T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1134.1 | Passengers for hire? | CDR::SPENCER | John Spencer | Thu Feb 23 1989 16:40 | 17 |
| Jeff,
Best wishes on your trip.
One thought you may wish to consider: The USCG recently considers *any*
payment made to the owner of a vessel (bringing the beer, for instance) to
be cause for considering those on board, other than the permanent crew, to
be passengers for hire. And therefore requiring a licensed captain.
It's a sticky situation, one that many are protesting for obvious reasons.
But for now, it's what they're enforcing. If anything went wrong....
Advertising a ride for a price mightn't help your case.
Parade-rainer-on,
J.
|
1134.2 | SHARE, NOT PAY! | CSSE::GARDINER | Architects-R-Us | Fri Feb 24 1989 14:55 | 22 |
| You're correct. The Coast Guard has set several precedents about
paying for cruising. Sharing expenses has been common for "friends"
to use to circumvent this. The air-fare has nothing to do with
the cost (or fare) of the cruise. Sharing the expenses for food
and drink will fit the Coast Guard's guidelines if the burden is
equal to all on-board.
If I (the skipper) spends $300 on food and charge each of 2 crew
members $100 each and assume $100 myself, then all OK. What fails
the rules is when the skipper charges the crew $150 each and doesn't
pay anything himself. This is not "expense sharing", this is paying
expenses for the trip.
Reality is that maritime law has always been ambiguous. When some
maritime authority wants to get you on something they will, but
thankfully most people don't have any problems.
Thanks for the advice,
Jeff
|
1134.3 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Fri Feb 24 1989 15:20 | 13 |
| Hmmmmm, expense sharing is legal, charging for the trip isn't (assuming
you lack a Coast Guard license). Alright, what expenses must be shared?
Food, fuel, customs fees, etc, seem obvious candidates for shared
expenses. Assume that I am planning a similar trip and that I buy a
windvane and a liferaft solely and expressly for the trip. Does my crew
have to share the cost of the windvane and liferaft equally for me to
remain within the bounds of the law?
It seems like an essential item of cruising equipment is a lawyer tucked
into the bilge.
:-)
|
1134.4 | Better Yet | WBC::RODENHISER | | Fri Feb 24 1989 15:55 | 6 |
| > It seems like an essential item of cruising equipment is a lawyer tucked
> into the bilge.
I thought these were better tucked under the keel?
|
1134.5 | Too much drag! | PAILUM::STODDARD | Just toolin' around... | Fri Feb 24 1989 16:09 | 6 |
| re .4
No! Definitely not...too much drag. Low in the bilge (under the
cabin sole, or maybe under the engine) is just right.
|
1134.6 | Valuable Considerations? | MAMIE::ADUNNIGAN | | Mon Feb 27 1989 09:07 | 15 |
| For what its worth......the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
Subchapter C, 46 CFR, Part 24.10-3, defines carrying passengers
for hire as:
"The carriage of any person or persons by a vessel for a valuable
consideration, whether directly or indirectly flowing to the owner,
charterer, operator, agent, or any other person interested in the
vessel."
I am sure that a lawyer could provide many interesting interpretations
for this law.
Al
|
1134.7 | ANY LAWYERS WANT TO CREW TO ST.CROIX?? | CSSE::GARDINER | Architects-R-Us | Mon Feb 27 1989 15:49 | 20 |
| RE: .-1 Thanks for the quote of the code. As I stated earlier
Maritime Law is sufficiently ambiguous to convict anyone of anything,
anytime, anywhere!
I didn't realize that I would be creating a "Lawyer Joke" note.
Do you know the differnece between a dead skunk in the road and
a dead lawyer in the road???
Skid marks in front of the skunk!
Yuk, yuk.
|
1134.8 | Sorry, couldn't resist | AKOV12::DJOHNSTON | | Mon Feb 27 1989 18:15 | 22 |
| What do you have when you have a lawyer buried up to his neck in
sand?
Not enough sand.
