T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1764.1 | money for nothing ... | BOOKS::BAILEYB | Let my inspiration flow ... | Wed Jul 24 1991 16:43 | 17 |
| Ah yes, this topic has been in numerous publications. It's discussed
in several of the reports I get from BOAT/US every month.
The sad part is, they're calling it a "user fee", but you don't get
anything for your money ... except that nice warm feeling that comes
from giving the government more of your hard-earned dollars. The money
does not go to the Coast Guard, or anything else that has to do
specifically with boating.
There's a lobby fighting for repeal of this fee, but they don't seem to
be making much headway.
I'll dig up some of my BOAT/US reports (if I've saved them anyway) and
post some more details.
... Bob
|
1764.2 | budget games -- we all lose | SELECT::SPENCER | | Thu Jul 25 1991 11:47 | 10 |
| >>> There's a lobby fighting for repeal of this fee, but they don't seem to
>>> be making much headway.
It's been determined by several groups, including at least one GAO office,
that administration and enformcement of this law will cost substantially
more than the maximum anticipated revenue.
To quote Yakov Smirnoff: "What a country!"
J.
|
1764.3 | I knew I shouldn'ta cleaned up the place ... | BOOKS::BAILEYB | Let my inspiration flow ... | Thu Jul 25 1991 13:54 | 17 |
| Well, I couldn't find my BOAT/US reports last night. Which means
either I threw them out or I put them somewhere where I wouldn't lose
them ... ;^)
As to the cost of administration/enforcement vs antipicated revenue, I
think that'll simply give them justification to raise the rates higher
and higher each year until people start giving up boating as a
recreation.
Does anyone else in here belong to BOAT/US. Those reports contained
some good information about which congressmen support/drive this bill
and which ones oppose it. There was a BOAT/US membership write-in
campaign, and one of those reports told you which senators to write to
express your views on this so-called "user fee".
... Bob
|
1764.4 | Two shots fired; both feet hit | SELECT::SPENCER | | Thu Jul 25 1991 15:08 | 18 |
| Bob,
>>> As to the cost of administration/enforcement vs antipicated revenue, I
>>> think that'll simply give them justification to raise the rates higher
>>> and higher each year until people start giving up boating as a
>>> recreation.
The industry is trying to gather evidence that the new luxury tax is
impacting sales to the point that total revenue is below pre-L.T. levels,
and that the cost of unemployment insurance and other benefits for
laid-off workers exceeds the luxury tax income. I've read somewhere that
this is generally acknowledged in the industry and by industry analysts;
the problem is organizing proof of it.
User fee? *BANG!* Got that foot good!
Luxury tax? *BANG!* There...Got the other one, too!
J.
|
1764.5 | Post no Bills | GRANMA::HAJOHNSON | | Mon Jul 29 1991 09:20 | 3 |
| Just what I need...***ANOTHER*** mandatory sticker.
|
1764.6 | Lighting a potential powder keg.... | AKO539::KALINOWSKI | | Mon Jul 29 1991 14:19 | 38 |
|
Bob
I belong to Boat US. They say they have the bill killed because of
the backlash. There is a second bill being introduced to kill the first
one. We'll see.
The problem I have is the actual backlash Boat US has been mounting.
People carping over a fee that equates to a round of wine coolers at
the club. I agree they should call it a tax and be done with it. The
thing that really gets me irked is that people yelling the loudest seem
to be the folks who own 40-60 foot toys, not dingy sailors or bass boat
anglers. These are the same people who get a 4,000 dollar rebate on
interest from their boat payments cause they are called second homes.
No other country has such a loophole.
These are the same people who say the luxury tax causes people not
to buy new boats. I believe people are out of work, but it is the
uncertain economy and not the tax that is causing it.
I read my Boat US catalog and see stupid acrylic wine goblets with
my monograms engraved on it for the the cost of this "fee" (ie tax).
I also see a lot of bad on the other side of that yacht club parking
lot. People scratching for a living. As I get older I find myself more
and more humble to have the good lord spare me the predictament many of
these folks have.
Balance the budget and everyone wins. Make Congress call it a tax
instead of a fee and maybe Congress will not think we are as stupid
as we seem (ie see how much money Terminator 2 is grossing???). Isolate
the cretan who snuck the fee into the budget discussions after it had
been to committee as a sleeze ball . I just like to see the money spent
wisely for once instead of it going to the general grab bag.
time to cast off...
john
|
1764.7 | sailing=sailing, soapbox=politics | 38723::COUTURE | Abandon shore | Tue Jul 30 1991 09:53 | 2 |
| Can we possibly limit the comments to sailing, not what people's
opinions are of what constitutes an equitable redistribution of wealth?
|
1764.8 | Who has paid it ? | BOMBE::ALLA | | Mon Aug 12 1991 12:06 | 8 |
| Has anyone in the Notes conf paid the tax yet ? I'm debating if
it's worth it as my boat comes out early each year.
