T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1117.1 | | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Wed Oct 19 1994 15:05 | 11 |
| The term "[standing] on line" is one I associate with New York; I've
only heard it from New Yorkers of various sorts.
* * * *
One way I've been able to spot non-native-English-speakers is by
their non-standard choice of prepositions. (This can be surprisingly
relevant in the printing conferences. "Are you using A4 paper?"
is one of the basic questions.)
Ann B.
|
1117.2 | | JRDV04::DIAMOND | segmentation fault (california dumped) | Wed Oct 19 1994 18:44 | 13 |
| Prepositions, verb tenses, idioms, etc., do not exactly map from
language to language. The cases which come rather close to matching
seem to cause the most problems for some reason.
Anyway, in Japanese, a device might be "in" or "cut." (That's
the setting of the power switch, not a status of working or not.
Not working is "gone," in the sense of broken, as in "a part
like that could go at any time.")
In many languages, a device is "open" or "closed." "Please open
the light," yeah right, don't you know the vacuum will leak out?
-- Norman Diamond
|
1117.3 | Eh? | AIMHI::TINIUS | It's always something. | Thu Oct 20 1994 06:02 | 9 |
| > In many languages, a device is "open" or "closed." "Please open
> the light," yeah right, don't you know the vacuum will leak out?
My wife, born and raised a Massachussettsian (Burlington, Lexington, Bellerica)
says "open the light" and "shut the light". I had never heard that usage before
I met her two years ago.
??
-stephen
|
1117.4 | Behind of | BARSTR::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Thu Oct 20 1994 06:25 | 4 |
| My wife (grew up in northern Vermont) says "behind OF". It sounds odd to
me, yet there is logic to it, because it is symmetrical with "ahead of".
Clay
|
1117.5 | :-) | WELSWS::HILLN | It's OK, it'll be dark by nightfall | Thu Oct 20 1994 07:03 | 9 |
| Do you mean 'behind of' in the context of, for example, "we cooked a steak
cut from the behind of a cow"?
Nothing wrong with this as a euphemism.
Or is 'behind of' used as an adverb phrase?
Which is not a phrase I have encountered.
|
1117.6 | ... the count is now up to two ... | CPDW::CIUFFINI | God must be a Gemini... | Thu Oct 20 1994 07:19 | 6 |
| re: 1117.3
!! My grandmother ( arrived in the US from Italy in 1912 ) used the
identical phrases of 'open/shut the light'. I had always thought
it was her own interpretation of the Italian to English.
jc
|
1117.7 | | VORTEX::SMURF::BINDER | etsi capularis ego vita fruar | Thu Oct 20 1994 08:03 | 13 |
| Re .4
> "behind OF"
An analog of this, one that grates every time I hear it, is "big of,"
as in "It's not that big of a deal." The "of" is patently wrong. The
sentence can be reformatted as "It's not a deal [that is] that big."
Using the "of" makes "deal" semiotically into a possessive, which is
clearly not intended.
ARRRRGGGGHHHHH!!! :-)
-dick
|
1117.8 | Will that be coarse or fine? | AIMHI::TINIUS | It's always something. | Thu Oct 20 1994 09:40 | 12 |
| Re .7
I don't understand why this is wrong. I would have reformatted the
sentence as "It's not a deal that is one of the big deals". Does your
note mean that it's incorrect to ask "What kind of car do you drive?" or
"What kind of a car do you drive?
But I'll bet my grater is bigger than your grater when I say "I should
of called her".
-stephen
|
1117.9 | | OKFINE::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Thu Oct 20 1994 09:46 | 5 |
| >But I'll bet my grater is bigger than your grater when I say "I should
>of called her".
Nothing wrong with "I should've called her." It's only when it's
typed as you have it above that it's incorrect.
|
1117.10 | | OKFINE::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Thu Oct 20 1994 09:48 | 5 |
| "Big of a deal" is much like "much of a muchness."
(Drat! My Alice books are at home!)
andrew
|
1117.11 | Twinkle, twinkle, little bat, | SLBLUZ::BROCKUS | I'm the NRA! | Thu Oct 20 1994 10:34 | 27 |
| <<< Note 1117.10 by OKFINE::KENAH "Do we have any peanut butter?" >>>
"Big of a deal" is much like "much of a muchness."
