T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
529.1 | lookout below | DDIF::TANCILL | Sooner or later it all gets real | Thu Jan 21 1993 22:42 | 21 |
|
Yes.
Have you also noticed any increase in the type of advertising in SCD?
Like an increase of "Blowout - Going Out of Business" ads? I only
read SCD about once every few months, as an regular reader have you
noticed the content of the ads changing?
I think the 1989 UD Factory is also the seperate issue of all the
sudden UD "found" a bunch of 89 factories in a wharehouse.
Anyone else hear something like this? Now there is much
more supply then folks thought being reflected in the real world
marketplace.
I guess the concept of there being more product than investors
percieve, can probably be generalized to anything > 1976.
jeff
|
529.2 | | FUTURE::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715 | Fri Jan 22 1993 06:43 | 8 |
| Jeff, I don't see many ads like that, but I have noticed that some of
the past big time advertisers such as Big Bob's, New York Card Company
etc. have disappeared. They had a big story on Big Bob's awhile back
and the problems they ran into. SCD used to come in two sections for
awhile, but now they're back to one section. Used to be over 300 pages
and now they're lucky if they hit 200.
John
|
529.3 | it's a flood | XCUSME::DOWNSM | life is too short to dance with ugly women | Fri Jan 22 1993 09:10 | 12 |
| I think like anything else it has to level off or even decrease.
There is no way the market could have kept climbing the way it was.
Alot of people are jsut fed up (like me) with the flooding of sets
inserts, sub sets, sub sub sets, etc....
I still think if you put the sets away now (like the 70's) they will be
worth something later on. Until then us true "hobbyists" will keep
collecting and hopefully be rewarded by prcies coming down and some of
the flooded market starting to drain. The strong will survive like
UD, Topps, Fleer, maybe Bowman, Classic...
Mike
|
529.4 | Card Shows too! | POWDML::GASPARONI | | Mon Jan 25 1993 12:37 | 7 |
| Have you also noticed the decrease at the local card shows?? The
dealers are muddering under their breathe, this s_cks, its terrible,
its going to be a long day, wish I was home watching the game, like to
sell out if someone would make me a fair offer for all this stuff.
I see less and less dealers at the small shows, and new faces all the
time. I think its effected the whole industry and I predict a further
slide.
|
529.5 | the slide will happen. | MSDOA::PARKERJ | | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:21 | 14 |
| re: -1
Same is true for South Carolina. All the dealers whine about not being
able to sell stuff. I went to a show recently and probably 1/3 of the
tables were 50% off deals. this was the older stuff, much of it in
good condition.
I think the fact that there are so many card shops also hurts the show
biz. I can go to shops and either trade with others that go there or
the dealer. As a result people don't need to go to shows as much any
more to fill want lists. IMHO less the better, this hobby needs to
calm down. It shouldn't be like the stock market.
Jon
|
529.6 | Does Bubba Clinton collect? | SONATA::KELLY | | Mon Jan 25 1993 15:10 | 26 |
| The cash flow into the market has declined noticeably. Show recipts
for dealers are way off. The guys that are blowing stuff out are
taking in the same dollars but at break even or a loss. ( I saw Topps
wax all weekend at 2 boxes for 29.00 ). UD has filed for protection.
Topps stock fell 19% qtr to qtr. Worst of all though, the kids have
stopped feeding the monster. I think that more shake out is on the
horizon. Good stuff will get cheap-cheap stuff will be sold at
distress prices. (example- at the end of the 92 baseball card season
45 million dollars worth of product was returned to Upper Deck
by the chain stores). I was offfered 10 skids of sealed upper
deck baseball at 8.00/box. Had to take it all. I passed.
It may well be that the old maxim regarding collectors ( as told
by dealers ) may be true, but in a very ironic way. The maxim:
The one with the cards at the end of the show.............loses.
As most of yoyu know I've been deeply into this stuff for years-
I've cut back my "investments" dramatically 14 months ago.
Until something big happens ( ie BUBBA turns the economy,
or a dramatic change in product or renewed interest or
the Red Sox win the pennant ) I'm rescaling further.
It is as they say folks a buyers market.
Mike
|
529.7 | ex | QETOO::HAYES | | Mon Jan 25 1993 15:57 | 50 |
| While in Minnesota a couple weeks ago, I found a dealer that had the
50% off sign in the window. I went in and looked around. I found
Carl Yaztremski's, Larry Birds, Willy Mays, Ernie Banks and even
BOBBY ORR cards at 50% off. It wasn't 50% off of BBC high. It was
based on 50% off a price set on the condition of the card. There
were cards from 1958 up to 1980. Mint cards to VG.
