T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1146.1 | | AYOU17::NAYLOR | Drive a Jaguar, fly a Cheetah | Mon Mar 13 1989 05:45 | 20 |
| I can't speak fro the Pettit paint, but I used Micron CSC last year
and apart from a little slime and a couple of points where weed
had attached (paint chipped away by hitting "things"?) there was
no foul growth at all.
As to the merits of quantities of copper? It's a poison the same
as tin, and no doubt one day some-one will prove that copper being
leeched out of small craft antifouling is causing just as much damage
as TBT ever did. Of course, the big boys are still using tin ....
I suppose I'm lucky in one way that my boat is small (less poison
to leech) and I can haul it easily (break-back trailer etc.) so
I'm actually thinking of NOT putting antifouling on the boat this
year at all. Yes, there's still some old layers left, but their
usefulness is probably nil except that the bottom will scrape clean
easily. My contribution to a cleaner environment? Possibly, and
every little helps.
Brian
|
1146.2 | Alum. Dinghy - Diff. paint? | HAZEL::YELINEK | WITHIN 10 | Wed Mar 22 1989 13:13 | 16 |
| Haven't given bottom paint much thought. All I know is it prevents
growth on the hull and you should(must) use bottom paint if you're
boat will be in the salt water all the time. My hull will be bottom
painted by the dealer as part of the contract. I'll need to think
more about re-coating next season.
My question concerns the use of bottom paint on an aluminum boat
which I'll be using as my dinghy. Isn't the paint for Alum. the
stuff that was banned recently...and you really shouldn't use this
type of paint UNLESS you are using it on alum..? I hear that this
type of paint (the stuff that was banned for use or unavailable)
is/was the most affective as compared to what is now generally
available. Can someone shed a little light on this.?
/MArk
|
1146.3 | Time to Cover the KL990 | YACHTS::CORKUM | I'd rather be sailing.... | Fri May 12 1989 16:56 | 13 |
|
I've got to decide on what bottom paint to use this year. I have been
using KL-990 in the past but I don't have enough left for this year.
I've sanded the bottom (not bare) and need a paint that will cover/adhere
to what is left. As you may know, KL-990 is a "soft" paint and I have heard
that not all others will work with it.
Suggestions please.
bc
|
1146.4 | I tried Boat U.S. | NSSG::BUDZINSKI | Just when you least expect it... The unexpected! | Wed May 17 1989 18:00 | 10 |
|
I am in the same situation. I just put on the "cheap" Boat U.S. soft
copper alcoyd(sp) based bottom paint. I've been in the water about 4
weeks now and none of it has floated off yet. We'll see how it looks
later in the season.
Regards,
|
1146.5 | ex | RECYCL::MCBRIDE | | Tue Apr 24 1990 09:24 | 9 |
| Can someone recommend a good or proper bottom prep method prior to
adding anit fouling? Last year wwe took all of the old paint off which
was considerable and started fresh. Most of it sprayed off with the
power wash when hauled. We are repeating the process but do not wish
to do this yearly. I do not think we prepped very well ie using a
solvent or roughing up enough. Any tips? We used Horizons 2 and
probably will again.
Brian
|
1146.6 | Horizons 2 is the culprit | AITG::COUTURE | Abandon shore | Tue Apr 24 1990 09:53 | 14 |
| My best recommendation would be NOT to use Horizons 2. I used it last
season and it was just AWFUL. It went on more like honey than paint
and I couldn't get it smooth at all. I wrote to PETIT and talked to
their regional sales manager. Petit is replacing the bottom paint free
to anyone who used Horizons and called up an complained. They'll give
you any other paint in their line as a replacement. The salesman said
that they were trying to come up with some other ablative formula, but
for now they were stuck with Horizons 2.
As far as the paint wearing off, it shouldn't really be hit with the
power wash, although most marinas do it as a matter of course. The
directions call for washing it down at the end of the season with
a garden hose since the ablative nature of the paint readily concedes
to high pressure water.
|
1146.7 | Agree | AKOV12::DJOHNSTON | | Tue Apr 24 1990 10:11 | 7 |
| Since you are taking it down to the raw bottom, I would agree that now
is the time to go to a harder finish. Our botton paint lasts two years
at least with scrubs only necessary for racing smoothness. A power
wash should not trash your bottom and you would then only have to sand
lightly before adding another coat the next year.
