T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
795.1 | Go Solar !! | TUNER::THUET | | Fri Apr 15 1988 15:02 | 5 |
| Why don't you consider solar panels ????
Bob Thuet
|
795.2 | batteries for ballast? | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Fri Apr 15 1988 15:03 | 49 |
| Never fearing to be opinionated .....
First, I'd suggest a masthead tricolor light for sailing at night. Most
units use a 25W (2A) bulb and are much more visible than the usual deck
level lights. A tricolor will both reduce electrical consumption and
increase your safety.
Next, the amount of current you are using is really quite substantial
(even for a larger boat with an inboard engine), and I would suggest
finding some way to reduce that consumption. If you are 10 miles
offshore, you don't really need to have your loran on continuously. You
could turn your VHF on only when you see another boat. (If you don't see
them, then they probably don't see you.)
While a small gasoline generator will certainly keep your batteries
charged, do you really want to listen to a generator running many hours
a day? The quiet of sailing is one of the joys of sailing (for us).
How about (yes, all expensive):
An outboard engine with an alternator?
A third battery?
Solar panels?
A towed water-driven generator?
My guess is that a standard generator will not be terribly reliable in
the marine environment. One other worry (besides the gasoline): I'd be
reluctant to have 110VAC running around my boat at sea. Unless the
wiring and grounds are done right and everything is kept dry, this could
be quite dangerous.
Assuming you use a 400W generator and a 110VAC battery charger and
assuming an overall efficiency of 75%, you could expect a battery
charging current of perhaps 25A. Since battery charging is less than
100% efficient, you will have to run the generator at least 4 hours per
day to keep your batteries charged.
Sophisticated marine battery charging systems are capable of 100A of
charging current. Much of what I have read about marine electrical
systems would suggest that your battery capacity is marginal at best,
even with an inboard engine for charging.
You have an interesting problem.
Alan
|
795.3 | Some More thoughts | SALEM::MCWILLIAMS | | Fri Apr 15 1988 17:01 | 75 |
| Re: .1 Solar Panels
The problem with solar panels is that they need light to operate, and
my peak power drain is running through the night when solar panels
would be fairly inefficient :^)
In addition solar panels for re-charging batteries during the day are
no easy answer either. A 42 watt ARCO panel (at a cost of $369 at West
Marine) only delivers 15-25 ampere hours/day or one third of my night
time consumption. For this it consumes 42.5" x 13" of deck space or 4
square feet. The write up in Practical Sailor called into question
their durability/reliability. For topping off the batteries solar is
probably a good idea, and maybe daytime operation.
On a boat outfitted for long distance cruising, I would have a wind
vane, not an electrical based steering, and VHF would not be an
issue, then my consumption during the night could be offset by the
charging from the day.
Re: .2
Alan;
Yep a tri-color would reduce the light draw from 2.7 amps to about 2
amps for a saving of 7-8 ampere hours. It's a good idea but a lot of
time when we run distance at night we have to resort to the iron jib.
Under those circumstances we have to use the deck mounted running
lights and a steaming light. Again not having generation on the
motor, when we motor we are still a net consumer of power unlike
the in-board engine case where you output would probably cover the
power drain.
As far as reducing the power drain, we could run with less, but the
biggest offender, the Autohelm, still needs to be run for long periods
with short crew (and a 1st mate who can't stay awake at night very
well). VHF could be turned off, LORAN only used for spot checks,
instruments turned off, Autohelm used sparingly which could probably
result in a lower power drain. We've made the trip back from
Provincetown to Newburyport during the day with only half a battery
drained.
The costs for an outboard with generator run about $1500 (new) and
$1000 used.
Third battery only increases our capacity but still doesn't give
us generation capability. (We are probably adding a third battery
anyway).
Solar panels as related above would cost about $750 and consume
8 square feet of deck space to give me 30-50 ampere hours.
The safety is probably not too bad. I would connect directly from the
generator to the boat's electrical system, and the generator is fused
with a GFCI. Of course one wouldn't use it in foul weather because that
would be begging for a disaster.
The smallest generator they make is a 500 watt model, with little
difference in price up to a 1 KW model since the engine sizes are are
about the same. Figure about $300-$450.
As far as battery capacity we are using two 105 amp hour batteries
(Group 29) which is bigger than the normal size (Group 26 - 85 amp hour
battery that they usually build battery boxes for. The only thing we
could do is go to the largest size of commercial batteries they have
(Group 32 - 120 amp hour) or start wiring things in series.
