T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1801.1 | Win and loose? | GENIE::LUDIN | | Mon Oct 07 1991 11:49 | 8 |
| How much time do you need to set the mainsail again on the next boye?
And esspecially your light boat is rocking and rolling when you raise
it again?
Peter (sailing in Switzerland too, and hate these "Swiss light wind
conditions")
PL
|
1801.2 | | ELWOOD::KEENAN | | Tue Oct 08 1991 14:27 | 8 |
| I agree - the main does very little to drive the boat downwind in
very light air. But lowering anf then raising the main would bounce
the boat around too much to make it pay off.
Along the same lines: in light air I pull the boom to center line
early, I gybe, and then hold it there for awhile afterwards until
the boat settles down. I really helps to keep the chute full through
the gybe.
|
1801.3 | A sleigh ride... | ACTHUB::RYAN | | Wed Oct 09 1991 18:18 | 23 |
| A cautionary note: I once flew a chute on a downwind run without a
mainsail because the mainsail halyard was jammed. What started as
light wind became moderate with some significant gusts. What I learned
that day was that it is very difficult to *drop* the spinnaker in
moderate wind when you don't have anything to deflect the wind - no
matter how inconsequential the main may seem at driving the boat.
We must have run an additional 30-40 minutes trying to drop the chute
but the traditional methods just weren't working: every time we'd let
out the halyard and let out the pole, the chute would just climb a
little higher until it was significantly higher than the mast. What was
initially amusing became kind of scary as we were approaching the U.S
Lexington aircraft carrier in Pensacola, FL. Flying a spinnaker this
high gave me a new appreciation of the term "planing". This boat was
literally flying.
Eventually, part of the foot hit the water, dragged the CAL-24 to an
abrupt halt, and we got the wet chute in without any damage - except
that we went significantly out of our way. The Navy people also
jeered. Perhaps this is just bad seamanship due to inexperience (I was
17), but it was the ultimate sleigh ride... I leave my main up today.
Bob
|
1801.4 | | CHEST::BARKER | Now @NEW, ex. RYO,UCG,SBP,RES & REO | Thu Oct 10 1991 04:25 | 10 |
| I cannot belive that a fractional rig boat would perform better without
a main, in any conditions.
I have heard that masthead rigs can fly bloopers ( big-boys, big banana
shaped sails flown on the same side as, and outside, the main ) better in
light airs, with no main, but as they are very unusual these days, I
have never seen it done.
Chris
|
1801.5 | | BOOKS::BAILEYB | Let my inspiration flow ... | Thu Oct 10 1991 10:13 | 22 |
| RE .3
In a situation such as you describe the solution is to release the
spinnaker from the guy altogether as you are starting the takedown.
It cannot fly that way, as the chute is only connected at two points
(the sheet and halyard), and you can haul it in by the sheet as you
lower the halyard.
If you can't free the guy from the chute (pole's riding too high or you
are not using snap-shackles) just let the guy fly free. It's messier,
but it still works.
RE .4
We've used this tactic during races on both Wags (a fractional rig) and
Bodacious (a masthead). In either case you only do this when the air
is so light you are having trouble keeping your chute full. It's
marginally helpful, but if it means the difference between moving at .2
knots and stopping altogether then it's worth it.
... Bob
|
1801.6 | We drop it that way almost always | POBOX::DBERRY | | Thu Oct 10 1991 11:03 | 23 |
| I have found that releasing the guy is the preferred way to take down a
spinaker. We always did it that way racing. Granted, we were nearly
always taking it down when we were rounding a mark, but we found it the
fastest and most effective in nearly every condition. The key to
making this work fast is to have someone standing in the companionway
with one hand on the spinaker sheet ready to start hauling in. As soon
as the guy is released( and I mean really let it fly), you also want to
drop the halyard a few feat to give more slack to the person hauling in
the spinaker. You then have that person simply pull it right down into
the cabin. You will, as soon as the person in the companionway has
taken in all the slack they can, have to then lower the halyard the
rest of the way while they pull it in.
Another way we used a lot less often was when we had the shoot up but
had to gain some distance to windward (like clearing a mark on some
point of land). Then you can (with the jib up) pull the sheat in tight
while releasing the guy. If you get the spinaker behind the jib and
pulled up tight against it, a vaccum will form sucking the spinaker
against the back side of the jib. You can then pull it down under the
jib. It will simply slide down adhering to the jib. Then when you are
to the point where you can fall of again, you can actually raise it
back the same way(everything is still rigged the right way.
|
1801.7 | Chutes, Bloopers and Mains | RECYCL::MCBRIDE | | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:58 | 15 |
| We also never have dropped the main while the chute is up. We have
sheeted the main in tighter to decrease any shadowing effect of the
main on the spinnaker. I have seen this done on two boats I raced on.