I spent alot of time talking to the dealer. He had very little wax
products. He stated that he couldn't compete in the wax space anymore.
BJ's, Costco, SAMS, Target, etc.... have killed his profit. All he
bought and sold for wax was current hot stuff and that was at 1 or 2
boxes at a time.
Older cards weren't selling. He had the business for over 8 years. He
was a retired policeman that had collected for years. At first he made
money. Even last year (1991) was okay but then it died. He was selling
off some of his better stuff to get cash to buy things that still
sell at shows in Minn (Puckett's, Killebrew's, etc....). He's going
to do security work and do shows now and then. He was quite frustrated
at the major card makers (Upperdeck going chapter 7 won't have hurt
his feelings).
He also felt the insert craze has significantly hurt dealers. Sets
are so cheap singles don't sell (anyone want a Leaf 92 set, cheap!).
Gold cards in Leaf and now Topps are killing the set prices further.
I spent alot of $$$ there. He let me take all his inventory of 1958 to
1970 and pull all Red Sox (along with my childhood hero's, a Carol
Hardy from 59 before he was traded to Boston to "replace" Ted Williams,
a Bob Tillman in a Braves uniform, great stuff). He then sold them to
me very cheaply (less then $.50 a card, some were mint some VG).
I bought a 59 Ernie Banks (mint) for $20, a 61 Mays MVP card for $15
(mint), 9 Bobby Orrs (2 1975/76 for $10 each), I picked up a couple
of Al Kaline cards for one of the noters (whose is from Detroit and
old enough to remember his rookie year) cheap.
I also got almost the complete 1967 Red Sox, Tony and Billy C. cards.
4 Frank Malzone's (my grandmother's all-time favorite), Rico
Petrocelli's, Jim Lonborg's, etc.....
It is a buyers market. It's alot of fun buying my childhood hero's.
If it wasn't for the card makers they wouldn't be affordable and I'd
have missed out on real collecting....... Now if I could stay away from
today's product and spend more wisely ............ off to open
a box of 1992-93 UpperDeck Baseball, I'm sure there's a Willie
Mays' autograph in it..............
Steve
|
529.8 | | FUTURE::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715 | Mon Jan 25 1993 17:00 | 42 |
| Re: All
I know in the Fitchburg / Leominster area alone there are about 7
card shops. Some I don't know how they stay in business because
their prices are just way too high. I don't mind paying a few bucks
over show prices, but when it's 40-50% higher I'll pass. It's not
like a few years ago when something new came out and they could
price it 100% higher and people would still buy it. People will
wait now, especially those who got burned. I remember people in
here buying the first SkyBox Basketball cards for as high as 80$ a
wax box and at the last BG show you could get them for 8$ a box.
The Dominoes Pizza QB was going for about 40$ last year and now
it's about 5$ a set. The first year of Pacific Trading football and
Upper Deck football was the same thing.
As far as the kids though, they probably realized that those prices
listed in Beckett's don't really mean much unless you're buying.
The last show I went to a kid was trying to sell some cards to a
dealer and he told the dealer they were worth so much in Beckett's
and the dealer had to tell the kid that he had plenty and just
didn't need them even if he gave him half of what Beckett's said. I
gave a friend of mine's nephews two 3200 count boxes of cards going
back to 1987, all sorted and they weren't just commons either. He
said one of his nephews took his box, pulled all the cards and went
through a Beckett's to see how much they were worth. I gave him the
cards to have fun with, not to see how much they were worth.
Like someone said there are less and less tables at these shows.
While some are 50% off, there are still those dealers who still try
and hype everything, won't bargain at all and treat you like you
owe them something and they're doing you a favor just talking to
you. Then there are other dealers who go out of their way to help,
talk to you about what so and so is hitting etc. These are the guys
I'll do my business with and if I pay a couple bucks more than so
what.
One thing that should be mentioned though is that card companies
aren't helping much either. Prices are just too high and they make
too many products. You have to be very selective in what you buy,
whether you're a collector or a dealer.
