T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
995.1 | make 'em stronger than the line | CADSYS::SCHUMANN | | Wed Sep 28 1988 17:47 | 10 |
| > Is there a way to approximate the load these
> blocks will be under based on sail area?
A somewhat simpler approach to this problem is to size the turning blocks
to be stronger than the breaking strength of the halyard. If the blocks
turn a 90 degree angle, the block will be taking a load aprox. 0.7
times the pull on the line.
--RS
|
995.2 | resources | VLNVAX::FRENIERE | | Wed Sep 28 1988 18:01 | 25 |
| NICRO of Australia has a comple catalog and some subsets that
really cover your questions. I'll see if I can locate mine from
last spring. In the meanwhile you might check with a Harken
dealer for catalogs with design aids.
I have several books on sails & rigging. They cover such a broad
range of sail types, from sunfish to Maxi's tha I've given up
trying top figure loading, etc.
The US Boat catalog gives a good bit of information by lumping
size of boat/rig to various types of blocks. You can select
turning blocks, vangs, sheets, etc adequately.
I like that idea of bringing head sails down with the line from
head to cringle to clew-----etc. When I single hand I usually
stick to my small club jib, which is clubbish acting! Seems
everytime I get back to the point to drop the sails, the wind
picks up and I'm usually glad not to have my Yankee or Genoa
up.
Does anyone have experience with that set up. What are the negatives>
?
Don
|
995.3 | Maine downhaul anyone?? | VLNVAX::FRENIERE | | Wed Sep 28 1988 18:08 | 15 |
| Another question if I may...
My maine uses track and slides. It is a rare time that all of
it just drops when the halyard is released. I have to go forward
and yank some portions of it down. A mess when single handing,
especially when a sea is running.
Yes, my track is in pretty good shape and the slides individually
run free. No, I don't use any lubricant.
I probably have 38 or so feet of luff.
Help anyone?
|
995.4 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Sep 28 1988 19:01 | 49 |
| re .0:
Our halyards are led to the cockpit through Schaefer sheet stoppers. We
use one winch for the mainsheet and main halyard and a second winch for
the two genoa halyards and the staysail halyard. With downhauls on the
headsails, the jibs can be raised and lowered from the cockpit. However,
I am less certain of the benefits of bringing the main halyard aft. Yes,
it does allow raising the main from the cockpit, which is nice. But, you
still have to go on deck to gather in the lowered main, and unless the
main halyard is carefully flaked, it tends to jam at the sheet stopper
(I'm assuming singlehanding here) as the main comes down. Moreover, you
also have to go on deck when reefing for two reasons: to tie in the reef
points to hold the foot of the sail and to attach the reef tack to the
gooseneck. Yes, there are ways to reef the main from the cockpit. For
example, running a line from a padeye at the outer end of the boom up
through the reef clew, back to a block at the outer end of the boom,
forward to a turning block, up to the reef tack, down to a turning block
at the deck, and back to the cockpit). This line is long enough that it
will stretch and chafe under load. Other ways may work better, but the
number of blocks and stopper involved makes the whole business a little
expensive.
re .1: Well, the breaking strengh of 1/2" dacron is about 8500 pounds.
Schaefer recommends, if I remember correctly, a working load of 20% of
the breaking strength of the block, and the recommended working load on
rope is about 20% of breaking strength. Actually, I don't think that
this helps much. Halyard size is most likely chosen for easy handling
rather than needed strength.
Another approach: Barient winch numbers are (or used to be) .01 times
the maximum load the should be placed on the winch, eg, a #19 winch
shouldn't have a load exceeding 1900 pounds. The load on a block turning
a line 90 degrees is (approximately) 1.4 times the tension (load) in the
line. That is, for a 1900 pound tension, the block load is roughly 2700
pounds. A block with a 2700 pound working load is expensive. However,
halyard tensions are much less than 1900 pounds for most boats. We've
used Schaefer turning blocks (90 degree turn) with a 1750 pound safe
working load for sails over 300 sq with no failures (and using Barient
19s for halyard winches). Schaefer (and others) give recommended block
sizes based on sail area. These recommendations have a minor problem --
the manufacturer doesn't want to be sued if a too small block fails, nor
does the manufacturer want to recommend too large a block (cost to the
user). See also the Nicro catalog (ask and they'll send you one).
re .3: Try some lubricant. Our mainsail (37' luff) comes almost all the
way down under its own weight with well lubricated slides (using some
spray teflon stuff). With no lubricant, the sail mostly stays up.
|
995.5 | block loading correction | AHOUSE::GREIST | | Wed Sep 28 1988 19:37 | 15 |
|
>> Is there a way to approximate the load these
>> blocks will be under based on sail area?