Dave
|
1146.8 | Recommendations if we switch? | RECYCL::MCBRIDE | | Tue Apr 24 1990 11:17 | 13 |
| Any suggestions on a harder bottom paint? We have a gallon of Horizons
2 left over which may be worth while trying to sell back to Petit
(exchange). Any recommendation on any of the others in the Petit line?
Our needs are skewed towards cruising and we will do not usually scrub
the bottom during the season so maximum growth retardation is desireable.
Also, are there preparation tips to follow or just read the label? By
the way, the Horizons 2 came from a very strong recommendation from
another person in the yard last Spring. They were very happy with it
and the bottom looked great. Seeing was believing at the time.
Thanks for the replies.
Brian
|
1146.9 | Do Nothing | STEREO::HO | | Tue Apr 24 1990 14:12 | 25 |
| Brian:
Why put anything new on at all. Horizons is supposed to be one of the
multi-year paints. I'd suggest touching up the spots where the paint
has worn thin and then wet sanding the older areas lightly with 400
grit just before launching. The light sanding should be enough to
expose fresh toxicant. Save yourself a few hundred bucks.
I'm not sure there's much advantage to putting on a hard paint on a
cruiser. They're no more effective and they're brutal to remove. I
and others have had good success putting on thick bodied bottom paints
with airless sprayers. They are designed for latex paints which have
about the same consistency as bottom paint. The advantage over a
roller is that the paint doesn't have a chance to dry prematurly.
Unlike a compressor driven spayer, a high volatility reducer is not
needed.
If Murphy hasn't written a law on bottom paints, I propose the
following: All bottom paints lose their toxicity just as the water
reaches it's maximum temperature. This usually occurs on or about
August 1.
- gene
|
1146.10 | Too late - bottom "cleaned" | RECYCL::MCBRIDE | | Tue Apr 24 1990 15:35 | 8 |
| Too late. The bottom is 99& clean again so we are faced with staring
all over anyway. I like the idea of the airless sprayer though. I had
forgotten you used one. Do you thin the paint first? Should the
gelcoat be wiped with solvent to clean it first? Should the gel coat
be hit with sandpaper first to roughen up the surface? Is priming
required?
Brian
|
1146.11 | | STEREO::HO | | Tue Apr 24 1990 16:56 | 31 |
| Whoops. Too late I guess. Quite an expensive boat bath last fall!
On roughing up the bottom. The instructions all say to do this. OK if
new bottom paint is going on over old bottom paint. Not such a good
idea if you're applying over a bare bottom. The minute scratches just
invite osmosis. I'd just wipe the hull down with acetone using clean
rags or paper towels. When it's squeeky clean, you're ready to shoot.
I haven't had any adhesion problems doing this.
For airless spraying, use a nozzle intended for latex paint (a large
diameter one) and try using the paint unthinned. Set the volume
adjuster for maximum flow. If, after the flow has been established,
the paint comes out in globs, add thinner by the teaspoon, mix, and try
again. It takes surprisingly little thinner before the paint starts to
run as it hits the hull. Remember to wear a respirator, goggles,
gloves, and old foul weather gear when doing this. Can get messy.
Fine line tape works well getting a crisp waterline. To protect the
rest of the boat against overspray, tear a pile of newspapers in half.
Then make a circuit of the boat leaving 4 peices of masking tape at 2.5
foot intervals all the way around. Make a second pass around with the
newspapers using the pieces of tape to secure them to the hull. If you
pull the part that abuts on the fine line tape tight, it won't be
necessary to tape the bottom or sides of the newspapers. The spray
won't get in. It's a good idea to spray the overhead surfaces first,
then the vertical ones. That way there'll be less sputtering as the
level of paint falls below the siphon tube intake.
have fun
- gene
|
1146.12 | Better yet, a fire hose | AITG::COUTURE | Abandon shore | Tue Apr 24 1990 17:03 | 9 |
| If you try spraying Horizon 2, YOU'LL BE SORRY. Even the widest
nozzel made won't do much for paint the consistency of cold honey and
the thinner just separates out, leaving almost no copper in the little
pools it forms. If it were anything else, even Red Hand, I'd shut
up.