To digress slightly, flying a blooper is fun but can only be done with
the wind on the quarter or aft and only under 10-12 knots. We gain a
significant advantage downwind this way since few boats have them
aboard on Champlain, almost no one in our fleet. Funny thing is that
we apparently are not penalized for the additional and significant
amount of extra sail area. On a 30 mile downwind leg, this can amount
to a lot of ground made up. They do take two people to fly effectively
as the sheet and halyard must be played to maintain trim. Even with a
blooper, we still do not drop the main.
Brian
|
1801.8 | Keep It up, Sailor | TUNER::HO | | Fri Oct 11 1991 10:02 | 43 |
| Light air and running don't mix. In a desperation drifter, it's almost
impossible. The boat's own motion will swing the apparent wind forward and
plaster the chute against the forestay and spreaders. If there's any wave
motion at all, the whipping of the mast will knock all the air out of the
chute.
While it may be possible to enhance the flyability of the chute by dousing
the main, it'll still be working in its most inefficient mode and the area
of the main won't be working at all. The better choice is to head up to
get what little wind there is coming over the beam. That way, neither sail
blankets the other and they both work with the wind flow in attached mode.
Knowing where the wind is when it's light isn't easy. Magtape telltales
are a must. If there's any wave motion, both the telltales and windex will
occillate all over the place. One must interpolate between the extremes of
the oscillations to find the mean wind direction and maneuver the boat
carefully to get that direction over the beam.
Wind won't follow a deep curve in light air so it's necessary to pull the
outhaul tight on the main. Believe it or not it'll work better. Put the
pole right on the forestay and have the trimmer hang off the leeward shroud
with the chute clew in his hand so the chute won't have to support the
weight of the sheet. If that's not enough, gather some of the material
near the clew in your hand to make the chute smaller and flatter.
It'll be necessary to jibe downwind and this is harder to do in a super
drifter than in a gale. Once the boat bears off, the apparent wind will
exceed the true wind and the chute will collapse. The foredeck person has
to gather the chute and walk it around the front of forestay. Then the
trimmer will have to whip the pole back and forth a few times to fan some
air into it.
If the chute won't stay up even on a beam reach, drop it. Set a small jib
and hold it out to catch the wind as indicated by the shroud telltale.
Believe whatever the telltale says. You can't feel the wind when it's that
light. Keep the main boom way out and lined up with the shroud telltales so
whatever wind there is stays attached.
In a region where light air is endemic, a .5 ounce flat chute or a light
staysail can be useful, albeit exquisitely expensive and distressingly
prone to catastrophic destruction if the wind picks up.
- gene
|
1801.9 | more free advice at half price | AKOCOA::DJOHNSTON | | Fri Oct 11 1991 11:07 | 19 |
| Re: -.1
Agree with a few exceptions in larger boat circumstances.
First, go to light spin sheets and take off the lazy guy. Using your
Daisy Staysail as a drifter when the chute won't fill is a good idea.
Second, jibing in light air. The idea is to keep the chute full and
spin the boat underneath it. the trimmer controls both sheets. the
helmsman violently turns the boat so it makes little movement forward,
but changes direction. Done properly, the chute will not "know" that
the boat has changed direction. The trimmer must move sheets quickly
to erase the movement of the boat to the chute.
Third, if you live in an area of consistent light air, I don't
recommend spending money on a light air chute. Spend a little more
money and MOVE!!! ;^)
Dave
|
1801.10 | Bloopers are Practical Jokes | MILKWY::WAGNER | Scott | Fri Oct 11 1991 12:32 | 11 |
|
I don't think PHRF allows bloopers. Forget the wording, something
like if there's not a luff connected, ther'd better be a pole on
it... and no poles allowed on the same side as the boom.
As in Dave's reply, staysails are the toy of choice for broad
reaching under chute. They're pretty easy to trim, once the
deck hardware's debugged. Now if I can fit it in the budget...
Capt. Clewless
|
1801.11 | | CRATE::BARKER | Now @NEW, ex. RYO,UCG,SBP,RES & REO | Mon Oct 14 1991 05:26 | 10 |
| > I don't think PHRF allows bloopers.
IMS doesn't either.
Personally, I think they are rather silly,and difficult to use
effectively, but the psychological advantage of a masthead kite plus
blooper over a fractional rig is considerable !
Chris
|