>
>A somewhat simpler approach to this problem is to size the turning blocks
>to be stronger than the breaking strength of the halyard. If the blocks
>turn a 90 degree angle, the block will be taking a load aprox. 0.7
>times the pull on the line.
The load will be 1.4 times the pull on the line rather than .7.
---
Al
|
995.6 | | VLNVAX::FRENIERE | | Thu Sep 29 1988 10:05 | 5 |
| re .4
Spray teflon stuff.... could you be a bit more specific...
|
995.7 | real loading desired | UNIVSE::BAHLIN | | Thu Sep 29 1988 13:58 | 20 |
| re .1:
I have to go with .4 on this one. Halyards are sized primarily
to reduce stretch and for easy handling not breaking strength.
Blocks are sized for strength and line diameter/type. I would
guess that for a given line size there is probably a minimum block
strength (provided you stay away from junk). My concern is more
related to the method of attachment and THIS strength should be
based on the expected load plus safety factor. I have a wooden
boat with a keel stepped mast so these blocks are either going to
pull up (@45 degrees) on the deck or up (@45 degrees) on my wooden
mast. If I knew the load I could determine an appropriate attachment
method. My suspicion is that I will end up with a block and halyard
capable of several thousand pounds load that is only carrying a
few hundred pounds of tension.
re .4:
Alan, how are your headsail downhauls rigged?
|
995.8 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Thu Sep 29 1988 14:30 | 36 |
| re downhauls:
Actually, I don't use headsail downhauls much. With a crew of two or
more, someone goes to the foredeck. When singlehanding, the autopilot
steers and I go to the foredeck.
When I use a downhaul, it is a 1/4 inch line tied to the headsail head
cringle, led to a turning block at the base of the stay, and then led
aft to the cockpit through a fairlead or two. There are various ways to
drop the headsail onto the foredeck. One is to winch the sheet tight,
tack so that the headsail is backwinded (it is now positioned over the
deck), release the halyard, and pull the sail down with the downhaul.
The sail comes down, but it is in such a large heap that visibility
forward is often retricted. When the sail is up, I just pull the
downhaul tight and cleat it off. If it is run through the headsail
hanks, there is a substantial amount of friction when pulling the sail
down. If there is any possibility of taking water over the bow, you have
to go forward to tie up the sail anyway. One advantage to a downhaul is
that you can control the halyard (assuming that the halyard is led aft)
while pulling the sail down. If you pull the sail down from the
foredeck, you have to be sure that the halyard doesn't have any kinks
before you go forward.
Fortunately, rigging a downhaul is inexpensive. I'd suggest you try
using one and see if you like it. Taking a headsail down while sailing
downwind works well for me, and since I'm going to the foredeck anyway,
I usually don't use a downhaul. Another problem with a downhaul is that
it is another line cluttering up the cockpit. This may not be a problem
for a sloop, but with the way my cutter is rigged, I have some 17 lines
in the cockpit without any downhauls.
Even though I've said it before, I'll say it again. The most essential
piece of equipment for single or shorthanded sailing is a good
self-steering system.
|
995.9 | | VLNVAX::FRENIERE | | Thu Sep 29 1988 15:47 | 19 |
| re .8 It sounds like my only investment will be to put a cringle
in the Yankee & Jib, a small turning block and a fairlead
or two. I'm going to give it a try. I'll tell you what I
think is the best aspect of it is that it draws the clew
and head together and will serve to keep the sail from
flailing around in wind and sea.
I expect to have to go forward anyhow. I have wheel steering
so I can lock it. However I would be able to reduce the
time needed to be spent on the foredeck. I would be able
to get the sail down with the halyard under control from
the cockpit, and at my convenience go foreward and bag
or lash it down.
And the extra line would only be in place when I single hand
it.