The sad voice of experience
|
1146.13 | Since you're this far | TARGON::DRUEKE | | Thu Apr 26 1990 11:07 | 10 |
|
Since the bottom is bare to the gelcoat, you might consider applying
a 'barrier coat' before the bottom paint. I helped sand elysium's
bottom last year and the owner, NETMAN::CARTER, put a barrier on before
proceeding. The rationale was that barrier helps resist blisters which
cost a bundle to repair and while we were 'that close' why not.
Hope this catches you in time if you decide to think about barriers.
Ray.
|
1146.14 | | STEREO::HO | | Thu Apr 26 1990 14:03 | 3 |
| I'm in the market for a barrier coat. What did the NETMAN use?
- gene
|
1146.15 | Fresh Water! | MEMORY::LAZGIN | | Thu Apr 26 1990 17:03 | 7 |
| I'm putting a 19' Cape Cod Knockabout into fresh water, in fact, a
reservoir in New Hampshire.
What Non Toxic paints may I use?
Frank
|
1146.16 | Do you really want / need to paint? | MSCSSE::FRENCH | Bill French, PKO3-1/22D, 223-3004 | Fri Apr 27 1990 09:22 | 21 |
| Many of us who sail in fresh water do not use bottom paint.
My manufacturer (Hutchinson - Com Pac Yacht) recommends a hard bottom
paint, but of course he would, as he might be the recipeint of
claims from any blistering.
I assume that the Cape Cod Knockabout is a fibreglass boat, correct?
Marine growth is MUCH less in fresh water - I brush my bottom off
a couple of times a sesaon.
Blistering is less of a problem in fresh water and less of a problem
in cold water.
This is my sixth season of sailing without ever having applied bottom
paint. (or having had any blisters) I must be about at the break even
point at having saved the cost (both in $ and labor) w.r.t. a blister
repair job. And is is one less messy job in the spring.
Bill
|
1146.17 | | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Fri Apr 27 1990 09:38 | 3 |
| Having just been through this fun job, all I can say is that if bottom
painting is "optional" in your particular situation, then don't even
think about exercising that option!!
|
1146.18 | elysium wears Interlux 2000/2001 | NETMAN::CARTER | | Fri Apr 27 1990 13:16 | 37 |
| The barrier coat which Ray and I put on elysium last year is Interlux.
I think the part numbers are 2000 and 2001. A fun to work with, two
part epoxy. The containers specify min and max times between coats.
Several coats are required to build up the required thinkness of I thin
12 mils. I used four coats, which required two gallons for a C+C
29-fin keel, spade rudder.
The stuff comes with two cans, one about quart size. One gallon size.
The gallon can is not filled. The contents of the small can plus the
contents of the big can equal a gallon. But you can't use the whole
gallon at one time. It has a limited amount of time in which to use it
after mixing it.
When I started working on elysium last year, I had no intention of
using a barrier coat. I was going to remove all of the bottom paint
for an area of about a foot near the waterline. The yard apes at the
marina mentioned several times that as long as I was going that far, I
should go all the way and do the barrier coat. I resisted, but....
Just days after I finished the barrier coat application, Practical
Sailor came out with their test results of blistering, what causes it,
and what prevents it. Also, what happens to bottom paint applied over
barrier coats which may be incompatable. Their findings seemed to be,
a barrier coat probably won't hurt, as long as any gelcoat which is
exposed and abraded in preparation for the barrier coat application is
properly coated. They went on to say that some brands of topsides
enamael applied below the water line are probably equally as effective
as most of the barrier coats.