It looks like the tax/fee is on the block to be repealed when the
congress comes back in Sept, however I wonder if we would ever see
a rebate once the dollars are paid.
Frank
|
1764.9 | Rats. It passed. | MILKWY::WAGNER | Scott | Mon Aug 12 1991 12:55 | 13 |
|
Was dismayed to read about the passage in the BOAT-US rag. I think
it said something like the coasties wouldn't begin hassling people `til
September?
It is silly that it goes to some sort of `general fund'. I sure
would like to see some of the gov't receipts.
On second thought, my blood pressure's high enough already...
What sort of `Tea Party' could be staged?
Scott_Scofflaw
|
1764.10 | FEE or FREE | GRANMA::HAJOHNSON | | Tue Aug 13 1991 08:36 | 9 |
| I called the 800 number, gave them my credit card and last Saturday
received my green decal "C". $50.00 seemed a better alternative than
the fine should they enforce it.
Sunday I had a message from the decal office on my voicemail saying
they must have gotten my credit card number wrong and cannot process
it. Gee, should I call them back or not...?
Hank
|
1764.11 | You have your decal, and... | MSCSSE::FRENCH | Bill French ZKO3-3/X8 381-1859 | Tue Aug 13 1991 08:50 | 5 |
| Maybe the callback is a scam from someone else to get your credit card
number.
b
|
1764.12 | About that $100
About that $100
| MR4DEC::BPARKER | | Wed Aug 14 1991 12:28 | 3 |
| I asked about getting my $'s back if the las was repealled and was told that the
repeal would not take affect until 1992, if passed, and the decal was for 1991 so they keep the
the bucks
|
1764.13 | | ICS::R_GREEN | Ron Green 223-8956 | Wed Aug 14 1991 13:28 | 10 |
| re: .11
maybe the _law_ is a scam to get your credit card # :-)
are the coasties charged with enforcement on the high seas, in harbors
and along coastal waters? or does some other law enforcemnt body have
jurisdiction ?? can you imagine the impact of a revenue cutter in the
Annisquam??
|
1764.14 | Maybe we should drysail a bit earlier this year | AKO539::KALINOWSKI | | Thu Aug 15 1991 09:14 | 9 |
| re .13
Sail magazine said the coast guard would be doing the dirty work.
Now till Aug 30th, they will give you a phamlet saying you need a
sticker. After that you have 30 days to prove you had paid the fee, or
they can fine you up to $5000.
john
|
1764.15 | Documented boats and the fee | BOMBE::ALLA | | Thu Aug 15 1991 10:06 | 8 |
| One thought on paying the fee. I have a documented boat, which means
dealing with the USCG on renewal every year.
They just might compare files on paid up fees and documentation
renewals.
Sounds like it's going to have to be paid in any case. :o(
|
1764.16 | Just hand over your wallet Buddy! | MILKWY::WAGNER | Scott | Thu Aug 15 1991 12:34 | 14 |
|
Just redocumented- no mention of the fee. But it may not yet be
really gelled....
Anyway I see a <50% hit ratio this year, more next year, etc.
Fee will probably increase too, right?
Also, licencing is spreading- no argument with the theory, just the
yearly fee they add, and the p*ss-poor training I've heard that states
use as a `driver's ed'.
Whoops sorry that's another topic. Now where's my wallet?
Voice_o'_doom
|
1764.17 | Quick Eddie, Sheet her in, it's the cops!! | AKO539::KALINOWSKI | | Thu Aug 15 1991 13:32 | 14 |
|
With all this confusion and only a couple of weeks left to the
season, sure looks like a great business opportunity to crank out
a couple thousand "grey market" decals ;>) ;>)
On a more serious note, how long will it be till some poor daysailor
who gets out 1-2 times a year and doesn't read the sail magazines gets
nailed while on vacation labor day weekend by the sticker nazis ??
a 5K fine sure would wipe the smile off of my face real quick no
matter how hard the wind was blowing...
john
|
1764.18 | Can I put it down yet????? | AKO539::KALINOWSKI | | Fri Aug 30 1991 11:24 | 17 |
| I ordered my sticker last friday. It showed up Wednesday.
At least they are quick about it.
