T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
941.1 | | JIT081::DIAMOND | Order temporarily out of personal name | Mon Jan 20 1992 23:02 | 5 |
| >This is a classical "Britishism" that's virtually unheard on the lips
>of speakers of American.
I wouldn't have thought that anyone would dare to make such an
outlandish claim.
|
941.2 | | MICKY::SIMPSON | | Tue Jan 21 1992 01:21 | 11 |
|
I would have thought that by now you would understand that we invented
English and to speak it proper like, you have to be from the British
Isles. And furthermore I would have thought that you'd know what complete
bollox you speak over in the good 'ol U.S. of apple pie A.
I would have thought anyway.
Love and I would have thoughts
Jamie
|
941.3 | | XANADU::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Tue Jan 21 1992 04:07 | 3 |
| Do any Brits say "Who'd 'a' thunk it?"
(Trans. "Who would have thought that such a thing could happen?")
|
941.4 | Guilty as charged | MARVIN::KNOWLES | Caveat vendor | Tue Jan 21 1992 06:59 | 4 |
| Yep. My mother used to. But she worked for Technicolor, and I suspect
(guess) quite a few Americanisms crept into the mother tongue I learnt.
b
|
941.5 | | MR4DEC::EGRACE | oh. but I'm not. | Tue Jan 21 1992 08:29 | 4 |
| I use "I would have thought" whenever it is appropriate.
E Grace
|
941.6 | Would have thought so | ESCROW::ROBERTS | | Tue Jan 21 1992 10:42 | 8 |
| re .0
Well, you might not hear it on TV sit coms, or at the wrestling
matches, but I am an American, and I hear, and use, this phrase
frequently. I would have thought you would have heard it if you had
spent any time here.
-ellie
|
941.7 | | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Tue Jan 21 1992 11:00 | 11 |
| Re: .0
It isn't common here, but it is used. It doesn't seem particularly
parsimonious to me; in fact, it seems a bit awkward. Perhaps that is a
difference between speakers of the Queen's English and the rest of us.
A "Britishism" that you will _not_ hear spoken by self-respecting
Americans is "shan't." Too bad, I say, but we seem quite serious about
it.
Bernie
|
941.8 | Well, I'll be ... | FUTURS::ELLIOT | | Thu Jan 23 1992 06:21 | 7 |
|
> Do any Brits say "Who'd 'a' thunk it?"
Most of the people I know seem to have more, er, colourful ways of
expressing surprise!
June.
|
941.9 | oops, wrong topic? | MARVIN::KNOWLES | Caveat vendor | Thu Jan 23 1992 06:45 | 7 |
| > Do any Brits say "Who'd 'a' thunk it?"
Incidentally, there's a pub not too far from Reading called
The Who'd 'a' Tho't It. And if you think that's hard to read
you should try reading the pub sign.
b
|
941.10 | | SHALOT::ANDERSON | Dirhinous, bimanal ectomorph | Thu Jan 23 1992 14:00 | 3 |
| I have asked the moderator to change the title of this note to:
JOYOFLEX Official Merkin Information Repository
|
941.11 | some of us have a clue | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Fri Jan 24 1992 06:57 | 14 |
|
>> Well, you might not hear it on TV sit coms, or at the wrestling
>> matches, but I am an American, and I hear, and use, this phrase
>> frequently. I would have thought you would have heard it if you had
>> spent any time here.
>> -ellie
I agree with you Ellie - that has been my experience as well.
Diane
PS "at the wrestling matches" - I love it. 8^)
|
941.12 | There's ::SUBURBan ::SKULDUggery afoot... | RDVAX::KALIKOW | Unintelligiblets | Fri Jan 24 1992 08:11 | 20 |
| hmmm. I have exercised "Droit du Auteur" and RE-changed the /TITLE of
this note back to a reasonable facsimile of its natal state. Whoever
coerced our Noble Moderati to change the title to something like
"JOYOFLEX OFFICIAL MERKIN INFORMATION REPOSITORY" is a goateed
blackguard whose goatee is of suspicious provenance indeed.
Any by the bye, wot happened to those two O-So-Deliteful notes about
the usage of merkins in James Bond novels? That were a gross slander
both on St. Ian Fleming and on his creation, (Sir) James Bond. I, for
one, was happy to see their mysterious disappearance. ::SUBURBANs are
fine in their place, donchaknow, but any who can't distinguish between
entomology and etymology risk DECwindows DEFenestration in these
August Precincts.
So BEGONE, AVAUNT, and fare-thee-well, and stop muckin about with me
/TITs. Oops /TITLEs.