Dave
|
1134.9 | | CURIE::THACKERAY | Ray Thackeray MR03 DTN 297-5622 | Tue Feb 28 1989 13:01 | 3 |
| Heard the one about the lawyer on his deathbed.....looking through
the bible for loopholes?
|
1134.10 | Jeffs in Bermuda | NAC::R_MCGARRY | | Mon Jun 26 1989 15:19 | 6 |
|
I received a call from Jeff this morning. He is in Bermuda and
is fine.
|
1134.11 | Another lawyer hack | ICS::WANNOOR | | Wed Mar 17 1993 23:51 | 25 |
| What do you call a sailboat full of lawyers that sinks?
a beginning!
|
1134.12 | Maritime lawyer needed. After all, they wrote the book... | ICS::WANNOOR | | Thu Mar 18 1993 00:06 | 28 |
| Anyway, back to the subject. Here's an excerpt from Chapman's, under
"Commercial operation":
"The Coast Guard has ruled that the following situations...constitute
instances of carrying passengers for hire:
[4 instances given I quote one of them here]:
If there is a prearranged plan or agreement in advance that the guests
are to pay their proportionate share, or any specific amount, of the
cruise expenses"
Immediately below, however, there is the following passage:
"If the participants in an expense-sharing cruise are members of a
bona-fide "joint venture", they are then all considered under the law
to be "owners" and not "passengers", and thus no licensed operator
would be required"
Chapmans goes on to state that this must all be set down in writing,
that each person must have the right to full posession, control and
navigation of the craft. A mere "share the expenses" is not enough to
establish a joint venture, and liability must also be considered.
How this can be legally achieved completely escapes me, let alone
allowing everyone on any craft have the right to demand control and
navigation!! This whole thing is either insane, arcane or inane, or all
three.
|
1134.13 | long-distance cruising is for the self-reliant | MAST::SCHUMANN | The MOSFET: over 1,000,000,000,000,000 sold | Thu Mar 18 1993 10:02 | 14 |
| Personally, I'm of the opinion that lawyers should be consulted less, not more.
Of course, that exposes you to some added legal risk. But then, if you're
willing to sail from Boston to S.F. taking passengers along the way, you can't
be completely risk-averse...
If your boat sinks, and somebody drowns, you will probably be sued and will
end up penniless, regardless of the lawyerly details. Even so, you'll presumably
feel much worse about the companion who drowned than about the personal
fortune you've lost.
If you're willing to take the risks, go ahead and take the risks.
--RS
|
1134.14 | crew for Bermuda and beyond | TFH::KTISTAKIS | Mike K. | Wed Jul 06 1994 11:31 | 44 |
| Crew wanted for a late October 1994 trip to Bermuda and from there on
to USVI.
I would like a couple of crew for each leg.Can be the same crew for
both legs if they wish.
The crew: Preferebly at least one with Ocean voyage experience,will be
responsible for their airfair to the boat,if they are not onboard the
first leg to Bermuda and again for the airfair from St.Thomas back to
their home.They should also bring with them their own safety harness.
Expenses while onboard would be appx. $ 50-60/wk for food and $15.00
for the Bermuda clearance fee each person.
The itinarary: I would like to leave Newport late afternoon on Friday
Oct.21
Newport to Bermuda 6-9 days
Arrival St.George 27-30 Oct.
Enjoy Bermuda till 6-7 Nov.
Departure from Bermuda 6-7 Nov.
Arriving St.Thomas 13-15 Nov.
Crew can leave the boat or stay onboard for one more week sailing the
VI's
The boat: She is a 32' LOD heavy displacement(17,000 lb.) cutter(Down
Eastern) She is equiped with a 30hp Fresh water cooled Yanmar, just
overhauled by Mac Boring,VHF,DEPTH,LORAN,GPS,A/P,RDF,SSB,RADAR,WIND
VAIN,200mi EPIRB and a plastic sextant(I probably get an ASTRA sextant
too)Have already paid and wait for delivery of a 6 man double floor
offshore Avon Liferaft from England(thanks to the notes in this file by
John Rodenisher and Alan and Pete Gough from U.K. they saved me a lot of
money for the liferaft and a 45lb.CQR).
There would be double jack lines(one 7/32 wire and the other 1" nylon
webbing,trysail hooked permanately to a second sail track on the mast
and a storm jib hooked permanetly on second forstay.Unfortunatelly no
refrigitation or air condition.
The boat is still on the hard where will be surveyed next week and
then go in the water.I owe this boat seven years and did not have
any major problem or insurance claims with her.
The Captain : Old,age 57 former merchant mariner,former Navy only 8-9
years experience on sailboats.Have been around the world on big ships
still occassionaly get sea sick. US master 50 ton,USPS full
certificate respect but not afraid of the deep.Sometimes uneasy near
lee shore,two groundings have not erase my uneasyness.
