T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
534.1 | lobster snuffing without guilt | PSTJTT::TABER | D'ye nae ken the wunda owit? | Mon Mar 02 1987 09:59 | 11 |
| > (I personally can't split the lobster live. I fill a large pot
> with water and wait for it to come to a full bubbling boil. Then
> put the lobster in head first. I cook it for about two minutes
> or until I'm sure it's dead.
If you want to do it even easier, just put the live lobsters in the
kitchen sink, and run luke warm tap water into it. The lobsters can't
live at even these moderate temperatures, but they don't thrash or give
any other indication that they are having discomfort on the way out. As
the water covers them, they just slowly stop moving. In a few minutes,
you can haul them out and do whatever.
|
534.3 | Don't let them suffer! | AKOV05::GALVIN | ALPHA.......works for me | Tue Mar 03 1987 08:10 | 13 |
|
I just read in a cook book that the best and fastest way to kill
a lobster is to hold tdhe lobster right side up on a cutting surface.
Using the tip of a sharp knife, pierce the lobster at the point
where the tail and body join. This severs the spinal cord, killing
the lobster instantly. The second best is to put them head first
into a pot of **boiling** water as fast as you can so they won't
suffer. I certainly wouldn't want a slow painful death like
suffocate in lukewarm water.
Hugs,
Fran
|
534.7 | A Question of Philosophy | ASHBY::HARRIS | | Fri Mar 13 1987 10:01 | 25 |
| The dilemma of how to eat any kind of meat/poultry/fish without
feeling barbaric seems to be running rampant in today's society.
Any reminder that your dinner was one 'on the hoof' (or 'on the
pedal extremity' if you prefer) is considered distasteful and,
in part, must account for the ever increasing number of vegetarians
one encounters. However, as the authors of _COOKING_ (the art of
using appliances and utensils to convert ingredients and seasonings
into excuses and apologies) have pointed out in their entry on
Lobster, it is merely a question of philosophy:
Lobster: Everyone loves these delectable crustaceans, but many
cooks are squeamish about placing them into boiling water
alive, which is the only proper method of preparing them.
Frankly, the easiest way to eliminate your guilt is to
establish theirs by putting them on trial before they're
cooked. The fact is, lobsters are among the most ferocious
predators on the sea floor, and you're helping reduce crime
in the reefs. Grasp the lobster behind the head, look it right
in its unmistakably guilty eyestalks and say, "Where were
you on the night if the 21st?", then flourish a picture of a
scallop or a sole and shout, "Perhaps this will refresh that
crude neural apparatus you call a memory!" The lobster will
squirm noticeably. It may even take a swipe at you with one
of its claws. Incorrigible. Pop it into the pot. Justice has
been served, and shortly you and your friends will be, too.
|
534.29 | In wartime, it would be called an atrocity | BOXTOP::JANCOURTZ | | Mon Aug 01 1988 15:11 | 10 |
| Yes, you can--you have to thoroughly crack each claw and body segment,
though, to make sure that the steam can escape and the lobster doesn't
blow up.
But on strictly humanitarian grounds, have some pity for the poor
lobster. Dropping him into boiling water kills him almost instantly
(at least the shock knocks him out). Getting one's claws (and every
claw joint) cracked, one's chest and abdomen savaged, and then getting
microwaved has got to be excruciating. Boil the poor bugger. Please.
|
534.20 | Trying this again!! | CSSE32::BELLETETE | the Duke makes me Puke | Mon Aug 01 1988 16:59 | 13 |
| < Note 1301.2 by CSSE32::BELLETETE "the Duke makes me Puke" >
-< There are other ways... >-
Why is it that I soemtimes write in a reply and then it doesn't get
put into notes.....I can't understand why this happens...
Anyway, you can instantly kill the lobster by inserting a sharp knife
into the area between the body and the tail on the backside of the
lobster. Until I found this method I used to have a pretty hard time
bake stuffing my lobsters. Some of them would put up quite a struggle
when I was cutting them up the middle. I find this method to be
very effective. Just be sure that you do it just before you put them in
the microwave. Don't let them hang around dead and uncooked for a long time.....
|
534.21 | This is ill | VIA::GLANTZ | Just a bag of quarks & leptons | Tue Aug 02 1988 10:25 | 7 |
| Somewhere, we found a recipe which claimed that the best way to make
boiled lobster is to start the live lobster in cold water. I'm not
kidding, it really said this. What's even sicker, I'm ashamed to
admit, was that we tried it. The lobster did NOT taste better. I have
no further comment.
- Mike
|
534.22 | Pith your lobsters | HOONOO::PESENTI | JP | Tue Aug 02 1988 14:00 | 12 |
| I we were supposed to be kind to lobsters, they'd be less ugly and less
delicious!
But before I get lots of hate mail from the ASPCL, I believe they deserve as
quick and painless a death as possible. Severing the main nerve by inserting
a knife between the body and tail is about as quick as it gets. It is said to
kill the animal instantly. It is called pithing, and it is how cattle are
(were?) killed, not to mention my high school biology frog.