Darn, I hate it when than happens -- How Come Dat Funny, anyhoo? And
wasn't dis where I came in? :-)
|
941.13 | Would of, could of, schmould of | CALS::THACKERAY | | Wed Jun 03 1992 14:17 | 14 |
| The "Who'd a tho't it" is a delightful pub on Nine-mile-ride,
Crowthorne (near Reading, Berkshire).
Back to the "I would have thought..." commentary: actually, I tend to
use this form occasionally, in an unconscious manner, usually when
trying to construct the rest of my sentence. At least it's better than
saying "um, er".
But this is infinitely better than most of the people I meet here in
the USA who would articulate it as "I would of thought...."
Tally-ho,
Ray
|
941.14 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Wed Jun 03 1992 16:03 | 7 |
| No. What they are saying is:
"I would've thought ....",
"would've" being a contraction for "would have". They are not saying:
"I would of thought ...."
|
941.15 | | JIT081::DIAMOND | bad wiring. That was probably it. Very bad. | Wed Jun 03 1992 19:26 | 3 |
| >They are not saying: "I would of thought ...."
You're right. They're WRITING "I would of thought ...."
|
941.16 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Thu Jun 04 1992 00:49 | 2 |
| Hmmm. Have you actually seen "I would of thought" in writing?
If so, I'll grumble with you.
|
941.17 | Yes. | GENSIS::LAVEY | Ahh... pronoun trouble. | Thu Jun 04 1992 06:55 | 7 |
| > Hmmm. Have you actually seen "I would of thought" in writing?
I've seen it.
[grumble...]
-- Cathy
|
941.18 | | VALKYR::RUST | | Thu Jun 04 1992 07:07 | 11 |
| I've seen it, too. Often. In Digital notes conferences, even!
I used to grumble; now I just toss it in the its/it's/lose/loose
bucket. One of these days the bucket is going to be full, and then I
shall probably ram my car into an advertising agency somewhere in
desperate but unavailing protest...
Who'd of thought I'd loose my self-control - but that's what its come
to. <Sheesh, that hurt just to type!>
-b
|
941.19 | | JIT081::DIAMOND | bad wiring. That was probably it. Very bad. | Thu Jun 04 1992 19:21 | 11 |
| I first saw it as a T.A. while marking the assignments of undergraduate
students. I'm pretty sure that I saw it ONLY in assignments that were
written by native ******* speakers. Since the growth of Usenet, I've
seen it a lot more often, and yes I think I've also seen it in Digital
notesfiles. Again, probably ONLY in writings by native ******* speakers.
[******* Although the laws of Japan allow and sometimes enforce
discrimination against some ethnic groups and languages, in the
interest of valuing differences I refrain from naming the language.]
-- Norman Diamond
|
941.20 | | PRSSOS::MAILLARD | Denis MAILLARD | Fri Jun 05 1992 00:48 | 6 |
| Re .19:
> [******* Although the laws of Japan allow and sometimes enforce
> discrimination against some ethnic groups and languages, in the
I'm interested, Norman. Care to elaborate a bit?
Denis.
|
941.21 | Norman's dry humor | SIMON::SZETO | Simon Szeto, International Sys. Eng. | Fri Jun 05 1992 21:05 | 8 |
| ******* = English. Actually, I have only seen native American
(not to be confused with Native American) speakers write "would of"
but then I have not seen enough writings from English speakers.
Somebody who learned English as a second language would've known
better.
--Simon
|
941.22 | | VENICE::SKELLY | | Fri Jun 05 1992 22:41 | 3 |
| "I would have thought", (not "I would of") seems like a perfectly
natural expression to this native speaker of American English. What I
can't stand is the expression "If I would have...".
|
941.23 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Fri Jun 05 1992 23:41 | 2 |
| My younger daughter persists in using "would of" despite continual
correction, but her best friend is American.
|
941.24 | Official imprimatur | PENUTS::NOBLE | Stranger ones have come by here | Mon Jun 08 1992 08:11 | 13 |
| > What I can't stand is the expression "If I would have...".
This misuse of the subjunctive has become endemic. Even Quayle
gets this wrong (no surprises there, I suppose):
"...[I'd be ready] if that tragic event would occur".
It sounds like he _wants_ it to happen.
Still, George also weighs in:
"I still feel the economy is recovering, and I believe
it's going to be a more robust of a recovery in the
second quarter...".
...Robert
|
941.25 | Not a lot of people know that! | TRUCKS::WINWOOD | Life has surface noise too | Tue Jun 09 1992 01:49 | 5 |
| Re: .13
The 'Who'd a thought it' sign is also used by an incredibly small
pub in the middle of Dartmoor here in the UK. Dartmoor is otherwise
famous for its bleakness and a prison!
|