On the end of the sticker is an extra section with the serial number that
says "hold on to this for your records". I guess it's for my future
rebate ;>)
If this is a fee, maybe they could use the serial numbers for a drawing
like Publisher's clearing house. Winner gets their choice of any of the
boats confiscated from drug arrests. You know, the ones you can buy of
a penny on the dollar!! Doesn't cost the government anything, and
people will be flocking to get in on the lottery!!!
many ;>)
john
|
1764.19 | Protest | GRANMA::HAJOHNSON | | Wed Sep 11 1991 09:12 | 8 |
| The Boat US newsletter indicates that they have file a suit
against the user fee. Their arguments sound good and of course
they have established a fund to which you may help with the legal fees.
I have not yet attached my sticker, but if I must, it will
"accidentally" be displayed upsidedown...small gesture of protest.
|
1764.20 | | CHRCHL::GERMAIN | | Wed Sep 11 1991 09:42 | 5 |
| I noiticed the Coasties out both last weekend and the weekend before.
And I hadn't seen them since the beginning of the season. Any word on
whether they are stopping people and checking?
Gregg
|
1764.21 | Ignore it and it will go away | SELECT::COUTURE | Abandon shore | Wed Sep 11 1991 10:27 | 4 |
| The Coasties would be very busy. I read an article in the Middlesex
News last weekend that said 95% of the boating public was ignoring
the sticker requirements. Looks like I'm in the majority for once!
|
1764.22 | fear? | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Sep 11 1991 10:48 | 7 |
| Well, we paid the tax and have the stickers properly applied. It seems
fiancially less risky than not doing do. All the Coast Guard needs to do
is use the IRS tax compliance strategy -- fear. If the CG whacks a few
owners with big fines and makes sure that there is lots of publicity,
the 95% ignoring the law will quickly decide to comply, especially since
it is so easy to determine who has/hasn't paid. How many automobiles to
you see on the roads without valid inspection decals?
|
1764.23 | Still holding out | MEMORY::PARE | | Thu Sep 12 1991 17:16 | 8 |
| I never heard of a person getting slapped with a $5000 fine for not
having a current auto inspection sticker. People also realize the
importance of having safe vehicles on the road. I don't know anyone who
feels that there is any logical reason for this "fee".
Now if you want to call it a tax.......
John (who is still protesting by not complying)
|
1764.24 | Sticker Patrol on Narragansett Bay | CAPNET::RONDINA | | Thu Sep 12 1991 17:40 | 7 |
| I was out on Narragansett Bay last Saturday, Sept 7, and noticed the CG
darting hither and yon all day in a small, but fast launch, stopping
boats. I thought that they might be checking for overboard dumping,
but guess that it was for the sticker. Since I sail through a sailing
club, I was not too worried, and the boat had the sticker.
Paul
|
1764.25 | Ever! | AKOCOA::DJOHNSTON | | Thu Sep 12 1991 18:46 | 3 |
| NEVER.
Dave
|
1764.26 | The CG has better things to do | SELECT::COUTURE | Abandon shore | Fri Sep 13 1991 09:40 | 6 |
| re. 24
Yeah, I'm sure the CG was checking for stickers. With the same vigor
they check for proper holding tanks.
|
1764.27 | Your tax dollars at work..... | SAURUS::CASAZZA | | Fri Sep 13 1991 14:30 | 5 |
| It sure helps me sleep better at night knowing that our
government is out there protecting me from all those
non-fee payers........
Joe
|
1764.28 | Cost-Effective Government? | TOOK::MCINNES | | Fri Sep 13 1991 15:21 | 1 |
| We should be happy that we don't get all the government we pay for.
|
1764.29 | Raise Hell with the reps ! | BOMBE::ALLA | | Mon Sep 23 1991 17:57 | 21 |
| YUp, I got mine. Don't need the hassle when I'm on the water.
But I did write letters to Sen Hollings and Kerry . The best we
can do is support the Boat Us suit and keep the pressure on
our congress and senate to dump this turkey.
I find you get answers to your letter when you do them in longhand !
The form letters to the reps tend to get talleyed, signed letters
do better and old fashioned ones seem to make it up the chain.
(ah junk Mail !)
We have to raise hell on this issue, or we will get fee'd to death.
Its happening all over the US of A, "fee" or even targeted taxes(ie;
gas tax, airline, **) which magically end up in the twilight zone of
the general fund.
Just remember the promises make over Marine Chart prices a few years
back !!
:((
|
1764.30 | Their Back ..... | AKO539::KALINOWSKI | | Mon Mar 23 1992 12:12 | 7 |
|
Along with all my new spring catalogs, I got a renewal notice from
uncle sam for my NEW sticker. Time to open the old wallet. Too bad I
cann't just check off a box on my income tax to subtract the TAX and
automatically send me my sticker along with my refund!
john
|
1764.31 | Don't give Gov. ideas | SALEM::GILMAN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 09:23 | 4 |
| I suggest you not give "them" (the Gov.) any ideas about automatic
subtractions from my account(s).
Jeff
|