[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference thebay::joyoflex

Title:The Joy of Lex
Notice:A Notes File even your grammar could love
Moderator:THEBAY::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 28 1986
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1192
Total number of notes:42769

566.0. "To Boldly Split Infinitives or Not?" by DLNVAX::BREEDING () Thu Sep 29 1988 18:09

"Split infinitives are no longer taboo among newspaper and magazine editors,
says Richard Tobin, Indiana University professor emeritus.  Some 52% of 
editors surveyed said a sentence using the words 'to instantly trace' is
acceptable.  Seven years ago, 90% would have found it unprintable."

				Wall Street Journal  9/29/88  p. 1

What does everyone else think?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
566.1Could you repeat the question?PSTJTT::TABERAnswer hazy -- ask again laterThu Sep 29 1988 18:2823
I think:

	- The Wall Street Journal *did* print that.

	- The word "it" was considered printable seven years ago, and 
	  even before that.

	- 52% of all editors weren't really surveyed.

	- Even if 52% *were* surveyed, I find it hard to
	  believe they said "a sentence using the words 'to instantly
	  trace' is acceptable" without at least some prompting from
	  the surveyor.  Or is it just saying that they said a
	  sentence using the words "to instantly trace" in it? It
	  still strains the imagination that they would all come up
	  with the same phrase without some encouragement, like
	  "A thousand pardons, your editoriacy, but can you use the phrase 
	  'to instantly trace in a sentence? In a case like that, I would 
	  believe that 52% of them could manage it. (And 
	  even more of them if they were told there was a free drink 
	  in it for them.)


566.2"To be or to not be", is that the question?PAMOLA::RECKARDJon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63Thu Sep 29 1988 18:410
566.3AKOV11::BOYAJIANThat was Zen; this is DaoFri Sep 30 1988 07:556
    This is one of those cases in which I feel that the "rule" is
    rather artificial. I try to avoid splitting infinitives, but
    it's more out of habit than anything else. Unless the resulting
    phrase is clumsy, who cares?
    
    --- jerry
566.4please don't _do_ that!!!MARKER::KALLISAnger's no replacement for reasonFri Sep 30 1988 13:4610
    Re .3 (Jerry):
    
    I care.
    
    In my opinion, the only time an infinitive _may_ be split is when
    doing so would avoid ambiguities.
    
    Split infinitives set my teeth on edge.
    
    Steve Kallis, Jr.
566.5Forget itCLOSET::T_PARMENTERTongue in cheek, fist in air!Fri Sep 30 1988 14:292
    There is no such rule in English.  It is a Latin rule.  Fowler is
    hilarious on split infinitives.
566.6Jokur::GrammarEAGLE1::EGGERSTom,293-5358,VAX&MIPS ArchitectureFri Sep 30 1988 23:563
    See also JOKUR::Grammar, topic 9.
    
    Press KP7, etc.