T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1815.1 | first, build a boatshed .... | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Nov 27 1991 13:23 | 37 |
| Oy vay! You do have a major problem. First, I think that the WEST folks
do telephone consulting. I'd call them. One of their newsletters had a
article describing repairing the delaminated deck of a Swan by drilling
holes and injecting epoxy. The amount of work was absolutely staggering.
However, if the balsa in your deck is wet and rotten, injecting epoxy
isn't likely to work very well. The strength of a cored deck is partly
due to its thickness -- stiffness increases with the cube (I think) of
the thickness. Simply adding more layers of fiberglass (or whatever)
will probably not restore the original stiffness of the deck. Plus, you
will add a lot of weight to the deck, which is not desirable.
Back to the Swan: at the end the owners concluded (as I recall) that it
would have been better to cut away the top skin of the deck, remove the
balsa wood, install new balsa (or airex or whatever), and laminate
a new top skin. This is, in fact, what I'd suggest you do. The work
could be done in sections or small areas at a time. This would make the
work easier and also make it easier to maintain the contours and
fairness of the deck. Our Valiant had some delaminated areas in the deck
(manufacturing defect) that were repaired this way several years ago.
You can't tell where the top skin was cut away and the repairs done.
Practical Sailor has also briefly discussed this problem from the
perspective of having the work done. The unpleasant conclusion was that
having a boatyard do the repairs would likely cost far more than the boat
is worth. The materials to do the repairs won't be inexpensive, but
labor is another story. Only a few square feet of our deck needed
repairs and then, of course, all of the non-skid areas had to be painted
to hide the repairs. The labor bill was $4000 or $5000 back then. Other
estimates for the same work were as much as three times higher.
Oh yes, you might look at Alan Vaitses' book on repairing fiberglass
boat. He discusses repairing delaminated decks.
With sympathy,
Alan
|
1815.2 | Oh well.... | 3D::FGZ | Federico Genoese-Zerbi -- Flamingo 2D DDX | Wed Nov 27 1991 13:31 | 9 |
|
Something similar to this happened to a friend of mine. The cost of repairing
the delamination came to more than his 21 year old boat was worth--as Alan
suggested may be the case with your boat. Given the state of the used boat
market, perhaps you're better off looking there instead....I know it's hard to
say goodbye to an old friend...
F.
|
1815.3 | Worth a try...? | MILKWY::WAGNER | Scott | Wed Nov 27 1991 13:47 | 20 |
|
Hmmm... if these are only side decks, not deckhouse, you're only
talking a foot or so wide by 4 or so feet??? I wonder if peeling back
the top glass, digging out the rotten stuff, replacing with Airex or
some such, then some prefab nonskid? Maybe worth a shot, especially if
you don't have a buyer banging down your door.
Unless, of course, this area contributes to integrity/rig strength.
I played with some freebie material a while back, Nomex? I think,
fixing a rotted dinghy (glassed over mushy nonmarine plywood) and the
seats I installed were, at about 3/8", the strongest part of the boat.
Yeah, big deal, I'm comparing to something like gelcoat over wet
cardboard...
Anyway, might be worth playing with.
New England Plan: 6 months to play, 6 months to fix...
Scott.
|
1815.4 | Here what I've done | TUNER::HO | | Wed Nov 27 1991 16:17 | 52 |
| Water logged balsa cores are a common problem with the kind of boat I
have - an Etchells. Frequent relocation of deck mounted hardware
without careful filling of the resulting holes is the most frequent
cause. Also the light construction and the general abuse the boats get
from hard racing don't help.
Here's what most of the owners do when they can't stand the sponginess
any more:
1. Outline the area of damage and extend them so you have reasonably
rectangular sections to work with.
2. Get a router, set the depth to penetrate the deck's top skin of
fiberglass. Route along the outline you've created in (1).
3. Peel back the layer of fiberglass over the damaged area.
4. Scoop out the waterlogged balsa.
5. Clean off the exposed surface of the bottom skin that's now
exposed. Glass over any holes or thin areas.