Would I do it again? Ya, probably. I don't know the propensity for C+C
hulls to blister. I keep the boat is Salem Harbor which tends to be
very warm, conditions which have been said to have a positive
correlation with blisters.
djc
|
1146.19 | paste wax in fresh water | 30188::SCHUMANN | Dead Endian | Fri Apr 27 1990 13:57 | 11 |
| re -.? fresh water
I have an O'Day Javelin that I keep in fresh water. I use automotive paste
wax on the bottom. It doesn't reduce the accumulation of slime, but it makes
it easier to remove. I also brush off the bottom once or twice during the
season with a stiff brush. (This is easy if your lake is warm enough to
swim in.) When the boat comes out of the water, clean the bottom with a stiff
brush WHILE THE BOTTOM IS STILL WET. It's much harder to remove the slime after
it's had a chance to dry.
--RS
|
1146.20 | blisters happen in fresh water too | 30188::SCHUMANN | Dead Endian | Fri Apr 27 1990 14:01 | 9 |
| re blisters:
Two of three boats I've had in fresh water have had blistering problems. I'm
not sure whether the paste wax helps resist blisters. I believe it should,
because the wax is inherently water repellent. My Javelin got a few small
blisters before I started using the wax. They haven't gotten worse since I
started using the wax.
--RS
|
1146.21 | They're everywhere | NETMAN::CARTER | | Fri Apr 27 1990 15:46 | 10 |
| Something I read a while back led me to believe that boats in fresh
water were possibly more prone to blistering than boats in salt water.
I don't rememebr the source. Practical Sailor and Cruising World are
two potential sources which spring to mind.
Something about salt water being less viscous, not penetrating the gel
coat as easily as fresh water.
djc
|
1146.22 | Fresh is more prone to blisters | NWD002::SASLOW_ST | STEVE | Fri Apr 27 1990 17:22 | 3 |
| Note .21 is correct. Boats that blister will blister faster in fresh
water than salt. It is related to the density of the water as stated.
|
1146.23 | Tale of the polyestermite | AIADM::SPENCER | Commuter from the other Cape | Sun Apr 29 1990 17:23 | 53 |
| RE: .14,
Alan (with help from crew) put 4 thin epoxy barrier coats on TOWARD
MORNING a couple years ago. When he gets back, he'll probably have a few
comments to offer, and can tell you what brand he used.
RE: fresh vs. salt in osmotic blistering,
Theoretically a boat in fresh water should blister faster. Density per se
isn't the reason, but rather the percentage of dissolved solute. Osmosis
is the transfer of water, molecule by molecule, from a region of lesser
solute concentration to a region of greater, until the concentration of
solute in each is equalized, at which point osmosis stops. The region of
greater concentration is the tiny water-filled bubble under your gelcoat;
the region of lesser concentration is the ocean (or lake). Since that end
point would require an equally high concentration of solutes in the worlds
oceans, it's unlikely to happen (despite Exxon's attempts to help Alaskan
fishermen reduce their osmotic blistering problem by raising the solute
conentration in Price William Sound last year.) The more common end point
is the bubble growing until it bursts, at which point the concentration is
immediately equalized, and the ocean can start dissolving the resin
directly.
As water--even a few molecules--finds a little space under the gelcoat to
form the beginning of a little pool, the concentration of solute inside it
is high, practically infinitely higher than fresh water with almost no
dissolved mineral, and plenty higher than salt at 20-25 ppm around NE, and
32-45 ppm in the tropics. The rate of transfer is somewhat proportional
(maybe not linearly--I don't know) to the difference in concentrations.
The unfortunate fact is, if there's *any* difference, and there's any
pathway large enough for single molecules to pass through, then osmosis
will occur.
The only two solutions to the problem are to A) use materials that won't
dissolve or B) block the pathways of transmission. "A" isn't practical,
though some materials are better than others (vinylester vs polyester
resins, for instance). Just about everything dissolves to some degree,
and all it takes is the minutest dissolution to set up the osmotic
imbalance. Also, the need to meet structural requirements is much more
important. "B" is the best choice; regular paint doesn't work, because as
the vehicle evaporates (another way of describing paint drying) it leaves
microscopic holes all over--perfect for water molecules to pass through.
