[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference thebay::joyoflex

Title:The Joy of Lex
Notice:A Notes File even your grammar could love
Moderator:THEBAY::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 28 1986
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1192
Total number of notes:42769

1074.0. "Willing/temporary suspension of [dis]belief?" by DYPSS1::DYSERT (Barry - Custom Software Development) Tue Nov 23 1993 09:09

    Has anyone heard of an expression similar to what I have as this note's
    title? There's some catchy phrase that I can't quite quote exactly. The
    meaning is that we temporarily/willingly choose to accept something as
    true when it's false (or vice versa) so that a story retains its
    integrity.
    
    For example, I've been watching "Lois and Clark" (i.e. the Superman
    show that's on Sunday nights). Of course it's silly to think that no
    one realizes that Clark is Superman simply because Clark wears glasses
    and has a slightly different hairdo.
    
    For me to enjoy the show I have to accept this otherwise unbelievable
    premise that Clark's disguise is so effective. Is it a "willing
    suspension of disbelief" that I'm exercising? What is the exact phrase
    I'm thinking of? And assuming that this phrase isn't original with me
    (and I don't think it is), who is credited with it and under what
    circumstances?
    
    	BD�
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1074.1OKFINE::KENAHI���-) (���) {��^} {^�^} {���} /��\Tue Nov 23 1993 09:424
    The exact phrase is "willing suspension of disbelief."  I forget
    its source.  I suspect it's listed in Bartlett's.
    
    					andrew
1074.2Actually ...TELGAR::WAKEMANLAWhere's the last End If?Tue Nov 23 1993 09:444
What Barry is displaying is a willing suspension of
good taste;-}

Larry
1074.3not that Superman needs defending...DYPSS1::DYSERTBarry - Custom Software DevelopmentTue Nov 23 1993 12:2010
    Thanks, Andrew! I don't have Bartlett's so I can't look it up myself. I
    am curious to know its etymology, though.
    
    Larry, didn't you ever read Superman comics? I've only seen the show a
    few times, but so far I like it even more than the comics. It's one of
    the few TV shows that reinforces the concept of good overcoming evil
    without polluting the ethic with sex, violence, bad language, etc.
    Good, wholesome, family entertainment :-)!
    
    	BD�
1074.4SMURF::BINDERVita venit sine tituloTue Nov 23 1993 13:175
    "That willing suspension of disbelief for the moment, which constitutes
    poetic faith."
    
    				- Samuel Taylor Coleridge, quoted in T.
    				  Allsop's "Recollection," 1836
1074.5JIT081::DIAMOND$ SET MIDNIGHTTue Nov 23 1993 16:454
    The idea that good can overpower evil requires a permanent suspension
    of disbelief.
    
    However, the idea that a person can fly has been proven wright.
1074.6DYPSS1::DYSERTBarry - Custom Software DevelopmentWed Nov 24 1993 05:2220
Re .4 (SMURF::BINDER)
    
    Thanks for the exact quote. Do you know what Mr. Coleridge was talking
    about at the time?

Re .5 (JIT081::DIAMOND)

>    The idea that good can overpower evil requires a permanent suspension
>    of disbelief.
    
    I've read the last chapter of the Book - the Good wins :-)!
    
>    However, the idea that a person can fly has been proven wright.
    
    In case you didn't realize it, I'm from Dayton Ohio - the birthplace of
    aviation (well, at least that's what the chamber of commerce
    advertises). If you ever come to town I'll take you to the Wright
    bicycle shop.
    
    	BD�
1074.7Pedantry to the fore!KERNEL::MORRISWhich universe did you dial?Wed Nov 24 1993 05:4512
    re. -1
    
    
>    In case you didn't realize it, I'm from Dayton Ohio - the birthplace of
>    aviation (well, at least that's what the chamber of commerce
>    advertises).
    
    I would have thought that the Montgolfier brothers' birthpace might
    dispute the claim.
    
    Jon
    
1074.8real engineers, not tinkerersRAGMOP::T_PARMENTERWhite folks can't clapWed Nov 24 1993 05:538
    What the Wright Brothers did (in Dayton) was a legitimate achievement
    of engineering.  Many people had been thrown through the air for
    various distances on heavier-than-air craft.  The Wrights, however,
    preceded the invention of the airplane with the invention of the wind
    tunnel.  That is, they knew exactly what they were doing and why in
    worked and wer able to fine-tune their design before taking it to Kitty
    Hawk.
    
1074.9PADNOM::MAILLARDDenis MAILLARDWed Nov 24 1993 06:177
    Re .8: Over 10 years before the Wright brothers, Clement Ader did it
    too with his "avion III". The word means "airplane" today in French,
    but that was the name he gave to his aircrafts because, rather than
    inventing a wind tunnel, he had modeled it on the seabirds he had spent
    quite a long time studying ("avis" means "bird" in Latin). Different
    kind of engineering and technique.
    			Denis.
1074.10What did Ader do?TLE::JBISHOPWed Nov 24 1993 07:3713
    Were the Wrights not the first to satisfy four important 
    requirements for real flight?
    
    1.	Take off, fly and land without crashing
    2.	Take-off point no higher than the landing point
    3. 	A vehicle heavier than air
    4.	A human pilot
    
    I'm aware of various attempts (but not Ader's), each of which
    failed one of these tests (perhaps this should go to another
    conference...).
    
    		-John Bishop
1074.11More on the Wrights...ATYISB::HILLCome on lemmings, let's go!Wed Nov 24 1993 07:413
    They also had a power plant
    
    Nick
1074.12SMURF::BINDERCum dignitate otiumWed Nov 24 1993 08:566
    Re .10
    
    There is some amount of documentary evidence that in fact the first
    successful powered HTA flight with a human pilot was made in Australia
    in 1902.  I don't remember where I saw that evidence, though, so you
    are free to write it off as an urban legend.  :-)
1074.13OKFINE::KENAHI���-) (���) {��^} {^�^} {���} /��\Wed Nov 24 1993 10:174
    >I don't remember where I saw that evidence, though, so you are free to
    >write it off as an urban legend.  :-)
    
    Somewhere in the TRIVIA conference, as I recall...          
1074.14PRSSOS::MAILLARDDenis MAILLARDThu Nov 25 1993 00:1211
    Re .10: Ader flew the "Avion III" in the 1880's, if I remember well. It
    satisfied all of the four requirements in .10 and had a power plant.
    Its flight was somewhat shorter than that of the Wright brothers,
    though (well under one kilometer, I think). The "Avion III" is still
    today in display in the Mus�e National des Arts et M�tiers in Paris,
    but I made a small mistake in .9: Ader spent quite a while observing
    the birds and other flying animals to design his crafts (as its name
    implies, the one that succeeded was the third one), but the aspect of
    the "Avion III" was much more that of a bat with one propeller on each
    wing than that of a gull or any other seabird.
    			Denis.
1074.15(a.k.a. rathole)HLDE01::STEENWINKELThis space intentionally left blankThu Nov 25 1993 00:285
    I sense a willing suspension of the basenote topic ...
    
                                                        
                                                  - Rik -
    
1074.16Returning theretoFORTY2::KNOWLESIntegrated Service: 2B+OThu Nov 25 1993 06:095
    If you want a primary source, Coleridge wrote the words Dick
    cited in chapter 14 of Biographia Literaria. You could find some
    more context there, but I don't have a copy.
    
    b
1074.17RAGMOP::T_PARMENTERWhite folks can't clapMon Nov 29 1993 05:362
    The bird approach didn't take off to the degree that the wind-tunnel 
    approach has.