T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1021.1 | he's a what???? | HAVOC::GREEN | | Fri Oct 21 1988 17:41 | 9 |
| Yes, but I am sure he does it slowly without throwing 3 foot swells
at sailing craft, polluting the tranquility with the roar of unmuffled
jet engines, fouling the atmosphere with unconsumed hydrocarbons,
requesting female guests leave most of their clothes below, or
adding to the national debt by requesting S&R assistance when he
runs out of gas (which I understand is the Webster's definition
of s_potter). :-}
|
1021.2 | An engine does not a stink-pot make ... | MPGS::BAILEYB | May the 4 winds blow u safely home | Sat Oct 22 1988 20:39 | 60 |
| I'm afraid you're forgetting something that a "stink-potter" wouldn't
really be expected to think about. If you do a lot of cruising on
a sailboat (i.e. off-shore, or long trips along the coast) and you live
aboard, you have to run the engine every day just to keep your
batteries charged, whether you're sailing or not. I can conceive of
someone who does a lot of cruising having to run their engine 100 hours
in a season and never putting the engine in gear. That's an unfortunate
fact of life aboard a sailboat ... sooner or later you HAVE to run the
engine or your batteries will die. It seems like Alan does a lot of
cruising. I'd be willing to bet that that accounts for a significant
number of engine-hours over the course of 9 seasons.
Also, when you run the engine on a sailboat, the chances are the only
people on the water you're going to bother are the ones on YOUR boat.
The same cannot be said for "stink-pots". Most sailboats come equipped
with small diesel engines or outboards, neither of which can compete in
terms of "stink" with what you find on comparably sized powerboats.
But while we're on the subject, I'd like to suggest that not all
powerboaters should be referred to as "stink-potters", and not all
powerboats should be called "stink-pots".
I think "stink-pots" are a subclass of "powerboat". And "stink-potters"
are a subclass of "powerboaters" which are a subclass of "boaters".
Stink-pots fall under one of three categories:
1. "Noise-pots" - These are the ones that pollute the air with noise.
They're so noisy they start to bother you as soon as they get
within five miles. Best example is the cigarette boat, with four
big exhaust pipes sticking out the back and not a hint of a
muffler. Of course, the people riding inside one of these beasties
don't mind the noise. They're moving faster than the speed of sound
and can't hear it anyway.
2. "Rodney-pots" - These are the 30 to 40 foot, two-story tubs that
simply HAVE to pass within 20 feet of your bow at 30 MPH. There
are usually people up on the flying bridge waving at you with
lobotomized looking smiles on their faces. The owners of boats in
this category are known as "Rodneys", because they don't give anybody
any respect. They are the ones who slow down to 15 MPH while going
through a 5 MPH NO WAKE zone, just fast enough to throw a wake that
lifts your boat above fender-height and throws it into the dock.
3. "Lobster-pots" - These are the literal stink-pots. Working boats
with evil smelling engines. This particular species can always be
spotted by the dual trails of blue-white exhaust and seagulls.
About all you can do with these is wish the owners extra-good luck
so they can afford to buy a new boat. Unfortunately they'll
probably end up selling this one to their brother-in-law, Louie,
so he can start up his own business ... in the mooring area.
The majority of power-boats don't fit into any of these categories, and
so they can't really be called stink-pots.
My opinion, what do you think ??
... Bob
|
1021.3 | "Sink the Rodneys" | SALEM::KLOTZ | | Mon Oct 24 1988 10:45 | 33 |
| re: .2
Bob -- I couldn't agree more -- Love your xxx-pots definitions.
Even being a power-type (vs xx-pot) myself it tis frustrating to
see some of the folks out there that can simply lay out some $$$
& go. I teach seamanship for the Power Squadrons & wish more folks
would not only take the time for a course; but, would also practice
what they preach/hear.
One of the advantages to sail for all of us is that by the nature
of the sport it "seems" to demand more knowledgable captains/crew.
I have had many close encounters due to incompetent "sail" types;
but, would be the first to admit that all damage has been from idiot
"power" (of the Rodney vintage) types.
