T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
484.1 | | SUNSIP::LIRON | | Fri Feb 26 1988 11:29 | 12 |
| A few years ago, we received a telex from Germany, which ended with
the usual MFG (abbreviation of "Mit freundlichem Gruss").
A colleague undertook to reply in his best German freshly learnt
from school; so he politely started with:
Sehr geehrte Mfg ! (Dear Mfg)
Bien � vous,
roger
|
484.2 | here are a few | ERASER::KALLIS | A Dhole isn't a political animal. | Fri Feb 26 1988 15:47 | 24 |
| On the subject of letters, a few:
I usually close with "Sincerely," since I mean what I say.
William F. Buckley, Jr., generally closes with, "Cordially,".
H. Allen Smith, when irritated at someone, took a leaf from a child's
letter-to-an-editor, and closed with, "Worst regards,".
My favorite of all time, though, was in an Arthor Conan Doyle story,
where his (somewhat eccentric) character, Professor George Edward
Challenger, wrote a blistering letter to someone he was furious
at and closed it:
I remain, Sir, as I began,
George Edward Challenger
Steve Kallis, Jr.
P.S. I used the "Challenger" close on a letter of complaint once
and got back a reply by _telegram_. That was before the days
of overnight delivery, of course.
|
484.3 | >sigh!< | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IPG Reading UK | Fri Feb 26 1988 17:33 | 3 |
| > That was before the days of overnight delivery, of course.
We had that too, once.
|
484.4 | | VIDEO::DCL | David Larrick | Sat Feb 27 1988 20:48 | 21 |
|
Here's something I wrote on the subject, a couple years ago, for another
forum. The details are kinda obscure out of context, but I think you'll
get the idea.
Those of you who correspond with me may have noticed that I like to sign
off messages with the word "Cheers". You can't really sign your name (in
handwriting) to a mail message or notesfile entry, of course, but many
people type their names anyway, despite the fact that PERSONAL_NAME headers
and NMAIL footers automatically identify them several times already. Other
people include their initials, little animals composed from ASCII
characters, clever sayings, and so forth. Well, my initials are already
present in my username, so I settle for "Cheers".
This usage is, partly, a theatrical pun. The word is a concise toast (as
in drinking), and is also an appropriate affectation for a mild Anglophile
(sure confuses real Limeys, such as VNS readers!). But the sense in which
I most enjoy the word is as a STAGE DIRECTION, as in "cue the audience to
start applauding" or "applause comes here". Somehow the idea of ending my
mail messages with curtain calls appeals to me...as does the idea that only
theater people will recognize it!
|
484.5 | | HANZI::SIMONSZETO | Simon Szeto@HGO, ABSS/Hongkong | Mon Feb 29 1988 10:35 | 15 |
| The practice of putting one's name at the end of a note is the subject
of one of the topics in the ETIQUETTE conference. It's less meaningful
these days, what with "personal name" fields in VAX Notes; but I
started "signing" my notes with my name in the days before VAX Notes
and personal names.
About the original subject, I notice that there are different norms
in different regions or organizations. Here in DEC Far East, I
notice that "Best regards" is used a lot; I guess just plain "Regards"
isn't good enough. "Warm regards" from someone in Singapore, I
suppose to have a double meaning. "Cheers" I get from a lot from
UK correspondents. And so forth.
--Simon
|
484.6 | on the other hand ... | ERASER::KALLIS | A Dhole isn't a political animal. | Mon Feb 29 1988 18:17 | 11 |
| Re .5 (Simon):
>...I notice that "Best regards" is used a lot; I guess just plain "Regards"
>isn't good enough. ...
Oh, I think "regards" means you are aware of another person's presence
and existence. In that context, "Best regards," would mean you
wish the person well, and the H. Alan Smith example, "Worst regards,"
would mean you would wish the opposite.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
484.7 | | HANZI::SIMONSZETO | Simon Szeto@HGO, ABSS/Hongkong | Sat Mar 05 1988 02:36 | 9 |
| I take the meaning of "Worst regards." But my point is that when
one gets to type from habit "Best regards" without even thinking,
it's rather perfunctory, and no more meaningful than plain "Regards"
or even nothing at all. Over here, I suppose that I would have
to say "Very best regards" or something totally different from the
norm to really wish someone well from my heart.
--Simon
|
484.8 | The diurnal rotations of overnight delivery | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | $50 never killed anybody | Sat Mar 05 1988 14:49 | 11 |
| Signing one's name to the bottom of a note isn't necessarily
superfluous, since many people use the personal name field for
witty remarks rather than their names.
re:.2
Why does the phrase "days of overnight delivery" strike me as
an oxymoron? How can it be the "days" of anything if it's done
at night? :-)
--- jerry
|
484.9 | Heres to Cheers | AIAG::KAMESH | AIAG::KAMESH Ramakrishna, DTN 291-8105, DLB5-3/B10 | Thu Jun 30 1988 06:23 | 9 |
| I picked up the sign-off "Cheers" from my advisor Allen Newell. For
years I resisted and tried all kinds of alternatives, but the
simplicity, joyousness, and collegiality of Cheers could not be
improved upon. For the last five or six years I have been using it,
and I have been noticing other people (not UK, but USA-types) around
me cottoning on.