(Drat! My Alice books are at home!)
>> Mine are at work :-)
"They were learning to draw," the Dormouse
went on, yawning and rubbing its eyes, for it was
getting very sleepy; " and they drew all manner of
things--everything that begins with an M---"
"Why with an M?" said Alice.
"Why not?" said the March Hare.
Alice was silent.
The Dormouse had closed its eyes by this time,
and was going off into a doze; but, on being pinched
by the Hatter, it woke up again with a little shriek,
and went on: "---that begins with an M, such as
mouse-traps, and the moon, and memory, and
muchness--you know you say things are 'much of a
muchness'--did you ever see such a thing as drawing
of a muchness!"
"Realy, now you ask me," said Alice, very much
confused, "I don't think---"
"Then you shouldn't talk," said the Hatter.
|
1117.12 | misc | STAR::PRAETORIUS | what does the elephant need? | Thu Oct 20 1994 11:25 | 32 |
| re .3 by Tinius:
> My wife, born and raised a Massachussettsian (Burlington, Lexington,
> Billerica) says "open the light" and "shut the light". I had never
> heard that usage before I met her two years ago.
From the days of gas lamps, perhaps?
re .4 by Binder:
> An analog of this, one that grates every time I hear it, is "big of,"
> as in "It's not that big of a deal."
Geez, didja hafta go 'n make such a big deal of it?:-)
re .10 by Kenah:
I'd say "big of a deal" and "much of a muchness" are 2 of a kind.
re Alice:
A little help from the Jumpstation (searching
http://www.stir.ac.uk/jsbin/js?search
for Gutenberg) yields:
ftp://mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu/gutenberg/etext91/alice29.txt
ftp://mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu/gutenberg/etext91/snark12.txt
ftp://mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu/gutenberg/etext91/glass16.txt
(what I've told you 3 times is true)
|
1117.13 | I've got no beef with you | BARSTR::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Fri Oct 21 1994 07:46 | 10 |
| > Do you mean 'behind of' in the context of, for example, "we cooked a
>steak cut from the behind of a cow"?
If I thought you were serious, I would complain that "behind of" in that
context is rare indeed, but since the title of your reply is a smiley face, I
will congratulate you on a well-done play on words.
Clay
|
1117.14 | | LJSRV2::KALIKOW | No Federal Tacks on the Info Hwy! | Fri Oct 21 1994 11:05 | 2 |
| I thought it was a rare, rather than a well-done, play on words...
|
1117.15 | | JRDV04::DIAMOND | segmentation fault (california dumped) | Sun Oct 23 1994 16:58 | 1 |
| Or a weird play on rears...
|
1117.16 | It's just nothing | KELVIN::MCKINLEY | | Mon Oct 24 1994 09:27 | 9 |
| RE: .2
> In many languages, a device is "open" or "closed." "Please open
> the light," yeah right, don't you know the vacuum will leak out?
Will the vacuum will leak out or will the air leak in? Where does
a vacuum go if it escapes?
---Phil
|
1117.17 | The vacuums *are* out to get you! | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Mon Oct 24 1994 10:06 | 2 |
| There's an awful lot of vacuum out there, and it's already got to
the ozone layer. It's creeping in on you!
|
1117.18 | Who knows ... ? The shadow knows! | BARSTR::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Mon Oct 24 1994 10:16 | 6 |
| > Will the vacuum will leak out or will the air leak in? Where does
> a vacuum go if it escapes?
Same place the darkness goes when you turn on the light.
Clay
|
1117.19 | | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | Bushies do it for FREE! | Mon Oct 24 1994 15:19 | 16 |
| G'day,
Ahh my son has a theory about lights... They are actually darkness
vacuums... they suck in the darkons, leaving the photons to glow. The
darkons travel back along the wires to appear outside power stations as
heaps of a black substance that is then buried in big holes in the
ground...
Similarly, cut open a battery and you wil find it full of a black
substance.....
Darkness occurs only when darkons exceed photons!
derek
|
1117.20 | negative money | KALI::ROLKE | Circle with a line through it. | Tue Nov 08 1994 12:03 | 4 |
| If you find a negative-ten-dollar bill in the street then are you required
to pick it up?
Chuck
|