6. Get enough new Balsa core to replace what's been taken out and glue
in place with epoxy resin.
7. Bevel back the fiberglass surrounding the new core.
8. Laminate a new topsskin on, replicating the original layup. This is
usually a layer of mat and several layers of cloth. You can tell by
inspecting the layer that was removed. You'll probably want to build
up slightly above the surrounding level.
9. Sand everything flush and smooth.
10. Paint with polyU or gelcoat.
11. Tape off what you don't want to be non skid.
12. Mix non-skid granules in the same paint used before and apply to
the taped off area.
If you have molded in non skid, the repair won't look like the
original. But if you're careful, it'll look OK. Or you can paint and
re-nonskid the whole deck. This isn't rocket science but it is very
time consuming. Figure on 5 - 8 days of work. Depends on how neat you
want to be. About $300 for materials should be enough. Definitely a
character builder.
Hope your bottom's not blistering too.
- gene
|
1815.5 | Been there, Done that... | FUTURS::BARKER | Now @NEW, ex. RYO,UCG,SBP,RES & REO | Thu Nov 28 1991 06:08 | 15 |
| We had the same problem on our ( then ) 17 year old Scampi. The
solution was to remove the inner skin ( i.e. the cabin head-lining )
in large panels and scrape away the waterlogged foam ( not balsa in
this case ). This was then replaced with new foam that was glued into
place and the inner skin was then glued to that, and held in place by
props until it dried. The joins were then covered by wooden strips.
To prevent further problems, we then painted the deck with epoxy paint,
and sealed any possible gaps. 5 years later, things are all OK.
The work was all done profesionally ( by the Elephant Boatyard, for
those reading this in the UK )
Chris
|
1815.6 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Sun Dec 01 1991 22:41 | 5 |
| See Chapter 5 in The Fiberglass Boat Repair Manual by Allan H Vaitses,
International Marine Publishing Co, 1990. He points out that while you
can replace the deck core from underneath, overhead laminating is very
difficult to do properly. I wouldn't even attempt it, for fear of
dripping resin in my eyes if for no other reason.
|
1815.7 | did that, worked well. | ICS::R_GREEN | Ron Green 223-8956 | Mon Dec 02 1991 10:53 | 22 |
| reg alan and gene advise
I tried that process on Steel Strings this past spring.... after first
getting the estimate from a fibreglass guru. The boat wasn't worth the
price he was asking and he knew it. His advise was to try it myself.
It was painstakingly slow to do. Didn't want to screw it up too badly
and didn't want to take out more than was necessary. Cutting the first
slice into the deck was about the hardest thing.
The results are great! Stiff deck and a smooth surface. I used BONDO
rather than balsa as a filler. Advise was that bondo would be easier
to work with, inasmuch as the balsa is not just balsa but is really
heavily impregnated with resins. I think I went through 3 cans of the
stuff. Got to work quickly, though.
Do a section at a time. Drying it out once opened up is made easier by
a hair drier.
The pumps for the resin and hardener were indespensible. The materials
are quite goopy. The pumps made the mixing quite easy and reduced the
chance of getting a 7x1 or a 3x1 mix.
|
1815.8 | peelback sounds skill-intensive. | HANNAH::SEARS | Paul Sears, DSG1-2/E6, dtn 235-8452 | Mon Dec 02 1991 12:39 | 36 |
| First, let me thank you all for the responses. And Sympathy.
I have a question on the strength vs. flexibility of delaminated
structures. How much strength has a delmainated deck lost? 80%, 50%,
more? If it's not that much of a loss, then i can probably live with
the deck as it is. I only use Cachalot for bay and near-costal cruising
(Long Island to Boston), and if i start getting lotsa green water over
the foredeck, the fertilizer has already hit the ventaliting device by
that time. While flexible decks detract from resale value, the best i
could hope for at this time is $4k - $5k anyway.
I think the foredeck may not be laminated, as it was a little squishy
when i bought the boat in '79. I don't think it's gotten too much worse
since, but i can't really remember. The side decks, however, used to be
nice and solid, and now have many squishy areas.