As far as the noise at night, I agree it is a pain and a detractor to
the serenity of the night sail, sitting there watching the
phosphoresence of the wake, but this great high tech gadgetry must
be fed.
/jim
|
795.4 | | SMURF::ROBINSON | | Mon Apr 18 1988 10:30 | 6 |
|
I've seen boats with shroud-mounted (or spreader mounted? I didn't
see it too close) windvane generators. Does anyone have experience
with or thoughts about these?
|
795.5 | Tenaka portable generator | SPCTRM::BURR | | Tue Apr 19 1988 15:50 | 18 |
| Last year I bought a small Tenaka generator from Boat US. This
unit is tiny (about 14" x 6" x 6") and produces 20 amps 12VDC.
The motor looks and sound like a well muffled small chainsaw engine.
The unit cost about $250. It DOES NOT product 110VAC. When I use
it, I just hook it up to the charging circuit on the DC side of
my consta-volt.
I bought the unit because I often cruise off shore and was worried
what would happen if my main engine bought the ranch on a passage.
As my boat was working under sail and consequently leaking when
worked hard (fixed now), I was concerned about having power for
lights, instruments and pumps (mostly pumps). The unit does certainly
shatter the quiet of the night and does have to be set up on deck,
however, it is not too noisy and is a nice saftey measure. BTW,
it burns only 4oz of 1:50 gasoline/oil mixture per hour.
|
795.6 | | MTBLUE::BELTON_TRAVI | Travis Belton | Tue Apr 19 1988 16:19 | 15 |
| Jim,
The ideal would be an outboard with generator built in, since then
whenever you've got the motor on, you're charging. (No way do you
want to listen to the o/b AND a generator while heading across Mass
Bay at night.)
So, have you considered the amount you could sell your present o/b
for against the cost of a used one w/generator? It might only be
a little more than the cost of a new generator (well, a few hundred
dollars is a little to us nautical types), and could be a lot more
useful depending on the usage of your boat and motor.
Travis
|
795.7 | | AIMHI::STOWELL | | Tue Apr 19 1988 17:44 | 12 |
| Don't know what you requirements are for engine size, but many times
you will find something like this in the Want Advertiser magazine.
There is a section in there on boat equiptment, and often times
you can find someone that just want to get rid of their engine,
or someone that bought a new one. A couple of years ago I bought
an Avon Dingy and Motor at about 20% of the price of a new one.
If you give me your requirements, I'll look to see what is avail.
Bob
264-8376
|
795.8 | Retrofit outboard | CSSE::COUTURE | Abandon shore | Wed Apr 20 1988 10:01 | 4 |
| Have you checked into retrofitting your outboard with a high-amperage
alternator? I know for a fact that OMC has them available for
outboards of 8 h.p. and up.
|
795.9 | belting the main? | GORP::MARCOTTE | George Marcotte SWS Santa Clara | Mon Apr 25 1988 13:18 | 6 |
| what about belting a generator off the main engine? If it was setup
so you can connect/disconnect it quickly you could use main engine
for creating electricity or motion in dead air (not both). the
alternators that come with the main engines take too long to charge
the batteries. They are not designed to put a load on the engine.
|
795.10 | About Outboard Generators | SALEM::MCWILLIAMS | | Tue May 31 1988 13:56 | 10 |
| Due to other reasons, we ended up buying a new Evinrude Sailmaster
9.9 with electric start and a generator.
The interesting thing is that the generator only provides about 4 amps
which again really isn't enough to recharge a battery (i.e. 50% of a
105 amp hour battery @ 90% charging efficency would take 15 hours).
So it looks like we may still think good thoughts about a generator.
/jim
|
795.11 | 13 amps vs 4 amps | ECADSR::FINNERTY | | Tue May 31 1988 15:39 | 10 |
|
fyi, our Yamaha 9.9 puts out 13 amps, if I remember correctly.
It is also a 4-stroke and very quiet, although substantially
larger and heavier than some of the Evinrude models, in particular
the 'Yachtman', which appears much smaller and lighter (or was
that a Johnson?)
-Jim-->
|
795.12 | | MENTOR::REG | Endorphins are MY recreational drugs | Wed Jun 01 1988 15:28 | 8 |
|
As a matter of curiosity; What do tow behind generators typically
cost ? How does this compare to the alternatives on a dollars
per watt basis ?
Reg
|