!!
|
11.178 | Candidates for DCU board of directors | EXIT26::STRATTON | Notes in White Satin | Sun Feb 15 1987 20:00 | 19 |
| Here are the people running for three positions on the DCU board of
directors. I looked them up in ELF, and indicated the site code where
ELF didn't have an electronic address.
Ernestine Anderson * BEANCT::ANDERSON
Homer Cates BRAT::CATES
Donato Infante, Jr. * @MLO
Phil Perkins CSTVAX::PERKINS
Susan Shapiro * OGOMTS::SHAPIRO
Mike Thornton @NRO
Paul Van De Wal @ICO
(The asterisk indicates the current board members.)
Ballots were mailed out to all members (16 years or older as of 12/31/86)
on 13 February. They must be returned by 13 March.
Jim Stratton
|
11.223 | NO INTEREST THIS QUARTER! | PUFFIN::BLODGETT | | Mon Feb 16 1987 08:10 | 29 |
| I have just received a shocking piece of information from the Credit
Union, that I thought might interest all of you.
Due to the new tax laws and the low interested paid by DCU on my
IRA, I decided to transfer the IRA. After filling out all the
paperwork for the new financial institution, I received a form from
DCU which reads: "I UNDERSTAND I RECEIVE NO DIVIDENDS IN THIS
QUARTER".
Now how unfair can they be? The Credit Union has had my 4 or 5
years worth of IRA for their use for two months this quarter and
they are not going to give me my dividends....I've got a surprise
for them. I will return the form they sent, signed with memo which
states that I will want the IRA transferred the day after they
post the dividends for this quarter.
The DCU does have some little idiosyncrasies that I have put up
with over the years because of its convenience, but not receiving
two months of interest is about the worst. Other things that bug
me about the DCU is: that if you have a loan on payroll deduction
and the loan is payed up, they will continue to take the weekly
deductions until such time as you tell them to stop; trying to
make changes to the payroll deduction which never get made and having
to fill out the forms again and again; the dial up system being
down more than it is up.
Enough of that.
I just wanted everyone to be aware of DCU's interest policy
|
11.7 | talking to the wind | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Mon Feb 16 1987 08:22 | 5 |
| Talking to the two people listed in Strattons's note is like talking
to the wind. You get the same results. Maybe more people joining
together can get DCU inproved.
ed
|
11.8 | Try the Board | EXIT26::STRATTON | Notes in White Satin | Mon Feb 16 1987 09:12 | 3 |
| re Ed (.7) - try talking to one or more of the board members
(see 8.0), if you feel that the Communications people (John
Tilley and Donna Lane Nelson) are not solving your problem(s).
|
11.224 | NOT UNUSUAL... | KOALA::FAMULARO | Joe, ZK02-2/R94, DTN381-2565 | Mon Feb 16 1987 09:41 | 4 |
| What DCU is doing is NOT unusual. Many investments work this way.
If you are not invested on the day dividends are paid then you
loose. Read the fine print in your IRA agreement and you may find
information regarding this situation.
|
11.179 | | MIGHTY::WILLIAMS | Bryan Williams | Mon Feb 16 1987 10:29 | 4 |
| How about posting the same information for all the board members?
Thanks,
Bryan
|
11.234 | No DCU off. or autoteller at LMO | PLDVAX::MORRISON | Bob M. LMO2/P41 296-5357 | Mon Feb 16 1987 11:06 | 23 |
| I have been a DCU member for 6 years and in general I have had
good luck. However, DCU doesn't eliminate the need for me to have a
bank checking account. There are two reasons for this:
1. DCU doesn't send canceled checks as most banks do. They have the
canceled checks on microfilm, but it would take time to get a hard
copy. There are a few transactions for which I need a canceled
check in case the payee says he didn't get the check, and I use my
BayBank Middlesex checking account for these.
2. I work at a plant (actually two buildings 500 feet apart) that
has 650 people. There is no DCU office and no automatic teller.
The nearest DCU office is 4 miles away by road (3 miles as the crow
flies, but we don't have wings). There is a BayBank two miles away.
So if I want to write a check for cash, it's easier to go to the
bank. Not only is it closer, but I can park real close and the
line is shorter. I cash a check once a week, and it would be just
too much bother to go to the DCU office at MRO1.
There are two ways a plant can have an automatic teller. They
must have a head count over 1000 or DEC must "buy" the automatic
teller at a high cost. Our plant manager is not willing to pay this
kind of money for no return except the convenience of employees
and (possibly) higher productivity, so we don't have an autoteller.
|
11.85 | | TOPDOC::MCLEAN | Happiness is a positive cash flow | Mon Feb 16 1987 13:17 | 8 |
| I switched to the DCU because of the no-minimum balance
in the NOW accounts.
I have saved $$$ by joining the DCU, just from escaping the fees
that my old bank used to charge me.
DM
|
11.109 | In part it's Uncle Sam | BCSE::KREFETZ | | Mon Feb 16 1987 13:21 | 14 |
|
RE: 4.3
I think part of the problem is that it is the federal government
(controller of credit unions) that requires that the savings
account be the primary account.
That is, the federal government views credit unions primarily as
savings institutions, with all other services being simply adjuncts.
This is why you cannot have a checking account without a savings
account and why you must always have at least $5.00 in your savings
account. (In fact, as I recall, formerly you couldn't even say
'checking account', you had to say 'sharedraft account' or some
such thing.)
|
11.150 | First, probably not Second | BCSE::KREFETZ | | Mon Feb 16 1987 13:29 | 4 |
| RE: .4 & .5
I think 6.4 was referring to first mortgages, not second mortgage
credit lines.
|
11.120 | DCU Savings/Checking Interest NOT Competitive! | SAFETY::SEGAL | Len Segal | Mon Feb 16 1987 13:31 | 46 |
| DCU has NOT been competitive with regards to savings/checking
interest rates for the past year, at least not in Mass. I have had
the majority of my "free cash" deposited at DCU since the day it
opened its doors for business.
However, in the past year, I have been draining most of my money out
of DCU. I am currently getting 6-3/4% at one local (South Shore)
Credit Union and 6-1/2% at the other. Both of these accounts are
adequately insured (either Federal, State, or both, can't recall
which), and they are Regular Savings accounts (no penalties for
withdrawals, etc.). DCU has been paying me 5-5-1/4% over this time.
I will admit that these interest rates are for large savings
accounts (>=$5K), but even the lower amount savings accounts beat
out DCU hands-down.
One of these accounts even gave me an XPRESS 24/CIRRUS/MONEY SUPPLY
card which allows transactions at ANY such machine ABSOLUTELY FREE
(NO transaction charges at all!!). I realize that DCU absorbs some
of the MONEC/POCKETBANK/PLUS System charges, but you still must pay
$1.00/transaction (according to new brochure) for non-DCU
transactions.
They must be doing something right (and better than DCU), since both
of them have been in business for many years and are quite
successful.
If anyone is interested, they are Crescent Credit Union and Brockton
Credit Union, both based out of Brockton, MA. [I have had an
account at CCU since the mid-60's and once had a share loan with
them to buy a car.] Also, Brockton Credit Union is the one with the
XPRESS 24 card.
FYI: These are CU's who are open to the public, you need not belong
to any group/organization to join them. [In some States, laws seem
to require CU's to be closed to the general public, available only
to sponsoring organizations.]
P.S. I once had a need to get a copy of a check which another
DECcie sent me (a DCU check) and I deposited to my DCU checking
account. I witnessed the MLO DCU Manager call DCU HQ to request a
copy, twice! Well, it has been 2+ years now, and still no
check!!!!! Great service, huh! Since the check was not between two
banks, and never had to go through a clearing house, it should have
been a piece of cake to find it, oh well... [The need for this
check has long since disappeared, so I am not pursuing it, just
raising it as proof of DCU's efficiency. :-(]
|
11.121 | apples to apples, please | PULSAR::WALLY | Wally Neilsen-Steinhardt | Mon Feb 16 1987 13:49 | 15 |
| .6> I will admit that these interest rates are for large savings
.6> accounts (>=$5K), but even the lower amount savings accounts beat
.6> out DCU hands-down.
But with more than $5K I can think of lots of things to do. For
example, a tax free bond fund pays an effective rate of 12% after
taxes. And a high yield bond fund about 11% taxable. Of course,
these funds differ from DCU in significant respects, in this case
risk. But so does your example.
The question is, how do DCU rates on deposits compare with other
institutions, given comparable conditions, such as minimum
balance, checkwriting, fees, ATM, convenience, compounding method,
deposit credit policy and so forth.
|
11.244 | How about the DCU for a mortgage? | TOPDOC::MCLEAN | Happiness is a positive cash flow | Tue Feb 17 1987 16:48 | 16 |
| Has anyone gotten a mortgage through DCU recently?
We have been looking to buy a bigger house, and I was planning to go
through the DCU when we find that "perfect" house.
I have seen a lot of notes regarding the DCU's mortgage process
which has now made me wonder if I should stay away from the DCU
for a mortgage. (I do have a NOW account with the DCU, with no
complaints).
Good and bad experiences regarding a mortgage would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
DM
|
11.122 | Info on CCU & BCU | SAFETY::SEGAL | Len Segal | Wed Feb 18 1987 00:17 | 88 |
| RE: .7
.6> I will admit that these interest rates are for large savings
.6> accounts (>=$5K), but even the lower amount savings accounts beat
.6> out DCU hands-down.
Crescent Credit Union pays the following for regular (share) savings
accounts:
Balance under $25.00 - No dividend
Balance $25.00 to $999.99 - 6%
Balance $1000.00 to $2499.99 - 6-1/4%
Balance $2500.00 to $4999.99 - 6-1/2%
Balance $5000.00 or more - 6-3/4%
These rates are the first change in some 7 years. Up until June 30,
1986, CCU paid 7% on ALL Share accounts, subsequent to that date,
the above rates are in effect.
If my memory is correct, Brockton Credit Union pays 6-1/2% for >$x
(x=$500. or $1000.). DCU has been paying ~5-1/4% for quite some
time now, even for large savings or NOW accounts, so the %-age
difference is significant.
> But with more than $5K I can think of lots of things to do. For
> example, a tax free bond fund pays an effective rate of 12% after
> taxes. And a high yield bond fund about 11% taxable. Of course,
> these funds differ from DCU in significant respects, in this case
> risk. But so does your example.
Since I am hoping to move closer to work, I will probably need much
of this "free cash" when I buy my next house, so I am not about to
invest it in long-term securities (or CD's). Once I buy the next
house, I will probably be cash-poor like many DECcies. If I felt
comfortable that I could invest this money for the long-term, I
would invest in more Municipal Bonds (Government Obligations only,
please!). I also have prospecti [;-)] from various bond funds
(taxable and taxfree) and they all claim high interest (typically
10-12%, giving examples from random dates). What is very
interesting is when I check Donoghue's 7-day averages the rates are
~4-5.5% (Avg. 4% for taxfree), nowhere near the claimed high
rates!!!
I take exception to your comment that CCU or BCU are higher risks
than DCU. According to the Boston Sunday Globe (2/15/87) Investment
Column (Beatson Wallace) "There are 175 state-chartered credit
unions subject to the jurisdiction and audit of the Massachusetts
commisioner of banks. Deposits in these credit unions are insured
by the Massachusetts Share Insurance Corp. (MSIC). ... Officials
of both insurance agencies (MSIC and NCUA-DCU is NCUA insured)
consider the present 1.3 percent of reserves to total inured shares
more than adequate. ... The credit unions, either state or federal
chartered, have insurance reserves far in excess of similar figures
for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) or the Federal
Savings and Loan Insurance Corp." CCU is MSIC insured (not sure if
BCU is NCUA, but otherwise it must be MSIC-by State Law), so you
make the decision, is this a great risk?? I don't think so (CCU
total assets as of October 1985 were in excess of $101Million).
> The question is, how do DCU rates on deposits compare with other
> institutions, given comparable conditions, such as minimum
> balance, checkwriting, fees, ATM, convenience, compounding method,
> deposit credit policy and so forth.
Rates and minimum balances are listed above. There are no fees as
such, and since I have no interest in checking accounts there, I
have no knowledge of terms. ATM's do not exist at CCU, BCU has a
better ATM set-up than DCU (I do use both) as described in my
previous reply and there are no fees. Both CU's pay interest
monthly and I do believe that they are based on day of deposit to
day of withdrawal. Deposits are credited immediately, but holds are
placed on personal checks (don't recall exact details, but Mass
State Law put a stop to rampant abuses a number of years ago).
CCU pays postage for mailing deposits and requests for withdrawals.
CCU has 4 offices in Brockton with one branch open until 6PM on
Mon/Tues/Fri, 7PM on Wed/Thurs, and 2PM on Sat. BCU is open until
4PM on Sat and has a number of branches, but since any XPRESS 24
machine will do, I have only visited their bank twice to date.
RE: Service - I have bought two cars by using CU share loans
(cheaper and much quicker to process than car loans). I have had an
account at CCU since the mid-60's and have always been pleased by
their service: Share loan for car took 24 hours to approve. I am a
Charter member of DCU and when I applied for the same type of loan
at DCU, it took more than 1 week and I wasn't notified until 2 days
after it was approved (and I had to pay interest from date of
approval, not date I picked up the check)!!!!
For further info, BCU: 617-586-2080, CCU: 617-559-5400.
|
11.245 | shop around | PSTJTT::TABER | omnia mutantur nos et mutamur in illis | Wed Feb 18 1987 09:19 | 16 |
| I don't know how it is currently, byt 20 months ago when I was looking
for a mortgage (in Mass.) the DCU had a higher application fee, assessed
more points, and was asking for a larger percentage rate than most of
the banks and mortgage companies that I looked into.
Given the length of the commitment, and "the magic of compound interest"
it's probably a good idea to shop around. Most banks are willing to
give their general terms ( fees, points and percentage) over the phone,
so you can check out a number of places in a few minutes. Also, the
real estate section of most major newspapers will print a summary of who
is giving what rates every week. Finally, if you're working through a
real estate agent, they often know who is giving the best deals in the
neighborhood. Maybe the DCU will turn out to be your best bet -- but
it's so easy to cover the field, you might as well do it.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
11.246 | expect the worst.... | CLT::BOURQUARD | Deb - Basselope owner | Wed Feb 18 1987 09:46 | 6 |
| The biggest drawback I've seen with DCU is that you can't lock in
a rate. (BTW, this changes -- depending on whose mortgages they're
selling, sometimes you can lock in the rate).
No matter who you go with, expect getting to closing to be a hassle.
If all goes smoothly, you'll be pleasantly surprised!
|
11.247 | No problems here... | KOALA::FAMULARO | Joe, ZK02-2/R94, DTN381-2565 | Wed Feb 18 1987 12:52 | 2 |
| We recently refinanced through DCU. No problems at all.
|
11.248 | Some hassle is expected | HEADS::OSBORN | Sally's VAXNotes Vanity Plate | Wed Feb 18 1987 17:08 | 41 |
| We recently refinanced.
