T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
167.1 | James Thurber used it once | SUPER::KENAH | In the (subjunctive) mood | Fri Apr 04 1986 17:14 | 6 |
| 2. defn: To throw something out a window.
Funny you sjould mention this -- I actually used this word (in a
humorous context) this very week.
The act of throwing something out a window is: defenestration!
|
167.2 | | SLAYER::NTS_MCVAY | Pete McVay | Fri Apr 04 1986 19:54 | 6 |
| Actually, "defenestration" is to throw someONE out a window. It
was a popular form of assassination (see "hashashin", et. al.) in
Poland in the Middle Ages.
Durned if I can remember the word for the first one..."lucubrate"
is to study by candlelight...
|
167.3 | The opposite of "defenestration" | AVANTI::DCL | David Larrick | Sun Apr 06 1986 13:50 | 6 |
| "Fenestration", on the other hand, is NOT the act of throwing
someone INTO a window. It refers to the arrangement of the
windows on a building, and sometimes also their style and
decoration - an architectural term.
Is there a word for the act of removing the windows from a building?
|
167.4 | | AVANTI::DCL | David Larrick | Sun Apr 06 1986 13:53 | 5 |
| > 1. defn: To learn via reading rather than through experience.
"Booklarnin'" ?
(Perhaps properly spelled "booklearning", but never pronounced that way...)
|
167.5 | It doesn't do any good if you *kill* the bums! | ERIS::CALLAS | Jon Callas | Mon Apr 07 1986 13:26 | 9 |
| Actually, defenestration was most commonly used a form of political
protest rather than as a form of assassination. From what I remember
from my history of the era, deaths from defenestration were mostly
accidental. The defenestrators were generally careful to cushion the
blow with a pile of something yielding and appropriate to the offense
-- sometimes hay, but usually manure.
Jon
|
167.6 | Etymology.... | CANYON::MOELLER | plink.....plink... | Mon Apr 07 1986 15:01 | 2 |
| Could '(de)fenestration' be derived from the same root as the
German word 'fenster', or window ?
|
167.7 | Latin lives | SIVA::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Mon Apr 07 1986 17:02 | 5 |
|
It's more probable that both the English and German words are derived
from the Latin fenestra (window).
JP
|
167.8 | Exactly. | 43353::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IPG Reading-UK | Tue Apr 08 1986 12:42 | 7 |
| Not just probable. Anyone know the split between Anglo-Saxon, Latin
and Greek words in the English language? Or maybe that's a
non-question, since I'm told there's a perfectly good Anglo-Saxon
replacement for every latinate word (though not always polite).
Jeff.
|
167.9 | Doing my best to catch up! | MPGS::DOODYM | Dead Centroid | Wed Mar 25 1987 11:20 | 14 |
| Nobody seems to have tried to answer Kurt's first query, so
I'm going to give it a shot.
> 1. defn: To learn via reading rather than through experience.
I think the word you're looking for may be "vicarious", an
adjective describing an act performed on behalf of, or through the
agency of, someone else.
Hence a "vicarious existence" is lived by people who get their
thrills through the experiences and adventures of others rather than
living them out themelves; typically through escapist literature,
films, and NOTing.
|
167.10 | Booklarnin' | BAEDEV::RECKARD | | Wed Mar 25 1987 11:58 | 4 |
| > 1. defn: To learn via reading rather than through experience.
Another possibility (with an additional shade of meaning) might be
a verb form of "rote". Can someone verbify that? verbize? verbalize?.....
|
167.11 | a new word search | VENICE::SKELLY | | Wed Jul 06 1988 06:23 | 8 |
| Forgive me for just tacking this on here, but I hate starting new
topics and this title was perfect.
What is the word, akin to misogyny, meaning "hatred of women", that
means "hatred of men"? Please don't make one up. I'd like to know
that someone actually found it in a dictionary. There is no such
word (at least one that starts with "mis") in my "Webster's Seventh
New Collegiate".
|
167.12 | | YIPPEE::LIRON | | Wed Jul 06 1988 11:14 | 10 |
| re .1
Haven't checked anything, but I think it simply doesn't exist.
Nobody has such feelings :)
It it existed, it would probably be something close to 'misandry',
given that Greek for man (in the sense of male, not humanity)
is 'andros'.
roger
|
167.13 | A misanthrope | IOSG::VICKERS | Entropy isn't what it used to be | Wed Jul 06 1988 13:50 | 6 |
|
Is 'misanthropy' close, or does that refer to people rather than
men?
Paul V
|
167.14 | or simply "man-hater" | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Wed Jul 06 1988 16:13 | 8 |
| Re .13 (Paul):
I was thinkingh "misanthropy" too. The problem here is that, given
our sometimes strange language, "man" has two flavors, and misanthropy
is usually used as meaning "people" rather than just "men." However,
I suspect context could make that clear.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
167.15 | If not misterogeny, then | FDCV06::BEAIRSTO | | Wed Jul 06 1988 16:14 | 6 |
| re -.the last few: Misandry it is.