John
|
529.9 | I Propose. | POWDML::GASPARONI | | Wed Jan 27 1993 08:06 | 16 |
| I can't believe UD is Chapter 7, already. I think the card companies
are to blame, and this is what I propose:
A) The card companies slash production and eliminate all but one
line, per sport, preferably their top-line product, ie. Pinnacle
Baseball card line by SCORE, and eliminate all the other junk.
B) Price their card packs as if we were back in the 1950's, 5c per
pack, with 8 or 10 cards per pack, and they must be wax-packs.
C) Must put the gum back in the wax-pack. Since TOPPS abandoned
the gum idea, this should be no problem with other companies
using the idea.
D) Card companies cannot sell sets, nor sell to Department Stores,
this has "killed" the business.
|
529.10 | you guys really know my buttons! | ICS::LERRA | | Wed Jan 27 1993 09:22 | 16 |
| I LOVE IT!!!!!!! Not too long ago, I kept reading how some of you guys
were hoping that "Topps would get their act together and starts producing a
quality product, in limited quantities". Something about making cards
for the serious investor, or some such drivvle. Anyway, I for one am
happy to see everybody (well, not EVERYBODY) throw away the cards just
to get at the inserts! I'm currently looking for a few Classic hockey
cards of the girl goalie. I'll pay $1 per card. Any takers? I'll wait.
Also, my son has purchased as many Mattingly rookies that he wants, at
$8 to $10 each, but he'll still buy more for $4 or $5. He'll also wait.
Does the phrase, "you reap what you sow" mean anything to anyone?
regards,
dennis
|
529.11 | With new releases, price is everything... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 27 1993 12:31 | 35 |
|
> A) The card companies slash production and eliminate all but one
> line, per sport, preferably their top-line product, ie. Pinnacle
> Baseball card line by SCORE, and eliminate all the other junk.
>
> B) Price their card packs as if we were back in the 1950's, 5c per
> pack, with 8 or 10 cards per pack, and they must be wax-packs.
How do you expect card companies to make a profit by slashing
production and selling packs for $0.05 (greatly increasing demand and
then reducing the supply in response)? This sounds like a scheme to
make dealers (speculators, hoarders) and "investors" rich before the
card company goes under in about five minutes...
Personally, I don't see why so much attention is paid to production
figures (actually, the lack thereof). Anyone who believes that a card
company is going to make *less* cards at a given price than the market
will bear just so that collectors can cash in on bonafide "investments"
is seriously naive. That's not the business they're in, even if that's
their claim.
For me, if a card company produces a decent card at a reasonable price
then I don't care if they make ten billion of the things. I think the
strategy of trying to pass off "premium" cards in "limited" numbers
has burned these companies badly. Buyers have figured out the game.
Gold-stamp some cards to make them pretty and quadruple the price?
It's a rip-off. And the card collecting business is almost unique with
its layer of middleman retailers of *new product* dealing in wanton
speculation, suggested retail price be damned. It's hardly a surprise
that these establishments are now going under; their mode of operation
was a disgrace to the industry in the first place...
glenn
|
529.12 | If it costs a lot it must be a good investment | FUTURE::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715 | Wed Jan 27 1993 21:11 | 24 |
| Good points Glenn. I could care less what the production runs are and I don't
make purchases based on that. Investors will though. I love it when dealers
or a company spokesperson says something like "Collectors want a premium
product with limited print runs". Heck, I want a premium product that costs
less.
As far as the inserts go, I wish they'd go back to the days of inserting
things like Baseball Bucks, Coins, Stamps, etc. One per pack. Something
different than cards to collect. I also wish they'd pay more attention to the
actual game of baseball and skip trying to get every Tom, Dick and Harry
Rookie in their sets and releasing next year's cards the year before. What
does a kid learn about baseball from today's cards - not much. They don't
have leader cards anymore, or World Series cards, team cards, no historical
cards showing players from the past. I used to love those cards like "Mays
Makes Catch", "Haddix PItches 12 Perfect Innings" etc. The companies load the
sets with players that may not even make the big leagues to enhance their
investment potential. Kids nowadays only care about getting some card that
lists for so much in Beckett's.
The companies need to get back to making baseball cards, not stock certifi-
cates.
John
|
529.13 | your old road is rapidly fading...the times they are | DDIF::TANCILL | Sooner or later it all gets real | Wed Jan 27 1993 22:31 | 23 |
|
Some of the random inserts today are ok by me, it adds something to
the pack opening experience. I don't think going back to one per
pack is really what I'd want to see, but those inserts of our youth
were certainly more fun and kept you focused more on just plain
old collecting.
