T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1050.1 | Fault Tolerant | CECV03::WARDROP | | Mon Nov 28 1988 12:37 | 13 |
| Don't you just love the way manufacturers get sooo immaginative
and creative in rationalizing how it was that their product wasn't
at fault. Especially in situations where the real cause is unlikely
to be discovered.
It sounds like whatever kind of switch you settle on, you should
have two. Wire two switches in parallel so your whole boat isn't
risked on a single $15 part with a proven high failure rate. You
may even want to install a second pump as backup and have two redundant
systems. Don't forget to check them indepentantly now and then.
Rick,
|
1050.2 | redundant systems | BRUTWO::BAHLIN | | Mon Nov 28 1988 16:45 | 23 |
| I second the backup system. Mind you I don't have one myself but
that is the beauty of this file you get to spend other people's
money on speculative fixes :^). Seriously, I've really considered
this strongly.
My thinking was something like this...... a small (<1500GPH) pump
with float mounted at lowest possible point in bilge. The backup
system has a pickup and float at a higher level. This means the
small [cheap] system is getting the bulk of the wear and tear doing
the day to day drip maintenance and the big [expensive] system is
in reserve, mothballed until the prime system fails.
Also, this system provides you with reserve capacity when needed
at sea. Each pump should be provided with a manual override switch
(out of the bilge) and I would think it is safer to make all splices
as high as possible, ideally in the same panel as your override
switches (at least not in the bilge).
I also would like some good ideas for a cheap monitoring system
that would allow one to detect run time on these pumps. I was thinking
about an engine hour meter as a cheap method but maybe counting
on/off cycles is easier or better.
|
1050.3 | check the pump before spring | BRUTWO::BAHLIN | | Mon Nov 28 1988 16:54 | 19 |
| Sorry 'bout this but I forgot your original comments while spending
your money.........
You might have something wrong with your pump that is causing the
switches to be eaten. A few shorted turns in the windings might
cause excess current conditions (enough to quickly eat a switch).
I too think that 'Rule explanation' is a fantasy. If there was
enough resistance to heat the switch to oblivion I would think this
would be enough current to allow the pump to run (slowly maybe but
nevertheless...). Also that much current in an unplanned current
path would have caused some powerful (and quite noticeable) corrosion
in the path.
Do these pumps have diode protection? I don't know if the typical
'Rule' is protected but would think that the lack of protection
could also take out a poorly designed/manufactured switch from arcing.
Just a thought.
|
1050.4 | well, maybe | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Nov 28 1988 17:17 | 35 |
| re .0:
Hmmmm, at first I thought that Rule's explanation of the switch failure
was implausible at best. After further thought, the explanation makes
some sense.
As the resistance of the switch contacts increases, the voltage drop
across the contacts also increases, which results in power dissipation
(heating) in the switch. If you assume that the bilge pump motor is a
pure resistive load, then the power dissipated in the switch will be at
a maximum when the resistance of the switch contacts equals the
resistance of the pump motor. For example, if the pump motor draws 12
amperes normally, then under the right (wrong) conditions, some 36 watts
would be dissipated in the switch. This could well be enough to cause
dramatic switch failure. Of course, the pump isn't going to run very
fast with a large voltage drop across the switch, but if you're not
there listening to it you might not notice.
How long it would take for enough water to cause failure to reach the
switch internals is another question. I can't quite accept capillary
action would cause a failure quickly, but a manufacturing defect that
allowed water into the switch might.
re .3:
The Rule pumps are not reverse polarity protected -- they simply run
backwards (and don't pump much water) if improperly connected. It would
be nice if the pump manufacturers would put long wires (say 25') on the
pumps instead of 18" or so. The short wires almost force you to have
connections in the bilge.
An engine hour meter to measure pump running time isn't a bad idea -- it
will give those of you with leaky boats an idea of how much leaking is
occurring.
|
1050.5 | A no-float solution? | NAC::P_RICKARD | | Mon Nov 28 1988 18:06 | 15 |
| I installed a Waterwitch Switch to my rule bilge pump. It has the
advantage of no moving parts to get jamed with debris. It is solid
state and has a sensor which if senses water for 12 continuous seconds
completes the connection to the bilge pump. I've been told that
it can fail if it gets greasy but in my clean bilge it worked fine.
During one period of long absence with torrential downpours along
with leaky ports and mast boot it cycled on and off some 150 times!
Another advantage is that it takes up practically no room.
(I'm not entirely sure I've got the correct name, I purchased it
through Coast Navigation in Annapolis).
Pam Rickard
|
1050.6 | On the proposed diode... | BTO::JPETERS | John Peters, DTN 266-4391 | Wed Nov 30 1988 10:47 | 6 |
| The diode's not to protect the pump from reverse polarity, it's to
protect the switch from an inductive voltage spike from the motor's
windings when the switch opens.
J
|
1050.7 | how waterproof is it? | MLCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Nov 30 1988 17:37 | 10 |
| re .5:
The Waterwitch sounds good ..... but solid state (electronics) in the
bilge? Ye gods, the waterproofing had better be absolutely perfect if it
is going be reliable for long.
It is easy to wire bilge pumps so that they can be turned on by either a
float switch or manually -- perhaps a good idea if float switch failure is
common.
|