The process was pro'ly no more trying than through any other
financial institution, although we are disappointed that DCU
wasn't a bit better than the rest.
We told the DCU that an addition was in progress. In fact, when
we were told that the appraiser would be there the next week, we
chuckled over whether the house would be worth more WITH or
WITHOUT the dumpster. The appraiser came, saw, conquered, and
wrote (correctly) that the kitchen was non-functional and under
repair. Then BancBoston (the secondary mortage market) wanted
another inspection report to state that 'the kitchen repairs are
fully complete' -- whatever that means. Well, you know,
appliances, cabinets, floors, stuff like that. Working
appliances we could provide. Cabinets? we aren't having builtin
cabinets. Flooring? we need the additional mortage $$$ to buy
the hardwood floors. Catch-22! And guess who got to pay another
$50 for the second appraisal inspection? We insisted that DCU
get BancBoston to accept 'kitchen is fully functional' BEFORE we
agreed to the second inspection; we changed the commitment
letter; we got the mortgage, no payments due until 1-April!
Since two Digits own the house and belong to the DCU, we expected
that the DCU would take money from each of each equally. No,
they only take it all from one. But offered the possibility of
having an automatic tranfer from the account of the non-payer to
the account of the payer.
I still wonder why they only investigated the credit background
of one of us, although the house and mortgage are (now) in both
names....
The big surprise for me was the number of forms at the closing --
twenty or twenty-five. Including the no-urea-foam-insulation
form, the non-other-real-estate-loans form, the Massachusetts
I-can-change-my-mind-in-three-days form, but (oh, oh) THEY forgot
the no-lead-paint-OR-no-children-under-six form. A big change
from the five forms in 1981 and the three in 1976. And
everything in triplicate, so the DCU keeps one, the BancBoston
gets one, and (eventually) we will get one.
|
11.249 | Refinance timeframe | HACKET::KUSCHER | Ken Kuscher | Fri Feb 20 1987 10:51 | 4 |
|
What is the length of time involved in a refinance?
Ken
|
11.225 | "DCU TOLD ME A DIFFERENT STORY" | TLE::ROSSI | | Fri Feb 20 1987 14:00 | 10 |
| I will check this out with the DCU because I am also transferring
my IRA to a mutual fund .... but they told me that as long as I
did not completely cancel out my IRA I would receive interest
calculated on the IRA balance each day up until the transfer ... I
would forfit all interest only if there was no account existing when
they were paying interest.
-cynthia
|
11.250 | DCU is OK, BancBoston is the pits :-( | REGENT::EPSTEIN | Bruce Epstein | Mon Feb 23 1987 12:39 | 10 |
| We closed our mortgage (new purchase) on November 1 through
DCU. We found DCU to be as good (or bad) as any other institution
in this regard. BancBoston, on the other hand, has been the
worst financial institution I have ever had to deal with. They
have LOST paperwork, including our tax bill (and claim they never
received it, yet they cashed the payment check that was included
in the same envelope). So, beware what happens after the mortgage
is closed!
Bruce
|
11.86 | Not only at DCU... | NANUCK::FORD | Noterdamus | Mon Feb 23 1987 22:55 | 9 |
| Having difficulty getting your hands on a cancelled check isn't
only a problem at DCU but seems to be a problem other credit unions
have also. My wife is a member of a non-DEC credit union and when
she had need of a copy of a cancelled check it was a gut wrenching
ordeal. I for one would like to hear all the problems that are
being hinted at.
JEF
|
11.226 | Possible Interest paid | PUFFIN::BLODGETT | | Tue Feb 24 1987 07:05 | 9 |
| At this point I am confused too. When I talked to DCU after signing
the transfer approval, I was told that if the account was left open
the interest would be paid to the account but that if you closed
the account before the end of the quarter, the interest would not
be posted. Since I am leaving he IRA account open and probably
will have some low $ amount put in each week in the near future,
I am hoping that the interest will be accrued.
Will let you know.
|
11.87 | No problem in the past | PUFFIN::BLODGETT | | Tue Feb 24 1987 07:08 | 5 |
| I have had to get copies of two checks from DCU in the past, and
never had any problems. The people that I talked to were very
cordial and the copies were received in a reasonable amount of
time. (This was a number of years ago.) As I recall I never had
to pay a fee for the copies.
|
11.88 | Cancelled Checks are the Pits | TUNDRA::SOJDA | Larry Sojda | Tue Feb 24 1987 08:28 | 8 |
| Although I have had a minimum of problems with DCU and would highly
recommend them, getting a copy of a cancelled check is their low
point. I have had to do this only twice - the first time it took
about 4-5 weeks. By the time I got the copy it was moot since I
had resolved the problem. The second time I never did get the copy
even though I was billed the $1.00 service charge.
Larry
|
11.89 | Checking, yes--Investing, no... | MTV::PENNEY | NonCents! | Tue Feb 24 1987 14:05 | 12 |
| For checking, auto loans: YES!
For investments, IRAs: No! You can do much, much better with no-load
mututal funds. But, I think banks are generally a bad place for
investments anyway.
The thing I can't forget was those long waiting lines in Merrimack a
few years back. I don't work there anymore, so maybe they no longer
exist?
Bill
|
11.90 | no problems, no charges getting canceled checks | CLT::BOURQUARD | Deb - Basselope owner | Tue Feb 24 1987 17:46 | 5 |
| Last November, the bank (not DCU) holding my mortgage switched to a
new billing system. For 3 months, they cashed my check without
crediting my account. For 3 months, I had to go to DCU to get a
copy of the cancelled check. In each case, I received it within
3-5 days of the request, and I was not charged for this service.
|
11.180 | any recommendations? | COOKIE::DOUCETTE | Chuck Doucette | Wed Feb 25 1987 19:09 | 8 |
| Does anybody have any recommendations on who to vote for?
Normally I wouldn't care, but recently I have been upset with
the service (not that new board members would change that).
Thanks,
Chuck
|
11.181 | shake 'em up | PSTJTT::TABER | D'ye nae ken the wunda owit? | Thu Feb 26 1987 08:58 | 12 |
| >Normally I wouldn't care, but recently I have been upset with
>the service (not that new board members would change that).
I think it could be a worthwhile thing to shake up the board. I
recently got a message from Homer Cates, who is running as a black
horse candidate. He asked that I cast only one vote on the ballot and
that it be for him. I can see where it would be good for the incumbents
to have to deal with someone who was running by petition instead of
being selected by the nominating commitee, and I think it would be a
strong message that we are dissatisfied with the DCU as it stands.
I plan to go for it.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
11.182 | | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Thu Feb 26 1987 12:00 | 8 |
| Re -.1
I agree. I sent mine after voting for ALL new directors, especially
Mr. Cates. I figured if he wants to be on the Board bad enough
to go the petition route, he's got my vote. I think the DCU has
started to decline a little and this is the only way open to the
members to affect a change. Vote for NEW directors.
|
11.110 | There is Hope in Order.... | SWATT::LEEBER | sNOw More! | Thu Feb 26 1987 16:03 | 48 |
| The description in 4.4 is correct, or at least is consistent with both
the explanation I've received from the DCU and the behavior of account
deposits when I have change the deduction amount.
There is hope! There is a way that John Tilley (dtn 223-6735), et
al. helped me put together. I don't have the specifics on me now,
but it went something like this:
There is a means to specify the ORDER in which the DCU divides up
the lump sum they get from DEC payroll.
Case 1)
If you were to reduce the amount going into an account and the
net effect from the DEC payroll view is less of a lump sum to DCU,
then the account to be reduced (or removed) MUST be the last account
specified in the order of deductions. Otherwise the last account
in the list is short changed until DEC and DCU match.
Case 2)
If you are adding an account or an amount to an existing account
and the net effect is to increase the lump sum from the DEC payroll,
then again the account being added must be last in the deductions
list. Until DEC and DCU match the last account will come up short
(or $0) but all other accounts will get the right amounts.
I thought that a teller at DCU HEADQUARTERS can change the ordering
list. For case 2, have the new account added and submit a payroll
deduction card at the same time. The DCU can the add the new (and
last) account to the deduction order and everything will work just
fine.
This does mean if you have lots of accounts like me (all 5 family
members have their own savings, also there are 2 checking, several
Xmas clubs, CHEF accounts, etc...), then you need a little planning
up front. It is do-able.
Suggestion of the week:
If my description of the above is even closely correct, there should
be a DCU software solution to automatically reorder the deductions
list based on the cases described. That is make deduction changes
user transparent.
Carl
BTW, money deposited into family member accounts are first deposited
into you main savings account (share .1?). A transfer transaction
moves the $$ from there to each family member's account or sub account.
|
11.183 | Hi Homer | VINO::WEINER | Sam | Thu Feb 26 1987 17:39 | 4 |
| Having worked for Homer Cates many, many moons ago (we are both
< 1 year @DEC) I can attest that he is the type of person likely
to shake things up.
|
11.111 | Spread the dough | CSTVAX::PERKINS | | Fri Feb 27 1987 18:05 | 15 |
|
The process described in 4.8 seems too simple (and therfore too complex for
mortal man to figure out).
In credit and payment systems I've been invloved in the past, something like
this works on a proportional basis. In other words, spread the dollars into all
accounts based on the proportion of each account to the whole.
If the total dollar amount into the process is correct, then each account gets
its full share. If the amount is over or under due to poor timing from Digital
payroll, (as I read it here) then each account gets at least some money dropped
into it.
Phil Perkins
|
11.184 | An active incumbent | ULTRA::HERBISON | B.J. [Digital Internal Use Only] | Sun Mar 01 1987 13:39 | 13 |
| I'm not sure how much the board of directors can change DCU,
but I do have some evidence that one of the current board
members is trying to help solve the problems at DCU.
I mentioned a problem I had with DCU in this conference,
and received a mail message from Susan Shapiro. She wanted
to know if she could take my note and show it to people working
at DCU who could address the problem.
When I had called DCU directly, I all found was people who
didn't care.
B.J.
|
11.185 | Equal Time | BEIRUT::SUNNAA | | Sun Mar 01 1987 19:01 | 17 |
|
I forwarded a copy of the one of the notes in this topic to some
of the candidates (the ones that had a node address listed) encouraging
them to participate in this topic as I feel that it is only fair
that all should get equal time. If anyone knows how to reach the
rest who don't have node address listed, I would appreciate it if you
notify them too.
I for one would like to know if the board is capable of making any
changes or correcting any of the problems that members have with
DCU. If not, then maybe voting isn't worth the effort..let's hope
that is not the case. And maybe if there is some dialogue between
the members and the board through this notesfile, something positive
might come out of it.
Nisreen
|
11.186 | talking to the wind | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Mon Mar 02 1987 15:46 | 5 |
|
I don't want to defuss this topic, but regarding .7, I hope that
the board of directers notices that all problems are not being solved
by the folks in headquarters. Talking to them as I had meantioned
before is like talking to the wind.
|
11.91 | my ideas about DCU | DLO09::WATKINS | | Fri Mar 20 1987 02:35 | 19 |
| If you are not going to be in the Boston area you will need to have
two accounts. One local and DCU. As I am from Texas they have
no service here at all, even though we have about 600 employes in
Dallas alone. The checking is great because it cost nothing, but
I have not had much luck at anything else. I was turned down for
a $3,000 car loan because I did not include my wifes income in the
loan app. The cars loan value was $4,600 and I always have $1,000
to $4,000 in the DCU, as well as having 8% held out for SAVE and
10% for stock, which either one could have been stopped and more
that covered the payment. I joined the DCU the first time they offered
direct deposit and have never have had a check returned, for any
reason. If that is not good enough credit for them I will never
go to them again for a loan, and as soon as something as good comes
along its bye bye DCU. I went to a local bank and got the loan
in 2 days from start to finish for 6 months longer at a cheeper
intrest rate. With policies like this I do not know how they make
any money to pay the good rates on your "savings".
Yes I am bitter.
|
11.187 | how about a complaint system that works? | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Sun Mar 22 1987 19:11 | 13 |
|
It was nice getting the personal attention from the would be(and
current) board of directers due to notes in this notesfile. Now
that the election is drawing to a close, we won't see them until
next election. Instead of answering our complaints directly, it
would have been nice if the directors set in motion a means of
answering ANSWERING, responding RESPONDING to complaints. I sure
hope that the board has better things to do than to handle user
complaints directly. The current complaint
system isn't working as evidnet by notes in this confernece.
just my opinion
ed
|
11.235 | Don't com,plain | CEDSWS::SCHELL | Mark S. - Sls support | Sun Mar 29 1987 15:59 | 16 |
| Fair warning - I've been reading thru the file, and this is the
first note that I've replied to - so the New England attitude backlash
is coming out here first...
(Mild Flame)
I have no sympathy for anyone who complains about not having a branch,
ATM or other DCU presence nearby (or even 4 miles down the road).
I work in the field, where there isn'ta DCU branch within 500 miles!
(Flame off)
I've bben a DCU member for as long as I've been with DEC, about
4 years. I've had no problems with them, and will continue to use
them for most of my banking needs. I keep a local savings and loan
accoutn to handle check cashing needs.
|
11.188 | | BEIRUT::SUNNAA | | Sun Mar 29 1987 19:59 | 7 |
|
REF: the elections -
Anyone knows the results of the election?
Nisreen
|
11.236 | spread the joy around | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Tue Mar 31 1987 13:17 | 6 |
|
the real pisser is where they have a branch AND ATM side by side.
I'd favor putting the ATM in locations that have no branch!
But that might be too much common sence for some people I know.
ed
|
11.237 | Compared to what? | ULTRA::KINDEL | Bill Kindel | Tue Mar 31 1987 14:35 | 10 |
| I think one's attitude towards the presence/absence of a DCU office
and/or ATM is largely a matter of expectation. For those of us who
live/work in the Boston area, it's not all that unreasonable to expect
the DCU to be (nearly) as convenient as the commercial institutions
with which it competes for our business.
I don't, for example, have anywhere near the same expectations from the
credit union I joined while I was stationed in Omaha. I suspect the
author of .2 sees the DCU in much the same way. That's okay as long as
it satisfies his/her expectations.
|
11.238 | right! cash machines should be where branches aren't. | VIDEO::OSMAN | type video::user$7:[osman]eric.six | Tue Mar 31 1987 14:39 | 10 |
| Good question! Perhaps they need a branch there so they can have
a trained DCU personnum to load the cash and maintain the machine.
But still, your're right. The automatic cash machine is most needed
where there is no branch! Let's go for it. Someone want to ask
DCU about why this is the way it is ?
p.s. Does anyone from DCU read this electronic conference ??
/Eric
|
11.239 | It's a tough call.. | FURILO::BLINN | Let's do the `Time Warp' again | Tue Mar 31 1987 15:05 | 11 |
| There are lots of "cash machines" where there aren't DCU branches.
But since DCU pays someone else (typically another bank or the ATM
network) to maintain these, it quite reasonably passes on part of
the cost of use to the user. These ATMs are in a variety of
places, such as other banks, grocery stores, and the like.