Have sailed from New york to Maine. Longest trip Newport-Mnt.Desert
Island Maine.
If you are interested please send mail with some kind of sailing resume
to: Jupitr::Ktistakis or phone DTN 237-2208
|
1134.15 | | CFSCTC::CLAFLIN | | Wed Jul 06 1994 14:42 | 17 |
| I have sailed with Mike for one weekend, down to Cuttyhunk.
Add to the captains ciricula vitae (sic?) that he is pleasant company.
The boat is a comfortable easy motion. Though in our case Buzzard's Bay was
dead flat.
Mike, put me down on the interested, but not yet committed list. Amy and I need
to think this one through.
Incidently, Holiday II is coming to the south side of the Cape. You are welcome
to join us, coastal cruising while you are on the hard.
Mail is on its way.
Doug Claflin
dtn 244-7042
|
1134.16 | | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Jul 06 1994 15:21 | 23 |
| re .14:
Mike,
I assume you've good reasons for leaving so late in the year and for
going offshore. There was a very, very sobering article in Practical
Sailor recently about North Atlantic autumn weather. The chances of good
weather for the Bermuda passage are uncomfortably low, and the bad
weather can be very bad, most especially in the Gulf Stream. At the very
least, I would suggest departing only when there is a good offshore
weather forecast, not departing on a fixed date. Bob Rice of Weather
Services in Bedford, MA, is one of the well-known, for_a_fee weather
forecast providers. (Disclaimer: I have never met him nor have I ever
used his services.)
If I were doing this trip, I'd take the intercoastal Waterway to North
Carolina before heading offshore, at least in the autumn. An autumn
passage to Bermuda is not a passage I would feel comfortable doing,
particularly with inexperienced crew.
signed,
Ever_the_cautious_even_cowardly_sailor
|
1134.17 | No one said it was gonna be easy | MARX::CARTER | | Wed Jul 06 1994 18:59 | 19 |
| I'd have to second Alan's misgivings (I hate to have to say that) about
the weather that time of year. The weather cycles in autumn seem to
shorten from the summery six to seven day cycles to something closer to
five days.
To complicate matters a bit more, there used to be a private radio
operator on Bermuda, Herb lastnameescapesme (Hilgenberg?) who maintained a
seven days a week, after work until the wee-hours, weather net on the
radio. Herb is not a Bermudian and by governement edict his time on
the island is up, and he must return to Canada. Nobody on the island is
ready or able take his place. So, one of the best sources of up-to-the
minute weather reports and forecasts, is no longer available. NOAA
used to use his surface observations to help with their weather
forecasting.
Good luck,
djc
|
1134.18 | tommorrow may be too late. | TFH::KTISTAKIS | Mike K. | Thu Jul 07 1994 11:55 | 35 |
| Well Alan, The trip was schedualed initially last year for June 1994.
Then my Son calls from Florida that he was going to get married on
June.
So, that's that for the scheduale.Then I decided I better do the trip
during Oct.-Nov.if I was going to make it at all.The future is
uncertain at least here at Digital as we all know and I don't even
know if I would be able to support the boat next year(i hope I will).
I believe you agree this is as good a reason to do the voyage.
As for the hardship of the trip, a friend of mine was told by a friend
of his who circumnavigated around the world that the worst weather he
enconter was at the Horn and during the Boston to Bermuda trip.
I also think that it was Ernest Hemminway (sp) who said that Bermuda is
paradise but to go there you have to go through the purgatory.I bet he
didn't use the airlines.
On the other hand reading some Bermudian( O.K promotional) material
it states that small craft complete succesfull passages all seasons
and a well found 35'overall boat with 4 experience crew is adequate
for normal Ocean passage.
But what is normal excluding the hurricane season.If you go through the
trip logs in this file of your trip,Gardiners and Al Dunnigans it
seems that it cannot get worst(I know it can) and you guys went the
best of the time.
What I am trying to say is that anyone who has some knowledge of the
North Atlantic should know that it is not going to be sailing on
the lake regardless of the time of the passage.Agree that some times
I would avoid completely and as a matter of fact I only would go there
during June or late Oct.-Nov.
You see my main concern is the North wall of the Gulf stream and I have
read that during Oct -Nov the water temp.of the N edge of the Gulf
stream is closer to the water temp.of the atlantic side therefore
the chances of bad weather at that point is less than that in the
somer.
