T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1721.1 | Try before You Buy | TUNER::HO | | Tue May 21 1991 14:03 | 10 |
| The used sail brokers often let prospective customers try out the sails
they're interested in before paying for them.
Even a hopelessly blown out chute will suffice if it's primary use is
running and broad reaching. It doesn't even have to be made specifically
for a catalina 22. Lots of old Rhodes 19, J24, Soling, Etchells chutes
around that might do. In fact, if you're in the EMASS area, I have an
old chute that might be a good candidate.
- gene
|
1721.2 | Bacon | MR4DEC::BPARKER | | Tue May 21 1991 15:29 | 4 |
| Bacon Associates in Annapolis (?) MD is one of the biggest. They have a
list of the current offerings and a ahonest description of the sails
condition. I have both bought and sold through them and was very
satisfied. They have a ad in th back of most sailing mags.
|
1721.3 | Bacon's Telephone number | MAMTS3::JWAITE | Johnson Waite 424-2176 | Tue May 21 1991 15:34 | 8 |
| re .2
Bacon's number is 301-263-4880. They will mail you the listings if you
give them sail sizes.
Johnse
|
1721.4 | Poleless spinnnakers? | ACTHUB::RYAN | | Wed May 29 1991 20:15 | 19 |
| I called and received some information from Bacon and Associates
regarding used spinnakers. Looking through the listings, I saw a large
number of "poleless spinnakers". In the past, my knowledge of
asymetrical spinnakers were that they were oddly shaped sails somewhere
in between a genoa and regular spinnaker. Now I see listings for a
variety of shapes: cross-cut, radial head, and even a star-cut.
I'll confess my ignorance here: my indirect knowledge of asymetrical
spinnakers was that they were betwixt and between the benefits and
hassles of going wing-on-wing and flying a normal spinnaker. I thought
that they had lousy sail shape and were even more of a hassle to jibe.
Obviously, things have changed - but how much? Does anyone have
experience with these things and if so, what sail shape/cut?
I assumed that I would add a pole, uphauls, etc. but I found out this
gear will cost about $350 which is more than I thought...
Bob
|
1721.5 | Do it right | AKOCOA::DJOHNSTON | | Thu May 30 1991 10:09 | 13 |
| Keep in mind that with cruising pole-less chutes the tack never goes to
windward of the forestay, limiting its down wind usage. I can't
believe a track, topping lift and foreguy with a pole would cost $350
for a C 22!
If you live around Boston, check out the Marine Exchange in Danvers for
used poles, etc. You don't need Harken track. In fact, for a C 22
interesting in cruising only, a fixed padeye on the mast would do fine.
Get a real chute. Ever wonder why there were so many cruising chutes
available?
Dave
|
1721.6 | Cost of Spinnaker Gear | TUNER::HO | | Fri May 31 1991 13:33 | 51 |
|
spinnaker parts list
------------------------
part descrp units # unit $ tot $
------------- ----- ---- ------ -----
pole section feet 13 $4.50 $58.50
end fittings pair 1 $70.00 $70.00
bridle wire feet 30 $1.00 $30.00
nicropress 4 $0.10 $0.40
ss rings 2 $1.00 $2.00
toping lift block 1 $10.00 $10.00
topping lift tang 1 $2.00 $2.00
topping lift cleet 1 $3.00 $3.00
topping lift line feet 25 $0.50 $12.50
foreguy block 1 $10.00 $10.00
foreguy padeye 1 $5.00 $5.00
foreguy line feet 25 $0.50 $12.50
foreguy cleet 1 $3.00 $3.00
foreguy fairleads 2 $3.00 $6.00
turning blocks 2 $12.00 $24.00
sheets feet 88 $0.50 $44.00
screws/rivets 20 $0.10 $2.00
snap shackles 3 $20.00 $60.00
snatch blocks 2 $35.00 $70.00
halyard cleet 1 $3.00 $3.00
halyard feet 60 $0.50 $30.00
halyard block 1 $10.00 $10.00
halyard tang 1 $2.00 $2.00
--------
$469.90
And when all the above are in place, you still need to buy the chute
itself.
- gene
|
1721.7 | More parts | TUNER::HO | | Fri May 31 1991 13:41 | 4 |
| And another thing - you need that ring on the mast to which the pole
attaches. Another $10 please.
- gene
|
1721.8 | Point made, Gene | AKOCOA::DJOHNSTON | | Fri May 31 1991 13:54 | 5 |
| Sure, if you bought that stuff new. Marine exchange has poles lying
around that I'm sure would cost a lot less. Still, as a percent of
your boat's total cost, it's not a lot for the added enjoyment.