While it would be "nice" if DCU had more DCU ATMs in DEC locations
that don't have DCU offices, they would have to maintain them, and
unless they drew enough business, they wouldn't be profitable.
Tom
|
11.240 | 1-800-THE-PLUS | USFHSL::STREMICK | EVERYTHING is Relative!! | Wed Apr 01 1987 10:45 | 13 |
| I have had good luck with DCU so far. I'm in Detroit and have no
branch near either.
But, I use the ATM's connected to the PLUS network. I've been able to
use my DCU card in Chicago, Santa Clara and several machines here in
Detroit. The way I find an ATM is to call 1-800-THE-PLUS. The robot
on the other end will ask for the area code and exchange(1st 3 digits)
of the phone you are calling from. The robot will then tell you the
locations of two ATM PLUS machines near you. Instant money!
Happy ATMing.
Jim Stremick
|
11.241 | | LYMPH::DICKSON | Network Design tools | Fri Apr 03 1987 10:29 | 9 |
| There is an ATM in MKO2, and an office in MKO1. I always walk over, as I
threw away my DCU ATM card quite a while ago. Besides, the thing is
embarassing to use, with its little voice prompting you along.
I sure hope that NOBODY from the DCU is reading this, as DCU employees
are not Digital employees, and should have no access to this network.
Members of the Board of Directors (whoever they might be - don't they
ever announce election results?) might be expected to pass along any
concerns.
|
11.9 | How Do We Want This Solved? | SWATT::LEEBER | sNOw More! | Tue Apr 21 1987 17:36 | 31 |
| With the moderator's OK, I have talked with John Tilley of the DCU
and DEC corporate security folks.
Mr. Tilley is most interested in gaining the insight into the complaints
of DCU members. The issues of credit cards, etc. is of great interest
to the DCU (no specifics at this time). DEC security is just as
interested in the conference entries staying right where they are;
inside DEC.
Several options have been discussed, these include:
o print the notes and mail the hardcopy, (risk: security & individuals
objections).
o get personal to summarize the entries and have the DCU address
the issues in the DCU information publication that comes with the
monthly statements (risk: minimal, but too much filtering).
o establish a note in this conference, for the explicit intention
of communicating (hardcopy or softcopy) replies to the DCU. Replies
from the DCU would be posted there too (risk: must be cleared with
security, proper posting of notes intent, duplicate discussions).
o other......
What do you think? If you are a security or personal type, please
let us know in your reply here. Well, its almost time to fish or
cut bait!
Carl
|
11.10 | | SRFSUP::LEAS | No such thing as objective opinion | Tue Apr 21 1987 20:01 | 12 |
|
With the proper posting of the intent of the entire notesfile,
is it altogether impossible to have the the whole thing made
available to (all or part of) the DCU for their perusal &
feedback?
I understand the importance of seperating the DCU and its
employees from the Enet, but aren't there employees of DEC
w/in the DCU? Specifically, do the board members ever read
this file? Maybe they should.
Rob
|
11.189 | Current board of directors | EXIT26::STRATTON | F$FAO now brown cow | Tue Apr 21 1987 22:09 | 14 |
| Here is the current DCU Board of Directors.
Mark Steinkrauss (chairman) @MSO
George Herman PIGGY::GEORGE
Donato Infante @MLO
James Lawless @FXO
Cherlene O'Brien @CFO
Susan Shapiro OGOMTS::SHAPIRO
Paul Van de Wal @ICO
The "mail" information comes from Elf.
Jim Stratton
|
11.11 | | WORDS::BADGER | Happy Trails | Wed Apr 22 1987 00:20 | 11 |
|
I object to anyone taking a note that I have written in any part
outside of the conference it was written in.
I will make my complaints via official channels first. Thats
the proper way to get problems solved( even if I have expressed
my concerns elsewhere).
Those entering complaints within should be aware that during
election time, prespective directers may contact them regarding
notes entered, even if the contact is lip service.
ed
|
11.12 | This has come up in other files | PSTJTT::TABER | April: cruel month or just taxing? | Wed Apr 22 1987 10:01 | 13 |
| Since this file is a semi-public forum, I don't see why people would
object to having the notes extracted and circulated. The only
requirements for reading this file, at present, are access to a VAX,
knowledge of NOTES, and the knowledge that this file exists. You have
no way of knowing *who* reads the contents of this file. The network is
not even marginally secure. If you're saying things about the DCU that
you feel you couldn't defend if confronted by a DCU employee, then you
shouldn't be saying them AT ALL.
Personally, I was hoping that this file *was* being read by DCU
employees. That's much better than having it be a pointless, powerless
collection of gripes.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
11.13 | a workable idea? | REGENT::EPSTEIN | Bruce Epstein | Wed Apr 22 1987 10:04 | 13 |
| >> Specifically, do the board members ever read
>> this file? Maybe they should.
Wouldn't that solve both problems? That is, the board members (who
represent *us*, after all) could read this conference (if they can't
get to notes, maybe someone (moderators?) could mail copies to them),
then summarize our concerns to DCU management.
Note that while the board members are DEC employees (thus no security
problem), specific notes should only be used with the author's
permission (sort of like writing a personal letter).
Bruce
|
11.14 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Wed Apr 22 1987 10:29 | 8 |
| >specific notes should only be used with the author's permission (sort of
>like writing a personal letter).
But this is a work related conference.
Notes written here are more like business letters than personal letters.
/john
|
11.15 | The Chairman Agrees To Review This Conference | SWATT::LEEBER | sNOw More! | Wed Apr 22 1987 16:05 | 13 |
| I just got off the phone with Mr. Mark Steinkrauss, chairman of the DCU
board and a DEC employee. He has agreed to review this file and
transmit summarized information of interest to the DCU.
Names of individuals will *NOT* be included. The method of review will
be via a batch command file that will read and mail the new entries to
Mark.
It is not clear at this time if or how Mark (representing the DCU) will
respond. It is possible that the issues raised in this conference may
appear in future DCU monthly mailings.
Carl
|
11.16 | Report problems with network security elsewhere | FURILO::BLINN | Never try to teach a pig to sing.. | Wed Apr 22 1987 18:41 | 21 |
| Mr. Taber, sir:
In your reply (.12) you make the statement "The network is
not even marginally secure."
To paraphrase another part of your reply, if you're saying
things about the network that you feel you couldn't defend
if confronted by network management, then you shouldn't be
saying them at all.
If you are aware of problems with network security, please
present the evidence to Pete McVay, who has responsibility
for helping maintain the security of the Easynet. Otherwise,
please don't paint with such a broad brush.
Thanks for your consideration.
Tom
PS: There are ongoing discussions of the Easynet security
program in the ANCHOR::EASYNET conference; KP7/Select, etc.
|
11.17 | I stand behind what I've said, thanks. | PSTJTT::TABER | April: cruel month or just taxing? | Thu Apr 23 1987 09:18 | 37 |
| Mr. Blinn, Sir,
Since you've brought this up publicly, I'll respond in kind, and
then we can use channels for any further discussion. (Besides, it might
be helpful for others to know the extent to which we are an open
network.)
The first level of leakage on the network comes via friends and
family of DEC employees. The employees themselves give out dial-up
numbers and login information. Usually so the people receiving the
information can play games and read notes. There are at least four times
that I've caught someone's kid tripping a security alarm on systems that
I've managed.
The second level of leakage is terminated employees who still
have active accounts. On systems I've taken over, I've found accounts
for people who have been gone as long as five years. The usual response
to that is "Oh, that's <supply name here>, he's OK."
The third level is the hard-core hacker. If you have anything
to do with the network, then you know we've been hit by them before.
Information from the engineering net has appeared in magazines,
newspapers, is frequently quoted by customers at DECUS and in one case a
whole advertising campaign was swiped and somehow got to a competitor.
THIS IS NOT A SECURE NET. You cannot know who is reading public files.
If you have something to say that you'd be ashamed of, don't say it
here.
> To paraphrase another part of your reply, if you're saying
> things about the network that you feel you couldn't defend
> if confronted by network management, then you shouldn't be
> saying them at all.
By all means, confront me, and deny any of the above.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
11.18 | Can I Get Interest On This NET? | SWATT::LEEBER | sNOw More! | Thu Apr 23 1987 10:28 | 17 |
| Mr. Taber and Mr. Blinn, Gentlemen;
As a reader of this conference, I would like to offer my opinion on the
topic being discussed in .16 and .17.
This conference is about the DCU. The discussions of this note did
begin by touching upon the issue of network security while in the
context of the DCU. Further, the recent exchange may have been most
informative to folks reading this conference, but appears to be no
longer DCU related.
Therefore, I would like to suggest this matter be moved "off-line" or
to a more subject related conference (as suggested in 2.16).
Carl Leeber
I
|
11.19 | Let's protect our principle (sic), too | FURILO::BLINN | Never try to teach a pig to sing.. | Thu Apr 23 1987 11:28 | 5 |
| Agreed. I don't disagree with Mr. Taber that there are problems
with network security, and the leaks he has described do in fact
exist. Further discussions should take place in another forum.
Tom
|
11.20 | | BEIRUT::SUNNAA | | Thu Apr 30 1987 13:02 | 7 |
|
Thank you Mr. Leeber for all your efforts regarding getting some
visibility to this notesfile and the problems/complaints to DCU
board members...
Nisreen
|
11.251 | debt ratios funny? | MIGHTY::WILLIAMS | Bryan Williams | Wed May 27 1987 17:44 | 5 |
| How come the DCU requires a 25/32 ratio instead of 28/36 like most
of the other banks around town? I would have thought that they would
have been a little more liberal than conservative...
Bryan
|
11.112 | A little "operator error" on this one | DACT6::COLEMAN | Illegitimi non Carborundum | Wed May 27 1987 19:12 | 32 |
| I just re-read all of these replies and I think I have just had
a slightly different version of this bite me. The scenario is as
follows:
This is what I used to do:
$50 a week put into my "primary" account
$200 week into my share draft account
$remainder direct deposited to my local account
I then sent in one of the little yellow cards to increase the amount
for share draft from $200 to $235 a week. That is ALL that I filled
in on the form (other than badge #, etc.)
This is what I got:
$0 a week in my "primary" account
$235 a week in my share draft account
$remainder direct deposited...
When I called them to ask why this happened, I was told that I should
fill in ALL the fields for which I currently have deductions. In other
words, I should have put $50 dollars with $0 change in the primary
field. I said that that was rather non-obvious, and the person I was
talking to agreed. Her reaction was that the form should make it clear
that you should fill in ALL fields. My reaction is that since it is a
Change form, if I don't put something in a field it should stay the way
it was. She also said that "it depended on who does the data entry" as
well. In other words, one person might do it "my way" and another
might do it "her way." Is this any way to run a bank/credit
union/whatever? Everytime I use one of those @#*& yellow forms,
it's a new adventure in creative accounting...
Perry
|
11.252 | we have met the enemy... | REGENT::EPSTEIN | Bruce Epstein | Thu May 28 1987 09:31 | 4 |
| The ratios they used when we applied last year were still 28/36,
but if they've changed, it's probably to protect *us* (DCU members)
from bad loans, or perhaps tighter restrictions by FNMA (the government
mortgage agency - I think that's the right acronym).
|
11.253 | DCU mortage policy | RCKRLL::STANLEY | Tim Stanley | Thu Sep 03 1987 16:04 | 20 |
| I applied for a mortgage with DCU on August 24th.
I want to lock in the rate.
The person who wrote up the application believes
that it is not possible to lock in the rate.
I asked about this at application and recently
over the phone. No can do. Period.
Has anyone applied for a DCU mortgage since about
August 1st, 1987? Were you able to lock in before
commitment? On what date? Who wrote up your application?
Reply either here or if you prefer, to WONDER::STANLEY.
Thanks in advance for any info.
Tim Stanley
Posted to CONSUMER, REAL_ESTATE
|
11.21 | September Status Report On New Entry Transmission | SWATT::LEEBER | 1SPCS Hits Pay-dirt! Film at eleven | Wed Sep 16 1987 13:09 | 25 |
| Hi everyone;
Just a status report on the transmission of new entries in this
conference to the chairman of the DCU board of directors. As the author
of this arrangement (with this conference moderator's blessing), I did
touch base with Mark Steinkrauss (Chairman and DEC employee) and John
Tilley (Customer Service Representative and DCU employee). They assure
me that:
1) Mr. Steinkrauss is receiving the entries (*),
2) they find value to the information contained in them, and
3) they have acted as a result of information entered in this
conference (example: I'm told a programmer will be brought in RE:
46.0).
(*) Mr. Tilley receives information from Mr. Steinkrauss via hard-copy
summaries, stripped of DEC employee information.
It is my hope (and reason for my being involved in this effort) that
DEC employees have and continue to benefit from the direct
communication to the top of the DCU.
Carl Leeber
|
11.242 | What does it take to establish new branch | REGENT::MERRILL | Glyph, and the world glyphs with u,... | Tue Sep 29 1987 18:44 | 17 |
|
Our business unit is planning to move to Westford MA, and we would
like to know what it would take to have a branch or at least an ATM there.
What does it take to justify opening a new branch?
How many customers would be needed?
How does DCU calculate the number of customers they would expect
at the site?
How much money "on deposit" would be needed?
How do we inform them so they will be ready when we are?
Rick
Merrill
|
11.22 | Announcing Official Responses From DCU | 15748::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Fri Oct 09 1987 12:17 | 35 |
| Hi everyone;
I am pleased to announce that the DCU has chosen to "officially"
respond to some of the issues discussed by noters of this conference,
*IN* this conference. I have agreed to place the responses sent to me
by John Tilley in the conference.
I quote the opening paragraph from John Tilley:
" To make the DCU notes file a useful two-way communication tool, the
DCU Communication Department will respond to notes regarding credit
union policies and procedures for clarification and understanding.
All members are encouraged to call the Communication Department at
DTN/223-6735, ext. 239 or 207 for individual assistance or problem
resolution. "
The DCU communications arrive via hard-copy. I will break the DCU's
response memo into topic areas and enter the responses as a reply to
the appropriate note (wherever possible). I will continue this effort
until:
1) It takes too much time (I do still work for DEC {:^)> ),
2) Someone else steps forward to do this, or
3) The volume of responses gets too big.
I hope that this plan serves to help the noters of this conference.
Carl Leeber
Maintainer-Of-Batch-Mailing-Of-New-Notes-To-DCU-Chairman
|
11.23 | | MORMPS::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Fri Oct 09 1987 14:02 | 5 |
| Well...without putting my hand up - I think what you're doing Carl,
is Great - and will make this file even a better forum for useful
discussion (and may hopefully lead to direct DCU access - even if
its under the watchful eye of security)
|
11.24 | Help is always available | 24699::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Fri Oct 09 1987 15:16 | 5 |
| If you find that you need assistance in doing the communications
with the Credit Union, I would be willing to assist you.
Ed..
|
11.243 | DCU/Baybank | 39685::CGILMORE | | Fri Oct 16 1987 10:32 | 7 |
| I can't believe .0 complained about the 'nearest' DCU branch
being 4 miles away !!! Our closest is + 25 miles away!