John, I think you've hit the nail on the head with the non-informative
nature of today's cards. I used to really like all Team Leader and
action play flashback cards of older football, they taught you something
and were interesting. The early 70s baseball I collected were fun
to read and much more interesting than reading some of today's cards.
Nowadays the cards are less interesting and kids seem to turn
to the Beckett as the "interesting" thing to pay attention to.
So the companies have let the almighty profit motive take them
from promoting fun and education (reading!) to promoting investing
and greed. Capitalism is not always pretty but it is a
system that corrects excesses, we have had the excesses, it will
"interesting" to follow the inevitable changes.
jeff
|
529.14 | the other shoe drops... from usenet. | MSDOA::PARKERJ | | Thu Jan 28 1993 10:48 | 62 |
| Call me naughty, but I had to reprint this one for Y'all.
I thought there may be some interest in this story from
today's Wall Street Journal. It is reprinted in part without
permission.
NEW YORK - Baseball-card stocks were hit by the news that market
leader Topps Co. will report its first quarterly loss in more than
a decade.
Topps - which experienced strong insider selling last year - sank
31%, to $8.50 from $12.25, on seven times its usual volume. Late
Monday, after the close of the market, the company said that a
"market contraction" would result in a loss for its fourth quarter
ending Feb. 28.
The announcement sent shares of several other companies in the
sports-memorabilia business south yesterday. Among them was Marvel
Entertainment Group, the comic book giant that purchased card
manufacturer Fleer Corp. last September. Shares of Marvel, which
according to analysts get half its revenue from Fleer, slid $3.375, or 12%
to $21.75 on heavy trading.
"The speculative bubble has burst in the new cards," said Robert
Lifson, president of Robert Edward Auctions Inc, a Hoboken NJ auctioneer
of sports memorabilia. "Speculators are not buying 100 cases and
putting them in their garage, because they haven't been rewarded for
doing that.
In the new environment, Mr Lifson said, "there isn't room for as many
companies to put out as much as they do and to be profitable."
As reported in this column Oct 14, Topps president, John Langdon,
sold all his 100,000 Topps shares in June and July of last year.
Earlier in 1992 came sales totaling 628,860 shares by four other
Topps insiders, including the chief financial officer and Theodore
Forstmann, a principal in investment firm Forstmann, Little and Co.
Forstmann Little held a majority stake in Topps but distributed
it to limited partners in late 1991. All the insiders sold their shares
at prices ranging from $15.375 to $19. The stock began its slide from
that range in December on disappointing third quarter earnings.
Authur T. Shorin, Topps chairman, said in an interview yesterday
that Mr. Langdon had sold his shares to buy a house and that the other
insiders trimmed their holdings for personal reasons. While there is a
shake-out under way among card manufacturers, he said, it will be the
weaker competitors, not Topps, that get taken out of the game.
(STUFF REMOVED)
After the Topps announcement, Shearson, Lehman Brothers analyst
Edward Cimilluca slashed his earnings estimate on Topps to 75 cents a share
from $1.18 this year and to 90 cents a share from $1.25 for the year ending Feb
28, 1994. He also changed his rating on the stock to "underperform,
high risk", from "buy, high risk".
(MORE STUFF DELETED)
Prices of three other sports and sportscard companies that trade over the
counter also fell yesterday on higher than usual volume.
Score Board, Inc was off $1.50 to $22.50.
In the sports card market, dealers estimate that prices are down
about 10% on pre-1970's cards and as much as 40% for 1980's baseball cards.
Robert Wynne, who covers the industry for Tuff Stuff, said the oversupply
"has choked the goose that laid the golden egg".
VMSmail To information: AUNTB::PARKERJ
Sender's personal name: DOUG ROSS @CBO 367-6465 27-Jan-1993 1314
|
529.15 | | STUDIO::GUTIERREZ | Citizen of the Cosmos | Thu Jan 28 1993 14:14 | 6 |
|
Even BJ's is showing signs of the interest decline in
trading cards, I went over there today and the trading
card section has been reduced to a little corner on the
cigarette section counter, and there were very few boxes
there, it's almost non-existent.
|
529.16 | BJ's Declining? | QETOO::HAYES | | Thu Jan 28 1993 14:23 | 7 |
| BJ's in Nashua has moved their cards from behind the tobacco counter
to the book section and it is reduced in size also. I thought it might
be the lack of product that came out in the past 3-4 weeks but then
thought better of it .... Hoops II, Fleer I, Upperdeck 1993 BB, and
on and on and on......