Dave
|
1721.9 | Pole thickness? | ACTHUB::RYAN | | Mon Jun 03 1991 14:23 | 24 |
| I called Marine Exchange the other day and asked about used poles; they
claimed that they didn't have any, usually don't have them, and would I
like to buy new for around $200 (pole only).
Since this is really a baby boat, I was surprised by the cost. I want
to buy good - not great - gear since I don't see keeping this boat all
that long. The Catalina has an extra halyard and a pad eye on the
mast. I'm reasoning that I need the following:
- topping lift blocks, halyard, etc.
- pole with end fittings, topping lift bridle, bridle for guy
- padeye for guy, etc
Looking at West Marine's catalog, they seem to have two categories of
Forespare poles: one for serious racers/larger boats, and one for
"small boats" (up to 7'2"). My concern here is that the small boat
pole is of only 1.25" tubing ($42). The 2" tubing plus the end
fittings and bridles runs about $120. Is 2" tubing satifactory for a
spinnaker with a 25' leach and 14.5' foot?
Thanks,
Bob
|
1721.10 | Turning blocks | ACTHUB::RYAN | | Mon Jun 03 1991 14:24 | 4 |
| In reference to .9, I forgot to add that I need two turning blocks and
sheets. Any suggestions for manufactures of turning blocks?
Bob
|
1721.11 | ex | AKO539::KALINOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1991 14:40 | 7 |
| re .10
I use harken 2" blocks on my catamaran spinnaker. I make sure the load
strength of the blocks is greater than the sheets.
john
|
1721.12 | A penny saved is a penny you can spend on beer | AKOCOA::DJOHNSTON | | Mon Jun 03 1991 16:00 | 36 |
| You can save a little by not doing bridles for the topping lift and
foreguy. Just attach to the end of the pole. The fittings at the end
of the pole will accomodate a shackle for each. Ofcourse then you are
committed to dip pole jibing and will need a track on the mast for the
car to slide up and down on. Hmmm. maybe the bridle is cheaper.
A two inch pole will be more than strong enough.
I'm sorry about the bum steer to Marine Exchange. I could swear they
had poles stacked up in the garage/receiving area last time I was there
and they did not look new!
Another way to save a few bucks is to use your jib halyard as a topping
lift. You aren't racing, so just drop the jib before raising the
chute.
As for a foreguy, a block on the foredeck probably isn't absolutely
necessary. Just a fairlead eye. We aren't talking huge frictional
loads. My assumption is that you'll only have the chute up in fair
weather. No reason to have it up when too windy if you aren't racing.
So you can do without the extra load factors a racing setup has to
have.
As for turning blocks, I'd use snatch blocks and put on padeyes. You
can always use the snatch blocks to do other things when not using the
spinnaker. When you move up to another boat they can go with you.
Good investment. Can't have too many of those puppies!
No reason at all to get all the racing goodies. Harken blocks are
great, but outrageously expensive. Merriman makes good snatch blocks
that are available through discounters. They should be more than
strong enough.
This CAN be done cheap!
Dave
|
1721.13 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Jun 03 1991 18:03 | 7 |
| For a used pole you might try Marine Speculator, now in Danvers.
re.12:
Finding Merriman hardware may be difficult, since Merriman is no longer
in business. Sigh.
|
1721.14 | poor boy's chute | TUNER::HO | | Mon Jun 03 1991 18:27 | 31 |
| There is a lot to be said for Dave's low budget approach (though it
must be a unfamiliar concept to him).
I've had some success flying chutes from sailing club boats not
equipped for it by doing the following:
Use the jib halyard as the chute halyard. Just remember to take the
chute down on the same side you launched it from to avoid twisting the
halyard on the forestay.
For the topping lift, jam a sail tie between a sail slide and the mast
so it's about halfway to the spreaders when the main's up and tie it
into a loop. Pass some spare line through this and tie to the middle
of the pole to hold it up.
For the foreguy, tie a piece of line around the base of the mast
leading to the middle of the pole. Adjust both topping lift and
foreguy to suit the wind.
Don't bother with turning blocks. Use the jib cars. Put the one on
the pole side forward near the shrouds and the other one all the way
back.
Another sail tie around the mast held the inboard end of the pole.
This used to look strange and the owner of the club frowned on it.
Especially given the mismatch in size between the soling chutes and the
Pearson 26s we were using them on. But it speeded up the boat on those
downwind stretches when the working jibs just didn't have enough area.
- gene
|
1721.15 | More questions on economizing | ACTHUB::RYAN | | Mon Jun 03 1991 20:32 | 29 |
| I like the suggestions about cutting down on the cost of rigging. A
question about .14: if you used the genoa track's blocks instead of
turning blocks, you'd have the correct angle to the winches all set.