Cheers,
-- Kamesh
|
484.10 | I also like G'day! | HERON::BUCHANAN | a small Bear travels thru a Forest | Thu Jun 30 1988 11:56 | 10 |
| Re -.1, I quite like, but don't use, the related German signoff:
Tschuss,
I don't know the etymology, but I've wondered if it might be a Teutonification
of "Cheers", picked up from American/British visitors/military personnel. Any
one out there able to clarify.
Cheers,
Andrew
|
484.11 | | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | sculpted from impassioned clay | Thu Jun 30 1988 15:29 | 14 |
| when sending along things to business associates that I want a response
to, I sign off: rsvp!
when I'm asking someone for something, I show I am appreciative
in advance for what they will do with: thanks! (or thanx!)
when I'm sending to friends, and it's casual, it's
ciao
or
ciao for now
-Jody
|
484.12 | flisky wisty pomm, | CHARON::MCGLINCHEY | Sancho! My Armor! My TECO Macros! | Thu Jun 30 1988 16:21 | 22 |
|
There's an entertaining note from Robert Benchley to someone in
an anthology I have. It's all nonsense words, but done with the
right structure and meter to sound right. I can't remember all of
it, but the sign-off is one I've adopted at times:
Inkly tinkly pobble-bockle abble squabs? flosky! beeble trimble
flosky! Okulscratch a bibblebongibo ferry moyassity amsky flamsky
damsky crocklefeater squiggs.
Flisky wisty pomm,
Slushypipp
If I can find it, I'll post the whole thing
-- Glinch.
|
484.13 | p.s. this note contains no footnote | GAOV11::MAXPROG6 | If you can't beat 'em .. join 'em | Thu Jun 30 1988 21:17 | 15 |
|
I can't remember why , but I always used to sign-off official letters
with simply 'Yours' , and then my name .
Now I use 'regards' as a formality , or 'best regards' if the person
has at some time , bought me a pint .
I have never used 'cheers' in writing , but almost exclusively as
an alternative to 'thank you' . Having lived in Munich for 18 months
I've found myself saying 'prost' before tilting glass to face .
toodle-pip
John J
|
484.14 | and how! | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | sculpted from impassioned clay | Thu Jun 30 1988 21:38 | 9 |
| one of the funniest I've seen, from someone fairly close, was
fond(ling)ly yours,
;-)
-Jody
|
484.15 | your what ? | GAOV11::MAXPROG6 | If you can't beat 'em .. join 'em | Thu Jun 30 1988 22:47 | 9 |
|
Re .14
> from someone fairly close
They'd have to be , unless they had long arms .
John J
|
484.16 | 5 years later | CALS::GELINEAU | | Thu Jul 29 1993 14:06 | 13 |
| Ben Franklin is rumored to have closed with (in a caustic letter):
blah blah blah... you are my enemy and I remain forever
Yours,
B. Franklin
(or some such close paraphrasing)
--ag
|
484.17 | | CRADAN::KALIKOW | Buddy, can youse paradigm? | Thu Jul 29 1993 15:46 | 6 |
| Didn't someone start summat like a "Society for the revival of dormant
JOYOFLEX notes?" If so, you certainly joined well, .16!
Anyone recall what the society was called? It is as if an Occult Hand
wiped my memory clear of all recollection.
|
484.18 | NEURON -- see 86.3 | GVPROD::BARTA | Gabriel Barta/ITOps&Mgmt/Geneva | Mon Aug 16 1993 08:04 | 0 |
484.19 | | CALS::GELINEAU | | Wed Jan 12 1994 10:54 | 7 |
| re .17
thanks - i've been reading this note for many months -
it's taken me a while to work though every topic (word
association football excluded!)
--angela
|
484.20 | From a fellow 396.*-ophobe | DRDAN::KALIKOW | The Data-Highwayman | Wed Jan 12 1994 15:53 | 6 |
| Well, I should hope SO!!! :-)
(the very thought makes my blood run cold!!)
Dan
|
484.21 | | OKFINE::KENAH | The Man with the Child in his eyes | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:03 | 1 |
| I don't read 396.* -- I just try to BOX it up...
|
484.22 | Nice contraction of BOlloX, Andrew... :-) | DRDAN::KALIKOW | WWW: ``Sliced Bread's in danger!'' | Thu Jan 13 1994 14:28 | 1 |
|
|