- JP
|
534.23 | Pith at your own peril... | FGVAXZ::RITZ | Caught in the Devil's bargain | Thu Aug 04 1988 15:20 | 17 |
| Re: pithing lobsters
Julia Child has a couple of pages dedicated to the subject in
_Julia Child's Kitchen_, where she says that severing the main nerve
may dump the contents of the stomach sac and intestine into the tail,
and is not recommended. Besides, they don't die immediately, they just
stop moving. She cites marine biologists who say that throwing them
into boiling water is more humane, as they are dead long before the
muscles stop moving (i.e., nearly immediately.)
BTW, she spells it 'tomalley.' So does Legal Seafoods. I agree
with what's been said about livers in general - don't eat them
regularly, as they are loaded with toxins. Moreover, most animals
don't have gall bladders - the liver serves the function of gall
storage, increasing the concentrations.
JJRitz
|
534.28 | Microwaving Lobster | ULTRA::CASEY | | Tue Aug 09 1988 17:31 | 6 |
| I have an Amana Microwave oven, I ordered a steamer thru the Raytheon
Company, have relatives that work there. Yes, you may cook
not only a lobster in it, you do not have to kill it first,
but you may also do an entire clambake in it. Tastes great.
|
534.24 | humane lobster treatment | NEBVAX::BEAUVAIS | | Wed Aug 10 1988 13:24 | 9 |
| Re: humane lobster treatment
I attended a professional cooking school in Cambridge several years
ago and my instructor had an unusual way of handling the situation.
She massaged the lobster until it appeared to be paralyzed. If
you stood it on the table on end, it wouldn't wiggle around. She
then proceeded to sever the nerve with the knife. As many of her
recipes called for sauteeing the lobster pieces while uncooked,
boiling was not possible. She felt this method was most humane.
It was somewhat like lulling the creature to sleep.
|
534.25 | massage hypnosis for lobsters | VIA::GLANTZ | Just a bag of quarks & leptons | Wed Aug 10 1988 13:57 | 10 |
| My wife also attended that program, and, by golly, this method really
does hypnotize the beasties. Whether it's more humane than other
methods, from the point of view of the lobser, is hard to say, but at
least it's easier on OUR consciences, since the thing isn't squirming
around when you deliver the coup de grace.
My wife hasn't prepared any of those dishes since completing the
program.
- Mike
|
534.26 | drunken lobsters | BUNYIP::QUODLING | Anything! Just play it loud! | Sat Sep 10 1988 06:09 | 8 |
| We used to get Lobsters drunk before we killed them (A bottle
of cheap red wine into the tub the were swimming in.)
This was taught to me by a Marine Biologist, who also fed cows
several beers before slaughtering them on his farm...
q
|
534.11 | boiling is easier | WFOVX5::KEYWORTH | | Fri Mar 02 1990 11:36 | 6 |
| It seems like it would be much easier to steam a couple of lobsters
over a couple quarts of boiling water. Not only does it kill the
lobster instantly but you could reduce the liquid to use as a stock
for your sauce.
John
|
534.12 | steaming is gentler | MSBIS1::MEDVECKY | | Fri Mar 02 1990 12:20 | 6 |
| I agree with .3.....take it a step further....take all the meat out
of the cooked lobster and out of all the shells, add more water and
make lobster stock (Julia Child has this in one of her books) with
whatever seasoning you like....
Rick
|
534.14 | ok, fast not instant | WFOVX5::KEYWORTH | | Mon Mar 05 1990 16:35 | 12 |
| Sorry, perhaps instantly was the wrong choice of words. The object
is to have the water so hot that the killing time is reduced as
much as possible. I don't believe that a lobster suffers for more
than a second or two if put in a covered pot of shallow water (a
couple of inches) at a full rolling boil. The water is at 212 deg.
and the steam is going to be hotter than that. I believe the shock
of going from a 40 deg. frig. to 212+ deg. would be enough to kill
anything in a relatively short period of time. Of course you could
kill them instantly with hammer if you knew where the brain was
and could be sure that you hit it the first time. I think I'll stick
with the water method. It's a sure kill, less messy and you can
use the water for stock afterward.
|
534.15 | steam vs. boil | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Tue Mar 06 1990 11:13 | 7 |
| In re: steam
The steam will not be hotter than 212 degrees, unless pressurized. In
any case, what counts is that the thermal transfer rate from steam to
crustacean will be substantially slower than that from water of
comparable temperature. Thus the demise will be correspondingly
slowed.
|
534.16 | they look like insects to me... | MARX::TSOI | living in chaos | Tue Mar 06 1990 16:23 | 10 |
| I think there are notes somewhere in this notesfile that deal with how
to kill a lobster (what's more merciful, etc). It's quite humorous.