Sure there are lots of ATM's around, but MOST of them don't
allow you to make deposits to DCU, and a lot of them only
seem to accept the DCU card 'when they feel like it'
Baybanks are in every town i'm in. My checking account might
be with DCU, but Baybanks gets my vote for everything else!
|
11.25 | Thanks | 9096::WEST | On a clear disk you can seek forever | Sun Nov 08 1987 20:57 | 5 |
| I would just like to personally thank you.
-=> Jim <=-
|
11.26 | Official Responses Received, Dated 23-Nov-1987 | 15748::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Wed Nov 25 1987 11:34 | 10 |
| Hi folks...
John Tilley has again sent official responses for posting. These
will be handled as before (see note 2.22). The date of record is
23-November-1987.
Remaining at your service, I am...
Carl Leeber
{maintainer_of_batch_mailing_of_new_DCU_notes_entries_to_the_DCU_BOD_chair}
|
11.92 | See Note 71.0 for DCU Operating Cost Response | 15748::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Wed Nov 25 1987 12:03 | 2 |
| Carl Leeber
{maintainer_of_batch_mailing_of_new_entries_to_DCU_BOD_Chair}
|
11.154 | Year Almost Gone!! | SKYLRK::SHORE | Jim Shore | Tue Dec 01 1987 18:21 | 4 |
|
Well, now that the calender year is almost over, is there a new
date for the calif. branch to open.
|
11.27 | The "Glitch" Grinch Strikes Extract/Mail Job | SWATT::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Wed Jan 06 1988 09:50 | 19 |
|
Hi Folks;
I hope your holidays were safe and happy.
Most of the new entries between December 24th and January 5th, posted
in this conference, were not sent to Mr. Steinkrauss until January 5th.
This was due to a cluster "glitch" that stopped the batch job
responsible for extracting and mailing the new entries.
This problem has no effect on the notes conference itself, but did
delay the transmission of the new entries to the DCU Board Chairman. It
is anticipated that efforts to finally resolve the cluster problem will
interrupt information flow over the coming days (weeks?). I will do
what I can to keep the information moving.
Carl
{maintainer_of_the_mailing_of_new_DCU_notes_entries_to_BOD_chair}
|
11.28 | Official Responses Received, Dated 5-January-1988 | SWATT::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Thu Jan 07 1988 08:53 | 10 |
| Hi All...
John Tilley has again sent official responses for posting. These
will be handled as before (see note 2.22). The date of record is
5-January-1988.
Remaining at your service, I am...
Carl Leeber
{maintainer_of_batch_mailing_of_new_entries_to_DCU_BOD_chair}
|
11.155 | DCU & the Price Club?!? | WNDSRF::HEBERT | | Mon Jan 18 1988 16:50 | 9 |
| -< While we're at it in CA >-
I have stumbled accross a buying club which has membership restricted
to employees of member companies and to members of certain credit
unions. It is called the "Price Club" and if DCU is opening a branch
out here I would like to suggest that DCU participation in the Price Club
could be a significant incentive for bay area locals to bank with DCU.
Paul Hebert
|
11.29 | Official Responses Received, Dated 18-January-1988 | SWATT::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Wed Jan 20 1988 14:03 | 10 |
| Hi folks...
John Tilley has again sent official responses for posting. These
will be handled as before (see note 2.22). The date of record is
18-January-1988.
Remaining at your service, I am...
Carl Leeber
{maintainer_of_batch_mailing_of_new_DCU_notes_entries_to_the_DCU_BOD_chair}
|
11.30 | Please remember, temporarily one way! | SWATT::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Wed Jan 27 1988 08:56 | 15 |
| Attention all fellow DCU conference noters:
I feel I must stress:
Due to technical problems on the host cluster, extractions of new are
*NOT* going to the DCU chairman of the board (DEC employee). This is a
*TEMPORARY* condition!
Several folks have made note entries that seem to expect DCU responses.
These entries were after the conference moderator posted a note
indicating the temporary suspension of mailings. The entries are ok (of
course), but please set your expectations for replies accordingly!
Carl
{maintainer-of-batch-extract-of-new-entries-to-DCU-bod-chair}
|
11.156 | Update to 7.3 | SKYLRK::SHORE | Jim Shore | Wed Jan 27 1988 10:31 | 4 |
| Now that the calendar year is OVER is there anymore info on when
the branch in Calif. will open if ever.
Jim
|
11.31 | Delayed to getting to COB, or Never? | FROST::EDSOND | | Wed Jan 27 1988 15:17 | 7 |
| re .30
Does this mean that from such and such a date till another, those
messages will never get to the chairman of the board or they will
be delayed?
Don
|
11.32 | | BEIRUT::SUNNAA | | Thu Jan 28 1988 00:47 | 5 |
|
re -1: All it means is that the messages are not currently reaching
DCU but will be sent in at a later date.
NJS
|
11.33 | A little bailing wire and chewing gum...Extraction Running | SWATT::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Fri Feb 05 1988 17:13 | 9 |
| The extraction and mailing batch process has been restarted today,
Friday, 05-February-1988, at 17:11. The mailing is to Mark Steinkrauss,
chairman-of-the-board and DEC employee.
The batch process sent extracted notes and replies from 12-January-1988
through today. This covers all entries since the process was previously
stopped.
Carl
|
11.93 | 5% on Savings stinks! | HPSCAD::KNEWTON | | Wed Feb 17 1988 16:51 | 12 |
| I thought the savings were supposed to earn money market rates.
They, in fact, are the lowest paying rates for a savings account.
Other Credit Unions are paying 6-7% around the Marlboro, MA area.
I, therefore, do not keep much in my savings. I do have a checking
and the only thing I don't like about it is the $1.75 charge for
the ATM. This still may be less then other service fees, but, it
would be nice if the checking account were totally free and earned
a money market rate for a constant balance over $1,000.00. I guess
that's asking too much.
Kathy
|
11.254 | No bridge loan from DCU | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | CIT: Solving ISDN's hang-ups | Thu Feb 18 1988 10:53 | 15 |
| If I am to buy a new house and sell the old one, I must take posession
of the new house before the new owner can get posession of the old
one. Last time, I used a bridge loan, which was a second mortgage
on the old house to cover the down payment on the new one. A
commercial bank was happy to give it, since I had a signed P&S on
the old house and was taking their mortgage for the new one.
DCU, however, recently said "no bridge loans" when I asked about
a mortgage on another pending move. I'm supposed to rent the house
from the seller until I move in! The seller is less than enthusiastic
since _they_ already have a bridge loan they want to pay off.
Anybody get DCU to bend on this? They currently have the lowest
rate going, otherwise I wouldn't care.
fred
|
11.255 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Thu Feb 18 1988 17:10 | 7 |
| I can't believe DCU has the lowest rate - shop around - have you tried
coop bank of concord - they gave me a bottom rate, a 90 day lock in, a
H.E loan on the new property at closing to serve as a bridge loan
(e.g., it was low-interest, and FREE), no tax escrow ( did have a high
down payment) and professional service with a smile.
Were that DCU could do the same...(sigh)
|
11.94 | | URSA::DOTEN | Glenn Doten | Thu Feb 18 1988 22:38 | 6 |
| RE: .19
Don't you mean $1.00 for using non-DCU ATMs? At least that is what
I am charged.
-Glenn-
|
11.95 | MY EXPERENCE | COMET::PAPA | | Fri Apr 22 1988 17:20 | 13 |
| I HAVE GOTTEN COPY CHECKS A COUPLE OF TIMES FAST AND NO CHARGE.
FOR REGULER CHECKING I LIKE DCU ITS CONVIENT AND I HAVE NEVER
HAD ANY PROBLEMS. FOR LOANS I USE THE TEXAS INSTRUMENTS CREDIT UNION
DCU TAKES TO LONG TO APRROVE AND HAS BEEN NOTHING BUT A HASSEL
HALF THE TIME THEY SAY NO. THE TI CREDIT UNION PROCESS ALL LOAN
REQUESTS IN 24 HOURS AND THEY HAVE NEVER TURNED ME DOWN.
A FEW MOTHS AGO I DEPOSITED A LARGE OUT OF STATE PERSONAL CHECK
IN MY TI ACCOUNT. THEY SAID I WOULD HAVE TO WAIT 10 DAYS FOR IT
TO CLEAR, I SAID I NEEDED TO DRAW ON IT BEFORE THEN SO WHAT THEY
DID WAS TRANSFER CASH INTO MY ACCOUNT TO COVER IT UNTIL MY
CHECK CLEARED AND TOLD ME I WOULD BE IN A WORLD OF S**T IF IT
DIDN'T CLEAR. DCU NEVER WOULD HAVE DONE THAT.
|
11.34 | you answer | BTO::CHARBONNEA_G | | Tue Apr 26 1988 15:56 | 3 |
| Will it do good for then to read these notes,you talk to thier
face and that does no good...you answer the question.
|
11.35 | Loan is not a "right" | ARGUS::BISSELL | | Wed Apr 27 1988 11:52 | 8 |
| ask to speak to a manager who is more likely to be able to give
you the corrct answer. To often the Clerk is willing to give you
the wrong answer because they dont know any better and they certainly
dont have the ability to modify the terms and conditions.
Just remember that the "right" answer for one trying to get a loan
may not be the same as one who has the money on deposit that you
chose to borrow.
|
11.36 | We keep hoping | TSE::LEEBER | Knock Knock! | Wed Apr 27 1988 18:02 | 6 |
| re: .34
Where there is communication there is hope. Where there is no exchange
there is no opportunity.
Carl
|
11.113 | nobody | BTO::CHARBONNEA_G | | Fri Apr 29 1988 16:18 | 19 |
| I UNDERSTAND WHAT BIG DEAL IS,
You have right to do as I do every week.
I have direct deposit so I know that the deposit go in on wednesday
afternoon so I use the tuch-tone system on thursday afternoon to
if the money was as I want it.
If you don`t have the tuch-tone system--you don`t work for DEC.
If you work for DEC and have the toch-tone system--some good person
should teach you the way to use it.
I had a little trouble the first time I user DCU and John Tilly
fixed it for me fast.
If I find A problem,I go fast to the DCU office and don`t leave
unless this taking care of first.(Even if I`m wrong they show me)
If you get payed thursday check the toch-tone system on friday.
As some said before John tilley is A good man and will help if you
give him A chance.....We had him in Vermont before....good man.
gus
|
11.157 | Still waiting after all these years!! | BOGUSS::SHORE | Jim Shore | Wed May 04 1988 22:01 | 1 |
| Did we ever get an answeer on the branch office in California.
|
11.158 | � DCU in Calfornia ? | SCRUZ::EGGLY_WA | | Mon May 23 1988 20:59 | 6 |
| Was talking to the DCU about a momth ago. They said they are ready
to open a branch in Santa Clara, CA (WRO). The only thing they
are waiting for is space in the WRO site. The said maybe October
1988.
Warren
|
11.37 | "Official" Definition? | TSE::LEEBER | Summer Fun!! | Mon Jun 13 1988 11:21 | 21 |
| General Comment on Official;
{...or funny what you think of on weekends.}
While it has never come up in this conference, I wondered "What defines
an Official DCU Response"?
It is my view that,
"Any WRITTEN communication from the DCU that is entered, as a whole
single base note or response or in parts corresponding to specific or
new notes topics, into this conference constitutes an "Official DCU
Response", where the DCU communication states the intention for the
entry to be made".
To date the "written communication" has been in the form of a letter
on DCU letterhead, signed by John Tilley. All of these letters has
stated the request that the "...enclosed information be entered...".
Comments?
Carl
|
11.123 | great benefits | RAVEN1::MANNE | | Tue Jun 14 1988 16:23 | 14 |
|
folks,
I just happened to call dcu to get interest rates on car loans.
I was stunned by their rates as they are not at all competetive
to local banks in South Carolina. I really dont understand why
they lend money on variable interest rate where the whole world
is dealing with fixed here. I also called a local credit union
here to get a rate. Their rate is 9.9 % fixed. Unfortunately, I
am not a member of that credit union and DIGITAL is not listed
as one of their companies to enroll as it has its own.
I guess dcu is one of the great benifits that employee can get
from DEC. Please shop around before you approach dcu.
suneel
|
11.124 | Neither a borrower nor a lender be.. | DR::BLINN | Put a REAL pinhead in the Oval Office! | Tue Jun 14 1988 21:47 | 11 |
| It always pays to shop around when you're looking for ANY service.
As a DCU member who doesn't have a car loan with them, or any
other loan for that matter, I'm pleased that they provide the
variable rate loans. This helps guarantee that I'll get a good
return on the money I've deposited (and that you or someone else
has borrowed) even if the market rate for loans changes. And,
while the rate can go up, it can also go down (not that that
looks likely anytime soon, if you believe the prognosticators).
Tom
|
11.125 | | SALEM::RIEU | Bill the Cat in '88 | Wed Jun 15 1988 09:09 | 3 |
| I've had loans with other CU's. All I had to do was put a few
($15) dollars into a savings account.
Denny
|
11.126 | Maybe, maybe not, you have to know the rules | DR::BLINN | Put a REAL pinhead in the Oval Office! | Wed Jun 15 1988 14:54 | 9 |
| It depends on the Credit Union. Some credit unions can allow
almost anyone to join; others cannot. It depends on, among
other things, whether their charter is federal or state or
whatever, and the applicable laws. So while you may have been
able to get a loan from some particular credit union by opening
a savings account (and, presumably, thereby becoming a member),
you may not be able to do that with other credit unions.
Tom
|
11.38 | Set Official Responses/From:21-jul/To:15-aug = {Disabled} | TSE::LEEBER | Summer Fun!! | Thu Jul 21 1988 18:51 | 19 |
| Hi folks,
I will be "off-line" for three weeks beginning 7/23 (Sat) and ending
8/14 (Sun). During this time (for vacation, training, etc.), the
supported POSTING path for the DCU will be unavailable to them. They
will continue to RECEIVE (via mail to Mark Steinkrauss) extractions
from this conference as long as the extraction host cluster remains up.
Please allow for this delay, when posting questions in the conference
for the DCU to answer. Remember, if its a barn-burner or just a
need for information, a phone call to Mary Madden (dtn 223-6735
x239) will make your request or question visible ASAP.
About to have... "Summer Fun!",
Carl Leeber
{Maintainer-of-vaxnotes-extraction-of-new-entries-to-dcu-chair}
Set mode = {GONE_FISHING}
|
11.159 | DCU in CALIF | BOGUSS::SHORE | Jim Shore | Mon Jul 25 1988 21:19 | 2 |
| Any futher word(s) on the branch in Santa Clara.......?
|
11.39 | Set Official Responses = {Enabled} | TSE::LEEBER | I'm Back! | Mon Aug 15 1988 17:03 | 11 |
| Hi Folks,
True to form, while I was out getting some R&R, the batch job that
relays the new entries to the DCU board chair died. I think entries
from 21-JUL-1988 to 1-AUG-1988 did go through. But some point after
that until tomorrow (at 2:20am EDT) nothing. The batch job has been
re-queued.