Steve
|
529.17 | got up on wrong side of bed... | ICS::LERRA | | Thu Jan 28 1993 15:54 | 15 |
| My next two cents....Personally, I don't think that Topps or any other
card maker ever gave a single thought to stuffing as many rookies as
possible into the sets in the hopes of having investors or collectors
buy cases of their products. I believe they stuffed as many rookies as
possible into their sets so that you'd have to buy 12 wax boxes to get
close to a single complete set of cards. I stopped collecting sets when
Score went to a 900 card set. GIVE ME A BREAK! Didn't any of you guys
collect the complete set of cards when you were kids? Sure, opening the
packs is tons of fun...but I always thought the point was to complete
the set. The inserts are the closest thing to marketing genious these
guys have ever come up with. Instead of having to purchase 12 boxes to
complete a set, we'll put one insert card in every 20 boxes...and make
it a 20 card insert set! Oh boy! We're sure having some fun now!
|
529.18 | | FUTURE::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715 | Thu Jan 28 1993 21:16 | 25 |
| Re: .17
I think you're wrong about companies not giving a single thought
about putting all the rookies in their sets. Once the 1984 Donruss
Don Mattingly card skyrocketed the big emphasis was on rookie
cards and that's what sold a company's set. Topps has even said
this with respect to them being the only company last year with
Brien Taylor. The companies would load their sets with rookies who
were two or three years away, hadn't even played in the bigs yet
and that was part of their selling point because it had the poten-
tial of being a great investment with all the rookies.
While everyone hated Bowman cards when they first came out, now
you're starting to see articles how the 1990 Bowman set had this
player and that player way before everyone else. And that was a
small set.
When I was a kid there were only 16-20 teams, Topps was the only
company and you had seven series. While no one ever bought complete
boxes, chances are you could get the whole series buying a few
packs each day or so and trading with friends. Back then though you
usually collected certain players or teams and there wasn't really
an emphasis on complete sets.
John
|
529.19 | What is your Opinion(s) | EBBCLU::MONDALTO | | Thu Feb 18 1993 08:40 | 42 |
|
Subj: Notefile MARKET_INVESTING Note 377.4
<<< SUBWAY::DISK$D1:[NOTES$LIBRARY]MARKET_INVESTING.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Market Investing >-
================================================================================
Note 377.4 baseball cards? 4 of 5
33 lines 9-FEB-1993 13:54
-< articles in paper >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just read two articles in the paper the last week that
have bearing on this. One of them was similar to .3
which indicated the *dramatic* decline of baseball's
popularity citing that only 6% named a baseball team when
naming their favorite team and only 4% named a baseball
player when naming their favorite athlete. It also pointed
out that
- there is no national baseball contract for weekly
games
- many kids growing up today have *never* seen a
world series game to completion
Do you remember the excitement of catching World Series
scores when in school? Rushing home at the bell to catch
the last few innings on t.v. or radio?
Baseball, for numerous reasons, is in decline. Collectables
are dependent upon collectors which is dependent upon interest
in the sport.
The other article discussed card collecting specifically noting
that the market is oversaturated, that some companies are *losing*
money and that many people who got in as investors are starting
to get out (because the sport itself does not hold them to
stay in - only money which isn't necessarily there). Collecting
is starting to go back to being done by collectors, but this still
has quite a ways to go. Sounds to me like now is a bad time to
get into collecting, but that if you must, get quality cards from
the 60s and 70s which have a relatively stable price and you can
hope that they will continue to rise.
|
529.20 | | FUTURE::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715 | Thu Feb 18 1993 20:07 | 10 |
| John, I moved your note over here since this topic kind of dealt with
the note you posted. Anyway, I like the guy's comment that it doesn't
look like it's a good time to get into card collecting. I think he
meant it's not a good time to get into card investing.
With the new taxes, I mean contributions, we'll be getting whacked
with in a little while, there'll be even less money for cards. What's
the number of BTU's generated by burning 1,000 commons ...
John
|
529.21 | The hobby is heating (us) up! | MSDOA::PARKERJ | | Fri Feb 19 1993 11:13 | 11 |
| >> With the new taxes, I mean contributions, we'll be getting whacked
>> with in a little while, there'll be even less money for cards. What's
>> the number of BTU's generated by burning 1,000 commons ...