Don
|
995.10 | Why downhauls??? | UNIVSE::BAHLIN | | Thu Sep 29 1988 17:09 | 18 |
| I don't go singlehanding but I do sail with inexperienced
crew/children. In this situation I have found myself (in nasty
conditions) turning over the helm to less experienced people while
going forward to reduce sail. What usually happens is that as soon
as you let the halyard run, the boat changes balance and the helms
person is slow to correct or confused etc.
I thought a downhaul would be convenient in that it would allow you
to reduce the number of things going on at once (this usually reduces
panic). Thus , you could drop the sail into a (temporarily) safe
condition, stabilize your new point of sail, then go bag it when
things are calm in the cockpit.
It also could reduce the danger of going forward with dacron all
over the deck if it clumped it all up to the stay. I have a very
fine entry coupled with a lot of stuff on the foredeck so this is
an important safety feature.
|
995.11 | a suggestion | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Thu Sep 29 1988 17:53 | 9 |
| Try taking down your headsails on a very broad reach. This will minimize
both the apparent windspeed and boat speed. It will also minimize the
motion of the boat. Since the headsail(s) will be in the lee of the
mainsail, there should be little change if any in the heel of the boat
and little if any change in the helm. If you sheet the headsail in
tight, it will come down mostly on deck. This has worked quite well for
us.
|
995.12 | but be careful | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Thu Sep 29 1988 17:54 | 5 |
| re .12:
Oh yes, be sure to use a preventer on the main boom in case your
inexperienced crew decides to try a jibe.
|
995.13 | Go for the Spinlocks | AKOV12::DJOHNSTON | | Mon Oct 03 1988 14:43 | 13 |
| Maybe a racing sailor has a bit of advice here. If you decide to
lead your halyards aft I would recommend the following. Use a seperate
winch for the main and leave the halyard wrapped on it (no stoppers).
Even the main winch should be on the deck, not on the mast. The
blocks should also be on well backed padeyes on the deck, not the
mast. As for genny halyards I would recommend one winch and stoppers.
Go for the Lewmar Spinlock brand. They are easily released under
extreme load and will not chew up your lines. They are not cheap,
but well worth it. Remember to back these up as well as you would
a winch carrying the same load!
Dave
|
995.14 | Second the motion for Spinlock | CDR::SPENCER | John Spencer | Mon Oct 03 1988 15:10 | 22 |
| RE: -.1,
>>> The blocks should also be on well backed padeyes on the deck,
>>> not the mast.
For some vessels, it's important to check the deck construction around the
mast -- not all can take the high local uploads this may generate. For
them, a mast-mounted cheekblock may have to suffice, as it's sometimes
easier to make strong enough than deck mounting.
>>> Go for the Lewmar Spinlock brand.
I second that, based upon my limited comparative experience on Alan's
Valiant and on a Condor 40 with many Spinlocks. My favorite features of
the Spinlocks are the ease with which they release under load (while
keeping your fingers, sometimes gloved, well away from the line under
strain), and the positive open position you can set so they won't close
and grab unintentionally. Of course, for optimum results, always use
non-kinking halyards, too. ;-),
J.
|
995.15 | your reason(s)? | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Oct 03 1988 15:14 | 4 |
| Why, if one isn't racing, shouldn't one use multiple stoppers and a
single winch for all halyards? After all, a Spinlock lists for $70 and a
winch for $200 to $500.
|
995.16 | Seperate main winch | AKOV12::DJOHNSTON | | Mon Oct 03 1988 16:03 | 14 |
| RE.15 I believe that a mainsail should be on a winch for several
reasons. First, I'm surprised a cruiser type would trust a stopper
for such an essential job as keeping the main up. I wouldn't.
When we re configured our deck layout we got rid of four winches
and rreplaced them with stoppers. Tremendous weight savings. BTW,
those winches are Barients and are for sale at very attractive prices.
However, we still opted for the main on a winch. Secondly, with
a guy at the mast to reef, it helps to have the main halyard right
there so he can do the whole job from there. Third, halyard tension
on the main should be changed to meet conditions and it is easist
if the line is on the drum full time.
Dave
|
995.17 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Mon Oct 03 1988 16:26 | 16 |
| re -.1:
Our stoppers are the old fashioned won't release under load Schaefers.