(Otherwise, how would paint ever dry completely?)
The necessary antidote is to use a two-part epoxy system, which catalyzes
from a liquid to a solid without opening voids. The other solution is to
drysail, which removes the water from the outside before it can collect
under the gelcoat. Water would rather evaporate into the air through
those tiny pores than stay within the hull.
A relatively non-technical description of a rather technical problem, I hope.
J.
|
1146.24 | debate is over, the yard made the choice | RECYCL::MCBRIDE | | Mon Apr 30 1990 11:25 | 14 |
| Our debate was ended for us while we weren't looking! It appears the
yard took the liberty of painting the bottom for us "while they were at
it". I seems alot of stuff got done "while they were at it". We have no
idea what was used and at the price my partner says he doesn't want to
know for fear of what the answer might be. The new paint seems fairly
hard and according to the yard should prove to be quite durable from both
anti fouling and wear perspectives. We shall see how it fairs when given
the test of time in the water. As for speaking with Petit, I think we
will persue the exchange or return of our remaining Horizons 2 per an
earlier suggestion unless of course someone in here would like to buy
it.......
Brian
|
1146.25 | One more year, please | AKOV12::DJOHNSTON | | Mon Apr 30 1990 11:41 | 9 |
| Well we took advantage of the beautiful weather on Saturday and wet
sanded our bottom and looked for touch up areas. The finish is still
great. We used heavy duty nylon scouring pads to burnish the paint.
I was watching others sanding and painting their whole bottoms and
thanked goodness I escaped that for one more year. This will be the
third year on this paint. By wet sanding we exposed new toxin and are
hoping it will do the job.
Dave
|
1146.26 | West System barrier coat? | 2EASY::JONES | | Mon Apr 30 1990 12:29 | 21 |
| re .18
Having just laid on 4 coats of West system epoxy/barrier coat, I'm
curious about what Practical Sailor had to say about this with a VC17
bottom paint combination. This seems to be the combination of choice
at Fay's boatyard on Lake Winny. It is certainly hassle free to apply.
It is an older boat and though there are no blisters, the gel coat was
brittle and flaky in places. Seemed like a barrier coat was a prudent
way to go.
The barrier additive is some sort of aluminum powder which is mixed
with the epoxy before application. The proportions are seemingly quite
thin, as several coats only give a very light grey tint. Does anyone
have experience with the West System as a barrier coating?
Ron
|
1146.27 | Need bottom paint for a freshwater boat in NH | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Thu Jul 01 1993 20:43 | 14 |
| Does any of you know what bottom paints are allowed or not allowed on
boats in NH freshwater?
I've just been given a sailboat by my parents, and it needs a new
coating of bottom paint.
The boat will live the rest of its life on Lake Winnipesaukee.
Any suggestions, or just the name of a paint *known* to be acceptable
on that lake will be much appreciated.
Thanks.
John H-C
|
1146.28 | Do you really want to keep painting it? | MASTR::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Fri Jul 02 1993 09:51 | 13 |
| John,
Many of us do not paint our bottoms on the Lake. I am on Winnipesuakee
from early May to mid-November. I brush off my bottom a couple of times
a season.
If you didn't already have a painted bottom, I would suggest that it is
not worth the time and trouble. Since yours already has been painted,
you might want to repaint it, but it is nowhere as necessary as
in salt water.
Bill
|
1146.29 | I hate painting things, really. | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Fri Jul 02 1993 15:26 | 8 |
| Thanks for the comments, Bill. The boat just came out of the Gulf of
Mexico after spending three years there. I believe the bottom paint was
removed with this season's barnacles, but I'm not sure.
I should be seeing the boat for the first time in a looooong time at
some point this weekend.
John H-C
|
1146.30 | VC-17m on the lake | SMURF::LANZA | | Tue Aug 03 1993 18:01 | 3 |
| Many of on the lake use VC-17m. This is a teflon based paint that
doesn't need to be sanded and so forth each year. Nothing seems to
grow on it and the only thing we do is clean along the water line.
|