Never did understand why power boats have to pass within 20' of
all anchored boats they pass. Seems to be the same mentality that
makes a porche change lanes at 85 within 2' of your front bumber with
no blinker.
I'll resist the urge to go on for pages --
& with your permission (already assumed) will use your categories of Noise,
Rodney & Lobster -pots in my course.
(While your on a roll can you categorize the "wind-bags"????)
* Well Allan I guess we'll let it ride under the guise of keeping
your batteries charged.
With_mufflers_no_lobsters_&_no_comment_on_my_wake,
Lou (Phanta Sea)
|
1021.4 | see .2 | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Oct 24 1988 16:48 | 5 |
| The first part of reply .2 is the answer. Yes, we use our 25 hp diesel
mostly to charge the batteries, when anchoring, and in calms when passage
making. We actually sail a few hundred hours per summer.
|
1021.5 | Dollars make Sense | VBV01::HJOHNSON | Hank Johnson DTN 373-5443 | Tue Oct 25 1988 12:52 | 12 |
| Engine hours is only part of the answer. Maybe a guage that measures
hours and RPM to provide a different indication of use.
I do not have an hour indicator and in late July decided I had better
top off the fuel tank after starting the season in March and sailing
three out of four weekends each month, and a three week cruise.
The bill was $ 2.16. Maybe that's the guage to use
Second Wind has a Yanmar 44.
|
1021.6 | correction | VBV01::HJOHNSON | Hank Johnson DTN 373-5443 | Tue Oct 25 1988 12:56 | 6 |
| Gramatical correction in .5
Engine hours *are* only part of the answer.
Proof reading never was a stong suit.
|
1021.7 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Oct 25 1988 13:03 | 11 |
| Yes, typically the fuel consumption of the diesels used in sailboats is
rather low. Our engine uses about 0.5 gallon per hour at cruising speed --
5.7 knots or so -- which indicates that it is producing approximately 8
hp.
Re hours: All of the literature I've seen recommends service intervals
for diesel engines based on hours of use. Idling a diesel to charge the
batteries is worse for the engine than running under full load (or so
I've been told by various engine makers). Since nothing else is
available, an hourmeter seems like a good investment.
|
1021.8 | Definition of a "wind-bag" ... | MPGS::BAILEYB | May the 4 winds blow u safely home | Wed Oct 26 1988 11:19 | 44 |
| RE .3
>> (while your on a roll can you categorize the "wind-bags")
Sure, I'll give it a shot.
As with "stink-pot", the term "wind-bag" really doesn't apply to most
sailboats. Again, I think of "wind-bags" as falling into three different
categories.
1. "Trash-bags" - These are the boats whose owners obviously don't
think there's a style to sailing. By day they drag their fenders.
By night they drag their anchors. By the middle of the season they
drag 6 to 10 inches of growth along on their bottom. The owners of
these boats are to be pitied more than anything else. They are
usually only a danger to themselves, but be prepared to fend them
off if they try to dock next to you. Most of them haven't figured
out the concept of "current" yet. I refer to them as "trash-bags"
because of their tendency to leave a trail of beer cans and other
assorted "disposables" floating in their wake.
2. "Money-bags" - There is a reasonably good description (though a
mite overdone) in Note 1016. The owners of these "boats" think
an adventure on the water is watching the Sunday afternoon football
game from the privacy of their own cabin, whilst sipping Perrier
and munching microwave popcorn. They are a danger to no one, as
they rarely leave the dock.
3. "Hot Air-bags" - These are the racing boats. The "hot" refers to
the fact that it's a fast boat. The "air" refers to the skipper's
tendency to yell a lot. There's always a lot of yelling on one of
these boats. That's because the skipper is usually a successful
professional businessman who only gets to act childish when he's
on his boat. Invariably they have egos bigger than the state of
Iowa and mouths to match. Avoid these at all costs, especially
during a race. Everyone KNOWS that one of these would sooner
collide with you than bear off course. They are a danger to
everyone, particularly their competitors and their crew.
These are the ones I can think of. Maybe somebody else has others ...
... Bob
|