Carl
{Set mode = on_line}
|
11.40 | Will Cover All Missing Entries... | TSE::LEEBER | I'm Back! | Mon Aug 15 1988 17:06 | 2 |
| .... Oh yes, the restarted batch job (see .-1) will send anything
that was not previously sent to the DCU board chair. Carl
|
11.41 | wondering out LOUD | WORDS::BADGER | Follow the Sun Stream | Mon Aug 15 1988 23:13 | 13 |
|
I STILL continue to be confussed/amused that these notes be sent
to the DCU board Chairman, YET replies come from the PR person,
the former John Tilley, or the new one.
IF, yes IF the pr position satisifed us with answers, why does the
board chairman think we still write here? Why Mr board Chairman,
don't YOU respond to us?
And another I told you so, where are those who were looking for
office? where is the board now that elections are over. Do we
see them only once a year?
just wondering
ed
|
11.42 | | BEIRUT::SUNNAA | | Tue Aug 16 1988 10:24 | 14 |
|
Ed,
Note 2.15 deals with the question.
The Chair is a DEC employee. The agreement is that he will reveiw
the notes from the file and transmit summarized information of interest
to DCU.
The issue we were dealing with at the time is Security, and that
seemed the easiest way to handle getting questions and responses
back from DCU.
Nisreen
|
11.43 | not the same. | WORDS::BADGER | Follow the Sun Stream | Tue Aug 16 1988 13:38 | 13 |
| Thank you Nisereen, but I was mearly pointing out *THE* problem.
The chairman may receive these entries, but does NOT respond to
us.
I was also pointing out that *IF* the PR person slot *worked*, then
some of us would not be putting our complaints here.
ITS TIME THAT THOSE ON THE BOARD MADE AN EFFORT TO TALK WITH THE
DCU MEMBERS! and not just at election time.
ed
|
11.190 | Frustration overload | CHGV04::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Fri Aug 19 1988 19:21 | 5 |
| Is this list still current? I'm fed up to the point that I intend
to write each of these folks, and tell them WHY. If I don't get
action to resolve the problems, rather than taking my money and
run, I will do what I can to change all of these names. If it is
the only way to shake up DCU, I'll run myself!
|
11.191 | Probably not | EXIT26::STRATTON | Just Say No(tes) | Sat Aug 20 1988 17:37 | 7 |
| There has been at least one election since I posted 8.12.
I don't remember if all the incumbants were re-elected.
I think that was data we lost when this file had to be
restored from backup some months ago.
Jim Stratton
|
11.192 | Yes they were!!!! | CRUISE::JWHITTAKER | | Wed Aug 24 1988 10:51 | 5 |
| All incumbants were re-elected during the last election; by close
to a 2:1 advantage; incumbancy has it's advantages.
Jay
|
11.160 | Dad, are we there yet?!? | BOGUSS::SHORE | Jim Shore | Thu Sep 22 1988 00:45 | 5 |
| Well, we're sneaking up on the end of the second year, any word
yet on the California Branch.
Jim
|
11.96 | Saves dogwork | PRGMUM::FRIDAY | | Wed Sep 28 1988 14:03 | 19 |
| What I like best about DCU is that you can have your salary divided
into a number of pieces: Savings, checking, Xmas, Vacation, etc.
Yes, I could achieve the same effect myself, but it's nice having
it done for me.
Regarding cancelled checks, I find that NOT having them is an
advantage. Previously, I had boxes full of them and could never
find one without sorting the entire mess. Now all I need to do
is keep the carbon copies, and, if I really need a copy of the actual
check, DCU is maintaining them for me. (Since the carbon copies
are bound in books, they're also easier to manage).
Finally, I like the statement format itself. It's small, and generally
fits on a single page. My BayBank statement on the other hand,
never is less than two pages, even if I've not written a check at
all, and is difficult to read.
Rich
|
11.97 | check carbons are a pain | YODA::BARANSKI | Down with Official Reality! | Thu Oct 06 1988 15:51 | 4 |
| I *hate* check carbons. They are a pain in the ass to me. When I start a new
book of checks, I rip all the check carbons out.
Jim.
|
11.98 | | LDYBUG::PINCK | Amy Pinck, DTN=223-4335, Long Live Duck | Thu Oct 06 1988 18:09 | 2 |
| I thought that we could ask to have books with out them?
|
11.99 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Thu Oct 06 1988 18:42 | 7 |
| > I thought that we could ask to have books with out them?
you can, and I always have (cheaper too)
|
11.100 | I'll do that next time, thanks! | YODA::BARANSKI | Down with Official Reality! | Fri Oct 07 1988 04:31 | 0 |
11.101 | I love those check carbons! | KYOA::KOCH | Any relation?... | Fri Oct 07 1988 10:55 | 2 |
| Boy, you people have a lot of discipline! I got down on my knees to
thank God for the person who invented check carbons! To each his own...
|
11.44 | Possible Interruption of DCU access | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Mon Dec 12 1988 10:46 | 13 |
| Hi fellow DCU noters...
I will be on vacation after 12/16/88 (Friday) and before 01/03/89
(Tuesday), inclusive. The software extracting the new entries for the
DCU will be left running, as has been the past practice. Any
interruption of the job will not be addressed until I return.
A happy and safe holiday season to you all...
Carl Leeber
(maintainer of the batch extraction process and NOT the moderator of
this conference!)
|
11.45 | Keyword | BEIRUT::SUNNAA | | Thu Dec 15 1988 12:40 | 8 |
|
re -1:
It's Ms. Moderator - and keyword creation is enabled.
have fun..
Nisreen
|
11.46 | Murphy (a.k.a. the grinch) Got It! Process Up Now. | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Wed Jan 04 1989 10:38 | 6 |
| Its nice to know that Murphy of Murphy's Law fame was alive and well
over the holidays. The batch process "broke" Saturday (12/17/88).
Therefore, no new entries were sent to the DCU since then. The process
is now "on-line".
Carl
|
11.161 | (:^(} | BOGUSS::SHORE | Jim Shore | Sat Jan 07 1989 00:33 | 9 |
| Is there any word on weather or not there will be a branch opening
up in California.
A response would be greatly apperciated (sp?)!
Thanks
Jim
|
11.162 | Nearly 2 years later... | WRO8A::BLUM | | Tue Jan 10 1989 03:38 | 8 |
|
Thanks, Jim for keeping this note alive. IT'S BEEN NEARLY YEARS SINCE
I POSTED THIS NOTE! HOW ABOUT A RESPONSE, DCU OFFICIALS!!! EVEN A
SIMPLE I DON'T KNOW WOULD BE A REASONBLE RESPONSE.
Regards,
John
|
11.163 | DCU..EVERYWHERE!! | BAHTAT::PATTERSON | support your boys overseas!! | Tue Jan 10 1989 04:34 | 5 |
|
I sure hope so...plus branches in Reading, Paris, Far East,
Valbonne, etc. DCU Service Worldwide!!
KMP
|
11.164 | When ____ fly???? | SCRUZ::RICHARDS_DE | | Thu Jan 12 1989 14:13 | 8 |
| The first that I heard was that Santa Clara was scheduled for a
branch right after the DCU opened the Landover, Maryland branch.
That was quite a while ago (I think it is over 2 yrs). I called
DCU headquarters & tried to get some information earlier this month.
All I could get was it is being discussed. How much discussion
does it take?
Dennis
|
11.165 | | HAMER::JILSON | Door handle to door handle | Thu Jan 12 1989 16:26 | 3 |
| Gee only 2 years :*) I have been talking to the DCU for 4 years about
getting a branch to server the ~2000 employees in NYC but no action as of
yet (although it is always rumored to be REAL SOON NOW :*(
|
11.166 | Still Crazy After All These Years | BOGUSS::SHORE | Jim Shore | Fri Jan 13 1989 05:22 | 11 |
| After being told (see 7.1 or .2) that a DCU branch was to be in
place "by the end of the year" we all got "excited". That was in
Feb-1987 here it is 1989 and I CAN'T EVEN GET A REPONSE!!
Please let us know what's happening and if we can do something to
help get the branch opened.
Thak you for your support!?
Jim
|
11.167 | Just the messenger | EXIT26::STRATTON | I (heart) my wife | Fri Jan 13 1989 09:32 | 5 |
| re .1 and my statement that there'd be a Santa Clara branch
"sometime this calendar [1987] year" - sorry, I was just
repeating what someone from the DCU told me (as I recall,
I was asked to put that info here).
|
11.168 | Still waiting.......... | BOGUSS::SHORE | Jim Shore | Sun Jan 22 1989 03:36 | 8 |
| re: .16 not to worry. I also got the same info over the phone
when I called about something else and asked this question also.
What bothers me is that we don't get a response from someone at DCU
that knows, be it good or bad. I guess it's because we're just a
bunch of wild people out here. Of course THAT'S not true! Oh well,
Thanks for the reply,
Jim
|
11.169 | Maybe not DCU fault!? | WINERY::DOOLITTLE | it's only a model | Mon Jan 23 1989 11:32 | 6 |
| I asked DCU in Colorado Springs about a branch last week, and they said *they*
were ready - it was just a matter of getting someone in the South Bay to
allocate space. The Santa Clara facility apparently turned them down, but they
were talking to someone in Cupertino. Don't remember names off hand, though.
andy
|
11.47 | You Asked, "Anyone there"; The answer is... | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Mon Jan 23 1989 16:54 | 11 |
| Many topics contain the question about the DCU response rate of late. I
have contacted Mary Madden's office twice since the new year. I have
been assured by the person who answered her phone she is receiving the
extraction information. There was no stated reason for the lack of
responses.
I will check again when I return to my office (01/30/89).
Carl Leeber
(Not the Moderator, but the psuedo-connection to DCU.)
|
11.48 | .....DCU query,from "over the pond"! | AYOV10::CFLOYD | | Mon Jan 30 1989 06:28 | 7 |
| Watcha all,
Im a long standing employee of DIGITAL over here in the
U.K..........WE DONT HAVE THE BENEFIT OF A COMPANY CREDIT UNION....
Can any one tell me why there is [employee benefit differences]-when
we all belong to the same Company!!!!I worked in Canada for some
time,and benefitted by being in a Credit Union there??
............all the best, Chris.
|
11.49 | | ULTRA::KINDEL | Bill Kindel @ BXB1 | Mon Jan 30 1989 10:12 | 19 |
| Re .49:
The simple fact is that DCU membership is NOT part of the Digital
benefits package. DCU is a wholly-separate entity, which under
the National Credit Union Act is chartered to offer membership to
a group of people with a specified common bond. In the case of
DCU, Section 5 of the charter reads as follows.
"The field of membership shall be limited to those having the
following common bond:
Employees of the Digital Equipment Corporation who work in the
United States or Puerto Rico, or who are paid from Maynard,
Massachusetts, except foreign nationals at foreign locations;
spouses of persons who died while within the field of membership
of this credit union; employees of this credit union; persons
retired as pensioners or annuitants from the above employment;
members of their immediate families; organizations of such persons;
and Digital Equipment Corporation."
|
11.50 | DCU Still there, responses in progress (stay tuned!) | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Mon Jan 30 1989 14:48 | 12 |
| RE: .48
The following is a paraphrasing of my communication with the DCU on DCU
responses (or lack thereof) of late. The communication was with Mary
Madden.
[Yes, we have received the VAX Notes extractions. Thank you for
inquiring. During December, there was a problem receiving the
information. That problem has since been corrected.]
[Currently, a response is under discussion. I will contact you via
telephone when our response can be expected.]
|
11.170 | How About It, DCU? CA or NOT? | MTADMS::JOHNSON | Rob -- Ski COLORADO! It's AWESOME! | Mon Feb 06 1989 11:57 | 16 |
| Re: [All]
I'm sure by the time the DCU 'does' get around to putting an office in
the Santa Clara (or elsewhere within CA) area you all will have esta-
blished a 'more convenient' method of banking. Maybe 'then' and 'only
then' will they 'come after you' for your business. It's apparent from
their lack of response that they don't see you as future customer's and
don't feel they 'need' you. I wish I was in business for myself and didn't
need a customer base.
Keep plugging away! Maybe you'll get a response by the time your grand-
kids 'OWN' the DCU.
-- Rob (who wouldn't bank with the DCU if it were the 'ONLY' financial in-
stitution in the world!)
|
11.171 | Official DCU Response | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Fri Feb 10 1989 13:40 | 29 |
| This is an official response by Mary Madden of the DCU. The portion of
that response, dated 10-FEB-1989, that applies to this note topic is
included below. See note 2.22 for more information.
Whether you agree or disagree with the response from the DCU, please
either direct your comments to the DCU directly (dtn-223-6735) or
post your comments as a REPLY to this entry in this conference.
Carl Leeber
******************************************************************************
It is true that the Santa Clara branch was scheduled to open in the
Fall of 1988. DCU was prepared with both personnel and equipment to
open on that date.
To plan a new DCU branch, we project space and costs which satisfy our
short-and long-term operational goals. In February, 1988, we submitted
these requirements to Digital for approval. After extended discussions
with Digital officials, the Santa Clara facility management opted not
to sponsor a DCU branch.
Since we very much want to service our California membership locally,
we contacted Digital officials in Cupertino, CA. Presently, the
facility has our proposal under consideration. If we receive approval
soon, we could open a California branch in 1989.
In our continued efforts to service Digital Equipment Corporation
employees and their families, we also intend to open branches in
Littleton, MA. and Atlanta, GA. this year.
******************************************************************************
|
11.51 | DCU Responses Have Arrived; 10-FEB-1989 | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Fri Feb 10 1989 14:30 | 8 |
| Please be advised that DCU has responded to four topics. I have posted
each of three of the four responses as a reply to the base note
containing the topic. The forth topic has been placed as a reply to
note 103, since it's response seemed to cover a number of base notes. I
invite the moderator to relocate that reply if her insight or wisdom
guides her to a better related base note topic.
Carl {not-the-moderator} Leeber
|
11.172 | DCU in CA? | ULTRA::LO | | Fri Feb 10 1989 16:10 | 3 |
| Since DCU has no branches in CA yet, are DCU accounts treated as
out-of-state by local businesses? By the CA tax collector?
Will any of these change after DCU opens its first branch in CA?
|
11.52 | doesn'tseem complete to me? | WORDS::BADGER | Follow the Sun Stream | Tue Feb 14 1989 15:19 | 9 |
|
Carl, There were a LOT of issue raised in the period between the
last responces and this one. Should we be waiting for more responces
or was the four that you posted all? If that was it, is there any
way that they can be approached to address other concerns brought
up here and not just the ones they felt confortable about?
Their tactics seems rather clever, I hope I am wrong.
ed
|
11.53 | Please don't shoot the messenger | FINALY::CHAMBEHL | Charlotte Hornets - NBA champs ? | Thu Feb 16 1989 17:50 | 11 |
|
Carl,
Don't you think being the messenger for DCU living a bit on the edge? I
understand that you are relaying messages because you are a good guy, but
is there not Digital Employees on the BOD and would it not be easier for
a bonified Board of Directors Member to enter the notes. I only ask because
you always have to preface anything with "this is not me saying this".
