T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1396.1 | You might find more info here... | HOONOO::PESENTI | JP | Wed Sep 28 1988 08:18 | 18 |
| Here is a quick list of existing lobster notes (DIR/TITLE=LOBSTER):
28 DREAMS::SIART 6-SEP-1984 0 SHRIMP WITH LOBSTER SAUCE
144 BRAT::PORELL 25-JUN-1985 3 baked stuffed lobster
376 MRMFG1::A_PEIRANO 15-OCT-1986 5 Lobster Bisque???
534 BAGELS::LANE 1-MAR-1987 10 Baked Stuffed Lobsters!!!
690 FRSBEE::GIUNTA 26-AUG-1987 6 Freezing uncooked lobster
1272 RUTLND::HANLEY 18-JUL-1988 3 lobster newburg
1301 SQUEKE::BIGGS 31-JUL-1988 19 Microwave Lobster?
1392 EMASA2::DREIER 26-SEP-1988 0 Wanted-Lobster Casserole
and, by the way, the bigger the lobster, the more meat you get,
proportionally. Most recipes tell you to overcook a large lobster, so most
people will tell you the meat is tough. This is not the case if you cut the
cooking time way down.
- JP
|
1396.2 | Isn't nature wonderful? | CECV03::SADLER | Andy Sadler, BUO/E10, 249-4416 | Wed Sep 28 1988 19:32 | 32 |
|
I haven't cooked enough lobsters to be able to give a ratio, but
my knowledge of the anatomy and life cycle of lobsters (and crabs)
would indicate that this is *not* a constant ratio.
Two of the major reasons:
1. There is an 'overhead' in the construction of the lobster. Some
pieces contain no usable meat, and they are present in all lobsters.
However, these parts represent a smaller fraction of a large lobster
than a small one, so a large lobster will contain a larger proportion
of usable meat than a small one. So I agree with -.1 in general
except that:
2. Lobsters shed their shell from time to time. This happens when
the existing shell, which is rigid and cannot expand, gets 'full'.
At this stage, a new 'soft' shell is formed under the old one and
the old one is shed. The new shell is 'pumped up' with water to
expand it, and then it hardens. The 'pumping up' allows some space
inside the new shell to allow for future growth. The upshot of all
this is that a lobster (or crab) which is just about to shed its
shell will be 'denser' than one which has just shed it ( they will
have the same weight of meat but the second one will be bigger).
So in this one special case the bigger lobster will contain a *smaller*
proportion of meat.
The only real way to gauge the likely contents is to feel the weight!
Andy
|
1396.3 | I don't think there's a constant either | PSTJTT::TABER | Answer hazy -- ask again later | Thu Sep 29 1988 11:03 | 5 |
| The old Yankees also say that lobster varies in density depending on
water temperature. I can't remember which way they say it goes, though
I'd imagine it's shrink when cold, expand when warm (old Yankees think
60� is warm, by the way.)
>>>==>PStJTT
|
1396.4 | the elusive SHEDDERS' meat to shell ratio | CIVIC::WINBERG | | Thu Sep 29 1988 17:00 | 13 |
| The questions you raised are _perfect_ for controversey, because
there _literally_ are almost as many answers as there are lobsters.
As you probably know, lobsters shed their shells frequently throughout
their lifetime. As they reach their maximum size inside the shell,
the ratio of lobster to shell is high (as their edible flesh has
fully filled the shell); at various stages of their development,
their shells are less hard and less well filled out -- at that time,
the ratio is lower.
Because they shed, and because the shell varies in weight/hardness
throughout the growth and shedding process, there's really no reliable
ratio of edible meat to weight.
|
1396.5 | ex | DROO::WEYMOUTH | AI SELECT Business Development Mgr | Fri Sep 30 1988 09:12 | 14 |
| My experience over the years (I grew up doing lobster bakes with
my dad and one of his friends) is that the only reason large lobsters
are tough is that in order to cook the inside of the meat, the outside
is over-cooked.
In general, though, you will find more meat per pound with the ability
to cokk throughout without inconsistent done-ness if you stick to
1 1/2 to 3 1/2 pounders. Those 3 1/2 pounders are still pretty big
mothers, though.
Yes, I am back and editing the cookbook again - maybe I'll be done
sometime in the next 50 years.
Don
|
1396.6 | ah, check that scale | SALEM::MEDVECKY | | Fri Sep 30 1988 14:01 | 12 |
| RE.0.....may I ask WHY these questions are being asked....I mean,
does it REALLY matter if a 1 1/4 lb lobster containes 14.5 or 14.8
ounces of meat?
What I do is this....and Im going to do it tonight....if the lobsters
Im buying (chickens) look on the small side, Ill buy THREE....that
way I know Ill get "enough" to satisfy myself.....
Happy crackin
Rick
|
1396.7 | 2 pounds is perfect for 1 person | MYVAX::LUBY | DTN 287-3204 | Fri Sep 30 1988 17:02 | 8 |
|
I personally find that a 2 pound lobster, with some steamers,
and some tossed salad is enough to satisfy me!! Yes, I can
outeat some of the men that I know but hey! Gotta love high
metabolism!!!!
Karen
|
1396.8 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Sun Nov 27 1988 22:26 | 10 |
| RE: .2
> The only real way to gauge the likely contents is to feel the weight!
But is this likely to be true if you buy a lobster that has just
moulted and his pumped-up shell is partially filled with water?
It sounds like your buying a lot of seawater at lobster prices.
|