It all depends on the manufactuer, I've found that topps stoge pretty
good when stuffed in the blaze in 800 count boxes. The premium
quality cards like UD go pretty good too, they burn with lots of color
from inks or finishes I guess. I was ahead of the pack I geuss in
using alternative energy sources.
Jon
|
529.22 | No fun | FUTURE::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715 | Sun Jul 18 1993 11:33 | 10 |
| Judging from the amount of entries lately (and most of those have been
wanted or for sale notes), I'd say that interest in card collecting or
investing is definitely on the down swing. Personally speaking, I
can't get into it as much as before. Wax boxes cost 30$ or 40$ and you
then you get idiot dealers saying collectors aren't paying as much for
cards as they should. I think this will be the last year for me. I'll
finish the sets I started on this year, but that'll be it. The cost
doesn't justify it anymore.
John
|
529.23 | | STUDIO::GUTIERREZ | Citizen of the Cosmos | Mon Jul 19 1993 08:50 | 8 |
|
I went through that very same stage some time ago, and I decided to
stay away from the Sports trading cards, I'm now strictly a non-sport
collector and I enjoy that much better than I did when I was collecting
sports cards, there is much more variety of subjects, the prices are
more reasonable and they're more fun, as far as I'm concerned.
Juan
|
529.24 | Baseball will be sold soon too. | MSDOA::PARKERJ | | Mon Jul 19 1993 09:41 | 9 |
| I quit collecting basebal, sold all my football, never really collected
basketball anyway. Now I just buy some not all hockey cards available.
Interest is definetly on the down slide as far as I am concerned. I
cannot justify buying cards aat up to 55 bucks a box. I am collecting
bruins cards and memorabilia for the enjoyment of collecting. Never
really was a money thing, it is nice though to feel like if you decide
to sell it all you can get what you paid for it.
Jon
|
529.25 | | ISLNDS::YANNEKIS | | Mon Jul 19 1993 09:50 | 17 |
|
I agree ... sports card collecting seems to be slowing down and I've
seen at least two pieces of evidence.
1) On my ride home I used to be able to hit about 8 shops if I wandered
a little. In the 6 months at least 3 of them have bit the dust.
2) My mail order catalogs have much better selection of old stuff
available these days with lots of specials on mere stars
(Killebrew, etc). Only the real high end old stuff (Mays, Ryan) is
hard to find and high priced.
Greg
|
529.26 | Sour | DRAGN::BOURQUARD | This is not here | Mon Jul 19 1993 10:42 | 14 |
| I've definitely lost interest. I used to go to a show or two a month, stop
in at card stores in the Nashua area a couple of times a week and trade
regularly in this conference. After Shaq-mania I'm burnt out. More
specifically for me it's the inserts that have ruined it. I haven't touched
a card in two or three months, though I do still read this conference.
I've collected NBA HOOPS cards since '89. Pretty good cards at a reasonable
price. This year, with the slim chance of getting a Shaq insert, the Series II
boxes started out at $60 and when up from there. Sorry, but the quality of
those cards just isn't worth that much money. I wish they would issue a
non-insert offering.
Dan
|
529.27 | not all bad | RECV::MCEVOY | | Mon Jul 19 1993 18:02 | 15 |
| I'm not ready to jump ship yet. True, boxes have become overpriced,
and dealers are scum, but there is still a lot of fun to be had in
collecting. You have to be selective, and you can't get swallowed by
the insert hype. (who can afford to?)
I've always been a big basketball collector, but last year was just too
much. I'm enjoying football much more of late, probably because it
hasn't been beat into my head like basketball did last year.
It's still a lot of fun to collect the players and teams that you
like. At least the common cards.
Now, who's got a '92 Bowman Anthony Carter to trade me?....
-dennis
|
529.28 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I like mine with french fried potatoes | Mon Jul 19 1993 19:49 | 6 |
| I think it's ok if you decide to wait. For example, Fleer Ultra II
hoop. Everyone knew it wasn't worth $100+/box. Now it goes for what,
$60 maybe? Give it another month and it will come back to where it
should be. How much are the Triple Crown inserts now? I bet they're
a lot cheaper than last February.
|
529.29 | still hanging ten | DDIF::TANCILL | old enough to repay, but young enough to sell | Wed Jul 21 1993 01:11 | 35 |
|
I think it's easy to get soured when you like to collect sets from one
or more sports, it has become too much $$. I'm still having mucho fun
collecting one team, from one sport. Trying to get all the cards is
actually a fun pursuit (although you can easily run into the money
blues too, especially when you start going for the older cards; anyone
want to buy a redskins collection, '48-present? ;-)
I agree the general fun is waning, it's the specialized collectors
who will continue to be the backbone of the "collecting world", it will
go on forever at some level because of this, regardless of what happens
in the "investing/speculating world". If you're souring on collecting,
trying focus down one 1 team or one player, etc. It's remains alot
of fun.