A related question: what's the word corresponding to 'uxorious'
that means excessively fond of a husband?
Rob (whose wife loves him, but not _too_ much)
|
167.16 | | ERIS::CALLAS | Waiter, there's a bug in my code | Wed Jul 06 1988 23:44 | 6 |
| Misanthropy is hating people, not males. As has been stated above,
there is no mis-mumble word in the dictionary for man-hater. However,
the word "misandry" is a parallel formation from misogyny. You won't
find it in any dictionary, but if we all use it, we will.
Jon
|
167.17 | when asked to conjugate, she declined | MARVIN::KNOWLES | the teddy-bears have their nit-pick | Thu Jul 07 1988 15:48 | 26 |
| Re: .15
Misandry it is; .12 was right (allowing for a teeny nit: `aner' is
Ancient Greek for a/the man, `andros' is the genitive.
I, too, have wondered about `uxorious'. Perhaps, when the word was
coined, there was just no scope for an overfond-of-her-husband
equivalent, since - in that time/society (Victorian, I suspect - tho'
I wouldn't be surprised if the OED proved me wrong by a few centuries)
a woman's full-time job was thought to be being fond. A word like
`uxorious' had a place in a gentleman's club; it referred to a chap
who didn't spend enough time with the chaps. Women had no such
institution.
Of course, that sort of speculation needn't stop us from coining
a word now (tho' I'm not sure how useful it would be - saying
more about the speaker's expectations than about the person
described). In this regard, it may be worth noting that Latin
for a man marrying a woman (`ducere' - he just led her away)
wasn't the same as a woman marrying a man (`sub jugum ponere' -
she put him under a yoke, or just _sub_jug_ated him).
There again, maybe it's not worth noting that. A sexist's
a sexist's a sexist, Latin or otherwise.
b
|
167.18 | | YIPPEE::LIRON | | Fri Jul 08 1988 12:54 | 15 |
| The French word (uxorien) has no 'feminine' counterpart
either. Looks like French is just as sexist as English
in this case.
We could build such a word around the Latin root 'vir', which
meant 'husband' as one of its many senses.
How about 'virous' ? As in:
"Bonnie is incredibly virous; she refuses to do anything without
her husband !".
Or perhaps we could use the root (probably germanic ?) of
'husband'.
roger
|
167.19 | Do you have my word? | GEMVAX::RICE | | Fri Sep 23 1988 22:46 | 14 |
| I am looking for a word that I am sure I heard used during news
reports of the last stock market crash. The word described the belief
that events (for example, political or economic) are manipulated
by "someone" or some group. They meant this in the sense of some
powerful, unknown person(s), not in the sense of a supreme being.
When I heard them use the word, I thought it was a great word. I
just don't remember it. If I was hallucinating, we should make up
a word that fits.
Does anyone remember this being used?
Joseph
|
167.20 | any of these? | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Fri Sep 23 1988 23:13 | 8 |
| Re .19 (Joseph):
Names/words that come to mind are "manipulators," "puppet masters,"
"players behind the scenes," "insiders," "jugglers," or "illuminati."
Bet you heard something else ...
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
167.21 | More bad buys | VAXUUM::T_PARMENTER | Tongue in cheek, fist in air! | Fri Sep 23 1988 23:48 | 2 |
| gnomes of Geneva?
|
167.22 | PMSH? | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, 293-5358, VAX Architecture | Sat Sep 24 1988 01:41 | 1 |
| megalomaniacs?
|
167.23 | Allusion collision | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | That was Zen; this is Dao | Sat Sep 24 1988 10:20 | 6 |
| re:.21
It's either the Gnomes of Zurich or The Thirteen Old Men in Geneva
Who Secretly Rule the World.
--- jerry
|
167.24 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | That was Zen; this is Dao | Sat Sep 24 1988 10:21 | 7 |
| re:.23 (note title)
(I'm aware that "allusion" doesn't really fit there, but the
phrase popped into my head, and it seemed too good to throw
away.)
--- jerry
|
167.25 | allusion delusion | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, 293-5358, VAX Architecture | Sun Sep 25 1988 22:57 | 3 |
| re .23:
He's having an allusion delusion.
|
167.26 | Demiurgism ? | YIPPEE::LIRON | | Mon Sep 26 1988 11:20 | 8 |
| re .19
Was it the name of the 'manipulators', eg the Gnomes etc ...?
Or the belief that they exist ? In this case, how about demiurgism ?
roger
|
167.27 | That's the word! | GEMVAX::RICE | | Mon Sep 26 1988 18:07 | 7 |
| I believe that demiurgism is what I was looking for. Go to the
head of the class!
Thanks
Joseph (who will probably never use the word)
|
167.28 | Assortments | MARVIN::WALSH | | Tue Apr 25 1989 13:37 | 12 |
| What about good old paranoia? Thomas Pynchon's very wonderful Gravity's
Rainbow contains, among other things, a number of "proverbs for
paranoids", some of which, if I recall correctly, are:
"Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get
you."
"You hide - they seek."
re: defenestration. There is a famous historical incident called the
Defenestration of Prague.
|