Harry
|
11.54 | Right Thing To Do for now, Would welcome BOD involvement | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Fri Feb 17 1989 11:24 | 19 |
| In fact, the messages are sent to Mark Steinkrauss, a DEC employee and
BOD member. He forwards them on to dcu (hard-copy).
Why BOD members decline to participate directly in this conference has
been the topic for other discussions (notes herein). I don't know the
answer.
I saw a need to make a communication link that provided my fellow DEC
noters a way to get information from a credible source (dcu versus
hearsay). Without a "two-way" path, this conference was limited in
providing such information.
I believe that it is the RIGHT THING TO DO in this case. I would
welcome direct BOD (or dcu) participation in this conference, but
I don't see a "pull" to do it, and my gentle "pushes" have resulted
in... well, I'm still the messenger.
Carl
(not-the-moderator)
|
11.55 | Keeping the safety on...for now | FINALY::CHAMBEHL | Charlotte Hornets - NBA champs ? | Sat Feb 18 1989 11:27 | 9 |
|
I understand. Being somewhat far removed from GMA I have had some
problems dealing with DCU and have followed this conference in hopes
of seeing something that would justify me staying with DCU. To date
what I have seen does not give me much encouragement. Anyway I for
one appreciate your efforts.
Harry
|
11.56 | Batch Notes Extraction Sick, Doctor working on it! | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Thu Mar 30 1989 14:35 | 13 |
| Hello fellow DCU campers...
A disc gremlin on our system has been causing many wonderful aberrations
with mail, Nmail and, subsequently, the notes file batch extraction
process. I can not say what extractions have been successful since
Monday (03/27). This will possibly mean some responses posted may
not get extracted and forwarded to DCU via Mark Steinkrauss.
I will try to "re-sync" things when our system doctor has made things
well again (... and no its NOT a bug, virus, etc.).
Carl
a temporarily unhappy camper and not-the-moderator!
|
11.57 | Almost better? | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Wed Apr 05 1989 13:24 | 6 |
| RE: 57
Progress has been made on this problem. The extraction process is now
able to run without crashing.
Carl
|
11.173 | Why need a "sponsor"? | MISERY::BLUM_JO | | Mon May 15 1989 15:26 | 9 |
| RE: .20
Why can't DCU pay for it's own expansion, instead of trying to get a
facility to "sponsor" it?
Regards,
John
|
11.58 | Change in Schedule for Batch Extractions | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Wed May 31 1989 11:28 | 9 |
| Effective immediately, the batch EXTRACTION process servicing this
conference will be run every THIRD NIGHT instead of every night. This
action is only to reduce the number of times the extraction must
edited.
The reduced batch process provides pseudo-"communication" to the DCU of
new replies and notes. The extraction is purged (manually) of specific
identifying information before going to DCU.
|
11.59 | A Travel'n I Go, Erracticus Responstis (no it's not latin) | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Mon Jun 19 1989 18:51 | 13 |
| I will be off-site for the next few weeks. While I will try to access
the system and extract, clean and forward the batch extractions of new
conference entries at some random intervals, PLEASE be patient when
waiting for DCU to reply. Remember: They can't answer unless they have
been sent the question / issue. (But YOU CAN still CALL them 223-6735
x207- Mary Madden. {:^)>)
In a similar fashion, DCU responses will not be posted in a timely
manner until I return to a normal office hours on or about 7/10. I will
do what I can until then.
Carl
NOT-The-Moderator (The Great Communicator? No, No, No....Wrongo!)
|
11.256 | Colo Spgs? | BAHTAT::PATTERSON | support your boys overseas!! | Wed Jun 21 1989 07:56 | 5 |
| I hear that the DCU now has mortgage loans in Colorado Springs.
Has anyone had experience there? How about the time to close?
Thanks
Keith
|
11.257 | How are things now? | CGVAX2::PAINTER | Celebrate life! | Mon Jun 26 1989 19:59 | 8 |
|
Any updated experiences with DCU first mortgage loans? I have an
appt. with them this Thursday and am still doing a bit of shopping
around for rates, etc.
Thanks,
Cindy
|
11.60 | Vacation Time Suspension of Process | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Wed Jul 19 1989 10:35 | 10 |
| The extraction process for and replies from DCU will stop for the
next two weeks while I'm on vacation. Things should start again
on August 7th or so.
Feel free to call Mary Madden at (dtn) 223-6735 x207 with any
"barn-burners" that crop up while I'm out.
Carl
"On Vacation!"
|
11.61 | The Host Went Where? Oh, There It Is! Opps... | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Wed Sep 06 1989 10:44 | 13 |
| Opps!
The move of the conference host system had caused the temporary loss of
extraction of notes to DCU since 22-Aug-1989. It was, in fact, the DCU
that called and asked why they were not seeing any extractions. They
are watching!
My apologies for any delay in information flow this may have caused
to either the members or DCU. With luck the matter should be solved
at this writing.
Carl
(not the moderator - Batch extraction "service")
|
11.62 | First A bad disk, then Hugo. The Host is hurt'n... | TYCOBB::LEEBER | | Mon Sep 25 1989 12:16 | 8 |
| Extraction host system has been down since last Thursday (9/21).
The system is partially up now up now, but the batch queues are
still "broken".
When the host system is put back together, the extractions will resume.
Carl
(not the moderator, not the system manager, but extractor)
|
11.63 | Extraction back online, PROCESS (not notes) to move | TRAKEN::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Thu Sep 28 1989 11:42 | 13 |
| The extraction process batch job is back on line and all new entries up
to 27-Sep-1989 were sent this (9/28) am.
The batch extraction process presently resides on a large VAX cluster.
It has been proposed, and actions are underway to move the batch
process to the host system of the DCU notes conference it-self
(BEIRUT).
This will help insure that when the notes conference host is up, the
extraction process will be up also.
Carl Leeber
(not the moderator, just the extractor)
|
11.64 | Extraction Time out for the Holidays - FYI | TSE::LEEBER | Nobody Asked, Just My Opinion! | Fri Dec 15 1989 15:19 | 13 |
| It's that time of the year folks... for a holiday break. I will be out
between 12/21 and 1/3/90.
The batch extraction process will be running, but since the clean up is
a manual step, nothing will go to DCU until I return. Burning issues,
as always, can be sent to DCU by phone (dtn) 223-6735 x207.
Happy Holidays to all DCU VAX Notes-file Conference participants
and observers. PLEASE make them SAFE as well! Peace...
Carl
(Maintainer of the EXTRACTION process, and NOT the moderator)
|
11.227 | Loss of interest when closing an account! | BEIRUT::SUNNAA | | Mon Feb 12 1990 16:24 | 52 |
| Some of you might remember Jeff. He was an active noter in this file
before he left DEC. Well -- I received this mail message from Jeff with
information to post in the file. I am posting it unedited.
NJS
From: DECPA::"[email protected]" "Jeff Winston" 5-FEB-1990 11:49:27.64
To: beirut::sunnaa
CC: [email protected]
Subj: greetings from beyond
Hi. you may (or may not) remember me as an active member of the DCU notes fil
before I left DEC last year. well, I'm still a DCU member (primarily because
I live so close to the main branch). anyway, assuming you're still the
moderator (in not, and you can pas this on, great), - I wanted to pass on
to the notes file a little tidbit of info I discovered. Another in the
list of "you won't like to hear it, so DCU won't tell you)>
If you close a DCU account, DCU keeps all the interest you accrued since the
beginning of the quarter. So, unless you close an account on the first day
of the quarter, DCU keeps some of YOUR earned income.
Just thought inquiring minds would like to know.
/jeff
=================================================================
[Note: REPLY usually doesn't work, even though it appears to. To send
me mail, address it to:
nm%DECWRL::"[email protected]"
to use a logical, type
$DEFINE jeff_w nm%"DECWRL::""[email protected]"""
thanks /j
======= Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) =======
Received: by decpa.pa.dec.com; id AA25661; Mon, 5 Feb 90 08:46:57 -0800
Received: by GARP.MIT.EDU with sendmail-5.61/4.7
id <[email protected]>; Mon, 5 Feb 90 11:46:49 -0500
Received: by lsrhs (5.57/1.35)
id AA06346; Mon, 5 Feb 90 11:01:34 EST
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 90 11:01:34 EST
From: [email protected] (Jeff Winston)
Message-Id: <9002051601.AA06346@lsrhs>
To: beirut::sunnaa
Subject: greetings from beyond
Cc: [email protected]
|
11.228 | Interesting solution to stupidity! | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Tue Feb 13 1990 11:47 | 3 |
| Once again, there is a simple solution to such stupidity. Don't
close your account. Withdraw everything except the last $1.00, and
let DCU keep the account on their books forever!
|
11.229 | No big deal | MSD36::RON | | Tue Feb 13 1990 13:36 | 9 |
|
To be fair, other banks indulge in this lucrative practice as well.
The last time this happened to me (in 1978, some bank in Brookline
kept 25 buck of mine in **their** pocket), was the last time this
happened to me. Since then, I just make a note to myself, then close
accounts on the correct (for me) date.
-- Ron
|
11.230 | You can't always leave $1.00 in your account | JAMESB::BABIN | | Fri Feb 16 1990 01:33 | 9 |
| re .5
The concept is of still valid, but keep in mind that aside from
checking, most DCU accounts have a minimum balance from anywhere
between $5.00 (simple savings) to $100.00 (RSVP). Of course, in
these two examples, the higher minimum balance corresponds to the
higher interest rate. There may be other accounts with higher minimum
balances.
|
11.231 | Leaving a minimal amount doesn't solve the problem | BAGELS::LEVY | | Mon Feb 19 1990 13:00 | 12 |
| re: < Note 9.5 by POBOX::KAPLOW "Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982" >
> -< Interesting solution to stupidity! >-
>
> Once again, there is a simple solution to such stupidity. Don't
> close your account. Withdraw everything except the last $1.00, and
> let DCU keep the account on their books forever!
Except that after 12 months of inactivity, accounts are charged $2.50
per quarter. Simpler to just close it at the beginning of the quarter,
which is what I did. (They insist on mailing you a check by the
way.)
|
11.232 | One more "interest"ing story at DCU | AZTECH::JARRETT | | Mon Feb 19 1990 18:08 | 25 |
| Well, I had an "interest"ing experience with DCU this morning, they tried to
penalize me for interest I hadn't even earned!
A CD came due several days ago (7 to be exact) so I went in to close it out. The
clerk informed me that there would be a 30 day interest penality (rather than
the 7 day interest forfeiture I expected). To make a very long conversation
short, I reminded the clerk the CD was only 7 days old (DCU had automatically
renewed it on its due date) and it was against banking regulations to assess a
larger interest penality than been earned, but she insisted that was not the
case, so off to the manager I went. After a brief conversation, she agreed
that the maximum penality they could assess would be 7 days.
Back at the counter, after brief instruction by the manager, the teller asked me
to sign a CD closure form, which contained language to the effect that I was
agreeing to a 30 day interest penality. So I crossed out the 30 and replaced it
with 7 and signed the form. Well, needless to say another round of discussions
ensued about my modifying the form, insisting that the 7 day interest penality
is all they would charge (even though the document said differently). I
reminded her that in any legal dispute the written documentation takes precedent
over verbal agreements and that I was not agreeing to a 30 day penality, the 7
day modification would stand. Again the intervention of the manager was
required to resolve the issue.
One really has to question either the caliber or training these tellers get.
|
11.233 | where is it written? | REGENT::MERRILL | Call me. | Tue Feb 20 1990 11:54 | 17 |
| re: .9 You did right.
But have you ever thought about what a notes files BY THE TELLERS
would contain? "Those digits are such know-it-alls! I wish they'd
realize that we tellers can only do what we're taught to do."
It's true, tellers are put on with very little training. When I
go to a big bank regularly, I always wait for the head teller -
if another is free, I have to pretend to be reading the flyers!:-)
There ought to be some COMMON GROUND, such as the 'book-of-rules'
that the bank follows. Does anyone know what it is called? Can
we "customers" get a copy?
Rick
Merrill
|
11.193 | DCU BOD Candidates please introduce your selves | DECWET::DUNLAP | Ozix Ozkin | Wed Mar 14 1990 12:29 | 7 |
| Well, it's that time of the year again. I received my DCU ballot
and looked at the list of people to vote on to the BOD.
Who are these people? Do any of them read this notes file and want
to tell us about them selves?
-Kevin
|
11.194 | Voting deadline? | FSDB00::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Wed Mar 14 1990 16:34 | 3 |
| When is the voting deadline?
Bob
|
11.195 | Voting Information | WR2FOR::GRUBB_JA | | Wed Mar 14 1990 22:49 | 4 |
| I too am interested in information on the candidates.
Jim Grubb
Santa Clara CA
|
11.196 | Sorta answered my own question... | FSDB00::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Thu Mar 15 1990 09:20 | 6 |
| re: .17, Well I ask about the voting deadline, dreading a repeat of
last years mess, and my ballot shows up in the mail yesterday. I
haven't opened it yet, so I don't know what the deadline is, but at
least my vote should be counted this year.
Bob
|
11.197 | | BUNYIP::QUODLING | Gimme a Mail Jeep, and I'm dangerous | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:01 | 6 |
| The Voting Deadline is 5pm April 20,1990. The candidates have
presented write-ups of themselves along with the ballot papers.
What more do you need.
q
|
11.198 | Easy decision | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | It's on my list | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:27 | 5 |
|
I've already got it and sent it back. Out with the old and in with the
new!
Phil
|
11.199 | same discription, 7 different names | WORDS::BADGER | One Happy camper ;-) | Thu Mar 15 1990 21:38 | 8 |
| I've read the write-ups. Such little information to make a decision
on. I'm sure they are all nice people. But they seem to come
from the same cookie cutter. MBA, business admistration, etc.
And we need such people. But it would be nice to have just *one*
person who would best represent the interest of the common working
person. That choice is not available this time through the choices.
ed
|
11.200 | See also 206 | EXIT26::STRATTON | Honk if your horn is broken | Thu Mar 15 1990 22:25 | 2 |
| Topic 206 contains some more information on one of the
candidates.
|
11.201 | Where's my ballot (again) | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Tue Mar 20 1990 11:46 | 11 |
| Sounds like a repeat of last year:
1) No decent candidates, just the status quo
2) No ballot (yet)
Could someone who HAS a ballot list the candidates that are on the
ballot, denoting incumbants, board nominated, and petition
nominated choices, and maybe the 2 sentence biography that goes
with each? Thanks.
|
11.202 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Mar 21 1990 10:12 | 3 |
| Part of the problem is that the ballots are sent out bulk rate.