My dad used to chop a lobster up into pieces while they are alive and
squirming. And quickly stir-fry them. I didn't think it was gross
until I tried to boil a live lobster. I don't think I will repeat
that performance in a while. Luckily Market Basket will steam lobsters,
so if I ever wanted one, at least I won't be the instrument of death...
-Stella
|
534.17 | Why is it? | HYDRA::R_CARROLL | | Mon Mar 12 1990 11:55 | 8 |
|
RE: .10
Whether or you you do the actual killing is beside the point, YOU are
still the reason for the lobster dying. Why is it that people cannot
accept the fact that something, be it animal or plant, must die for
them to survive? Nothing is born plastic wrapped.
Bob
|
534.19 | | BUNYIP::QUODLING | Gimme a Mail Jeep, and I'm dangerous | Mon Mar 12 1990 15:19 | 12 |
| Having a farm where we grow cows and crayfish, (Yes, really -
about 100 head of cattle and 350-400,000 marron crayfish in South
East Queensland, Australia), one of our popular ways of either
killing a cow or a crayfish is to get them drunk first. Cows love
beer (particularly when spiked with pure alcohol...) and they are
totally relaxed when killed. With the crays, we let them swim for
a few minutes in a tub of cheap red wine, diluted with water. When
their antennae start going all over the place they are ready to
boil...
q
|
534.30 | | BIZNIS::MARINER | | Tue Jul 24 1990 16:27 | 12 |
| I haven't tried this yet myself but plan on it.
My friends put the lobster in one of the oven cooking bags for roasts
(which I have never used either) and zapped it for 5 or 6 minutes, one
lobster at a time. 1 to 1-1/2 pounds.
They got this recipe out of a second cookbook by the author of " The
Microwave Gourmet". Can't think of her name, Barbara something. They
claim it's no worse than boiling one to death. Not messy. I just
can't imagine trying to stuff that lobster into the bag without getting
attack.
|
534.27 | Lobsters: little brain, so there's no pain | MPO::WHITTALL | Charlie Whittall @ MAXCIM Prog. Off. | Mon Feb 11 1991 13:06 | 18 |
|
A perennial problem with sensitive lobster lovers is cooking the tasty
crustaceans without feeling guilty. Many people remember Woody Allen
trying to get the feisty devils into the pot in "Annie Hall." Now,
according to graduate student Michael B. Loughlin and his thesis
adviser, Robert C. Bayer of the University of Maine at Orono's
Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, lobster "... don't have
enough of a brain to express pain." But, if you're still concerned
about the pain issue, Loughlin, a former gunnery and weapons office
on the USS Iwo Jima, recommends keeping the lobster on ice for 15
minutes before dropping it into rolling, boiling water. But the
bottom line is that the tail flips are a brainless reflex to heat and
if there is any real suffering, "it's on the part of the concerned
cooks preparing the meal."
The Boston Globe
2/11/91 Page 47
'Names and Faces'
|
534.31 | Yet another opinion... | ASDG::HARRIS | Brian Harris | Sun Jan 19 1992 12:13 | 31 |
|
'How to Kill a Lobster without a Guilty Conscience'
[Excerpted from _The_Lobster_Almanac_ by Bruce Ballenger]
...Lobster lovers with soft hearts need not dispair, however.
According to Gordon Gunter, former director of the Gulf Coast
Research Laboratory, one method for killing lobsters and other
crustaceans should let you sleep at night. In an article first
published in _Science_ in 1961, Gunter pointed out that most
aquatic invertebrates like the lobster are as sensitive to
relatively low heat as they are to high temperatures. Both are
lethal, but he claims that lobsters put in a pot with water that
is very slowly heated to about 100 degrees Farenheit - which feels
only lukewarm to us - will kill the animals without distress. The
pot can then be brought to a boil to finish the cooking. Large
lobsters can be killed by putting them in a tub of water and
placing it in a sunny part of the house where the water will warm
to the mortal temperature.
This vulnerability to low heat, he says, is well documented,
and though it's impossible to prove scientifically that lobsters
feel absolutely no pain when they succumb in lukewarm water, the
cook doesn't have to have one foot on the lid as in the scalding
method.
"Crustaceans subjected to low heat are certinly not paralyzed,"
Gunter says. "They stir about vigorously if touched, and their
gills work increasingly fast up to the moment of death. There is
no sign of pain or distress, and it is reasonable to assume that
an organism showing such reactions is much less likely to be
distressed than one which goes into a violent spasm.
|
534.32 | | TLE::WINALSKI | Careful with that VAX, Eugene | Fri Jan 31 1992 21:38 | 9 |
| RE: .22 (pithing)
Pithing an animal does NOT kill it (at least, not right away). Pithing merely
destroys the spinal cord (or, in the case of lobsters, major ganglia) so that
the creature is paralyzed. The creature is still alive. This is precisely why
it's done to frogs in Biology classes--vivisection is difficult when the animal
is trying to hop away from you while you're cutting it up.
--PSW
|