$40 discount. They slip virtually not at all when taking the load from
the winch, cause no line wear at all, and have kept all our sails up for
nine years with nary a slip. I could hardly ask for better reliability
than that. The big drawback is that the halyard has to be retensioned on
a winch before the stopper will release.
As for retensioning: Yes, it is more awkward than leaving the halyard on
a winch, but as a lazy cruising type I only readjust the halyard tension
for big changes in wind speed, which is one of the reasons my boat is
slow, right?
:-)
|
995.18 | My way | CAMELS::MCGARRY | | Mon Oct 03 1988 18:05 | 59 |
|
In owning your own boat, you get to set it up the
way you feel comfortable with. I own an O'Day 272 and
it came with reefer rolling, for the genny. The main
sheet and main haylard are both run through a multi-line
cheek block (3) to a three gang sheet stopper to a winch
on the starboard cabin housing. They are standard
equipment with the boat.
What I added was a red colored line that runs from a second
reef point I had added to the main sail down through the first
reef point on the main sail through a turning block located at
the base of the mast through the starboard cheek block in through
the sheet stopper. The main haylard is white, main sheet is
blue, and the reef line is red. They are wrapped up and held
on the cabin bulkhead by a teak 3"x6" board with buggie cords.
I added the same configuration to the port side with a red
reefing line attached the end of the boom and first reef
point run back to the cockpit. I ran the vang through a
turning block, back through the cheek block and three gang
sheet stoppers to another winch added to the port side. I also
ran the topping lift aft the same way. The reef line is red,
the vang is green, and the topping lift is white. They are held
by buggie cords also.
The last thing I had done was to modify the main sail with
full battens and a lazy jack system. When I go to lower the
main sail I stand in front of the starboard cabin bulkhead
and let the white main halyard out while pulling in on the
red reefing line that is attached to the second reef point.
This way the main folds down nicely and is close to 50% down
before going up to the mast to pull the rest of it down. In
having to reef under heavy weather I have found that I do
not have to go on deck at all, everything is done from the
cockpit.
In the main reef points, I keep 2' of line through the
reef points all the time, so tie down of the main is easy
and I am not looking for extra lines all the time.
I have found this setup works well for a new crew (color
lines) and for just my self. The reefer rolling is done
from the cockpit, reefing is done there also. I have found
the full battens to work great and the lazy jack system
to work excellence in rough weather. I made one mistake
which I'll will correct on my next boat.
When I installed the lazy jack system, I put the tie down
clet on the boom up near the mast, this means if you have
to adjust the lines at all you have to go forward. The next
time I'll put on the stern end of the boom. All in all
I feel comfortable with this set up, hope it helps.
richard
|
995.19 | Roll your own, and the crew's | CDR::SPENCER | John Spencer | Tue Oct 04 1988 09:31 | 9 |
| RE: .18,
>>> I own an O'Day 272 and it came with reefer rolling....
Usually one finds this feature only on the Acapulco Gold 36.
Didn't Jimmy Buffett sail one of those, long ago...?
;-), J.
|
995.20 | Share a winch | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Wed Oct 05 1988 22:42 | 14 |
| I don't see any reason to keep the main halyard on a winch. On the
New York 36 I race the main halyard shares a winch with the
starboard wing (spinaker) halyard. Since we don't like to rely on
stoppers for the main halyard, it goes from the stopper to an old
fashioned cleat. That way, if the stopper fails, the main will
drop 6 inches or so. Enough to foul up the sail shape, but not
enough to do real damage.
Since the winch is next to the line, it's quite easy to adjust,
but we tend to adjust the cunningham first, so we only adjust the
main halyard once or twice on a typical leg.
--David
|
995.21 | Keep the winch | AKOV12::DJOHNSTON | | Thu Oct 06 1988 10:07 | 19 |
| Right, the cleat will work just fine, especially for a cruiser.
And as Alan said, a lot cheaper! For racing, I still disagree.
If your main is sharing a winch with any other halyard, topping
lift, outhaul etc., you will be less likely to adjust it when needed.
The example that comes to mind is right before the leeward mark
when the main needs to be retensioned (having been eased way down
at the windward mark) at the same time as the jib needs to go back
up, outhaul needs to be put back in, and the person flying the chute
calls for the pole to be raised to help keep the chute full into
the rounding. If the main is sharing all that you will end up with
a very busy pit man or a main that looks like doo doo going into
the windward leg.