I also haven't gone to many shows in several months, although a larger
show can be prime hunting ground for specialized collectors. I was
on vacation this past week on the Eastern shore of Maryland and
spent a few hours at the Seashore Spectacular 7 in Ocean City. Billed
as 150 tables, there were maybe 100. But still I found several
dealers with high quality old football and picked up some nice old
redskins. The highlight was finding one lonely guy in a corner with
most of his table being the highly "scarce" stadium club football
series 3. He was really depressed at how bad the 3 day show had been
(this was the 3rd day), but I was over joyed to buy a redskins common
player from series 3 for $1 from him. Didn't make his day but I was
pysched to fork over $1 and scratch off another possibly hard to find
card off my skins want list, made my day (that and some great waves
that afternoon).
jeff
collecting
|
529.30 | "House of cards" | DDIF::TANCILL | old enough to repay, but young enough to sell | Thu Jul 22 1993 14:03 | 3 |
|
There's an cover article in today's USA Today sports section about
this very subject in conjunction with the National show in Chicago.
|
529.31 | | ISLNDS::YANNEKIS | | Thu Jul 22 1993 14:25 | 10 |
|
> There's an cover article in today's USA Today sports section about
> this very subject in conjunction with the National show in Chicago.
Would you (or someone) provide a short summary of the article for those
of us US-Today challenged?
Thanks,
Greg
|
529.32 | basic jist | SEND::TANCILL | | Sun Jul 25 1993 23:18 | 19 |
|
Well I can't transcribe it because it went to the recycle center at
the dump yesterday. Basically the article was saying that the age
of speculation in sports cards is over, completely. The flow of money
from the early to mid-80s go-go days when "investments" in cards out
performed stocks & bonds is over, peaked, done it, fini. But, there is
still alot `o-collecting fun to be had, one dealer is quoted as saying
the collectors are now specializing in one team or in several players
(sounds familiar). The article had a few other silly quotes from
know it all dealers, "people thought they could buy cards, stick them
away, and pay for little Johnny's college education, it just ain't
going to happen", duh. The rest of the article was interspersed with
tidbits about the national in Chicago this weekend, how it was still
going to be excellent and exciting and boffo/neato.
Wish I could've gone...
jeff
|
529.33 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Mon Jul 26 1993 17:55 | 7 |
|
I'm still in it, but most of you know that I collect on SD Chargers and
maybe that has kept me from being burnt out on collecting. Maybe the
answer is to limit your scope. I dunno.
Live from Charger Central.....Glenn
|
529.34 | Rotten Deal(ers)...Not you Mike! | DNEAST::PURNELL_CHRI | Pyro Suppression Technician | Tue Jul 27 1993 15:03 | 24 |
|
DEALERS....That's my problem with collecting...
****(with exception of Mr. Kelly, of course!!!!)
"Hey mister...I have some cards for you to look at!"
"Not now, see me in December! Can't move hockey right now!"
"Oh ok, hey, would you take $4.00 for that Ed Belfour?"
"Nope..The price says $6.00, you pay $6.00!"
"See Ya!"
Granted you don't always see this...but as of late, I get furiated
with these dealers who will pay 50% of low Beckett for cards during
off season....and then turn around and ask Hi Beckett when you want
to buy!!! Cards are cards...whatever the season I say!
I find that trading in the NOTES is the best way to go! I hope
you guys out there keep the hobby flying! I'm fairly new at this
and I thoroughly enjoy the collecting and trading...
Looking forward to the 93/94 Hockey Season and the DUCKS!?!?!?!?!?
* Chris *
|
529.35 | | SALEM::DODA | I'll buy that for a dollar! | Tue Jul 27 1993 15:08 | 19 |
| I gave up on the completing every set of every sport of every
manufacturer long ago.
The price gouging on new stuff was too much to take. I decided to
concentrate on autographs and novelty stuff like manufacturer
giveaways etc.