The post office doesn't treat such mail very seriously (OK, they
don't treat *any* mail seriously, but bulk rate is a real joke).
|
11.203 | another DCU ballot screw-up | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Wed Apr 11 1990 16:40 | 14 |
| I just got off the phone with Mary Madden's assistant (Sorry, I
didn't catch her name). It seems that DCU extracted a membership
list at the close of 1989 to send out the ballots. I moved in
January, and gave the DCU my new address. I've got all my
statements at my new address, but the ballot must have gone to my
old address. Since bulk rate isn't forwarded by the post office...
I've been promised that new ballots are in the mail for myself and
my wife. Anyone else not yet having a ballot should call Mary
NOW, as the deadline is near. After the letter I wrote to the NCUA
after last years election, I thought they might clear up some of
these problems. Silly me...
******** REJECT ALL THE INCUMBANTS! ********
|
11.204 | | FSDB00::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Thu Apr 12 1990 10:32 | 4 |
| I guess that means that if one joined DCU after 1-jan-1990 and before
the deadline, you would also be unable to vote.
Bob
|
11.65 | Time out for the Holidays - Extraction will be stopped - FYI | HPSCAD::LEEBER | | Wed Dec 12 1990 10:29 | 18 |
| Once again, it's that time of the year folks... for a holiday break. I
will be out from 12/21/90 to 1/7/91 exclusive.
The batch extraction process WILL BE STOPPED this year during my
absence. This is because my "extraction" cluster will be moved to a new
site. I will restart it upon my return.
As far as I know the host node for the VAX VMS Notes Conference on the
DCU will remain operational during this time period. So note away! Just
remember that your notes or replies won't be extracted until after
1/7/91 (nor will DCU "official" responses be posted).
No matter how you spend this time of the year, I wish you happy
holidays, peace, health and safety.
Notes file extractor (and not the moderator),
Carl
|
11.174 | The years pass on.... | WLDWST::VERBIL | | Thu Jan 10 1991 11:47 | 8 |
| RE: all previous replies about a Bay Area DCU branch....
I know you've heard this all before, but DCU officials were here in
early October 1990 (Cupertino - UCF) and *supposedly* will be opening a
branch here *or* installing an ATM linked to DCU.
Last I heard they are looking for space at this facility.
|
11.205 | its election time again... | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Thu Mar 14 1991 18:51 | 4 |
| Well, we just got our 1991 ballots. Only 5 candidates this year,
for 2 slots. Both incumbants are running for reelection. Anyone
know anything about any of the challengers? I'd like to see their
input here before I vote for someone.
|
11.206 | Challenger | MRKTNG::LUCIANO | RICH LUCIANO @TTB | Mon Mar 18 1991 17:06 | 14 |
| I am one of the non-incumbents running for the DCU board of
directors.
All I can promise is that as a board member, I will listen to the
DCU membership, communicate to the membership, and effect actions of
the DCU in the support of its members.
If you have specific questions, I'd be happy to answer them.
In the past, I have been a board member of the Polaroid Credit
Union. I have the experience, expertise, and new ideas that I think
are required in this year's election.
Rich
|
11.207 | Can you be more specific please | SMAUG::GARROD | An Englishman's mind works best when it is almost too late | Mon Mar 18 1991 20:09 | 6 |
| Re .-1
Is there anything about the DCU that you'd like to work to change. Or
are you happy with the DCU just as it is?
Dave
|
11.208 | So who won? | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Wed May 08 1991 19:38 | 2 |
| Anybody know who won the recent election? Anybody succeed in
bouncing the incumbants?
|
11.209 | incumbants reelected again :-( | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Wed May 22 1991 11:30 | 6 |
| Yesterday I called DCU, but couldn't access this conference to
post the information. Both incumbants, Mark Steinkraus and
Charlene O'Brien, were reelected. I haven't seen any vote totals
yet. If someone has more information, please post it here. Last
time, there were more total votes for non-incumbants, but the
incumbants were reelected beacuse of a 2-4 split.
|
11.210 | Should we propose a change to the "election" process? | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | It's on my list | Wed May 22 1991 13:35 | 14 |
|
I would like to suggest that DCU stop holding these "elections" which
cost money (that could use to do other things, like give a decent
return on savings). Just let us know when one of the incumbents quits
or passes away. Why do we persist in pretending that these positions
are attainable for anybody but non-incumbents???
I believe there needs to be a limit put on the number of consecutive
terms these people can serve. After an abscense they could run again.
I think we have seen with the DCU president that a long stay by the
same people may NOT be a good thing. Influxes of new ideas and energy
should be encouraged by the system. Instead it seems life-long
positions have been created.
|
11.211 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri May 24 1991 14:38 | 1 |
| I'm pretty sure the elections are required by law.
|
11.212 | | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | It's on my list | Fri May 24 1991 14:58 | 12 |
|
RE: .34
Yes, I'm sure they are. That section of my reply was pure sarcasm,
although not far from reality IMO.
The real suggestion was in the second paragraph. I wonder if limiting
the terms is possible? And if it is, how it could go about being done.
Would it require the gathering of x% of signatures to get it on the
ballot, just like non-board-approved candidates for the BOD? Surely,
this type of question won't be proposed by a current board member.
|
11.213 | | ULTRA::KINDEL | Bill Kindel @ LTN1 | Fri May 24 1991 16:27 | 22 |
| Re: <last few>
> The real suggestion was in the second paragraph. I wonder if limiting
> the terms is possible? And if it is, how it could go about being done.
> Would it require the gathering of x% of signatures to get it on the
> ballot, just like non-board-approved candidates for the BOD? Surely,
> this type of question won't be proposed by a current board member.
The DCU Annual Meeting and the election rules are spelled out in the
Bylaws (which have had a number of amendments in this area). According
to Article XXI, Section 1 of the DCU Bylaws:
"Amendments of these bylaws may be adopted and amendments of the
charter requested by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the
authorized number of members of the board at any duly held meeting
thereof if the members of the board have been given prior written
notice of said meeting and the notice has contained a copy of the
proposed amendment or amendments. No amendment of these bylaws or
of the charter shall become effective, however, until approved in
writing by the NCUA Board."
Offhand, I'd say the deck is stacked against us "outsiders".
|
11.214 | Can it be put on the BOD ballot? | GUFFAW::GRANSEWICZ | It's on my list | Tue May 28 1991 10:25 | 9 |
|
RE: .36
Thanks for that bit of info. These types of things usually are heavily
in favor of the status quo. It will be a cold day in h___ before the
BOD limits their own term. I wonder if it would be possible to get a
question put on next year's "election" ballot? I would think the BOD
might have a minor conflict of interest in deciding an issue like this.
Then again, they could surprise us.
|
11.215 | So what is new? | PHDVAX::GREBLE | I heard it on the NOTESvine! | Tue Jun 04 1991 17:37 | 11 |
| I worked for a Credit Union for 9 years and a Credit Union OEM for five years
before coming to DEC. In all of the Credit Unions I have seen the incumbents
are always re-elected. Sometimes it is because they are good people who have
helped the membership and deserve to be re-elected. However, most times it is
because (as in most elections) very few people actually vote. Therefore,
incumbents only need the votes of a few supporters and the Credit Union
Employees and their families who vote for the incumbents to save there jobs. I
have seen incumbents re-elected days before the NCUA closed the Credit Union
because of insolvency!
John
|
11.216 | Directors insurance? | LANDO::STYLIANOS | | Tue Jun 04 1991 19:41 | 9 |
| Does the Credit Union provide liability insurance for the directors?
Many corporations seem to provide liability insurance to their
directors that protects their assets in case of a law suit. If the DCU
does not one might think twice (or more times) before becomming a
director.
Tom
|
11.217 | Candidate | MRKTNG::LUCIANO | RICH LUCIANO @TTB | Sat Jun 08 1991 09:00 | 15 |
| FYI.....I have run for the DCU board 3 time...each time I have come in
one position behind the incumbents. I will continue run in future
years!
My basis for running will continue to be because I think I can bring
new ideas to the DCU and that I can represent the membership.
As always, I congratulate the winners of the election and look forward
to the next election.
One other point.....if I ever do get elected....I will not serve more
than two consecutive terms!
|
11.218 | nice election timing this year... | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Thu Jun 20 1991 15:55 | 19 |
| Here are the 1991 election results. I got them from Mary Madden
earlier this week:
Mark Steinkrauss 6830 incumbant re-elected
Charlene O'Brien 5160 incumbant re-elected
Richard Luciano 4406 challenger not elected
Theo Campbell 1832 challenger not elected
Leo Quinn 1133 challenger not elected
This represents a total of 9681 ballots cast. 62% of the votes
cast were for the two incumbants. Last time this number was well
under 50%, with both incumbants re-elected.
I can only conclude from this that the majority of DCU members
don't care that the DCU is being run into the ground. I find it
most convenient that the current scandal was kept under wraps
until after the election was over with, even thou it was known
earlier.
|
11.219 | A BOD RE-ORG IS NEEDED | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Thu Jun 20 1991 16:21 | 3 |
| I agree they should step down, and have a new election, if they win
again,so be it. With all the controversey swirling around, they
should do this TODAY!!!!!
|
11.220 | Speculation not Fact! | ROYALT::SHERWIN | Jim Sherwin | Tue Jun 25 1991 14:37 | 30 |
| In Note 8.41 POBOX::KAPLOW states:
> I can only conclude from this that the majority of DCU members
> don't care that the DCU is being run into the ground. I find it
> most convenient that the current scandal was kept under wraps
> until after the election was over with, even thou it was known
> earlier.
I too am upset and concerned about the current events relating
to the DCU, its former president and BoD's performance, as I'm
sure are most members who are aware of the situation.
However your statements re: 'keeping the scandal under warps prior
to an election' are pure specualtion on your part, unless you can
support them. Making such assertion in this semi-public forum
could be percieved as libelous and/or slanderous. Statements such
as these place the existence of this and other employee-interest
Notes conferences at risk.
Even under normal conditions, the expression of a great deal of
emotion can be found in this notes conference. These latest events
have raised the level of emotional content to a new level.
I believe it is in our and this Notes conference's best interest
to stick to the facts and if we must express our speculations,
identify them as such.
Jim
|
11.221 | be careful about accusations of libel | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Jun 25 1991 15:41 | 22 |
| re .43:
Let's use language precisely here. It is a matter of judgement that this
situation is a scandal. It would be speculation if one were to say that
the BoD *deliberately* kept it under wraps until after the election to
their own advantage in the election. HOWEVER, it is *not* a matter of
speculation to say that it *was* kept under wraps, unless one wishes to
assert that the BoD fired the DCU president before they found out about
the loan scandal. Assuming that the BoD fired him for cause, they knew
what the cause was, but they didn't tell us & still haven't. So they
did keep it under wraps. They may have had good reasons to do so, but
they did so. And does anyone care to argue that it was not, in fact,
convenient to them that the facts did not come out until after the election?
Lots of people have tossed around the terms "libel" and "slander" in
this notes conference. From my understanding, a written statement is
only libel if it is a) untrue, and b) uttered maliciously. I don't see
how either one applies to Mr. Kaplow's memo. I only wish everyone's
messages stated their concerns as clearly.
Enjoy,
Larry Seiler
|
11.222 | What will it take, people!? | GLDOA::REITER | | Wed Jun 26 1991 16:58 | 9 |
| Re: last few
Fascinating.....
how many credits towards a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree do I get for
following this conference?
\Gary
PS: Reply .43 talks about Digital policy, not "the law". Re-read it.
Believe it. We have an unbelievably patient moderator. Let's not push
our luck.
|
11.66 | Time Out For R & R; Extraction Process Continues - FYI | MOOV02::LEEBER | Carl MOO-1(ACO/E37) 297-3957(232-2535), U WANT MODELS? | Thu Jun 27 1991 10:05 | 9 |
| I will be out from 6/28/91 to 7/8/91 exclusive. The batch
extraction process will continue.
Please remember that your extracted notes or replies won't be sent
to DCU until after 7/8/91 (nor will DCU "official" responses be
posted).
Carl
Notes file extractor (and not the moderator),
|
11.175 | Wheres the Branch?!?!?! | WLDWST::MARTIN_T | Too Smooth | Mon Jul 29 1991 14:51 | 7 |
|
Jee whiz, its been QUITE a long discussion concerning a branch/ATM
I wish they would get their act together. Its their loss!!!!
|
11.176 | Wake up DCU! | PORT::NORDLINGER | DTN 521-3398 Western Region | Mon Jul 29 1991 19:08 | 18 |
| There are 3 buildings of people in Santa Clara, another in San Fransisco,
another in Cupertino, three more in Mountain View and Palo Alto and I'm
sure there are offices locally I've yet to discover. Further, The bay area
(aka Silicon Valley) hosts many events that draw visiting DEC people
throughout the year (Xhibition, Interop91 ect...).
A DCU branch is needed here or DEC ought to consider a more equitable
credit union.
When last back East, I asked who to contact in this regard and was
given this name:
Anne Connell Director of DCU Branch Administration
508-493-6735 ext. 203
dtn-223-6735 ext. 203
|
11.177 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Jul 30 1991 14:48 | 4 |
| Hey, it's only been 4 years give em time!
Denny ;^)
|
11.67 | Vacation schedule & Extraction... What a time to be away! | MOOV01::LEEBER | Carl MOO-1(ACO/E37) 297-3957(232-2535), U WANT MODELS? | Fri Aug 09 1991 16:55 | 9 |
| I will be out from 8/9/91 to 8/26/91 exclusive. The batch
extraction process will continue.
Please remember that your extracted notes or replies won't be sent
to DCU until after 8/26/91 (nor will DCU "official" responses be
posted).
Carl
Notes file extractor (and not the moderator),
|
11.68 | I did get those last hot entries out first! | MOOV01::LEEBER | Carl MOO-1(ACO/E37) 297-3957(232-2535), U WANT MODELS? | Fri Aug 09 1991 16:56 | 7 |
| Just to let you all know;
A special extraction containing the stripped topic replies since the
last regular extraction and those entered today before 3:00 PM was
forwarded to DCU. (See note 2.0 for normal extraction information).
Carl Leeber
Batched Notes Extractor
|
11.69 | Is there Nobody Else??? | CSC32::B_HARRISON | Bruce Harrison | Fri Aug 09 1991 16:58 | 4 |
|
Isn't there anybody else in the entire noting community that can keep
the flow of "information" going?
|
11.70 | I've been "IT" since April, 1987... Some info will still move! | MOOV01::LEEBER | Carl MOO-1(ACO/E37) 297-3957(232-2535), U WANT MODELS? | Fri Aug 09 1991 17:17 | 20 |
| RE: <<< Note 2.70 by CSC32::B_HARRISON "Bruce Harrison" >>>
Bruce;
I have been doing this as my "hobbie" since April 1987 (Note 2.9 or so).
I have looked for someone to help out but...
In past years "...the flow of "information" ..." was never this important that
a week or so of my absence was not a big deal. I suggest that the moderator might
be a willing volunteer on this specific topic, but I don't what to speak for
someone else.
Mark Steinkraus of DCU board receives the extractions directly. The DCU receives
stripped versions (see earlier replies to this note (2.0)). Mr. Steinkraus will
be receiving all extractions during the two weeks I'm gone. Only the DCU version
and posting of official DCU reponses stops while I'm out.