The other time is when the main needs to be eased down. It needs
to go onto a winch before that can happen, too. Can't do that from
a stopper. Cunninghams are nice, but can only adjust so far.
Dave
|
995.22 | Stopper failure not the problem | BTO::HICKSON_B | | Thu Oct 06 1988 23:41 | 12 |
| I agree with the reliability of sheet stoppers. Good quality stoppers
correctly installed would be very reliable. I would worry more
about someone inadvertently releasing the main halyard, especially
on one of the stoppers which can be released under tension. As usual,
human error is the greatest danger. If you do use a stopper for
the main make sure you go overboard in labeling it. I've seen the
wrong halyard released a number of times. This isn't a disaster
usually but dropping the main to the deck unexpectedly could be
nasty.
Bill
|
995.23 | Partially rigged do it in the cockpit! | HSK01::MITTS | H�kan Mitts, NET/SWAS/Finland | Mon Oct 10 1988 08:43 | 28 |
|
I sail a partial rigged 31-footer and have all lines coming into the
cockpit. Reasons go like this :
- partial rigged boats need quite a lot of tending to the main, of
the lines coming from the mast half are used for main tuning.
To comfortably do that, there are two winches on the cabin roof.
- as the winches are there, you might as well use them. When they
come to the cokcpit, the person tending the tiller (we sail a
twosome most of the time) can lower the sails, while the other goes
up front and "collects". This means we do use stoppers for the
lines (wish we had Spinlocks, Easylocks chafe the lines!)
- things like reefing that require somebody to go to the mast are
just about as easy to do with the lines three feet away on the cabin
roof as if they were sitting on the mast.
- we get away with for winches all in all at the moment, but would
like to get two more for spin-sheets and "what-do-you-call-those
wires-going-back-from-the-mast-where-the-forestay-is-and-that-
are-used-to-bend-the-mast-and-tighten-the-forestay?"
- if we were racing we'd only fit about three people in the cockpit
anyway, so we'd all be very busy as is.
H�kan
|
995.24 | Leading halyards aft | MCS873::KALINOWSKI | | Mon Nov 14 1994 16:40 | 70 |
|
In looking over my winter job list, there is 1 task I see no
discussions on in this notes file. That being the running of lines into
the cockpit.
My mast has only the jib and main halyards that cleat at the mast.
So does the downhaul. All are external. Although this is fairly clean
for racing, it makes single-handing a lot more work. I do a lot of
lone-sailing, so being able to douse the genoa and start to lower the
main while still in the cockpit appeals to me. I intend on scrapping
the wire/rope halyards for all rope halyards in the process.
I am looking at getting one of those base plates that Defender
sells that attaches around the mast and attaching my blocks to this.
All 3 lines will go to the port side, route through a 3 line deck
organizer and then to a triple 3/8" stopper before a lewmar winch.
Some of the questions I have include:
1. The the mast base, am i better off to use one of those plates, or
mounting plates? In either case, I will through bolt.
2. Can the line organizers be mounted higher using shims, for do they
need to be on the deck. My concern is having clearance for the sliding
deck hatch while under load. Or would it be better to use 3 blocks on
spring mounts? I am trying to keep clutter to a minimum as I intend to
continue to race next year, and people will be moving on deck after
dark at times.
3. I intend to use standard sheeve blocks as I don't see a need for
ball bearings. I am trying to set this up with 90 degrees being the
maximum turn at any point. Any advice or pointers on how to set these
up? I have been looking at boats at docks, but usually lines running
aft is not available on anything less than 30 foot.
4. How far from the stopper should the winch be mounted ? How far to
the outside of the hatch should it be mounted?
5. How large of a backing plate should I be using for each peice of
gear? The cabin top is solid fibreglas (ie no coring). Would those
backing plates the size of the mounting plates do the job? I figure
the load to be less then 2000 lbs, at which point I would expect the
line to part first.
6. Should I remove the mast cleats/winch, or leave them there for backups.
Anyone have problems leaving them there before?
7. How close should I mount the turning blocks off the mast. I am a bit
concerned with:
a: being so close the 2 external halyards wrap around the steaming
light or each other.
b: the mast is step mounted. Consequently, down below is a hugh steel
beam taking the load --- that could get into the way if I get
too close. | |
8. Can I expect the effort to retighten the halyards to be easier with
this setup?
