[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference thebay::joyoflex

Title:The Joy of Lex
Notice:A Notes File even your grammar could love
Moderator:THEBAY::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 28 1986
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1192
Total number of notes:42769

941.0. "''I would have thought...'' Merkins...NOT!! :-)" by RDVAX::KALIKOW (Unintelligiblets) Mon Jan 20 1992 16:54

    This is a classical "Britishism" that's virtually unheard on the lips
    of speakers of American.  I was enjoying its repetitive and
    extraordinarily apt usage at the 1300 GMT edition of the BBC World
    Service last Friday morning...  
    
    The newsreader was going on about the hypothesized political views of a
    once-famous figure out of the Algerian liberation movement of the '50s,
    who is apparently being asked to come out of retirement, Cincinnatus-
    like, to lead his nation through troubled times.  
    
    When asked whether this man had set any preconditions for his return to
    prominence, the commentator delivered himself of many fascinating
    paragraphs containing the phrase, such as "I would have thought that
    he'd made sure of that, ... " and "One would have thought so, but
    yet..."  The commentator didn't have DIRECT knowledge of the state of
    his subject's mind, so he turned to the "conditional-third-person-
    subjunctive" (izzat right?)...
                 
    I found it charming not so much for the quintessentially British turn
    of phrase, so rarely heard in the USA, but because of its delicious
    parsimony.  The only comparable ways to render the same complex
    hypothetical conditionality in American would have been kludges like "I
    guess he'd have had to have made sure of that -- it would have been
    expected that he would have"  and "I guess so -- he'd have made a
    mistake if he didn't, but I guess he didn't."
    
    I liked it.  
    
    Discuss.  :-)
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
941.1JIT081::DIAMONDOrder temporarily out of personal nameMon Jan 20 1992 23:025
    >This is a classical "Britishism" that's virtually unheard on the lips
    >of speakers of American.
    
    I wouldn't have thought that anyone would dare to make such an
    outlandish claim.
941.2MICKY::SIMPSONTue Jan 21 1992 01:2111
    
    I would have thought that by now you would understand that we invented
    English and to speak it proper like, you have to be from the British
    Isles.  And furthermore I would have thought that you'd know what complete
    bollox you speak over in the good 'ol U.S. of apple pie A.
    
    I would have thought anyway.
    
    Love and I would have thoughts
    
    Jamie
941.3XANADU::RECKARDJon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63Tue Jan 21 1992 04:073
Do any Brits say "Who'd 'a' thunk it?"

(Trans. "Who would have thought that such a thing could happen?")
941.4Guilty as chargedMARVIN::KNOWLESCaveat vendorTue Jan 21 1992 06:594
    Yep. My mother used to. But she worked for Technicolor, and I suspect
    (guess) quite a few Americanisms crept into the mother tongue I learnt.
    
    b
941.5MR4DEC::EGRACEoh. but I'm not.Tue Jan 21 1992 08:294
    I use "I would have thought" whenever it is appropriate.  
    
    
    E Grace
941.6Would have thought soESCROW::ROBERTSTue Jan 21 1992 10:428
    re .0
    
    Well, you might not hear it on TV sit coms, or at the wrestling
    matches, but I am an American, and I hear, and use, this phrase 
    frequently.  I would have thought you would have heard it if you had
    spent any time here.
    
    -ellie  
941.7SSDEVO::GOLDSTEINTue Jan 21 1992 11:0011
    Re: .0
    
    It isn't common here, but it is used.  It doesn't seem particularly
    parsimonious to me; in fact, it seems a bit awkward.  Perhaps that is a
    difference between speakers of the Queen's English and the rest of us.
    
    A "Britishism" that you will _not_ hear spoken by self-respecting
    Americans is "shan't."  Too bad, I say, but we seem quite serious about
    it.
    
    Bernie
941.8Well, I'll be ...FUTURS::ELLIOTThu Jan 23 1992 06:217
    > Do any Brits say "Who'd 'a' thunk it?"

    Most of the people I know seem to have more, er, colourful ways of 
    expressing surprise!

    June.
941.9oops, wrong topic?MARVIN::KNOWLESCaveat vendorThu Jan 23 1992 06:457
    > Do any Brits say "Who'd 'a' thunk it?"
    
    Incidentally, there's a pub not too far from Reading called 
    The Who'd 'a' Tho't It. And if you think that's hard to read
    you should try reading the pub sign.
    
    b
941.10SHALOT::ANDERSONDirhinous, bimanal ectomorphThu Jan 23 1992 14:003
	I have asked the moderator to change the title of this note to:

		JOYOFLEX Official Merkin Information Repository
941.11some of us have a cluePENUTS::DDESMAISONSFri Jan 24 1992 06:5714
    
   >> Well, you might not hear it on TV sit coms, or at the wrestling
   >> matches, but I am an American, and I hear, and use, this phrase 
   >> frequently.  I would have thought you would have heard it if you had
   >> spent any time here.
    
   >> -ellie  


	I agree with you Ellie - that has been my experience as well.

	Diane

	PS "at the wrestling matches" - I love it. 8^)
941.12There's ::SUBURBan ::SKULDUggery afoot...RDVAX::KALIKOWUnintelligibletsFri Jan 24 1992 08:1120
    hmmm.  I have exercised "Droit du Auteur" and RE-changed the /TITLE of
    this note back to a reasonable facsimile of its natal state.  Whoever
    coerced our Noble Moderati to change the title to something like
    "JOYOFLEX OFFICIAL MERKIN INFORMATION REPOSITORY" is a goateed
    blackguard whose goatee is of suspicious provenance indeed.
    