Gene: how big an area(s) did you repair using your outlined method? I
can see it working on small (less than 100 square inches) areas, but
does it scale up to larger areas (e.g. 2-4 sq ft)? At any rate, using
bondo or ballons in epoxy as the filler seems like a win if one minds
the time before it sets up.
However, i'm still interested in simply layering up to 1/4" of
laminates on all the foredeck and most of the sidedecks. I'll contact
WEST and see what they say and report back to this note. If the weight
is kept to less than 2 lb/sq-ft then the total new weight would be in
the 100 lb range, and that's not too much for a non-racer that already
displaces about 4000 lbs. loaded
We'd like to get a couple more safe years out of Cachalot, and still
interest someone to take it off our hands at that time. So although i
could just live with it, maybe a little work now might save more down
the road.
tnx,
paul
|
1815.9 | | STEREO::HO | | Mon Dec 02 1991 14:10 | 28 |
| To answer .8's question on the size of the area repaired - about 6 sq.
ft. were fixed this way. Some owner have done their whole decks - 20
sq. ft. this way. For a small area, a utilty knife run back and forth
around the affected area is enough to pentrate the top skin. Just cut
a rectangular section using a straight edge for a guide.
Strengthwise, I've forgotten the details but isn't the stiffness of the
deck exponentially proportional to the thickness? If the core's gone
so isn't the thickness. My guess is a lot of the strength's gone.
Whether that means anything or not is debatable. One of the oldest,
softest Etchells had an excellent record in all kinds of conditions
this year. But it can be disconcerting to feel the hull working in the
waves.
I've used filler on small sections that needed recoring but hadn't
thought of trying it on large sections. But if it works OK, it will be
a lot easier to obtain than balsa core.
Because the stiffness of the deck is so dependent on thickness, it may
take many layers of add'l glass to restore integrity if the old core is
left in place. Also, rotted core tends to liquefy and ooze out at
random places. The accompanying smell can also be real fragrant.
This isn't so much a high skill undertaking as it is a high aggravation
one. One thing to check out with the poor economy is free lance help
from former boatyard employees.
- gene
|
1815.10 | | FUTURS::BARKER | You can't teach a new dog ULTRIX | Tue Dec 03 1991 03:38 | 13 |
| Our repair ( the one done from inside ) covered the whole foredeck
( from the mast to about 2 feet from the bow ), and the top of the
coachroof ( which is very wide on a Scampi ), right back to the
companionway.
The cockpit floor had also gone soggy, but this wasn't laminated, so
was reinforced with a piece of marine ply epoxied on the underneath.
If your balsa or foam filling is soggy, try and make sure that the
leak is fixed before it is all put back together.
Chris
|
1815.11 | another way | TALLIS::DOLL | | Tue Dec 03 1991 12:16 | 15 |
| I repaired a one foot sq area on my boat. I didn't want to pay the
yard to do it. When I purchased the boat I had the yard do a similar
size spot for aroud a grand. The work was hot, dirty and for a large
area this wasn't feasible or relieable working overhead.
I wouldn't come from the top because you will never get a good finish
for a large area. If I had to do it I would consider the following.
1. If the deck is screwed on as many are, disasemble it and flip the
cabin top.
2. If the keel can be removed flip the whole boat.
This may seem extreme but it is a much quicker working and cheaper if
you pay a yard to do part or all of the work.
I cut through the glass with a carbide ?? disk on a 1/4"drill and
removed the core.
Not knowing the value of the boat I'd estimate its not worth the effort.
|
1815.12 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Dec 03 1991 12:44 | 15 |
| re .last:
Once you've replaced the core material and relaminated a new top skin,
you needn't worry about matching the patch to the rest of the deck.
Just paint the entire deck, which isn't difficult -- I've been able to
get a good smooth finish with a white two-part polyurethane applied with
only a roller. Removing a deck or rolling a boat upside down would be
vastly more work for any boat larger than a daysailor.