9. The sheeves are for wire/rope. Should I change to all rope or can I
leave them alone as long as I use a non-kelvar line.
10. How much longer should the lines be. I am expecting to add 5-8 feet
to each line to allow for swapping/reattaching the snap shackles.
Thanks for any insight you might have.
Regards
john
|
995.26 | Wow! so many decisions to make... | MUZICK::THOMPSON | Mike LMO2-1/M13 | Tue Nov 15 1994 12:05 | 10 |
|
...invite a yard to make you an offer for
the work and have them sell their ideas to you.
Pick their brains.
I would expect that they would do the work very quickly
and so the offer might be substantially a price
for the hardware.
Mike
|
995.25 | | UNIFIX::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Nov 15 1994 13:36 | 61 |
| [reformatted to correct line length -- The Moderator]
<<< UNIFIX::DISK$AUX_SYSTEM:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SAILING.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SAILING >-
================================================================================
Note 995.25 Sailhandling from the cockpit 25 of 26
PCBUOA::MWEBER "The wind is free. Use it." 48 lines 15-NOV-1994 11:56
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John, you and I think alike (even bought similar boats :-) ). I, too, am
looking at running my lines aft. Presently, I have only one winch on the
mast for the jib halyard -- I haul the main by hand and tighten it with
the Cunningham (not a good solution because the main weighs as much as I
do).
Halyards will be run inside the mast (I have dual sheaves at the mast
head so running over only one will take care of things at the mast head)
and exit at the base of the mast. (Sailing back from P'town in stiff
wind I lost the jib halyard to the breeze -- what a mess!) I will have
two winches on the cabin top where they can be reached easily from the
cockpit. Lines will run through deck organizers and through stoppers
before reaching the winch. Blocks to redirect lines to the deck
organizers (for, say, the vang) will be throughbolted to the cabintop
with backing plates.
Left winch Jib halyard Spinaker halyard (which I use as a spare
jib halyard 'cause I don't have a spinaker)
Right winch Main halyard Vang Downhaul
Right now, I'm undecided as to using all rope or wire and rope halyards.
Too, I'm undecided as to leaving the cleats on the mast or taking them
off after all is done. I'm also looking for a way to simplify my jiffy
reefing lines.
Your questions: >> Can the line organizers be mounted higher using shims
... having >> clearance for the sliding deck hatch while under load On
my Catalina I will be mounting the organizer a little forward of the
mast so the lines can go around the hatch. I keep my feet pretty clost
to the deck and wouldn't want to trip over a high line in the dark.
>> How far from the stopper should the winch be mounted ? I will be
allowing enough space between the stopper and the winch for someone to
step between. This will certainly be enough for any set of hands and
will prevent twisted ankles.
>> How large of a backing plate should I be using for each peice of >>
gear? The cabin top is solid fibreglas (ie no coring). The size of the
backing plate should be commensurate with the load placed on it and the
material it is attached to. I err on the safe side almost always making
mine 'too big'. Consider a single large backing plate for all of your
throughbolted blocks. On my Catalina, I have a structure that resembles
a roll-bar on a Jeep to take lateral loads on the mast. A big
determanite is how thick is the fiberglass where you will be
throughbolting.
Much of this advice comes from the rigger who is helping me on
"Latitude".
Michael "Latitude"
|
995.27 | The plan starts to formulate.... | MCS873::KALINOWSKI | | Tue Nov 15 1994 14:13 | 50 |
| Thanks Alan. I looked under aft and halyard, but didn't find a thing.
Honest!!!
This note has some interesting comments in it.
Re .25 Yup Mike, it is getting scarry. You ought to think about rac'n
next year. There are LOTS of boats like ours out there on a thursday
evening.
I am trying to keep it to the port side for 2 reason.
1. Cleaner cabin top. Sheets only on 1 side, and it is the opposite of
the reefing hook and reefing lines, so there is less to trip over.
2. The compass is mounted on the starboard side. I don't let anything
get near it, much less the mass of a winch.
I am going with rope halyards just to forsake the meathooks. I really
hate getting salt water in cuts. I can also end for end them when they
wear a bit.