As far as the N atlantic is concerned a good forecast before you leave
keep an eye on the barometer every hour listen to the forcasts from
the radio and pray a little.And yes Herb is gone.
|
1134.19 | | TFH::KTISTAKIS | Mike K. | Thu Jul 07 1994 11:59 | 3 |
| somer is the new spelling for summer.I never sai I can spell!
|
1134.20 | | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Thu Jul 14 1994 11:33 | 13 |
| Mike, why is this trip done offshore ?
(sorry for my ignorance, I never studied the passage along the East
Coast of the US)
What keeps you from harbour hoping down the coast to Florida and
then sailing to the VI ?
I wish you all the best and fine weather. Thanks for the help you
gave me.
Peter
|
1134.21 | TIME AND DISTANCE MUCH GREATER | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Flick of my BIC Scarecrow? | Thu Jul 14 1994 13:37 | 11 |
| The time it would take to harbor hop, and the total distance travelled
would be quite a bit longer than a more direct route. The distance
from Florida to the USVI is smoething likr 1200 miles. Boston to
Bermuda is about 750 and bermuda to USVI is another 1500. Boston to
Florida is 1200.
Folks that have the time take several weeks to get to Florida via the
intracoastal waterway.
Brian
|
1134.22 | Bermuda mon amour | TFH::KTISTAKIS | Mike K. | Thu Jul 14 1994 14:10 | 34 |
| Peter Hi!
I see your point,but I think you assume that because the VI's are the
final destination why this guy is going the rough and long way.
First of all if it was that way and the same time period,yes I would
go harbour hoping through the intercoastal to Florida,then Bahamas and
finally to VI's.
The reason I want to go offsore is because I want to go to Bermuda.
A passage to Bermuda by an East coast sailor is like a pilgrimage.
Make it
double pilgrimage for the first timer.Reversing the schedule
and go to Bermuda from the VI's doesn't make sense to me for a lot
of reasons,major one is that the boat stays in the caribbean after the
trip.
Alan has a good suggestion to go south through the intercoastal to
N.Carolina then cross the gulf stream there which is closer to
land than up northEast and also narrower.There even with a Northern
the first 20 miles of the stream are hellish( I am excluding off
Cape Hatteras where the higher wind speeds over North Atlantic
have been recorded)But then we fall in the time restrictions and
the availability of crew.If I was crew I wouldn't do the Intercoastal
unless I had plenty of time to visit and enjoy the harbours and inlets
of the South among their hospitality.Besides in the Intercoastal the
sailboat becomes rather a powerboat.
Well Peter I am not a macho man nor am I a masochist but doing this
trip I know there will be some weather.But with good preparation
vigilance and good common sense it could be just another voyage.
Again Have a good, safe and happy sail and wish you you win the
speed race of the ARC during the crossing.
Mike K.
|
1134.23 | | HAEXLI::PMAIER | | Fri Jul 15 1994 03:51 | 21 |
| Oooh, I start to understand the problems getting to Bermuda.
(I had a long discussion last night with my navigator, my wife)
June is rather early in the year (unsettled weather), but just
at the beginning of the hurrican season
July would be best for settled weather, but well inside the
hurrican/tropical depression/tropical storm time
August the same as July, but increased chances of hurricans
September the same as August, first large depressions coming in
October decreasing hurricans, increasing unsettled weather
November last hurricans, first winterstorms
Is that correct ?
Peter
|
1134.24 | | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Fri Jul 15 1994 09:59 | 20 |
| re .23:
As I recall the Pilot Charts, the chances encountering a severe storm or
hurricane is actually quite low in May, June, and July, especially
north of Bermuda. The average is something like one or so severe
depression (meaning more than gale force winds) in the entire
Carribbean/North Atlantic per month. Even August isn't too likely. When
we went to Bermuda, our insurance company insisted that we do the trip
before the beginning of August (which says that they weren't worried
about May through July weather). I've made the trip in both May and
July.
The Pilot Charts are considerably more interesting for August through
Novemer, both wind and sea conditions. As Dave Carter mentioned, the
time between weather patterns/fronts becomes much less in autumn, and
the chances of good weather for the passage from the US to Bermuda are
not high. I encountered winds over 30 knots in both July and May (in May
it happened in the Gulf Stream heading north).
Alan
|