With a little luck, you can cut away only non-skid areas, which means
only repainting only non-skid areas, which is especially easy since
you're not trying for an unblemished, glossy finish. Our deck was
repaired this way. The non-skid was painted white to (almost) match the
original gelcoat. I now wish we'd had the non-skid painted light gray to
reduce glare from the sun.
|
1815.13 | the zen of boat maintenance | BOOTES::R_GREEN | Ron Green 223-8956 | Thu Dec 05 1991 11:50 | 9 |
| re: skill -
hey, i'm a no skill guy. this took time and patience, rather than
initial skill. got to take less and less time, the more i did, though.
good way to become one with your ship, into the karma of the sloop, so
to speak.
ron
|
1815.14 | Peeling seems the concensus | HANNAH::SEARS | Paul Sears, DSG1-2/E6, dtn 235-8452 | Thu Dec 05 1991 12:25 | 26 |
| Again, thankx for the ideas.
Although a byproduct of Bob was higher boatyard employment, the idea of
trying to find a freelancer sounds reeeeal good.
The leaks that caused the delamination have been fixed, but fixing them
is a process, not an event. That is, deck fittings need checking and
often rebedding almost yearly, or more often. For balsa-core decks
owners, i'd suggest Preventative Maintenance often.
The non-skip is molded into the deck, and is fairly widespread. This
will make things a little messy on the finish job, but if Alan can dare
paint the deck on his beautiful Valiant, i can try it on my 26 year old
Ariel.
re: skill - i have moderate skill, but not great. However, time and
a workarea may be tough. The comment someone voiced (typed?): "First
build a boathouse..." may come true to a certain extent. The boat's in
the backyard, so a few PVC pipes, a new tarp and a space heater may be
enough.
If WEST doesn't have a better suggestion, i might be apeeling....
tnx,
paul
|
1815.15 | epoxy plugs to avoid core moisture? | MAST::SCHUMANN | | Fri Dec 06 1991 09:26 | 37 |
| Will the following approach reduce the risk of water getting into the core?
Wherever a screw is put into (or through) the deck, drill a oversize hole, fill
with epoxy, drill hole through epoxy, put screw into (or through) epoxy.
I need to rebed my stanchions, and I'm thinking of doing it this way.
Questions:
Does this work?
How much should I oversize the hole?
Will this weaken the screw holding power? (How about for a thru bolt? How about
with a backing plate?)
Is epoxy the right material? With a filler?
I have two areas on my boat that might have the beginnings of delamination
problems: On the coachroof, there is an area about 1 sq ft, where there is
a crackling sound (fiberglass strands breaking?) when I walk on it. The
deflection does not seem to be excessive. If there's water in there, it must
have gotten in through grab rail screws. (The surveyor found no evidence of
moisture when I bought the boat 6 months ago.) Is it possible to have
delamination without moisture?
At the emergency tiller access in the cockpit floor, there is a 8" circular
cutout in the plywood core around the rudder post. There is some rot at
the forward end of this cutout, perhaps along a 2 inch section of the
perimeter. How can I guesstimate the distance that the moisture extends
into the plywood? I'd like to simply make a bigger cutout, and replace the
access hatch with a larger size. I'll seal the plywood edge with epoxy before
I put the new access hatch in.
--RS
|
1815.16 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Fri Dec 06 1991 12:48 | 40 |
| re .15:
Yes, making epoxy bushings is, I think, the right approach. On our boat,
and I suspect it is typical, the top (outer) layer of deck laminate is
thicker than the bottom (inner) layer. I have managed to get to the
underside of the deck for most of the hardware fastening holes. I use a
3/4" to 1" hole saw to cut out the inner laminate and balsa wood. This
leaves a 1/4" hole through the outer laminate. Using epoxy, I then glue
a small piece of fiberglass cloth over the hole from the underside. Once
the epoxy hardens, I fill the hole with slightly thickened epoxy from
above. Surprisingly often, quite a lot of epoxy is required as the epoxy
flows sideways into any delaminations between the balsa and deck
laminates and into any voids in the balsa core. When the epoxy hardens,
you have a solid, well-sealed epoxy bushing in the deck. Now if any
water leaks around the hardware mounting screw, the water won't get into
the deck, nor will will the deck be crushed from tightening the nuts
onto the screws. Be sure to use a backing plate or large fender washer
on the underside. If you absolutely cannot get to the underside of the
deck, cut the hole from the top. No prizes for guessing that this is a
tedious, time-consuming procedure. Also, be sure to fill the holes on a
cool day so that the epoxy doesn't cure too quickly. I use slow hardener
and even then I've a couple of times had to cut out the too-quickly
cured bushing and do the job over. In direct sunlight a deck gets very
warm even on a cool day.