Carl
Just the extractor NOT the moderator!
|
11.71 | YOU can HELP! Or.. What's in a name? | MOOV01::LEEBER | Carl MOO-1(ACO/E37) 297-3957(232-2535), U WANT MODELS? | Mon Sep 16 1991 12:49 | 34 |
| Hi folks;
I need your help! As in HHHHEEELLLPPPPP!!!!!
As extractor of these notes and poster of the replies, the current increase
in communication has been staggering! Since Digital pays me to do a job,
THAT COMES FIRST. The result is that the clean-up of these extractions
(remove node and employee name) has resulted in delays in information being
sent to DCU.
YOU CAN HELP!
PLEASE try NOT to include Digital or DCU employee names in your text
discussion if you can help it. Some times initials will do. Sometimes the
name is important and must be included for it to have meaning to the
Digital employees that read this conference. However, this type of entry
is the hardest to find and remove or convert to initials.
The notes entry and reply headers themselves are fairly standard and these
can be removed with minimal effort (an LSE macro does the trick nicely).
Next difficult, is the author's "signature" at the end of the entry or
reply, this can be handled using a combination of editor macros and minimal
human input. The imbedded names are murder!
Use them when you must... but using them often as a matter of author
convience slows down extractions. I do NOT what to cramp anyone's noting
style, but IF you can have a little mercy on this humble extractor, it will
help make the noters input to DCU happen in a more timely manner!
Thanks,
Carl
Just the extractor NOT the moderator!
|
11.72 | | BEIRUT::SUNNAA | | Wed Sep 18 1991 12:56 | 10 |
|
Replies posted after 2.72 related to DCU/BOD access to this conference
or the discussion on extractions have been moved to a dedicated note
288.*
This note was being used for extraction announcements and would like to
seperate that from the topic that spawned as a result of 2.72
Nisreen
|
11.73 | Notes Extractions Suspended | BEIRUT::SUNNAA | | Fri Sep 27 1991 21:34 | 23 |
|
Due to recent events I have asked Carl Leeber (Notes Extractor) to
discontinue extractions of notes from the conference. The extractions
were stripped, edited and sent to DCU to respond to the issues, and
Carl in turn posted them in the conference under the appropriate note.
Just to avoid starting a big discussion on this, the reason for my
decision is that I do not feel that the process is serving the purpose
it was intended for, and therefore I do not see the need to continue
it.
All DEC employees have access to this conference, including the BOD.
However everyone is restricted (corporate policy) against passing on
information/notes from this conference to DCU or anyone else outside
the company.
Regards,
Nisreen Sunnaa
Moderator
|
11.127 | DCU IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT INSTITUTION. | USCTR2::FSITAR | | Tue Feb 11 1992 13:27 | 7 |
| Tom, DCU is a not-for-profit organisation. If it is, lets get the IRS
here fast. It should not be "competitive" just much better than
for-profit orgs. You have just confirmed that DCU is not a CREDIT
UNION. DCU has misplaced the trust of Digital which intended to offer
its employees a credit union as one more benefit.
Francis.
|
11.128 | | MIMS::PARISE_M | | Fri Apr 24 1992 12:08 | 15 |
|
I also am a DCU original member. I welcomed the idea of being able
to utilize a safe repository for my modest savings. Certainly, a
primary impetus to join an employee credit union was the notion that
loans and other "banking" services would be offered to the employees
at rates *below* those of regular commercial institutions. I cannot
honestly say that I have ever seen that original notion realized.
I sincerely hope that the new BOD will take the necessary steps to
help restore some of those original goals and ideals.
This credit union, for whatever reasons, lost sight of its real
responsibility. It had better get its myopia corrected fast.
/Mike
|
11.129 | Competitiveness | NETATE::BISSELL | | Fri Apr 24 1992 12:31 | 28 |
| I think that it is time to ask the DEFCU to re-look the way it does business.
While it is obvious that the industry is in some turmoil there should be some
priority changes.
Most of the sources of income and costs of doing businees are very similar
between a C.U. and a Bank. You have to borrow low and loan higher to be able to
cover your expenses of personnel, buildings etc. Banks also have the
responsibility to make a profit for the shareholders. If the C.U. is
properly managed by the BOD and the Management staff the "profit" should be
returned to the members in the forms of lower loan rates and higher interest
rates on deposits.
We should expect to see some open communications of how this new board will
achieve their goals and what those goals are and what the time-table is for
doing so.
A good mix of candidates has been selected by the members to represent us and
they have the obligation and responsibility to meet the trust that we have
placed in them.
I am willing to hang around a little longer but I want to see and ACTION PLAN
of what is being done to fix the problems around communication and around the
competitiveness of the DCU.
The campaign is over - the results are in - now it is time to deliver on the
campaign promises.
Good Luck but quickly
|
11.130 | Survey those who left the DCU... | BTOVT::EDSON_D | that was this...then is now | Fri Apr 24 1992 13:08 | 12 |
| A survey of those who left DCU might be somewhat revealing. I
don't know how much time and energy should be put into something
like this, but it might prove to be valuable information.
I'm sure the survey would point out less attractive interest rates
in savings and less attractive loan rates could be the major reason,
but it may also point out other reasons.
I would sure like to see the DCU become MORE than competitive in these
rates. I mean, isn't that what a credit union is all about?
Don
|
11.131 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Still a slave of Congress | Fri Apr 24 1992 14:54 | 7 |
| > I cannot honestly say that I have ever seen that original
> notion realized.
I seem to recall that in the early '80s (83?,84?), DEFCU was pretty
competitive. But since then, I agree.
Tom_K
|
11.132 | Just think | VSSCAD::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Fri Apr 24 1992 15:30 | 13 |
| Re: .17
I was thinking about this yesterday when I saw the financial statement from
Ms Shapiro. Imagine, if you will, what our equity, profitability, loan
divident rebates, savings dividend bonuses, and Visa card interest rates would
be today if the whole Mangone thing had not occurred.
It has set us back more than 10 years.
We are a credit union with two broken legs. But the good news is, our
crutches, ordered in November, arrived yesterday.
Elaine
|
11.133 | | AOSG::GILLETT | Suffering from Personal Name writer's block | Fri Apr 24 1992 15:43 | 7 |
| > We are a credit union with two broken legs. But the good news is, our
> crutches, ordered in November, arrived yesterday.
An absolutely *great* characterization. I love it.....
Still chuckling,
./chris
|
11.134 | REAL QUALIFIED CANDIDATES!!! | STAR::BUDA | DCU Elections - Vote for a change... | Fri Apr 24 1992 16:03 | 23 |
| I would ask everyone to think about a simple statement:
'There is no such thing as a simple fix'
It will take time. We need to store up reserves, hopefully in a slow
but consistent manner. It will take us a couple years to get to a
point where we have the excellent rates that are needed.
My *GUESS* is a couple years to recover fairly well. The next year
will be swabbing the deck, keeping the boat headed straight and keeping
away from storms.
I do not expect the instant low rates. In time - YES. Work needs to
be done and we have the people to do it.
I do want Phil to keep looking around for problems, so we can put some
insecticide on them ASAP. Paul can use the broom on the cob webs.
This is an exciting time in DCU's life. The 'REAL QUALIFIED
CANDIDATES' have been chosen by the membership. We have the most
'QUALIFIED BOD' possible. This is the REAL thing!!!
- mark
|
11.135 | | INDUCE::SHERMAN | ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 | Fri Apr 24 1992 23:48 | 9 |
| A note a while back mentioned checking with those that left. More than
that, I think that the folks that left should be included in surveys
and courted by DCU. Sure, they can't be expected to come back
immediately. But, they NEED TO KNOW that DCU wants them back and will
try its best to serve their needs as THEIR credit union. It will take
time, but this is necessary for DCU to survive in the long run. This
experience might also help Digital learn a few things too, I suppose ...
Steve
|
11.136 | One who left... | 11SRUS::MARK | Waltzing with Bears | Sat Apr 25 1992 01:28 | 33 |
| Let me offer the perspective of someone who left. I was, until late
last fall, saving for a house. Until last August, when the infamous choices
brouchure came out, I had all my banking business with DCU. The day I recieved
the choices brochure, I took a vacation day and went shopping for a bank. Note
that had that been my only issue with DCU, I probably wouldn't have left until
I found out some of the stuff that came along later. While I liked the
convienience of DCU, and the ZKO branch staff were great, there were problems
with DCU. My dealings with people in headquaters had been very unsatisfactory
(see my reply to the note about ATM cards and P.O. Boxes). The savings and
loan rates were no longer competitive, and they were no longer pay interest
on share draft accounts with less than $1000. Still, they were in the building
I worked.
Last August, I moved a five figure amount out of my DCU accounts, into
a local bank. I now get better savings rates, have better loan rates available
(at least before DCU lowered them recently---haven't checked since then), have
NO foreign ATM fees, and a banker that seems to care about my business, even
though there's a lot less money in the accounts now that I've bought a house.
Oh, and interest is paid to my accounts monthly, rather than quaterly. Last
week, I went in to talk to my banker about a problem with my statement. She
fixed it immediately, and then asked me about something we had discussed the
last time I was in---in January! The fact that she remembered our last
conversation, three months ago, convinced me (maybe I'm gullable) that my
business is appreciated there.
I was planning, had this election gone otherwise, to pull the rest of
my business (car loan and Visa card) from DCU. Seeing the makeup of the new
board makes me hopeful, and I'll continue to watch DCU. To be honest,
however, it's going to take a lot to tempt me back from my new bank. In
DCU's favour is the fact that I'm hoping that they can do it.
Mark
|
11.137 | | AOSG::GILLETT | Suffering from Personal Name writer's block | Sun Apr 26 1992 23:24 | 21 |
| re: last
Many folks pulled money out of DCU as much out of protest as out
of fear for the solvency (or lack thereof) of DCU when "all this"
began over a a year ago. I know that my fiance and I pulled a
rather large hunk out as much out of frustration with DCU as with
anything else. I hope that people who removed money out of protest
will now repatriate their money and entrust the new board to
handle it with proper diligence.
Other people, as Mark wrote in the last note, pulled out money
and went elsewhere because they got a better deal. It's going to be
hard for DCU to win these folks back, but I have faith that over the
long haul, the "new DCU" *will* be able to win your business back.
Caveat: It took a long time for things to get bad enough to see
the light of day. It took a long time to effect a change in DCU.
It will take your new board a long time to get all their work done.
Please be patient....
./chris
|
11.138 | question... | AUKLET::MEIER | Where do the mermaids stand? | Mon Apr 27 1992 11:40 | 10 |
| I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask or not, but...
Mark, in reply .22, said that his new bank has no foreign ATM fees. Which side
of the network makes these decisions? I have an account at Baybank, and one
at DCU, and I need to pay a fee to take Baybank money out at the DCU ATM, and
a fee to take DCU money out at the Baybank ATM (both Cirrus network ATM's). If
DCU were to remove "their" fee, which transaction would it affect? Or am I
asking the "wrong" question?
Jill
|
11.139 | | 11SRUS::MARK | Waltzing with Bears | Mon Apr 27 1992 12:02 | 18 |
| Re: .23
I think you missed the point, Chris. I left, not because I got a better
deal, but because I was frustrated. I now realise that I have a better deal,
so I'm inclined to stay where I am. This will be the case until where I am
frustrates me enough that I'll look elsewhere, or DCU convinces that it's now
a better deal.
Re: .24
The foreign ATM fee is levied by the financial institution that issues
your ATM card. In your example, if DCU were to remove their foreign ATM fee,
your could take money out of your DCU account at a BayBank ATM with no fee.
I currently use my new bank's ATM card to take money out of my bank
account from a DCU ATM without paying a fee.
Mark
|
11.140 | | FIGS::BANKS | VMSMAIL: Its as good as it gets! | Mon Apr 27 1992 12:14 | 13 |
| I think the question's more relevant to how the bank in question wants to cover
its expenses.
Without knowing for sure, I'd speculate that if any bank wants to use another
bank's ATM network, then that other bank is going to charge for use of its
network. After all, the maintenance and operation of an ATM network ain't for
free, and a bank gets very little value added by letting some other bank make
use of its network.
Therefore, whatever bank you sign up with is going to have to pay in some way
or another for you to be able to do transactions on someone else's ATM network.
The question is, do they bill you directly (such as DCU does), or do they hide
the expense behind some other fee, or lower interest rates, etc?
|
11.141 | | FIGS::BANKS | VMSMAIL: Its as good as it gets! | Mon Apr 27 1992 12:18 | 13 |
| Oh, one other data point about ATM cards:
I was out in the middle of East Armpit, Maine a couple months ago, and found an
ATM for an emergency cash infusion. After I'd setup the transaction, I got
a screen informing me that I'd be socked a service charge of $1.00, since I
was using a card foreign to that Bank.
"I knew that", I figured. Wasn't until I got back to the car that I realized
that they meant that it was a buck in addition to whatever my bank was going
to do to me. Therefore, $80.00 for me, $1 for East Armpit Savings and Loan,
and $1 for DCU.
There's no point here, other than "it can happen".
|
11.142 | ATM transaction charges | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Mon Apr 27 1992 12:27 | 26 |
| The way it was explained to me, the issuer of each bank card makes a
contract with the people who run each bank machine network to let their
cards be used on the network. I believe the terms are mostly or entirely
a flat fee. So the bank that issues your card pays for your ability to
use it remotely, but doesn't pay per transaction. I suspect that most
banks deliberately set the transaction fees to make money on them -- it is
a service, after all, that costs them more than if you use their own machines.
Should the DCU charge transaction fees? On the one hand, it is a service
that costs the DCU money. But on the other hand, those fees have always
caused me to keep part of my money in a bank (first BayBank and then People's)
so that my wife can withdraw money without a transaction fee -- there are
no DCU branches on her normal rounds. If the DCU hadn't had transaction
fees, then I would probably have stuffed all my money into the DCU when I
closed out my BayBank accounts, instead of opening accounts at People's.
If many others do the same thing, then it isn't obvious to me whether the
DCU makes money from its transaction charges. Encouraging people to use
two vendors doesn't sound like good strategy.
It's an interesting question for those who manage DCU to consider, but I
would assume that they'll keep the transaction charges for now. However,
once some of the short term problems are resolved, I think they should
consider whether transaction charges are really helping the DCU.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
11.143 | Thank You DCU! | MCIS2::COLLETON | THE THIEF OF BADGAGS | Wed Apr 29 1992 09:02 | 9 |
| I just recieved a $4000 personnal loan from the Rockland Credit Union
at 11.9% intrest rate. No co-signer No collateral just my signature
and my track record of paying back past loans to other insitutions.
Last summer I applyed for a $1000 personnel loan at 16+% at "MY" DCU
which got turned down. I hope the new board will look into what
consitutes a real risk at defaulting loans.
Bill
|
11.258 | | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150kts is TOO slow! | Thu Jul 27 1995 12:00 | 3 |
| Note 667 (Mangone trial) was consolidated with 665 (Mangone trial)
Bob
|