    Any by the bye, wot happened to those two O-So-Deliteful notes about
    the usage of merkins in James Bond novels?  That were a gross slander
    both on St. Ian Fleming and on his creation, (Sir) James Bond.  I, for
    one, was happy to see their mysterious disappearance.  ::SUBURBANs are
    fine in their place, donchaknow, but any who can't distinguish between
    entomology and etymology risk DECwindows DEFenestration in these
    August Precincts.
    
    So BEGONE, AVAUNT, and fare-thee-well, and stop muckin about with me
    /TITs.  Oops /TITLEs.  
    
    Darn, I hate it when than happens -- How Come Dat Funny, anyhoo?  And
    wasn't dis where I came in?  :-)
            
941.13Would of, could of, schmould ofCALS::THACKERAYWed Jun 03 1992 14:1714
    The "Who'd a tho't it" is a delightful pub on Nine-mile-ride,
    Crowthorne (near Reading, Berkshire).
    
    Back to the "I would have thought..." commentary: actually, I tend to
    use this form occasionally, in an unconscious manner, usually when
    trying to construct the rest of my sentence. At least it's better than
    saying "um, er".
    
    But this is infinitely better than most of the people I meet here in
    the USA who would articulate it as "I would of thought...."
    
    Tally-ho,
    
    Ray
941.14SSDEVO::EGGERSAnybody can fly with an engine.Wed Jun 03 1992 16:037
    No.  What they are saying is:
    
    	"I would've thought ....",
    
    "would've" being a contraction for "would have". They are not saying:
    
    	"I would of thought ...."
941.15JIT081::DIAMONDbad wiring. That was probably it. Very bad.Wed Jun 03 1992 19:263
    >They are not saying:  "I would of thought ...."
    
    You're right.  They're WRITING "I would of thought ...."
941.16SSDEVO::EGGERSAnybody can fly with an engine.Thu Jun 04 1992 00:492
    Hmmm.  Have you actually seen "I would of thought" in writing?
    If so, I'll grumble with you.
941.17Yes.GENSIS::LAVEYAhh... pronoun trouble.Thu Jun 04 1992 06:557
>    Hmmm.  Have you actually seen "I would of thought" in writing?

I've seen it.

[grumble...]

-- Cathy
941.18VALKYR::RUSTThu Jun 04 1992 07:0711
    I've seen it, too. Often. In Digital notes conferences, even!
    
    I used to grumble; now I just toss it in the its/it's/lose/loose
    bucket. One of these days the bucket is going to be full, and then I
    shall probably ram my car into an advertising agency somewhere in
    desperate but unavailing protest...
    
    Who'd of thought I'd loose my self-control - but that's what its come
    to. <Sheesh, that hurt just to type!>
    
    -b
941.19JIT081::DIAMONDbad wiring. That was probably it. Very bad.Thu Jun 04 1992 19:2111
    I first saw it as a T.A. while marking the assignments of undergraduate
    students.  I'm pretty sure that I saw it ONLY in assignments that were
    written by native ******* speakers.  Since the growth of Usenet, I've
    seen it a lot more often, and yes I think I've also seen it in Digital
    notesfiles.  Again, probably ONLY in writings by native ******* speakers.
    
    [******* Although the laws of Japan allow and sometimes enforce
    discrimination against some ethnic groups and languages, in the
    interest of valuing differences I refrain from naming the language.]
    
    -- Norman Diamond
941.20PRSSOS::MAILLARDDenis MAILLARDFri Jun 05 1992 00:486
    Re .19:
>    [******* Although the laws of Japan allow and sometimes enforce
>    discrimination against some ethnic groups and languages, in the
    
    	I'm interested, Norman. Care to elaborate a bit?
    			Denis.
941.21Norman's dry humorSIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Fri Jun 05 1992 21:058
    ******* = English.  Actually, I have only seen native American
    (not to be confused with Native American) speakers write "would of"
    but then I have not seen enough writings from English speakers.
    Somebody who learned English as a second language would've known
    better.
    
    --Simon
    
941.22VENICE::SKELLYFri Jun 05 1992 22:413
    "I would have thought", (not "I would of") seems like a perfectly
    natural expression to this native speaker of American English. What I
    can't stand is the expression "If I would have...".
941.23PASTIS::MONAHANhumanity is a trojan horseFri Jun 05 1992 23:412
    	My younger daughter persists in using "would of" despite continual
    correction, but her best friend is American.
941.24Official imprimaturPENUTS::NOBLEStranger ones have come by hereMon Jun 08 1992 08:1113
>    What I can't stand is the expression "If I would have...".

This misuse of the subjunctive has become endemic. Even Quayle
gets this wrong (no surprises there, I suppose): 
    "...[I'd be ready] if that tragic event would occur". 
It sounds like he _wants_ it to happen. 

Still, George also weighs in:
    "I still feel the economy is recovering, and I believe
    it's going to be a more robust of a recovery in the
    second quarter...".

...Robert
941.25Not a lot of people know that!TRUCKS::WINWOODLife has surface noise tooTue Jun 09 1992 01:495
    Re: .13
    
    The 'Who'd a thought it'  sign is also used by an incredibly small
    pub in the middle of Dartmoor here in the UK.  Dartmoor is otherwise
    famous for its bleakness and a prison!