I would never ever use screws to hold anything carrying any load (and
most especially stanchions, blocks, cleats, etc) to a fiberglass
laminate -- always through-bolt everything. I've had to cut a number of
holes in our deck liner to accomplish this. So far I done bushing for
all of the deck hardware (including handrails) except the genoa tracks.
Yes, it most certainly is possible to have delamination without
moisture. Balsa wood isn't terribly strong, and the laminate to balsa
bond does fail. Expansion of the deck on very hot days (especially if
the boat is air conditioned below) can even do it (or so I was told by
the manager of a reputable boatyard). Excessive flexing of an
insufficiently stiff structure will certainly do it.
Re your rotted plywood: I don't know of any way to estimate how far the
rot does. Keep cutting until you find the end of it.
|
1815.17 | Go for the Surgery | HYDRA::ALLA | | Wed Dec 11 1991 12:29 | 24 |
| Paul, go for the repair of the non-skid , you can get over to the
sides under the deck also.
Must have a core material. My 1967 Triton has the old basket
weave non-skid painted with poly and griptext. (use a brush,
as the boat yard did on mine, keeps the griptex from pulling
out of the paint when you roll)
Do it from the top. Allan is right on epoxy plugs, and for
heaven sakes DON'T use screws for hardware, an accident waiting
to happen ! (got to watch a runabout being pulled off the putty
once, when the cleat pulled out watch out ! 40% stretch in nylon
coming back with a metal piece on the end , no one got hurt)
I did see one deck removal, the Yard manager at a boat yard who
bought an old Chesepeak 32, bad deck, removed it all in ONE piece
flipped it over , cut off the inner liner and put new core and
liner back in. What a job !
The paint and griptex will hide any small flaws in the top glass
work, so I'd go for it, at least on the side decks. (I assume
you have some hardware mounted there, it's in doubt how it will hold
if it's that punky)
|
1815.18 | what about all the little holes? | MAST::SCHUMANN | | Thu Dec 12 1991 11:25 | 13 |
| > for heaven sakes DON'T use screws for hardware
lest my reputation should be ruined by the thought that I might be using mere
*screws* for deck hardware, I'd like to clarify that I was speaking of
non-critical stuff like dodger snaps. Unfortunately, there are more holes
in my deck from this sort of gear, than from *real* hardware :-(
The process described by Alan for through-bolts sounds excellent, but presumably
is overkill for the small screw holes. Any suggestions for dealing with these?
--RS
|
1815.19 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Thu Dec 12 1991 12:16 | 13 |
| re holes for small screws:
OK, yes, there are times that screws are an appropriate solution. I'd
suggest drilling a hole 3/8 to 1/2 inch in diameter or as large as
possible (ie, one that will be hidden by whatever you're attaching to
the deck) through the top layer of deck laminate and the core material.
Fill the hole with slightly thickened epoxy so that it is flush with top
surface of the deck. After the epoxy has hardened, drill a screw pilot
hole with a diameter equal to or slightly larger than the thread root
diameter of the screw.
Alan
|
1815.20 | Use RTV on small holes | HYDRA::ALLA | | Thu Dec 12 1991 15:32 | 7 |
| re: .18
On dodger screws I have used a dab of RTV on the end. Not as good
as the epoxy route but keeps the wet out.
I fill in all the old holes with epoxy and pigment, when no longer
needed. (since the boat is painted, deck and hull I now just touchup
with AwlGrip)
|