I will look this weekend to see how far forward I can place the line
organizers and if it will miss the hatch. Push come to shove, it
probably really doesn't matter if I can't get the last 3-6 inches of
the hatch slid open while I am under sail.
re .25 Good idea, but there are a few problems with me trying to have
the yard look at it.
1. The boat came home last week. It is 50 miles to the ocean, so there
are not too many marinas around. Cost for their time to quote me will
be expensive. Guess I should have asked this question a couple of weeks
ago while she was bobbing at the marina.
2. The labor will be up there because of the need to remove/reinstall
the headliner. This is an old boat with a cloth headline with lots of
little teak strips attaching it. For me, it's idiot work.
3. I already have the winch and stopper. I got them at a great price
used at a Marine Exchange end of season "get this stuff outta here" sale.
The most expensive part of this whole setup will be the new halyards at
80% of the total cost. As you can see, it is doubtful "Erna Ann" will be
using Harken Airblocks as part of the rigging.
Keep those ideas coming folks. I was on a Sabre 32 this year where
everything but the anchor line came to 2 sets of stopper/winches. A
little overkill for me.
john
|
995.28 | my 2 cents worth | PLUTO::ARLINGTON | | Sun Dec 11 1994 23:19 | 26 |
| John,
I dont know the boat you sail but some general comments.
On racing boats here in NZ halyards are generally led
aft to the starboard side as most mark roundings are to port
and staying on the weather side is always a nice idea, from
a performance point of view and the crew generally find it
easier to work. This assumes that Gybe sets are rare at the
top mark.
Swapping to all rope is a really good idea - Kevlar or spectra
should be used on a racing boat to minimize stretch.
You do not mention the spinnacker halyard, but a having a jammer
on the mast for this eases the job on hoists at the mark,
the slack can be taken up later. Topping lift and downhaul come
aft.
Having jammers at the mast on any other line would complicate the
issue.
On all the boats that I sail, all lines lead to the cockpit.
my 2c worth
Cheers
revel
|
995.29 | NZ way | NZOV02::DUKE | | Tue Dec 13 1994 18:05 | 21 |
| Hi,
I hardly ever agree with Revel but this time I have too :)
As he says in NZ its common to have the set up he mentioned. I have
added to mine a system for the outhaul, cunningham and vang so I can get
at them from both sides. It makes life easy for the crew and keeping the
crew weight in the right place.
The topping lift is not done this way as I don't really ever use a
downhaul because have I put tweakers on the kite sheets on each side. This
allows for easy fine adjustment of the pole height rather simply. The
tweakers have a carefully positioned knot so that the pole can't fly.
I had for a while the problem of someone letting the main come down so
actually moved it to the other port side. That way the onlt halyards
that get let off under race conditions are the jib and kite ones.
My way (not the right way)
|
995.30 | Halyards to the cockpit | TOLKIN::HILL | | Fri Jan 13 1995 12:50 | 34 |
| I have all of my halyards and reefing lines cming back to my cockpit
on my Morris 36.
Regarding your questions. I tried to get as much distance between the
stopper and the winch as possible. This makes the lines lead better
when under pressure.
Concerning the backing plates - My winch plates were maybe a 1/2"
bigger in diameter than the actual winch. The turning block on the
deck was also about the same size as the actual block itsself. ( I used
schaffer line organizers both single and double level). I suggest you
ask John or Kevin at Marine exchange for their opinion.
I would leave the winches and cleats on the mast unless you cannot
lead the lines away from them.
Another issue you might not have to deal with is halyard force on the
deck. If your mast is deck stepped, no problem. If your mast is through
the deck then you have to stop the deck from lifting from the force
of the halyards. Basically I tied the deck to the mast with a
turnbuckle which was mounted below deck.
Another problem is controlling the halyards while you are lowering the
sails. Mine always seemed to jam unless they were lead straight aft
from the stopper and no kinks were allowed to occur.
Anyways leading halyards, outhauls,reefing lines, cunninghams, and
downhauls back to the cockpit makes life easier for the short handed
skipper, (I always have to do the heavy work when just my wife and I
are sailing), but it is tough for a non-sailing guest sitting forward
in the ockpit.
One other benefit, a tight halyard makes a great jackline on the cabin
top when tying in reef points.
|