It seems to me that the sheet controlling the pole would be ok as well.
But, wouldn't the spinnaker sheet angle be pretty tight (even if I set
the block as though it were for a 170 genny)?
Regarding .13: This boat's spinnaker halyard is really the boat's jib
halyard that is not in use owing to rolling furling on the genny. I
think that adding a topping lift is a good idea/investment. But, I
have a question here: the boat has internal halyards leading to two
double sheave organizers, then the halyards lead to the cockpit.
Should the topping lift also be internal, and if so, is it possible to
substitute the single mast foot exit block with a double mast foot exit
block (not sure if this is the correct terminology) to accomodate the
sheet for the topping lift (or is this a halyard)?
I'd like to use the mast foot to control the foreguy and run the sheet
to the other double sheeve organizer. I don't thing a padeye on the
deck for the foreguy is absolutely necessary.
Final question: how hard is doing your own mast and deck rigging? I've
seen some butchered boats with either (a) padeyes/blocks in the wrong
location and subsequently moved, (b) poorly caulked leaking fittings,
and (c) general amateurish look.
Thanks,
Bob
|
1721.16 | Be wary of shipping charges | SELECT::COUTURE | Abandon shore | Tue Jun 04 1991 09:47 | 4 |
| You may not save anything buying a whisker pole from a mail order
discounter. Depending upon how long the pole is, it may be too long
to be shipped via UPS and will have to come via truck. That expense
will be a very expensive surprise, far more than any discount.
|
1721.17 | Oh, a roller furling genny... | AKOCOA::DJOHNSTON | | Tue Jun 04 1991 09:51 | 27 |
| Wow, no more Merriman? Didn't know that. Who makes those wonderful,
rubber sided snatch blocks nowadays?
Gene, we are the KINGS of low budget approaches! It's all relative.
Now, as for the topping lift, I hadn't considered that you'd have a
roller furling genny that stays up. Then you do need a topper. If you
want to lead it internally, fine. No need to, though. Remember that
it doesn't go to the top of the mast. If you want to lead it
internally you will need a Harken #086 (088?) through block at the mast
where it comes out on top and at the bottom where it comes out. I
wouldn't go with a double exit block.
The above mentioned Harkens are very inexpensive. I just replaced the
metal sheave version of this block for my topping lift.
Using genny blocks for turning blocks will not be optimal, but better
than nothing and not too bad for downwind work. Reaching will be a bit
choked at the leach.
Finally, don't be afraid to install deck hardware. Try to match what
you have so new stuff doesn't stick out too much. Poor caulking jobs
are reflective of the time and patience the owner spent installing the
gear. Proper planning will result in a much more fun boat to sail.
Don't forget the backing plates!
Dave
|
1721.18 | could of ideas | AKO539::KALINOWSKI | | Tue Jun 04 1991 13:13 | 32 |
|
I would opt for an external set-up. A lot less to go wrong, and
in an fix, you can easily cut the halyard to drop the head .
I run my halyard down the side to a harken ckeak block. this
then goes up to a head-knocker on the mast, but it easily could be
routed to the back. It is always nice to be able to help lower the
head while the crew is gathering the chute.
One thing to remember is that if you use a cam cleat device for the
head, make sure the jaws are alum. I burned through a set of Plastic
harkens the first windy day.
If you have a separate halyard, it makes dousing the chute easier,
since you can put out the genny or jib to take some of the power out
of the spinnaker. Sure makes putting it away easier for a crusing boat.
For mounting hardware, it pays to look around at other boats that have
similar shaped decks or masts. Many times the builders design trick
mounts that would fit in a pinch on your boat, and that give that
professional look. As for leaky masts, use those rivit caps in the
hole before poping the hardware in place. And finish up with a good
silicone sealant.
john
One rule I have is to try to make sure any sheaves that are
permanently mounted to the mast are of the roller bearing design. Maybe
it's me, but if I rivit a sheave with just a stanless Steel shaft in
the middle, I get enough corrosion to freeze the sheave before I can
say "Ahhhh NO, not again!". Must be from living a bad life. ;>)
|
1721.19 | Bacon Associated by have gone under | MCS873::KALINOWSKI | | Fri Jun 03 1994 14:34 | 11 |
| re .2
I called Bacon associates early last week. They said they would
send me a price list. When I called back today to see if they mailed
it, I was told the phone was disconnected.
A call to another broker said several people had call them with the
same question. Time will tell....
john
|
1721.20 | I haven't seen any Bacon ads lately either | UNIFIX::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Tue Jun 07 1994 15:20 | 5 |
| I had noticed that Bacon's ad was not in some of the magazines that
I looked for it in the last few months.
Bill
|