I like the autographs because they "show" well. Balls, cards, and
pictures can be displayed and that appealled to me alot more than
sticking completed sets in the closet to collect dust.
The food giveways etc appealled to me because, in general, there
wasn't a zillion of each card out there and they were cheap.
Obviously, I'm not interested in making a killing.
I've also started trying to complete my Yaz card collection....
daryll
|
529.36 | NEED HELP TO GET STARTED | ANGLIN::SVOSS | | Fri Aug 06 1993 16:59 | 12 |
| I just started getting into card collecting this year, Basketball only.
It didn't take long to see how much one can spend in a hurry. It's
also very time consuming to complete the big sets, insert sets... so
I'd like to start collecting cards on specific players, the Price
brothers for starters. Being new though I'm stumped on how to go about
finding out all of the cards printed for specific players. I
subscribed to Becketts Basketball but haven't seen any specifics on
collecting like this.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Steve
|
529.37 | 2 places to get started | DDIF::TANCILL | Well, hello Mr. Soul | Sat Aug 07 1993 23:35 | 9 |
|
Well you can buy a Beckett that lists all players and their cards
or I have a software package that will search a database of all
basketball cards (and when a get version 3 it will do searches
by team name). Send me some mail with the names you want a list for,
that ought to get you started.
jeff
|
529.38 | | ISLNDS::YANNEKIS | | Mon Aug 09 1993 10:06 | 13 |
|
> brothers for starters. Being new though I'm stumped on how to go about
> finding out all of the cards printed for specific players. I
> subscribed to Becketts Basketball but haven't seen any specifics on
> collecting like this.
Sports Americana prints cards list by player ... most card stores have
the baseball version ... I don't know how easy it will be to find a
basketball version. Maybe a store that has the baseball version will
order you a basketball version.
Greg
|
529.39 | | PENUTS::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715 | Tue Sep 28 1993 12:45 | 9 |
| Two stores in the Fitchburg / Leominster area recently folded including
one that had been around for about 10 years. Another shop moved from a
normal store location into a corner of a flea market.
A dealer from one of the local stores told me he sold boxes of Topps
Finest for 225$ with a nifty profit around 185$. I thought 125$ at a
show a couple of weeks ago was bad.
John
|
529.40 | | PENUTS::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715 | Thu Sep 30 1993 13:33 | 8 |
| Anyone else notice that some of these super premium cards tend to stick
together (especially Classic cards) if exposed to a little heat and
humidity. Someone gave me some cards they had left in their car all day
and when I got them home to look at them, they were stuck pretty good.
I had to tap them on the table to separate them. The old regular cards
never seemed to do this.
John
|
529.41 | | AWECIM::MCAULIFFE | | Thu Sep 30 1993 14:03 | 8 |
| John and I talked about just last week. I've definitely noticed
the Stadium Club, Ultra brands sticking. In fact, I had a box of
Ultra in my closet (fairly normal tempertures) and they still stuck
together, though not as much if left in the car or attic.
Great, I just moved all my stuff to the attic... Oh boy...
Dan
|
529.42 | Me too... | STUDIO::GUTIERREZ | Citizen of the Cosmos | Thu Sep 30 1993 14:13 | 13 |
|
Dan,
don't you know that the attic is one of the "worst" places
to keep trading cards ?. That's because there is too much variation
in temperature and humidity. Of course, if that's the only place
you have for storing cards, then you have no choice.
I noticed the same "stickiness" on many of the new non-sport
thin cards lately. Must be the kind of ink they're using these days.
Juan
|
529.43 | UD is worse | 16134::ZELENT_J | | Thu Sep 30 1993 15:16 | 8 |
|
I notice it on this years UD Baseball. I started a set and put it
in my closet, when I took it out to add some cards they were stuck
in clumps of a hundred or more and were very hard to get apart
without damaging them.
Joe
|
529.44 | down on UV | SEND::MCEVOY | | Thu Sep 30 1993 16:52 | 12 |
| I have a set of 91 Classic Basketball that I hadn't looked at in a
while. It came in a prepackaged box. I opened it up the other day and
saw exactly the same thing -- clumps of cards were sticking together,
it was a mess. I was able to get all of the cards apart, I don't think
I damaged any of the cards, but I may have.
I think the only way to really keep these kinds of cards for longterm
is to put each card in a sleeve, or a sheet -- not fun.
I agree, I wish the cards would go back to NON UV coated.
-dennis
|